nothing to disclose reducing the impact of low- acuity ed visits - ihi home...
TRANSCRIPT
Reducing the Impact of Low-Acuity ED Visits
Cambridge, MA
Presenter has
nothing to disclose
Kedar S. Mate, MD
November 1, 2016
Objectives
• Describe strategies for reducing the impact of low-acuity ED visits
• Understand how the creation and expansion of less costly, more
convenient, alternatives to ED visits can reduce diversions,
overcrowding, and waits and delays.
• Describe examples where there has been success in relocating ED
care to the right place, at the right time, for the right reason
Agenda
• Context – Policy Landscape
• Business case discussion
• Theory of change for reducing impact of low-
acuity ED visits
• Examples from the field
Overall ED Utilization in US
• 136.3 million visits (44.5 visits per 100 persons)
– 40.2 million injury related visits
• 16.2 million (11.9%) visits resulting in hospital
admission
• 2.1 million visits resulting in admission to critical
care unit
• 27% seen in less than 15 minutes
• 2.1% of visits resulting in transfer to different
hospital
National Hospital Ambulatory Medicare Care Survey: CDC
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/emergency-department.htm
Impact of ACA
• ED care and primary/preventive services are 2
of the 10 “essential benefits”
In theory, this may:
+ Increase use of emergency services
+ Increase primary & preventive services
- Leading to lower use of emergency services
Impact of ACA
• ED care and primary/preventive services are 2
of the 10 “essential benefits”
In theory, this may:
+ Increase use of emergency services
+ Increase primary & preventive services
- Leading to lower use of emergency services
↑
↑
?
Massachusetts
• Health care reform law in 2006 providing
coverage to nearly all residents
• Preventable ED visits reduced 5-8% for non-
urgent or primary care ED visits relative to other
states.(1)
• Between 2006-2010 ED visits and non-urgent
visits dropped 1.9 and 3.8% respectively.(2)
1. Miller, Sarah (June 2012). "The Effect of Insurance on Emergency Room Visits: An Analysis of the 2006 Massachusetts Health
Reform)"(PDF).
2. Long, Sharon K; Karen Stockley; Heather Dahlen (January 2012). "Massachusetts Health Reforms: Uninsurance Remains Low,
Self-Reported Health Status Improves As State Prepares To Tackle Costs“
Impact of ACA
• ED care and primary/preventive services are 2
of the 10 “essential benefits”
In theory, this may:
+ Increase use of emergency services
+ Increase primary & preventive services
- Leading to lower use of emergency services
↑
↑
↓
Avoidable ED Visits
• Most studies classify between 30-50% of all ED visits as non-urgent and potentially avoidable (up to 67m visits)
• Up to $38b in wasteful spending (1-2)
• 71% of 6.5 million ED visits (2010) made by commercially insured patients were for causes that do not require immediate attention in the ED, or are preventable with proper outpatient care. (3)
1. Weinick R, Billings J, Thorpe J, Ambulatory care sensitive emergency department visits: a national perspective, Abstr
AcademyHealth Meet, 2003;20(abstr no. 8):525-526
2. Uscher-Pines, Lori, et al. "Deciding to visit the emergency department for non-urgent conditions: A systematic review of the
literature." The American journal of managed care 19.1 (2013): 47.
3 Truven Health Analytics (formerly the healthcare business of Thomson Reuters) J. Roderick, Inc. Brian Erni, 631-584-2200 \
Defining “low-acuity” by ESIDegree of
Acuity
Level of
Acuity
Patient Condition/Description
High LEVEL 1
EMERGENT
Patients in this category require immediate attention
with maximal utilization of resources to prevent loss
of life, limb, or eyesight.
LEVEL 2
URGENT
Patients in this category should be seen by a
physician because of high risk for rapid deterioration,
loss of life, limb, or eyesight if treatment or
interventions are delayed.
Medium LEVEL 3
ACUTE
Patients who develop a sudden illness or injury within
24-48 hours. Symptoms and risk factors for serious
disease do not indicate a likelihood of rapid
deterioration in the near future.
