nfb proficio vol 51
DESCRIPTION
financial newsletterTRANSCRIPT
IN THIS ISSUE
From The Ceo’s Desk
Income In A Low
Interest Rate (Low
Return) Environment
Being Active Is Good
For Your Retirement
Health
NFB FINANCIAL UPDATE
Volume51 Aug 2010
FROM THE CEO’s DESK
WOW Mzansi! You guys are GREAT!
Having said that, this is not a time
where politicians and citizens alike
should be gloating. It is a time for
consolidation. Adjectives such as brilliant,
unforgettable and life-changing are the flavour of
the day as we exit a mind blowing month; the
culmination of the joint efforts of Government,
Soccer S.A. and a nation at large. From a rather
doubtful beginning, to rather embarrassing
infighting, to sinkholes in Rosebank, to transport
infrastructure worries and impending labour action,
the list goes on and on; we have not done badly
at all. In fact I'd hazard to call it a resounding
success.
Now all that remains is for all of us, from
government, business, the media and the
population to pledge our commitment to what we
are capable of achieving. I will be asking our
Board of Directors to support me in advertising our
shared pride and belief in this remarkable country
and its people. We need to treat obstacles and
challenges with the same sense of urgency,
ownership and pride we have displayed not only
to the globe, but much more importantly, to
ourselves and each other. Our reputation as a
miracle nation has been bolstered not by yet
another peaceful election, but by a remarkable
event, the biggest of its kind in the world. And
we've done it with grace, uniquely African
character, in a safe way and as one! Most
remarkable to me was the lack of partisan politics
or blame being apportioned. The delivery was all
that hit the headlines, whilst no doubt there were
some difficult discussions taking place behind the
scenes.
The global reach of the money well-spent on
advertising our country and its yet-to-be-
discovered attractions remains to be seen, but
what a stage! On a few occasions, I was
emotionally touched by the service, friendliness
and ownership displayed by folk, employed to
usher us on and off buses and the awesome
Gautrain, to offer us a cool drink, or being given
directions by a traffic officer whilst walking down
the Fan walk in Cape Town. These guys are
supposed to be rude, accept bribes and not care
a damn. Not the one's on duty in the World Cup.
They went out of their way to “Protect and Serve”
and did us all proud. The SAPS also deserve a huge
hug and thanks for doing the impossible i.e.
keeping the peace in an environment where
supporters can get a little testy at times.
The lasting impact of
the Soccer World Cup will
be with us forever. One
hears of a migration of
sporting codes, notably
rugby, to these new world
class facilities. It is up to
South Africans to support
these initiatives and make it
work, not watch others and
criticize from the sidelines.
The attitude between
service providers and
customers was world class
and plenty of people from
the previously negative and
skeptical media, locally and
abroad, have changed their opinion from
doubting Thomas to impressed disciple of Madiba
magic. On this note, it was with a mix of adoration
and worry that I joined the 85 000 spectators to
give this old gentleman a rousing welcome to
Soccer City last night. He looked rather frail, but
that smile still carries the magic that still reflects the
inner strength and magnanimity of this amazing
human being.
Changing tack to markets and the more
mundane, but nevertheless important business: I
remain concerned that these markets still carry an
unusual level of volatility and risk. The globe is an
unsettled place and, until this moderates, I would
advocate caution. NFB has a series of Funds which
we manage through the capable team in our
Asset Management business. These funds, in their
current form, have a track record which has them
delivering outstanding results whilst (and probably
because) they err on the cautious. The results we
as a business are interested in, are three years and
longer in duration as we regard measurement of
shorter periods too vulnerable to “noise”.
Please ask your advisor to discuss these as they
certainly have a place on the smorgasbord of
choices out there and, if blended well with other
top performing funds with a specifically aggressive
or alternatively cautious mandate, can and have
delivered results we are proud of.
AYOBA. They say the time is now, but I have a
feeling it is just beginning!
, CFP
CEO, NFB Financial Services Group
Mike Estment ®
f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s g r o u p
2525
Mike Estment
Big
Sto
ckP
ho
to.c
om
INCOME IN A
ENVIRONMENT
LOW INTEREST RATE (LOW RETURN)
By Stephen
Katzenellenbogen, Private Wealth Manager, NFB Gauteng
When considering various investors and their portfolio objectives they
could loosely be categorized as growth investors, income investors or
a blend thereof. In many instances a portfolio will have both growth
investments and those that provide the investor with an income. This
article will focus on the income investor and will explore current
investment considerations and investment products.
