notice of electronic filing - chicagojusticeproject...cpd also stated that under section 3(g) the...

53
E-Notice To: Matthew Vincent Topic [email protected] 2018-CH-06576 CALENDAR: 10 NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS The transmission was received on 05/22/2018 at 1:42 PM and was ACCEPTED with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County on 05/22/2018 at 2:11 PM. CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT vs. CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT DOROTHY BROWN CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COOK COUNTY RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER, ROOM 1001 CHICAGO, IL 60602 (312) 603-5031 [email protected] Filer's Email: [email protected] Filer's Fax: (312) 243-5902 Notice Date: 5/22/2018 2:11:48 PM Total Pages: 50 CHANCERY_ACTION_COVER_SHEET (CHANCERY DIVISION) COMPLAINT

Upload: others

Post on 30-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

E-Notice

To: Matthew Vincent Topic

[email protected]

2018-CH-06576

CALENDAR: 10

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

The transmission was received on 05/22/2018 at 1:42 PM and was ACCEPTED withthe Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County on 05/22/2018 at 2:11 PM.

CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT vs. CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT

DOROTHY BROWN

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

COOK COUNTY

RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER, ROOM 1001

CHICAGO, IL 60602

(312) 603-5031

[email protected]

Filer's Email: [email protected]

Filer's Fax: (312) 243-5902

Notice Date: 5/22/2018 2:11:48 PM

Total Pages: 50

CHANCERY_ACTION_COVER_SHEET (CHANCERY DIVISION)

COMPLAINT

Page 2: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

[email protected]@loevy.com

IN THE CIRCUIT CIVIL COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

No.v.

Plantiff

Defendant

CHANCERY DIVISION CIVIL COVER SHEET

COUNTY DEPARTMENT, COUNTY DIVISION

GENERAL CHANCERY SECTION

A Chancery Division Civil Cover Sheet - General Chancery Section shall be fi led with the initial complaint in all

actions fi led in the General Chancery Section of Chancery Division. The information contained herein is for administra-tive purposes only. Please check the box in front of the appropriate category which best characterizes your action beingfiled.

By: /s MATTHEW VINCENT TOPIC

0005 Administrative Review

0001 Class ActionDeclaratory Judgment0002Injunction0004

General Chancery0007Accounting0010Arbitration0011Certiorari0012Dissolution of Corporation0013Dissolution of Partnership0014Equitable Lien0015Interpleader0016Mandamus0017Ne Exeat0018

Partition0019Quiet Title0020Quo Warranto0021Redemption Rights0022Reformation of a Contract0023Rescission of a Contract0024Specific Performance0025Trust Construction0026

Other (specify)

CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT

Name:

Address:

Atty. for:

Telephone:

City/State/Zip:

41295

LOEVY & LOEVY

CHICAGO, IL 60607311 N ABERDEEN 3FL

(312) 243-5900

0027 Foreign Transcript

0085 Petition to Register Foreign Judgment

Atty. No.: Pro Se 99500Clerk's Office Electronic Notice Policy

Pro Se Only: I have read and agree to the terms of the

and choose to opt

in to electronic notice from the Clerk’s office for this caseatthis email address:

Primary Email Address:[email protected] Email Address(es):

CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT

CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT

Chancery Division Civil Cover Sheet - General Chancery Section (Rev. 12/30/15) CCCH 0623

DOROTHY BROWN, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOISPage 1 of 1

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576CALENDAR: 10

CIRCUIT COURT OFCOOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

CHANCERY DIVISIONCLERK DOROTHY BROWN

Page 3: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ) ) Defendant. )

COMPLAINT

NOW COMES Plaintiff, CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT by its undersigned attorneys,

LOEVY & LOEVY, and brings this suit to overturn Defendant CHICAGO POLICE

DEPARTMENT’s refusal, in willful violation of the Illinois Freedom of Information Act, to

produce records related to various CPD reports and CPD data. In support of its Complaint, CJP

states as follows:

INTRODUCTION

1. Pursuant to the fundamental philosophy of the American constitutional form of

government, it is the public policy of the State of Illinois that all persons are entitled to full and

complete information regarding the affairs of government and the official acts and policies of

those who represent them as public officials and public employees consistent with the terms of

the Illinois Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). 5 ILCS 140/1.

