no. 88/permentan/pp.340/12/2011 concerning plant...
TRANSCRIPT
REGULATION OF MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
NO. 88/Permentan/PP.340/12/2011
CONCERNING
FOOD SAFETY CONTROL OVER IMPORT AND EXPORT OF FRESH FOOD OF
PLANT ORIGIN
WITH THE GRACE OF THE ALMIGHTY GOD
THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
Considering:
a. that, Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
27/Permentan/PP.340/5/2009 has stipulated provisions on food
safety control over import and export of fresh food of plant
origin;
b. that, with the development of science and technology, and
society’s demand concerning food quality and safety,
Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
27/Permentan/PP.340/5/2009 is no longer suitable and should be
reviewed;
c. that, based on the considerations of paragraphs a and b, it is
necessary to re-stipulate Food Safety Control Over Import and
Export of Fresh Food of Plant Origin by Regulation of Minister
of Agriculture;
2
In view of:
1. Law No. 16/1992 on Animal, Fish, and Plant Quarantine (Statute
Book of 1992 No. 56, Supplement No. 3482);
2. Law No. 7/1994 on Ratification of Agreement Establishing the
World Trade Organization (Statute Book of 1994 No. 576,
Supplement No. 3554);
3. Law No. 7/1996 on Food (Statute Book of 1996 No. 99,
Supplement No. 3556);
4. Law No. 8/1999 on Consumer Protection (Statute Book of 1999
No. 42, Supplement No. 3821);
5. Government Regulation No. 102/2000 on National Standardization
(Statute Book of 2000 No. 199, Supplement No. 4020);
6. Government Regulation No. 14/2002 on Plant Quarantine (Statute
Book of 2002 No. 35, Supplement No. 4196);
7. Government Regulation No. 28/2004 on Food Safety, Quality, and
Nutrition (Statute Book of 2004 No. 107, Supplement No. 4424);
8. Presidential Decree No. 84/P/2009 on Establishment of United
Indonesia Cabinet II;
3
9. Presidential Regulation No. 47/2009 on Establishment and
Organization of State Ministry;
10.Presidential Regulation No. 24/2010 on Position, Task, and
Function of State Ministry and Structure of Organization,
Task, and Function of Echelon I of State Ministry;
11.Regulation of Minister of Health No. 239/Men.Kes/Per/V/1985
on Certain Coloring Substances Declared as Hazardous
Materials;
12.Joint Decree of Minister of Health and Minister of
Agriculture No. 881/MENKES/SKB/VIII/1996 and No.
711/Kpts/TP.270/8/1996 on Maximum Limit of Pesticide Residue
in Agricultural Products;
13.Regulation of Minister of Health No. 1168/Menkes/Kes/X/1999
on Additives Prohibited from Use in Food;
14.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
37/Kpts/HK.060/1/2006 on Technical Requirement and Plant
Quarantine Action on Import of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables to
Indonesian Territory;
15.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
32/Permentan/OT/140/3/2007 on Prohibition on Use of Hazardous
4
Chemical Materials in Paddy Milling Process, Huller, and Rice
Polishing;
16.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
18/Permentan/OT.140/2/2008 on Plant Quarantine Requirement and
Action on Import of Live Plant Products in The Form of Fresh
Bulbs;
17.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
22/Permentan/OT.140/4/2008 on Organization and Work Procedure
of Agricultural Quarantine Technical Operating Unit;
18.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
35/Permentan/OT.140/7/2008 on Requirement and Application of
Good Manufacturing Practices on Agricultural Products of Plant
Origin (Good Manufacturing Practices;
19.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
44/Permentan/OT.140/10/2009 on Guidelines for Good Post-
Harvest Handling of Agricultural Products of Plant Origin
(Good Handling Practices);
20.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
09/Permentan/OT.140/2009 on Quarantine Action Requirement and
Procedure on Import of Carrier of Organism Harmful to
Quarantine Plants to Indonesian Territory;
5
21.Decree of Minister of Agriculture No. 3237/Kpts/HK.060/9/2009
on Form and Type of Document on Plant Quarantine Action and
Safety of Fresh Food of Plant Origin;
22.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
46/Permerntan/HK.340/8/2010 on Places of Entry and Exit of
Carrier of Quarantine Animal Pests and Diseases and Organism
Harmful to Quarantine Plants;
23.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
56/Permentan/OT.140/9/2010 on Implementation of Quarantine
Action Outside Places of Entry and Exit;
24.Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
61/Permentan/OT.140/10/2010 on Organization and Work Procedure
of Ministry of Agriculture;
Observing:
1. Principles for Food Import and Export Inspection and
Certification (CAC/GL 20-1995);
2. Guidelines for Food Import and Export Control Systems (CAC/GL
47-2003);
6
3. Guidelines for the Design, Operation, Assessment, and
Accreditation of Food Import and Export Inspection and
Certification Systems (CAC/GL 26-1997);
4. Guidelines on the Judgment of Equivalence of Sanitary Measures
Associated with Food Inspection and Certification Systems
(CAC/GL 53-2003);
5. Codex Alimentarius Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program Volume
2B, Pesticide Residues in Food – Maximum Residue Limits,
Second Edition, 2000;
6. Assuring Food Safety and Quality Guidelines for Strengthening
National Food Control Systems, FAO and WHO, 2003;
7. Codex General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food,
CODEX STAN 193-1995, Rev. 2-2006;
8. Indonesian National Standard (SNI) on maximum limit of
microbial contaminant in food. SNI 7388:2009;
DECIDED:
To stipulate: REGULATION OF THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE ON FOOD
SAFETY CONTROL OVER IMPORT AND EXPORT OF FRESH FOOD
OF PLANT ORIGIN.
CHAPTER I
7
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1
Hereinafter referred to as:
1. Fresh Food of Plant Origin, hereinafter called PSAT, is food
of plant origin in the form of product produced in
post-harvest processing for consumption or industrial raw
material and/or product which experiences minimal processing.
2. PSAT Safety is condition and attempt required to prevent PSAT
from potential chemical contaminant, biological contaminant,
and/or containing prohibited chemical substances that may
disturb, damage, and is hazardous to human health;
3. Chemical Contaminant is chemical substances (pesticide
residue, heavy metal, and mycotoxin) contained in PSAT
unintentionally through agricultural practices.
4. Biological Contaminant is biological agents (virus, bacteria,
microbe, mold, and yeast) that could contaminate PSAT.
5. Prohibited Chemical Substances are hazardous chemical
compounds prohibited from use in PSAT.
8
6. Prior Notice is a statement letter in the form of a Form
stating about identity of PSAT that must be filled out by PSAT
producer or exporter in country of origin.
7. PSAT Safety Requirement is standard and other regulation that
must be fulfilled to prevent PSAT from potential hazard due to
chemical contaminant, biological contaminant and/or content of
prohibited chemical substances that may disturb, damage, and
is hazardous to human health;
8. Import is import of PSAT from overseas to Indonesian territory
through the designated places of entry.
9. Export is export of PSAT from Indonesian territory to overseas
through the designated places of exit.
10.Place of Entry/Exit is seaport, river port, airport,
transshipment port, dry port, post office, inter-country cross
border posts designated as places of entry/exit.
11.Recognition is acceptance of PSAT safety control system of a
country producing and exporting PSAT by Indonesia’s PSAT
safety competent authority.
12.Equivalence Agreement is agreement between importing country
and exporting country concerning different PSAT safety control
system but produces equal level of PSAT safety protection.
9
13.Recognition of PSAT Safety System of PSAT Production Site is
acceptance of PSAT safety system of PSAT production site of a
country by Indonesia’s PSAT safety competent authority.
