noonan et al v bowen et al - motion to augment motion on appeal 1310051.pdf

Upload: jack-ryan

Post on 04-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Noonan et al v Bowen et al - Motion to Augment Motion on Appeal 1310051.pdf

    1/7

    PAMELA BARNETT Agent2351 Sunset Blvd., Ste. 170-921Rocklin, CA, 95765916.626.2831Self-represented, Private Citizen

    COURT OF APPEAL,3rd APPELLATE DISTRICTSTATE OF CALIFORNIA

    Plaintiffs f r P p ~ t v TNOONAN and RNETTv.Defendant r 2 L f : ; P O r J o e t 1 J T ~BOWEN et al

    Case: C071764MOTION TO AUGMENTRECORD ON APPEALVERIFICATIONDOCUMENTS ATTACHED

    Pursuant to Rule 8.155 a) of the California Rules ofCourt, I, 11), request augmentationof the record on appeal to include documents in this case that were not included in theJoint Appendix and are material to Plaintiffs Reply Briefs. Copies of the documents tobe added to the record are attached to this motion. Those documents are:Verifications ofEDWRD NOONAN AND PAMELA BARNETT for the FIRSTAMENDED PREROGATIVE WRIT OF MANDATE ND RESTRAINT OFFUNDRAISING. Plaintiffis requesting that these documents be added to the recordbecause these are pages missing from the APPELLANTS APPENDIXI declare under penalty ofperjury under the laws ofCalifornia that the foregoing is trueand correct. Executed at Lincoln, California this 4th day ofOctober, 2013 .

    ~ ~r,.., ....... AgentMPeulJ VT

  • 8/14/2019 Noonan et al v Bowen et al - Motion to Augment Motion on Appeal 1310051.pdf

    2/7

    PAMELA BARNETT Agent2351 Sunset Blvd Ste. 170-921Rocklin, CA, 95765916.626.2831Self-represented, Private Citizen

    OURT OF APPEAL, 3rd APPELLATE DISTRICTSTATE OF CALIFORNIA

    Plaintiffs { + J p e ~NOONAN and BARNETT

    v.JoA.Jl eflllITDefendant f

    BOWEN etal

    Case: C071764MOTION TO AUGMENTRECORD ON APPEALMEMOR NDUM OF POINTSND AUTHORITIESVERIFICATIONDO UMENTS ATTACHED

    Rule 8.155 a) of California Rules of Court permits the augmentation of the appellate Record. Inthis case, the Verification pages for Appellants are missing from the First Amended PrerogativeWrit ofMandate and Restraint of Fundraising. The need for augmentation here is compelling,these verifications were missing in the APPELLANTS Appendix, therefore the record isincomplete. Not only is augmentation necessary, it will not prejudice any party. Theaugmentation request concerns documents which were part of the lower court record.Additionally, the augmentation will not cause a substantial delay in this appeal.

    CONCLUSIONFor the above reasons, this Court should order the record to be augmented on appeal byincluding the Verifications of Appellants NOONAN and BARNETT in support of the FirstAmended Prerogative Writ ofMandate and Restraint ofFundraising which are attached to thismotion.Respectfully Submitted,

    Placer County, California

  • 8/14/2019 Noonan et al v Bowen et al - Motion to Augment Motion on Appeal 1310051.pdf

    3/7

    PAMELA BARNETT Agent2351 Sunset Blvd., Ste. 170-921Rocklin, CA, 95765916.626.2831Self-represented, Private CitizenOURT OF APPEAL rd APPELLATE DISTRICT

    STATE OF CALIFORNIA

    Plaintiffs f T F ~ I . t { V r 5 )NOONAN and B RNETTv.Defendant l < - e 5 f { t v / e f \ J \ ~BOWEN et al

    Case: C071764DE L R TION IN SUPPORTOF MOTION TO AUGMENTRE ORD ON APPEAL

    APPELLANT BARNETT declares and states as follows: I am a self-represented litigant.APPELLANT requests court to approve MOTION TO AUGMENT RECORD ON APPEAL Verifications) as the Verificationsof APPELLANTS for the First Amended Prerogative Writ ofMandate are missing from the APPELLANTS APPENDIX and are a necessary element for therecord on appeal.Because the documents requested are attached to this motion, there will be no significant delay.I know of no prejudice to any party as a result of the granting of this motion. This motion ismade in good faith for the reasons set forth above and not for the purposes of delay. I declareunder penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Respectfully Submitted,

    LA B RNETI AGENT ppgL.L- tt'J l Placer County, California

  • 8/14/2019 Noonan et al v Bowen et al - Motion to Augment Motion on Appeal 1310051.pdf

    4/7

    . :

    DECLARATION OFOMITTEDVERIFICATION FORTHEFIRST AMENDED.qREROGATIVE WRIT OFMANDATE andRESTRAINT OFFUND RAISING

    CaseNo.34 2012 80001048

    }}

    V.

    Respondents.

    SUPERIOR COURT OFCALIFORNIA

    _ l ~ _ __ x

    DECLARATION OFOMITTED VERIFICATION OFFIRST AMENDED PETITION forPREROGATIVE WRITOFMANDATE AND RESTRAINT OFFUNDRAISING

    COUNTY OFSACRAMENTO

    Edward C. Noonan Pamela BarnettSharon Chickering George MillerTony oorz. NeilTurner GaryWilmottPetitioners

    Debra Bowen individually andofficial1y asThe California secretary of StateBarack Hussein Obama II; O M RMERIC C LIFORNI; John andJane Does andXYZ Entities.