Low LEVEL 4
ROUTINE
Patients with chronic complaints, medical
maintenance, or medical conditions posing no threat
to loss of life, limb, or eyesight.
LEVEL 5
ROUTINE
Patients in this category are currently stable and
require no resources such as labs or x-ray.
Business case for reducing low-acuity
visits works when…
• The health care system takes on financial risk
for patients (fully value-based or global
payment)
• Safety net (or similar) system serving primarily
uninsured and Medicaid patients
• Any system with a severe supply-demand
mismatch
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Changing Primary Care
• After-hours telephone consultation: reduced
‘inappropriate ED visits’ from 41% to 8% (1)
• Extend practice hours: adding night and weekend
hours reduced ED visits 8% over 18 mths (2)
• Open access scheduling: offers same-day services
to patients
• Group visits/shared appointments: 2-year RCT with
chronic-ill geriatric pts found 17% decrease ED use
(3)
• Make primary care available on work-site
1. Franco SM, Mitchell CK, Buzon RM. Primary care physician access and gatekeeping: a key to reducing emergency department
use. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997 Feb;36(2):63-8.
2. Neighborhood Health Plan, Unpublished findings.
3. Coleman EA, Eilertsen TB, Kramer AM, Magid DJ, Beck A, Conner D. Reducing emergency visits in older adults with chronic
illness. A randomized, controlled trial of group visits. Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Mar-Apr;4(2):49-57.
Effects of Primary care changes
• Broaden Access to Primary Care Services through Medical and Health Homes– Community Care of North Carolina reduced ED visit
rate by 16% for asthma, total savings to Medicaid and CHIP of $135m
• Focus on Frequent ED Users – “Super Utilizers”– Ambulatory Clinic on Site at ED
– Hennepin County Medical Center’s ambulatory ICU clinic observed a 38% decrease in ED visits and 25% decrease in hospitalizations in year
– Medicaid Health Homes that leverage community interventions for super-utilizers
Source: Department of Health and Human Services, January 2014
Effects of Primary care changes
• Target needs of people with behavioral health
problems
– 12.5% of all ED visits are for BH needs across all
payers
• Current situation:
– Fragmented, subpar care for those suffering co-
morbid behavioral health issues
– Overcrowding, trouble allocating scarce ED resources
for all
Source: Department of Health and Human Services, January 2014
And MA Health Policy Commission
Improve primary care for BH
• Medical homes for people with substance abuse
problems– WellPoint Health in Indiana decreased ED utilization by 72%
and decreased controlled substance prescriptions by 38%
• Housing and case management– In Illinois, patients in housing program decreased ED use by
24%
– In New York, mobile health clinics and case management
decreased ED use by 20%
– In Pennsylvania, patient navigators worked with patients with
severe mental illness and reported 59% reduction in ED use
Source: Department of Health and Human Services, January 2014
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Urgent care & retail clinics
• # visits grew 4x between
07-09
• >90% of visits for 10
primary conditions
(sinusitis, URIs, UTI, HTN
immunizations etc)
• Same 10 conditions make
up 12% of ED visits
Mehrotra, Ateev, et al. "Retail clinics, primary care physicians, and emergency departments: a comparison of patients’ visits." Health
Affairs27.5 (2008): 1272-1282.
Mehrotra, Ateev, and Judith R. Lave. "Visits to retail clinics grew fourfold from 2007 to 2009, although their share of overall outpatient
visits remains low." Health Affairs 31.9 (2012): 2123-2129.
Urgent care & retail clinics
Retail clinics, primary care physicians, and emergency departments: a comparison of patients’ visits
A Mehrotra, MC Wang, JR Lave, JL Adams… - Health Affairs, 2008
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Community Paramedicine Model
• Primary healthcare extension
• Substitution
• Community coordination
Blacker, N., Pearson, L., & Walker, T. (2009). Redesigning paramedic models of care to meet rural and remote community needs.
