1

Via Paolina Bonaparte, 51 - 55049 VIAREGGIO (LU)

www.fondazionemariava ltor ta . it

MariaV altorta

PROBLEMS OF THE PRESENT TIME

NewsletterEdited by Maria Valtorta Foundation – December 24, 2018 – Newsletter N° 53

Against whom falsifies the thoughts and writings of Maria Valtorta

There are many ways of falsifying all that Maria Valtorta has written with agonizing weariness. From October 12, 1961 day of her entrance to Paradise (obviously to my personal judgement), many and in various ways have opposed to her writings and herself, with insults, with wrong convictions, with prejudices, with presumption and conceit (show off their knowledge), with haughtiness, without any knowledge of her texts and much more.

The more Mara Valtorta is known the easier this happens. What can we say about whoever falsifies Maria Valtorta’s Writings to underpin its erroneous and dissertations theses? A falsifier is he whom just like those who counterfeits money.

Falsifying is defined as:1 - Imitating more or less for objectives precisely malicious or unlawful:falsification of a signature; counterfeiting banknotes; painting fakes.2 - Manipulating to the detriment of the truth, distorting; fudging with a piece of news.

The following excerpt taken from Maria Valtorta’s must be well understood in its real and obvious sense:

«No one will ever dare disguise to as a “scientific” the Work that I gave you. Science, will only be explained, in this case, as a clairvoyant phenomenon, or that is demonic.

You know how I judge each manifestation of obscure forces, such as clairvoyants.It is said in the immutable Divine Law [Leviticus 20, 6] that I have confirmed that people that turns to magicians or conferring to fortune-tellers is to contaminating oneself, and he who seeks shall be set face to face against God who will cut him off from among his people».(Maria Valtorta, Quadernetti, Centro Editoriale Valtortiano, Isola del Liri FR 2006, pp. 183-184).

What does Jesus want to say?This: no one should mistake the Work He gave to Maria Valtorta, for a so-called

clairvoyant science work. In other words a spiritualist.Well, now Maria Valtorta, in her letters to Mother Theresa Maria, wrote (in one

of these without date, but supposedly of the biginning of the 1949) the same thing:

Maria Valtorta Foun-dation wishes a Merry Christmas, greetings

With Maria Valtorta, that we believe Blessed in Heaven, we wish you and your kin

a Merry Christmas, a good solemnity of Mary most Holy Mother of God and a pleasant

Saint Epiphany. May these holi-days commemorating Jesus will

fill your heart with peace.

«And the light increases more and more. It is now unbearable to the eye. And the Virgin Vergin disappears in

so much light as if She had been absorbed by an incandescent

curtain… and the Mother emerges.Yes. When the light becomes

endurable, once again to my eyes, I see Mary with her new-born Son in Her arms. A little Baby rosy and

plump, bustling with His little hands as big as rose buds and kicking with His tiny feet that could be contained in the hollow of the heart of the rose: and is crying with a thin trembling

voice, just like a new-born little lamb, opening His pretty little mouth that

resembles a wild strawberry, and showing a tiny tongue that trembles against the rosy roof of His mouth; and He moves His little head that is

so blond that seems without any hair, a little round head that His Mummy

holds in the hollow of Her hand, while She looks at Her Baby and

adores Him weeping and smiling at the same time and She bends down

to kiss Him, not on His innocent head, but on the center of His chest, where underneath there is His little

heart beating for us… where one day there will be the Wound. His Mother is doctoring, that wound, in advance,

with Her immaculate kiss».This text has been excerpted from

The Gospel, as it was revealed to me, vol. I cpt. 29, CEV Edizion

2

«What makes my sufferings increase because of the undeserved decree, it’s the almost certainty, based on factual profs I have in my hands, that, in cahoots with the H.O. [Holy Office]. etc, are the same fathers, have always aimed to publish the Work without approval, and as «human work»; actually now they wanted to call it «scientific», that is because of its clairvoyant inner style, pointing out at me as well as human: spiritual, making believe I was either a spiritic and in a clairvoyant way (satanic because to me everything that is clairvoyance or spiritic, no matter what, is satanic) whatever I saw and heard that I described and written in my work».(Maria Valtorta, Letters to Madre Teresa Maria vol. 2, Centro Editoriale Valtortiano, Isola del Liri FR 2013, pp. 179-180).

Maria Valtorta asserted the fathers Servant of Mary called «scientific» all is clairvoyance instead, spiritic. Calling it this way science was accepted whereas clairvoyance was diabolical, to be rejected beforehand, Maria Valtorta’s thought and attitude is exactly the one of Jesus.

Jesus therefore is not against the Galilean science, for the everyday use, but with whoever calls the Valtorta Work, «scientific» clairvoyant science, that is spiritic, that is demonic Galilean science, the one we learn attending school; therefore, we are not even mentioning it.

