nov 2001 craig ogilvie 1 angular correlations at high pt: craig ogilvie for the phenix collaboration...
TRANSCRIPT
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 1
Angular Correlations at High pt:Craig Ogilvie for the Phenix Collaboration
Energy-loss:increased medium-induced
gluon-radiation
hadron distributionsoftened, broadened?
hard-scatteredparton during Au+Au
hard-scatteredparton from e.g. p+p
gluon radiation
cone of hadrons
p p
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 2
Correlations
2-particle angular correlation functions
Medium-induced gluon emission within QGP – predicted to be broad angles (>10 deg shown later in talk)– fragmentation angular-width may be broader – correlations at small may be broadened
study correlations from peripheral => central reactions– complementary to single-particle pt spectra and +hadron
back-to-back correlations.
)(N
)(N)C(
events mixed
real
21
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 3
Outline
Examples of angular correlation data from p+p, e+p Angle correlations from Au+Au at s1/2 = 130 AGeV
– pt dependence – centrality dependence
Simulations of possible sources of angular correlations – work in progress
Measurements for this year-2 Which observable makes a link between experiment and theory
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 4
ISR Data p+p s1/2 = 62 GeV
CCOR Collaboration (M. J. Tannenbaum) Trigger particle (neutral) with pt > 7.0 GeV/c
– azimuthal distribution of charged particles– strong back-to-back and near-side emission
back-to-backnear-side
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 5
Transverse Momentum Within Jet
jT transverse momentum with respect to “jet” axis
Trigger PTjTJetJet
PT jT
PoutkT
<| jT|> = 400 MeV/c, use as one check for what we observe in HI
CCOR CollaborationPhys. Lett. 97B, 163 (1980))
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 6
HERA e+p Angular Distribution Within a Jet
Within a jet Yield of two particles
separated by angle 12
Transformed to
)/)sin(ln()/ln( 12
coneAngleP
coneAngle
Yield peaked atsmall 12 ,
More complicated variablechosen to match expt. with what can be calculated.
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 7
Au+Au s1/2 = 130 AGeV
1.5M events, summer 2000 Phenix data -20 < collision vertex < 20 cm Central arm tracks
– momenta from drift chamber tracks– 1 < pt < 2.5 GeV/c
Centrality cuts expressed as a % of int=7.2b
– (zero degree energy) vs (charge in beam counters) Correlation functions
– mixed events from similar beam-vertex, centrality– 2-track acceptance cuts on both real, mixed pairs
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 8
Correlations Presented Today
Both hadrons between 1< pt < 2.5 GeV/c Two correlations formed
– both hadrons in west arm of PHENIX– one hadron in east, west arm of PHENIX
Studied as a function of pt, centrality
)(N
)(N)C(
events mixed
real
21
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 9
Possible Causes of Angular Correlation
Elliptic flow, jet fragmentation produce azimuthal correlations Analysis challenge to extract both
– jet fragmentation extends to narrow angles» near-side ~ 0-30 deg
– flow extends over full range with a harmonic oscillation
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 10
40-92% Centrality, 1.0 < pt < 2.5 GeV/c
Near-angle correlation fallsmore steeply than back-to-back correlation
Add correlations by ensuringsymmetry near 90o
Both hadrons in west arm
One hadron in west arm,other in east arm
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 11
1<pt<2.5 GeV/c (40-92%)
offset)2cos(a
2)/(2
1
widtheC
offset)2cos(a Csymmetric (elliptic flow) fit (poor)
stronger near-anglecorrelation than back-to-back
phenix preliminary
phenix preliminary
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 12
Centrality Dependence
40 to 92%
0 to 5%
1) near-angle correlation in central reactions: broader, smaller amplitude
2) elliptic flow v.small in central reactions
phenix preliminary
phenix preliminary
1< pt < 2.5 GeV/c
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 13
Au+Au Centrality Dependence
offset)2cos(a2)/(
2
1
width
eC
npart
width of correlation broadensfor more central reactions
systematic errors: how fit changes for different normalization criteria
1< pt < 2.5 GeV/cphenix preliminary
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 14
First-Order Comparison to p+p
npart
GeV/c 34.0
GeV/c 4.1)2
20sin(||
)2
sin(||
0
T
Thadron
T
j
pangleWidth
j
for peripheral data, on average both hadrons comparable pt
pp running this year impt.
phenix preliminary
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 15
Pt Dependence of Correlation
Fit to full function, display only offset)2cos(osc
near-anglecorrelation strongestfor high-pt
1.0 < pt < 2.5 GeV/c
0.5 < pt < 1.0 GeV/c
0.2 < pt < 0.5 GeV/c
central 40 –92%
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 16
Feasible Causes of Near-Angle Correlation(next slides)
Resonance decay leading to correlated particles
Decay of K0s (in progress, not shown today)
Fragmentation of high-pt parton Other….?
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 17
1) UrQMD Au+Au2) tag all resonances3) decay, apply pt cut
correlation strength 0.001due to decay of resonances5-10 times smaller than data
Resonance Study
1.0 < pt < 2.5 GeV/c|| <0.35
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 18
PYTHIA 6p+p at s1/2 = 130 GeV
Hard-Processes
1.0 < pt < 2.5 GeV/c, || <0.35
C
C
near-angle correlation strongerthan back-to-back
small acceptance reducesback-to-back acceptance fordifferent x1, x2
width of 0.35 rad = 20 degcomparable to periph. Au+Au<pt> scattered parton ~ 3GeV/c
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 19
Possible Reach With Year-2 Data
p+p baseline data 30-100 times more Au+Au statistics Higher-pt reach, pt > 5 GeV/c Asymmetric pt cuts, pt1 > 5 GeV/c, pt2 > 2 GeV/c
– better match to transverse momentum within jet Tag PID of leading hadron, correlate with all others
– 0 correlated with others» heading towards correlated with others
– leading p or p» speculative possible sensitivity to gluon vs quark jets
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 20
Making Connection With E-Loss Theory
Recent calculations, e.g. Baier, Schiff, Zakharov, calculate how much energy is radiated to outside a given cone angle
250 GeV jet1/3 of E is radiated > 20o
Can this formalism calc C()?Do we need new observablethat expt and theory can both use
Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci 2000, 50, p37
Nov 2001 Craig Ogilvie 21
Summary
High-pt near-angle correlations slightly stronger than back-angle correlations – well reproduced by Gaussian superimposed on oscillation– width of correlation broadens for more central reactions
Possible causes of near-angle correlation– decay of resonances
» factor of 5-10 smaller than observed signal
– weak decay of K0s , in progress
– fragmenting hard-physics» needs higher pt reach to be convincing» in this scenario, increasing width, broader fragmentation» open question: medium-induced gluon emission?