nks vertical tracking( and etc) written at 2007/08/15
DESCRIPTION
NKS Vertical Tracking( and etc) written at 2007/08/15. Tohoku Univ. Kyo Tsukada. Method. More than three hits of four stereo wires are required. Two z candidates, z1 and z2, are found by the horizontal trajectory. The relation, z=a+bx, is assumed in local coordinate. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
NKS Vertical Tracking( and etc)written at 2007/08/15
Tohoku Univ.
Kyo Tsukada
Method
• More than three hits of four stereo wires are required.
• Two z candidates, z1 and z2, are found by the horizontal trajectory.
• The relation, z=a+bx, is assumed in local coordinate.
• From the least 2 method, most probably track is selected in 2^(numofstereohits) tracks.
Analyzer (1)
• DCAnalysis::TrackSearch()– Horizontal tracking– SDC1,2,3, CDC4,5,8,9,12,13 are used.
• DCAnalysis::VerticalTrackSearch()– Vertical tracking– CDC6,7,10,11 are used.– Z information of vertical wires are calculated from vertical track
ing.
• PTrack::calcObservables()– Calculating the Time of flight, flight length, , mass, and so on.– The vertical angle of the track is estimated. The priority is as fo
llows,1. Result of PTrack::calcVerticalTrack().2. Z-information of OH as outer-side and the origin as other side.
Analyzer (2)
• PTrack::calcVerticalTrack()– Vertical tracking
– CDC6,7,10,11, IH and OH are used.
– z1 and z2 are already found in DCTrack::VerticalTrackSearch().
– dz of IH and OHH ~ zlen/sqrt(12), OHV ~ 2cm
– Z information of vertical wires are estimated from vertical tracking.
• ParticleAnalysis::SetTimeZeroCorrection(…)– Correcting the Time of DC by
• Time of IH associated a track
• Time difference between slow particle and electron.
• Tracking and vertical tracking again.
• PVertex3D::ConstructVertex()– Constructing a vertex from 3D tracjectories.
Search Nearest Hit
• For the killed layer method, DCTrack::SearchNearestHit is important.
• Now, it can work even for stereo layers.• We can also get the drift length calculated from trajectory
position.
We can derive the X-T curve of stereo layers.
X-T curves (before adjusting)
Stereo Layers
run1150
X-T curves (after adjusting)
Stereo Layers
run1150
Resolutions of January data
• 915.param : run915
• 908-925.param : run917
• 929-952.param : run940
• 956-968.param : run960
• 972-991.param : run981
• 992-1017.param : run 1006
• 1022-147.param : run1036
• 1051-1071.param : run1065
• 1075-1097.param : run1085
• 1101-1122.param : run1112
• Right figures show the mean and sigma of gaussian fits for the run used to adjust parameters.
Resolutions of all run
• Bottom figures show the mean and sigma of gaussian fits for all run.
• The time dependence of sigmas are reasonable because of the lack of the chamber gas at the beginning of the experiment.
• The mean of the residual is good only for the run used to adjust parameters.
• At least, the offset parameters should be corrected run by run.
Plane efficiencies of January data
• Bottom figures show the efficiencies for the run used to adjust parameters.
• The efficiencies are estimated in the range, 20degree<| angle |.
• Right bottom figures are the efficiencies with the distance cut, distance < 1.5*cellsize.
Vertical angular resolution (1)
z@OHVL2 from OHz@OHVL2 from OH w/EV
z@OHVL6 from OHz@OHVL6 from OH w/EV
z@OHVL2 from DCz@OHVL2 from DC w/EV
z@OHVL6 from DCz@OHVL6 from DC w/EV
z@OHVL2 from OHz@OHVL2 from OH w/EV
z@OHVL6 from OHz@OHVL6 from OH w/EV
z@OHVL2 from DCz@OHVL2 from DC w/EV
z@OHVL6 from DCz@OHVL6 from DC w/EV
-0.9 < cosOA < 0.8
The bump due to EV is clearly seen.
Run1128-1157
Vertical angular resolution (2)
-0.9 < cosOA < 0.8Run1128-1157
Vertical angular resolution (3)
• Vertical distribution for each OH w/ EV.• For OHVL4 and OHVR4, the correspondence between OH and EV
are wrong.
Run1128-1157
Vertical angular resolution (4)
• By taking the difference of adjacent bins, the resolutions are estimated.
• The shadow of EV and the edges of OH are used.
Run1128-1157
Vertical angular resolution (5)
• The positions of the edges of EV and the vertex resolutions are estimated.
• The width of EV is 5 cm.• From tracking, the widths seems to be little narrow (?).• The sigma is less than 1 cm.
Left Right
Run1128-1157
Vertical angular resolution (6)
• The positions of the edges of OH and the vertex resolutions are estimated.
• The height of OHV is 74.8 cm.• From tracking, the heights seems to be little small (?).• The sigma is about 1 cm.
Left Right
Run1128-1157
Vertical angular resolution (7)
• The positions of the edges of OH and the vertex resolutions are estimated.
• Because the distribution is not flat, the fittings are done for one side of each OH.
• From tracking, the heights seems to be little low (?).
• The sigma is about 1-2 cm.
Run1128-1157
Vertex resolutions in 3D
• Vertex resolution– The dx is estimated by the difference of the distribution.
– I could not find how to estimate the dy and dz.
– Right figures show the vertex distributions in target.
– If the beam size is negligible, this distributions give dy and dz.
Run1128-1157
Run1150
Resolution of Vertical angle
1. The vertical resolution at target is about 2 mm.
2. The vertical resolution at OH is about 10 mm.
3. The radius of OH from origin is typically 120 cm.
The angular resolution (d) is about 8.5 mrad.
Summary
• The vertical tracking works well.• For DC tracking, the time information of IH and OH are used.
• The plane resolutions are about 500 um for CDC and 300 um for SDC. These values include the tracking resolution.
• We should adjust the drift parameters run by run.• The plane efficiency are more than 98% in stable runs. But, in this st
udy, the efficiencies in the forward region are not estimated.
• The vertical position resolutions are about 10mm@OH and 2mm@target.
• The vertical angular resolution is about 8.5 mrad.• The z-position of the vertex point can be calculated.