north mason school district september 2, 2010. ◦ district 4 th and 5 th grade reading scores are...
TRANSCRIPT
MSP/ HSPE and AYP Results – 2009-2010
North Mason School DistrictSeptember 2, 2010
◦District 4th and 5th grade Reading scores are above statewide scores.
◦District 4th grade Writing scores are also above the statewide scores.
◦District 7th grade Reading proficiency rates increased 45% over last year, compared to statewide increase of 7%.
Improvement & Growth – Reading & Writing
7th grade Math proficiency rates increased by 24% over last year, compared to a statewide increase of 8%
10th grade Science proficiency rates increased by 46% over last year, compared to a statewide increase of 14%
Improvement & Growths – Mathematics & Science
Math & Science◦ New Math Curriculum ◦ “Implementation dip”◦ Science Curriculum Review
Reading ◦ Inconsistently delivered Literacy ◦ Program
Areas of Concern
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 10th
District 67.4 73.6 70.4 54.7 49.7 54.7 69.3
State 72 67.1 69.5 64.5 63.3 69.2 78.8
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
2010 District & State Comparison - Reading
District State
Grade Level
% M
eeti
ng S
tandard
The Scores… Reading
3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 10th
District 55.6 46.5 50 36.6 41.6 32.9 33.5
State 61.7 53.6 53.6 51.8 55.2 51.5 41.6
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
2010 District & State Comparison - Math
District State
Grade Level
% M
eeti
ng S
tandard
The Scores… Math
4th 7th 10th
District 62.5 51.9 77.4
State 61 70.2 85.9
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
2010 District & State Comparison - Writing
District State
Grade Level
% M
eeti
ng S
tandard
The Scores… Writing
5th 8th 10th
District 26.8 32.2 39.8
State 34 54.4 44.7
5
15
25
35
45
55
2010 District & State Comparison - Science
District State
Grade Level
% M
eeti
ng S
tandard
The Scores… Science
New Tests New Standards New Format
Hard to compare Can compare how we tracked with the state
results.
WASL/ MSP/ HSPE Comparison
State Trend Comparison WR 10
10th Grade Writing Students by Level
No Score
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
State Trend Comparison SC 10
10th Grade Science Students by Level
No Score
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
State Trend Comparison RD 7
7th Grade Reading Students by Level
No Score
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
State Trend Comparison RD 4
4th Grade Reading Students by Level
No Score
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
State Trend Comparison WR 4
4th Grade Writing Students by Level
No Score
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Are simply not acceptable
◦ Teams from all schools attended◦ Leadership Team Retreat and demonstrated
commitment to focus on activities that get results.
◦ Administrative support from the Leadership Academy will help us with the hard work ahead.
The Data
MAP Reports◦ Given in 42 states to 2.5 million students◦ NMSD in Grades 2 – 8 Reading and Math
Growth beyond the National Average BERC Evaluations
◦ Identify research-based critical elements of effective teaching and learning (PTL)
◦ 60% Alignment in NMSD Classrooms◦ Recommendations (Thinking, Application &
Relationships)
Other Data to Consider
Requirements:◦Percentage Proficient requirement for
Reading & Math◦95% Test Participation Rate◦9 Groups are disaggregated = 37
categories◦One missed cell means school/ district
does not make AYP◦100% proficient by 2014
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP Cells
Student category
Reading Percent
Proficient
Math Percent
Proficient
Reading 95%
Assessed
Math95%
Assessed
Unexcused Absence
Rate (Elem/Middle)
Graduation Rate(High
School)
All students 1 10 19 28
37 37
American Indian
2 11 20 29
Asian/Pac. Is. 3 12 21 30
Black 4 13 22 31
Hispanic 5 14 23 32
White 6 15 24 33
Disabled 7 16 25 34
LEP 8 17 26 35
Econ. Disadv. 9 18 27 36
What is it?◦ Sanctions for districts and schools receiving
Federal Title I dollars. Who is in it?
◦ District – Year 2◦ Belfair ES – Year 2◦ Sand Hill – Year 3
Secondary schools in NMSD do not receive Title I
School Improvement
◦We Know enough and we Know better.
◦We must respond to the brutal facts with optimism and action.
◦We know from Results NOW, by Mike Schmoker, that - Regular, purposeful collaboration Closing the “Knowing-Doing Gap”
Our Work
Provides a clear vision, and Equips and supports teams Ensures Guaranteed & Viable
Curriculum Monitors PLC’s & Instruction for
results
We know about the Importance of Leadership that . . .