8/9/2019 nl25 rev

1/3

MARLON DAVIS HAS DONE some impressive work on the left hand of thecreature seen in the P/G film. Using the still frames created by Rick Noll,Marlon made a blink animation that shows the thumb wiggling. The handthen reminded me of the hand cast made from a print found by Paul Freeman

(see page 143 Meet the Sasquatch . I prepared this illustration to show thesimilarity. I sent the animation to a number of researchers - for the record,John Green and Dr. Henner Fahrenbach were not impressed. Nevertheless,for what it is worth, I think we see the thumb, and we see it moving, just aswe see the entire hand in different configurations in various frames.

Aside from my Freeman hand cast speculation, the specific thumb movementappears to me to be another indication that the hand was not a fabrication ofsome sort. For certain, the length of the creature's arms is far beyond thehuman norm. Such occurs in only one out of 52.5 million people (Glickman,1998, Toward a Resolution of the Bigfoot Phenomenon, p.15). If the creature

was a fabrication, therefore, an arm extension with a moveable hand (controlled fingers) had to have been

used. This is certainly not impossible, but highly improbable .

Shown here is the arm extension/false hand used in themovie Sasquatch , (2003). The fingers/thumb arecontrolled by wires that are attached to finger ringsfurther back in the arm. One merely puts hisfingers/thumb in the rings and when the rings are pulled(i.e., one closes his hand), the extension digits close. Iwas told that this single arm cost $10,000 to make (See Meet the Sasquatch , page 100). I really don't thinkRoger Patterson would have (or indeed could have) made something like this.

MARLON HAS ALSO identified what appears to me to be the creaturesear. If it is such, then Patterson certainly went to a lot of trouble in makingthe helmet type headgear that Bob Heironimus said he wore in the allegedhoax scenario. Davis did a bit of a comparison with Heironimuss ear, andthe two did not match. As ears go, it appears to me that what we see hereis somewhat human-like.

THIS REMARKABLE BAS RELIEFSCULPTURE FOUND by WilliamHangar shows what appears to be aStegosaurus. What makes itremarkable is that the sculpture is ona temple in Angkor, Cambodia, thatis only 800 years old. While that'sold in human terms, the Stegosaurusdisappeared about 70 million yearsago. So where on earth did a 13thCentury Cambodian monk get theinspiration to make such a sculpture? The head is not quite the same, I agree, but the rest of it is very close.The story of the finding is featured on Jan Sundberg's website >http://www.cryptozoology.st/

8/9/2019 nl25 rev

2/3

original material is on Loren Colemans Cryptomundo site, and he presents some extensive research on thesubject. < http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/euro-stego/>.

The sasquatch connection here is associated with what have been determined extinct creatures beingobserved long after they have gone. In other words, is it possible the Gigantopithecus and / or some relicthominid, in the case of the almasty, has actually survived into this century?

I RECENTLY HEARD FROM Professor Roderick Rick Sprague. Rick isnoted for his research on the stone heads (see Meet the Sasquatch , page10), and I was very pleased to hear from him. Shown here is a photo of oneof the stone heads along with the stone foot (see Meet the Sasquatch , page12) that I had on display at my sasquatch exhibit in Vancouver. We believethat both of these artifacts are possibly sasquatch-related and are likely theoldest in that regard. One thing Rick mentioned to me is that he agrees thatthe word sasquatch should not be capitalized. There has been all sorts ofdiscussion on this in the past, and your computer spell-checker will probablyindicate that a capital is required. If you check a dictionary, you will see thatthe word yeti is not capitalized, so why should sasquatch or bigfoot have

a capital? Anyway, just keep this in mind if you are preparing anything for publication on sasquatch/bigfoot.

JIM BURGTORF offered an explanation for my question regarding why UFOs dont appear to make any noise.Jim states that according to Paul Hill in his book , Unconventional Flying Objects , UFOs are not pushed throughair, but are propelled as a unit including everything in them a kind of reactionless drive. The air around theUFO is, moved out of the way, no matter what the speed. Although this goes beyond me somewhat, theresdefinitely something happening, unless UFOs are in reality something else. As Jeff Meldrum points out, it isvery odd that supposed superior beings choose to severely limit their contact with us.

I SEE TOM BISCARDI is involved in the finding of a giant human skeleton (see hiswebsite: >http://www.searchingforbigfoot.com