nfbr - home | national forum for biological recording wavy golden hairs on the thorax. not all...
TRANSCRIPT
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015
NATIONAL FORUM FOR
BIOLOGICAL RECORDING NFBR
Biological recording in action during the 2015 NFBR Conference
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 2 NFBR
Editorial
This is the 50th NFBR Newsletter As usual we have an excellent selection of articles and
news ndash the world of biological recording is as busy and fast-changing as ever
It was good to see so many NFBR members at our conference back in
April and welcome to the substantial number of new members who
joined us at the conference Feedback indicated that the conference was
a great success thanks to all our excellent speakers and to the many
people who helped organise the conference Paula Lightfoot deserves a
special mention as the driving force behind the conference planning
and NFBR is most grateful to her as well as to the British Ecological
Society for their considerable help and financial support We are
planning to get a conference report circulated before the end of the
year as a record of that event and plans are under way for our 2016
conference
This issue has a focus on the collecting of data on pollinators (pages 8ndash14) which brings
together information on a range of the projects and organisations that are contributing
to the conservation of pollinators and to the governmentrsquos National Pollinator Strategy
Itrsquos not every issue that can announce the birth of a new national recording scheme so
we are pleased to welcome the launch of a scheme devoted to the Calliphoridae a family
of flies that have some intriguing life-histories and are of considerable medical and
forensic importance (page 4) Equally pleasing is an update on progress towards a new
national atlas of mammals the publication of which is keenly awaited (page 15)
NFBR has always worked to represent the interests of recording schemes as an integral
part of biological recording and we are looking at ways of improving our liaison with the
schemes Thanks to members of BSBI we have some good insights into how this might
be done (page 16)
The Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity project at the Field Studies Centre is running some
workshops to introduce biological recording to new participants and it is good to hear
that the first of these is fully booked already (page 19) ndash this along with news that
records on iRecord and iSpot are into the millions is surely a sign that enthusiasm for
biological recording is at a high And our news pages carry details of new and exciting
projects from NBN and from local environmental records centres so there is no shortage
of activity for people to take part in
Finally we have a report on a successful first year for the Identification Trainers project
at the Natural History Museum with details of how you can apply for the new
traineeships offered for the second year
Thanks to all who have contributed words and images for this issue Our next one is due
in early 2016 so please get in touch if you have news reports articles or photos to
share Contact me or share your views more widely via our email discussion forum our
Twitter feed or on our Facebook page And donrsquot forget to check in to the NFBR website
Martin Harvey July 2014
editornfbrorguk
The deadline for sending in articles for newsletter 51 is
1 December 2015
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 3 NFBR
Contents
Editorial 2
Launch of the Calliphoridae Recording Scheme (Olga Retka) 4
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective (Charlie Outhwaite) 6
Bees and pollination ndash building the evidence base 8
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS (Mike Edwards) 9
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging
volunteers in fun science projects (Rob Fowler) 11
Great British Bee Count (Sarah Gabriel) 12
PolliNation (Ruth Staples-Rolfe) 13
BeeWalks (Richard Comont) 14
A new national mammal atlas (Derek Crawley) 15
NFBR and recording schemes (Sarah While) 16
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars (Steve Whitbread) 17
News updates
National Biodiversity Network 18
News snippets 18
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses 19
News from ALERC (Tom Hunt) 20
BRISC 2015 Annual Conference 21
Recording and research 22
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on (Steph West) 23
Cover photo NFBR members recording wildlife at Hatfield Moors SSSI as part of the 2015
NFBR Conference (photo by Paula Lightfoot)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 4 NFBR
Launch of the Calliphoridae Recording Scheme by Olga Retka
The Calliphoridae (blowflies) are
represented in the UK by 38 species
belonging to 7 subfamilies and 14
genera They are highly variable in
appearance and biology
The most familiar blowflies are
bluebottles and greenbottles easily
distinguished by their characteristic
metallic colour Then there are
cluster flies (Polleninae) with their
unusual wavy golden hairs on the
thorax Not all blowflies are so
distinctive however species in the
subfamily Melanomyinae are more
like woodlouse flies
(Rhinophoridae) in appearance
Eurychaeta palpalis can be easily
mistaken for a flesh fly (Sarcophagidae) and Stomorhina lunata even resembles a
hoverfly (Syrphidae) The greenbottles also have some look-alikes among the Tachinidae
and Muscidae Correct identification is not always easy and the keys that are available
are either expensive outdated or difficult to understand The lack of sufficient
identification guides may be one of the reasons why blowflies which on the whole are
widespread and common have been so under-recorded
Although the family as a whole is not well recorded a lot of research has been done on
the species that are forensically or medically important Adult blowflies feed on nectar
and play a role as pollinators but the larval biology is more diverse Larvae from a
number of species feed on carcasses and can be used to establish the post mortem
interval which is the amount of time that has passed
since someonersquos death Other blowfly larvae are
parasites of earthworms grasshoppers slugs snails
etc and in larger animals can cause myiasis This is a
terrifying condition in which eggs are laid and larvae
feed on a live host The most well-known form of it is
sheep strike but they can affect other animals and
humans The more we know about the blowflies the
better we can use their potential and minimise their
negative impact Some larvae are being used in
medicine to clean wounds Others are farmed
commercially for fishing bait or as a source of protein
The scientific importance of blowflies is obvious which
is reason enough to begin a recording scheme One of
the first goals for the scheme is producing a key that
will be accurate and reliable but also easy to use and
affordable It will be a tool for amateur entomologists
as well as professionals with limited knowledge of
Calliphoridae A draft key to subfamilies and species of
forensic importance has already been produced This
key focuses on characters that do not require special
preparation so avoids examination of genitalia
Calliphora vomitoria ndash a common bluebottle the orange haired ldquoginger beardrdquo on the postgena and lower parts of genal dilation (lower part of the head) are characteristic a species of forensic importance
Cynomya mortuorum ndash a species of forensic importance that may also cause myiasis
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 5 NFBR
Characters in the key are well illustrated with
drawings and photographs to minimise identification
errors that could result from the misinterpretation of
written descriptions The key has been based on and
uses features adopted from Rognes (1991)
Erzinccedillioglu (1996) Draber-Mońko (2004) and
Whitworth (2006) The photographs have been
produced using professional equipment kindly
provided by Angela Marmont Centre at the Natural
History Museum The aim for the near future is to add
the remaining (non-forensic) species to complete the
Calliphoridae key
The project has been met with great enthusiasm so
far and has been widely supported by the
entomological community I have received a great
amount of help and advice on collecting preparing
and photographing blowflies and on the
practicalities of running a Recording Scheme for
which I am truly grateful For my part I have been
assisting with specimen identification especially
photographic material published via social media
such as Facebook This is an amazing source of data
happily shared by enthusiasts Once identified the fly records are being sent to iRecord
Sometimes it is impossible to provide an accurate identification based on the
photograph keeping specimens is always advised
The other great source of data are museums and collections So far data have been
collected from the Booth Museum (Brighton) and the Natural History Museum in Oxford
The aim for the coming years is to collect of all of the blowfly data from UK museums In
addition I am hoping to encourage a number of
volunteers to set up blowfly sampling stations
across UK The estimated time span for this
survey project is one year (potentially 2017) with
traps being used for few days each month The
traps will be simple self-assembled and cheap
devices using chicken liver as a bait The
samples will be stored in alcohol (to preserve
DNA for future research) identified and records
used to model the spatial and temporal
distribution of blowflies of forensic importance
As some species are only found in specific
geographical locations and environments they
can be used in forensic cases where body
movement is being suspected
In the near future I am planning to set up a
website where various information on blowflies
could be found including tips on identification
keys recording collecting biology and other
related topics In the meantime I am happy to
receive records via iRecord or email
(arumawppl) If you have any questions do
not hesitate to contact me I am looking forward
to hundreds of new records
Lucilia sericata ndash a common greenbottle a species of forensic importance that also causes sheep strike
Pollenia rudis ndash a cluster fly with characteristic wavy golden hairs
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 6 NFBR
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective
by Charlie Outhwaite
The field of ecology is a vast and varied one As a result the types and quantities of data
produced differ hugely Whether a study is small in scale such as a field or lab based
project or a large country or global scale big data study the amount of data that could
be made available is enormous Yet the field of ecology has been considered as behind
in terms of its openness when compared to other areas of biology such as genomics
With such vast amounts and types of data available sharing that data openly has the
potential to boost research opportunities and open up collaboration within and between
fields
As is the case within many scientific disciplines a major barrier for data sharing in
ecology is the fear of being scooped For this reason many researchers would be
unlikely to release their data until they have been able to complete their intended work
first This problem is exacerbated in ecology where data are often collected
independently by one or a few people who gain a sense of ownership over that data
Although permissions of use and attributions can be set up this sense of ownership can
act as a barrier to data sharing If an ecologist has spent months in the field collecting
and then collating that data they are not going to want to share it until they have had
the chance to carry out all their planned analyses and will probably then hold onto it for
a bit longer just in case
Additional problems that are shared with other areas of research include getting credit
for sharing data and actually knowing how to share data The credit issue is starting to
This article first appeared as a blog post on the DNAdigest website dnadigestorgecological-perspective-on-data-sharing
DNAdigest is a not-for-profit organisation that aims to educate facilitate and engage on issues regarding access to genomic data
ldquoFigsharerdquo one of several options now available for sharing research data online
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 7 NFBR
be addressed by data journals where
citations can be gained as a result of
publishing data With citations often
referred to as the ldquocurrencyrdquo of science
bringing data sharing into this
fundamental aspect of academia is key
Although many options are now
available for easy and hassle free data
sharing this knowledge is not
widespread within the ecological
community It is also considered to be
too time consuming to learn these new
techniques Options available to
ecologists include (among others)
figshare (figsharecom) which can be
used to make data publicly available
and citable and GitHub (githubcom)
which allows the sharing of code as well as the more familiar NBN and GBIF routes for
biological records The tools are available now we need to increase the knowledge on
how to use them and encourage their use in day-to-day research life I personally think
these tools should be introduced during undergraduate courses This would ensure that
future generations of researchers have the basic skills they need to share data
effectively
So far these issues are applicable to most areas of science and it is clear that efforts are
being made to overcome them However ecological data also have unique issues My
work in particular can highlight one such problem I use species presence data collected
by volunteers to investigate changes in the status of biodiversity over time As these
data come from various organisations and groups the views on who owns the data and
whether or not it should be shared can vary Of more importance is the fact that these
data consist of precise localities indicating exactly where species have been recorded
For a common species this shouldnrsquot be a problem but what about threatened or
endangered species Should their locations be openly available Some species are
protected by law and the data relating to these species cannot be used in a study which
could result in the data being accessed by others So what would the protocol be in this
case should the dataset be openly shared which could lead to people tracking down
endangered species and potentially putting these populations at risk What other
options are available Until specific protocols are put in place which aims to understand
and mitigate the potential problems with specific kinds of data many data holders are
likely to simply keep it to themselves
The potential for data sharing within the field of ecology is great The scale and scope of
work that could be achieved would be vastly increased if a more open and sharing
community was possible However as well as the issues that are more widely shared
within science there are a number of issues specific to ecology that need to be
addressed in order for the open data movement to pick up momentum Once these
problems are understood and ways to deal with them are established standardised ways
of sharing should be more accessible and accepted within the community Currently
however I think this lack of data sharing is preventing the generation of new and
exciting research and potentially limiting what we are able to offer from within this field
Charlie Outhwaite is a PhD student based at the Centre for Ecology amp Hydrology Her
work looks into producing biodiversity indicators from biological records exploring
drivers behind the trends and the way species traits affect susceptibility to change
Are there risks from sharing data relating to protected species (Hen Harrier photo by Ingrid Taylar via Flickr Creative Commons)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 8 NFBR
Bees and pollination - building the evidence base
Pollinators and especially bees have really caught the imagination of the public in
recent years with regular articles in the press on the potential decline of both wild bees
and honeybees and what effects this could have on our crops and wild flowers But do
we actually have good evidence to assess how populations are faring for the 270 or so
wild bee species in the UK
Last year the government published its National Pollinator Strategy (Defra 2014) One of
the five priority areas that were identified in the Strategy was developing actions for
ldquoimproving evidence on the status of pollinators and the service they providerdquo This was
broken down further into a series of proposals for investigating the economic value of
pollination the effects of crop protection (eg pesticide use) on pollinators and the
options for improving evidence on the populations of the pollinators themselves
As part of the Strategy Defra awarded a research contract for designing and testing
approaches to monitoring changes in the abundance diversity and distribution of British
pollinators (particularly bees and hoverflies) and pollination services to crops This work
is currently being undertaken by a team that includes scientists from the Centre for
Ecology amp Hydrology Leeds University Reading University and the Open University
expert entomologists (representing BWARS and the Hoverfly Recording Scheme through
the Hymettus consultancy) the Bumblebee Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation
and British Trust for Ornithology
A key element of the project involves looking at how best to build on existing survey
activities to provide robust and reliable data on pollinator population change in addition
to the longer-established recording of species distributions The final output of the
project (ending December 2015) will be to set out a costed framework for monitoring
changes in pollinators and pollination services across Britain into the future with both
professionally-led and volunteer-led components
Many people and organisations have an interest in bees and other pollinators and below
we have compiled information from a range of current activities involving the recording
of bees in one form or another Some of the projects are well-established others are
new but all are gathering information that may help us to understand what is happening
to bees in particular and the broader ecosystem service of pollination
