New zero Poisson’s ratio models

Vladimir Gaal,1 Varlei Rodrigues,1 Socrates E. Dantas,2 Douglas S. Galvão,3

and Alexandre F. Fonseca3, a)

1)Applied Physics Department, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-

970, Brazil.

2)Physics Department, Science Institute, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora,

Juiz de Fora, MG, 36036-330, Brazil.

3)Applied Physics Department, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-

970, Brazil.

Most materials exhibit positive Poisson’s ratio (PR) values but special structures

can also present negative and, even rarer, zero (or close to zero) PR. Null PR

structures have received much attention due to their unusual properties and

potential applications in different fields, such as aeronautics and bio-engineering.

Here, we present a new and simple near-zero PR 2D topological model based on

a structural block composed of two smooth and rigid bars connected by a soft

membrane or spring. It is not based on re-entrant or honeycomb-like

configurations, which have been the basis of many null or quasi-null PR models.

Our topological model was 3D printed and the experimentally obtained PR was

−0.003 ± 0.001, which is one the closest to zero value ever reported. This

topological model can be easily extended to 3D systems and with compression in

any direction. The advantages and disadvantages of these models are also

addressed.

Formally defined by Poisson in 1827,1 the so-called Poisson’s ratio (PR) is

largely used to characterize material mechanical properties.2 PR is defined as

the negative ratio of transverse strain (εx) to longitudinal strain (εz) along the

direction of a stretching or a compression stress σz = εx / εz.3,4

The vast majority of materials present positive PR since εx and εz usually have

opposite signs, i. e., they expand (contract) crosswise - x direction - when

compressed (tensioned) longwise - z direction. A few materials possess negative

PR (so-called auxetics),5–7 i. e., they contract (expand) laterally when

compressed (tensioned) longitudinally. Auxeticity has been seen in foams,5,6,8

crystalline hinged structures,9,10 nanomaterials,11 and in certain extreme states

of matter.12 Zero or close to zero PR materials, i. e., materials that neither

contract nor expand laterally under the application of tensile or compressive

stresses such as, for example, cork2,13 and entangled springs,14,15 are even

rarer and have received much attention towards applications in different fields as

aeronautics16,17 medicine,18 and tissue engineering.19

One paradigm for the negative PR behavior is the so-called re-entrant

honeycomb structures, which are structures with inward protruded ribs,6,20,21

see Fig. 1(a). Semi-re-entrant structures, Fig. 1(b), combine regular (positive PR)

and re-entrant (negative PR) honeycomb topologies in such a way that they

cancel each other and the net effect is a null PR behavior.22 This has been

exploited to create zero or quasi zero PR structures, such as SILICOMB,23,24

chevron,22,25,26 accordion,16,27 among others.28–31 This plethora of

geometrical models indicates the actual in- terest in developing and improving

such a special and rare type of structure.

In this work, we propose a new type of topological model that presents near-zero

PR under compression, which was experimentally realized using 3D printer

technology. The model consists of an array of building blocks, as described

below. It is important to stress that our model is not based on semi-re-entrant, re-

entrant or regular honeycomb structures.

The building blocks of our model are composed of two parallel rigid bars with

smooth surfaces and a soft and elastic membrane or spring connecting the rigid

bars. Thereafter, the spring direction will be addressed as BAD - block axial

direction. Fig. 1(c) presents the idealized model and Fig. 1(d) the 3D printed

model where the curved membranes play the role of the spring.

