nitrogen doped tio2 nrs
TRANSCRIPT
7/23/2019 Nitrogen Doped TiO2 NRs
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nitrogen-doped-tio2-nrs 1/8
Facile synthesis of nitrogen self-doped rutile TiO2 nanorods{
Shuan Wang, Junmin Xu, Hualin Ding, Shusheng Pan, Yunxia Zhang and Guanghai Li *
Received 25th May 2012, Accepted 26th June 2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2ce25827g
Nitrogen doping is a promising method to enhance the visible light absorption and photo-catalytic
activity of TiO2. A new method is reported for the synthesis of nitrogen self-doped rutile TiO2
nanorods, along with the formation study of V-shaped N-doped TiO2 nanorods, using TiN as a
precursor and using a hydrothermal method. Our synthesis method gives a facile and easy way to
control nitrogen doping in a TiO2 lattice. Two types of the V-shaped nanorods, with a (101) coherent
boundary of either 114.4u or 134.9u inner angle, were observed. The N-doped TiO2 nanorods exhibit
an enhanced visible light absorption and red-shift in band gap in comparison with pure rutile TiO2
nanopowders. The mechanisms of N doping and the formation of the V-shaped nanorods are
analyzed and discussed. The oriented attachment and Ostwald ripening are considered responsible for
the formation and growth of the straight and V-shaped N-doped TiO2 nanorods.
Introduction
Titanium dioxide (TiO2), with a wide band gap of 3.2 eV for
anatase or 3.0 eV for rutile, is an important semiconductor
photocatalyst and has attracted considerable attention. The
ability to control the band gap of TiO2 nanocrystals and to
enhance the utilization rate of the solar spectrum is essential for
applications in fields such as dye-sensitized solar cells1 and photo-
catalysis.2 Many methods have been explored to reduce the band
gap of TiO2, such as doping transition-metal (iron,3 vanadium,4
nickel5 and chromiump6) and non-metal (nitrogen,7 sulfur,8
fluorine,9 and carbon10) into the TiO2 host lattice. Among them,
the nitrogen doping is an effective method to enhance visible light
absorption and photo-catalytic activity.7,11–13
Different methods have been developed to incorporate
nitrogen in TiO2, and those methods can be generally classified
into three categories: (1) sputtering and implantation techniques,
mainly used to prepare single crystalline or polycrystalline
N-doped TiO2 thin films;7,14 (2) high temperature annealing
treatment under a N-containing atmosphere;15 and (3) wet
methods, including sol–gel,16 solvothermal and hydrothermal
methods.17–19 The first two methods need either a high
temperature or complicated and expensive equipment, while
the wet chemical method is simple and effective in controlling
both the nitrogen doping content and TiO2 nanocrystal size,
through changing the experimental parameters, such as reaction
temperature, solution pH value and solvent system.
It is well known that titanium nitride (TiN) is a metallic conductor
with a partially filled band and a chemical bond of simultaneously
metallic, covalent and ionic characters,20 which has a NaCl-like cubic
crystallization in the rock-salt structure, with N atoms occupying
interstitial positions in a close-packed arrangement of Ti atoms.21
The fact that TiO2
can be prepared via a simple oxidation process of
TiN22 promises an opportunity for nitrogen self doping.
TiO2 nanostructures with different morphologies, such as
nanowires,23 nanorods,24 nanotubes,19 and nanoflowers,25 have been
prepared in recent years. The V-shaped nanostructures have been
observed in SnO2,26 RuO2,27 and ZnSe.28 However, there is no report
about the V-shaped N-doped TiO2 nanostructures. The V-shaped
structures are of particular interest because the sudden break down in
lattice periodicity at the junction offers a good lateral confinement,
and thus can enhance the excitonic optical response.29 It is believed
that this complex nanorod derived structure could offer new
opportunities in tailoring the properties of discrete 1D nanostruc-
tures and in 3D organization of nanostructured materials.30
Here, a new method for the synthesis of nitrogen self-dopedrutile TiO2 nanorods is reported, along with the formation study
of V-shaped N-doped TiO2 nanorods, using TiN as a precursor,
and using hydrothermal method. The separation of N from TiN
provided a self doping in the formation process of TiO2
nanorods. An enhanced visible light absorption and red-shift
of the optical band gap were observed.
