non-extensive black hole thermodynamics estimate for power-law particle spectra power-law tailed...
TRANSCRIPT
Non-Extensive Black Hole Thermodynamics estimate for Power-Law Particle Spectra
• Power-law tailed spectra and their explanations
• Abstract thermodynamics
• Event horizon thermodynamics
• Estimate from a wish
Talk by T.S.Biró at the 10. Zimányi School,Budapest, Hungary, November 30 – December 3, 2010
arXiV: 1011.3442
Power-law tailed spectra
• particles and heavy ions: (SPS) RHIC, LHC
• fluctuations in financial returns
• natural catastrophes (earthquakes, etc.)
• fractal phase space filling
• network behavior
• some noisy electronics
• near Bose condensates
• citation of scientific papers….
Heavy ion collision: theoretical picture
URQMD ( Univ. Frankfurt: Sorge, Bass, Bleicher…. )
Experimentalpicture … RHIC
Tsallis quark matter + transverse flow + quark coalescence fits to hadron spectra
SQM 2008, Beijing
with Károly Ürmössy
RH
IC d
ata
Tsallis quark matter + transverse flow + quark coalescence fits to hadron spectra
SQM 2008, Beijing
with Károly Ürmössy
RH
IC d
ata
Abstract thermodynamics• S(E) = max (Jaynes-) principle
• nontrivial composition of e.g. the energy E
• 0-th law requires: factorizing form
T1(E1) = T2(E2)
• This is equivalent to the existence and use of an
additive function of energy L(E)!
• Repeated compositions asymptotically lead to
such a form! ( formal logarithm )
• Enrtopy formulas and canonical distributions
Zeroth Law: (E1,…)=(E2,…)
Which composition laws are compatible with this?
empirical temperature
with Péter Ván
Zeroth Law compatible composition of energy with Péter Ván
Zeroth Law compatible composition of energy
same
function!with Péter Ván
Zeroth Law compatible composition of energy with Péter Ván
The solutionwith Péter Ván
An example
all L( ) functions are the same!
How may Nature do this?
In small steps!
Composition Laws
),x(hx
x)0,x(h
)y,x(hyx
1nn
:steps small init Do
)0,x(hdt
dx
y
hxx
)0,x(h),x(hxx
2
)0y,x(
1nn
1n1n1nn
1n
Composition Laws
)b(L)a(LL)b,a(
)x(L)x(L)x(L
)x(L)0,z(h
dzt
1
NNNN
x
02
2121
Formal logarithm:
Additive quantity:
Asymptotic composition rule:
Composition Laws: summary
Such asymptotic rules are:
1. commutative x y = y x
2. associative (x y) z = x (y z)
3. zeroth-law compatible
222111
212
1
112
2
22111212
T
1
E
S
)E(L
1
E
S
)E(L
1
T
1
E
S
)E(L
)E(L
E
S
)E(L
)E(L
dE)E(LdE)E(LdE)E(L
Lagrange method
Superstatistics
tE
tE
)E(L
0
Et
e
et)E(L
ee dt)t(w
Canonical Power-Law
ac,et
)c(
c)t(w
aE1e
aE1lna
1)E(L
ct1c
c
a)E(L
Footnote: w(t) is an Euler-Gamma distribution in this case.
TsallisRényiBoltzmann
Entropy formulas
Entropy formulas
i
q
iR
i
q
iiT
ii
iB
pln1q
1S
)pp(1q
1S
p
1lnpS
Tsallis
Rényi
Boltzmann
Function of Entropy
TR
i
q
iR
i
q
iiT
aS1lna
1S
q1apln1q
1S
)pp(1q
1S
.max)S(YS.maxS
Tsallis
Rényi
Rényi = additive version of Tsallis
Canonical distribution with Rényi entropy
1q
1
i
i
iq
j
1q
i
iii
q
i
q1
)E(1
Z
1p
Ep
pq
q1
1
maxEppplnq1
1
This cut power-law distribution is
an excellent fit to particle spectra
in high-energy experiments!
The cut power-law distribution is
an excellent fit to particle spectra
in high-energy experiments!
How to caluclate (predict) How to caluclate (predict)
T, q, etc… ?T, q, etc… ?
What is universal in collisons?