2. Restraints on access to information, to the extent permitted by FOIA, are limited

exceptions to the principle that the people of this state have a right to full disclosure of

information relating to the decisions, policies, procedures, rules, standards, and other aspects of

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM5/22/2018 1:42 PM5/22/2018 1:42 PM5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-065762018-CH-065762018-CH-065762018-CH-06576CALENDAR: 10

PAGE 1 of 49CIRCUIT COURT OF

COOK COUNTY, ILLINOISCHANCERY DIVISION

CLERK DOROTHY BROWN

Page 4: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

- 2 -

government activity that affect the conduct of government and the lives of the people. 5 ILCS

140/1.

3. All public records of a public body are presumed to be open to inspection or

copying. Any public body that asserts that a record is exempt from disclosure has the burden of

proving by clear and convincing evidence that it is exempt. 5 ILCS 140/3.

4. Under FOIA Section 11(h), “except as to causes the court considers to be of

greater importance, proceedings arising under [FOIA] shall take precedence on the docket over

all other causes and be assigned for hearing and trial at the earliest practicable date and expedited

in every way.”

PARTIES

5. Plaintiff CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT is the FOIA requester in this case.

6. Defendant CPD is a public body located in Cook County, Illinois.

JUNE 14 REQUEST (ARREST DATA)

7. On June 14, 2017, CJP requested individual arrest data for every arrest made by

CPD from 1999-2016. Group Exhibit A.

8. On June 20, 2017, CPD denied the request stating that under Section 3(g) the

burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Group Exhibit A.

9. The burden of compliance does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure.

MAY 25 REQUEST (BROMWICH REPORT)

10. On May 25, 2017, CJP requested Michael Bromwich’s report on CPD training

completed in 2016 and “all invoices, cancelled checks, contracts, work orders, and any other

financial documents that in any way are related to” Bromwich’s work for CPD. Group Exhibit

B.

11. On June 9, 2017, CPD denied the request stating that the Bromwich report is

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 2

of

49

Page 5: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

- 3 -

exempt under Section 7(1)(m) because the record was prepared at the request of an attorney.

CPD stated that it does not maintain the records responsive to the remainder of the request.

Group Exhibit B.

SEPTEMBER 26 REQUEST (COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS)

12. On September 26, 2016, CJP requested the comprehensive analysis that CPD

official referenced in a September 21, 2016, briefing with alderman at City Hall. CJP also

requested all records that CPD maintains regarding staffing or allocation of CPD resources from

January 1, 2011, to September 26, 2016. Ex. C.

13. On October 4, 2016, CPD took a five day extension. Ex. D.

14. Despite follow up communications from CJP, CPD never responded and never

produced any responsive records. Ex. E.

JANUARY 20 REQUEST (CRIME INCIDENT DATA)

15. On January 20, 2017, CJP requested “case level crime incident data for all crime

incidents including homicides from 1980-2016 including data related to how the incident is

originally coded as it enters the CPD and the final incident classification.” Ex. F.

16. On January 27, 2017, CPD took a five day extension. Ex. G.

17. On February 3, 2017, CPD denied the request stating that it would need to create

an algorithm to gather the responsive data and this constituted creating a new record. CPD also

stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in

disclosure. Ex. H.

18. On February 18, 2017, CJP narrowed the request to the time period 1999-2016.

Ex. I.

19. CPD did not respond to the narrowed request and did not produce responsive

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

of

49

Page 6: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

- 4 -

records.

FEBRUARY 17 REQUEST (DV DATABASE)

20. On February 17, 2017, CJP requested “the database records related to domestic

violence that were provided to ABC Chicago News and are reported on in this news report: [url

to report].” Group Exhibit J.

21. CPD never responded to the request or produced any responsive records. Group

Exhibit J.

DECEMBER 19 REQUEST (EMAILS)

22. On December 19, 2017, CJP requested emails (from seven listed

positions/individuals) related to Superintendent Eddie Johnson’s announcement on September,

21, 2016, that CPD would hire 1,000 more police officers. Group Exhibit K.

23. On December 20, 2017, CPD responded that it needed complete names despite

the fact that CJP had listed the exact positions it requested emails from. Group Exhibit K.

24. CPD never produced the responsive records. Group Exhibit K.

SEPTEMBER 11 REQUEST (HIRES & ACADEMY)

25. On September 11, 2017, CJP requested records related to the number of people

CPD hired and the number of people that went through CPD’s academy. Group Exhibit L.