Experimental
Materials and synthesis
TiN nanopowders, provided by Hefei Kaier Nano Energy
Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Hefei, China, were produced
Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Anhui Key Lab of Nanomaterialsand Nanostructure, Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, P.R. China. E-mail: [email protected];Fax: +86-551-5591437; Tel: +86-551-5591437 { Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [FESEMimages of TiN precursor powders, HRTEM image of the tapered tip inN-doped TiO2 nanorod and the corresponding schematic orientationrelations of the {111} facets on the tapered tip, HRTEM images of N-doped TiO2 nanocrystals at the early stage of hydrothermal treatment,FESEM image and XRD pattern of the product hydrothermally treatedwithout HCl and the determination of the band gap from the plots of (ahn)n vs. hn: with n=1/2 and n=2]. See DOI: 10.1039/c2ce25827g
CrystEngComm Dynamic Article Links
Cite this: CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679
www.rsc.org/crystengcomm PAPER
7672 | CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679 This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
7/23/2019 Nitrogen Doped TiO2 NRs
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nitrogen-doped-tio2-nrs 2/8
by the RF induction thermal plasma process using Titanium
tetrachloride as the precursor. In a typical synthesis process of
N-doped TiO2 nanorods, 62 mg TiN was added into 30 ml of
distilled water with magnetic stirring, then 6.0 ml of HCl (35%)
was added by drops into the above solution with continuous
stirring for 30 min. The final concentration of HCl is 2.0 M. The
solution was finally transferred to a 50 ml Teflon-lined autoclave
and heated at 180 u
C for different times. After cooling down toroom temperature, the precipitate was collected and washed with
distilled water and absolute alcohol several times, and then dried
at 80 uC for 24 h in air.
Characterization
The as-prepared products were characterized by X-ray diffrac-
tion (XRD, X’Pert Pro MPD), X-ray photoelectron spectro-
scopy (XPS, Thermo ESCALAB 250), field emission scanning
electron microscopy (FESEM, Sirion 200) and high resolution
electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM 2010). Raman spectra were
recorded at room temperature using a confocal microprobe
Raman system (Renishaw, inVia) with the excitation wavelength
of 532 nm. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded on a
Shimadzu UV3600 spectrophotometer, equipped with an inte-
grating sphere attachment (Shimadzu ISR-260), using Ba2SO4
powder as an internal reference.
Results and discussion
Fig. 1 shows XRD patterns of the TiN precursor and the as-
prepared product that was hydrothermally treated at 180 uC for
12 h. One can see that all the diffraction peaks of the precursor
can be well indexed to cubic phase TiN (JCPDS card no. 38-
1420), see curve (1) in Fig. 1, while that of the as-prepared
product can be indexed to rutile phase TiO2
(JCPDS card no. 04-
0551) and no other phases or residual TiN can be detected, see
curve (2) in Fig. 1, indicating that all the TiN nanopowders have
been transformed into TiO2 after the hydrothermal treatment.
Fig. 2 shows the typical FESEM images of the as-prepared
product that was hydrothermally treated at 180 uC for 12 h. One
can see that the as-prepared product consists of the rectangle
nanorods with tapered tips and 20–50 nm in diameter and 500–
600 nm in length. It is worth noting that there exist some
branched V-shaped nanorods, as can be clearly seen in the
enlarged FESEM image in Fig. 2b, and the content of V-shaped
nanorods is over 30%. The TiN precursor exhibits an agglom-eration of nanoparticles with an average diameter of about
20 nm. (Fig. S1{)
To identify the element chemical state of the as-prepared
nanorods, XPS analysis was performed, as shown in Fig. 3 for
the nanorods that were hydrothermally treated at 180 uC for
12 h. The survey spectrum in Fig. 3a shows the existence of only
Ti, O, and N, without any impurities. The binding energy at
458.8 eV and 464.6 eV are attributed to the Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2
in rutile phase TiO2, respectively, see Fig. 3b, which matches the
position for Ti4+ in TiO2, and is slightly lower than the pure
TiO2. The decrease in binding energy might be due to the
different electronic interactions between Ti and the doped
nitrogen, as pointed out by Satish et al.31
It was found that inthe TiN film, the binding energy of Ti 2p is at 455.2 eV, 22 which
is not present in Fig. 3b, indicating that no TiN is present in the
product. The O 1s peak shown in Fig. 3c is asymmetric and
broad, showing at least two kinds of oxygen species, including
crystal lattice oxygen and chemisorbed oxygen.32 Gaussian
fitting gives two peaks, one peak is at 530.0 eV assigned to
lattice oxygen in TiO2, and is well consistent with the previous
study,33 and another peak at 531.8 eV is attributed to
chemisorbed oxygen. The binding energy at 400.1 eV in
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of TiN precursor and N-doped TiO2, and that
from JCPDS card no. 38-1420 of TiN and JCPDS card no. 04-0551 of
rutile TiO2.