14.Plant Quarantine Officer is functional officer controlling
organism harmful to plants who work at Agricultural Quarantine
Institution.
15.Surveillance is a series of activities performed to assess
level of compliance of country of origin whose PSAT safety
system has been recognized by Indonesia (Government of the
Republic of Indonesia).
16.PSAT Owner or His Proxy, hereinafter called Owner or Proxy,
is a person or legal entity who owns PSAT and/or is
responsible for import or export of PSAT.
17.Type of PSAT is every type of PSAT that becomes subject of
food safety control test.
Article 2
(1)This Regulation is intended as basis for the implementation
of PSAT safety control imported to or exited from Indonesian
territory.
10
(2)The objective of this Regulation is so that PSAT imported to
Indonesian territory does not contain chemical and biological
contaminants that exceed the maximum limit and prohibited
chemical substances so that it is safe and fit for
consumption, and PSAT which is exported from Indonesian
territory meets requirements of destination country.
Article 3
The scope of the regulation includes import, surveillance,
freeze, and re-recognition of control system of PSAT safety and
PSAT export.
CHAPTER II
IMPORT
Part One
General
Article 4
(1)Every person who imports PSAT shall be responsible for PSAT
safety in accordance with the legislation.
(2)PSAT safety as referred to in paragraph (1) is a condition of
PSAT which contains chemical and biological contaminants not
exceeding the maximum limit, and not containing prohibited
chemical substances.
11
(3)Type of PSAT, maximum limit of chemical contaminants, maximum
limit of biological contaminants, and prohibited chemical
substances as referred to in paragraph (2), are as specified
in Attachment I as an inseparable part of this Regulation.
Article 5
(1)Food safety control over import of PSAT may only be performed
through:
a. inspection of PSAT import;
b. recognition of PSAT safety control system of a country;
c. equivalence agreement between Indonesia and country of
origin or destination of PSAT; or
d. recognition of PSAT safety control in production site.
(2)Food safety control on import of PSAT shall be performed by
document inspection, identity inspection, sampling, and/or
laboratory test.
(3)Recognition of PSAT safety control system of a country,
recognition of PSAT safety control system in production site
of country of origin, and/or equivalence agreement between
Indonesia and country of origin shall be conducted by the
Minister.
12
(4)The period of the recognition as referred to in paragraph (3)
is 2 (two) years.
(5)Procedure of recognition of PSAT safety control system of
country of origin, recognition of PSAT safety control system
in production site of a country, and/or equivalence agreement
between Indonesia and country of origin as referred to in
paragraph (2), is as specified in Attachment II as an
inseparable part of this Regulation.
Article 6
(1)PSAT import as referred to in Article 4 paragraph (1):
a. shall be completed with PSAT safety certificate/document
and prior notice from country of origin;
b. shall pass through the designated places of entry; and
c. shall be reported and submitted to Plant Quarantine Officer
at places of entry for PSAT safety control.
(2)PSAT safety certificate/document, as referred to in paragraph
(1) sub-paragraph a, is a written assurance given by competent
authority on food safety of country of origin stating that
PSAT is safe and fit for consumption.
13
(3)For country of origin which does not have PSAT safety
competent authority, such certificate/document as referred to
in paragraph (2) shall be issued by an institution authorized
to perform control and/or monitoring/surveillance over the
implementation of good practices to ensure PSAT safety.
(4)PSAT safety certificate/document from country of origin, as
referred to in paragraph (1) sub-paragraph a, is not required
for import of PSAT originating from a country or production
site which is already recognized and/or already has an
equivalence agreement.
(5)Prior notice, as referred to in paragraph (1) sub-paragraph
a, is in the form of a Form as specified in Attachment III as
an inseparable part of this Regulation.
Part Two
Control Procedure over PSAT Import
Paragraph 1
Procedure of Control over PSAT Import from Country or Production
Site Whose PSAT Safety Control System is Not Recognized or
Does Not Have Equivalence Agreement
Article 7
14
(1)Owner or proxy shall report and submit PSAT safety
certificate/document and prior notice from country of origin
as referred to in Article 6 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph a to
Plant Quarantine Officer at place of entry as referred to in
Article 6 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph b within not later upon
arrival of PSAT.
(2)If PSAT import is not completed with PSAT safety
certificate/document and/or prior notice as referred to in
paragraph (1), detention shall be performed, and the owner or
proxy is given a time of not later than 14 (fourteen) working
days to complete the PSAT safety certificate/document and/or
prior notice.
(3)Detention as referred to in paragraph (2) is performed to
secure PSAT by sealing and placing PSAT under control and
supervision of Plant Quarantine Officer.
(4)If within the time period as referred to in paragraph (2),
the owner or proxy did not complete PSAT safety
certificate/document and/or prior notice, rejection shall be
performed.
(5)All costs arising as a result of detention shall be imposed
on the owner or proxy.
15
Article 8
(1)If PSAT import is completed with PSAT safety
certificate/document as referred to in Article 7 paragraph
(1), Plant Quarantine Officer shall perform identity
inspection to identify compliance between information on the
PSAT safety certificate/document and prior notice with PSAT
identity on the package and physical condition of PSAT.
(2)In case that result of PSAT identity inspection as referred
to in paragraph (1) proves:
a. non-compliance between information on PSAT safety
certificate/document and prior notice with PSAT identity on
the package and/or physical condition of PSAT, rejection
shall be performed; or
b. compliance between information on PSAT safety
certificate/document and prior notice with PSAT identity on
the package and/or physical condition of PSAT, collection
of PSAT sample shall be performed to be followed with
laboratory test.
(3)During the laboratory test, as referred to in paragraph 2
sub-paragraph b, PSAT shall be under control and supervision
of Plant Quarantine Officer.
16
(4)Sampling procedure for laboratory test, as referred to in
paragraph (2) sub-paragraph b, is as specified in Attachment
IV as an inseparable part of this Regulation.
Article 9
(1)Laboratory test as referred to in Article 8 paragraph (2)
sub-paragraph b shall be performed at an accredited or
appointed laboratory.
(2)For performance of laboratory test, as referred to in
paragraph (1), selection of test laboratory shall be performed
by the owner or proxy.
(3)Cost of the laboratory test, as referred to in paragraph (2),
shall be borne by the owner or proxy.
(4)The appointed laboratory, as referred to in paragraph (1), is
as specified in Attachment V as an inseparable part of this
Regulation.
Article 10
In case that result of the laboratory test, as referred to in
Article 9 proves that:
a. chemical and biological contaminants exceed the maximum limit
and/or containing prohibited chemical substances, as referred
17
to in Article 4 paragraph (3), rejection shall be performed;
or
b. chemical and biological contaminants equal or do not exceed
the maximum limit and containing prohibited chemical
substances, as referred to in Article 4 paragraph (3), plant
quarantine action shall be performed in accordance with the
legislation.
Article 11
(1)Rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in Article 7
paragraph (4), Article 8 paragraph (2) sub-paragraph a, or
Article 10 paragraph a, shall be done by exporting PSAT from
Indonesian territory.
(2)Rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in paragraph (1),
shall be conveyed to the owner or proxy by Plant Quarantine
Officer in the form of letter of rejection along with the
reasons.
(3)Concerning rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in
paragraph (1), Head of Quarantine Agency Technical Operating
Unit shall submit notification of non-compliance to PSAT
safety competent authority of country of origin with a copy
submitted to Head of Agricultural Quarantine Agency.
18
(4)All costs required for the implementation of rejection, as
referred to in paragraph (1), shall be borne by the owner or
proxy.
