non-disabled – an oxymoron? exploring the foundations of a divisive label jennifer harris...

8
‘Non-disabled’ – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

Upload: diana-sullivan

Post on 28-Mar-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Non-disabled – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

‘Non-disabled’ – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a

divisive label

Jennifer Harris

University of York

Page 2: Non-disabled – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

Why is the term problematic?

1. Few people enjoy ‘total health’ today

2. The term is half of a dichotomy (disabled/non disabled). Cannot cope with fluctuating impairment statuses

3. It has divisive and exclusionary effects

4. ‘Non-disabled’ cast as oppressors

Page 3: Non-disabled – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

Will the non-disabled stand up?

Term is a relational concept within social model of disability, ‘either/or’ disabled/non-disabledCombinations of pollution, workplace stress family pressures and accidents ensure most people experience disablement over the life courseIs the term an oxymoron?

Page 4: Non-disabled – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

Disabled/non-disabled – it’s all relative

Dichotomy cannot cope with fluctuation in impairment

As a labelling system, it is crude and misleading.

The ‘stickiness’ of labels

Are such people disabled one day and not the next?

Page 5: Non-disabled – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

The effects of the non-disabled label

‘Non-disability’ is associated with oppressor roleApplying this dichotomy is an over-simplification of complex relations in societyIf most people experience impairment in life, then theoretically all social policies would use the social model – why not?

Page 6: Non-disabled – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

Border crossing between disabled and non-disabled statuses

Burchardt 2000.661/2

‘Only a small proportion of working-age people who experience disability are long- term disabled…the common perception that disabled and non-disabled people make up two entirely distinct and fixed groups in the population is misleading’

Page 7: Non-disabled – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

Problems of ‘non-disability’In a given year one tenth of working age population are limited in daily activitiesIn a 7 year period, one quarter experience some limitation (only 10% of these are disabled throughout)Therefore, disabled status is much more widespread than one-off surveys suggest, disabled category is more fluid than thought and ‘border crossers’ in fact form the majority of the ‘disabled’ population

Page 8: Non-disabled – an oxymoron? Exploring the foundations of a divisive label Jennifer Harris University of York

Conclusion

Social model theory does not adequately describe an experience of the majority classified as disabled – border crossingViewed from a border crossing perspective the social model is a crude analytical toolRequirement is for a sophisticated framework that adequately describes social relations without resorting to a dichotomy