no3-6

Upload: karim-mohamed

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 no3-6

    1/4

    Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry

    Vol.1 No. 3, July- Oct 2012 133

    Custom made post & core used to correct malpositioned maxillary canine -

    A case report

    a1 2 3Ashish Kumar Srivastava , Ujjal Chatterjee , Madhu Ranjan

    Abstract:Maxillary Canine plays a major role in the esthetic component of an individual. Loss of Caninenot only compromises esthetics, but also limits the Prosthodontics option to replace this

    particular tooth. The presence of poor abutments mesial & distal to the Canine leaves us withthe option to use Implants or Removable Partial Denture. However Maxillary Canine whenmalpositioned can be corrected even if the patient disagrees with Orthodontic treatment due tothe time constrains & economic factors.

    Introduction:

    Malocclusion is a common problem in

    today's population. However the degree of

    severity varies from case to case.

    O r t h o d o n t i c - P r o s t h o d o n t i c s

    interrelationship is well documented. Certain

    factors will always indicate either of the two.

    The most common deciding factors amongothers are, the age of the patient, predictable

    time period for Orthodontic treatment, Loss

    of permanent tooth / teeth to make way for

    space. Custom post & core gives us the

    advantage to change the alignment of the

    long axis of the tooth & bring it to an

    acceptable position so as to give a pleasing

    e s t h e t i c a p p e a r a n c e & m a x i m u m

    preservation of natural tooth structure

    aCorresponding author: [email protected]

    1Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Hazaribagh

    College of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Hazaribagh2Professor & H.O.D. Department of Prosthodontics,

    Hazaribagh College of Dental Sciences & Hospital,

    Hazaribagh

    3Reader, Department of Prosthodontics Hazaribagh

    College of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Hazaribagh

    Case report:

    A 20 year old male reported with chief

    complains of poor esthetics as one of the

    upper front teeth was discolored, out of shape

    and alignment. History revealed a prior

    treatment of cheek laceration in left anterior

    region due to malpositioned canine which

    was treated by excessive coronal tooth

    reduction (Fig.1). This led to the tooth being

    non-vital. The patient wanted to correct his

    appearance, but was reluctant to Orthodontic

    treatment due to time factor. Co-relation of

    radiographic & clinical examination

    suggested endodontic treatment of 23.

    Custom made post & core followed by metal

    ceramic crown was planned.

    After evaluation of endodontic

    treatment, the tooth was prepared for post and

    core. The coronal tooth structure was

    modified with rotary instruments (Fig.2). For

    post space preparation, entire length of the

    obturated canal was measured & the apical 4-5 mm of gutta percha was left

  • 8/11/2019 no3-6

    2/4

    Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry

    Vol.1 No. 3, July- Oct 2012 134

    intact. The canal was prepared in an

    elliptical shape so as to prevent rotation of

    the Post. This was done by using rotatory

    instruments, specific files, Pesso reamers,

    or gates glidden drills, approximately the

    size of no. 90 file. The coronal end of the

    canal is funneled. Remaining coronal tooth

    structure was prepared to produce ferrule

    effect.

    Direct technique was used for

    making the pattern of the post and core. After

    lubrication of post space with thin layer of

    petrolatum jelly, impression was made using

    prefabricated acrylic post by sprinkle

    method. After checking the fit & lack of

    undercut in the post, core was made by

    adding some more acrylic on the coronal

    portion, which was then modified to the level

    of alignment required for correction of the

    position of the canine (Fig.3).

    The acrylic pattern was invested in

    conventional way & the casting done. The

    procured cast of post & core (Fig.4) was

    finished, polished and then checked in the

    mouth for fit, alignment, and any

    discrepancy. It was then cemented using type

    I glass ionomer cement. Using high speed

    rotary hand piece, the core was prepared for

    further alignment & smoothening (Fig.5). An

    elastomeric impression was made of the

    prepared tooth. Acrylic temporary crown

    was placed. Metal trial on subsequent visit

    was done & shade selected. The fabricated

    Metal ceramic crown was cemented using

    luting Glass Ionomer Cement (Fig.6).

    Discussion:

    Prior to treatment an evaluation of

    endodontic status, periodontal status,

    1,2,3

    restorability of the tooth must be made.

    The reinforcement of tooth is essential when

    selecting a post and core technique. The

    procedure should not weaken the tooth or

    risk of the loss of the endodontic seal.