26. On September 11, 2017, CPD took a five day extension. Group Exhibit L.

27. CPD never produced the responsive records.

JUNE 23 REQUEST (OEMC CALL FOR SERVICE DATA)

28. On June 23, 2017, CJP requested “all call level police call for service data

originally created by the Office of Emergency Management and Communications, but

maintained by the Chicago Police Department for the years 1999-2016.” Ex. M.

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 4

of

49

Page 7: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

- 5 -

29. On June 30, 2017, CPD responded stating that it does not possess records

responsive to the request. Ex. N.

APRIL 10 REQUEST (STAFFING)

30. On April 10, 2017, CJP requested records related to staffing by district for

January 1st of each year for the years 2000-2017. Ex. O.

31. After additional correspondence, on May 2, 2017, CPD responded that it only

possessed responsive data going back to 2008. Ex. P.

32. On May 24, 2017, CPD produced responsive records for 2008-2017, but not

2000-2007 stating that it did not possess the responsive records for 2000-2007. Ex. Q.

FEBRUARY 24 REQUEST (IAD DATA)

33. On February 24, 2018, CJP requested various records related to digital complaint

data received by Internal Affairs Division from 2000-2017. Ex. R.

34. After additional correspondence, on April 5, 2018, CPD responded largely

denying the request and stating that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the

public interest in disclosure for part of the request. CPD stated that it did not possess some of the

other records requested and it produced a small portion of responsive records. Ex. S.

35. The burden of compliance does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure.

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 5

of

49

Page 8: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

- 6 -

COUNT I – JUNE 14 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

36. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

37. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

38. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

39. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

COUNT II – MAY 25 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

40. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

41. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

42. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

43. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

COUNT III – SEPTEMBER 26 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

44. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

45. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

46. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

47. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

COUNT IV – JANUARY 20 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

48. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

49. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

50. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

51. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 6

of

49

Page 9: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

- 7 -

requested records.

COUNT V – FEBRUARY 17 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

52. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

53. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

54. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

55. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

COUNT VI – DECEMBER 19 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

56. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

57. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

58. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

59. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

COUNT VII – SEPTEMBER 11 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

60. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

61. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

62. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

63. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

COUNT VIII – JUNE 23 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

64. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

65. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

66. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 7

of

49

Page 10: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

- 8 -

67. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

COUNT IX – APRIL 10 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

68. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

69. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

70. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

71. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

COUNT XI – FEBRUARY 24 WILLFUL VIOLATION OF FOIA

72. The above paragraphs are incorporated by reference.

73. CPD is a public body under FOIA.

74. The records sought in the FOIA request are non-exempt public records of CPD.

75. CPD has willfully and intentionally violated FOIA by refusing to produce the

requested records.

WHEREFORE, CJP asks that the Court:

i. in accordance with FOIA Section 11(f), afford this case precedence on the Court’s

docket except as to causes the Court considers to be of greater importance, assign

this case for hearing and trial at the earliest practicable date, and expedite this

case in every way;

ii. declare that CPD has violated FOIA;

iii. order CPD to produce the requested records;

iv. enjoin CPD from withholding non-exempt public records under FOIA;

v. order CPD to pay civil penalties;

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 8

of

49

Page 11: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

- 9 -

vi. award Plaintiff reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs;

vii. award such other relief the Court considers appropriate.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ Joshua Hart Burday

____________________________

Attorneys for Plaintiff CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT

Matthew Topic Joshua Burday LOEVY & LOEVY 311 North Aberdeen, 3rd Floor Chicago, IL 60607 312-243-5900 [email protected] [email protected] Atty. No. 41295

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 9

of

49

Page 12: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Group Exhibit A

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 10 of 49

Page 13: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 11 of 49

Page 14: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 12 of 49

Page 15: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 13 of 49

Page 16: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Group Exhibit B

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 14 of 49

Page 17: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 15 of 49

Page 18: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit C

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 16 of 49

Page 19: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit D

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 17 of 49

Page 20: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 18 of 49

Page 21: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit E

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 19 of 49

Page 22: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit F

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 20 of 49

Page 23: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit G

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 21 of 49

Page 24: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit HELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 22 of 49

Page 25: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 23 of 49

Page 26: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit I

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 24 of 49

Page 27: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Group Exhibit J

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 25 of 49

Page 28: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 26 of 49

Page 29: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Group Exhibit K

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 27 of 49

Page 30: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 28 of 49

Page 31: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

From: Tracy Siska [email protected]: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17