The summaries below demonstrate the breadth of different approaches being taken to
involve wildlife recorders and citizen scientists with work on bees and pollinators The
identification of bees is not straightforward and verifying records can be a time-
consuming task that often places demands on scarce volunteer expertise Alternative
approaches may allow data to be analysed at an lsquoaggregatersquo level looking for overall
trends without having to go to full identification of each species
No doubt each approach will have its own strengths challenges and biases but if good
communications and data-sharing are maintained we should soon have a stronger
framework for generating more and better data on bees which will help identify the best
approaches to conserving pollinators both for their own sake and for the important
services they provide
Bees are not the only insects that pollinate Many other species groups have a role to
play and a number of other recording schemes are involved in work on pollinators
especially the Hoverfly Recording Scheme For reasons of space our feature for NFBR
focuses largely on bees this time round but thatrsquos not to downplay the importance of
other species Read on for some of the recording projects currently in progress
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 2 NFBR
Editorial
This is the 50th NFBR Newsletter As usual we have an excellent selection of articles and
news ndash the world of biological recording is as busy and fast-changing as ever
It was good to see so many NFBR members at our conference back in
April and welcome to the substantial number of new members who
joined us at the conference Feedback indicated that the conference was
a great success thanks to all our excellent speakers and to the many
people who helped organise the conference Paula Lightfoot deserves a
special mention as the driving force behind the conference planning
and NFBR is most grateful to her as well as to the British Ecological
Society for their considerable help and financial support We are
planning to get a conference report circulated before the end of the
year as a record of that event and plans are under way for our 2016
conference
This issue has a focus on the collecting of data on pollinators (pages 8ndash14) which brings
together information on a range of the projects and organisations that are contributing
to the conservation of pollinators and to the governmentrsquos National Pollinator Strategy
Itrsquos not every issue that can announce the birth of a new national recording scheme so
we are pleased to welcome the launch of a scheme devoted to the Calliphoridae a family
of flies that have some intriguing life-histories and are of considerable medical and
forensic importance (page 4) Equally pleasing is an update on progress towards a new
national atlas of mammals the publication of which is keenly awaited (page 15)
NFBR has always worked to represent the interests of recording schemes as an integral
part of biological recording and we are looking at ways of improving our liaison with the
schemes Thanks to members of BSBI we have some good insights into how this might
be done (page 16)
The Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity project at the Field Studies Centre is running some
workshops to introduce biological recording to new participants and it is good to hear
that the first of these is fully booked already (page 19) ndash this along with news that
records on iRecord and iSpot are into the millions is surely a sign that enthusiasm for
biological recording is at a high And our news pages carry details of new and exciting
projects from NBN and from local environmental records centres so there is no shortage
of activity for people to take part in
Finally we have a report on a successful first year for the Identification Trainers project
at the Natural History Museum with details of how you can apply for the new
traineeships offered for the second year
Thanks to all who have contributed words and images for this issue Our next one is due
in early 2016 so please get in touch if you have news reports articles or photos to
share Contact me or share your views more widely via our email discussion forum our
Twitter feed or on our Facebook page And donrsquot forget to check in to the NFBR website
Martin Harvey July 2014
editornfbrorguk
The deadline for sending in articles for newsletter 51 is
1 December 2015
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 3 NFBR
Contents
Editorial 2
Launch of the Calliphoridae Recording Scheme (Olga Retka) 4
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective (Charlie Outhwaite) 6
Bees and pollination ndash building the evidence base 8
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS (Mike Edwards) 9
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging
volunteers in fun science projects (Rob Fowler) 11
Great British Bee Count (Sarah Gabriel) 12
PolliNation (Ruth Staples-Rolfe) 13
BeeWalks (Richard Comont) 14
A new national mammal atlas (Derek Crawley) 15
NFBR and recording schemes (Sarah While) 16
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars (Steve Whitbread) 17
News updates
National Biodiversity Network 18
News snippets 18
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses 19
News from ALERC (Tom Hunt) 20
BRISC 2015 Annual Conference 21
Recording and research 22
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on (Steph West) 23
Cover photo NFBR members recording wildlife at Hatfield Moors SSSI as part of the 2015
NFBR Conference (photo by Paula Lightfoot)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 4 NFBR
Launch of the Calliphoridae Recording Scheme by Olga Retka
The Calliphoridae (blowflies) are
represented in the UK by 38 species
belonging to 7 subfamilies and 14
genera They are highly variable in
appearance and biology
The most familiar blowflies are
bluebottles and greenbottles easily
distinguished by their characteristic
metallic colour Then there are
cluster flies (Polleninae) with their
unusual wavy golden hairs on the
thorax Not all blowflies are so
distinctive however species in the
subfamily Melanomyinae are more
like woodlouse flies
(Rhinophoridae) in appearance
Eurychaeta palpalis can be easily
mistaken for a flesh fly (Sarcophagidae) and Stomorhina lunata even resembles a
hoverfly (Syrphidae) The greenbottles also have some look-alikes among the Tachinidae
and Muscidae Correct identification is not always easy and the keys that are available
are either expensive outdated or difficult to understand The lack of sufficient
identification guides may be one of the reasons why blowflies which on the whole are
widespread and common have been so under-recorded
Although the family as a whole is not well recorded a lot of research has been done on
the species that are forensically or medically important Adult blowflies feed on nectar
and play a role as pollinators but the larval biology is more diverse Larvae from a
number of species feed on carcasses and can be used to establish the post mortem
interval which is the amount of time that has passed
since someonersquos death Other blowfly larvae are
parasites of earthworms grasshoppers slugs snails
etc and in larger animals can cause myiasis This is a
terrifying condition in which eggs are laid and larvae
feed on a live host The most well-known form of it is
sheep strike but they can affect other animals and
humans The more we know about the blowflies the
better we can use their potential and minimise their
negative impact Some larvae are being used in
medicine to clean wounds Others are farmed
commercially for fishing bait or as a source of protein
The scientific importance of blowflies is obvious which
is reason enough to begin a recording scheme One of
the first goals for the scheme is producing a key that
will be accurate and reliable but also easy to use and
affordable It will be a tool for amateur entomologists
as well as professionals with limited knowledge of
Calliphoridae A draft key to subfamilies and species of
forensic importance has already been produced This
key focuses on characters that do not require special
preparation so avoids examination of genitalia
Calliphora vomitoria ndash a common bluebottle the orange haired ldquoginger beardrdquo on the postgena and lower parts of genal dilation (lower part of the head) are characteristic a species of forensic importance
Cynomya mortuorum ndash a species of forensic importance that may also cause myiasis
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 5 NFBR
Characters in the key are well illustrated with
drawings and photographs to minimise identification
errors that could result from the misinterpretation of
written descriptions The key has been based on and
uses features adopted from Rognes (1991)
Erzinccedillioglu (1996) Draber-Mońko (2004) and
Whitworth (2006) The photographs have been
produced using professional equipment kindly
provided by Angela Marmont Centre at the Natural
History Museum The aim for the near future is to add
the remaining (non-forensic) species to complete the
Calliphoridae key
The project has been met with great enthusiasm so
far and has been widely supported by the
entomological community I have received a great
amount of help and advice on collecting preparing
and photographing blowflies and on the
practicalities of running a Recording Scheme for
which I am truly grateful For my part I have been
assisting with specimen identification especially
photographic material published via social media
such as Facebook This is an amazing source of data
happily shared by enthusiasts Once identified the fly records are being sent to iRecord
Sometimes it is impossible to provide an accurate identification based on the
photograph keeping specimens is always advised
The other great source of data are museums and collections So far data have been
collected from the Booth Museum (Brighton) and the Natural History Museum in Oxford
The aim for the coming years is to collect of all of the blowfly data from UK museums In
addition I am hoping to encourage a number of
volunteers to set up blowfly sampling stations
across UK The estimated time span for this
survey project is one year (potentially 2017) with
traps being used for few days each month The
traps will be simple self-assembled and cheap
devices using chicken liver as a bait The
samples will be stored in alcohol (to preserve
DNA for future research) identified and records
used to model the spatial and temporal
distribution of blowflies of forensic importance
As some species are only found in specific
geographical locations and environments they
can be used in forensic cases where body
movement is being suspected
In the near future I am planning to set up a
website where various information on blowflies
could be found including tips on identification
keys recording collecting biology and other
related topics In the meantime I am happy to
receive records via iRecord or email
(arumawppl) If you have any questions do
not hesitate to contact me I am looking forward
to hundreds of new records
Lucilia sericata ndash a common greenbottle a species of forensic importance that also causes sheep strike
Pollenia rudis ndash a cluster fly with characteristic wavy golden hairs
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 6 NFBR
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective
by Charlie Outhwaite
The field of ecology is a vast and varied one As a result the types and quantities of data
produced differ hugely Whether a study is small in scale such as a field or lab based
project or a large country or global scale big data study the amount of data that could
be made available is enormous Yet the field of ecology has been considered as behind
in terms of its openness when compared to other areas of biology such as genomics
With such vast amounts and types of data available sharing that data openly has the
potential to boost research opportunities and open up collaboration within and between
fields
As is the case within many scientific disciplines a major barrier for data sharing in
ecology is the fear of being scooped For this reason many researchers would be
unlikely to release their data until they have been able to complete their intended work
first This problem is exacerbated in ecology where data are often collected
independently by one or a few people who gain a sense of ownership over that data
Although permissions of use and attributions can be set up this sense of ownership can
act as a barrier to data sharing If an ecologist has spent months in the field collecting
and then collating that data they are not going to want to share it until they have had
the chance to carry out all their planned analyses and will probably then hold onto it for
a bit longer just in case
Additional problems that are shared with other areas of research include getting credit
for sharing data and actually knowing how to share data The credit issue is starting to
This article first appeared as a blog post on the DNAdigest website dnadigestorgecological-perspective-on-data-sharing
DNAdigest is a not-for-profit organisation that aims to educate facilitate and engage on issues regarding access to genomic data
ldquoFigsharerdquo one of several options now available for sharing research data online
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 7 NFBR
be addressed by data journals where
citations can be gained as a result of
publishing data With citations often
referred to as the ldquocurrencyrdquo of science
bringing data sharing into this
fundamental aspect of academia is key
Although many options are now
available for easy and hassle free data
sharing this knowledge is not
widespread within the ecological
community It is also considered to be
too time consuming to learn these new
techniques Options available to
ecologists include (among others)
figshare (figsharecom) which can be
used to make data publicly available
and citable and GitHub (githubcom)
which allows the sharing of code as well as the more familiar NBN and GBIF routes for
biological records The tools are available now we need to increase the knowledge on
how to use them and encourage their use in day-to-day research life I personally think
these tools should be introduced during undergraduate courses This would ensure that
future generations of researchers have the basic skills they need to share data
effectively
So far these issues are applicable to most areas of science and it is clear that efforts are
being made to overcome them However ecological data also have unique issues My
work in particular can highlight one such problem I use species presence data collected
by volunteers to investigate changes in the status of biodiversity over time As these
data come from various organisations and groups the views on who owns the data and
whether or not it should be shared can vary Of more importance is the fact that these
data consist of precise localities indicating exactly where species have been recorded
For a common species this shouldnrsquot be a problem but what about threatened or
endangered species Should their locations be openly available Some species are
protected by law and the data relating to these species cannot be used in a study which
could result in the data being accessed by others So what would the protocol be in this
case should the dataset be openly shared which could lead to people tracking down
endangered species and potentially putting these populations at risk What other
options are available Until specific protocols are put in place which aims to understand
and mitigate the potential problems with specific kinds of data many data holders are
likely to simply keep it to themselves
The potential for data sharing within the field of ecology is great The scale and scope of
work that could be achieved would be vastly increased if a more open and sharing
community was possible However as well as the issues that are more widely shared
within science there are a number of issues specific to ecology that need to be
addressed in order for the open data movement to pick up momentum Once these
problems are understood and ways to deal with them are established standardised ways
of sharing should be more accessible and accepted within the community Currently
however I think this lack of data sharing is preventing the generation of new and
exciting research and potentially limiting what we are able to offer from within this field
Charlie Outhwaite is a PhD student based at the Centre for Ecology amp Hydrology Her
work looks into producing biodiversity indicators from biological records exploring
drivers behind the trends and the way species traits affect susceptibility to change
Are there risks from sharing data relating to protected species (Hen Harrier photo by Ingrid Taylar via Flickr Creative Commons)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 8 NFBR
Bees and pollination - building the evidence base
Pollinators and especially bees have really caught the imagination of the public in
recent years with regular articles in the press on the potential decline of both wild bees
and honeybees and what effects this could have on our crops and wild flowers But do
we actually have good evidence to assess how populations are faring for the 270 or so
wild bee species in the UK
Last year the government published its National Pollinator Strategy (Defra 2014) One of
the five priority areas that were identified in the Strategy was developing actions for
ldquoimproving evidence on the status of pollinators and the service they providerdquo This was
broken down further into a series of proposals for investigating the economic value of
pollination the effects of crop protection (eg pesticide use) on pollinators and the
options for improving evidence on the populations of the pollinators themselves
As part of the Strategy Defra awarded a research contract for designing and testing
approaches to monitoring changes in the abundance diversity and distribution of British
pollinators (particularly bees and hoverflies) and pollination services to crops This work
is currently being undertaken by a team that includes scientists from the Centre for
Ecology amp Hydrology Leeds University Reading University and the Open University
expert entomologists (representing BWARS and the Hoverfly Recording Scheme through