Article 12
(1)If after 14 (fourteen) working days since date of rejection,
as referred to in Article 11 paragraph (1), PSAT is not
exported from Indonesian territory, destruction shall be
performed.
(2)In the implementation of destruction, as referred to in
paragraph (1), Plant Quarantine Officer shall issue a
destruction report.
(3)All costs required for the implementation of destruction, as
referred to in paragraph (2), shall be borne by the owner or
proxy.
Paragraph 2
Procedure of Control of PSAT Import from Country or Production
Site Whose PSAT Safety Control System is Recognized or Has an
Equivalence Agreement
Article 13
19
(1)Owner or proxy importing PSAT from a country or production
site whose PSAT safety control system is recognized or a
country who has an equivalence agreement, shall report and
submit prior notice, as referred to in Article 8 paragraph
(1), to Plant Quarantine Officer at place of entry within not
later than upon arrival of vehicle transporting PSAT.
(2)Upon arrival of PSAT at place of entry, Plant Quarantine
Officer shall perform identity inspection to identify
compliance between prior notice and identity on PSAT package
and physical condition of PSAT.
(3)In case that result of identity inspection, as referred to in
paragraph (2), proves:
a. non-compliance between information on prior notice with
PSAT identity on the package and/or physical condition of
PSAT, rejection shall be performed; or
b. compliance between information on prior notice with PSAT
identity on the package and/or physical condition of PSAT,
plant quarantine action shall be performed in accordance
with the legislation.
Article 14
20
(1)Rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in Article 13
paragraph (3) sub-paragraph a, shall be done by exporting PSAT
from Indonesian territory.
(2)Rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in paragraph (1),
shall be conveyed to the owner or proxy by Plant Quarantine
Officer in the form of a letter of rejection along with the
reasons.
(3)Concerning rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in
paragraph (1), Head of Agricultural Quarantine Agency
Technical Operating Unit shall submit a notification of non-
compliance to PSAT safety competent authority of country of
origin with a copy submitted to Head of Agricultural
Quarantine Agency.
(4)All costs required for the implementation of rejection, as
referred to in paragraph (1), shall be borne by the owner or
proxy.
Article 15
(1)If after 14 (fourteen) working days since date of rejection,
as referred to in Article 13 paragraph (3) sub-paragraph a,
PSAT is not exported from Indonesian territory, destruction
shall be performed.
21
(2)In the implementation of destruction, as referred to in
paragraph (1), Plant Quarantine Officer shall issue a
destruction report.
(3)All costs required for the implementation of destruction, as
referred to in paragraph (2), shall be borne by the owner or
proxy.
CHAPTER III
SURVEILLANCE
Article 16
(1)To prove compliance of a country or production site whose
food safety system has been recognized and/or country who has
had an equivalence agreement with Indonesia’s food safety
requirements, surveillance shall be performed.
(2)Surveillance, as referred to in paragraph (1), shall be
performed at any time upon import of PSAT through test of
content of chemical contaminants, biological contaminants, and
prohibited chemical substances.
(3)To perform surveillance, as referred to in paragraph (1),
Plant Quarantine Officer shall collect PSAT samples during
22
performance of PSAT identity inspection, as referred to in
Article 13 paragraph (2).
Article 17
(1)Surveillance, as referred to in Article 16 paragraph (2),
shall be performed at the laboratory, as referred to in
Article 9 paragraph (1).
(2)During laboratory test, as referred to in paragraph (1), PSAT
shall be under control and supervision of Plant Quarantine
Officer.
(3)Cost of the laboratory test, as referred to in paragraph (1),
shall be borne by Agricultural Quarantine Agency.
(4)Procedure of surveillance, as referred to in Article 16, is
as specified in Attachment VI as an inseparable part of this
Regulation.
Article 18
(1)In case that result of the laboratory test, as referred to in
Article 17 paragraph (1), proves that:
a. chemical contaminants and biological contaminants exceed
the maximum limit and/or containing prohibited chemical
23
substances, as referred to in Article 4 paragraph (3),
rejection shall be performed;
b. chemical contaminants and biological contaminants are equal
to or do not exceed the maximum limit and do not contain
prohibited chemical substances, as referred to in Article 4
paragraph (3), plant quarantine action shall be performed
in accordance with the legislation.
(2)Rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in paragraph (1)
sub-paragraph a, shall be done by exporting PSAT from
Indonesian territory.
(3)Rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in paragraph (1),
shall be conveyed to the owner or proxy by Plant Quarantine
Officer in the form of a letter of rejection along with the
reasons.
(4)Concerning rejection of PSAT import, as referred to in
paragraph (1), Head of Agricultural Quarantine Agency
Technical Operating Unit shall submit notification of non-
compliance to PSAT safety competent authority with a copy
submitted to Head of Agricultural Quarantine Agency.
24
(5)All costs required for the implementation of rejection, as
referred to in paragraph (1), shall be borne by the owner or
proxy.
Article 19
(1)If after 14 (fourteen) working days since date of rejection,
as referred to in Article 18 paragraph (1), PSAT is not
exported from Indonesian territory, destruction shall be
performed.
(2)In the implementation of destruction, as referred to in
paragraph (1), Plant Quarantine Officer shall issue
destruction report.
(3)All costs required for the implementation of destruction, as
referred to in paragraph (2), shall be borne by the owner or
proxy.
CHAPTER IV
FREEZE AND RE-RECOGNITION OF PSAT SAFETY CONTROL SYSTEM
Article 20
Freeze of recognition of food safety control system of PSAT of a
country, recognition of PSAT safety control in production site,
25
or equivalence agreement, shall be perfdormed by the Minister of
Agriculture in the case of 3 (three) times of:
a. non-compliance in PSAT identity inspection, as referred to in
Article 13 paragraph (3) sub-paragraph a; or
b. result of laboratory test, as referred to in Article 18
paragraph (1), shows that chemical contaminants and biological
contaminants exceed the maximum limit and/or containing
prohibited chemical substances as referred to in Article 4
paragraph (3).
Article 21
(1)Re-recognition of food safety control system on PSAT type of
a country, PSAT safety control system in production site,
equivalence agreement, or the frozen one, as referred to in
Article 20, can be granted by the Minister after performance
of review and re-verification in country of origin.
(2)In performing review and verification, as referred to in
paragraph (1), the Minister shall be assisted by a Team.
(3)The Team, as referred to in paragraph (2), shall be
established by a separate Decree.
Article 22
26
Concerning import of PSAT originating from a country or
production site whose recognition is frozen, as referred to in
Article 20, provisions on procedure of PSAT import, as referred
to in Articles 7 to 12, shall be applied.
CHAPTER V
PSAT EXPORT
Article 23
(1)PSAT export shall be in accordance with regulations on PSAT
safety of destination country, if required.
(2)PSAT export, as referred to in paragraph (1), from Indonesian
territory:
a. shall be completed with certificate or document stating
about condition of PSAT safety in accordance with
requirements of destination country issued by an accredited
laboratory, accredited certification institution, or PSAT
safety competent authority;
b. shall pass through the designated places of exit; and
c. shall be reported to Plant Quarantine Officer.
(3)Plant Quarantine Officer at place of exit shall perform
inspection of completeness and correctness of the documents
27
required by destination country as referred to in paragraphs
(1) and (2).
(4)If result of inspection shows fulfillment of the requirement,
as referred to in paragraph (3), PSAT can be delivered to
destination country.
CHAPTER VI
TRANSITORY PROVISIONS
Article 24
(1)Concerning PSAT which has been loaded to transportation
vehicle in country of origin within not later than 30 (thirty)
days since the application of this Regulation, PSAT safety
control shall be performed based on the provisions of
Regulation of Minister of Agriculture No.
