notes on decision tree analysis university of chicago graduate school of business introduction to...

23
Notes on Decision Tree Analysis University of Chicago Graduate School of Business Introduction to Computer Based Models Bus-36102-81 Mr. Schrage Spring 2003

Upload: thomas-murphy

Post on 26-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Notes on Decision Tree Analysis

University of ChicagoGraduate School of Business

Introduction to Computer Based Models Bus-36102-81Mr. Schrage Spring 2003

Decision Trees and Decision Analysis

Environment: - A strategic decision must be made,

- Number of alternatives is small.

- Uncertainty plays a key role.

Examples:

Go/No-go decisions on a

-New product, process, or plant.

Why Do It Carefully?

- We are not good at computing probabilities,

e.g., combinations of events.

- We are careless in proposing subjective probabilities.

- We under-enumerate possible scenarios.

What Are Decision Trees?

It is a methodology for

1) Displaying the alternatives in a sequential decision problem.

2) Calculating expected values of the various alternatives.

a) Simple case:

All probabilities about future events are given.

b) More complex:

New information about future probabilities can be bought,

e.g., by market research, testing, clinical trials, etc.

Example

(Based on an example of Gary Eppen)

We are about to introduce a new line of garden tractors.

How much money should we spend on marketing?

A very reasonable simplification is that there are three levels of marketing effort we could use:

Aggressive

Basic

Cautious

Similarly, the market/economy has two possible outcomes:

Strong or Weak.

Example:

So take the BASIC strategy and hope for a Strong market.

Note: We have assumed:

Linear utility, e.g., we are indifferent between:

.95 probability of a $1000 loss, and

.01 probability of a $95,000 loss.

That’s OK if this is one of many projects in a large firm…

So,

Prob{ market is strong, given study is encouraging}

= .270/.435 = .621

Prob{ market is weak | study is encouraging}

= .165/.435 = .379 ( = 1 - .621)

Prob { strong | discouraging} = .180/ .565 = .318

Prob{ weak | discouraging} = .385/.565 = .682

Sensitivity of Posterior Probabilities to Prior Probabilities

Prior Posterior

P(S) P(S|E) P(S|D) 0 0 0 .1 .18 .06 .2 .33 .13 .3 .46 .20 .4 .57 .28

.45 .621 .318 .5 .67 .36 .6 .75 .46

.7 .82 .57 .8 .89 .70 .9 .95 .84 1 1 1

Policy:

Make the study;

If it is encouraging, then take the Aggressive strategy.

If it is discouraging, then be Cautious.

The value of the study is $12.96M - $12.85M = $110,000

in excess of its cost.

Other Examples: Testing for HIV

ELISA test if very “sensitive”,

Prob{test negative | have HIV} .0001

Prob{test positive | not have HIV} .01;

Western Blot test is very “specific”,

Prob{test negative | have HIV} .001

Prob{test positive | not have HIV} .0001;

Western blot is expensive. About 1 in 300 people in U.S. are HIV positive.When should you use which test?

Example: Checking for Breast Cancer

Mammogram: Cost > $100;

60 out of 1000 women over 40 test positive on mammogram.

In fact 2.7 out of 1000 over 40 having mammogram have cancer.

Biopsy: Cost > $2000;

Essentially an exact test.

Should insurance be required to cover mammograms for women over age X?

Example: Spouse Battery and Homicide

O. J. Simpson was known to have battered his wife. She was murdered. What is the probability that O.J. did it?

Alan Dershowitz: FBI statistics show that out of 4M incidents of partner battery in 1992, there followed 1432 homicides by the partner. A 36 in 100,000 chance of subsequent murder provides essentially no support for the contention that O.J. did it.

Is Alan correct?

Other Federal statistics: In 1993, 5 out of 100,000 women were murdered by someone.

What is the relevant question?