But if I extrapolate from the above passage only this sentence:«nobody ever dares to conceal in “scientific” the work I have given you»

and I add:«Valtorta’s work wasn’t scientific because she wasn’t such a genius mind to absorb all the knowledge referring a remote age: that would be unbelievable because it would go beyond the outstanding limit of the human ability».

What do I understand? What conclusions do I have to come to?It’s that Valtorta’s work it’s not scientific from the everyday science! Since in this

sentence it’s not mentioned the clairvoyance concept, it’s obvious that the reader may think to the Galilean science, the one learned by everyone in school.

But Jesus doesn’t recall this at all.He doesn’t blame the science learned in school every day, the Galilean one,

but the clairvoyant, such as spiritic science (that isn’t science indeed).What do I obtain at the end, after the extrapolation of the initial text?I falsify the text we’ve discussed above.The extrapolation could become a trick, if not accurate.In our case the aberration is clear. The sentence written by Maria Valtorta on

February 8, 1949, cut and employed inadequately, covering up the applied formula, making believe that the Valtorta’s Work doesn’t have anything to with the Galilean science. Yes, the one that has generated our automobiles, space voyages, our watch and many other devices. Counterfeit means falsify, making appear what is not.

Counterfeiting (never mind science without even mentioning it) was the one supported by Father Corrado Bert, Prof. Nicola Pende and Prof. Luciano Raffaele, connected by a more or less profound spiritic approval.

As for what we already quoted, Maria Valtorta has always fought clairvoyance because she considered it of diabolical origins, or acted to opening the doors to the enemy, as a result of driving people away from God.

Upcoming Appointments with the Foundation

Maria Valtorta:

The entire Valtorta day will be carried out in the Don Bosco hall at Valdocco, Turin in Maria Ausilia-trice Street, with prayer and broa-dening informative moments about the mystic Maria Valtorta, her wri-tings and her main Work The Gospel as it was revealed to me.Scheduled for the day is the confe-rence of the Foundation President, the musical concert of the artist Iva-no Conti, opening debates during the meeting. In that circumstance our library collection books will be open with the Valtorta’s writings.

We would like to remind you the coming up appointment on January 4, 2019 through radio broadcast: Maria Valtorta her person and her Writings on Radio Maria at 12,30 a.m. Father Ernesto Zucchini ho-sting a direct live program can be called at the following tele-phone number: 031/610.610 by all radio listeners.

On Saturday January 19, 2019Don Bosco hall, Valdocco (Torino) full day dedicated to Maria Valtorta

3

As a matter of fact, since her cousin Giuseppe Belfanti was Pietro Ubaldi’s follower, high expression of the post-spiritism, became himself spiritic walking away from the Church and its sacraments. Falling in this trap he turned to the demon and Maria Valtorta, when she received the gift of seeing its face from God’s point of view, she narrates us she was able to watch in Giuseppe Belfanti’s face the «face of the demon», (consult The Notebooks 1944, August 14 excerpt pg. 524).

Are we able to assert that «Maria Valtorta’s Work is not a scientific writing»?Absolutely no without an adequate explanation. It’s like associate Maria Valtorta

to the various scientific characters. Perhaps imagine her among the flat-hearth believers, the ones who deny science to the point they believe the hearth is a flat extension of land.

Here we are up to the contortion of the way of thinking according to Valtorta with a possible double result: either what Maria Valtorta writes it’s all her artwork and we are face to face with a great literary fiction, but basically false (yet what’s inside shows a different reality); therefore, it was right when they put her on the index in 1960; or we are facing a miracle. As a matter of fact, we claim just this: Maria Valtorta’s writings (however her life as well) are a miracle. And she has to be read and considered just as if she was.

From 2012 on, studies have been published (Lavère and De Caro and all the others), tell us the impossibility of a person, however cultured and bright she might have been, could have written in such a short time an extended Work from all points of view. Whereas here is the point. The miracle that for its nature overwhelms science (even only for definition) and asserts that God has written this text (but still remains a private revelation and nothing more) tells us that this is the only interpretative key of the Valtorta’s matter.

Maria Valtorta could also have been illiterate (and she was much more) like Moses really was, stammered, but when «God’s finger» breaks in everything is possible. Even create the entire Universe from nothing, yes indeed. In her it was like foretell «God’s finger» and this explains what she has written. And this has to be said again and again!

Well, just because we are facing a miracle, asserting that:«Valtorta’s Work is not scientific because she was not such a genius mind

to be able to absorb all the knowledge referred to a remote time: that would be unbelievable because it would exceed the extreme limit of the human capacities» it’s first of all incomprehensible and contradictory because it seems to support that the writings were of Galilean science there should «only» be utilized her talents, Maria Valtorta’s strength and her personal acquaintances. And worse for worse these few sentences do not mention of a miracle, or do not permit the miracle to have a scientific foundation, verifiable, even if it cannot even be benefited from.