27/Permentan/PP.340/5/2009 juncto Regulation of Minister of
Agriculture No. 38/Permentan/PP.340/8/2009.
(2)Existing recognition of PSAT safety control system shall be
valid until its expiry date.
CHAPTER VII
CLOSING PROVISIONS
28
Article 25
Implementation of safety control over PSAT import and export
shall be done integrally with the implementation of plant
quarantine action.
Article 26
With the enactment of this Regulation, Regulation of Minister of
Agriculture No. 27/Permentan/PP.340/5/2009 juncto Regulation of
Minister of Agriculture No. 38/Permentan/PP.340/8/2009 is
revoked and declared inapplicable.
Article 27
This Regulation shall be effective 3 (three) months since date
of enactment.
For public cognizance, this Regulation is enacted by placing it
in the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.
Stipulated in Jakarta
December 14, 2011
MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
Sgd
SUSWONO
Enacted in Jakarta
Date:
MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS
OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
29
AMIR SYAMSUDDIN
STATE GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA OF 2011 NO.
ATTACHMENT I OF REGULATION OF MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
NO: 88/Permentan/PP.340/12/2011
DATED: December 14, 2011
FRESH FOOD OF PLANT ORIGIN (PSAT), MAXIMUM LIMIT OF CHEMICAL
CONTAMINANT, BIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANT, AND PROHIBITED CHEMICAL
In the separate file
ATTACHMENT II OF REGULATION OF MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
NO: 88/Permentan/PP.340/12/2011
DATED: December 14, 2011
PROCEDURE OF RECOGNITION OF PSAT SAFETY CONTROL SYSTEM OF
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN, RECOGNITION OF PSAT SAFETY CONTROL SYSTEM IN
A PRODUCTION SITE AND/OR EQUIVALENCE AGREEMENT ON PSAT SAFETY
CONTROL SYSTEM BETWEEN INDONESIA AND COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
A. PROCEDURE OF RECOGNITION OF PSAT SAFETY CONTROL SYSTEM OF
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
I. REQUIREMENT
Requirement of PSAT safety control system in a country so it
can be given recognition:
30
1. applying good agricultural practices (GAP) on the PSAT
type;
2. applying good handling practices (GHP) on the PSAT type.
II.PROCEDURE
The process of grant of recognition of PSAT safety control
system in a country shall follow the following procedure:
1. Application Submission
Application shall be submitted in writing by PSAT
producer/his proxy in a country to the Minister of
Agriculture through Agricultural Quarantine Agency by
filling out Form of Application for Recognition accompanied
with documents and information concerning safety control
system of PSAT type in a country.
2. Assessment
a. Assessment shall be performed on the application
submitted.
b. Assessment shall be performed by a Team appointed by the
Minister of Agriculture.
c. If the application, document and information, as
referred to in point 1, have been received, the Team shall
31
perform assessment within not later than 3 (three) months
since receipt of application.
d. If the documents and information as referred to in point
1 are incomplete and/or during assessment process it is
found that the documents are incomplete, the applicant
shall be given an opportunity to complete it within not
later than 3 (three) months since letter of notification on
document incompletion to the applicant.
e. If the document is not completed, the application for
recognition shall be deemed null and void, and if the
applicant wanted to continue with process of application
for recognition, he is required to re-submit application
for recognition.
f. Result of assessment will be followed-up with on-site
verification on the production site.
3. On-Site Verification
a. Verification shall be performed by a Team appointed by
the Minister of Agriculture.
b. Before performance of verification, the Team shall
arrange planning that includes place and time of
performance of verification and other matters concerning
32
performance of verification and will be first discussed
with the applicant or his proxy.
c. The Team shall perform verification to country of origin
to evaluate compliance between
regulation/document/information given by the applicant with
food safety control system practices performed on PSAT type
in country of origin to be requested for recognition.
d. Result of on-site verification shall be written on a
work document.
e. The work document shall record result of verification
consisting of:
- elements of PSAT safety control system;
- non-compliance with authentic proofs on documentation and
facts.
f. Based on the work document, as referred to in letter e,
the Team shall arrange Report on Verification Result.
4. Evaluation
a. Verification result shall be reported by Chairman of
the Team to the Minister of Agriculture in Agricultural
Ministry meeting.
33
b. Submission of report, as referred to in letter a, is
intended to obtain assessment on Report on Verification
Result.
c. Assessment on Report on Verification Result shall be
contained in Verification Report Evaluation.
d. Verification Report Evaluation shall have been
implemented within not later than 3 (three) months since
completion of On-Site Verification activity.
e. On-Site Verification Evaluation shall be followed-up
with discussion at Team level within not later than 6 (six)
months since presentation of Report on Verification Result.
f. Result of discussion at Team level shall be conveyed in
writing to the applicant.
g. If the result, as referred to in letter f, shows non-
compliance of PSAT safety control system in production site
requested for recognition with Indonesia’s PSAT safety
requirement, the applicant is advised to perform corrective
action.
h. If the applicant has performed corrective action, the
process of grant of recognition can be followed-up with
further on-site verification.
34
i. Further verification shall be performed on non-
compliances found in the previous verification.
j. If the result, as referred to in letter i, is considered
in accordance with Indonesia’s PSAT safety requirement,
process of grant of recognition shall be followed up with
Stipulation of Recognition.
5. Recognition
a. Recognition shall be stipulated by the Minister of
Agriculture in the form of a Decree within not later than 6
(six) months since performance of Verification Report
Evaluation.
b. The Recognition, as referred to in letter a, shall be
valid for a period of 2 (two) years.
c. Extension of validity period of the Recognition, as
referred to in letter b, can be given after producer/his
proxy re-submits application for recognition and will be
followed-up with assessment and repeat verification.
III.SCOPE OF RECOGNITION
Types of commodity that can obtain recognition are PSAT type
produced by a country which has been granted recognition.
35
IV. APPLICATION FORM OF RECOGNITION
Sample of application form of recognition as mentioned in Part
II point 1 is as follow:
APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF FFPO IN A COUNTRY
In the separate file
B. PROCEDURE OF GRANT OF RECOGNITION OF PSAT SAFETY CONTROL
SYSTEM IN A PRODUCTION SITE
I. REQUIREMENT
PSAT safety control system requirement in a production site in
a country so it can be given recognition:
1. Applying good agricultural practices (GAP) in production
site.
2. Applying good handling practices in production site.
3. Being a registered and certified production site.
II.PROCEDURE
Process of grant of recognition of PSAT safety control system
in a production site shall follow the following procedure:
36
1. Application Submission
Application is submitted in writing by PSAT producer/his
proxy in a production site to the Minister of Agriculture
through Agricultural Quarantine Agency by filling out Form
of Application for Recognition accompanied with documents
and information concerning safety control system of PSAT
type in a production site.
2. Assessment
a. Assessment shall be performed on submitted application.
b. Assessment shall be performed by a Team appointed by the
Minister of Agriculture.
c. If the application, document, and information, as
referred to in point 1, have been received, the Team shall
perform assessment within not later than 3 (three) months
since receipt of application.
d. If the documents and information as referred to in point
1 are incomplete and/or during assessment process it is
found that the documents are incomplete, the applicant is
given an opportunity to complete it within not later than 3
(three) months since letter of notification on document
incompletion to the applicant.
37
e. If the document is not completed, the application for
recognition shall be deemed null and void, and if the
applicant wishes to continue with process of application
for recognition, he is required to re-submit application
for recognition.
f. Result of assessment will be followed-up with on-site
verification on the production site.