the Hymettus consultancy) the Bumblebee Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation
and British Trust for Ornithology
A key element of the project involves looking at how best to build on existing survey
activities to provide robust and reliable data on pollinator population change in addition
to the longer-established recording of species distributions The final output of the
project (ending December 2015) will be to set out a costed framework for monitoring
changes in pollinators and pollination services across Britain into the future with both
professionally-led and volunteer-led components
Many people and organisations have an interest in bees and other pollinators and below
we have compiled information from a range of current activities involving the recording
of bees in one form or another Some of the projects are well-established others are
new but all are gathering information that may help us to understand what is happening
to bees in particular and the broader ecosystem service of pollination
The summaries below demonstrate the breadth of different approaches being taken to
involve wildlife recorders and citizen scientists with work on bees and pollinators The
identification of bees is not straightforward and verifying records can be a time-
consuming task that often places demands on scarce volunteer expertise Alternative
approaches may allow data to be analysed at an lsquoaggregatersquo level looking for overall
trends without having to go to full identification of each species
No doubt each approach will have its own strengths challenges and biases but if good
communications and data-sharing are maintained we should soon have a stronger
framework for generating more and better data on bees which will help identify the best
approaches to conserving pollinators both for their own sake and for the important
services they provide
Bees are not the only insects that pollinate Many other species groups have a role to
play and a number of other recording schemes are involved in work on pollinators
especially the Hoverfly Recording Scheme For reasons of space our feature for NFBR
focuses largely on bees this time round but thatrsquos not to downplay the importance of
other species Read on for some of the recording projects currently in progress
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 3 NFBR
Contents
Editorial 2
Launch of the Calliphoridae Recording Scheme (Olga Retka) 4
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective (Charlie Outhwaite) 6
Bees and pollination ndash building the evidence base 8
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS (Mike Edwards) 9
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging
volunteers in fun science projects (Rob Fowler) 11
Great British Bee Count (Sarah Gabriel) 12
PolliNation (Ruth Staples-Rolfe) 13
BeeWalks (Richard Comont) 14
A new national mammal atlas (Derek Crawley) 15
NFBR and recording schemes (Sarah While) 16
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars (Steve Whitbread) 17
News updates
National Biodiversity Network 18
News snippets 18
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses 19
News from ALERC (Tom Hunt) 20
BRISC 2015 Annual Conference 21
Recording and research 22
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on (Steph West) 23
Cover photo NFBR members recording wildlife at Hatfield Moors SSSI as part of the 2015
NFBR Conference (photo by Paula Lightfoot)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 4 NFBR
Launch of the Calliphoridae Recording Scheme by Olga Retka
The Calliphoridae (blowflies) are
represented in the UK by 38 species
belonging to 7 subfamilies and 14
genera They are highly variable in
appearance and biology
The most familiar blowflies are
bluebottles and greenbottles easily
distinguished by their characteristic
metallic colour Then there are
cluster flies (Polleninae) with their
unusual wavy golden hairs on the
thorax Not all blowflies are so
distinctive however species in the
subfamily Melanomyinae are more
like woodlouse flies
(Rhinophoridae) in appearance
Eurychaeta palpalis can be easily
mistaken for a flesh fly (Sarcophagidae) and Stomorhina lunata even resembles a
hoverfly (Syrphidae) The greenbottles also have some look-alikes among the Tachinidae
and Muscidae Correct identification is not always easy and the keys that are available
are either expensive outdated or difficult to understand The lack of sufficient
identification guides may be one of the reasons why blowflies which on the whole are
widespread and common have been so under-recorded
Although the family as a whole is not well recorded a lot of research has been done on
the species that are forensically or medically important Adult blowflies feed on nectar
and play a role as pollinators but the larval biology is more diverse Larvae from a
number of species feed on carcasses and can be used to establish the post mortem
interval which is the amount of time that has passed
since someonersquos death Other blowfly larvae are
parasites of earthworms grasshoppers slugs snails
etc and in larger animals can cause myiasis This is a
terrifying condition in which eggs are laid and larvae
feed on a live host The most well-known form of it is
sheep strike but they can affect other animals and
humans The more we know about the blowflies the
better we can use their potential and minimise their
negative impact Some larvae are being used in
medicine to clean wounds Others are farmed
commercially for fishing bait or as a source of protein
The scientific importance of blowflies is obvious which
is reason enough to begin a recording scheme One of
the first goals for the scheme is producing a key that
will be accurate and reliable but also easy to use and
affordable It will be a tool for amateur entomologists
as well as professionals with limited knowledge of
Calliphoridae A draft key to subfamilies and species of
forensic importance has already been produced This
key focuses on characters that do not require special
preparation so avoids examination of genitalia
Calliphora vomitoria ndash a common bluebottle the orange haired ldquoginger beardrdquo on the postgena and lower parts of genal dilation (lower part of the head) are characteristic a species of forensic importance
Cynomya mortuorum ndash a species of forensic importance that may also cause myiasis
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 5 NFBR
Characters in the key are well illustrated with
drawings and photographs to minimise identification
errors that could result from the misinterpretation of
written descriptions The key has been based on and
uses features adopted from Rognes (1991)
Erzinccedillioglu (1996) Draber-Mońko (2004) and
Whitworth (2006) The photographs have been
produced using professional equipment kindly
provided by Angela Marmont Centre at the Natural
History Museum The aim for the near future is to add
the remaining (non-forensic) species to complete the
Calliphoridae key
The project has been met with great enthusiasm so
far and has been widely supported by the
entomological community I have received a great
amount of help and advice on collecting preparing
and photographing blowflies and on the
practicalities of running a Recording Scheme for
which I am truly grateful For my part I have been
assisting with specimen identification especially
photographic material published via social media
such as Facebook This is an amazing source of data
happily shared by enthusiasts Once identified the fly records are being sent to iRecord
Sometimes it is impossible to provide an accurate identification based on the
photograph keeping specimens is always advised
The other great source of data are museums and collections So far data have been
collected from the Booth Museum (Brighton) and the Natural History Museum in Oxford
The aim for the coming years is to collect of all of the blowfly data from UK museums In
addition I am hoping to encourage a number of
volunteers to set up blowfly sampling stations
across UK The estimated time span for this
survey project is one year (potentially 2017) with
traps being used for few days each month The
traps will be simple self-assembled and cheap
devices using chicken liver as a bait The
samples will be stored in alcohol (to preserve
DNA for future research) identified and records
used to model the spatial and temporal
distribution of blowflies of forensic importance
As some species are only found in specific
geographical locations and environments they
can be used in forensic cases where body
movement is being suspected
In the near future I am planning to set up a
website where various information on blowflies
could be found including tips on identification
keys recording collecting biology and other
related topics In the meantime I am happy to
receive records via iRecord or email
(arumawppl) If you have any questions do
not hesitate to contact me I am looking forward
to hundreds of new records
Lucilia sericata ndash a common greenbottle a species of forensic importance that also causes sheep strike
Pollenia rudis ndash a cluster fly with characteristic wavy golden hairs
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 6 NFBR
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective
by Charlie Outhwaite
The field of ecology is a vast and varied one As a result the types and quantities of data
produced differ hugely Whether a study is small in scale such as a field or lab based
project or a large country or global scale big data study the amount of data that could
be made available is enormous Yet the field of ecology has been considered as behind
in terms of its openness when compared to other areas of biology such as genomics
With such vast amounts and types of data available sharing that data openly has the
potential to boost research opportunities and open up collaboration within and between
fields
As is the case within many scientific disciplines a major barrier for data sharing in
ecology is the fear of being scooped For this reason many researchers would be
unlikely to release their data until they have been able to complete their intended work
first This problem is exacerbated in ecology where data are often collected
independently by one or a few people who gain a sense of ownership over that data
Although permissions of use and attributions can be set up this sense of ownership can
act as a barrier to data sharing If an ecologist has spent months in the field collecting
and then collating that data they are not going to want to share it until they have had
the chance to carry out all their planned analyses and will probably then hold onto it for
a bit longer just in case
Additional problems that are shared with other areas of research include getting credit
for sharing data and actually knowing how to share data The credit issue is starting to
This article first appeared as a blog post on the DNAdigest website dnadigestorgecological-perspective-on-data-sharing
DNAdigest is a not-for-profit organisation that aims to educate facilitate and engage on issues regarding access to genomic data
ldquoFigsharerdquo one of several options now available for sharing research data online
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 7 NFBR
be addressed by data journals where
citations can be gained as a result of
publishing data With citations often
referred to as the ldquocurrencyrdquo of science
bringing data sharing into this
fundamental aspect of academia is key
Although many options are now
available for easy and hassle free data
sharing this knowledge is not
widespread within the ecological
community It is also considered to be
too time consuming to learn these new
techniques Options available to
ecologists include (among others)
figshare (figsharecom) which can be
used to make data publicly available
and citable and GitHub (githubcom)
which allows the sharing of code as well as the more familiar NBN and GBIF routes for
biological records The tools are available now we need to increase the knowledge on
how to use them and encourage their use in day-to-day research life I personally think
these tools should be introduced during undergraduate courses This would ensure that
future generations of researchers have the basic skills they need to share data
effectively
So far these issues are applicable to most areas of science and it is clear that efforts are
being made to overcome them However ecological data also have unique issues My
work in particular can highlight one such problem I use species presence data collected
by volunteers to investigate changes in the status of biodiversity over time As these
data come from various organisations and groups the views on who owns the data and
whether or not it should be shared can vary Of more importance is the fact that these
data consist of precise localities indicating exactly where species have been recorded
For a common species this shouldnrsquot be a problem but what about threatened or
endangered species Should their locations be openly available Some species are
protected by law and the data relating to these species cannot be used in a study which
could result in the data being accessed by others So what would the protocol be in this
case should the dataset be openly shared which could lead to people tracking down
endangered species and potentially putting these populations at risk What other
options are available Until specific protocols are put in place which aims to understand
and mitigate the potential problems with specific kinds of data many data holders are
likely to simply keep it to themselves
The potential for data sharing within the field of ecology is great The scale and scope of
work that could be achieved would be vastly increased if a more open and sharing
community was possible However as well as the issues that are more widely shared
within science there are a number of issues specific to ecology that need to be
addressed in order for the open data movement to pick up momentum Once these
problems are understood and ways to deal with them are established standardised ways
of sharing should be more accessible and accepted within the community Currently
however I think this lack of data sharing is preventing the generation of new and
exciting research and potentially limiting what we are able to offer from within this field
Charlie Outhwaite is a PhD student based at the Centre for Ecology amp Hydrology Her
work looks into producing biodiversity indicators from biological records exploring
drivers behind the trends and the way species traits affect susceptibility to change
Are there risks from sharing data relating to protected species (Hen Harrier photo by Ingrid Taylar via Flickr Creative Commons)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 8 NFBR
Bees and pollination - building the evidence base
Pollinators and especially bees have really caught the imagination of the public in
recent years with regular articles in the press on the potential decline of both wild bees
and honeybees and what effects this could have on our crops and wild flowers But do
we actually have good evidence to assess how populations are faring for the 270 or so
wild bee species in the UK
Last year the government published its National Pollinator Strategy (Defra 2014) One of
the five priority areas that were identified in the Strategy was developing actions for
ldquoimproving evidence on the status of pollinators and the service they providerdquo This was
broken down further into a series of proposals for investigating the economic value of
pollination the effects of crop protection (eg pesticide use) on pollinators and the
options for improving evidence on the populations of the pollinators themselves
As part of the Strategy Defra awarded a research contract for designing and testing
approaches to monitoring changes in the abundance diversity and distribution of British
pollinators (particularly bees and hoverflies) and pollination services to crops This work
is currently being undertaken by a team that includes scientists from the Centre for
Ecology amp Hydrology Leeds University Reading University and the Open University
expert entomologists (representing BWARS and the Hoverfly Recording Scheme through
the Hymettus consultancy) the Bumblebee Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation
and British Trust for Ornithology
A key element of the project involves looking at how best to build on existing survey
activities to provide robust and reliable data on pollinator population change in addition
to the longer-established recording of species distributions The final output of the
project (ending December 2015) will be to set out a costed framework for monitoring
changes in pollinators and pollination services across Britain into the future with both
professionally-led and volunteer-led components
Many people and organisations have an interest in bees and other pollinators and below
we have compiled information from a range of current activities involving the recording
of bees in one form or another Some of the projects are well-established others are
new but all are gathering information that may help us to understand what is happening
to bees in particular and the broader ecosystem service of pollination
The summaries below demonstrate the breadth of different approaches being taken to
involve wildlife recorders and citizen scientists with work on bees and pollinators The
identification of bees is not straightforward and verifying records can be a time-
consuming task that often places demands on scarce volunteer expertise Alternative
approaches may allow data to be analysed at an lsquoaggregatersquo level looking for overall
trends without having to go to full identification of each species
No doubt each approach will have its own strengths challenges and biases but if good
communications and data-sharing are maintained we should soon have a stronger
framework for generating more and better data on bees which will help identify the best
approaches to conserving pollinators both for their own sake and for the important
services they provide
Bees are not the only insects that pollinate Many other species groups have a role to
play and a number of other recording schemes are involved in work on pollinators
especially the Hoverfly Recording Scheme For reasons of space our feature for NFBR