Date: September 11, 2017 at 11:05 AMTo: Chicago Police Department, Dept: Records & Inquiry [email protected]

Please provide the following records in accordance with the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

A. "Please provide aggregate totals for the following categories broken down by month for every month since 1/1/16 - through 8/31/17. Please further break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of officers hired by the Chicago Police Department

2. Number of cadets entering the Chicago Police Department academy

3. Number of cadets graduating from the Chicago Police Department academy

4. Number of officers retiring from the Chicago Police Department

5. Number of officers that left the employ of the Chicago Police Department for any reason besides retirement

B. For every entrance exam given by the Chicago Police Department from 1/1/16 - 8/31/17 please detail the following aggregate totals: Please further break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of individuals that applied to take the exam

2. Number of individuals that completed the exam

3. Number of individuals that passed the exam

4. Number of individuals that attempted each qualifying test, i.e. the psychological exam, POWER test, etc…., and the number ofindividuals that both failed and passed the exam.

Please fulfill this request in the 5 working days mandated by Illinois Law. If you have any question please respond to this email. When fulfilling this request please reply to this email and send the material in digital format.

Tracy Siska

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1205 | Chicago, IL 60604Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

Group Exhibit L

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 2

9 of

49

Page 32: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

From: FOIA [email protected]: RE: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17- Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

Date: September 11, 2017 at 11:48 AMTo: Tracy Siska [email protected]

Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

The Chicago Police Department received your Freedom of Information Act Request on September 11,2017. Under the Freedom of Information Act, a public body may extend the time to respond to a FOIA requestby up to 5 business days for a limited number of reasons. Pursuant to Section 5 ILCS 140/3(e) of the Act,the CPD is extending the time to respond to your request by 5 business days from the original due date for thefollowing reason(s):

( ) The requested records are stored in whole or in part at other locationsother than the office having charge of the requested records;

( ) The requested records require the collection of a substantial number of specified records;

(X) The request is couched in categorical terms and requires anextensive search for the records responsive to it;

( ) The requested records have not been located in the course ofroutine search and additional efforts are being made to locatethem;

( ) The requested records require examination and evaluation by personnelhaving the necessary competence and discretion to determine if they areexempt from disclosure or should be revealed only with appropriatedeletions;

(X) The request for records cannot be complied by the public body within thetime limits prescribed by the Freedom of Information Act, 5 ILCS 140/3(c),without unduly burdening or interfering with the operations of the publicbody;

(X ) There is a need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicablespeed, with another public body or among two or more components of anypublic body having a substantial interest in the determination or in thesubject matter of the request.

Chicago Police DepartmentFOIA Section

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED,CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or theemployee or agent responsible for delivering that message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution orcopying of this document is strictly prohibited.

From: Tracy Siska [[email protected]]Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 11:05 AMTo: FOIASubject: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17

Please provide the following records in accordance with the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

0 of

49

Page 33: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

A. "Please provide aggregate totals for the following categories broken down by month for every month since 1/1/16 - through 8/31/17. Pleasefurther break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of officers hired by the Chicago Police Department

2. Number of cadets entering the Chicago Police Department academy

3. Number of cadets graduating from the Chicago Police Department academy

4. Number of officers retiring from the Chicago Police Department

5. Number of officers that left the employ of the Chicago Police Department for any reason besides retirement

B. For every entrance exam given by the Chicago Police Department from 1/1/16 - 8/31/17 please detail the following aggregate totals: Pleasefurther break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of individuals that applied to take the exam

2. Number of individuals that completed the exam

3. Number of individuals that passed the exam

4. Number of individuals that attempted each qualifying test, i.e. the psychological exam, POWER test, etc…., and the number of individuals thatboth failed and passed the exam.

Please fulfill this request in the 5 working days mandated by Illinois Law. If you have any question please respond to this email. When fulfilling thisrequest please reply to this email and send the material in digital format.

Tracy Siska

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1205 | Chicago, IL 60604Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

1 of

49

Page 34: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

From: Tracy Siska [email protected]: Re: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17- Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

Date: September 30, 2017 at 4:18 PMTo: FOIA [email protected]

Can you please let me know the status of our FOIA request?