The model array is generated by combining the building blocks in a way their

BADs are mixed into two orthogonal directions, i. e., always parallel and/or

perpendicular to each other. One example of a 2D array of 3 × 4 blocks is shown

in Fig. 2. When compressed along the z direction by a σz stress, the blocks that

have their BADs parallel to z will get squeezed, following and accommodating εz

strain. The blocks with BADs orthogonal to the compression direction will only

slide, without deformation, because of the rigid bars. The length of the system

along x direction remains the same. These two mechanisms together led to zero

PR behavior. If the stress is released, the system almost elastically recovers its

initial configuration because the rigid bars have smooth surfaces and the friction

energy dissipation can be neglected. Also, if we apply a compressive stress

along the x direction instead of the z one, the effect will be the same, leading

again to a zero PR. The mechanism of our model does not rely on a combination

of positive and negative PR structures, as in the semi-re-entrant ones22, but on

the emergence of a zero PR in two dimensions from a system having already a

zero PR in one direction. As the building blocks are not structurally bonded, it

should be stressed that our model cannot be used in applications that depend on

tensile stresses. In this sense, it can be considered as an intermediate structure

between the fully connected structure of corks and the fully unconnected

structure of the gases, both presenting zero or close to zero PR.4 This model can

be easily extended to a 3D system and with compression in any direction. It

suffices to have building blocks with BAD oriented both parallel and

perpendicular to each other along any direction.

Our model was 3D printed with a homemade system (fused deposition

modeling)32 using standard commercial polylactic acid thermoplastic filament.

The soft spring is composed of two relatively thin membranes bonded at their

middle and then to two rigid bars, Fig. 1(d). In Fig. 3, we present a 3 × 4

assembly of printed blocks used to demonstrate the null PR behavior.

A compressive stress was applied to the structure shown in Fig. 3, along the z

direction, and the whole process was video recorded with a resolution of 1980

pixels × 1080 pixels and 30 fps (see the supplementary material). The z and x

length values were obtained by processing, frame by frame, the experiment

video using a python script. In Fig. 4 we present time evolution of the measured

lengths along the z and x directions of the 3 × 4 assembled blocks during

compression. It is clear from this Figure that, considering the error bars, the

system size along x direction remains practically constant, thus characterizing a

near-zero Poisson regime. From these data, we obtained PR = −0.003 ± 0.001.

These results show that our model provides an alternative way to create close to

zero PR systems. Just for comparison, cork, beryllium, diamond and graphene

sponge PRs are about 0.064,13 0.05,33 ≤ 0.0534 and 0.04,35 respectively.

Other relevant structures, such as SILICOMB proto- types made of ABS plastic

have PR between −0.03 and 0.05,23 patellar surface of canine femoral articular

cartilage have PR ∼ 0.07,36 and semi re-entrant semiflexynes molecules

obtained by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations present PR about 0.01.25

In summary, we propose a new type and very simple geometrical 2D model that

presents near- zero PR under compression. It is important to stress that our

model is not based on semi-re-entrant, re-entrant or regular honeycomb

structures, which have been the basis of many structural zero PR reported in the

literature. Our model was experimentally realized using 3D printer technology.

The obtained PR values were PR = −0.003 ± 0.001, which are ones of the

closest to zero PR values ever produced. This topological model can be easily

extended to 3D systems and with compression along any direction. We hope the

present work will stimulate further studies along these lines.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

See supplementary material for the video showing the compression of our 3 × 4

system.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

A.F.F. and D.S.G. are fellows of the Brazilian Agency CNPq through grants

numbers #311587/2018- 6 and #307331/2014-8, respectively. A.F.F. and D.S.G.

acknowledge grants from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) numbers

#2018/02992-4 and #2013/08293-7 respectively.

REFERENCES

1S. D. Poisson, “Note sur l’Extension des Fils et des Plaques élastiques,”

Annales de Chimie et de Physique 36, 384 (1827).

2G. N. Greaves, “Poisson’s ratio over two centuries: Challenging hypotheses,”

Notes and Records of the Royal Society 67, 37–58 (2013).

3D. R. Askeland, P. P. Fulay, and W. J. Wright, The Science and Engineering of

Materials, SI Edition, 6th ed. (CENGAGE Learning, Stamford, USA, 2011).

4G. N. Greaves, A. L. Greer, R. S. Lakes, and T. Rouxel, “Poisson’s ratio and

modern materials,” Nature Materials 10, 823–837 (2011).