focuses largely on bees this time round but thatrsquos not to downplay the importance of
other species Read on for some of the recording projects currently in progress
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 4 NFBR
Launch of the Calliphoridae Recording Scheme by Olga Retka
The Calliphoridae (blowflies) are
represented in the UK by 38 species
belonging to 7 subfamilies and 14
genera They are highly variable in
appearance and biology
The most familiar blowflies are
bluebottles and greenbottles easily
distinguished by their characteristic
metallic colour Then there are
cluster flies (Polleninae) with their
unusual wavy golden hairs on the
thorax Not all blowflies are so
distinctive however species in the
subfamily Melanomyinae are more
like woodlouse flies
(Rhinophoridae) in appearance
Eurychaeta palpalis can be easily
mistaken for a flesh fly (Sarcophagidae) and Stomorhina lunata even resembles a
hoverfly (Syrphidae) The greenbottles also have some look-alikes among the Tachinidae
and Muscidae Correct identification is not always easy and the keys that are available
are either expensive outdated or difficult to understand The lack of sufficient
identification guides may be one of the reasons why blowflies which on the whole are
widespread and common have been so under-recorded
Although the family as a whole is not well recorded a lot of research has been done on
the species that are forensically or medically important Adult blowflies feed on nectar
and play a role as pollinators but the larval biology is more diverse Larvae from a
number of species feed on carcasses and can be used to establish the post mortem
interval which is the amount of time that has passed
since someonersquos death Other blowfly larvae are
parasites of earthworms grasshoppers slugs snails
etc and in larger animals can cause myiasis This is a
terrifying condition in which eggs are laid and larvae
feed on a live host The most well-known form of it is
sheep strike but they can affect other animals and
humans The more we know about the blowflies the
better we can use their potential and minimise their
negative impact Some larvae are being used in
medicine to clean wounds Others are farmed
commercially for fishing bait or as a source of protein
The scientific importance of blowflies is obvious which
is reason enough to begin a recording scheme One of
the first goals for the scheme is producing a key that
will be accurate and reliable but also easy to use and
affordable It will be a tool for amateur entomologists
as well as professionals with limited knowledge of
Calliphoridae A draft key to subfamilies and species of
forensic importance has already been produced This
key focuses on characters that do not require special
preparation so avoids examination of genitalia
Calliphora vomitoria ndash a common bluebottle the orange haired ldquoginger beardrdquo on the postgena and lower parts of genal dilation (lower part of the head) are characteristic a species of forensic importance
Cynomya mortuorum ndash a species of forensic importance that may also cause myiasis
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 5 NFBR
Characters in the key are well illustrated with
drawings and photographs to minimise identification
errors that could result from the misinterpretation of
written descriptions The key has been based on and
uses features adopted from Rognes (1991)
Erzinccedillioglu (1996) Draber-Mońko (2004) and
Whitworth (2006) The photographs have been
produced using professional equipment kindly
provided by Angela Marmont Centre at the Natural
History Museum The aim for the near future is to add
the remaining (non-forensic) species to complete the
Calliphoridae key
The project has been met with great enthusiasm so
far and has been widely supported by the
entomological community I have received a great
amount of help and advice on collecting preparing
and photographing blowflies and on the
practicalities of running a Recording Scheme for
which I am truly grateful For my part I have been
assisting with specimen identification especially
photographic material published via social media
such as Facebook This is an amazing source of data
happily shared by enthusiasts Once identified the fly records are being sent to iRecord
Sometimes it is impossible to provide an accurate identification based on the
photograph keeping specimens is always advised
The other great source of data are museums and collections So far data have been
collected from the Booth Museum (Brighton) and the Natural History Museum in Oxford
The aim for the coming years is to collect of all of the blowfly data from UK museums In
addition I am hoping to encourage a number of
volunteers to set up blowfly sampling stations
across UK The estimated time span for this
survey project is one year (potentially 2017) with
traps being used for few days each month The
traps will be simple self-assembled and cheap
devices using chicken liver as a bait The
samples will be stored in alcohol (to preserve
DNA for future research) identified and records
used to model the spatial and temporal
distribution of blowflies of forensic importance
As some species are only found in specific
geographical locations and environments they
can be used in forensic cases where body
movement is being suspected
In the near future I am planning to set up a
website where various information on blowflies
could be found including tips on identification
keys recording collecting biology and other
related topics In the meantime I am happy to
receive records via iRecord or email
(arumawppl) If you have any questions do
not hesitate to contact me I am looking forward
to hundreds of new records
Lucilia sericata ndash a common greenbottle a species of forensic importance that also causes sheep strike
Pollenia rudis ndash a cluster fly with characteristic wavy golden hairs
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 6 NFBR
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective
by Charlie Outhwaite
The field of ecology is a vast and varied one As a result the types and quantities of data
produced differ hugely Whether a study is small in scale such as a field or lab based
project or a large country or global scale big data study the amount of data that could
be made available is enormous Yet the field of ecology has been considered as behind
in terms of its openness when compared to other areas of biology such as genomics
With such vast amounts and types of data available sharing that data openly has the
potential to boost research opportunities and open up collaboration within and between
fields
As is the case within many scientific disciplines a major barrier for data sharing in
ecology is the fear of being scooped For this reason many researchers would be
unlikely to release their data until they have been able to complete their intended work
first This problem is exacerbated in ecology where data are often collected
independently by one or a few people who gain a sense of ownership over that data
Although permissions of use and attributions can be set up this sense of ownership can
act as a barrier to data sharing If an ecologist has spent months in the field collecting
and then collating that data they are not going to want to share it until they have had
the chance to carry out all their planned analyses and will probably then hold onto it for
a bit longer just in case
Additional problems that are shared with other areas of research include getting credit
for sharing data and actually knowing how to share data The credit issue is starting to
This article first appeared as a blog post on the DNAdigest website dnadigestorgecological-perspective-on-data-sharing
DNAdigest is a not-for-profit organisation that aims to educate facilitate and engage on issues regarding access to genomic data
ldquoFigsharerdquo one of several options now available for sharing research data online
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 7 NFBR
be addressed by data journals where
citations can be gained as a result of
publishing data With citations often
referred to as the ldquocurrencyrdquo of science
bringing data sharing into this
fundamental aspect of academia is key
Although many options are now
available for easy and hassle free data
sharing this knowledge is not
widespread within the ecological
community It is also considered to be
too time consuming to learn these new
techniques Options available to
ecologists include (among others)
figshare (figsharecom) which can be
used to make data publicly available
and citable and GitHub (githubcom)
which allows the sharing of code as well as the more familiar NBN and GBIF routes for
biological records The tools are available now we need to increase the knowledge on
how to use them and encourage their use in day-to-day research life I personally think
these tools should be introduced during undergraduate courses This would ensure that
future generations of researchers have the basic skills they need to share data
effectively
So far these issues are applicable to most areas of science and it is clear that efforts are
being made to overcome them However ecological data also have unique issues My
work in particular can highlight one such problem I use species presence data collected
by volunteers to investigate changes in the status of biodiversity over time As these
data come from various organisations and groups the views on who owns the data and
whether or not it should be shared can vary Of more importance is the fact that these
data consist of precise localities indicating exactly where species have been recorded
For a common species this shouldnrsquot be a problem but what about threatened or
endangered species Should their locations be openly available Some species are
protected by law and the data relating to these species cannot be used in a study which
could result in the data being accessed by others So what would the protocol be in this
case should the dataset be openly shared which could lead to people tracking down
endangered species and potentially putting these populations at risk What other
options are available Until specific protocols are put in place which aims to understand
and mitigate the potential problems with specific kinds of data many data holders are
likely to simply keep it to themselves
The potential for data sharing within the field of ecology is great The scale and scope of
work that could be achieved would be vastly increased if a more open and sharing
community was possible However as well as the issues that are more widely shared
within science there are a number of issues specific to ecology that need to be
addressed in order for the open data movement to pick up momentum Once these
problems are understood and ways to deal with them are established standardised ways
of sharing should be more accessible and accepted within the community Currently
however I think this lack of data sharing is preventing the generation of new and
exciting research and potentially limiting what we are able to offer from within this field
Charlie Outhwaite is a PhD student based at the Centre for Ecology amp Hydrology Her
work looks into producing biodiversity indicators from biological records exploring
drivers behind the trends and the way species traits affect susceptibility to change
Are there risks from sharing data relating to protected species (Hen Harrier photo by Ingrid Taylar via Flickr Creative Commons)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 8 NFBR
Bees and pollination - building the evidence base
Pollinators and especially bees have really caught the imagination of the public in
recent years with regular articles in the press on the potential decline of both wild bees
and honeybees and what effects this could have on our crops and wild flowers But do
we actually have good evidence to assess how populations are faring for the 270 or so
wild bee species in the UK
Last year the government published its National Pollinator Strategy (Defra 2014) One of
the five priority areas that were identified in the Strategy was developing actions for
ldquoimproving evidence on the status of pollinators and the service they providerdquo This was
broken down further into a series of proposals for investigating the economic value of
pollination the effects of crop protection (eg pesticide use) on pollinators and the
options for improving evidence on the populations of the pollinators themselves
As part of the Strategy Defra awarded a research contract for designing and testing
approaches to monitoring changes in the abundance diversity and distribution of British
pollinators (particularly bees and hoverflies) and pollination services to crops This work
is currently being undertaken by a team that includes scientists from the Centre for
Ecology amp Hydrology Leeds University Reading University and the Open University
expert entomologists (representing BWARS and the Hoverfly Recording Scheme through
the Hymettus consultancy) the Bumblebee Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation
and British Trust for Ornithology
A key element of the project involves looking at how best to build on existing survey
activities to provide robust and reliable data on pollinator population change in addition
to the longer-established recording of species distributions The final output of the
project (ending December 2015) will be to set out a costed framework for monitoring
changes in pollinators and pollination services across Britain into the future with both
professionally-led and volunteer-led components
Many people and organisations have an interest in bees and other pollinators and below
we have compiled information from a range of current activities involving the recording
of bees in one form or another Some of the projects are well-established others are
new but all are gathering information that may help us to understand what is happening
to bees in particular and the broader ecosystem service of pollination
The summaries below demonstrate the breadth of different approaches being taken to
involve wildlife recorders and citizen scientists with work on bees and pollinators The
identification of bees is not straightforward and verifying records can be a time-
consuming task that often places demands on scarce volunteer expertise Alternative
approaches may allow data to be analysed at an lsquoaggregatersquo level looking for overall
trends without having to go to full identification of each species
No doubt each approach will have its own strengths challenges and biases but if good
communications and data-sharing are maintained we should soon have a stronger
framework for generating more and better data on bees which will help identify the best
approaches to conserving pollinators both for their own sake and for the important
services they provide
Bees are not the only insects that pollinate Many other species groups have a role to
play and a number of other recording schemes are involved in work on pollinators
especially the Hoverfly Recording Scheme For reasons of space our feature for NFBR
focuses largely on bees this time round but thatrsquos not to downplay the importance of
other species Read on for some of the recording projects currently in progress
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 5 NFBR
Characters in the key are well illustrated with
drawings and photographs to minimise identification
errors that could result from the misinterpretation of
written descriptions The key has been based on and
uses features adopted from Rognes (1991)
Erzinccedillioglu (1996) Draber-Mońko (2004) and
Whitworth (2006) The photographs have been
produced using professional equipment kindly
provided by Angela Marmont Centre at the Natural
History Museum The aim for the near future is to add
the remaining (non-forensic) species to complete the
Calliphoridae key
The project has been met with great enthusiasm so
far and has been widely supported by the
entomological community I have received a great
amount of help and advice on collecting preparing
and photographing blowflies and on the
practicalities of running a Recording Scheme for
which I am truly grateful For my part I have been
assisting with specimen identification especially
photographic material published via social media
such as Facebook This is an amazing source of data
happily shared by enthusiasts Once identified the fly records are being sent to iRecord
Sometimes it is impossible to provide an accurate identification based on the
photograph keeping specimens is always advised
The other great source of data are museums and collections So far data have been
collected from the Booth Museum (Brighton) and the Natural History Museum in Oxford
The aim for the coming years is to collect of all of the blowfly data from UK museums In
addition I am hoping to encourage a number of
volunteers to set up blowfly sampling stations
across UK The estimated time span for this
survey project is one year (potentially 2017) with
traps being used for few days each month The
traps will be simple self-assembled and cheap
devices using chicken liver as a bait The
samples will be stored in alcohol (to preserve
DNA for future research) identified and records
used to model the spatial and temporal
distribution of blowflies of forensic importance
As some species are only found in specific
geographical locations and environments they
can be used in forensic cases where body
movement is being suspected
In the near future I am planning to set up a
website where various information on blowflies
could be found including tips on identification
keys recording collecting biology and other
related topics In the meantime I am happy to
receive records via iRecord or email
(arumawppl) If you have any questions do
not hesitate to contact me I am looking forward
to hundreds of new records
Lucilia sericata ndash a common greenbottle a species of forensic importance that also causes sheep strike
Pollenia rudis ndash a cluster fly with characteristic wavy golden hairs
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 6 NFBR
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective
by Charlie Outhwaite
The field of ecology is a vast and varied one As a result the types and quantities of data
produced differ hugely Whether a study is small in scale such as a field or lab based
