nordac2002
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Nordac2002
1/5
Communication Possibilities for Remote Control and Condition Monitoring of
Small-Scale Hydro Power Plant
Tuomo Lindh
Lappeenranta University of
Technology
Department of Electrical
EngineeringP. O. Box 20,
Lappeenranta, Finland
+358 5 621 6779
Fax +358 5 621 6799
E-mail: [email protected]
Jero Ahola
Lappeenranta University of
Technology
Department of Electrical
EngineeringP. O. Box 20,
Lappeenranta, Finland
+358 5 621 6761
Fax +358 5 621 6799
E-mail: [email protected]
Jarmo Partanen
Lappeenranta University of
Technology
Department of Electrical
EngineeringP. O. Box 20,
Lappeenranta, Finland
+358 5 621 6702
Fax +358 5 621 6799
E-mail: [email protected]
Heikki Pirttiniemi
Waterpumps WP Oy
Karhusuontie 39
00780 Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland
+358 9 3855 907
Fax +358 9 345 4002
E-mail:[email protected]
ABSTRACT
In this paper we compare different remote controlling
methods for a small-scale hydropower plant in terms of cost
efficiency, complexity and capability to provide
information. In addition, requirements of each solution for
hardware software and communication media are
discussed. Examples of different solutions are presented by
implementations in laboratory conditions and in the pilot
plants of Tirva HPP in Valkeala and Hiitolanjoen Voima
HPP in Simpele. The costs of the presented controlling
applications are much lower than in traditional remote
control systems used in power plants.
Keywords: Small-scale hydro power, remote controlling,
remote access, condition monitoring.
1 INTRODUCTION
Small-scale hydropower plants can be profitable if both the
investment costs and the running costs are low enough.
Especially, if the government subsidises the small-scalerenewable energy production. However, because the amount of
energy production is low, the plants controlling equipment
should be inexpensive. On the other hand, the plant should be
remote controllable so that the labour costs are minimised. The
labour costs are normally very low in fully automated plants butthey will be increased as service visits are done. The optimum
between investments in remote controlling and amount of
labour costs depends on the type, size and location of the plant.
In addition, controlling solution depends on the skills ofoperators. For example, if the controlling tasks require
programming skills, normal operator is not able to control the
plant or at least the risks of use are too high. Direct plantcontroller connection, field bus gateways, remote access server
based controlling and SMS based controlling are the
alternatives for the conventional distribution automation. Inaddition, web-based techniques can be applied in controlling
tasks. The condition monitoring and remote diagnostics hasalso an important role in unmanned plants. It is an integrated
part of the field level automation.
2 TYPICAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SMALL SCALE
POWER PLANT
The small-scale or micro-scale hydro power plant can have a
power generation from approximately 50 kW to 2 MW (figure
1). The main circuit of a small-scale hydro power plant is
illustrated in figure 2. In the most usual cases the generators arelow voltage synchronous or asynchronous generators. The
switchboard of the plant automatically runs startup and
shutdown procedures and controls the power generation
according to a set value. The set value is calculated for examplefrom the difference between actual level and aimed level of the
up water. The energy produced by generators is fed to medium
voltage network through distribution transformer. The energy is
usually measured from low voltage side of the transformer.
Figure 1. A small-scale power plant (1 MW) in rural area faraway from service personnel.
-
8/8/2019 Nordac2002
2/5
MF MF
F
3
200 kW
690 /400Vcos=0.841500r/min
1.1 kW
400Vcos =0.81500r/min
200kW
690/ 400Vcos =0.841500r/min
1.1kW
400Vcos =0.81500r/min
3~ 50Hz 380V
V
250kVAr
3x185+50(Cu),
150Cu
1000A
MKEM 3x2.5+2.5
40A 40A
Powerfactor cotroller
Cu 30x10
500 A 500 A
63Aaux supply
3x300Cu +120 Cu
0Q0
1Q0 2Q0
VS1
2x150Cu
1Q1 2Q1
0Q120A
0FS2
CONTROLCIRCUITS
1F2
1K2 2K2
2F2
MKEM 3x2.5+2.5
CONTROLCIRCUITS
Surge arrester
2x(3x300 Cu) +2x120Cu)
150Cu
3x300Cu +120Cu
3x185+50 (Cu),
2x(180Cu)
In=800A , Ip=65 kA
3
PE Bar
Figure 2. The main circuit of a small-scale hydro power plant.
The main components are illustrated using pictures.
3 ALTERNATIVES FOR REMOTE CONTROLLING
Some alternatives for remote controlling of small-scale power
plant are presented in this chapter.