The 10th National Rural Health Conference, Cairns, Australia, May 17-20, 2009.
Lapert, A, Morganti, K.G., Margolis, G.S., Wasserman, J. & Kellerman, A.L. (2013, December). Giving EMS flexibility in transporting
low-acuity patients could generate substantial Medicare savings. Health Affairs, 32(12). 2142-2148.
Community Paramedicine
• 911 Nurse Triage - Low acuity 911 callers referred to a
trained RN who helps patient find appropriate resources
for their medical issue.
– 37% of 4,422 low-acuity 911 callers re-directed away from ED;
~$1.9 million saved
• EMS “Loyalty” Program - Patients who use 911 15+
times in 90 days enrolled for EMS provided home visits,
home-based care.
– 302 patients with pre- & post- data show 51.8% lower ED visits,
462 hospital admissions avoided, ~$8.1 million saved
http://www.medstar911.org/mobile-healthcare-programs
Other latent opportunities…Jersey
Source: Emma Stanton, South London and
Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Jersey Post
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Telemedicine
• Immediate access to caregivers
• Mainly used to reach rural places with complex interventions (e.gtelestroke)
• 28% of all peds ED visits could have been avoided (1)
• Decreased ED use by CHF patients by 33% (2)
• 29% decrease in ED use by geriatric patients in cohort-controlled study of senior living centers (3)
1. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/story/1978/telemedicine-could-eradicate-many-expensive-ed-visits.aspx
2. Lehmann, Craig A., Nancy Mintz, and Jean Marie Giacini. "Impact of telehealth on healthcare utilization by congestive heart failure
patients."Disease Management & Health Outcomes 14.3 (2006): 163-169.
3. Shah, Manish N., et al. "High-intensity telemedicine decreases emergency department use for ambulatory care sensitive
conditions by older adult senior living community residents." Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 16.12 (2015):
1077-1081.
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Financing Strategies (1)
• The strategy: Increase co-pay for ED visit; Maintain or lower co-pay for OP visit
• Findings:– Dose response (1)
– Increase ED co-pay $20-35; decrease visits 12%
– Increase ED co-pay $50-100; decrease visits 23%
• Limitations:– May deter patients from seeking needed care
1. Hsu J, Price M, Brand R, Ray GT, Fireman B, Newhouse JP, Selby JV. Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical
events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study. Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1801-20.
2. Journal of Managed Care Medicine
3. Others include Lowe 2008, Lowe 2010, Mortensen 2010
Henry Ford HMO (2) 2004 2005-2006
Copayment $0 $10-40 $50 $75 $100-$150
Non-emergent ED use Baseline -11% -42% -51% -62%
Financing Strategies (2)
• The strategy: Financially incent or penalize PCPs by measured rates of avoidable ED utilization
• Findings:– Blue Care Network of Michigan HMO (217,298 members)
– PCPs in different risk sharing arrangements for ED utilization.
– Compared to low or no risk:– PCPs at “medium risk” – members’ ED use decreased 33 visits per
1000 pts
– PCPs at “higher risk” – members’ ED use decreased 51 visits per 1000 pts
• Limitations:– May deter physicians from prescribing needed care
Relationship between primary care physician financial risk and member emergency department use in commercial HMO population,
The American Journal of Managed Care, June 2006
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Zocchi, Mark S., Mark S. McClelland, and Jesse M. Pines. "Increasing Throughput: Results from a 42-Hospital Collaborative to
Improve Emergency Department Flow." The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 41.12 (2015): 532-553.
Non-acute care in the ED
• Fast-track non-life threatening conditions
– Reduced waiting time by 51 min; LOS by 28 min;
LWBS 4%
• Provide urgent care in separate space
– In 2011/12 the NHS Institute developed ambulatory
care model in ED
– Converted emergency admissions into “same day”
emergency episodes
– Reduced avoidable admissions
1. Sanchez, Miquel, et al. "Effects of a fast-track area on emergency department performance." The Journal of emergency
medicine 31.1 (2006): 117-120.