project or a large country or global scale big data study the amount of data that could
be made available is enormous Yet the field of ecology has been considered as behind
in terms of its openness when compared to other areas of biology such as genomics
With such vast amounts and types of data available sharing that data openly has the
potential to boost research opportunities and open up collaboration within and between
fields
As is the case within many scientific disciplines a major barrier for data sharing in
ecology is the fear of being scooped For this reason many researchers would be
unlikely to release their data until they have been able to complete their intended work
first This problem is exacerbated in ecology where data are often collected
independently by one or a few people who gain a sense of ownership over that data
Although permissions of use and attributions can be set up this sense of ownership can
act as a barrier to data sharing If an ecologist has spent months in the field collecting
and then collating that data they are not going to want to share it until they have had
the chance to carry out all their planned analyses and will probably then hold onto it for
a bit longer just in case
Additional problems that are shared with other areas of research include getting credit
for sharing data and actually knowing how to share data The credit issue is starting to
This article first appeared as a blog post on the DNAdigest website dnadigestorgecological-perspective-on-data-sharing
DNAdigest is a not-for-profit organisation that aims to educate facilitate and engage on issues regarding access to genomic data
ldquoFigsharerdquo one of several options now available for sharing research data online
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 7 NFBR
be addressed by data journals where
citations can be gained as a result of
publishing data With citations often
referred to as the ldquocurrencyrdquo of science
bringing data sharing into this
fundamental aspect of academia is key
Although many options are now
available for easy and hassle free data
sharing this knowledge is not
widespread within the ecological
community It is also considered to be
too time consuming to learn these new
techniques Options available to
ecologists include (among others)
figshare (figsharecom) which can be
used to make data publicly available
and citable and GitHub (githubcom)
which allows the sharing of code as well as the more familiar NBN and GBIF routes for
biological records The tools are available now we need to increase the knowledge on
how to use them and encourage their use in day-to-day research life I personally think
these tools should be introduced during undergraduate courses This would ensure that
future generations of researchers have the basic skills they need to share data
effectively
So far these issues are applicable to most areas of science and it is clear that efforts are
being made to overcome them However ecological data also have unique issues My
work in particular can highlight one such problem I use species presence data collected
by volunteers to investigate changes in the status of biodiversity over time As these
data come from various organisations and groups the views on who owns the data and
whether or not it should be shared can vary Of more importance is the fact that these
data consist of precise localities indicating exactly where species have been recorded
For a common species this shouldnrsquot be a problem but what about threatened or
endangered species Should their locations be openly available Some species are
protected by law and the data relating to these species cannot be used in a study which
could result in the data being accessed by others So what would the protocol be in this
case should the dataset be openly shared which could lead to people tracking down
endangered species and potentially putting these populations at risk What other
options are available Until specific protocols are put in place which aims to understand
and mitigate the potential problems with specific kinds of data many data holders are
likely to simply keep it to themselves
The potential for data sharing within the field of ecology is great The scale and scope of
work that could be achieved would be vastly increased if a more open and sharing
community was possible However as well as the issues that are more widely shared
within science there are a number of issues specific to ecology that need to be
addressed in order for the open data movement to pick up momentum Once these
problems are understood and ways to deal with them are established standardised ways
of sharing should be more accessible and accepted within the community Currently
however I think this lack of data sharing is preventing the generation of new and
exciting research and potentially limiting what we are able to offer from within this field
Charlie Outhwaite is a PhD student based at the Centre for Ecology amp Hydrology Her
work looks into producing biodiversity indicators from biological records exploring
drivers behind the trends and the way species traits affect susceptibility to change
Are there risks from sharing data relating to protected species (Hen Harrier photo by Ingrid Taylar via Flickr Creative Commons)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 8 NFBR
Bees and pollination - building the evidence base
Pollinators and especially bees have really caught the imagination of the public in
recent years with regular articles in the press on the potential decline of both wild bees
and honeybees and what effects this could have on our crops and wild flowers But do
we actually have good evidence to assess how populations are faring for the 270 or so
wild bee species in the UK
Last year the government published its National Pollinator Strategy (Defra 2014) One of
the five priority areas that were identified in the Strategy was developing actions for
ldquoimproving evidence on the status of pollinators and the service they providerdquo This was
broken down further into a series of proposals for investigating the economic value of
pollination the effects of crop protection (eg pesticide use) on pollinators and the
options for improving evidence on the populations of the pollinators themselves
As part of the Strategy Defra awarded a research contract for designing and testing
approaches to monitoring changes in the abundance diversity and distribution of British
pollinators (particularly bees and hoverflies) and pollination services to crops This work
is currently being undertaken by a team that includes scientists from the Centre for
Ecology amp Hydrology Leeds University Reading University and the Open University
expert entomologists (representing BWARS and the Hoverfly Recording Scheme through
the Hymettus consultancy) the Bumblebee Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation
and British Trust for Ornithology
A key element of the project involves looking at how best to build on existing survey
activities to provide robust and reliable data on pollinator population change in addition
to the longer-established recording of species distributions The final output of the
project (ending December 2015) will be to set out a costed framework for monitoring
changes in pollinators and pollination services across Britain into the future with both
professionally-led and volunteer-led components
Many people and organisations have an interest in bees and other pollinators and below
we have compiled information from a range of current activities involving the recording
of bees in one form or another Some of the projects are well-established others are
new but all are gathering information that may help us to understand what is happening
to bees in particular and the broader ecosystem service of pollination
The summaries below demonstrate the breadth of different approaches being taken to
involve wildlife recorders and citizen scientists with work on bees and pollinators The
identification of bees is not straightforward and verifying records can be a time-
consuming task that often places demands on scarce volunteer expertise Alternative
approaches may allow data to be analysed at an lsquoaggregatersquo level looking for overall
trends without having to go to full identification of each species
No doubt each approach will have its own strengths challenges and biases but if good
communications and data-sharing are maintained we should soon have a stronger
framework for generating more and better data on bees which will help identify the best
approaches to conserving pollinators both for their own sake and for the important
services they provide
Bees are not the only insects that pollinate Many other species groups have a role to
play and a number of other recording schemes are involved in work on pollinators
especially the Hoverfly Recording Scheme For reasons of space our feature for NFBR
focuses largely on bees this time round but thatrsquos not to downplay the importance of
other species Read on for some of the recording projects currently in progress
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 6 NFBR
Data sharing from an ecological research perspective
by Charlie Outhwaite
The field of ecology is a vast and varied one As a result the types and quantities of data
produced differ hugely Whether a study is small in scale such as a field or lab based
project or a large country or global scale big data study the amount of data that could
be made available is enormous Yet the field of ecology has been considered as behind
in terms of its openness when compared to other areas of biology such as genomics
With such vast amounts and types of data available sharing that data openly has the
potential to boost research opportunities and open up collaboration within and between
fields
As is the case within many scientific disciplines a major barrier for data sharing in
ecology is the fear of being scooped For this reason many researchers would be
unlikely to release their data until they have been able to complete their intended work
first This problem is exacerbated in ecology where data are often collected
independently by one or a few people who gain a sense of ownership over that data
Although permissions of use and attributions can be set up this sense of ownership can
act as a barrier to data sharing If an ecologist has spent months in the field collecting
and then collating that data they are not going to want to share it until they have had
the chance to carry out all their planned analyses and will probably then hold onto it for
a bit longer just in case
Additional problems that are shared with other areas of research include getting credit
for sharing data and actually knowing how to share data The credit issue is starting to
This article first appeared as a blog post on the DNAdigest website dnadigestorgecological-perspective-on-data-sharing
DNAdigest is a not-for-profit organisation that aims to educate facilitate and engage on issues regarding access to genomic data
ldquoFigsharerdquo one of several options now available for sharing research data online
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 7 NFBR
be addressed by data journals where
citations can be gained as a result of
publishing data With citations often
referred to as the ldquocurrencyrdquo of science
bringing data sharing into this
fundamental aspect of academia is key
Although many options are now
available for easy and hassle free data
sharing this knowledge is not
widespread within the ecological
community It is also considered to be
too time consuming to learn these new
techniques Options available to
ecologists include (among others)
figshare (figsharecom) which can be
used to make data publicly available
and citable and GitHub (githubcom)
which allows the sharing of code as well as the more familiar NBN and GBIF routes for
biological records The tools are available now we need to increase the knowledge on
how to use them and encourage their use in day-to-day research life I personally think
these tools should be introduced during undergraduate courses This would ensure that
future generations of researchers have the basic skills they need to share data
effectively
So far these issues are applicable to most areas of science and it is clear that efforts are
being made to overcome them However ecological data also have unique issues My
work in particular can highlight one such problem I use species presence data collected
by volunteers to investigate changes in the status of biodiversity over time As these
data come from various organisations and groups the views on who owns the data and
whether or not it should be shared can vary Of more importance is the fact that these
data consist of precise localities indicating exactly where species have been recorded
For a common species this shouldnrsquot be a problem but what about threatened or
endangered species Should their locations be openly available Some species are
protected by law and the data relating to these species cannot be used in a study which
could result in the data being accessed by others So what would the protocol be in this
case should the dataset be openly shared which could lead to people tracking down
endangered species and potentially putting these populations at risk What other
options are available Until specific protocols are put in place which aims to understand
and mitigate the potential problems with specific kinds of data many data holders are
likely to simply keep it to themselves
The potential for data sharing within the field of ecology is great The scale and scope of
work that could be achieved would be vastly increased if a more open and sharing
community was possible However as well as the issues that are more widely shared
within science there are a number of issues specific to ecology that need to be
addressed in order for the open data movement to pick up momentum Once these
problems are understood and ways to deal with them are established standardised ways
of sharing should be more accessible and accepted within the community Currently
however I think this lack of data sharing is preventing the generation of new and
exciting research and potentially limiting what we are able to offer from within this field
Charlie Outhwaite is a PhD student based at the Centre for Ecology amp Hydrology Her
work looks into producing biodiversity indicators from biological records exploring
drivers behind the trends and the way species traits affect susceptibility to change
Are there risks from sharing data relating to protected species (Hen Harrier photo by Ingrid Taylar via Flickr Creative Commons)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 8 NFBR
Bees and pollination - building the evidence base
Pollinators and especially bees have really caught the imagination of the public in
recent years with regular articles in the press on the potential decline of both wild bees
and honeybees and what effects this could have on our crops and wild flowers But do
we actually have good evidence to assess how populations are faring for the 270 or so
wild bee species in the UK
Last year the government published its National Pollinator Strategy (Defra 2014) One of
the five priority areas that were identified in the Strategy was developing actions for
ldquoimproving evidence on the status of pollinators and the service they providerdquo This was
broken down further into a series of proposals for investigating the economic value of
pollination the effects of crop protection (eg pesticide use) on pollinators and the
options for improving evidence on the populations of the pollinators themselves
As part of the Strategy Defra awarded a research contract for designing and testing
approaches to monitoring changes in the abundance diversity and distribution of British
pollinators (particularly bees and hoverflies) and pollination services to crops This work
is currently being undertaken by a team that includes scientists from the Centre for
Ecology amp Hydrology Leeds University Reading University and the Open University
expert entomologists (representing BWARS and the Hoverfly Recording Scheme through
the Hymettus consultancy) the Bumblebee Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation
and British Trust for Ornithology
A key element of the project involves looking at how best to build on existing survey
activities to provide robust and reliable data on pollinator population change in addition
to the longer-established recording of species distributions The final output of the
project (ending December 2015) will be to set out a costed framework for monitoring
changes in pollinators and pollination services across Britain into the future with both
professionally-led and volunteer-led components
Many people and organisations have an interest in bees and other pollinators and below
we have compiled information from a range of current activities involving the recording
of bees in one form or another Some of the projects are well-established others are
new but all are gathering information that may help us to understand what is happening
to bees in particular and the broader ecosystem service of pollination
The summaries below demonstrate the breadth of different approaches being taken to
involve wildlife recorders and citizen scientists with work on bees and pollinators The
identification of bees is not straightforward and verifying records can be a time-
consuming task that often places demands on scarce volunteer expertise Alternative
approaches may allow data to be analysed at an lsquoaggregatersquo level looking for overall
trends without having to go to full identification of each species
No doubt each approach will have its own strengths challenges and biases but if good
communications and data-sharing are maintained we should soon have a stronger
framework for generating more and better data on bees which will help identify the best
approaches to conserving pollinators both for their own sake and for the important
services they provide
Bees are not the only insects that pollinate Many other species groups have a role to
play and a number of other recording schemes are involved in work on pollinators
especially the Hoverfly Recording Scheme For reasons of space our feature for NFBR
focuses largely on bees this time round but thatrsquos not to downplay the importance of