Fig. 2 (a) Low and (b) high magnification FESEM images of N-doped
TiO2 nanorods.
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679 | 7673
View Article Online
7/23/2019 Nitrogen Doped TiO2 NRs
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nitrogen-doped-tio2-nrs 3/8
Fig. 3d can be assigned to N 1s, which is considered to be related
to the nitrogen doping in TiO2, though there is some debate in
the literature. The binding energy of N 1s generally lies in the
range of 396–404 eV, depending strongly on the preparing
methods and conditions.34 In the thermal oxidation of titanium
nitride, Saha assigned N 1s peaks (at 400 and 402 eV) to
molecularly chemisorbed c-N2.22 This assignment is questionable
as it is widely known that molecular N2 is not chemisorbed on
metal oxides, such as TiO2, at room temperature. In the N–TiO2
powder prepared by an atmospheric plasma procedure and
posterior annealing, Chen attributed N 1s at 395.8–397.8 eV to
Ti–N.35
It was found that the binding energy of nitrogen insubstitution positions of the TiO2 lattice is at 397 eV.7,36 As there
is neither XPS peak at 397 eV nor TiN crystal phase in our
samples, we attribute binding energy at 400.1 eV to the
incorporated interstitial N in the TiO2 lattice, where nitrogen
simultaneously bonds to oxygen and to titanium in a defective
lattice site (i.e., in a kind of Ti–N–O or Ti–O–N local structure).
The quantification of Ti 2p and O 1s peaks gives average Ti:O
atomic ratio of nearly 1 : 2, while that of N 1s gives nitrogen
doping content of about 1.09 at %.
Raman spectroscopy is a very effective characterization
method in distinguishing different phase structures of TiO2 by
their characteristic vibration Raman peaks. Fig. 4 shows the
Raman spectra of N-doped TiO2 nanorods together with that of TiN nanopowders. The Raman bands at 190 and 536 cm21 in
Fig. 4a are the first-order scatterings of nonstoichiometric TiN,
which shows a red shift in comparison with bulk TiN (at 200 and
550 cm21).34 The Raman bands at 148, 249, 441, and 607 cm21
in Fig. 4b are ascribed to the B1g, two-phonon scattering, Eg,
and A1g modes of rutile phase TiO2, respectively.37 The peak
positions of the Eg and A1g modes (at 441 and 607 cm21,
respectively) exhibit a red shift in comparison with pure rutile
TiO2 (at 447 and 612 cm21, respectively), while that of the two-
phonon scattering mode at 249 cm21 shows a blue shift with
respect to pure rutile TiO2 (235 cm21).37 The size of the N-doped
TiO2 nanorods is in the nanometer scale, and the resulting
phonon confinement effect38 might result in the shift. The
interstitial N in TiO2 lattice is considered another reason that
induces the shift due to the nonstoichiometric effect.39 The
corresponding Gaussian fitting gives three more peaks situated
at 336, 543, and 689 cm21(Fig. 4b), and the bands at 336 and
543 cm21 are the first-order scattering, while that at 689 cm21 is
ascribed to the second-order scattering of nonstoichiometric
TiN,34 which are clearly different from that of pure TiN
nanopowders (Fig. 4a). The band at 200 cm21 corresponding
to the first-order scatterings of nonstoichiometric TiN cannot be
clearly observed, which might be due to its overlapping with the
two-phonon scattering of TiO2 at 249 cm21. The fact that the
bands at 336 and 689 cm
21
only exist in the N-doped TiO2nanorods and do not in the pure TiN nanopowders indicates that
the bands at 336, 543, and 689 cm21 come from the N doping,
and there is not any TiN remaining in the N-doped TiO2
nanorods. The appearance of the characteristic vibration bands
of Ti–N indicates that nitrogen substitutes for some oxygen
atoms in the TiO2 lattice, which is consistent with XPS results.