Plant PLC and GSM- or PTT-modemThe simplest remote controlling or monitoring implementation
requires only GSM- or PTT-modem and approximately 30 rows
of programmable logic (PLC) program code (figure 3). This
applies to one directional data transfer, usually a SMS message
that alarms or just informs the personnel. If a PLC program canhandle the most usual abnormal situations this kind of an
implementation can reduce the service costs delivering the
necessary information about the failure or alarm. Based on this
information can be determined whether the service visit is
required or not. In pilot hydro plants, the typical messages areloss of mains or return of mains. The investment costs of this
type of system is approximately 1000.
This type of implementation can also receive SMS messages.However, it requires more PLC code than a simple
unidirectional data communications and the complexity of thePLC program increases but the implementation costs still
remain low. The number of feasible instructions is quite limiteddue to restrictions PLC (memory restriction).
PLCPLC PLC
PLC
Plant Controller
Generator Controllers
Field Bus
GSM GSM
Figure 3. The simplest remote monitoring implementation, oneway data transfer from PLC to GSM using SMS.
It is also possible to have a more sophisticated monitoring and
remote control by using a very simple fieldbus protocol through
a modem. This implementation requires that remote controllingof the plant (user side) is done by a computer instead of a GSM
telephone. A schema of communications is illustrated in figure
4 and implementation is illustrated in figure 5.The functionalityof the implementation is described in the text and the flowchart
(figure 6) below.
PLCPLC PLC
PLC
Plant Controller
Generator Controllers
Field Bus
GSM GSM
PC
Remote
Control
Figure 4. Schema of simple PLC based remote control for a
small-scale power plant.
Figure 5. Implementation of PLC based remote control. Simplefieldus protocol is driven over a telephone line.
When something abnormal happens in the plant the plant
controller PLC changes modem to SMS mode and sends the
SMS message to the remote controlling PC. Subsequently, the
PLC changes the modem in normal mode and waits forconnection from the remote control program. When the call to
modem is received, the PLC answers to the call and starts
waiting for the fielbus command from remote PC that operates
as master unit. Respectively, the plant controller PLC operates
as slave. The whole data memory area of the plant controllerPLC can be read and written by the specially built PC program.
The hardware costs are increased with a client side computer
only. The implementation is still quite simple but the
programming work both in plant side and in remote controller
side are remarkably bigger that in previously presented cases.However, when the programs are made the costs remain very
low with increased controlling capacity compared to previously
presented communication structures.
-
8/8/2019 Nordac2002
3/5
MESSAGESTO
SEND
WAIT FOR MODEMEVENTS
MODEMCOMMUNICATION
RUNNING
CHANGE TO SMS MODE
SEND THE MESSAGE
BACK TO NORMAL MODE
MODEMCALLS
WAIT FOR FIELDBUSCOMMANDS
FIELDBUSCOMMAND
OK
ESCAPE CODE
NO
NO
NO
NO
SEND ERRORCODE
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
PROCESS AND SEND
Figure 6. Initialisation and execution of PLC remote control.
Plant PLC, local PC-supervision, modem line and remote PCIf a versatile plan man machine interface (MMI) interface is
required at the plant, one solution is industrial PC or in somecases even an ordinary PC (figure 7). In this implementation,the control and reporting possibilities become much better than
in previous implementations and number of feasible functions
increases. In this implementation also all the communication
examples presented in previous paragraphs are possible.
PLCPLC PLC
PLC
Plant Controller
Generator Controllers
Field Bus
GSM GSM
PC
Remote
Control
PC
Local
Control
Figure 7. Versatile PC based remote controlling for a small-
scale power plant.
Local PC can send SMS-messages and transfer data between plant controller PLC and the remote controlling computer.
Local PC works as a fieldbus gateway. This type of
implementation has some advantageous properties. The amount
of transferred data between plant and remote controller is low
when only the information that is needed is transferred. Thiskind of implementation has one drawback. The computer of the
plant cannot be administered with this solution. If full
administration is needed the remote access program can be used
instead of this solution.
The remote access programs such as PCAnywhere or VNCoffer cheap or free solution of remote controlling. They can be
used in WAN-network or with modems also. When used with
modems a dial-up Internet connection of PC is used. The local
plant computer acts as a remote access master and remote useras slave. The advantage of the remote access program is that the
user can control the plant computer as a local user. The user canopen programs, shut programs even re-program the plant PLC
if needed. The disadvantage of the solution is that the amountof transferred data is big when the whole display of the plant
computer is transferred to the user. Every action takes lot of
time even if the display of the plant computer is transferred to
user with minimum number of colours. Another drawback isthat the user can do everything that can be done locally
meaning that even the removal of programs is possible. Theunauthorized use is prevented with passwords of remote access
program and by restricting the access to plant from predefinedphone numbers only.
