news on headtail simulations for sps
DESCRIPTION
News on Headtail simulations for SPS. Benoit for the SPSU and ICE. Agenda. Comparison of simulations with nominal and low gamma transition How to obtain emittance growth? From indirect space charge? PTC/ORBIT HEADTAIL Other code? From incoherent part of the impedance? HEADTAIL - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
News on Headtail simulations for SPS
Benoit for the SPSU and ICE
![Page 2: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Comparison of simulations with nominal and low gamma transition
• How to obtain emittance growth?– From indirect space charge?
• PTC/ORBIT• HEADTAIL• Other code?
– From incoherent part of the impedance?• HEADTAIL
• plans
![Page 3: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Nominal Vs Low GammaT• Used the same low voltage (2 MV) for both nominal and low GammaT to
be closer to measurements.
• HeadTail simulations– 1 impedance kick per turn.– No longitudinal or transverse space charge.– Impedance model includes kickers, BPHs, BPVs, 200 MHz and 800 MHz RF cavities, beam
pipe (1 turn wake).– Non linear longitudinal restoring force.– Chromaticity=0
![Page 4: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Intensity thresholdsNominal Vs Low GammaT
Nominal main threshold at 1.6e11p/b Low GammaT main threshold at 2.8e11p/b
Note: longitudinal emittance much smaller in simulations with low gammaT
![Page 5: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Intensity thresholdsNominal Vs Low GammaT
![Page 6: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Intensity thresholdsNominal Vs Low GammaT
![Page 7: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Tune shiftsNominal Vs Low GammaT
![Page 8: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Agenda
• Comparison of simulations with nominal and low gamma transition
• How to obtain emittance growth?– From indirect space charge?
• PTC/ORBIT• HEADTAIL• Other code?
– From incoherent part of the impedance?• HEADTAIL
• plans
![Page 9: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Emittance growth with Headtail?Nominal Vs low GammaT
Horizontal emittance
Vertical emittance
Number of turns Number of turns
Chromaticity of Q’=2 in both cases (to have stability)
Horizontal emittance
Vertical emittance
Blow up due to quadrupolar impedance seem to affect more the horizontal plane Very different from situation in the machine!!!
![Page 10: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Preliminary conclusion
• Need to check the validity of using a single kick for incoherent effects
need to refurbish the Headtail version with lattice and adapt it to our ZBASE tool
we are working on it
• Since the quadrupolar impedance is larger in the horizontal plane… probably blow up is due to another mechanism.
![Page 12: News on Headtail simulations for SPS](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56812cdb550346895d919e04/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Plans for the impedance/HEADTAIL team
• Assess possibility to use HEADTAIL with lattice for emittance
• Work on initialization
• Improve models of the kickers– To account for C-shaped structures– To account for metallic stripes on MKE– To account for laminar material in MKD– To account for longitudinal segmentation in MKP– To account for external circuits
• Improve SPS impedance model – Pumpimg ports (shielded and unshielded)– MSE/MST– ZS– Etc.