Tracy Siska

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 9 W. Washington, Suite 400 | Chicago, IL 60604 | Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:46 AM, FOIA <[email protected]> wrote:

Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

The Chicago Police Department received your Freedom of Information Act Request on September 11, 2017.Under the Freedom of Information Act, a public body may extend the time to respond to a FOIA request by upto 5 business days for a limited number of reasons. Pursuant to Section 5 ILCS 140/3(e) of the Act, the CPDis extending the time to respond to your request by 5 business days from the original due date for thefollowing reason(s):

( ) The requested records are stored in whole or in part at other locations

other than the office having charge of the requested records; ( ) The requested records require the collection of a substantial number of specified records; (X) The request is couched in categorical terms and requires an

extensive search for the records responsive to it;

( ) The requested records have not been located in the course of routine search and additional efforts are being made to locate them;

( ) The requested records require examination and evaluation by personnel

having the necessary competence and discretion to determine if they are exempt from disclosure or should be revealed only with appropriate deletions;

(X) The request for records cannot be complied by the public body within the

time limits prescribed by the Freedom of Information Act,5 ILCS 140/3(c), without unduly burdening or interfering with the operations of the public body;

(X ) There is a need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable

speed, with another public body or among two or more components of any public body having a substantial interest in the determination or in the subject matter of the request.

Chicago Police DepartmentFOIA Section

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

2 of

49

Page 35: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering that message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this document is strictly prohibited.

From: Tracy Siska [[email protected]]Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 11:05 AMTo: FOIASubject: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17

Please provide the following records in accordance with the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

A. "Please provide aggregate totals for the following categories broken down by month for every month since 1/1/16 - through 8/31/17. Please further break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of officers hired by the Chicago Police Department

2. Number of cadets entering the Chicago Police Department academy

3. Number of cadets graduating from the Chicago Police Department academy

4. Number of officers retiring from the Chicago Police Department

5. Number of officers that left the employ of the Chicago Police Department for any reason besides retirement

B. For every entrance exam given by the Chicago Police Department from 1/1/16 - 8/31/17 please detail the following aggregate totals: Please further break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of individuals that applied to take the exam

2. Number of individuals that completed the exam

3. Number of individuals that passed the exam

4. Number of individuals that attempted each qualifying test, i.e. the psychological exam, POWER test, etc…., and the number of individuals that both failed and passed the exam.

Please fulfill this request in the 5 working days mandated by Illinois Law. If you have any question please respond to this email. When fulfilling this request please reply to this email and send the material in digital format.

Tracy Siska

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1205 | Chicago, IL 60604Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

3 of

49

Page 36: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

From: Tracy Siska [email protected]: Re: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17- Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

Date: October 10, 2017 at 10:38 AMTo: FOIA [email protected]

Can you please provide me with an update on my FOIA request?

Tracy

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 9 W. Washington, Suite 400 | Chicago, IL 60604 | Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

On Sep 30, 2017, at 4:18 PM, Tracy Siska <[email protected]> wrote:

Can you please let me know the status of our FOIA request?

Tracy Siska

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 9 W. Washington, Suite 400 | Chicago, IL 60604 | Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:46 AM, FOIA <[email protected]> wrote:

Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

The Chicago Police Departmentreceived your Freedom of Information Act Request on September 11, 2017.Under the Freedom of Information Act, a public body may extend the time to respond to a FOIA request byup to 5 business days for a limited number of reasons. Pursuant to Section 5 ILCS 140/3(e) of the Act, theCPD is extending the time to respond to your request by 5 business days from the original due date for thefollowing reason(s):

( ) The requested records are stored in whole or in part at other locations

other than the office having charge of the requested records; ( ) The requested records require the collection of a substantial number of specified records; (X) The request is couched in categorical terms and requires an

extensive search for the records responsive to it;

( ) The requested records have not been located in the course of routine search and additional efforts are being made to locate them;

( ) The requested records require examination and evaluation by

personnel having the necessary competence and discretion to determine if they are exempt from disclosure or should be revealed only with appropriate deletions;

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

4 of

49

Page 37: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

(X) The request for records cannot be complied by the public body within the

time limits prescribed by the Freedom of Information Act,5 ILCS 140/3(c), without unduly burdening or interfering with the operations of the public body;

(X ) There is a need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all

practicable speed, with another public body or among two or more components of any public body having a substantial interest in the determination or in the subject matter of the request.

Chicago Police DepartmentFOIA Section

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering that message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this document is strictly prohibited.