Fig. 5 shows TEM images of the N-doped TiO2 straight
nanorods. The edges of the nanorods are either smooth or have a
zigzag shape (see the arrows in Fig. 5a). The zigzag shape is due
to the inhomogeneous redeposition rate of the dissolved species
on the surfaces of larger crystals in the crystal coarsening
process. From the lattice fringe shown in Fig. 5b, it can be seen
that the crystal planes are perpendicular to the growth directionof the nanorod, and the measured inter-plane spacing (0.33 nm)
matches well with the literature reported value of the (110) plane
in rutile TiO2 (0.326 nm), indicating that the nanorod grows
along the [001] direction. The corresponding SAED pattern
shown in the inset of Fig. 5b can be indexed to the rutile phase
with a tetragonal structure, and the [110] axis is perpendicular to
the nanorod growth direction, which provides further evidence
that the nanorod grows along the [001] direction. The top end of
the nanorod has a four-sided tip with the {111} facets as
determined by measuring the inter-plane spacing and calculating
the angle between the top end facet and the (110) plane. (Fig.
S2{)
Fig. 3 XPS spectra of TiO2 nanorods hydrothermally treated at 180 uC
for 12 h with 2.0 M HCl: (a) the survey spectrum, the high resolution
scan of (b) Ti 2p, (c) O 1s and (d) N 1s.
Fig. 4 Raman spectra of (a) TiN nanopowders and (b) N-doped TiO2
nanorods. B1g, 2-p (two-phonon scattering), Eg and A1g modes come
from rutile phase TiO2.
7674 | CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679 This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
7/23/2019 Nitrogen Doped TiO2 NRs
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nitrogen-doped-tio2-nrs 4/8
Fig. 6 shows TEM images of the V-shaped N-doped TiO2
nanorods with different inner angles. Detailed analysis revealed
that there are only two types of inner angles of the V-shaped
nanorods, one is about 114u and another is about 135u, as
measured from Fig. 6a and b. The V-shaped TiO2 nanorods with
an inner angle of 114u were reported recently,40 while the angle of
135u is first observed in the present study. The inner angle of the
V-shaped nanorod, h, also can be calculated from the HRTEM
image by the following equation:
h~2cos{1
h1h2zk 1k 2
a2 z
l 1l 2
c2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffih1
2zk 1
2
a2 z
l 12
c2
! h2
2zk 2
2
a2 z
l 22
c2
!v uut
(1)
where (h1 k 1 l 1) and (h 2 k 2 l 2) are the indices of the crystal lattice
plane and the boundary plane, respectively, a (= 0.459 nm) and c
(= 0.296 nm) are the lattice constants of rutile TiO2. The
calculation results show that the angle between plane (200)a and
(200)b is 114.4u (Fig. 7a), while that in Fig. 7b is 134.9u, which
are in good agreement with the measured results shown in Fig. 6.
From Fig. 7, one also can see that the grain boundaries of the
two branch crystals in both types of V-shaped nanorods are all
(101) lattice planes and the crystal lattice planes on both sides are
symmetrical indicating that the grain boundary is a coherent
twin boundary.
The time evolution of the hydrothermal process was analyzed
to further investigate the formation mechanism of the N-dopedTiO2 nanorods. Fig. 8 shows the XRD patterns of the products
at different hydrothermal times. One can see that there is only a
very small amount of rutile phase TiO2 (about 6 at %) when
hydrothermally treated for only one hour, and most of the
nanopowder is still TiN phase. The XRD peak intensity of the
TiN phase decreases while that of the rutile TiO2 phase increases
with increasing hydrothermal time, indicating the increase in the
content of rutile TiO2 phase. When the hydrothermal time was
increased to 12 h, all the TiN was transformed to TiO2. The
Fig. 5 (a) TEM and (b) HRTEM images of N-doped TiO2 straight
nanorods. The arrow in (a) shows the zigzag edge of the nanorods, and
the inset in (b) is the corresponding SAED pattern.
Fig. 6 TEM images of V-shaped N-doped TiO2 nanorods: (a) type I, (b)
type II and (c) a mass of V-shaped N-doped TiO 2 nanorods.
Fig. 7 HRTEM images of V-shaped N-doped TiO2 nanorods: (a) type I
and (e) type II. The insets are corresponding SEAD patterns of (b) grain
a, (c) junction and (d) grain b in type I V-shaped nanorod, (f) grain a, (g)
junction and (h) grain b in type II V-shaped nanorod.
