not all scales are created equal...» jackson cubbin scale was more specific for critically ill...

1
JAMIE WYATT, BSN; TODD MILLER, MSN AND NATALIE HURST , BSN, CCRN Problem » Increase in Hospital Acquired Pressure Injury » Current scale not specific to critically ill patients » No standardization of prevention measures used Background » Numerous tools were discovered during a literature review and it was decided that a comparison of the Jackson Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator versus the Braden Scale was to be piloted in the critical care area. » Multiple pressure injury prevention methods were used in critical care area due to knowledge deficit and multiple products offered. » Braden Scale scores varied with rater and experience as a bedside clinician. Goal » Find a pressure injury scale that is sensitive to the critical care population. » Decrease inter-rater variability when assessing skin for risk of pressure injury. » Standardize prevention methods used in critical care. » Decrease hospital acquired pressure injury in critical care. Implementation » Comparative study between Braden Scale and Jackson Cubbin Scale. » Educated bedside clinicians on both Braden Scale and Jackson Cubbin Scale and how to score each category. » Developed standardization of prevention methods for patients at high risk for pressure injury. » Developed flow chart for prevention decisions that was easily accessible to bedside clinicians. Jackson Cubbin Scale Outcomes Conclusion Sensitivity 94.3% 60.1% Specificity 57.6% 93.6% Positive Predicative value 80.1% 90.9% Negative Predicative Value 90% 68.8% » Bedside clinicians indicated that the Jackson Cubbin Scale was more sensitive to the critical care population. » The Jackson Cubbin Scale was more reliable in scoring the patients due to the objectivity of the scale which led to a decrease in inter-rater variability. » Braden Scale presented a larger number of high risk patients which indicated a higher sensitivity » The Braden Scale led to more high false positives and higher risk scores in the critically ill patients. » Jackson Cubbin Scale was more specific for critically ill patients and had a higher positive predictive value. Recommendations » Standardizing pressure injury prevention products and implementing a decision tree for types of prevention products used on high risk patients. » Implement the Jackson Cubbin Scale in critical care areas to aid in identifying and scoring high risk patients for early implementation of prevention methods. Braden Quick Reference Guide References Kyung-Kim, E., Mi-Lee, S., Lee, E. & Eom, M. Comparison of the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales for surgical ICU patients. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007; 26(4):87-94. Jackson, Christine. The revised Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 1999; 15:169-175 Cooper, Karen L. Evidence-Based prevention of pressure ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Nursing. 2013; 33(6):57-66. Acknowledgments A special thanks goes to the following individuals, without whose knowledge, patience and passion for change, this project would not have been possible. » Toni Beymer, MSN, NE-BC » Kelly Miles, MSN, NE-BC » Carolyn Edwards, BSN, MBA, CCRN, NE-BC » Anne Rodgers, BSN WOCN » The entire team at Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center Critical Care Department Admission Photograph all high risk areas such as sacrum and heels. Except for 23 hour observation patients and actively ambulating. High Risk Braden and JC score of <14 or <29 Moderate/Low Risk Braden and JC score of >15 or >30 Prevention Foam dressing to sacrum Heel cups Float all heels on pillows Turn Q 2 If existing pressure injury or developing pressure injury. Consult WOC. Prevention Foam dressing to sacrum Heel cups Float heels on pillows Turn Q 2 If existing pressure injury or developing pressure injury. Consult WOC. Continue to monitor every 12 hours. Specialty Bed Rental Vented > 24 hours Pressor > 24 hours CRRT/IABP/Impella/EVD Malnourished with serum albumin of <2.5 Edematous/ weeping Existing pressure ulcer Hypothermia protocol Bathe all patients with PH balanced soap. Apply PH balanced lotion Barrier cream for all urine incontinence and fecal incontinence. Have MD initiate Skin Care Order set Within 1 hour of admission a Braden and Jackson Cubbin Scale. Pressure Injury Staging Stage 1 Foam dressing and q 2 turning Consult WOC Stage 2 hydrogel, xeroform, foam dressing and q 2 hour turning Consult WOC Stage 3 Wet Wound base Dry gauze, ABD and Medipore tape Consult WOC Dry Wound base NS Wet to Dry gauze, ABD and Medipore tape Consult WOC Stage 4 Same as Stage 3 Consult WOC DTI Foam dressing, q 2 turning and specialty bed. Consult WOC Unstageable Consult WOC Document Braden and JC scores. Document all skin issues.