3. On-Site Verification
a. Verification shall be performed by a Team appointed by
the Minister of Agriculture.
b. Before performance of verification, the Team shall
arrange planning consisting of place and time of
performance of verification and other matters concerning
performance of verification and will be first discussed
with the applicant or his proxy.
c. The Team shall perform verification in production site
to evaluate compliance of regulation/document/information
given by the applicant with food safety control system
practices performed on PSAT type in production site to be
requested for recognition.
38
d. Result of on-site verification shall be written on a
work document.
e. The work document shall record result of verification
consisting of:
- elements of PSAT safety control system;
- non-compliance with authentic proofs on documentation and
facts.
f. Based on the work document, as referred to in letter e,
the Team shall arrange Report on Verification Result.
4. Evaluation
a. Verification result shall be reported by Chairman of
the Team in meeting of Agricultural Quarantine Agency and
the related institutions.
b. Submission of report, as referred to in letter a, is
intended to obtain assessment on Report on Verification
Result.
c. Assessment on Report on Verification Result shall be
contained in Verification Report Evaluation.
39
d. Verification Report Evaluation shall have been
implemented within not later than 3 (three) months since
completion of On-Site Verification activity.
e. On-Site Verification Evaluation shall be followed-up
with discussion at Technical Commission level within not
later than 6 (six) months since presentation of Report on
Verification Result.
f. Result of discussion at Team level shall be conveyed in
writing to the applicant.
g. If the result, as referred to in letter f, shows non-
compliance of PSAT safety control system in production site
requested for recognition with Indonesia’s PSAT safety
requirement, the applicant is advised to perform corrective
action.
h. If the applicant has performed corrective action,
process of grant of recognition can be followed-up with
further on-site verification.
i. Further verification shall be performed on non-
compliances found in the previous verification.
j. If the result, as referred to in letter i, is considered
in accordance with Indonesia’s PSAT safety requirement,
40
process of grant of recognition shall be followed up with
Stipulation of Recognition.
5. Recognition
a. Recognition shall be stipulated by the Minister of
Agriculture in the form of a Decree within not later than 6
(six) months since performance of Verification Report
Evaluation.
b. The Recognition, as referred to in letter a, shall be
valid for a period of 2 (two) years.
c. Extension of validity period of the Recognition, as
referred to in letter b, can be given after producer/his
proxy re-submits application for recognition and will be
followed-up with assessment and repeat verification.
III.SCOPE OF RECOGNITION
Types of commodity that can obtain recognition are PSAT type
produced by a production site which has been granted
recognition.
IV. APPLICATION FORM OF RECOGNITION
Sample of application form of recognition as mentioned in Part
II point 1 is as follow:
41
APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION OF PRODUCTION SITE
In the separate file
C. PROCEDURE OF EQUIVALENCE AGREEMENT ON PSAT SAFETY CONTROL
SYSTEM BETWEEN INDONESIA AND COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
I. REQUIREMENT
Requirement of equivalence agreement on PSAT safety control
system between Indonesia and country of origin:
1. Being an initiative of two or more countries that have PSAT
trade relations with Indonesia;
2. Both countries have Food Safety Competent Authority who
prepares/submits information, gives opportunity for
verification performance on PSAT safety control system
II.PROCEDURE
Process of preparation of equivalence agreement on PSAT safety
control system is as follows:
1. Application shall be submitted in writing by Food Safety
Competent Authority of a country who will apply for
equivalence agreement to the Minister of Agriculture
through Head of Agricultural Quarantine Agency by filling
out Form of Application for Equivalence Agreement
42
accompanied with documents and information concerning
safety control system of the PSAT type.
2. The Minister of Agriculture shall form an Assessment and
Verification Team on PSAT Safety Control System to assess
preparedness of Indonesia’s PSAT safety control system and
its scope which will be set forth in equivalence agreement
and to perform verification on PSAT safety control system
in exporting country.
3. The Minister of Agriculture shall give an opportunity to
Food Safety Competent Authority of country of origin to
cooperate in preparing and following up and process of
consultation and negotiation of conditions in PSAT safety
control system of each country.
4. Equivalence agreement can be stipulated if both parties
objectively accept different sanitary actions/conditions in
PSAT safety control system of each country, but achieving
appropriate level of protection (ALOP).
5. Stipulation of equivalence agreement on sanitary
actions/conditions in the framework of inspection and
certification shall be based on the following principles:
a. Both parties are entitled to stipulate ALOP in each
country;
43
b. Sanitary conditions in the stipulation of equivalence
agreement shall not be discriminative to WTO member
countries and shall not create hidden barriers to
international trade.
c. Both parties may recognize different sanitary
actions/conditions but achieving ALOP.
d. Country of origin shall be responsible to objectively
show that the sanitary actions applied by the country
concerned have achieved ALOP of importing country.
e. Upon demand of country of origin or importing country
or both, consultation and negotiation shall be performed to
determine equivalence of sanitary actions applied by both
countries within a rational time.
f. Evaluation shall be conducted objectively on sanitary
actions performed in both countries.
g. Risk analysis in stipulation of equivalence agreement,
each country shall be consistent in using internationally
accepted technique and methodology.
h. In determining equivalence, the importing country in
accordance with its knowledge and experience, will review,
44
assess, and evaluate PSAT inspection and certification in
country of origin.
i. Country of origin shall give access, upon demand of the
importing country, to review, assess, and evaluate its PSAT
inspection and certification system.
j. Stipulation of equivalence agreement shall consider
methods to maintain sustainability in the implementation
thereof.
k. Countries who arrange agreement shall ensure
transparency in consultation and negotiation in the
stipulation of equivalence agreement.
l. Equivalence agreement can be made by two or more
countries.
III.SCOPE OF RECOGNITION
1. Equivalence agreement on PSAT safety control system
consists of, amongst others, work frame, legislation,
control and procedure, inspection and certification
services, legislation enforcement, laboratory services,
place of production/packaging, and information exchange.
45
2. Equivalence agreement shall cover review procedure and
regular perfection to settle differences arising in the
framework of equivalence agreement.
III.CONTENT OF EQUIVALENCE AGREEMENT
Equivalence agreement shall at least contain information
concerning the following matters:
a. type of agreement (bilateral or multilateral);
b. title of agreement;
c. parties engaged in agreement;
d. objective of agreement;
e. scope of agreement;
f. definition of terms;
g. substance of obligations;
h. competent authority responsible for agreement;
i. equivalence findings;
j. provisions on assessment/verification;
k. sample collecting;
l. methodology, analysis, and other methodology;
m. administrative procedure;
n. information exchange and cooperation;
o. transparency;
p. notification;
46
q. dispute settlement;
r. liaison officer;
s. effective date;
t. review, modification, and termination; and
u. signature.
E. PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING EQUIVALENCE
1. Importing country shall provide detailed information
concerning sanitary conditions applied, upon demand of country
of origin (exporter).
2. Country of origin shall review all sanitary conditions
applied by importing country to identify sanitary actions
required in the framework of equivalence agreement.
3. Both countries shall perform exchange of information,
especially concerning matters required for equivalence
agreement.
F. EQUIVALENCE DECISION
1. Equivalence decision of importing country shall be based on
transparent, objective, and consistent analysis process and
shall incorporate consultation with all related parties.
47
2. Equivalence decision of importing country on sanitary
actions shall consider:
a. experience, knowledge, and confidence on food inspection
and certification system of country of origin;
b. supporting data submitted by country of origin;
c. analysis on sanitary actions of country of origin, and
objective achievement of ALOP;
d. the parameter shall be stated as far as it is possible
quantitatively;
e. diversity and source of uncertainty of other data;
f. identified benefit for human health which is expected of a
sanitary action in exporting country;
g. Codex rules concerning food safety.