Whilst equity markets have fallen off substantially from
their 2008 highs investors who
have had market exposure, and have had this for a
number of years, have been rewarded with
generous long term returns. Furthermore, those investors (growth)
who still have a long term investment horizon, and those who
picked up some exposure during 2007, should not be too
concerned about current volatility and short term prospects.
Now consider those investors who are unable to watch from the
sidelines and who rely on interest income, or income of another
form; they are faced with a slightly different proposition with interest
rates currently at their lowest level in 30 years coupled with volatile
equity markets still well off their historical highs. In terms of interest
rate prospects we do not expect rates to rise substantially any time
soon; nor do we expect rates to rise, over any time, to the fifteen
and twenty percent levels seen historically.
Before we get in to the detail of our discussion let us look at a
quick example illustrating the effects of income on an investment in
a negative return environment. If you had R100 and took
income/withdrawals equal to 10% over a period where that
investment return was -20% your total investment return for that
period would be -30%. Thus, in order for your, now R70, to get back
to your original R100 you will need a return of 43%.
(see graph below)
(As a side note and potential topic of discussion with your
advisor: there is an inverse relationship between the amount of
income you are taking and your possible exposure to growth assets;
although dependent on your overall portfolio and risk appetite.)
The above example, and discussion, highlights a number of
topics of that will be discussed throughout this article:
- Return expectations – is the past a good predictor of future
returns?
- How much (income) is too much?
- A means to an end…
When attempting to quantify a probable investment return there
are two ways we can go about this:
• Assessing historical returns
• Predicting future returns based on the economic climate and
variables
In reality both the methods above are filled with pitfalls, but do
give us something to work with. In the context of this article we will
venture that a combination of both assessment tools can provide
some insight.
Interest rates are likely to remain low for some time and unlikely
to flirt with low, double digit returns in time to come. When
considering equity markets returns it will take global markets a
number of years to deleverage and work the historical structural
faults out of the system. This is not a doom and gloom scenario, but
rather perhaps a signal to start readjusting our return expectations
to something more muted and commensurate with inflation, interest
rate and future market return expectations. Furthermore, we must
not forget tax and expenses which will impact your investment
return.
A final remark on this topic is that your portfolio will require a
portion of growth assets, commensurate to your risk profile, in order
to provide a measure of inflation protection.
Once comfortable with the likely investment returns the next
step is to, in some cases, adjust downwards what we believe to be
sustainable levels or amounts of income.
When considering what level of income is ‘safe’ or reasonable to
draw from your investment you will need to consider both inflation
and the potential duration of the investment. When pondering
these factors, for this and any other investment, rather err on the
side of caution than have an unwanted surprise should you outlive
your assets.
Either directly or indirectly all of us are affected by inflation
every year through rising medical expenses and a rise in the general
cost of living. This in turn means that year on year we require a bit
more to cover our expenses. Therefore, consideration must be given
to the fact that you will need 5% - 10% more income each year to
carry on with the style of living to which you are accustomed. If you
are currently 60 years old and require R40 000 each month, in 30
years’ time this will translate into an income requirement of R230 000
per month with inflation at 6%. Put another way, R1m today will only
be worth R175 000 in that same 30 years’ time.
When possible, an income level of 1%-5% should allow the asset
to grow beyond the drawings which will then naturally give you
additional income every year. Let us, for illustrative purposes, use an
investor who has R1m and draws income at 3% per annum. Let us
also assume that the investment return in year one is 9% net of costs.
At the beginning of year 1 the client’s income will be equivalent to
R30 000 (3% x R1m) and then at the beginning of year 2 the income
will be R31 800 (R1m + (9%-3%) x 3%).
The older you get the more aggressively you can increase your
income, as reducing your capital base become less of a potential
problem.
All of the above takes careful analysis and forecasting as well as
a thorough understanding of investment markets and vehicles –
please contact your NFB financial advisor for assistance and
thorough planning.
To have a regular income from an investment does not necessarily
mean that it must be a traditional retirement product.
We will not be discussing all of these, but here are some
examples of products that can deliver or supplement income:
• Living annuity
• Compulsory annuity
• Voluntary annuity
• Shares – dividends
• Unit trusts
• Matured endowments
• Structured products
• Income funds
• Dividend income funds
With cash in the bank currently returning around 6%, a dreary bond
outlook and slowing property market, dividend paying shares
provide an interesting alternative.
If you are a marginal tax payer (40%) your current net return on
cash, assuming 6% interest, is 3.6%. (as an aside: have you ever
stopped and considered that cash is the most expensive investment
you have – you earn 6% and the bank ultimately lends your money
out to the guy next door at 10%, thus making a 4% margin?).
