norm obedience in student houses in the partium region
DESCRIPTION
Norm obedience in student houses IN THE Partium region. University of Debrecen, Hungary. Research question. Educational role Explicit and implicit rules and regulations Rules and self - governance Practices. Overview . Partium Institutions - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
NORM OBEDIENCE IN STUDENT HOUSES IN THE PARTIUM REGION
University of Debrecen, Hungary
Research question
Educational role Explicit and implicit rules and
regulations Rules and self-governance Practices
Overview
Partium Institutions Diminishing civil society and self-
governance (Documents analysis)
Social integration (Database analysis)
Conclusion
Partium
16 Student houses + 2 Student hotels
4751 beds 3628 constructed or
reconstructed in the last 10 years
4 Private Public Partnership
University of Debrecen
Services offered
Low service University owns and
runs it student house committee coordinates
Strong self-governance Formal-informal rules
High service University owns, market
oriented firm runs it and the student council coordinates
No self-governance Strict formal rules
How has self-governance disappeared?
Volunteer civil associations
1997-Insufficient publicity2001-Financial support2004-Public places
Social integrity
2009-Political scenes
Document analysisCampus Life
Journal 1984-2011
Analysis of database
Campus-life online database 2010N=4828Weighted in terms of sex, faculty
Growing institutional control
Educational background of residential college students
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Together with parents
Student houses
Renting flats
Own flats
6,2
6,4
5,1
0,5
60,3
60,3
55,4
41,5
33,5
33,4
39,5
58
Parents' educational background
ISCED 1-2 ISCED 2-4 ISCED 5-6
Social integrity of residential college students
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Together with parents
Student houses
Renting flats
Own flats
45,2
47,3
42,6
36,7
54,80
52,70
57,40
63,30
Loneliness
lonely not lonely
Social Integrity-Student lifestyle indicators
Going home
Group participation
Extracurricular activities Activities Places
Attitudes towards values general values professional values academic values
-100 - 100
0 – 100
0 – 100
0 - 100
Scale
Going home-Classification tree77% of the cases classified correctly
16,3% 79,2 %
6,8 % 9,4 % 27,1
% 20,9%
Food
31,2%
Independent lifestyle
Dependent lifestyle
Financially beneficialI meet my
old friends
Yes No Yes
No
?
YesNo
Reciprocity based familiar help
Discriminant analysis: residence50.4% of residential college students,54% of students living with parents predicted correctly
Residence With parents
Renting flats
Student houses Total Exact F Sig. of F to
RemoveWilks'
Lambda
Going home because of physiolgical necessities 2,82 16,54 30,32 16,53 56,52 0,00 0,92
Participation in professional groups 20,04 20,90 25,31 21,87 47,75 0,00 0,90
Parties 27,58 31,53 31,85 30,34 39,58 0,00 0,90
Knowledge orinted academic values 71,07 74,16 74,43 73,23 33,73 0,00 0,89
Going home because of boredom -67,14 -71,98 -66,64 -68,96 29,69 0,00 0,89Physical recreation 50,31 49,40 48,80 49,53 26,70 0,00 0,89Elit cultural events 21,55 22,79 23,19 22,50 24,46 0,00 0,89Digital culture consuming 75,55 76,30 74,66 75,60 22,55 0,00 0,89Pubs 40,76 41,51 42,66 41,59 21,05 0,00 0,89Good students-social behavior 72,95 73,43 76,60 74,17 19,67 0,00 0,89
Going home because of social necessities -18,87 -20,96 -17,61 -19,35 18,54 0,00 0,89
Participation in fan clubs 20,45 19,89 19,22 19,88 17,45 0,00 0,89Participation in culture-oriented or religious groups 71,67 70,34 68,42 70,23 16,56 0,00 0,89
Restaurants, cafes 38,91 40,66 39,19 39,68 15,71 0,01 0,89Social capital oriented 42,07 40,29 40,79 41,01 14,91 0,03 0,89
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Together with parents
Student houses
Renting flats
Own flats
37,3
42,7
42,9
57
34,7
37,5
34,1
18,8
28
19,8
23,1
24,2
Value System
Students commited to academic valuesStudents forced to workSocial capital oriented students
Typology I.: Value preferences
Residential college students’ value preferences
Value preferencesStudents
committed to academic values
N=1743
Students forced to work N=1454
Social capital oriented N=992
Profession oriented work preferences 88,02 82,04 75,96
Carrier oriented work preferences 77,68 77,62 73,13
Society oriented work preferences 73,19 62,78 43,99
Family oriented work preferences 67,84 65,77 64,48
Good students-social behavior 79,50 74,43 64,34
Stressful students-antisocial behavior 31,26 35,93 29,37
Social capital oriented academic values 36,03 42,18 47,98
Knowledge oriented academic values 81,36 72,68 59,91
"Dreamland" general value preferences 90,47 88,49 86,22
Christian values general value preferences 73,78 70,31 62,26
Post-materialist general value preferences 70,29 68,56 63,57
Adult general value preferences 82,23 79,06 72,61
I have to work during my studies -71,42 63,93 -69,07
Discriminant analysis:Loneliness59.7% of lonely and 64.2% of not lonely predicted correctly
Loneliness Not lonely Lonely Total Exact F Sig. of F to Too good student-antisocial
behavior 29,00 36,74 32,43 73,60 0,00
Wellness centres, sport events 31,91 27,94 30,15 63,70 0,00
Family oriented work preferences 67,07 65,42 66,34 55,04 0,00
Restaurants, cafes 40,95 38,04 39,66 47,20 0,00
Going home because of boredom -72,10 -65,35 -69,09 41,82 0,00Going home because of social neccesities -13,91 -26,35 -19,45 40,28 0,00
Knowledge oriented academic values 74,62 71,53 73,25 37,01 0,00
Participation in socially sensitive groups 14,65 16,21 15,34 35,14 0,00
Digital culture consuming 75,81 75,35 75,60 32,78 0,00
Society oriented work preferences 64,44 60,47 62,68 30,89 0,00
Tv watching 60,02 58,49 59,34 28,62 0,01
Participation in fan clubs 19,59 20,21 19,86 26,71 0,02
Conclusion
Coordinating student council and market oriented firms are against self-governance and civil society
Strong institutional regulations
Strong familiar attachments
Stress to meet social, financial and academic expectations
Institutions Students lifestyle
Restructure of social support network is problematicalInsufficient social integrity
Freely accessible equipment: ski and alpinist equipment, sewing mashine, library,
Give place to events: book reviews, clubs, professional meetings
Courses: sewing, guitar, aerobic, classical dance, cooking
Trips Financial support:
Swimming pass, rituals
Strong civil society Events: clubs,
concerts, art and pipe exhibitions, cafes
Rituals: Kun Béla running, Benczúr week
Freely accessible equipment and rooms: table tennis, free copying opportunity
Insignificant rituals
No multi-functional places
No free services No civil society No self-
governance
20111989 Resocialization
processes Financial
cutbacks Cultural forum
1949 - 1989 - 2011
1949 Professionality Community Social
responsibility