5K. E. Evans, M. A. Nkansah, I. J. Hutchinson, and S. C. Rogers, “Molecular

network design,” Nature 353, 124 (1991).

6R. Lakes, “Foam Structures with a Negative Poisson’s Ratio,” Science 235,

1038 (1987).

7R. Lakes, “Advances in negative poisson’s ratio materials,” Advanced Materials

5, 293–296 (1993).

8B. Brandel and R. S. Lakes, “Negative Poisson’s ratio polyethylene foams,”

Journal of Materials Science 36, 5885–5893 (2001).

9D. S. Galvão and R. H. Baughman, “Crystalline networks with unusual predicted

mechanical and thermal properties,” Nature 365, 735–737 (1993).

10R. H. Baughman, S. Stafström, C. Cui, and S. O. Dantas, “Materials with

negative compressibilities in one or more dimensions,” Science 279, 1522–1524

(1998).

11H. S. Park and S. Y. Kim, “A perspective on auxetic nanomaterials,” Nano

Convergence 4, 10 (2017).

12R. H. Baughman, S. O. Dantas, S. Stafström, A. A. Zakhidov, T. B. Mitchell,

and D. H. E. Dubin, “Negative poisson’s ratios for extreme states of matter,”

Science 288, 2018–2022 (2000).

13M. A. Fortes and M. T. Nogueira, “The Poisson Effect in Cork,” Materials

Science and Engi- neering: A 122, 227–232 (1989).

14D. Rodney, B. Gadot, O. R. Martinez, S. R. du Roscoat, and L. Orgéas,

“Reversible dilatancy in entangled single-wire materials,” Nature Materials 15,

72–77 (2016).

15R. H. Baughman and A. F. Fonseca, “Straining to expand entanglements,”

Nature Materials 15, 7–8 (2016).

16J. Chen, X. Shen, and J. Li, “Zero Poisson’s ratio flexible skin for potential two-

dimensional wing morphing,” Aerospace Science and Technology 45, 228–241

(2015).

17E. A. Bubert, B. K. Woods, K. Lee, C. S. Kothera, and N. M. Wereley, “Design

and fabrication of a passive 1D morphing aircraft skin,” Journal of Intelligent

Material Systems and Structures 21, 1699–1717 (2010).

18P. Soman, D. Y. Fozdar, J. W. Lee, A. Phadke, S. Varghese, and S. Chen, “A

three-dimensional polymer scaffolding material exhibiting a zero Poisson’s ratio,”

Soft Matter 8, 4946–4951 (2012).

19G. C. Engelmayr, M. Cheng, C. J. Bettinger, J. T. Borenstein, R. Langer, and

L. E. Freed, “Accordion-like honeycombs for tissue engineering of cardiac

anisotropy,” Nature Materials 7, 1003–1010 (2008).

20A. G. Kolpakov, “Determination of the average characteristics of elastic

frameworks,” Prikl. Matem. Mekhan. 49, 969–977 (1985).

21L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby, Cellular solids, Structure and properties, 6th ed.

(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).

22J. N. Grima, L. Oliveri, D. Attard, B. Ellul, R. Gatt, G. Cicala, and G. Recca,

“Hexagonal hon- eycombs with zero Poisson’s ratios and enhanced stiffness,”

Advanced Engineering Materials 12, 855–862 (2010).

23C. Lira, F. Scarpa, M. Olszewska, and M. Celuch, “The SILICOMB cellular

structure: Me- chanical and dielectric properties,” Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic

Research 246, 2055–2062 (2009).

24K. Virk, A. Monti, T. Trehard, M. Marsh, K. Hazra, K. Boba, C. D. Remillat, F.

Scarpa, and I. R. Farrow, “SILICOMB PEEK Kirigami cellular structures:

Mechanical response and en- ergy dissipation through zero and negative

stiffness,” Smart Materials and Structures 22, 084014 (2013).