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679 | 7675
View Article Online
7/23/2019 Nitrogen Doped TiO2 NRs
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nitrogen-doped-tio2-nrs 5/8
phase percentage of TiN and TiO2, as estimated from the
reference intensity ratio methods using corundum as an internal
standard, is listed in Table 1. It is worth to note that no anatase
or brookite phase was detected in all products, indicating that
the TiN precursor transforms directly to TiO2 rutile phase.
In the hydrothermal synthesis, the classic Ostwald ripening
(OR) growth mechanism, referring to a process where larger
particles grow at the expense of smaller ones, is a common
crystal growth mechanism. The growth rate of larger particles is
directly proportional to the solubility of the solid and the tension
of the solid–liquid interface, and is affected by particle size
distribution.41 Oriented attachment (OA) is an alternative
growth pathway, in which larger crystals form by crystal-
lographically controlled assembly of smaller nanocrystals.42
Fig. 9 shows the TEM images of the products synthesized at
different hydrothermal times. One can see that after hydro-
thermal reaction for 1 h, the product still consists of spherical
nanocrystals, and some nanocrystals increase in size in compar-
ison with the TiN precursor (Fig. S3{). It is worth noting that
some nanocrystals connect with each other, as shown in Fig. 9a,
implying the orientation attachment of some rutile TiO2
nanocrystals. With increasing hydrothermal time, the TiO2
nanocrystals grow in size and transform into nanorods (Fig. 9b
and c). The formation of rutile TiO2 grains is considered to be
derived directly from TiN nanocrystals where N separates out
with the assistance of HCl under the hydrothermal condition.
We found that the transformation from TiN to TiO2 can not
happen without the assistance of HCl (Fig. S4{). The chemical
reactions in the transformation from TiN to TiO2 can be
described by the following equations:43
TiN A Ti3+ + N32
Ti3+ + H2O A Ti(OH)2 + H+
Ti(OH)2 + O2 A Ti(IV)oxo species
Ti(IV)oxo species + N speciesA
TiO22xNx
where the Ti(IV) oxo species is an intermediate between TiO2+
and TiO2, consisting of partly dehydrated polymeric Ti(IV)
hydroxide.44,45 In the present case, Ti(OH)2 is derived from the
precursor solution (Ti3+N32) and O2 may come from either the
autoclave or the reaction solution. The N species separating from
TiN provides the nitrogen source for the self doping of the TiO2
nanocrystal.
It was found that the V-shaped TiO2 nanorod forms at the
early stage in the hydrothermal process, in which small grains
aggregate into some V-shaped cores by OA growth model and
then grow in size, see the white arrows in Fig. 9. In a nanoscale
system, the surface free energy accounts for a significant share intotal free energy, and the low energy surface will dominate,
accompanying the elimination of the high energy surface in the
crystal growth process. Due to much lower surface free energy
compared with other planes, the (110) plane will be inclined to
form to lower the system total free energy.46 Under the
hydrothermal condition, TiO2 nanocrystals have a high mobility.
The orientations of TiO2 nanocrystals can be adjusted to achieve
a thermodynamically stable state, and thus can lead to the
formation of V-shaped TiO2 by the OA growth model.
Based on above analysis, a possible formation mechanism of
the straight and V-shaped nanorods is schematically illustrated
in Fig. 10. Firstly, small primary TiO2 grains are anisotropically
Fig. 8 XRD patterns of the products obtained at different hydro-
thermal times (h). The JCPDS card no. 38-1420 is TiN and JCPDS card
no. 04-0551 is rutile TiO2.
Table 1 TiO2 contents after hydrothermal treatment for different times
Time (h) TiN (at %) Rutile TiO2 (at %)
1 94 62 56 444 14 868 2 98
12 0 100
Fig. 9 TEM images of products hydrothermally treated for the times of
(a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 4 and (d) 8 h. The black arrows in (a) show the connection
of some nanoparticles, and the white arrows show the formation of
V-shaped nanorods and increase in their size.