    I Edward C.Noonan. petitioner decfare as follows that the attached Verificationwas inadvertently omittedfrom the filingof theFirstAmended Prerogative WritofMandate andRestraint of Fundraising. I declare underperjury under the laws ofCalifornia that the foregoing is trueand correct.DATED: I Jl IIS SUCalifornia

    April l J.-.- 2012

    EdwardC.Noonan PamelaBarnettSharonChickering GeorgeMillerTony obNeil Turner GaryWdmottAll ProSe SelfRepresented PetitionersAdHoc California registeredvoterswithserviceat 7 3 rrth AvenueOlivehurst CA 9596Telephone: 530-845-5186

    33

    3534

    123456789

    101112131415161718192021223242526272829303132

    36373839404142

  • 8/14/2019 Noonan et al v Bowen et al - Motion to Augment Motion on Appeal 1310051.pdf

    5/7

    Accordingly. I, PAMELABARNETT. beingdulysworn, deposeandsayunderpenalty ofperjuryunder the lawsof theStateof California:

    That Iama petitionerself represented withoutbeingan attorney, over21 yearsofagewithplacefor serviceat 171311thAvenue Olivehurst, CA95961

    1234567891011

    VERIFI TIONSTATE OFCALIFORNIACOUNTY OFa cef?:

    ) 55

    12131415161718

    192022232425262182930313213

    I havereadthe petitioners First Amended Prerogative Writ of Mandateand Restraintof Fundraising of theCalifornia Secretary of StateSOS to bar ballotaccessofineligible declared candidatesfor officeof President of theUnitedStates(POlUS) at the2012election cycle withrestraintof fundraising of such committees asa matterofimminentharmand irreparableinjUry with timeasthe essence, and I knowits contents;the factsstatedare true to my ownpersonal knowledge, exceptas to thematters thereinstated to beallegedon information andbelief, andasto thosematters I believeit tobetrue.Thegroundsof mybeliefsas to allmatters not statedupon information andbeliefareas follows: 3,d parties. booksand records, and personal knowledge exceptas to

    Swom.10 beforemeThis : day of January2 12

    CYNTHI Y OECOURTENCommission 9 3 76.... Notary PublicCaliforniaz Placer CountyJ l Comm Expires Dec 12. 20141

  • 8/14/2019 Noonan et al v Bowen et al - Motion to Augment Motion on Appeal 1310051.pdf

    6/7

    APP-009PROOF OF SERVICE (Court of Appeal) FOR COURTUSEONLY Mail o Personal Service

    Notice: This form may be used to provide proof that a document has beenserved in a proceeding in the Court of Appeal. Please read InformationSheet for ProofofService CourtofAppeal) (form APP-009-INFO) beforecompleting this form.

    Case Name:. I-V me,v-t', EG(./f .-rJ.//y C /O/V I /V fiJ M-O ?'14,vvI{)Vn,,-,a. Mail. I mailed a copy of the document identified above as follows:

    (1) I enclosed a copy of the document identified above in an envelope or envelopes and(a) deposited the sealed envelope(s) with the U.S. Postal Service, with the postage fully prepaid.(b) 0 placed the envelope(s) for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown in items below,following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business s practice of collectingand processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed forcollection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the U.S. Postal Service, in asealed envelope(s) with postage fully prepaid.

    (2) Date mailed: /0 /s-) 3(3) The envelope was or envelopes were addressed as follows: l ~ G , . - t V ( 1 v o l f l IX/,vc.i \)

    (a) Person servec(06A-f1 >p..-..0( 3 f}- J 1,1}- R>t:- f+lJ eRIcr+) c:{U q 1 - I C ; - i d e . ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 P ; ' 1(l) . Cl:Lep-,4LtC cc/oocu-ee- Bq , U,5 JvS cp . ~ vANdadme. r ID 9 t o uJ/lfSIIl r-e ( J / ~ L r3;;;; 0 Sh ft:, J , ? o ~II ress: . /.1 ~ I o . . I l . r r I6+e, ;;J..;>OO 900;;1. I q ' - ~ IC 0 ~ 1 : i 1 Lfl-J

    (b) Person served: DC;:: 6f< A 8 De...u.t:CfV) e 5t:J.(i) Name: Prr \ i hof l 1 lf1 J-/ D. . 5 e < : - r u - ~ to I C/J,

    (c) Person served: CL--ff P- F:(i) Name: ;:5c-cca-e- fo(ii) Address: ?d 0 t- h.-5 a C r - , , f ? v i ~ / - . I - o . ;

    o Additiotial persons served are listed on the attached page (write APP-009, Item 3a at the top of the page).Page 1 of2

    www.courtinfo.ca.goPROOF OF SERVICE(Court of Appeal)

    (4) I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing OCCUrred The document was mailed from(city and state):

    FormApprovedfor OptionalUseJudicialCouncilof CaIWomiaAPP-009[NewJanuary1, 2009]

  • 8/14/2019 Noonan et al v Bowen et al - Motion to Augment Motion on Appeal 1310051.pdf

    7/7

    APP

    3. b. 0 Personal delivery. I personally delivered a copy of the document identified above as follows:1 Person served:

    a Name:b Address where delivered:

    c Date delivered:d Time delivered:

    2 Person served:a Name:b Address where delivered:

    c Date delivered:d Time delivered:

    3 Person served:a Name:b Address where delivered:

    c Date delivered:d Time delivered:

    o Names and addresses of additional persons served and delivery dates and times are listed on the attachedpage writeAPP-009, Item 3b at the top the page).

    RSON COMPLETING THIS FORM

    APP 009 [New January 1 2009] PROOF OF SERVICECourt of AppealPage f