3. Exporting and importing countries should immediately notify
about changes in program and recommendation that may affect
equivalence decision.
Procedure for determining and equivalence decision shall
basically be in accordance with CAC/GL 53-2003 and CAC/GL 34-
1999.
48
V. APPLICATION FORM OF EQUIVALENCE AGREEMENT
Sample of application form of recognition as mentioned in Part
II point 1 is as follow:
APPLICATION FOR EQUIVALENCE AGGREEMENT OF FFPO
In the separate file
ATTACHEMENT III OF REGULATION OF MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
NO: 88/Permentan/PP.340/12/2011
DATED: December 14, 2011
REMARK ON PSAT (PRIOR NOTICE)
In the separate file
ATTACHMENT IV OF REGULATION OF MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
NO: 88/Permentan/PP.340/12/2011
DATED: December 14, 2011
SAMPLING PROCEDURE FOR LABORATORY TEST
A. SAMPLING PROCEDURE FOR LABORATORY TEST
Plant Quarantine Officer at place of entry shall collect
samples and shall pack test samples in such a way so they will
not experience damage/degradation during shipment. Afterwards,
the test samples shall be handed to PSAT safety test
laboratory.
49
1. Sampling shall be performed by Plant Quarantine Office who
already received sampling training.
2. In performing sampling, Plant Quarantine Officer shall fill
out Sampling Report in accordance with the format in Form 1
Sampling Report and attach it to the Letter of Application
for Laboratory Test from Head of Agricultural Quarantine
Technical Operating Unit (UPT) concerned and hand it to
PSAT safety test laboratory chosen by the owner or proxy as
specified in Form 2 together with PSAT samples to be
tested.
3. The Letter of Application for Laboratory Test shall mention
test parameter expected, for example: for pesticide residue
test, type of pesticide’s active material to be tested must
be mentioned. Format of Letter of Application for
Laboratory Test is as specified in Form 3.
4. PSAT sample to be sent to the test laboratory shall be
packed by Sampling Officer (PPC) in accordance with
expected requirement for PSAT safety test.
5. PSAT samples can be delivered personally by Plant
Quarantine Officer to PSAT safety test laboratory or
through courier service or by coordination with PST safety
test laboratory.
6. The PSAT safety test laboratory shall perform test in
accordance with the expected test parameter such as the one
50
in Form 3 within not later than 1 (one) working day since
receipt of PSAT samples.
7. The test laboratory shall submit report on test result to
Agricultural Quarantine UPT who submitted test application
within not later than 1 (one) working day since completion
of test.
8. Plant Quarantine Officer shall inspect test result on
chemical contaminants in PSAT tested with maximum limit of
contaminants stipulated and contained in Report on
Performance/Control Result*) Physical/Health Examination of
Carrier/Identity Inspection and PSAT Safety Test (DP-7)
within not later than 1 (one) working days since receipt of
test result.
B. SAMPLING
1. SAMPLING METHOD
There are two (2) sampling methods, namely lottery and car
methods. Lottery method is used to select samples from the
population which is in packed form, while car method is used
to select samples from the population which is in bulk form.
1.1. Lottery Method
1.1.1. Using Slips of Paper
51
1. If we have lot of items consisting 36 boxes and wish to
take 6 boxes as samples.
2. Prepare paper slips with a size equal to lot size. Give
numbers according to lot size (N), in this case 1 to 36.
3. Place the paper slips in a box.
4. Shake the box.
5. Take a paper slip and write down the number on the slip.
6. Put the slip back to into the box, shake the box again, and
repeat this procedure until there are 6 different numbers
selected.
This method is called random as each number has an equal
chance of being selected, provided that after number picking,
the slips must be placed back into the box.
1.1.2. Using Random Table
1. If the lot size is equal to 300 boxes and 20 boxes are
taken as samples.
2. Each pack or unit shall be given sequence number, for
example 1, 2, 3, etc. …300.
52
3. As number of packs consists of 3 digits (200), a random
number is required consisting of a sequence of 3 random
numbers and 3 random columns selected, for each pack to be
taken as samples.
4. To determine starting point, point randomly (for example by
a pencil) a number on the first page of the random table
(Table 6), in this case for example pointing at line 48 column
10. On line 48, write down 4 numbers starting from column 10
to the right (columns 10, 11, 12, 13), namely 3203. The first
two numbers for line number and the following two numbers for
column number of starting point. As starting point, line 32
and column 3 are selected.
5. Write down 3 numbers each starting from the starting point
to the right direction until 20 pairs of numbers are obtained.
Number 592 is obtained, and it is greater than 300 so it is
not used. And, numbers which are not greater than 300 are:
126, 236, 163, 189, 278. As there are only 2 numbers left,
reading is continued to the next line (line 33) and to make it
easy, take the left direction, numbers 70, 210, etc until 20
different pairs of numbers are obtained. Units whose numbers
are picked are selected as samples.
I.2. Car Method
53
Random sampling can also be performed on bulk products in form
of grains which are commonly carried in container or in ship’s
hold and shall be collected by using a special device. Car
sampling method diagram can be seen in Figure 1.
Samples taken from a car shall consist of at least 5 probes
taken from the following points:
a. Middle point of a ship’s hold.
b. 1 – 1.5 cm from rear door/wall of the ship’s hold and 0.5
to the inside of one of the ship’s hold side.
c. 1 – 1.5 m from the same point of the ship’s hold, but 0.5 m
from the opposite side, such as in collection of samples
(2) and (5) such as in collection of samples (2) and (3),
but from opposite point and side of ship’s hold.
0.5 m from side 0.5 m from side
O O 1 – 1.5m from rear point
Door O
middle
1 – 1.5 m from door O O
0.5 m from side 0.5 m from side
Figure 1. Car sampling diagram
This method can also be applied on packed products, if
sampling is performed directly in the car, commonly in the
port or on inter-country border.
54
2. PSAT SAMPLING PROCEDURE
2.1.Preparation of Sampling Kits and Equipment
Sampling kits and equipment required for sample collection
that shall be prepared consist of:
- sampling kits (for example, gloves, shovel, double-headed
spear, single-headed spear, vacuum, etc.)
- sample containers (for example, plastic bags, aluminum foil
bags)
- shipping tools (refrigerated containers, frozen containers)
- identification kits (for example, label, marker pen,
ballpoint pen, glue)
2.2. Sampling Procedure
PSAT package is divided into 3 (three) types, namely bulk
package, large package (sack/large container), and small
package (commonly of less than 5 kg per primary package).
Sampling system for the three package types is different.
Total samples for each type of package are as specified in
Table 1.
2.2.1. Bulk Package Sampling
55
Sampling of PSAT whose package is in form of bulk shall be in
accordance with the procedure based on SNI’s Solid Sampling.
And, sampling points shall be determined based on random
sampling car method. Sampling procedure is as follows:
1. Collect samples from a car consisting of at least 5 (five)
probes.
2. From On each point, at least 1 kg or 5 units are taken.
3. All samples are mixed and collected according to Table 1.
4. Separate samples for each different test by special
handling, depending on the type of test to be performed.
2.2.2. Large Package Sampling
Sampling of PSAT with large package shall be in accordance
with the procedure based on SNI’s Solid Sampling. Sampling
points (containers to be used as samples) shall be determined
based on random sampling, whether lottery method by using
paper slips or Random Table (Table 6).