25J. N. Grima and D. Attard, “Molecular networks with a near zero Poisson’s

ratio,” Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research 248, 111–116 (2011). 26D.

Attard and J. N. Grima, “Modelling of hexagonal honeycombs exhibiting zero

Poisson’s ratio,” Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research 248, 52–59 (2011).

27K. R. Olympio and F. Gandhi, “Zero poisson’s ratio cellular honeycombs for

flex skins undergoing one-dimensional morphing,” Journal of Intelligent Material

Systems and Structures 21, 1737–1753 (2010).

28J. Huang, X. Gong, Q. Zhang, F. Scarpa, Y. Liu, and J. Leng, “In-plane

mechanics of a novel zero Poisson’s ratio honeycomb core,” Composites Part B:

Engineering 89, 67–76 (2016).

29Y. Chen and M. H. Fu, “Mechanical Properties of a Novel Zero Poisson’s Ratio

Honeycomb,” Advanced Engineering Materials 20, 1700452 (2018).

30J. Huang, W. Liu, and A. Tang, “Effects of fine-scale features on the elastic

properties of zero Poisson’s ratio honeycombs,” Materials Science and

Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology 236-237, 95–103

(2018).

31J. Huang, Q. Zhang, F. Scarpa, Y. Liu, and J. Leng, “Multi-stiffness topology

optimization of zero Poisson’s ratio cellular structures,” Composites Part B:

Engineering 140, 35–43 (2018).

32G. Gaal, M. Mendes, T. P. de Almeida, M. H. Piazzetta, Â. L. Gobbi, A. Riul,

and V. Rodrigues, “Simplified fabrication of integrated microfluidic devices using

fused deposition modeling 3d printing,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 242,

35 – 40 (2017).

33A. Migliori, H. Ledbetter, D. J. Thoma, and T. W. Darling, “Beryllium’s

monocrystal and polycrystal elastic constants,” Journal of Applied Physics 95,

2436–2440 (2004).

34E. Anastassakis and M. Siakavellas, “Elastic properties of textured diamond

and silicon,” Journal of Applied Physics 90, 144–152 (2001).

35Y. Wu, N. Yi, L. Huang, T. Zhang, S. Fang, H. Chang, N. Li, J. Oh, J. A. Lee,

M. Kozlov, A. C. Chipara, H. Terrones, P. Xiao, G. Long, Y. Huang, F. Zhang, L.

Zhang, X. Lepró, C. Haines, M. D. Lima, N. P. Lopez, L. P. Rajukumar, A. L.

Elias, S. Feng, S. J. Kim, N. T. Narayanan, P. M. Ajayan, M. Terrones, A. Aliev,

P. Chu, Z. Zhang, R. H. Baughman, and Y. Chen, “Three- dimensionally bonded

spongy graphene material with super compressive elasticity and near-zero

Poisson’s ratio,” Nature Communications 6, 6141 (2015).

36J. S. Jurvelin, J. P. A. Arokoski, E. B. Hunziker, and H. J. Helminen,

“Topographical variation of the elastic properties of articular cartilage in the

canine knee,” Journal of Biomechanics 33, 669–675 (2000).

FIG. 1. Models for negative and zero PR structures. (a) re-entrant structure; (b)

semi-re-entrant structure; (c) building block of the zero PR model proposed here,

composed by two rigid bars (gray) and one soft spring connecting them; and (d)

the 3D printing block where the curved membranes play the rule of springs in (c)

model. The arrows below panels (c) and (d) indicate the corresponding direction

of the block axial direction (BAD). See manuscript for details.

FIG. 2. (a) One example of an assembled zero PR system formed by an array of

3 × 4 blocks. (b) The expected structure after the action of a compressive stress,

σz, applied along the z direction.

FIG. 3. 3 x 4 array of building blocks assembled with BAD’s blocks oriented both

along and perpendicular to a z direction. See the video in supplementary material

for the compression of this structure.

FIG. 4. Time evolution measurements of z and x lengths during compression in z

direction.