7676 | CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679 This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
7/23/2019 Nitrogen Doped TiO2 NRs
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nitrogen-doped-tio2-nrs 6/8
derived from TiN, in which the (110), (111) and (200) facets
survive due to their relatively lower surface free energy.46 Other
facets with a high energy surface, such as (101), disappear and
are hard to expose. Then, these TiO2 grains aggregate to form
nanorods by the OA growth model, and then grow in size along
the [001] direction. The small V-shaped nanocrystal forms by the
OA mechanism through attaching two similar grains, in which
two (101) high energy planes join together and are eliminated, and
finally follows the OR coarsening process. The formation of the
V-shaped nanocrystal is essentially a facet-mediated aggregation
and there is sequential elimination of high energy surfaces, owing
to the significant contribution of surface energy to the total free
energy in a nanoscale system. The formation of the V-shaped TiO2
nanorods provides a typical case for a facet-mediated aggregation,
which has essentially significance for tailoring or constructing
complex nanorod derived nanostructures.
It was found that the hydrothermal temperature and HCl
concentration also affect the shape and size of the N-doped TiO2.
Fig. 11 shows the morphologies of the products hydrothermally
treated at different temperatures and HCl concentrations for 12 h.One can see that the size of TiO2 nanorods increases with
increasing temperature due to the accelerated OR process at
elevated temperatures, see Fig. 11a–d. At low HCl concentration,
there exist some irregular polygon nanocrystals among the TiO2
nanorods, see Fig. 11e and f, and these irregular polygon
nanocrystals almost disappear at high HCl concentration, see
Fig. 11g and h. It should be noted that the V-shaped TiO2
nanorods can be observed in all conditions, indicating the
formation of V-shaped nanorods is an inherent property of the
transformation from TiN to N-doped TiO2 nanocrystals. It is
reported that the roleof Cl2 can be two-fold:43 one is retarding the
formation of TiO2 by changing the composition or coordination
structure of the growing unit,47
and another is influencing themorphology through adsorption of Cl21 onto the (110) plane of
rutile TiO2.48 In our case, the high Cl2 concentration will facilitate
the nucleation and growth of rutile phase nanorods. This result
indicates that the shape and size of N-doped TiO2 nanorods can
be easily adjusted by changing the hydrothermal reaction
conditions. Further XPS analyses show that the N doping content
decreases with the increasing HCl concentration, and is about
1.49, 1.38 and 1.09 at % for 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 M HCl, respectively.
The color of the N-doped TiO2 nanorods is slightly pale blue, in
contrast to the white color of rutile TiO2 nanopowders. Fig. 12
shows the diffuse reflectance spectra of N-doped TiO2 nanorods
synthesised by hydrothermal treatment at 180 uC with different
HCl concentrations and that of pure rutile TiO2 nanopowders. A
substantial enhancement in the visible light absorption can be seen
for N-doped TiO2 nanorods in comparison with pure rutile TiO2
nanopowders, which is consistent with the pale blue color of the
sample, and is considered to be due to the doping of N ions in
TiO2. Because of the sharp absorption edge of the N-doped TiO2
nanorods, the optical band gap energy can be calculated directly
by extrapolating the linear portion of the absorption edge to zero
of the absorbance, as shown in the inset in Fig. 12. Based on this,
the optical band gap is calculated to be about 2.98, 2.94 and
2.91 eV for the N-doped TiO2 nanorods with HCl concentrations
of 1.09, 1.38 and 1.49 at %, respectively. The optical band gap forpure rutile TiO2 nanopowders is about 3.01 eV, which is in a good
agreement with the reported value. The optical band gap, E g,
obtained by this method is more rational than that calculated by
extrapolating the linear portion of the (ahn)n vs. hn plot to a = 0
from the general relation of (ahn)n = B (hn2E g) (n = 1/2 or 2,
depending on whether the transition is indirect or direct,
respectively) (Fig. S5{). One can see the band gap of TiO2
nanorods decreases obviously upon N doping, and the higher the
doping content, the lower the optical band gap. This red-shift is
considered to be dueto the increased number of N ions in the TiO2
nanorods. From Fig. 12 one also can see that there is a tail-up in
the region of 500–800 nm. In fact, we found that this tail-up
Fig. 10 Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of straight
and V-shaped N-doped TiO2 nanorods, the four-sided top is clearly
indicated.
Fig. 11 FESEM images of the products prepared at temperatures of (a)
160, (b) 180, (c) 200 and (d) 220 uC with 2.0 M HCl concentration, and at
HCl concentrations of (e) 0.25, (f) 0.5, (g) 1.0 and (h) 2.0 M at 180 uC.