2.2.3. Small Package Sampling
2.2.3.1. Product without Secondary Package
Sampling procedure to determine status of acceptance or
rejection commonly refers to Codex AQL 65. If Codex procedure
is adopted it becomes very expensive as all samples must be
56
tested one by one to determine status of acceptance or
rejection. But, if test could be done fastly, Codex AQL 6.5
method can be fully implemented.
Sampling procedure shall be in accordance with Codex (Table 5.
Sampling Plan I). Sampling point shall be determined based on
Car Method. For example, there is a lot with total packages of
6,000 units, each package has a weight of 3 kg. So, the
sampling procedure is as follows:
1. Take 13 packages (see Table 5) from position in accordance
with Car Method.
2. Open the packages, take at least 1 kg (at least 5 units)
from each package.
3. All samples shall be mixed and collected in accordance with
Table 1.
4. Separate samples for each different test type by special
handling, depending on the test type to be performed.
5. Unused samples shall be returned.
2.2.3.2. Product with Secondary Package
Sampling procedure is a combination of SNI’s Solid Sampling
and Codex AQL 65. For example, there is a lot with total
secondary packages of 300 containers. Each container contains
57
20 primary packages (total primary package is 6000 units),
each package has a weight of 3 kg.
Based on SNI (see Table 3 and 4), total primary samples that
must be collected are 200 packages from 20 containers (10
primary packages are taken from each container). While, in
accordance with Codex AQL 65, total samples that must be
collected are 13 units. So, the sampling procedure is as
follows:
1. Pick 20 containers by Random Method.
2. Open the containers and take 10 packages from each
container.
3. 200 packages are mixed and 13 packages are picked by Random
Method.
4. Take 1 kg (at least 5 units) from each package.
5. All samples shall be mixed and collected in accordance with
Table 1.
6. Separate samples for each different test type by special
handling, depending on the test type to be performed.
7. Unused samples shall be returned.
2.3. Sample Identification
58
1. Attach label to sample container after samples have been
taken. Stick label properly to prevent it from detaching
during handling or transportation.
2. Number each sample container or write down code of samples
on the label. The code is intended so that sample identity is
unknown by the test laboratory. The code on the label shall be
similar to the one on the report.
3. If sample unit is taken from large package such as
cardboard box, write down cardboard box identity on the sample
label to give a chance for re-test of the sample concerned.
4. Label could be in the form of sticky paper or other
material whose content is unalterable without damaging it.
Write down label identity with date, sample number, and person
collecting the sample. If more than one sample are expected,
each unit of samples shall be treated equally.
2.4. Reporting
After collection and shipment of samples, a sampling report
shall be made by using Form 1.
Form 1.
LETTER HEAD OF LOCAL TECHNICAL OPERATING UNIT (UPT)
59
Officer’s Name: -filled in with name of Plant Quarantine Officer
who has received Sampling Training who performs PSAT sampling
Officer Registration Number: - fill in with registration number
of Sampling Officer (if already registered)-
If the Sampling Officer is not yet registered, this field is not
necessarilly filled.
Sampling No: - fill in according to UPT’s administrative records
Name of Requesting Company: - fill in with name of company
(importer/exporter) being owner of PSAT whose sample is taken
Address: - fill in with address of the above company
Name of Test Laboratory: - fill in with name of destination
laboratory to test PSAT safety
Address: - fill in with address of the foregoing laboratory
Sample Identification: - this field is not necessarily filled
Sampling date: - fill in with date of performance of PSAT
sampling
Name of sample/code: - fill in with name of PSAT whose sample is
taken-
-Can be completed with code, if necessary
Objective of sampling: - fill in with objective of sampling, for
example “for PSAT safety test on pesticide residue/mycotoxin,
heavy metal”-
- This field is filled in in accordance with target of test to
60
be performed-
Sample condition: -fill in with actual condition of samples
during sampling, for example: “good” or “spoiled” or “damaged”
Product temperature during sampling: - fill in with product
temperature based on result of measurement of product
temperature-
-This field is filled in if during sampling, measurement of
product temperature is performed
Total samples: - fill in with total samples collected
Sampling location: - fill in with name of sampling location, for
example: “warehouse…”
Sample package: - fill in with type of package used to wrap the
samples collected
Idenity of transport vehicle: -fill in with name of transport
vehicle (name of aircraft, ship, etc.) and flight or shipping
number
Sampling method: - fill in with sampling method performed – in
accordance with PSAT Sampling Guidelines
Notes on Sampling: -fill in with other necessary information
concerning sampling, amongst others, sample storage, shipment,
etc.
Sampling Officer:
-signature of sampling
Samples recipient:
-signature of administrative
61
officer-
(…………………………………………)
officer of destination
laboratory-
(…………………………………………)
Form 2.
FORM OF APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PSAT TEST LABORATORY
Place, date/month/year
I the undersigned as PSAT owner/proxy*):
Name: _____________
Address: ______________
Company’s Name: __________
hereby submits application fopr PSAT Laboratory Test to:
O 1. Center for Quality Testing and Agricultural and Forestry
Product Certification (BPMSHPHH)
O 2. Center for Fisheries Development and Control (BBPPHP),
Ministry of Marine and Fisheries
O 3. National Drug & Food Testing Center of Drug & Food Control
Agency
O 4. Center for Plant Product Quality Testing, Directorate
General of Food Crops
O 5. Agro Chemical Laboratory Installation, Food Crop and
Horticulture Protection Agency (BPTPH) of West Java
O 6. BPTPH of North Sumatera
62
O 7. BPTPH of West Sumatera
O 8. Regional Health Laboratory of Lampung Province
O 9. BPTPH of Surabaya
O 10.Center for Drug and Food Control (BBPOM) of Denpasar
O 11 BPTPH of Maros
O 12 BBPOM of Makassar
O 13 ………………………. (accredited laboratory)
(Put a check mark (V) on selected laboratory)
*) delete the unnecessary
Form 3.
LETTER HEAD OF LOCAL UPT
Place, date/month/year
No:
Attachment: 1 page (please attach Sampling Report)
To:
Head of Laboratory …
in …
The undersigned:
Name: (fill in with name of Head of UPT or his authorized
officer)
Occupation: (fill in with occupation accordingly)
Institution: (fill in with name of institution/UPT)
63
Address: (fill in with address of institution/UPT completely and
clearly)
Phone/Fax: (fill in with phone and fax numbers)
hereby submits application for testing of fresh food of plant
origin owned by … address: … as follows:
No Commodity Quantity Package Condition Test Parameter Method Remark
-mention test
parameter
expected-
Please be informed accordingly. Thank you for your attention and
cooperation.
(……………………………………………)
Employee Registration No:
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Plant products; description of primary samples and
minimum number of laboratory samples
No Commodity
Classification
Commodity
Sample
Primary
Sample
Collected
Minimum
Number of
Laboratory
Samples
64
1 Fresh fruits and
vegetables
Fresh products of
small size
Units are commonly
less than 25 g
Berries
Peas
The entire
unit or
pack, or
units
collected
by sampling
equipment
1 kg
Fresh products of
medium size
Units are commonly
25 – 250 g
Apples
Oranges
Entire unit 1 kg (at
least 10
units)
Fresh products of
large size
Units are commonly
more than 250 g
Cabbage
Cucumber
Entire unit 2 kg (at
least 5
units)
2 Grains Soybean 1 kg
Paddy 1 kg
Wheat 1 kg
Peanuts 0.5 kg
Note:
For grain product, by using the equipment as specified in SNI
(Figure 1), around 100 gr is taken from each sack.
