nitin mukerji 1, john crossman 1, joanne lewis 2, philip j kane 3 1 department of neurosurgery,...
TRANSCRIPT
‘On-call’ referral patterns of patients with diagnosis of brain tumour: An audit of activity in in
two neurosurgical centres
Nitin Mukerji1, John Crossman1, Joanne Lewis2, Philip J Kane3
1Department of Neurosurgery, Newcastle General Hospital
2Department of Oncology, Freeman Hospital3Department of Neurosurgery, James Cook University Hospital
Background
Patients with a diagnosis of brain tumour commonly referred as ‘on call’ emergencies
Referral taken by the ‘on call’ registrar and discussed with the ‘on call’ consultant
Advice given on management
Implications
EWTD
Advice variable
May not be discussed with a consultant with interest in tumour management
AimsTo audit pattern of referrals into the two
neurosurgical units in NECN
Identify patterns in referral which have potential for modification:improve patient careImprove EWTD compliance
MethodologyDevelopment of ‘on-call’ referrals database at
both units (NM)Completed by on call registrar at end of on-call
periodPatient demographics, reason for referral, advice
given Piloted at JCUH and then introduced to NGH
All referrals in one year period audited (2009)
Results
4751 referrals
451 tumour related9.5% of all on call referrals
Pattern of referrals
Time of day During week
Pattern of tumour referrals
Peak times of tumour referrals
Sources of referrals
Specialties that refer tumours
Source of referrals: time of day
Grade of referring doctors
Referring hospitals-JCUH
Referring hospitals-NGH
Results15% of ‘On-call’ neuro-oncology referrals were
received out of hours
50% of ‘On call’ neuro-oncology referrals were received between 11am and 5 pm.
70% of ‘On call’ neuro-oncology referrals had a GCS 14 or 15
<1% of ‘On call’ neuro-oncology referrals needed emergency surgery
DiscussionImportant baseline data
Monitor impact of transfer of NGH unit to RVI
Scope to develop guidelines to ensure direct referrals to a neuro-oncology
Scope to reduce OOH workload and compliance with EWTD
Further Work
Extend audit to include 2010
Subgroup analysis
Model effects of propsed guidelines