The hydrothermal time is 12 h for all the conditions.
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679 | 7677
View Article Online
7/23/2019 Nitrogen Doped TiO2 NRs
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nitrogen-doped-tio2-nrs 7/8
disappeared if the N-doped TiO2 nanorods were annealed at
500 uC in air. As both XPS and Raman analyses denied the
existence of TiN in the N-doped TiO2 nanorods, it is thus
considered the tail-up is due to the relative high N doping content
in TiO2.
It was found that by adjusting the hydrothermal solvent and
pH value of the precursor solution, N-doped anatase or anatase/
rutile TiO2 nanopowders, nanorods and even nanospheres can be
obtained.
The decrease in band gap and the increase in visible light
absorption are beneficial in enhancing the performance in dye-
sensitized solar cells and photo-catalysis, further work isunderway.
Conclusion
N-doped TiO2 nanorods have been synthesized directly from a
TiN precursor by a facile hydrothermal method in the presence
of HCl solution. The nanorods are highly crystalline with a rutile
phase, and exhibit both straight and V-shaped morphologies. It
was found that the lower the HCl concentration, the higher the
N doping content and 1.09 at% N doping can be obtained for
2.0 M HCl concentration. There are two types of the V-shaped
N-doped TiO2 nanorods, one with a 114.4u
inner angle andanother with an angle of 134.9u, and these two types of V-shaped
nanorods have the same coherent boundary of the (101) plane.
The size and shape of the N-doped TiO2 nanorods can be
controlled by the hydrothermal conditions. The oriented
attachment and Ostwald ripening are considered responsible
for the formation and growth of the straight and V-shaped
N-doped TiO2 nanorods. The band gap decreases and visible
light absorption increases with increasing N doping content for
the N-doped TiO2 nanorods. Our results not only add a new
number in the V-shaped nanorod family but provide a simple
route to prepare N-doped TiO2 nanostructures, which will
benefit both basic research and practical applications.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Basic
Research Program of China (2012CB932303), and innovation
project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KJCX2-YW-H2O).
References
1 B. O’Regan and M. Gratzel, Nature, 1991, 353, 737–740.2 M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi and D. W. Bahnemann,
Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 69–96.3 C. Wang, C. Bottcher, D. W. Bahnemann and J. K. Dohrmann,
J. Mater. Chem., 2003, 13, 2322–2329.4 S. Klosek and D. Raftery, J. Phys. Chem. B , 2001, 105, 2815–2819.5 Q. Jin, T. Ikeda, M. Fujishima and H. Tada, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47, 8814–8816.6 M. Anpo and M. Takeuchi, J. Catal., 2003, 216, 505–516.7 R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki and Y. Taga, Science,
2001, 293, 269–271.8 X. Tang and D. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C , 2008, 112, 5405–5409.9 W. Ho, J. C. Yu and S. Lee, Chem. Commun., 2006, 1115–1117.
10 J. Yu, G. Dai, Q. Xiang and M. Jaroniec, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21,1049–1057.
11 T. Ihara, M. Miyoshi, Y. Iriyama, O. Matsumoto and S. Sugihara,Appl. Catal., B , 2003, 42, 403–409.
12 C. Di Valentin, E. Finazzi, G. Pacchioni, A. Selloni, S. Livraghi,M. C. Paganini and E. Giamello, Chem. Phys., 2007, 339, 44–56.