From: Tracy Siska [[email protected]]Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 11:05 AMTo: FOIASubject: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17

Please provide the following records in accordance with the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

A. "Please provide aggregate totals for the following categories broken down by month for every month since 1/1/16 - through 8/31/17. Please further break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of officers hired by the Chicago Police Department

2. Number of cadets entering the Chicago Police Department academy

3. Number of cadets graduating from the Chicago Police Department academy

4. Number of officers retiring from the Chicago Police Department

5. Number of officers that left the employ of the Chicago Police Department for any reason besides retirement

B. For every entrance exam given by the Chicago Police Department from 1/1/16 - 8/31/17 please detail the following aggregate totals: Please further break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of individuals that applied to take the exam

2. Number of individuals that completed the exam

3. Number of individuals that passed the exam

4. Number of individuals that attempted each qualifying test, i.e. the psychological exam, POWER test, etc…., and the number of individuals that both failed and passed the exam.

Please fulfill this request in the 5 working days mandated by Illinois Law. If you have any question please respond to this email. When fulfilling this request please reply to this email and send the material in digital format.

Tracy Siska

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1205 | Chicago, IL 60604Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

5 of

49

Page 38: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

6 of

49

Page 39: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

From: Karr, Landon P. [email protected]: FW: Follow-up - P428461 FW: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17- Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

Date: October 10, 2017 at 2:11 PMTo: [email protected]

Mr. Siska, Apologies for the delay in getting this material together. As easy as it may seem, it is simply not a set of records that is maintained regularly byCPD. I'm still trying to see what I can do to piece together some of this from a variety of different places within this department. Again, apologies. I will be in touch once I have a better answer for you. Landon

From: FOIASent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 1:31 PMTo: Karr, Landon P.Subject: Follow-up - P428461 FW: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17- Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED,CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or theemployee or agent responsible for delivering that message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution orcopying of this document is strictly prohibited.

From: Tracy Siska [[email protected]]Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:38 AMTo: FOIASubject: Re: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17- Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

Can you please provide me with an update on my FOIA request?

Tracy

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 9 W. Washington, Suite 400 | Chicago, IL 60604 | Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:46 AM, FOIA <[email protected]> wrote:

Extension Notice FOIA # P428461

The Chicago Police Department received your Freedom of Information Act Request on September 11,2017. Under the Freedom of Information Act, a public body may extend the time to respond toa FOIA request by up to 5 business days for a limited number of reasons. Pursuant to Section5 ILCS 140/3(e) of the Act, the CPD is extending the time to respond to your request by 5 business daysfrom the original due date for the following reason(s):

( )

The requested records are stored in whole or in part at other locations other than the office having charge of the requested records;

( ) The requested records require the collection of a substantial number of specified records; (X) The request is couched in categorical terms and requires an

extensive search for the records responsive to it;

( ) The requested records have not been located in the course of

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

7 of

49

Page 40: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

( ) The requested records have not been located in the course ofroutine search and additional efforts are being made tolocate them;

( ) The requested records require examination and evaluation by

personnel having the necessary competence and discretion todetermine if they are exempt from disclosure or should be revealedonly with appropriate deletions;

(X) The request for records cannot be complied by the public body within the

time limitsprescribed by the Freedom of Information Act,5 ILCS 140/3(c), without unduly burdening or interfering with the operations of the public body;

(X

) There is a need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed, with another public body or among two or morecomponents of any public body having a substantial interest in thedetermination or in the subject matter of the request.

Chicago Police DepartmentFOIA Section

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED,CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or theemployee or agent responsible for delivering that message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distributionor copying of this document is strictly prohibited.

From: Tracy Siska [[email protected]]Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 11:05 AMTo: FOIASubject: Chicago Justice Project FOIA 9/11/17

Please provide the following records in accordance with the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

A. "Please provide aggregate totals for the following categories broken down by month for every month since 1/1/16 - through 8/31/17. Pleasefurther break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of officers hired by the Chicago Police Department

2. Number of cadets entering the Chicago Police Department academy

3. Number of cadets graduating from the Chicago Police Department academy

4. Number of officers retiring from the Chicago Police Department

5. Number of officers that left the employ of the Chicago Police Department for any reason besides retirement

B. For every entrance exam given by the Chicago Police Department from 1/1/16 - 8/31/17 please detail the following aggregate totals: Pleasefurther break down the data by the race and gender of the individuals.