Internet/JAVA techniques can be used with this hardware
structure also. The same dial up Internet connection that is used
with remote access programs can be used to provide WEB-
services such as interactive applet with monitoring and
controlling possibilities. The user only needs Internet browserand modem in the client side computer. The disadvantages of
this kind of system are also the slow communication speed and
the single user environment. The later restriction also applies to
WAP connections.
Integration to existing DA-systems of electricity companyIf the remote control of the plant (substation level automation)
is made by systems separate from existing integrated DA-system of an electricity company the operational costs may
increase. However, it is possible to integrate some of the
systems presented previously to existing DA by very simple
and low costs method. The leading DA/DSM systems utilizedatabases with ODBC and JDBC connectivity. The integration
to DA/DSM can be done in control room by these methods and
control of small-scale plant can be done utilizing the database
services as will be presented.
The communication infrastructure presented in this chapter
allows multiple simultaneous users, which is not normally
needed in controlling tasks in small-scale hydro power plants.However, it may be an attractive alternative for example in the
cases where green energy is sold. The customers can view the
energy production in Internet. Another reason to present this
method here, as mentioned before, is that it supplies means forintegration of systems presented here to existing DA/DSM
systems used in electricity companies. The system is described
in detail in [Lin01].
At the control centre level or at the plant level the systems canbe integrated using databases. The control room level software
is illustrated in figure 8. On the other hand, the samefunctionality can be installed at the plant level (figure 10). All
measurement data or registers of devices are read and writtenthrough database tables. Global connection is available for user
by a standard web-browser. When a connection to http-portof server is opened, an applet with graphical user interface
(GUI) and connection data is loaded to the browser. Based onthe log data, the system determines the actions that are allowed
for user. The user can execute only the functions that are codedto the applet.
LAN
DA/DSM
Data Interface
CONTROL CENTER LEVEL
Data Storage
Management
ODBC client OPC client
Data managerDataStoragedb
(WINDOWS service )
PLANT CONTROLLER
Fieldbus Master
MODEM LINE
Fieldbus Slave
Figure 8. Integration between existing DA/DSM and remote
control of small-scale plant.
-
8/8/2019 Nordac2002
4/5
At program level, a connection to a database is formed withJDBC API. The JDBC is a standardised interface that provides
connectivity to a wide range of SQL databases. JDBC driver isloaded with Java applet. Installation of programs or any other
files is not needed in a client computer. In our demonstration,
type 3 JDBC driver is used which means that calls are not made
from client to DBMS-server directly. The JDBC driver
translates JDBC calls to a protocol that server side data servertranslates to a DBMS protocol.
The connection to local databases can be done using standard
ODBC or OPC interfaces. In our demonstration it was donewith OPC connection. The OPC server handles connections to
the Profibus and serves simultaneously multiple OPC clients.
The server is capable of reading and writing registers ofindividual device connected to field bus.
Database server acts as the software interface between web
applications or control centre applications (DA/DSM) andapplications performing data transmission between control
centre level and field level. The database server is a standard
Microsof SQL Server. Measured values, configuration of
field device registers (OPC tags) and requests for changes of
registers are all stored in the database tables.
A Windows NT service was developed for this demonstration.It consists of OPC client part, ODBC client part and of service
routines. The service monitors the changes in configuration
tables. Based on these changes, the service transfers data
through OPC and ODBC interfaces between the fieldbus
devices and database server.
4 REQUIREMENTS OF CONDITION MONITORING
There are needs for condition monitoring also in small-scale
power plants. The small-scale plants are typically unmanned
due to economical limitations. Therefore, the condition
monitoring should be based on automatic and remotediagnostics. The condition monitoring and diagnostics system
have two requirements. It should detect possible failures before
they lead to emergency shutdown of the plant. Secondly, thesystem should be robust and not to alarm when a real failure
does not exist.
For example, in small-scale hydro power plants there are
numerous important objects that should be monitored. The most
important objects to be monitored are generator and turbine.
Overheating can destroy the windings of the generator.
Respectively, an increase of humidity indicates a leakage inturbine-generator package. The bearings are also possible
reason for generator failure. Therefore, also a bearing
monitoring should be introduced.