13 J. Zhang, Y. Wu, M. Xing, S. A. K. Leghari and S. Sajjad, EnergyEnviron. Sci., 2010, 3, 715–726.
14 A. Ghicov, J. M. Macak, H. Tsuchiya, J. Kunze, V. Haeublein, L.Frey and P. Schmuki, Nano Lett., 2006, 6, 1080–1082.
15 H. Irie, Y. Watanabe and K. Hashimoto, J. Phys. Chem. B , 2003,107, 5483–5486.
16 C. Burda, Y. Lou, X. Chen, A. C. S. Samia, J. Stout and J. L. Gole,Nano Lett., 2003, 3, 1049–1051.
17 Y. Aita, M. Komatsu, S. Yin and T. Sato, J. Solid State Chem., 2004,177, 3235–3238.
18 F. Peng, L. Cai, L. Huang, H. Yu and H. Wang, J. Phys. Chem.Solids, 2008, 69, 1657–1664.
19 Z. Jiang, F. Yang, N. Luo, B. T. T. Chu, D. Sun, H. Shi, T. Xiao andP. P. Edwards, Chem. Commun., 2008, 6372–6374.
20 Z. Wu, F. Dong, W. Zhao and S. Guo, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, 157,57–63.
21 S. V. Didziulis, J. R. Lince, T. B. Stewart and E. A. Eklund, Inorg.Chem., 1994, 33, 1979–1991.
22 N. C. Saha and H. G. Tompkins, J. Appl. Phys., 1992, 72, 3072–3079.23 Y. X. Zhang, G. H. Li, Y. X. Jin, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang and L. D.
Zhang, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2002, 365, 300–304.24 P. D. Cozzoli, A. Kornowski and H. Weller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,
125, 14539–14548.25 W. Zhou, X. Liu, J. Cui, D. Liu, J. Li, H. Jiang, J. Wang and H. Liu,
CrystEngComm, 2011, 13, 4557–4563.26 Y. Wang, J. Y. Lee and T. C. Deivaraj, J. Phys. Chem. B , 2004, 108,
13589–13593.27 C. A. Chen, Y. M. Chen, K. Y. Chen, J. K. Chi, Y. S. Huang and
D. S. Tsai, J. Alloys Compd., 2009, 485, 524–528.28 P. D. Cozzoli, L. Manna, M. L. Curri, S. Kudera, C. Giannini, M.
Striccoli and A. Agostiano, Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 1296–1306.29 T. Guillet, R. Grousson, V. Voliotis, X. L. Wang and M. Ogura,
Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 2003, 68, 045319.30 Y. W. Jun, S. M. Lee, N. J. Kang and J. Cheon, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2001, 123, 5150–5151.31 M. Sathish, B. Viswanathan, R. P. Viswanath and C. S. Gopinath,
Chem. Mater., 2005, 17, 6349–6353.32 X. Cheng, X. Yu and Z. Xing, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2012, 258, 3244–3248.33 J. Wang, W. Zhu, Y. Zhang and S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. C , 2007, 111,
1010–1014.34 Y. Cong, J. Zhang, F. Chen and M. Anpo, J. Phys. Chem. C , 2007,
111, 6976–6982.35 C. Chen, H. Bai and C. Chang, J. Phys. Chem. C , 2007, 111,
15228–15235.36 H. Chen, A. Nambu, W. Wen, J. Graciani, Z. Zhong, J. C. Hanson,
E. Fujita and J. A. Rodriguez, J. Phys. Chem. C , 2007, 111,1366–1372.
Fig. 12 UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of N-doped TiO2 nanorods
with different HCl concentrations and pure rutile TiO2 nanopowders.
The inset is a plot of absorption versus energy in the absorption edge
region.
7678 | CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679 This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
7/23/2019 Nitrogen Doped TiO2 NRs
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nitrogen-doped-tio2-nrs 8/8
37 L. D. Arsov, C. Kormann and W. Plieth, J. Raman Spectrosc., 1991,22, 573–575.
38 D. Bersani, P. P. Lottici and X. Z. Ding, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1998, 72, 73.39 W. F. Zhang, Y. L. He, M. S. Zhang, Z. Yin and Q. Chen, J. Phys. D:
Appl. Phys., 2000, 33, 912.40 W. Lu, B. Bruner, G. Casillas, J. He, M. Jose-Yacaman and P. J.
Farmer, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 3120–3124.41 I. M. Lifshitz and V. V. Slyozov, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1961, 19,
35–50.
42 R. L. Penn and J.F. Banfield, Geochim. Cosmochim.Ac, 1999,63, 1549–1557.43 E. Hosono, S. Fujihara, K. Kakiuchi and H. Imai, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2004, 126, 7790–7791.44 F. P. Rotzinger and M. Gratzel, Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26, 3704–3708.45 L. Kavan, B. O’Regan, A. Kay and M. Gratzel, J. Electroanal.
Chem., 1993, 346, 291–307.46 U. Diebold, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2003, 48, 53–229.47 H. Cheng, J. Ma, Z. Zhao and L. Qi, Chem. Mater., 1995, 7, 663–671.48 B. Liu and E. S. Aydil, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 3985–3990.
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 7672–7679 | 7679
View Article Online