1. Number of individuals that applied to take the exam

2. Number of individuals that completed the exam

3. Number of individuals that passed the exam

4. Number of individuals that attempted each qualifying test, i.e. the psychological exam, POWER test, etc…., and the number of individualsthat both failed and passed the exam.

Please fulfill this request in the 5 working days mandated by Illinois Law. If you have any question please respond to this email. When fulfillingthis request please reply to this email and send the material in digital format.

Tracy Siska

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

8 of

49

Page 41: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

------------Tracy Siska | Executive DirectorChicago Justice Project | 53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1205 | Chicago, IL 60604Ph. (312) 971-6745 |

[email protected] | www.chicagojustice.org |Twitter: CJPJustProj

EL

EC

TR

ON

ICA

LLY

FIL

ED

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

5/22

/201

8 1:

42 P

M5/

22/2

018

1:42

PM

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

2018

-CH

-065

7620

18-C

H-0

6576

PAG

E 3

9 of

49

Page 42: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit M

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 40 of 49

Page 43: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit N

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 41 of 49

Page 44: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit O

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 42 of 49

Page 45: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit P

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 43 of 49

Page 46: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit Q

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 44 of 49

Page 47: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 45 of 49

Page 48: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit R

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 46 of 49

Page 49: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Exhibit SELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 47 of 49

Page 50: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 48 of 49

Page 51: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

ELECTRONICALLY FILED5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM 5/22/2018 1:42 PM

2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576 2018-CH-06576PAGE 49 of 49

Page 52: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Summons - Alias Summons (12/31/15) CCG N001

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS

2018-CH-06576No.

Defendant Address:

CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT

3510 S MICHIGAN AVE

CHICAGO, IL 60653

CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT

v.

CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT

SUMMONS ALIAS - SUMMONS

To each defendant:

YOU ARE SUMMONED and required to file an answer to the complaint in this case, a copy of which is heretoattached, or otherwise file your appearance, and pay the required fee, in the Office of the Clerk of this Court at thefollowing location:

You must file within 30 days after service of this Summons, not counting the day of service.

10220 S. 76th Ave.Bridgeview, IL 60455

802 ,Chicago, Illinois 60602District 2 - Skokie

District 5 - Bridgeview

5600 Old Orchard Rd.Skokie, IL 60077

16501 S. Kedzie Pkwy.Markham, IL 60428

50 W. Washington, LL-01Chicago, IL 60602

2121 Euclid 1500Rolling Meadows, IL 60008

District 6 - Markham

District 3 - Rolling Meadows District 4 - Maywood

Richard J. Daley Center

Maybrook Ave.Maywood, IL 60153

Richard J. Daley Center, 50 W. Washington, Room

IF YOU FAIL TO DO SO, A JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT MAY BE ENTERED AGAINST YOU FOR THERELIEF REQUESTED IN THE COMPLAINT.

To the officer:This Summons must be returned by the officer or other person to whom it was given for service, with endorsementof service and fees, if any, immediately after service. If service cannot be made, this Summons shall be returned soendorsed. This Summons may not be served later than thirty (30) days after its date.

Witness: Tuesday, 22 May 2018 Atty. No.: 41295

/s DOROTHY BROWNName: LOEVY & LOEVY

DOROTHY BROWN, Clerk of CourtAtty. for: CHICAGO JUSTICE PROJECT

Address: 311 N ABERDEEN 3FLDate of Service:

City/State/Zip Code: CHICAGO, IL 60607(To be inserted by officer on copy left with Defendant or other person)

Telephone: (312) 243-5900

**Service by Facsimile Transmission will be accepted at:Primary Email Address: [email protected]

Secondary Email Address(es):

[email protected]

(Area Code) (Facsimile Telephone Number)

DOROTHY BROWN, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOISPage 1 of 1

Page 53: NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING - chicagojusticeproject...CPD also stated that under Section 3(g) the burden of production outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Ex. H. 18. On February

Plaintiffs

Defendants

Plaintiffs Name Plaintiffs Address State Zip Unit #

CHICAGO JUSTICEPROJECT

1Total Plaintiffs:

Service ByDefendant Name Defendant Address State Unit #

3510 S MICHIGAN AVE CHICAGO, IL 60653 Sheriff-ClerkCHICAGO POLICEDEPARTMENT

1Total Defendants:

Chancery DIVISIONLitigant List

Printed on 05/22/2018

Case Number: 2018-CH-06576 Page 1 of 1