other species Read on for some of the recording projects currently in progress
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 7 NFBR
be addressed by data journals where
citations can be gained as a result of
publishing data With citations often
referred to as the ldquocurrencyrdquo of science
bringing data sharing into this
fundamental aspect of academia is key
Although many options are now
available for easy and hassle free data
sharing this knowledge is not
widespread within the ecological
community It is also considered to be
too time consuming to learn these new
techniques Options available to
ecologists include (among others)
figshare (figsharecom) which can be
used to make data publicly available
and citable and GitHub (githubcom)
which allows the sharing of code as well as the more familiar NBN and GBIF routes for
biological records The tools are available now we need to increase the knowledge on
how to use them and encourage their use in day-to-day research life I personally think
these tools should be introduced during undergraduate courses This would ensure that
future generations of researchers have the basic skills they need to share data
effectively
So far these issues are applicable to most areas of science and it is clear that efforts are
being made to overcome them However ecological data also have unique issues My
work in particular can highlight one such problem I use species presence data collected
by volunteers to investigate changes in the status of biodiversity over time As these
data come from various organisations and groups the views on who owns the data and
whether or not it should be shared can vary Of more importance is the fact that these
data consist of precise localities indicating exactly where species have been recorded
For a common species this shouldnrsquot be a problem but what about threatened or
endangered species Should their locations be openly available Some species are
protected by law and the data relating to these species cannot be used in a study which
could result in the data being accessed by others So what would the protocol be in this
case should the dataset be openly shared which could lead to people tracking down
endangered species and potentially putting these populations at risk What other
options are available Until specific protocols are put in place which aims to understand
and mitigate the potential problems with specific kinds of data many data holders are
likely to simply keep it to themselves
The potential for data sharing within the field of ecology is great The scale and scope of
work that could be achieved would be vastly increased if a more open and sharing
community was possible However as well as the issues that are more widely shared
within science there are a number of issues specific to ecology that need to be
addressed in order for the open data movement to pick up momentum Once these
problems are understood and ways to deal with them are established standardised ways
of sharing should be more accessible and accepted within the community Currently
however I think this lack of data sharing is preventing the generation of new and
exciting research and potentially limiting what we are able to offer from within this field
Charlie Outhwaite is a PhD student based at the Centre for Ecology amp Hydrology Her
work looks into producing biodiversity indicators from biological records exploring
drivers behind the trends and the way species traits affect susceptibility to change
Are there risks from sharing data relating to protected species (Hen Harrier photo by Ingrid Taylar via Flickr Creative Commons)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 8 NFBR
Bees and pollination - building the evidence base
Pollinators and especially bees have really caught the imagination of the public in
recent years with regular articles in the press on the potential decline of both wild bees
and honeybees and what effects this could have on our crops and wild flowers But do
we actually have good evidence to assess how populations are faring for the 270 or so
wild bee species in the UK
Last year the government published its National Pollinator Strategy (Defra 2014) One of
the five priority areas that were identified in the Strategy was developing actions for
ldquoimproving evidence on the status of pollinators and the service they providerdquo This was
broken down further into a series of proposals for investigating the economic value of
pollination the effects of crop protection (eg pesticide use) on pollinators and the
options for improving evidence on the populations of the pollinators themselves
As part of the Strategy Defra awarded a research contract for designing and testing
approaches to monitoring changes in the abundance diversity and distribution of British
pollinators (particularly bees and hoverflies) and pollination services to crops This work
is currently being undertaken by a team that includes scientists from the Centre for
Ecology amp Hydrology Leeds University Reading University and the Open University
expert entomologists (representing BWARS and the Hoverfly Recording Scheme through
the Hymettus consultancy) the Bumblebee Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation
and British Trust for Ornithology
A key element of the project involves looking at how best to build on existing survey
activities to provide robust and reliable data on pollinator population change in addition
to the longer-established recording of species distributions The final output of the
project (ending December 2015) will be to set out a costed framework for monitoring
changes in pollinators and pollination services across Britain into the future with both
professionally-led and volunteer-led components
Many people and organisations have an interest in bees and other pollinators and below
we have compiled information from a range of current activities involving the recording
of bees in one form or another Some of the projects are well-established others are
new but all are gathering information that may help us to understand what is happening
to bees in particular and the broader ecosystem service of pollination
The summaries below demonstrate the breadth of different approaches being taken to
involve wildlife recorders and citizen scientists with work on bees and pollinators The
identification of bees is not straightforward and verifying records can be a time-
consuming task that often places demands on scarce volunteer expertise Alternative
approaches may allow data to be analysed at an lsquoaggregatersquo level looking for overall
trends without having to go to full identification of each species
No doubt each approach will have its own strengths challenges and biases but if good
communications and data-sharing are maintained we should soon have a stronger
framework for generating more and better data on bees which will help identify the best
approaches to conserving pollinators both for their own sake and for the important
services they provide
Bees are not the only insects that pollinate Many other species groups have a role to
play and a number of other recording schemes are involved in work on pollinators
especially the Hoverfly Recording Scheme For reasons of space our feature for NFBR
focuses largely on bees this time round but thatrsquos not to downplay the importance of
other species Read on for some of the recording projects currently in progress
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 8 NFBR
Bees and pollination - building the evidence base
Pollinators and especially bees have really caught the imagination of the public in
recent years with regular articles in the press on the potential decline of both wild bees
and honeybees and what effects this could have on our crops and wild flowers But do
we actually have good evidence to assess how populations are faring for the 270 or so
wild bee species in the UK
Last year the government published its National Pollinator Strategy (Defra 2014) One of
the five priority areas that were identified in the Strategy was developing actions for
ldquoimproving evidence on the status of pollinators and the service they providerdquo This was
broken down further into a series of proposals for investigating the economic value of
pollination the effects of crop protection (eg pesticide use) on pollinators and the
options for improving evidence on the populations of the pollinators themselves
As part of the Strategy Defra awarded a research contract for designing and testing
approaches to monitoring changes in the abundance diversity and distribution of British
pollinators (particularly bees and hoverflies) and pollination services to crops This work
is currently being undertaken by a team that includes scientists from the Centre for
Ecology amp Hydrology Leeds University Reading University and the Open University
expert entomologists (representing BWARS and the Hoverfly Recording Scheme through
the Hymettus consultancy) the Bumblebee Conservation Trust Butterfly Conservation
and British Trust for Ornithology
A key element of the project involves looking at how best to build on existing survey
activities to provide robust and reliable data on pollinator population change in addition
to the longer-established recording of species distributions The final output of the
project (ending December 2015) will be to set out a costed framework for monitoring
changes in pollinators and pollination services across Britain into the future with both
professionally-led and volunteer-led components
Many people and organisations have an interest in bees and other pollinators and below
we have compiled information from a range of current activities involving the recording
of bees in one form or another Some of the projects are well-established others are
new but all are gathering information that may help us to understand what is happening
to bees in particular and the broader ecosystem service of pollination
The summaries below demonstrate the breadth of different approaches being taken to
involve wildlife recorders and citizen scientists with work on bees and pollinators The
identification of bees is not straightforward and verifying records can be a time-
consuming task that often places demands on scarce volunteer expertise Alternative
approaches may allow data to be analysed at an lsquoaggregatersquo level looking for overall
trends without having to go to full identification of each species
No doubt each approach will have its own strengths challenges and biases but if good
communications and data-sharing are maintained we should soon have a stronger
framework for generating more and better data on bees which will help identify the best
approaches to conserving pollinators both for their own sake and for the important
services they provide
Bees are not the only insects that pollinate Many other species groups have a role to
play and a number of other recording schemes are involved in work on pollinators
especially the Hoverfly Recording Scheme For reasons of space our feature for NFBR
focuses largely on bees this time round but thatrsquos not to downplay the importance of
other species Read on for some of the recording projects currently in progress
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 9 NFBR
Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society BWARS
by Mike Edwards BWARS
The Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Society (BWARS) exists to
do just that - record the occurrence of bees wasps and ants
(the aculeate Hymenoptera in scientific parlance) It developed
from the old Bees Wasps and Ants Recording Scheme in the early 1990s when it became
apparent that a degree of self-funding would enable a greater development of the group
which up to that point had been entirely reliant on support (very gratefully received)
from the Biological Records Centre
The Society is open to anybody who would like to become involved in the recording of
the aculeate Hymenoptera at whatever level of expertise they have Training to improve
expertise may be obtained both formally through organised workshops and also by
direct contact with individuals within the Society many of whom are only too pleased to
help a newcomer in their area either by taking them on field trips or by supporting
their first identifications
Beginners need to be aware that this is not an lsquoeasyrsquo group to name although there are
a limited number of species which may confidently be named in the field Hence most
recording especially in the early stages needs to be backed up by voucher material
often in the form of a dead specimen For some species a photo is perfectly adequate
provided it shows the necessary features - which takes a level of knowledge or good
luck It takes 2 to 3 years before the tangle of names takes good shape but the feeling
of success when you put a name to an insect whose often complex behaviour has
engrossed your time is massive
Although a good binocular microscope is invaluable it is rather a large outlay for a lsquofirst
interestrsquo A lot can be achieved by careful use of a hand lens Dead specimens are best
mounted on an entomological pin as handling is then so very much easier Members
receive a lsquohandbookrsquo on joining which details much more about progressing further
with the group - although not everyone goes to the lengths described within it
The data collected is
collated and maintained on
the Societyrsquos own server
using its own software
Once received by the
processing team data is
run through a set of
checking routines to pick
up errors in the format and
is lsquoeyed overrsquo to check for
records which require
further verification
Obviously the level at
which this is applied
depends upon the known
proficiency of the person
submitting the data
Records which are
lsquooutliersrsquo from the known
distribution either in
terms of geography or
Bumblebee Bombus hortorum on Woolly Thistle (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 10 NFBR
timing are especially significant and need to be checked Many of these will often
have been noted in the Societyrsquos Newsletter before formal submission of the data
so things are straightforward With others however the recorder has not recognised
the significance of their submission few things spur you on more than achieving
a lsquofirstrsquo
Improving the level of lsquoautomaticrsquo verificationvalidation so as to identify data which
is in need of manual checking is a high priority for the development of the Societyrsquos
database Inevitably a lot of data which falls well inside known parameters will be
passed with little inspection a voluntary Society has not got the man-power to carry
out full checks on every record This is becoming a matter of ever-greater urgency
with the large amount of data being generated through sites such as iRecord and iSpot
Data which is subsequently
(perhaps many years later)
shown to be erroneous is
flagged as such on the main
database and a correction
lsquochildrsquo record created (if
possible) or the record is left
as lsquosuspendedrsquo The old
lsquoparentrsquo data is also kept but
flagged as not-exportable All
new data coming into the
system is checked against the
total data for duplicates
which are removed at that
point This is done for
suspended non-exportable
and corrected records as well
as for accepted ones Record
checking once data is within
the database is carried out by
a small team who have direct
access to the server for this
purpose A full trail of any
changes is kept
In the first instance data is passed to the NBN Gateway once or twice in a year
depending on the volunteer time available This dataset is displayed as a series of 10km
resolution maps on the NBN which are echoed on the BWARS website If anyone wishes
to query a displayed record they should contact the data team at BWARS who will
investigate further Such lsquopost displayrsquo queries are a very useful form of validation and
are encouraged Clearly a lsquocorrected recordrsquo will not be updated displayed on the NBN
BWARS maps until the next data update but it will have a full audit-trail on the master
BWARS database
As might be expected with the current interest in bees there have been many occasions
where researchers have asked for and been granted access to the data and quite a few
well recognised papers have been generated on the basis of it Local and national
government bodies also have asked for access especially Local Record Centres these
being the route through which any developer - or people contesting development - need
to go for access if the data displayed on the NBN is not adequate for their purposes
BWARS does not have any salaried staff and cannot nor does it wish to undertake the
compilation of specific area lists or any interpretation of such lists
Lasioglossum cupromicans one of the smaller solitary bees for which identification may not be straightforward (photo by Martin Harvey)
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 11 NFBR
The Buzz Club ndash monitoring populations of UK pollinators and engaging volunteers in fun science projects
by Dr Rob Fowler Buzz Club coordinator
The Buzz Club ndash in association with the University of Sussex ndash is an exciting new
initiative using the collective power of citizen-science Through volunteer participation
we undertake fun nationwide surveys and experiments designed to help us learn more
about why some pollinator species are disappearing and what we can do best to help
them Anyone is welcome to take part whether at home or at school we want people to
get to know the wildlife right on their doorstep by becoming citizen-scientists No
expertise is required but it helps if yoursquore keen and willing to spend a small amount of
time undertaking our project(s) We already have several projects up and running
The ldquoPollinator Abundance Networkrdquo (PAN)
uses pan traps to measure the presence and
abundance of different groups of pollinators
Coloured water-filled traps provide a
standardised catch of the smaller pollinators
particularly flies beetles wasps and some
solitary bees which are overlooked by most
surveys Volunteers are encouraged to try and
identify what insects they catch then samples
are sent back to the University of Sussex for
expert identification allowing us to measure
how abundant the different groups and
species are across the country
