nicee nepal eq 2015 short presentation

26
Team members: Durgesh C. Rai, Vaibhav Singhal, S Lalit Sagar, Bhushan Raj S Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur 2015 GORKHA (NEPAL) EARTHQUAKE Effects on Built Environment & A Perspective on Growing Seismic Risk in Bihar-Nepal Region National Information Center on Earthquake Engineering

Upload: js-kalyana-rama

Post on 12-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

Team members:

Durgesh C. Rai, Vaibhav Singhal, S Lalit Sagar, Bhushan Raj S

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

2015 GORKHA (NEPAL) EARTHQUAKEEffects on Built Environment &

A Perspective on Growing Seismic Risk in Bihar-Nepal Region

National Information Center on Earthquake Engineering

Page 2: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

2NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 2

The M7.8 earthquake struck Nepal on 25th April 2015 at 11:41 am IST with its epicenter located in Gorkha district (28.15N 84.7E) in the central Nepal, about 80 km NW of the capital Kathmandu. It was a shallow focus event (depth 15 km), which was felt in India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and China.

Two major aftershocks of M6.6 and M6.7 were also felt within the next two days of the earthquake.

80 81 82 83 84 85 86 8729

28

27

26

25

24

NEPAL

Kathmandu

Birgunj

Motihari Sitamarhi

MuzaffarpurPatna

Gaya

VaranasiAllahabad

Kanpur

Lucknow Gorakhpur

BIHAR

M7.8

UTTAR PRADESH

JHARKHANDMADHYAPRADESH

2015 Gorkha (Nepal) Earthquake

Page 3: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

3NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 3

The team visited several affected cities and towns of Central Nepal and North Bihar such as Kathmandu, Bhaktapur, Lalitpur, Motihari and Sitamarhi.

The maximum observed shaking intensity during this earthquake was IX in MSK scale.

About 8020 deaths were reported of which 7913 were from Nepal, 78 from India, 25 in China and 4 from Bangladesh. Also, about 18950 people were reported to be injured.

2015 Gorkha (Nepal) Earthquake…80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87

29

28

27

26

25

24

NEPALKathmandu (IX)

Birgunj (VI)

Motihari (VI)Sitamarhi (VI)

Muzaffarpur

Patna (V)

Gaya

Allahabad

Kanpur

Lucknow Gorakhpur

BIHAR

M7.8

UTTAR PRADESH

JHARKHAND

MADHYAPRADESH

Bhaktapur (VIII)Lalitpur (VIII)

Hetauda (VII)

Raxaul (VI)

Major cities/towns visited

Page 4: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

4NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 4

Geological Hazards

Landslide on road to Kathmandu, Nepal Vertical movement of ground which resulted in severe damages to roads

Page 5: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

5NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 5

Performance of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) Buildings

Complete collapse of 50~60 year old URM buildings in Nikoshera (Bhaktapur, Nepal)

Old unreinforced masonry buildings suffered maximum damage during the earthquake due to their deteriorated strength over the years and the absence of concrete members aggravated the level of damage. However, the adjacent RC buildings suffered only minor damage.

RC buildings performed better

than masonry

Page 6: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

6NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 6

Out-of-plane failure of the wall and step-type diagonal cracks

The old masonry buildings suffered partial to complete collapse due to the inadequate lateral strength of the masonry walls and the poor connection between the wall and diaphragm.

Performance of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) Buildings…

Severe damage to the walls due to the absence of lintel band around openings

Page 7: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

7NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 7

Performance of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) Buildings…

Cracks were formed at the corners of the masonry wall making it vulnerable to collapse under out-of-plane shaking

In most of the URM buildings, the structure lost integrity after formation of cracks at the corners of the wall making it highly vulnerable to out-of-plane collapse

Page 8: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

8NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 8NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015

Masonry house in Madhubani, Bihar (Photo: PTI)

School building in Motihari, Bihar (Photo: PTI)

Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in India

Some areas of North Bihar experienced a shaking intensity of VI and below. 3 poorly built kaccha houses were completely collapsed and 142 buildings were partially damaged.

Page 9: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

9NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 9

Performance of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Buildings

Pancake collapse of four storey building in Kathmandu, Nepal

Collapse of buildings highlighted the structural deficiencies in the RC buildings of the affected region. This includes poor reinforcement detailing, faulty construction practices, poor quality of construction materials and so on.