2. National Health Service, Ambulatory Emergency Care: Delivering same day emergency service, 2011
Clinical
Status >>
Acute Care
Services
are
Needed for
Moderately
-Ill Older
Adults
Triage Moderately-ill Older Adults by:
• Diagnosis and Treatment Needed
• Payment for Home-based Acute Care Services
Enhanced Assessment:
• Specific Home-care Needs
• Patient / Family Caregiver Capabilities & Competencies
• Patient Preferences
Selection of Home-based Care Services
(Asset map of Home-based Acute Care Services)
Transition Older Adults from the ED to Home-based Acute Care Services
• FU Care Arranged
• Real-time Handover Communications
Activate Home-based Acute Care Services
Evaluate and Review Outcomes for the Entire Episode
(from ED to Home-based Acute Care to Discharge)
Transition of Older Adults from the ED
to Home-based Acute Care Services
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
• Northeast's largest nonprofit independent multi-
specialty medical group.
• Serves 675,000 patients across eastern
Massachusetts
• Early pioneer of population health & ACO
models
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Atrius Health: Program components
• Most practice are at level 3 NCQA PCMH certification
• Largest out-patient Behavioral Health department among physician practices in the Massachusetts
• Population managers who provide outreach services to improve outcomes
• Case managers and care facilitators who are assigned to keep high risk patients out of the hospital when appropriate
• Clinical pharmacists who do academic detailing to lower drug costs in general and manage medication for specific patients
• 24 x 7 telephone access to advanced practice clinicians and weekend/holiday urgent care
• Strong IT interoperability with preferred hospital partners
• Advanced use of electronic medical record with sophisticated data warehouse and analytics
Atrius Health: Results
• Medicaid: 37% fewer Emergency Room visits
• Medicare Advantage: 12% fewer Emergency Room visits, 5% fewer SNF admits
• Commercial PPO: 25% fewer Emergency Room visits
• Commercial HMO: 8% fewer inpatient admits
• Since 2012, Washington State has grappled with
curbing overutilization in the ED
• Started partnership between Washington State
Hospital Association, WA College of Emergency
Physicians and WA Medical Association that led
to the ER is for Emergencies program
• Aims to reduce overutilization of the ED and to
address narcotic drug-seeking behaviors.
Successful Acute Care Payment Reform Requires Working With the Emergency Department, Health Affairs Blog, May 2015
http://www.wsha.org/quality-safety/projects/er-is-for-emergencies/
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Washington’s “ER is for Emergencies”
• The ER is for Emergencies interventions include:– Narcotics guidelines and prescription drug monitoring
– Educating patients about appropriate use of EDs
– Identifying frequent users of ED and prehospital care and creating care plans
– Feedback of information to hospitals
• In its first year, estimated results for state Medicaid include:– Savings of more than $34 million
– ED visits decreased by nearly 9.9%
– Low acuity visits decreased by 14.2%
– Rate of frequent visitors (5+ visits) dropped 10.7%
Successful Acute Care Payment Reform Requires Working With the Emergency Department, Health Affairs Blog, May 2015
http://www.wsha.org/quality-safety/projects/er-is-for-emergencies/
Driver diagram
Reduce the impact of low-acuity ED visits
Prevent low-acuity patients from coming to the ED in the
first place
Change Primary Care
Urgent Care & Retail clinics
Community Paramedicine & others
Telemedicine
Financing strategies
Improve Management of
low-acuity patients who have come to
the ED
Non-acute care in ED (fast track, urgent care, observation)
Clinical pathways & standard orders
Transition from ED to home
Open questions
• Which elements of the driver diagram are you
working on?
• What are you working on that is missing from the
driver diagram?
• How are you making the business/value case for
reducing low-acuity visits?
Thank You!
Kedar S. Mate, MD
Chief Innovation & Education OfficerInstitute for Healthcare Improvement
20 University Road, 7th Floor
Cambridge, MA
Department of Medicine
Weill Cornell Medical College
@KedarMate