Our ldquoBees lsquon Beansrdquo project tests whether we have sufficient pollinators in urban areas
to adequately pollinate garden plants While insect contribution to crop pollination is
being investigated in farmland the role these same creatures play in our urban
environments shouldnrsquot be overlooked Peas beans courgettes tomatoes apples
strawberries and many other garden favourites rely on insect pollination to some
extent so declines in pollinators could threaten the viability of home-grown food
Volunteers measure whether sufficient pollinators visit broad beans and rat-tailed
radishes comparing yield with plants that are pollinated by hand The number and
weight of the pods and beans radish seeds are collected by our volunteers enabling
us to compare how yields vary across the country and in different landscapes
For our newest project ldquoHoverfly Lagoonsrdquo volunteers
are helping us to discover whether we can effectively
create breeding habitat for certain types of hoverfly in
gardens We are setting up small aquatic ecosystems
filled with organic matter of different types Early results
suggest that these are quickly colonised by hoverflies
Once collected data are verified and analysed by
researchers at the University of Sussex who aim to
publish these findings in scientific journals We intend to
make the verified distribution data available via NBN
For most projects we provide all the equipment required but we ask those who take part
to join as members of the Buzz Club to help fund our work at pound2 per month (all of which
goes towards the cost of the equipment) Members can choose which experiments to
take part in We send everything needed to participate and will keep members updated
on our findings and other research at the University of Sussex For more information
please visit wwwthebuzzclubuk or follow us on Twitter The_Buzz_Club
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 12 NFBR
Great British Bee Count by Sarah Gabriel Friends of the Earth
The Great British Bee Count is an annual nationwide survey that helps to monitor the UK
bee population Its main aim is to use fun tools to get as many people as possible
learning about bees This way we can start building a nationwide network of people
looking out for our under-threat pollinators and monitoring how they are doing
Next year participants will again have the opportunity to participate in the survey and
record their results either via our smart phone app or website There are two main
activities that participants will be asked to do One is to record which types of bees they
see The other is to do a basic two minute timed count to checked abundance levels in
different areas All this data is collected and results are published a few months later
outlining what participants have recorded ndash things from the most frequently seen bees
to which habitats are performing the best for bees (and which could do better)
In 2015 participants were also encouraged to take a photo of the bees they recorded
This was so that records could be verified It is hoped that in 2016 the Great British Bee
Count can partner with the Open Universityrsquos iSpot project so that its rich community
can assist with the verification of records Friends of the Earth is also in talks with the
NBN to make the data available through its Gateway service
Citizen-science has the potential to teach many people about our natural world in a fun
and accessible way We hope that the Great British Bee Count brings this to life and
encourages people to take a stand for our precious garden friends To see the results
from 2015 go to wwwfoecoukpagegreat-british-bee-count-2015-results
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 13 NFBR
PolliNation
by Ruth Staples-Rolfe PolliNation Project Officer
PolliNation is a programme which supports schools in helping to protect the future of
our seriously dwindling bee population The PolliNation project developed by the
school grounds charity Learning through Landscapes is supported by the Heritage
Lottery Fund and will engage 260 schools to help transform their grounds into
pollinator-friendly habitats The initial deadline for schools to apply is 21 September
2015
Data recording will monitor any changes in species diversity and numbers A key driver
is to increase awareness of nature and
particularly insects A network of
young enthusiasts in the 260 schools
will help by spreading knowledge and
creating green stepping stones such
as bug hotels and bee houses to
enable insects to move with ease
between different areas
All schools in the UK will be able to
apply to participate in the programme
which will be delivered by Learning
through Landscapes and will enable
teachers children and volunteers to be
trained to make the necessary changes
to their school grounds to create
habitats They will be supported by
biodiversity and landscape experts
from the charity to develop their
environments by planting insect
pollinator friendly areas using
pollinator friendly plants building bug
hotels and bee houses planting night-blooming flowers to draw in moths constructing
bee-hives as well as promoting changes to maintenance schedules reducing pesticides
and letting areas of the school grounds become wild
The programme will also promote and encourage the development of existing provisions
in schools such as orchards and wild meadow areas green walls and ivy growth to
attract the bees and other insects
Learning through Landscapes will be delivering the PolliNation project along with other
sector partners including The Field Studies Council Buglife Butterfly Conservation and
the OPAL Network For more information see httpwwwltlorgukpollination
indexphp
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Bees pollination and evidence
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 14 NFBR
BeeWalks by Richard Comont Data Monitoring Officer
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
The Bumblebee Conservation Trust was established in 2006 to help save Britainrsquos
bumblebees A first step to conserving is to know which species are where and how
populations are doing which is why the BeeWalk project was born Based largely on the
Pollard walks methodology of the Butterfly Monitoring Scheme (BMS) BeeWalk involves
volunteers walking monthly transects to identify and count the bumblebees that they see
and record the flowers being visited with the ultimate aim of being able to establish
bumblebee species population trends across Britain
Time-wise taking part in the survey generally works out at a couple of hours a month
(travel surveying and data input at wwwbeewalkorguk) and covers eight months of
the year (March-October the bumblebee flight period) We usually suggest a route of
about a mile (it can take
a long while to walk a
mile when therersquos good
numbers of bumblebees
about) and itrsquos always
best to take a net and
pot with you to check
any trickier individuals
Of course not all can
be easily identified in
the field and any yoursquore
not sure of should be
recorded as
lsquoindeterminate beersquo ndash
that way we get an idea
of the total number of
Bombus on the transect
without being
spuriously lsquoaccuratersquo
where the true species
isnrsquot clear Anyone can
take part - wersquore
particularly keen that
experienced bumblebee-identifiers become BeeWalkers but wersquore working to provide
training where itrsquos requested
Data collected are verified by checking against range boundaries habitat phenology
recorder ability etc and are shared annually with the national recording body BWARS
(the Bees Wasps amp Ants Recording Society) and will be included in their uploads to the
NBN We also have data-sharing agreements with several LRCs and county Hymenoptera
recorders and are happy to set up more on request (to
beewalkbumblebeeconservationorg)
Because of the particular way bumblebees forage site-specific indices of abundance (as
are produced for the BMS) are unreliable consequently trends will be analysed across
regions and nationally though we still need a couple of yearsrsquo extra data to be able to
distinguish signals from the noise In the meantime wersquore using the data to help BWARS
map the northwards spread of the Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum and using
occurrence and flower visitation data to guide our conservation work Wersquore also always
open to research collaborations
Richard Comont demonstrating bee identification during a training day for the BeeWalks project (photo by Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 15 NFBR
A new national mammal atlas by Derek Crawley The Mammal Society
In order for conservation agencies to make informed decisions it is
important that they have up-to-date information on species
distributions population size and trends It is becoming more
important to not only record species information but have the ability to
share it It is the latter that can cause the biggest problem to any
involved in national recording schemes
The Mammal Society mission statement ldquoMore for Mammalsrdquo included
an aim to update the national atlas last published in 1979 to ensure that red list
assessments and the common cause for nature strategies are based on current known
distribution
For the last five years we having been working with
record holders to share data and get our members and
the public to send in records of mammals from across
the UK We intend to publish the atlas in the autumn of
2016 with the last records being accepted on the 31
December 2015 So if you have any records you would
like us to use and you have not been contacted by us
please get in touch Atlasthemammalsocietyorg
We have been working closely with the Biological
Records Centre in collating the records so they can
produce the distribution maps and analyse the data
They have been excellent in advising us in the process
and how to gain data agreements and in setting up
verification for IRecord where all our records are being
stored
Most of the work is being done by volunteer effort
although we did have a Lottery grant for a south-east
England project where we produced the SE Atlas (see
httpwwwmammalorgukmawse) and developed the
ldquomammal trackerrdquo app which made recording species
much easier for the public and existing mammal
recorders These records along with those added via
the Mammal Society Recording web page all get
submitted to IRecord We have established a set of
mammal recorders to verify each countyrsquos records
allowing them access to their own county records
Other people can see the records via the NBN data
sharing agreements
We now have provisional maps to allow our expert
authors to write about each species One interesting
aspect has been that the new maps are not showing the
same distribution as the previous atlas for what we
considered the more common species The question is
whether this is a true reflection of change or is more to
do with differences in recording coverage and this is
one of the questions our analysis will try to answer
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 16 NFBR
NFBR and recording schemes
by Sarah Whild with input from Paula Lightfoot and Martin Harvey
NFBR aims to represent the full range of biological recording activity as far as it can
This of course includes among many others the national recording schemes that do so
much to document species in many different groups across the country We would like
to ensure that NFBR is playing a useful role in representing the views of recording
schemes but in order to do this we need to develop the most appropriate ways of
communicating with the schemes and the people who run them
To this end last April we asked attendees at the
Recordersrsquo Meeting of the Botanical Society of
Britain and Ireland to complete a questionnaire
about how they saw NFBR in relation to their
recording activity Thanks to responses from 53
people we have some interesting results
Just over half had heard of NFBR before they received the questionnaire but only a
very small proportion were currently members
Over two-thirds sent their records to a local environmental records centre as well as
to their recording scheme
About half knew that their records were available on the NBN Gateway just under half
were unaware of whether their records were on the Gateway or not
We asked people to say how keen they were for their records to be used for
conservation research planning and informinginspiring others Most people
responded that they were ldquovery keenrdquo that their records should be used for all four
categories conservation and research scored highest but only by a small margin No-
one responded that they didnrsquot want their data used for any of these four purposes
When asked ldquoDo you think that it would be good for recording schemes and societies
to have a way of feeding in a collective response to government consultations and
other major projectsrdquo a large majority responded ldquoyesrdquo
When asked ldquoDo you think that NFBR could represent the collective views of recording
schemes and societiesrdquo only two-thirds of the group responded but the great
majority of those who did respond thought that NFBR could act in such a
representative way Other views were that recording schemes could be better
represented by other organisations (suggestions were RSPB Wildlife Trusts BRC BSBI
Local natural history societies) or that recording schemes could organise a collective
response among themselves
A range of suggestions were put forward as to how NFBR could communicate better
with recording schemes all of which received large majorities in favour enthuse more
schemes and society members to join NFBR ensure that schemes are represented on
NFBR council set up email groupsmailing lists to consult schemes send out
questionnaires on particular topics
A note of caution when asked if it was realistic to seek consensus from the variety of
different recording schemes 15 answered yes and 13 said no
Finally we asked people to highlight what they saw as the top issues or concerns
relating to biological recording that NFBR ought to address In no particular order the
issues raised included
Ensuring records are valued and validatedverified
Funding for schemes and societies with funding getting to grass-roots recorders
Over-interpretation of data collected
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 17 NFBR
Uneven playing field for funding
More consensus on what to record
Should full datasets be made available to everyone free of charge
Sidelining of proper biological records from decision making
Data flow and integration of records
Consistency of data on NBN
Reduction in funding to LRCs
Less than desirable joined-up thinking between recording schemes results in
fragmentation and less representation particularly at government level
NFBR is grateful to the BSBI members who took the time to respond and we will be
reviewing the results to help develop our liaison with other recording schemes Wersquod be
delighted to hear from anyone involved in running a recording scheme who would like to
help NFBR take this approach forward
Review Pentax Papilio binoculars bu Steve Whitbread
Smartphones ever more capable cameras
GPS and all that Internet interconnectedness
have all done wonders for biological
recording even for the less gadget prone
However I thought Irsquod share some entirely
non-technical views on a piece of kit that
really ought to be high on the Christmas list
of any naturalist (blame the Editor who was
sporting his during the conference field trip)
and for which no batteries need be included
The Papilio II binoculars from Pentax (in 85x
and 65x magnification options) focus to
50cm (to the wrist of my outstretched arm
They are small light fit comfortably even into small hands (and larger pockets) and also
have a tripod mount In the months Irsquove owned mine theyrsquove given me more instant
pleasure from casual natural history wanders than anything else
If you actually want to see small wild things well enough to identify them and better yet
watch their behaviour without disturbance ndash a caterpillar munching a leaf ladybirds
causing consternation amongst ant aphid farmers the joy of spider sex etc ndash and to see
things yoursquove never seen before these are the beersquos knees (yes theyrsquore good for that
too) And theyrsquore great for getting up close and personal with plant structures or (at
least with the 65s) peering at bullfinches in bushes from rather further away too
There are links to a couple of proper reviews below (though neither refrain from use of
lsquoWowrsquo) but these are absolutely my Desert Island Disc luxury item It would be even
better if they were waterproof (for when I eventually drop them in a tropical rock pool)
but otherwise they are absolutely great Theyrsquoll cost rather more than a decent hand lens
but can be found for much less than their pound150pound200 list prices If you want to give a
gift that keeps on giving (to you) then these are highly recommended But donrsquot take my
word for it see the additional reviews here
httpwwwbestbinocularsreviewscomPentax-Papilio-85x21-Binoculars-118htm
httpwwwbirdwatchingcomopticspentax_papiliohtml
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 18 NFBR
News updates
National Biodiversity Network
Following the publication of the NBN strategy earlier this year a
number of new developments are moving ahead - these are
exciting times for the NBN Trust and the wider partnership
Crowdsourcing Data Capture Summit this meeting will be held in Manchester on
25 September aimed at kick-starting collaborations to mobilise undigitised data
holdings using crowdsourcing platforms Details and booking at wwwnbnorguk
NewsLatest-newsThe-NBN-Crowdsourcing-Data-Capture-Summit
The annual NBN Conference is on 19ndash20 November over two days and in York rather
than London As usual there is an excellent range of speakers lined up Early-bird
booking is available until 9 October go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news2015-
NBN-Conference-bookings-are-open
The new Atlas of Living Scotland is now live at wwwalsscot This is not only a major
project for biological data-sharing in Scotland it is also being used to test ideas for
the development of a wider atlas-type web portal for the NBN as a whole There are a
number of ways in which you can take part in testing and commenting on the new
site wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsAtlas-of-Living-Scotland-Update-(1)
Awards for biological recording the NBN Secretariat has established a new national
award scheme in partnership with the Biological Records Centre and NFBR These
awards will be made annually to individuals groups of people or organisations that
are making outstanding contributions to biological recording and improving our
understanding of the natural world Nominations for the four categories can be sent
in until 30 September and the awards will be presented at the NBN Conference
wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-Awards-to-celebrate-biological-recording-and-
in
NBN is establishing a UK biological recording scheme database to make it easy to
find out about and contact recording schemes and survey projects throughout the UK
To make sure your project is on the list go to wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-newsUK-
biological-recording-scheme-database-establishe
PhD student Ben Brown is working with NBN to research the motivations of biological
recorders To find out more and take part see wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
NBN-recorder-motivation-internship
And in case you missed it last May there is a splendid article by Teresa Frost of
Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre on the value of local environmental records centres
sharing data with wildlife recorders via NBN at wwwnbnorgukNewsLatest-news
The-Value-of-Local-Environmental-Records-Centre-da
News snippets
LiDAR data collected by the EA is now freely available under the Open Government
License at 05m 1m and 2m resolution and can be downloaded from
environmentdatagovukdssurvey Very useful for habitat mapping species
distribution modelling and all kinds of spatial ecology fun
Roger Morris eminent entomologist and ecologist and one of the organisers for the
Hoverfly Recording Scheme has produced a number of thought-provoking posts on
his blog recently including ldquoIs biological recording a modern phenomenonrdquo ldquoA
rationale for caution in photographic identificationrdquo and ldquoIs the biological recording
community ageingrdquo These can be seen at stamfordsyrpherblogspotcouk
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 19 NFBR
Over a million photos of wildlife have been added to
the iSpot website since its launch in 2009 And iRecord
is now displaying over a million wildlife records (with
another million being managed via the data warehouse
that sits behind the iRecord website) Thatrsquos a lot of
enthusiasm for biological recording
Species identification day courses via Manchester
Metropolitan University held at The Gateway centre in
Shrewsbury ndash several still to come this year
wwwsstemmuacukrecording
Know your plants BSBIrsquos Training and Education
Committee have produced a simple booklet with
details of how to start learning plant identification
The PDF is available to download from
wwwbsbiorguktraininghtml or if you would like
hard copies to hand out to studentslearners email
Sarah Whild SWhildmmuacuk
ldquoIntroduction to biological recordingrdquo courses
Interested in becoming more involved in biological recording
but not sure where to start The FSCrsquos Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity
Project is running several new lsquoIntroduction to Biological
Recordingrsquo courses at FSC Preston Montford in Shropshire over
the next year The first to be held over the weekend of 5th and
6th December 2015 is already fully booked but another will
run early in 2016 ndash dates will be announced The aim is to help attendees navigate the
sometimes confusing world of UK biological recording and emerge ready to start
contributing valuable biological records
Topics include
Making biological records
Understanding recording organisations and the recording community
Choosing and using identification resources
Submitting biological records
Options for accredited training in biological recording
The second day features a mini Bioblitz taking attendees through the entire process of
making biological records from sampling and identifying specimens to submitting
records The weekend also includes an introduction to the accredited training
programmes on biological recording run by Manchester Metropolitan University in
conjunction with the FSC and a QampA session with those actively involved in biological
recording
The course is excellent value for money and is subsidised by the FSC Tomorrowrsquos
Biodiversity Project Students may also be eligible for a separate travel bursary of up to
pound40
The course will be lead by the Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity team Charlie Bell and Rich
Burkmar For information on upcoming Biological recording course dates and the full
range of other Tomorrowrsquos Biodiversity training courses please see
wwwtombioukcourses
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 20 NFBR
News from ALERC compiled by Tom Hunt
ALERC has been busy since its last
conference consolidating the
organisationrsquos fundamentals and
looking to secure its future
Through consultation with its
members ALERC has decided to
formally refer to records centres
as Local Environmental Records
Centres (LERCs) rather than just
Local Records Centres (LRCs)
Although this appears a minor
change it is more descriptive
which is especially important for
people new to LERCs It also
makes the association consistent
with its members ie ALERC and
LERCs
As part of this defining process members were also consulted on a new official
definition for LERCs This was agreed as ldquoLocal Environmental Records Centres (LERCs)
are not-for-profit organisations that collect collate and manage information on the
natural environment for a defined geographic area LERCs support and collaborate with a
network of experts to ensure information is robust and make information products and
services accessible to a range of audiences including decision-makers the public and
researchersrdquo
Further to defining LERCs themselves ALERC has been documenting plans for its future
direction in a new five year strategic plan This document will not be published later in
the year but aims address the four key areas of resources members audience and
development A key element will be continued support for the National Coordinator by
raising a greater amount of money from the membership It is hoped that showing a
greater level of commitment to the post by the members will make investment in the
post by funding bodies and partners more attractive One thing that has come in for this
year is the requirement for all ALERC member LERCs to set some kind of time scale for
their accreditation Different LERCs are at different stages regarding their progress
towards accreditation but it is felt that all of them should be able to accredit within five
years The overall effect of this will be to raise confidence in the LERC movement as a
whole More information on ALERC accreditation can be found at http
wwwalercorgukaccreditationhtml
Finally if you havenrsquot already checkout the (relatively) new map on the ALERC website
Here you can now search for a relevant LERC using a post code grid reference or other
location name The map can be found at httpwwwalercorgukfind-an-lerc-maphtml
News from LERCs
Bristol Region ndash BRERC As many of you will know Bristol is European Green Capital for 2015 As part of this
initiative Bristol Regional Environmental Records Centre is organising one of the more
unusual wildlife surveys How Green is My Alley invites people to survey local alleys
According to BRERC ldquoalleys provide a habitat for a surprising variety of wildlife often in
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 21 NFBR
areas where wildlife habitats are rare Interesting plants can be
found including species from southern Europe which flourish
in the warm sheltered environments which many alleys
provide The plants in turn provide food and shelter for birds
and insects Their flowers provide pollen and nectar for
butterflies bees and hoverflies Ferns mosses lichens snails
and spiders can also be found on the walls of a typical alleyrdquo
An information pack together with various recording forms can
be downloaded from the BRERC website wwwbrercorguk
Alternatively contact BRERC and they will send you a survey
pack All the data gathered will then be incorporated into
BRERC databases
Thames Valley ndash TVERC People in the Thames Valley region
will be interested to learn that Thames Valley Environmental
Records Centre have successfully completed several Natural
England supported training courses this summer that have
provided attendees with an introduction to ecology and
survey techniques There will be more courses next year
although if this year is anything to go by they will be
booked up very quickly Look out for more information on
wwwtvercorguk or follow them on Twitter TVERC1
There is more information on this story and many more in
the latest edition of the TVERC newsletter which can be
found here httpwwwtvercorgcmssitestvercfiles
Newsletter20Summer20201520Final20High
20Resolution_0pdf
BRISC 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK
Saturday 31 October ndash Sunday 1 November
Mind the Data Gaps - Are Regional Data Hubs the Way Forward
Taking place at The Grant Arms Hotel Grantown on Spey
Provisional programme Saturday
Out in the field in the morning for those who arrive earlier
1200 hrs Soup and Sandwich lunch
1300 hrs AGM
1330 hrs Conference
Dinner
Sunday
Breakfast for those who stayed overnight
Day out in the field (packed lunch or local eatery before leaving without
return to the hotel)
Costs
Residential Conference Delegates pound8050 pp Includes all meals refreshments and
accommodation for Sat amp Sunday (packed lunch extra) No single supplement
Day Delegate pound1500 pp Includes Soup amp Sandwich Lunch refreshments and
Conference Three course evening dinner is an extra pound25
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 22 NFBR
Recording and research
Biological recording contributes to wider research outcomes and ultimately to better
understanding of ecology and conservation Here are some recent research papers that draw on
data from recording schemes or are relevant to biological recording in general
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society ndash Special Issue Fifty years
of the Biological Records Centre Volume 115 Issue 3 Pages 469ndash
784 onlinelibrarywileycomdoi101111bij2015115issue-3
issuetoc
This anniversary celebration issue includes a wide range of papers that
will be of interest to anyone involved in biological recording There
isnrsquot space to list all the contents but herersquos a flavour of what is
covered
Taking the oldest insect recording scheme into the 21st Century (by Garth Foster)
Ecological monitoring with citizen science the design and implementation of schemes
for recording plants in Britain and Ireland (Oli Pescott et al)
Bias and information in biological records (Nick Isaac and Michael Pocock)
Beyond maps a review of the applications of biological records (Gary Powney and
Nick Isaac)
Gains and losses extinctions and colonisations in Britain since 1900 (Mark Gurney)
Recent trends in UK insects that inhabit early successional stages of ecosystems
(Jeremy Thomas et al)
An agenda for the future of biological recording for ecological monitoring and citizen
science (Bill Sutherland et al)
Plus new technologies environmental DNA monitoring and much more besides All the
papers are currently available as open-access downloads via the above weblink although
I believe that the open-access option is time-limited so get your copies now
Big science from small insects
mediumcomBBSRCbig-science-from-
small-insects-d3d05a69c94c
Not a research paper but a good summary of
some of the many research areas that have
benefited from the long-term monitoring of
insects over 50 years via the Rothamsted
Insect Survey This has produced huge
advances in knowledge for agriculture
conservation and ecological research in
general ldquoThe Rothamsted Insect Survey has
amassed an incredible wealth of data and is
now widely regarded as the most
comprehensive and continual database in the world on terrestrial invertebratesrdquo (Dr
Richard Harrington former RIS Project Leader)
Bellamy C and Altringham J 2015 Predicting Species Distributions Using Record
Centre Data Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts PLoS ONE
10(6) e0128440 doi101371journalpone0128440
Conservation increasingly operates at the landscape scale For this to be effective we
need landscape scale information on species distributions and the environmental factors
A Rothamsted moth trap in action (Martin Harvey)
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 23 NFBR
that underpin them Species records are becoming
increasingly available via data centres and online portals
but they are often patchy and biased We demonstrate
how such data can yield useful habitat suitability models
using bat roost records as an example
Georeferenced bat roost records from across Cumbria
were supplied by the Cumbria Biodiversity Data Centre
3891 records made between 1980 and 2009 were
provided including roost observations of eight species
The records were provided by naturalists local bat groups
and other organisations and a small number of records
were added from incidental fieldwork by the authors
Multi-scale models combining variables measured at their
best performing spatial scales were used to predict
roosting habitat suitability yielding models with useful
predictive abilities Small areas of deciduous woodland
consistently increased roosting habitat suitability but
other habitat associations varied between species and
scales Pipistrellus were positively related to built
environments at small scales and depended on large-scale woodland availability The
other more specialist species were highly sensitive to human-altered landscapes
avoiding even small rural towns The strength of many relationships at large scales
suggests that bats are sensitive to habitat modifications far from the roost itself
Identification Trainers for the Future ndash 6 months on
by Steph West Project Manager Identification Trainers for the Future
You might remember a few months ago we were advertising for trainees for our
Identification Trainers for the Future project Well our first 5 trainees have now been
with us for 6 months so we thought it would be a good time to update you on their
progress
The Identification Trainers for the Future project is being run by the Natural History
Museum in partnership with the Field Studies Council and National Biodiversity Network
Trust and is funded by the Heritage Lottery Funds Skills for the Future programme It is
looking at ways of bridging the skills gap in UK biological recording where we are seeing
a loss of taxonomic skills particularly in early career ecologists and for those species
groups often considered lsquodifficultrsquo As part of the project over 3 years we will be taking
in 15 trainees on 12-month long work-
based placements where they will
develop their identification skills for a
range of critical taxa as well as learning
communication and teaching skills so
they can pass their knowledge on to
others
Our first 5 trainees started in March this
year In the last 6 months Anthony
Roach Chloe Rose Katy Potts Mike
Waller amp Sally Hyslop have undertaken a
Map of the speciesrsquo roost records used from the Lake District National Park
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog
Newsletter 50 ndash September 2015 ndash page 24 NFBR
wide range of identification training courses
helped us with our citizen science projects such
as Orchid Observers and Microverse delivered
training as part of our Decoding Nature project
run stands at events including Big Nature Day
and the Tring BioBlitz as well as building their
own collections and working on their own
specialist areas They have also completed
placements at FSC centres across the country
and had training in biological recording direct
from the NBN and in using iSpot and iRecord
from the NFBRrsquos Martin Harvey
The identification training has of course been a real highlight with a wide range of
species groups covered at this stage including coleoptera diptera hymenoptera
flowering plants bryophytes and lichens We have also been able to offer additional
places on some of these workshops with individuals from a variety of organisations
attending and hope to make more places available next year In order to re-enforce all
this training we have not just been sat in the Angela Marmont Centre looking at
specimens from the NHMs collections but heading out into the field to learn field ID
collection and preservation techniques Some of this was done during the workshops
themselves but we also ran a 3 day study tour down to the Dorset coast to focus on
various elements of field work
As you can see the trainees have certainly been busy over the last 6 months As I type
this though the trainees are now starting their first day of Phase three of their
traineeship where they spend 3 months working solidly with a single curation team
developing their specialist interest Katy will be joining the Coleoptera section Mike will
be working on Lichens Sally will be staying
with us in the AMC to work on the UK
herbarium Anthony will be recurating the
British Odonata collection and Chloe will be
working with Hymenoptera They certainly
have an intensive few months ahead of them
and a fantastic opportunity to develop their
skills and work with some of the top
specialists in the country
This gives me time therefore to work on
recruiting our next trainees Yes we are
already looking for our next group of
enthusiastic early career ecologists
taxonomists and scientific communicators to
join us from March 2016
Applications for the next round of Identification Trainers traineeships at the Natural History Museum are open from 14 September to 12 October 2015 It may be possible to book a place on a taster session to find out more about the traineeships For more information on the taster sessions or to download application forms see the webpage at wwwnhmacukidtrainers
More detail on how the traineeship programme over the last year can be found on the blog at blognhmacuktagid-trainers-for-the-future-blog