Page 10: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

10NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 10

Performance of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Buildings…

Open ground storey failure of 5 storey building in Kathmandu, Nepal

Some RC buildings the ground storey is left open without infill walls for utility purposes such as parking. This practice makes the ground storey weak with respect to the upper storeys leading to a mechanism known as the weak storey collapse.

3m Lateral movement

Page 11: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

11NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 11

Performance of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Buildings…

Collapse of intermediate weak storey in buildings of Kathmandu, Nepal

A number of buildings collapsed during the earthquake due to faulty construction practices such as absence of adequate walls led to formation of weak storey mechanism.

Page 12: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

12NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 12

Performance of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Buildings…

Collapsed buildings having poor geometric configuration (Too long in one direction)

Page 13: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

13NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 13

Performance of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Buildings…

Diagonal cracks in the wall due to lack of confining RC band around openings

Half-brick thick infill walls severely damaged in a building in Kathmandu

The RC buildings that were partially destructed had inadequate reinforcement and masonry walls were projecting beyond the columns.

Page 14: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

14NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 14

Performance of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Buildings…

No RC band around opening No columns at the corners of building plan

Page 15: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

15NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 15

Performance of Tall RC Buildings

Diagonal cracks in the infill walls of high-rise buildings

Combined in-plane and out-of-plane failure of infill wall

16 storey apartment building in Patan

Infill walls were severely damaged in tall RC buildings

Page 16: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

16NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 16

Poor construction practices in RC Buildings

Poor geometric configuration (Too long in one direction)

Page 17: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

17NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 17

Box type construction: Extension of wall beyond column line

Poor construction practices in RC Buildings…

Due to the extension of masonry wall beyond column line, the columns supporting the projection will be overstressed and the outer wall will also susceptible to damage due to lesser stiffness.

Page 18: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

18NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015

Free Standing Structures

18

Damage to most of the freestanding structures in and around Kathmandu and some parts of North Bihar was observed

Page 19: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

19NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015

Heritage Structures

19

Most of the temples were built in pagoda style, having timber frames and brick masonry walls. The walls were of random rubble masonry core and dressed with brick masonry.

The roofs were supported by timber struts and the connection between the wall and the frame was made using timber hooks.

Page 20: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

20NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 20

Performance of Heritage Structures

Dharahara Tower

Before

After

Image: Corbis Ian Trower

Page 21: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

21NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 21

Performance of Heritage Structures…

Durbar Square in Sundhara

Image: Andrej Pauš

Before

After

Page 22: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

22NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015 22

Performance of Heritage Structures…

Temples in Bhaktapur Durbar Square

Page 23: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

23NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015

Performance of Heritage Structures…

23

Sway of timber frame and masonry collapse of Temple in Lalitpur

Page 24: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

24NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015

Performance of Heritage Structures…

24

Failure of Pagoda Structures

Page 25: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

25NICEE at IIT Kanpur/ 12 May 2015

Summary of Earthquake Effects The M7.8 event lead to a widespread devastation with significant number of

fatalities and huge loss to property. Significant damage was observed in the 50~60 year old unreinforced masonry

buildings because of inadequate lateral strength. Well constructed reinforced concrete (RC) buildings performed in a relatively

better way with minor damages. However, dramatic collapse of some RC structures can be attributed to open ground storey, poor geometric configuration of buildings, poor reinforcement detailing in structural members, etc.

The damage to the RC buildings was aggravated due to the construction of buildings on filled-up lands, use of half-brick thick infill walls and extension of walls beyond column line.

The cultural heritage structures, being old and weak were unable to resist the seismic forces and were damaged seriously.

Landslides were observed, and vertical movement of soil lead to damage of roads and pedestrian bridges at some places.

Page 26: NICEE Nepal EQ 2015 Short Presentation

The damage to built environment, economic loss and human casualties caused by Himalayan earthquakes are increasing rather proportionally with the growth of settlement and population.

Despite the available knowledge base, the communities in high seismic regions such as Nepal and neighbouring Indian states are not adequately prepared due to lack of implementation of earthquake-resistant building technology. However, with adherence to seismic codes and recommended construction practices, it is possible to mitigate such large-scale disasters.

NICEE @ IITK has several resources available at its website www.nicee.orgfor seismic risk mitigation of built-environment.

Closing Remarks