• Event HorizonHorizon due to stopping
• Schwinger formula + Newton + Unruh = Boltzmann
T/m
3p
T
q/m2
3p
T
2T
epd
dNE
2
aT,amq,e
pd
dNE
Dima Kharzeev
Horizon thermodynamics
• Information loss ~ entropy ~ horizon area
• Additive energy, non-additive horizon
• Temperature: Unruh, Hawking
• Based on Clausius’ entropy formula
Since the 1970 - s
Quantum and Gravity Units
Scales:
in c = 1 units
Unruh temperature
• entirely classical• special relativity suffices
An observer with constant acceleration Fourier analyses a monochromatic
EM - wave from a far, static system in terms of its proper time:
the intensity distribution is proportional to the
Planck distribution !Unruh
Unruh temperature• entirely classical• special relativity suffices
An observer with constant acceleration Fourier analyses a monochromatic
EM - wave from a far, static system in terms of its proper time:
the intensity distribution is proportional to the
Planck distribution !Unruh
Max Planck
Unruh temperature
2
g1)c/g(chg
c)(x
)c/g(shg
c)(t
:Solution
gaa,1uu,0ua,d
dua
:onacceleratiConstant
22
2
Galilei
Rindler
Unruh temperature
0)(z,)(z
z
dz
g
cd
z1g
cc/xt,ez
:leNew variab
dee)ˆ(F
:amplitude wavePlane
c/g
ˆi)c/xt(i
Unruh temperature
gˆicg2/ˆcg/)gclnˆ(ic
0
g/zic1g/ˆicg/ic
eeg
c
ezdzeg
c)ˆ(F
:z in Integral
Unruh temperature
1e
1ˆg
c2
eg
c)ˆ(F
:factorIntensity
g/ˆc2
gˆic
gˆicg/ˆc
2
22
Interpret this as a black body radiation: Planck distribution of the frequency
Unruh temperature
2
LgM
2
g
cTk
2
gT
Tk
ˆˆ
g
c2
P
PB
B
Planck-interpretation:
Temperature inPlanck units:
Temperature infamiliar units:
Unruh temperature
2
2
P
2
B
2
R
L
2
McTk
R
GMg
small isit gravity NewtonianFor
On Earth’ surface it is 10^(-19) eV
Unruh temperature
2
mc1Tk
mc1
L
c1g
smallnot isit collision ionheavy a For
2
B
32
Stopping from 0.88 c to 0 in L = ħ/mc Compton wavelength distance:
kT ~ 170 MeV for mc² ~ 940 MeV (proton)
Clausius’ entropy
dET
1dS
Bekenstein-Hawking entropy
• Use Unruh temperature at horizon
• Use Clausius’ concept with that temperature
T
)Mc(dS
2
Hawking
Bekenstein
Acceleration at static horizons• Maupertuis action for test masspoints
• Euler-Lagrange eom: geodesic
• Arc length is defined by the metric
)r(fKcr
1fc/rtfKtf
fc/rtfmcL,dmcI
dc
r
)r(fc
drdt)r(fd
222
222
22222
2
2
2
2
2
22
Maupertuis
Acceleration at static horizons
)r(f4
1
c
Tk
g)r(f2
cr
r)r(fcrr2
tau wrspderivative theTake
B
2
2
This acceleration is the
red-shift corrected
surface gravity.
BH entropy inside static horizons
PP
)r(f2
2cPM
2PL
2
B
2
PP
P
P
B
M
dM
L
dr)M,r(f4
)Mc(d
k
S
.0)r(f while
)r(f2
cM
2
LgM
2
LTk
This is like a shell in a phase space!
BH entropy for static horizons
PPB
M
dM
L
dr)M,r(f4
k
S
This is like a shell in a phase space!
BH entropy: Schwarzschild
2
PB
2
P
2
P
P
PPB
2
2
P
P
2
L
A
4
1
k
S
L
RRdR
L2
M
ML
4S
k
1R2
cg,
R
1)R(f,
r
R)r(f
horizon 0)R(f
r
R1
r
L
M
M21
rc
GM21)r(f
This area law is true for all cases when f(r,M) = 1 – 2M / r + a( r ) !!!
Hawking-Bekenstein result
Schwarzschild
Schwarzschild BH: EoS
8E
Sc
E8E
S
T
1
E4S
2/RME
2
2
2
Hawking-Bekensteinentropy instable eos
S
E
T > 0c < 0
Planck units: k = 1, ħ = 1, G = 1, c = 1B
Schwarzschild BH: deformed entropy
22
2
2
2
Ea41
1Ea48c
Ea41
E8
T
1
Ea41lna
1aS1ln
a
1S
Tsallis-deformed HB
entropy for large E stable eos
☻S
E
T > 0c < 0
T > 0c > 0
a = q - 1a = q - 1
arXiV: 1011.3442
Schwarzschild BH: quantum zero point
rays) cosmic 9/2a(2
a
EE8
M
R22
LM
2
a2
ME
2
0
0
2
PPP
P
0
EoS stability limit is at / below the
quantum zero point motion energy
☻S
E
T > 0c < 0
T > 0c > 0
STAR, PHENIX, CMS: a ~ 0.20 - 0.22
inflection point
E0
arXiV: 1011.3442
Bekenstein bound
Tsallis quark matter + transverse flow + quark coalescence fits to hadron spectra
SQM 2008, Beijing
with Károly Ürmössy
RH
IC d
ata
Tsallis quark matter + transverse flow + quark coalescence fits to hadron spectra
SQM 2008, Beijing
with Károly Ürmössy
RH
IC d
ata
Blast wave fits and quark coalescence
SQM 2008, Beijing
202642.12
1q2
with Károly Ürmössy
Summary
• Thermodynamics build on composition laws
• Deformed entropy formulas
• Hawking entropy: phase space of f ( r ) = 0: horizon ‘size’
• Schwarzschild BH: Boltzmann entropy unstable eos
• Rényi entropy: stable BH eos at high energy ( T > Tmin )
• Estimate for q: from the instability being in the Trans-
Planckian domain
4
1
s,
21q
2