nicole shanahan 2016 meet codex
TRANSCRIPT
Lawyering in the AI Age
My goal is to answer these 3 questions:
1. From a law practice standpoint, why should we care about legal AI?
2. How does one build AI, generally?
3. Where to find Legal AI?
1937 Ronald Coase: transaction costs are a central determinant of how economic activity is organized.
1997 Ronald Gilson: Imperfect markets give rise to intermediaries to lift the wedge between parties. “Lawyers are transaction cost engineers.”
2015 Nicole Shanahan (at Stanford CodeX): Technology supplements lawyers as transaction cost engineers. Technology is the ultimate transaction cost economizer.
Origins: I wanted to understand what my job as a lawyer was
What the article actually says is this:
When we shift focus from thinking about legal technology in terms of a lawyer’s
efficiency, to viewing these advancements within the context of socioeconomic
organization, we can begin to realize its true significance.
Borrowing from transaction cost theory, there should be 3 core tenets of legal technology:
1. Optimizing for the exchange of information.
2. Setting consistent expectations between parties.
3. Mitigating risks.
Our job as modern legal technologists is to build software that mimics the cognitive
processes of lawyers. We expect that we can produce faster, cheaper and more accurate
legal work products.
In the context of E-Discovery/Federal Rules, for instance:
Proportionality(b) Discovery Scope and Limits.(1) Scope in General. Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of discovery is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable..
How can the tech community help with theFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 26?
One top of the head proposal….
Create a computational weighting system based on
Judge Laporte’s Proportionality Matrix
In the context of Criminal Justice
“Predictive Policing”
Prosecutor Discretion Tools
In the context of Patents
Practice Management
Valuation Analysis
Licensing Strategy
FOR THE FIRST TIME EVERTHIS IS ALL TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE
SO, WHAT DO YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT LEGAL AI?
General AI
MachineLearning
Logic/Rules Automation
General AI
MachineLearning
Logic/Rules Automation
DATADATA
DATA
DATA
DATA
DATA
DATADATA
DATA
DATA
General AI
MachineLearning
Logic/Rules Automation
Computa-tionalLogic (1) the representation of facts and
regulations as formal logic and
(2) the use of mechanical reasoning techniques to derive consequences of the facts and laws so represented.
Computa-tionalLaw
General AI
MachineLearning
Logic/Rules Automation
Super-vised
Learning
Unsuper-vised
Learning Training Data Hand-Labels “These e-mails
exemplify willful in-fringement”
Clustering “these e-mails have similar expres-sions of willfulness”
Dimensionality Reduction
General AI
MachineLearning
Logic/Rules Automation
Super-vised
Learning
Unsuper-vised
Learning(Deep) Neural Networks
Super-vised
LearningUnsuper-
vised Learning
30 Million Positions from previously played Go matches used as training data
It then began to play itself, creat-ing more data for “reinforcement” learning.
General AI
MachineLearning
Logic/Rules Automation
Painful and Slow
General AI
MachineLearning
Logic/Rules Automation
SUDDEN
IS IT POSSIBLE TO PREDICT THE TRANSITION TO LEGAL AI?
WWCD
What would Coase do?
“Coasean Mapping”
Forms & E-Filing
Client Intake
E-Discovery
Drafting Briefs
Client E-mails
COST
Transaction cost economizing function
COMPLEXITY
“Coasean Mapping”
Forms & E-Filing
Client Intake
E-Discovery
Drafting Briefs
Client E-mails
COST
Transaction cost economizing function
COMPLEXITY
Gen-eral
AI
Legal Singularity?
www.legaltechlist.com
WILL GENERAL AI REPLACE LAWYERS?