nonrandom sampling
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Systematic Convenience Purposive
Population Genaralizability
Ecological Genearalizability
![Page 2: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Every nth individual in the population list is selected.
eg: the principal of a school has 1000 students, she wants to know how students feel about the new menu at cafeteria, so the principal:-
1. get a list of the student’s name (in alphabetical order).
2. she select every 10th student until she has a sample of 100 students to be interviewed.
![Page 3: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PERIODICITY-a marked bias sample caused by the arrangement pattern of individual on the list accidentally coincides with the sampling interval.
eg: grouped by gpa(grade point average),
high/low interval: only good/poor graded get chosen.
Therefore, researchers should carefully examine the list and avoid bias.
![Page 4: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
A convenience sample is a group of individuals who conveniently available.
samples:1. first 50 people who walk in.2. interview people at downtown.3. two front rows students.
![Page 5: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Bias- 1. not downtown = not interviewed 2. unwilling = not interviewed 3. willing = strong opinion 4. interview time = at work
In general, convenience sample cannot be considered representative of any population and should be avoided.
![Page 6: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Based on previous knowledge of a population and the specific purpose of the research,researcher use personal judgement to select a sample.
eg:SUITABLE SAMPLE a. 2 good students,2 average & 2 weak b. sample from Retired Workers Association eg: sample know the target A. people in charge of school B. people with experience
THUS, the only challenge with purposive sampling is the researcher’s previous knowledge must be thorough.
![Page 7: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sample should be as large as a researcher can obtain with a reasonable expenditure of time and energy.
Ideals; 100 samples for DESCRIPTIVE STUDY 50 samples for CORRELATION STUDY 30 samples in each group for EXPERIMENTAL
STUDY& CAUSAL-COMPARATIVE STUDY
![Page 8: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
External Validity = the result of a study can be generalised from sample to population.
Ecological generalizability = result of a study can be generalised to other settings.
Population generalizability = result of study can be generalised to the intended population
-representativeness: relevant characteristicsOverlooked “method”-random student=random
teacher=random result.
Lost subject effect representativeness, researcher who lost 10 % sample are advised to acknowledge this limitation.
![Page 9: Nonrandom sampling](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022100603/5595a7241a28ab90168b47f3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1. researcher should describe the sample thoroughly; reader judge the result validity.
2. Replication; repeat the study on different group or situation. If result is the same; generalise it.