Currently, there are a number of shares available displaying
attractive dividend yields – if you were to buy a stock that has a 3%
dividend yield all you then need is a modest 1% capital
appreciation and you are ahead of cash.
These funds provide a very attractive after tax yield for high tax
payers (and corporates), in the form of a dividend. Although
conservative in nature these funds are not without risk, and more
specifically, tax risk. NFB is currently analyzing the dividend income
fund universe and suggest that all current and potential investors
speak to their advisors in order to fully understand the investment
opportunities and possible pitfalls.
If not limited by space it would not be hard to write a few thousand
words on our topic. What is difficult is to temper investor
expectations as well as ignore short term market movements in
favour of a properly aligned long term portfolio.
We look forward to getting your thoughts and input on this
challenging subject.
Shares and dividends
Dividend income funds
Return expectations – is the past agood predictor of future returns?
How much is too much?
A means to an end…
Outcome…of income
A licensed Financial Services Provider
Johannesburg Office:
NFB House 108 Albertyn AvenueWierda Valley 2192,
P O Box 32462 Braamfontein 2017,Tel: (011) 895-8000 Fax: (011) 784-8831
E-mail:Web: www.nfbfinancialservicesgroup.co.za
NFB House 42 Beach RoadNahoon East London 5241,P O Box 8132 Nahoon 5210,
Tel: (043) 735-2000 Fax: (043) 735-2001E-mail:Web: www.nfbec.co.za
:
110 Park Drive Central Port Elizabeth 6001,P O Box 12018 Centrahil 6001,
Tel: (041) 582-3990 Fax: (041) 586-0053E-mail:Web: www.nfbec.co.za
East London Office Port Elizabeth Office:
[email protected] [email protected]@nfbpe.co.za
It would be naive to expect the recessionary consequence to
have hop-scotched one's living annuity, and it would be
hazardous to carry on regardless. Unfortunately, the holding of
thumbs and the ability to quote sound bites from Summit,
although making for interesting debate, is not really adding value to
the management of one of your most important retirement assets.
Active management, which assumes action, is essential, and if ever
there is a time for the dynamics of the working relationship between
advisor and client to take hold, it is in the management of a living
annuity.
The hangover from the historic
Bull Run is the delusional
expectations of an easy income
stream. Three years ago cash was
giving you 11%, and an income rate
of 10 % was sustained with no risk
and a real return on capital left
under the Christmas Tree. But one needs to put this into some sort of
economic context and defer to the lie of the land at that time -
inflation at the beginning of 2008 was sitting at 10% and the Repo
rate was 11%. If we were to mirror the context in today's terms, it
equates to an income of 6% and a cash return of 6.5%. The obvious
conclusion is that a 10 % income stream in today's world comes with
a whole new set of dynamics.
Like any going concern, cash flow is an active element of
management. When demand falters and prices bottom out,
successful business owners focus on their bottom lines, cutting costs,
retrenching and tightening up on the entertainment allowance, all
in a bid to preserve working capital in readiness for when the
shoppers return. One surely needs to copy and paste this ethos into
the Living Annuity strategy.
There are really only three components an investor can
manage:
what risk is one prepared to take in order to sustain income?
how will one invest capital in order to sustain a growing
income stream over the long term?
what rate of income is sustainable without
compromising the appropriate risk mandate (1) and ensuring the
longevity of income stream by growing capital (2)?
In a world where risk is up and
growth is down, cost cutting must
surely be the first responsible step to
take in a bid to protect the longevity
of one's income stream. The reality
of the matter, however, is that not
everyone is in a position to manage
a bottom line, when ultimately, it is managing them.
It is in this space that something has to give; either one
compromises the growth element and focuses on capital
preservation and income generation, or one compromises the risk
element and risks capital erosion in the short term, trusting the
growth assets to adhere to the cyclical nature of the markets. Both
seem reasonable options - but neither is sustainable for a long
period and requires close monitoring together with your advisor.
As mentioned above, one needs to actively assess the world
around us, and adapt accordingly. The good times will come again,
but for the moment, “vasbyt” comes to mind.
1. Risk -
2. Growth -
3. Income -
Active management assumes action – now more vital than ever in
the management of your living annuity. Written by Philip Bartlett,
Private Wealth Manager, NFB East London
Big
Sto
ckP
ho
to.c
om
BEING ACTIVE IS GOOD FOR
if ever there is a time for the dynamics
of the working relationship between
advisor and client to take hold, it is in
the management of a living annuity.
YOURRETIREMENT
HEALTH