    Excessive canal enlargement or apical

    extension that leaves less than 4-5 mm of

    4,5apical gutta percha should be avoided. The

    cast post and core maintains the integrity of

    the tooth with a cervical collar exhibiting the

    4,6,7,8,9ferrule effect. The preparation of the

    tooth should extend 2 mm beyond the

    cervical margin of the post and core. In direct

    technique to develop the pattern of the canalacrylic, plastic, tooth pick, nails, paper clips

    and so on have been reported. Careful

    consideration of occlusion and load transfer

    4,6,7,10,11,12,13has to be planned.

    A cast post and core may be indicated

    when a tooth is misaligned and the core must

    be angled in relation to the post to achieve

    proper alignment with the adjacent teeth.

    Perhaps the biggest disadvantage for cast

    post and cores is in areas that require an

    esthetic temporary restoration. Satisfactory

    result obtained both functionally &

    esthetically bought to forefront the benefits

    of cast post & core. It is a prolonged method

  • 8/11/2019 no3-6

    3/4

    Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry

    Vol.1 No. 3, July- Oct 2012 135

    Fig 1 Nonvital malpositioned 23 with

    excessive coronal tooth structure loss

    Fig 2 Gross Reduction of remaining

    coronal tooth structure & root canal

    preparation for post impression.

    Fig 3 Acrylic post & core placed in

    prepared root canal for final check of

    alignment

    Fig 4 Post & core obtained after

    casting

    Fig 5 Cast post & core cemented into

    prepared root canal

    Fig 6 Final restoration of PorcelainFused to Metal crown fixed on Canine.

  • 8/11/2019 no3-6

    4/4

    Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry

    Vol.1 No. 3, July- Oct 2012 136

    including additional laboratory & clinical4,8,12,13

    steps.

    Conclusion:

    Conventional custom post & core technique

    still is advantageous against newer materials

    in case of altering the alignment of tooth. Its

    disadvantages are high level of precision &

    occurrences of casting failure. Rigidity of

    metal & non parallel alignment to long axis

    of tooth can lead to fracture provided

    meticulous steps are taken to prevent

    occurrences of traumatic forces.

    References:1. Rosensteil S.F., Land M. F.,Fujimoto J.

    rdContempory Fixed Prosthodontics 4

    edition ch-12 pg 336.

    2. Malone W.F.P., Koth D.L., Cavozos E.

    Jr., Kaiser D.A. & Morgano S.M.

    Tylman's Theory and Practice of Fixedth n

    Prosthodontics. 8 ed pg no 407.th

    3. Cohen. Pathways of the pulp 8 edition;

    pg 765-793.

    4. Richard S. Schwartz and James W.

    Robb ins . Pos t P lacemen t and

    Restoration of Endodontically Treated

    Teeth: A Literature Review.

    Journal of

    endodontics: vol. 30, no. 5, May 2004;

    pg no 289-301.

    5. Marwan Abou-Rass. The restoration of

    endodontically treated teeth: New

    answers to an old problem. AO vol. 75,fall 1982; pg no. 68-97.

    6. Linards Grieznis, Peteris Apse, Una

    Soboleva. The effect of 2 different

    diameter cast posts on tooth root fracture

    resistance in vitro. Stomatologija, Baltic

    Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 8:30-

    2, 2006.

    7. Markus Balkenhol a, Bernd Wostmann a,

    Christian Rein b, Paul Ferger. Survivaltime of cast post and cores: A

    10 year retrospective study. Journal of

    dentistry 35 (2007) 5058.

    8. Guido Heydecke, Mathilde C. Peters.

    The restoration of endodontically

    treated, single rooted teeth with cast or

    direct posts and cores: A systemic

    review. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:380-6.

    9. N. R. Stankiewicz & P. R.Wilson. The

    ferrule effect: A literature review.

    International Endodontic Journal, 35,

    575^581, 2002.

    10. EV Bass. Cast post and core foundation

    for the badly broken down molar tooth.

    Australian Dental Journal 2002; 47 :(

    1):57-62.

    11. Oliver Pontius, Dr med dent, MSD, and

    Jeffrey W. Hutter. Survival rate and

    fracture strength of incisors restored

    with different post and core systems and

    endodontically treated incisors without

    coronoradicular reinforcement. Journal

    of endodontics Vol. 28, no. 10, October

    2002; 710-15.

    12. Ingrid Peroz, Felix Blekenstein, Klaus-

    Peter Lang, Michel Newman. Restoring

    endodontically treated teeth with posts

    and cores- A review. Quintessence Int2005; 36; 737-46.

    13. Pia K. Wegner, Sandra Freitag, and

    Matthias Kern. Survival rate of

    endodontically treated teeth with posts

    after prosthetic restoration. J Endod

    2006; 32, 928-31.