nonequilibrium free energy relations and experiments - lecture 3 equilibrium helmholtz free energy...

18
Equilibrium Syst Equilibrium Syst 0 (0) 0 (τ) M T : τime reversa mapping 0 T (τ) 0 T (0) Forward , ΔW (τ) =B ±dB Crooks Relation Reverse,ΔW(τ)=−BmdB Pr F (ΔW=B) Pr R (ΔW=−B) =e −βΔA e βB Jarzynski Relati e −βΔW F =e −βΔA NonEquilibrium Free Energy Evans, Mol Phys, 20,1551(2003).

Post on 21-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Equilibrium System 1Equilibrium System 2

dΓ0 (0)

dΓ0 (τ)

M T: timereversal

mapping

dΓ0T (τ)

dΓ0T (0)

Forward, ΔW(τ) =B±dB

Crooks Relation: Reverse,ΔW(τ)=−BmdBPrF(ΔW=B)PrR(ΔW=−B)=e−βΔAeβB⇒Jarzynski Relation:

e−βΔWF=e−βΔANonEquilibrium Free Energy

Evans, Mol Phys, 20,1551(2003).

Page 2: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Crooks proof:

systems are deterministic and canonical

exp[−ΔW(Γ0 )] 0→1= dΓ0∫ f0 (Γ0 ,0)exp[−β[H1(t)−H0 (0)] + dsΛ(s)

0

t

∫ ]

= dΓ0∫ f0 (Γ0 ,0)f1(Γ1

∗,0)dΓ1∗z1

f0 (Γ0 ,0)dΓ0z0

=z1z0

dΓ1∗∫ f1(Γ1

∗,0) =exp[−β(A1 −A0 )]

P0→1(ΔW(Γ0 ) =a)P1→ 0 (ΔW(Γ

1

* ) =−a)=

f0 (Γ0 ,0)dΓ0

f1(Γ1* ,0)dΓ1

*

=exp[ΔW(Γ0 )]z1z0

=exp[a−β(A1 −A0 )]

Jarzynski Equality proof:

Page 3: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Jarzynski and NPI.

exp[−βΔW]F= exp[−βΔWrev −Ωt ] F

=exp[−βΔA] exp[−Ωt ]

=exp[−βΔA], NPI

Take the Jarzynski work and decompose into into its reversible and irreversible parts.Then we use the NonEquilibrium Partition Identity to obtain the Jarzynski workRelation:

Page 4: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Proof of generalized Jarzynski Equality.

For any ensemble we define a generalized “work” function as:

exp[ΔXτ (G)] ≡Pr1(G0 ,δG0 )Z(λ1 )Pr2 (Gτ ,δGτ )Z(λ2 )

=f1(G0 )δG0Z(λ1 )f2 (Gτ )δGτZ(λ2 )

We observe that the Jacobian gives the volume ratio:

∂Gτ

∂G0

=δGτ

δG0

=f1(G0 , 0)

f1(Gτ , τ)

Page 5: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

We now compute the expectation value of the generalized work.

exp[−ΔXτ (G)] = dG0f1(G0 )∫f2 (Gτ )δGτZ(λ2 )f1(G0 )δG0Z(λ1 )

=Z(λ2 )Z(λ1 )

dGτf2 (Gτ )∫ =Z(λ2 )Z(λ1 )

If the ensembles are canonical and if the systems are in contact with heat reservoirs at the same temperature

exp[ΔXτ (G)] =

exp[−βH1(G0 )]exp[−βH2 (Gτ )]

f1(Gτ , τ)f1(G0 , 0)

⇒ ΔXτ (G) = β(H2 (Gτ ) − H1(G0 )) − βΔQτ (G0 )

= βΔWτ (G0 ) QED

Page 6: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

NEFER for thermal processes

Assume equations of motion

Then from the equation for the generalized “work”:

Page 7: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Generalized “power”

Classical thermodynamics gives

Page 8: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

• single colloidal particle• position & velocity

measured precisely• impose & measure small

forces

• small system• short trajectory• small external forces

Strategy of experimental demonstration of the FTs

. . . measure energies, to a fraction of , along paths

kBT

Page 9: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Optical Trap Schematic

Photons impart momentum to the particle, directing it towards the most intense part of the beam.

r

k < 0.1 pN/m, 1.0 x 10-5 pN/Å

Fopt = −kr

Page 10: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Optical Tweezers Lab

quadrant photodiode position detector sensitive to 15 nm, means that we can resolve forces down to 0.001 pN or energy fluctuations of

0.02 pN nm (cf. kBT=4.1 pN nm)

Page 11: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

As ΔA=0,and FT and Crooks are “equivalent”

For the drag experiment...

ve

loci

ty

time

0

t=0

vopt = 1.25 m/sec

Wang, Sevick, Mittag, Searles & Evans, “Experimental Demonstration of Violations of the Second Law of Thermodynamics” Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002)

t > 0, work is required to translate the particle-filled trap

t < 0, heat fluctuations provide useful work

“entropy-consuming” trajectory

Ωt =WΩt =

1

kBTds

0

t

∫ Fopt (s)• vopt

Page 12: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

First demonstration of the (integrated) FT

FT shows that entropy-consuming trajectories are observable out to 2-3 seconds in this experiment

Wang, Sevick, Mittag, Searles & Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 050601 (2002)

P Ωt < 0( )P Ωt > 0( )

= exp −Ωt( ) Ωt >0

Page 13: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Histogram of Ωt for Capture

k0 = 1.22 pN/m

k1 = (2.90, 2.70) pN/m

predictions from Langevin dynamics

Carberry, Reid, Wang, Sevick, Searles & Evans, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2004)

Page 14: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

The LHS and RHS of the Integrated Transient Fluctuation Theorem (ITFT) versus time, t. Both sets of data were evaluated from 3300 experimental trajectories of a colloidal particle, sampled over a millisecond time interval. We also show a test of the NonEquilibrium Partition Identity.

(Carberry et al, PRL, 92, 140601(2004))

ITFT

NPI

Page 15: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

ln(Ni/N-i)

Ωt

--Capture FT

26 Integration time is mS

Page 16: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

Summary Exptl Tests of Steady State Fluctuation Theorem

• Colloid particle 6.3 µm in diameter.• The optical trapping constant, k, was determined by applying the equipartition theorem: k = kBT/<r2>.•The trapping constant was determined to be k = 0.12 pN/µm and the relaxation time of the stationary system was τ =0.48 s.• A single long trajectory was generated by continuously translating the microscope stage in a circular path.• The radius of the circular motion was 7.3 µm and the frequency of the circular motion was 4 mHz.• The long trajectory was evenly divided into 75 second long, non-overlapping time intervals, then each interval (670 in number) was treated as an independent steady-state trajectory from which we constructed the steady-state dissipation functions.

Page 17: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

-0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4

SSFT, Newtonian, t=0.25s

ln(Ni/N-i)

Ωtss

Page 18: NonEquilibrium Free Energy Relations and experiments - Lecture 3 Equilibrium Helmholtz free energy differences can be computed nonequilibrium thermodynamic

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

SSFT, Newtonian t=2.5s

ln(Ni/N-i)

Ωtss