65
Table 2. Number of samples to be collected (SNI on Solid
Sampling)
Number of samples per lot
Sack/container
Number of samples collected
Sack/container
Up to 10 All samples
11 – 25 5
26 – 50 7
51 – 100 10
> 100 A quadrate of total samples
Note: If number of samples per lot is up to 5 sacks/container,
all of them shall be taken, if number of samples is 6 – 25, 5
samples shall be taken.
Table 3. Number of small packages to be collected from the
existing number
Number of small packages Number of small packages for
samples
10,000 200
20,000 250
40,000 300
60,000 350
>100,000 400
66
Note: If number of small packages is between the numbers
specified in the Table, total samples taken shall be in
accordance with the aforementioned number.
Table 4. Number of small packages collected for each cardboard
box
Number of small packages in
cardboard box
Maximum number of small
packages taken from each
cardboard box
>24 15
12 – 24 10
<12 All small packages in the box
Number of cradboard boxes opened are determined by X/Y formula.
X is number from Table 3
Y is from Table 4.
Table 5. SAMPLING PLAN 1 (Inspection Level I, AQL=6.5)
a. Net weight equal to or less than 1 kg (2.2 LB)
Number of Lot (N) Number of Samples (n)
4,800 or less 6
4,801 – ,000 13
24,001 – 48,000 21
48,001 – 84,000 29
67
84,001 – 144,000 48
144,001 – 240,000 84
More than 240,000 126
b. Net weight more than 1 KG (2.2 LB) but not more than 4.5 kg
(10 LB)
Number of Lot (N) Number of Samples (n)
2,400 or less 6
2,401 – 15,000 13
15,001 – 24,000 21
24,001 – 84,000 29
84,001 – 144,000 48
144,001 – 240,000 84
More than 240,000 126
Table 6. Random Table
In the separate file
ATTACHMENT V. OF REGULATION OF MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
NO: 88/Permentan/PP.340/12/2011
DATED: December 14, 2011
LABORATORY TEST FOR PSAT SAFETY
In the separate file
68
ATTACHMENT VI OF REGULATION OF MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
NO: 88/Permentan/PP.340/12/2011
DATED: December 14, 2011
FOOD SAFETY SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE ON IMPORT OF FRESH FOOD OF
PLANT ORIGIN AT PORT OF ENTRY
I. SCOPE OF SURVEILLANCE COVERS PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, AND
REPORTING OF SURVEILLANCE RESULT
A. PSAT safety surveillance shall be performed on import of
PSAT from recognized country or production site or country who
has an equivalence agreement. Surveillance is to identity
content of chemical contaminants (pesticide residue,
mycotoxin, and/or heavy metal) in PSAT.
B. Surveillance shall be performed by Agricultural Quarantine
UPT.
II.SURVEILLANCE PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, AND REPORTING
A. Surveillance Planning
1. To implement surveillance, Agricultural Quarantine UPT
shall propose surveillance plan to Agricultural
Quarantine Agency.
69
2. Surveillance plan proposal shall be arranged based on
considerations of, amongst others:
a. PSAT type;
b. Country of origin or production site;
c. PSAT producer/exporter in country of origin;
d. Period of time of PSAT import; and
e. Frequency of PSAT import.
3. Consideration of surveillance plan shall use availability
of data and information on PSAT import of the previous
period of time.
4. The surveillance plan proposal, as referred to in point
1, shall at least stipulate:
a. Sampling time pattern;
b. Performer;
c. PSAT type, country of origin, and production site
which becomes target of surveillance; and
d. Cost.
5. Surveillance plan proposal shall be submitted by
Agricultural Quarantine UPT to Agricultural Quarantine
Agency to get approval.
6. Agricultural Quarantine Agency jointly with Agricultural
Quarantine UPT shall discuss surveillance plan proposal
70
to determine surveillance plan of each Agricultural
Quarantine UPT.
7. Surveillance Plan shall be at least 3 times in a year or
recognition period or equivalence agreement and shall be
stipulated by the end of January each year or the
beginning of application of recognition of a country or
production site or equivalence agreement of a country.
B. Implementation of Surveillance
1. Surveillance stages consist of sampling, shipment of PSAT
samples to test laboratory, and PSAT safety test at test
laboratory.
2. Sampling shall be performed at any time and shall be
determined by Agricultural Quarantine UPT.
3. Sampling shall be performed by Sampling Officer during
PSAT identity inspection.
4. In case that sampling could not be performed by Sampling
Officer, sampling could be performed by Plant Quarantine
Officer who has attended PSAT sampling training.
5. Procedure of sampling and sample shipment shall be
stipulated by Head of Agricultural Quarantine Agency.
6. PSAT safety test shall be performed by an accredited or
appointed test laboratory.
71
7. Result of PSAT safety test is final and confirmation test
may not be performed.
8. Test result showing contaminant level exceeding the
maximum limit of contaminant required shall be followed
with rejection of the entire unit of PSAT consignment and
submission of notification of non-compliance (NNC) to
PSAT Competent Authority of country of origin.
9. Concerning PSAT which contains contaminant exceeding the
maximum limit stipulated by a country in the preliminary
surveillance, surveillance shall be performed
consecutively on the following shipment.
C. Surveillance Reporting
1. Agricultural Quarantine UPT shall report surveillance
result to Agricultural Quarantine Agency.
2. Reporting shall be done every time after completion of
performance of surveillance.
3. Report on surveillance result, as referred to in point 1,
shall incorporate information concerning, amongst others:
a. surveillance performer;
b. time of implementation of surveillance;
c. test laboratory;
d. country of origin or production site of PSAT;
72
e. PSAT producer/exporter in country of origin;
f. PSAT type;
g. test result on chemical contaminants (pesticide
residue, mycotoxin, and/or heavy metal); and hazardous
chemical substances;
h. Summary of surveillance result.
D. Evaluation
1. Report shall be evaluated by Agricultural Quarantine
Agency to determine compliance of the country or
production site in fulfillment of PSAT safety
requirement.
2. Evaluation shall be performed on all reports submitted by
Agricultural Quarantine UPT.
3. Compliance is shown by the country’s or production site’s
fulfillment of PSAT safety requirement in the form of
content of chemical contaminants (pesticide residue,
mycotoxin, and/or heavy metal) not exceeding the maximum
limit stipulated and not containing hazardous chemical
substances.
4. Result of evaluation can be used as reference in
implementation of PSAT safety surveillance of the
following year and shall become reference concerning
level of PSAT safety.
73
E. Freezing
1. In case that the PSAT from the same country or production
site, within recognition period, 3 (three) times of non-
compliances are identified in the form of content of
chemical contaminants (pesticide residue, mycotoxin,
and/or heavy metal) exceeding the maximum limit and/or
containing hazardous chemical substances, freezing shall
be performed.
2. Three times of non-compliance is the accumulation of
result of surveillance performed by Agricultural
Quarantine UPT.
3. Non-compliance of surveillance result on PSAT type
originating from one unit of consignment shall not be
accumulated.
4. Application of freezing shall be done on PSAT of a
country or production site of PSAT.
F. Test Laboratory
To be appointed as a test laboratory, a laboratory shall
meet requirements, amongst others:
a. having the ability to perform test on chemical
contaminants (pesticide residue, mycotoxin, and/or heavy
metal);
74
b. having the equipment and material to perform test in
accordance with standard methods;
c. having sufficient number of competent analysts;
d. at least not being in the process of accreditation; and
e. being able to perform test within the test period in
accordance with requirement of Agricultural Quarantine
Agency.
2. Appointment of test laboratory will be revoked if the test
laboratory is proven to violate integrity and/or
professionalism.
MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE
sgd
SUSWONO