And it’s easy to say: “well couldn’t it have been written in a more comprehensive manner….?”

We can then say that Maria Valtorta’s Work is a scientific one from a Galilean’s science? We have to explain ourselves. If I mean to say that is enclosed in the science’s range, certainly not. We should say otherwise that the miracle is scientifically explicable, but this is a contradictory statement and therefore to be declined.

Thought if I state that it’s wrapped of science and it contains definite scientific

PRAYERAsking God for the Public Legitimacy of Maria Valtorta’s

virtues:

O God, endless and eternal Mercy,

who in Maria Valtorta, your humble creature, you have manifested

the wonders of your love. Exalt this daughter of Yours

who accepted to join your Son’s Passion till her

complete consumption in a bed of pain.

O Lord, of inexhaustible goodness,

may the example of your handmaid’s life,

her heroic testimony, her perseverance,

even offering her whole life to convert the hearts of sinners to light up the love of the tepid,

surge charity in everyone.

O Lord, who united to Christ,

the Man-God, that crucified bride,

Maria Valtorta, may the holy Church recognize her virtues

and her mission, and offer it to all the faithful

as a model to imitate, and to seek intercession through her within You.

Through Christ our Lord.

Amen

4

facts, without however take advantage from it, this I can say and I say it with much charge.

But we can then assert that Valtorta’s Work:«Is it the (literary) masterpiece of Love?». Certainly, but provided that this language doesn’t get into the Galilean science

dialectic. It must be cleared out that God’s creation, which is an insuperable masterpiece of Love, it’s also at the same time a masterpiece of science that the same God has placed into creation. Nevertheless, Galilean science doesn’t satisfy it.

To understand each other. Let’s put all the ingredients to make any cake all spread out on a table. Does this explain the cake? No, because the cake it’s their commingling in addition of the human intelligence. Therefore, the cake we eat it’s well superior to all ingredients we put together. However, all the ingredients are there. Same thing is the connection among the expression between God’s love and all the Valtorta’s Work subjects. These are present without ever running out of love. As a matter of fact, science doesn’t ever wear out Love. We should however immediately add that arguing science and love it’s not catholic besides making a nonsense out of it just to claim a sophism.

Are we able to say that: «all information scientifically sure concerning a revelation, if it is demonstrate so by researchers with a straight moral, imbedded by only Science, can it bring to recognize Love?».

Certainly, yes but with this specification. Whether they are men with a high rectitude or not, science speak for itself. National socialist has been champions making use of science and this remains real even if they were awful men and enemies of mankind. Science when it’s science is objective. Full stop. Or else it’s not science. Discovering the laws that rule the universe and know how to use them it’s possible to everyone: bad man or evil ones, with a high rectitude or wicked. Science it’s neutral. It’s up to everybody to make a good or a bad use of it. The clairvoyance instead, since it’s not science, it’s not objective and not for everybody. It’s fickle just like the person who practices it. And whoever makes a use of it, makes always a bad use of his own intellect. It’s exactly what does spiritism do when conjugated.

The fear certainly is that counterposing and arguing Love and Science, we will end up validating somehow worshipping.

Praising is an infantile or degenerative habit belonging to any devotion. Maria Valtorta has donated us an instrument for a new evangelization and not for a different way of worshipping. Love and Science, Faith and Works, Faith and Culture have to proceed one next to the other and weave together, or else the risk is to descend into a worshipping. Turning Maria Valtorta into a supplier of means that justify new ways of worshipping is like falsify her, create confusion, impeding persons from reaching the real and live Jesus.

This Jesus reprimanded to the quibbling’s (The Notebooks 1944, pg. 285): making up quibbles in order to destroy the Valtorta masterpiece.

Counterpose Love and Science it’s like dropping and making others collapse into this entrapment.

Father Ernesto Zucchini

A free Maria Valtorta Foundation’s Newsletter is available by filling your information, clicking here: www.fondazionemariavaltorta.it/it/multimedia_newsletter.php

fondazionemariavaltorta@gmail.comVia Paolina Bonaparte, 51 – 55049 Viareggio (LU)

Maria Valtorta Foundation is glad to inform you that:

You are able to findall videos recorded during

our 2018 Tenth Convention (second International)

in Viareggio inMaria Valtorta Foundation

website

Maria Vision will broadcast the ninth episode of the program:

« Maria Valtorta »Her life, her writings

A gift for mankind

hosted by Father Ernesto Zucchini

We remind you the you may be able to watch Maria Vision Italy

On digital streaming in:Lazio, Campania, Basilicata and Puglia 79

Marche e Umbria 602Sicilia (Trapani) 662or direct streaming:

www.mvloreto.tv/diretta

On Friday January 25 at 7:50 p.m.a replay will be broadcasted

Friday January 11, 2019At 7:50 p.m.