The condition monitoring equipment can be connected into theplants field bus and the remote diagnostics can be realised by
communications methods presented in previous chapters.
Generally it can be assumed that the condition monitoringfunctions do not need large data transfer capacity. The need of
capacity depends mainly on the fact, where the condition
monitoring data is analysed. Local analysis and intelligent
sensors shrink the needed bandwidth. Respectively, transferringof raw measurement data dramatically increases need of the
bandwidth.
Condition monitoring functions for underwater hydro powergenerators have been developed. A microprocessor based
sensor can be installed inside the generators frame. The sensortakes supply power directly from the terminals of the generator.
The sensor measures and analyses for example vibrations,temperature and humidity. The analysed data is transferred
from the sensor using generators feeder cable as a
communications channel. Based on [Aho02], low voltage
power cables are applicable for power-line communications. In
system under development, the master unit is located at theswitchboard. It receives the data that the sensor has sent and
links it into plants field bus. Thus, the condition monitoring
data is available for remote diagnostics.
5 EXPERIMENTS FROM PILOT PLANTS
The first pilot, Tirva HPP, was equipped with the GSM-modem
connected to PLC as in figure 3. With this very simple schemathe number of service visits was reduced remarkably. The
problem was that the SMS message could not inform the
personnel as much as they wanted. For example, alarms for
intruders were many (surveillance of the yard was included),but no harm was done when checked in plant. Also the need for
local reporting with event log was discovered. The local PC
was added and because there was an existing telephone line at
the plant the PTT modem was installed in parallel with theGSM modem. Further, the remote access program was installed
so that events can be checked remotely. The system includes
also the WEB-camera that shows the view at the dam. The
number of unnecessary service visits was further decreased.The repayment of investment is estimated to be two years. The
final schema is presented in figure 7.
PLCPLC PLC
PLC
Plant Controller
Generator Controllers
Field Bus
GSM GSM
PC
Remote
Control
PC Local
Control
Modem ModemTelephone line
Figure 9. The structure of the controlling system in pilot plantin Tirva.
Second pilot in Simpele also includes local PC-controlling
program. The wired telephone line is used for the energy
measurement collection use only. Therefore the GSM have to
be used in communication between plant and the service personnel. The principal structure of the communication is as
presented in Fig. 3. The investment costs of communicationsare low but the operational costs are higher than in previous
example because of the higher costs of communication.
6 CONCLUSIONS
It is too expensive to connect micro scale or small scale power
plant as a part of the conventional distribution automation
system with local RTU, (perhaps local SCADA), radio
communication and remote SCADA. This does not mean thatthe unmanned use is too expensive nor that the system cannot
be integrated to existing DA/DSM. GSM-modem or PTT-
modem connected to plant controller PLC offer the very low
cost methods for remote control. The service cost reductions pay the investment practically in all cases where unmanned
operation of plant is in use and also if the plant is partiallymanned (not 24 hours per day).
If the monitoring of plants operation is needed locally and the
local environmental conditions are good enough the use of PC
is justified. Furthermore, if only the one directional
-
8/8/2019 Nordac2002
5/5
communication is used, the personnel have to visit the plantalmost weekly in order to be sure that the no service actions are
needed. Fieldbus gateway through modem and loacal computerrequires less communication capacity than the use of the remote
access programs when only the needed information is
transferred. However, the remote access programs make
possible more versatile control of the plant. The integration to
existing DA/DSM can be done at control room level using opendata interfaces. The condition monitoring functions can be
integrated as a part of automation systems of a plant and thus as
a part of the remote controlling schema.
WWW -Browser
INTERNET
WAN
Plant ControllerPLC
Field Bus
G G
Hydropower Plant
Process Control Level
ProtectionRelay
GeneratorControllerPLC
Condition
MonitoringDevice
I V f
Process
GeneratorControllerPLC
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3
Local Web server
Local Controlling Computer
Figure 10. Plant level Internet connection.
REFERENCES
[Lin01] Tuomo Lindh, Jero Ahola, Jarmo Partanen, Sauli
Antila, Pertti Jrventausta, Kimmo Kivikko, PekkaVerho, Pekka Ruupunen, Web-based monitoring
functions utilising data management system,DistribuTECH Europe 2001, Berlin, Germany, 6-8
November 2001.
[Aho02] Jero Ahola, Tuomo Lindh, Jarmo Partanen,
Determination of Properties of Low Voltage Power
Cables at Frequency Band 100 kHz 30 MHz ,ICEM 2002, Bruges, Belgium 26-28 August, 2002.