Upload: others

Post on 22-Feb-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Not All Scales Are Created Equal...» Jackson Cubbin Scale was more specific for critically ill patients and had a higher positive predictive value. Recommendations » Standardizing

Not All Scales Are Created EqualJAMIE WYATT, BSN; TODD MILLER, MSN AND NATALIE HURST , BSN, CCRN

Problem » Increase in Hospital Acquired Pressure Injury

» Current scale not specific to critically ill patients

» No standardization of prevention measures used

Background » Numerous tools were discovered during a

literature review and it was decided that a comparison of the Jackson Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator versus the Braden Scale was to be piloted in the critical care area.

» Multiple pressure injury prevention methods were used in critical care area due to knowledge deficit and multiple products offered.

» Braden Scale scores varied with rater and experience as a bedside clinician.

Goal » Find a pressure injury scale that is sensitive to the

critical care population.

» Decrease inter-rater variability when assessing skin for risk of pressure injury.

» Standardize prevention methods used in critical care.

» Decrease hospital acquired pressure injury in critical care.

Implementation » Comparative study between Braden Scale and Jackson Cubbin Scale.

» Educated bedside clinicians on both Braden Scale and Jackson Cubbin Scale and how to score each category.

» Developed standardization of prevention methods for patients at high risk for pressure injury.

» Developed flow chart for prevention decisions that was easily accessible to bedside clinicians.

Jackson Cubbin ScaleOutcomes

Conclusion

Sensitivity94.3% 60.1%

Specificity57.6% 93.6%

Positive Predicative value80.1% 90.9%

Negative Predicative Value90% 68.8%

» Bedside clinicians indicated that the Jackson Cubbin Scale was more sensitive to the critical care population.

» The Jackson Cubbin Scale was more reliable in scoring the patients due to the objectivity of the scale which led to a decrease in inter-rater variability.

» Braden Scale presented a larger number of high risk patients which indicated a higher sensitivity

» The Braden Scale led to more high false positives and higher risk scores in the critically ill patients.

» Jackson Cubbin Scale was more specific for critically ill patients and had a higher positive predictive value.

Recommendations » Standardizing pressure injury prevention products

and implementing a decision tree for types of prevention products used on high risk patients.

» Implement the Jackson Cubbin Scale in critical care areas to aid in identifying and scoring high risk patients for early implementation of prevention methods.

Braden Quick Reference Guide

References

Kyung-Kim, E., Mi-Lee, S., Lee, E. & Eom, M. Comparison of the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales for surgical ICU patients. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007; 26(4):87-94.

Jackson, Christine. The revised Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Area Risk Calculator. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 1999; 15:169-175

Cooper, Karen L. Evidence-Based prevention of pressure ulcers in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Nursing. 2013; 33(6):57-66.

AcknowledgmentsA special thanks goes to the following individuals, without whose knowledge, patience and passion for change, this project would not have been possible.

» Toni Beymer, MSN, NE-BC » Kelly Miles, MSN, NE-BC

» Carolyn Edwards, BSN, MBA, CCRN, NE-BC » Anne Rodgers, BSN WOCN

» The entire team at Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center Critical Care Department

Admission

Photograph all high risk areas such as sacrum and heels.

Except for 23 hour observation patients and actively ambulating.

High Risk

Braden and JC score of <14

or <29

Moderate/Low Risk

Braden and JC score of >15 or

>30

Prevention

Foam dressing to sacrum Heel cups Float all heels on pillows Turn Q 2 If existing pressure injury or

developing pressure injury. Consult WOC.

Prevention

Foam dressing to sacrum Heel cups Float heels on pillows Turn Q 2 If existing pressure injury or

developing pressure injury. Consult WOC.

Continue to monitor every 12

hours.

Specialty Bed Rental

Vented > 24 hours Pressor > 24 hours CRRT/IABP/Impella/EVD Malnourished with serum

albumin of <2.5 Edematous/ weeping Existing pressure ulcer Hypothermia protocol

Bathe all patients with PH balanced soap.

Apply PH balanced lotion

Barrier cream for all urine incontinence and fecal incontinence.

Have MD initiate Skin Care Order set

Within 1 hour of admission a Braden and Jackson Cubbin Scale.

Pressure Injury Staging

Stage 1 Foam dressing and q 2 turning

Consult WOC

Stage 2 hydrogel, xeroform, foam dressing and q 2

hour turning Consult WOC

Stage 3

Wet Wound base Dry gauze, ABD and Medipore tape

Consult WOC Dry Wound base

NS Wet to Dry gauze, ABD and Medipore tape

Consult WOC

Stage 4 Same as Stage 3

Consult WOC

DTI Foam dressing, q 2 turning and specialty

bed. Consult WOC

Unstageable Consult WOC

Document Braden and JC scores. Document all skin issues.