november 22, 2013 board meeting...nov 22, 2013 · 12/3/2013 intermodal transit centerintermodal...
TRANSCRIPT
November 22, 2013 Board Meeting
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 1
Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 2
Public Comments
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 3
Consent Calendar
3.1. Approve Minutes from September 27, 2013
Board Meeting
3.2. Approve Next SJJPA Board Meeting
Location and Start Time
January 24: Stockton, 12:00 – 2:00 pm
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 4
Update on Intermodal
Transit Center in
Hercules, CA
Ross Chittenden & William Silva
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 6 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Intermodal Transit Center Hercules, Cal i fornia
San Joaquin JPA Presentation
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 7 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Hercules, California
Interstate 80 & State Route 4
22 Miles Northeast of San Francisco
25 Miles South of Napa
16 Miles North of Oakland
50 Miles North of San Jose
57 Miles Southeast of Sacramento
Population: 24,060
Corporate HQ - $2B Research / Diagnostics Co
950 Acres of Open Space & Trails
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 8 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Hercules - Engaged Community with a Rich History
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 9 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
One Project – Many Facets Intermodal Transit Center (ITC)
1. Regional Transit Connectivity: Rail, Bus, Auto, Bike
2. Inter-City Passenger Rail
3. Transcontinental Freight Rail – Goods Movement
4. Bus Transit Service
5. Pedestrian / Bicycle Connections
6. Anchors Transit Oriented Bayfront Neighborhood
7. Environmental Sustainability
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 10 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Inter-City Passenger Rail
Capitol Corridor 30 Trains pass Hercules Daily
Auburn (Sacramento) to San Jose
San Joaquin 8 Trains pass Hercules Daily
Bakersfield to Oakland
Connecting Services
Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
Amtrak Long Distance Rail
SFO and OAK Airports
High Speed Rail (2018)
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 11 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Transcontinental Freight Rail – Goods Movement
Union Pacific Railroad 4th Most Congested Corridor
Mitigate Time Delay Impacts
Step Toward 3-Mile Segment
Geometry & Reliability
Port of Oakland Critical Rail Service
Oakland Army Base
Panama Canal (2015)
Contra Costa County
Working Waterfront
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 12 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Bus Transit Service
Regional Bus Connections
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 13 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Pedestrian / Bicycle Connections
ITC Project Elements San Francisco Bay Trail (1-1/4 Mile)
Creek Side Trail (1/2 Mile)
Completes Hercules Segment
Pinole Shores Pinole Shores SF Bay Trail
Pinole – Hercules Connection
Coordination with Railroad
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 14 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
ITC / Transit Oriented Development Interface
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 15 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Environmental Sustainability
ITC – Providing Transit Alternatives
Refugio Creek Restoration ITC Mitigation Area
Significant Ecological and Habitat Value
Tidal Marsh Plain Restoration
6.29 Acre Conservation Easement
Recognized for Sustainable Concepts 1 of 13 California Catalyst Projects (Dept of HCD)
LEED Neighborhood Development, Gold (USGBC)
High Quality Infill Development (Greenbelt Alliance)
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 16 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Funding Partners & Stakeholders Association of Bay Area Governments Bayfront Taskforce California Transportation Commission Caltrans and Caltrans Division of Rail Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority Contra Costa Board of Supervisors
Contra Costa Transportation Authority East Bay Regional Park District Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Hercules Bayfront, LLC Metropolitan Transportation Commission San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority Water Emergency Transportation Authority WestCAT Western Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 17 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Funding Partners & Stakeholders Recent Grant Application - Letters of Support
• Federal: Senator Boxer, Congressman Thompson, Congressman Miller • State Senate: Senator Hancock, Senator DeSaulnier, Senator Wolk • State Assembly: Assemblymember Skinner, Assemblymember Bonilla • Union Pacific Railroad, San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority, WestCAT • Caltrans, CCTA, WCCTAC • Contra Costa County – Board of Supervisors • East Bay Regional Park District • East Bay Leadership Council • Hercules Bayfront Task Force
Feb. 2013 Council Resolution: ITC is Highest Priority
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 18 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Building Toward Project Goals – Staged Delivery
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 19 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Building Toward Project Goals – Staged Delivery
Regional Bus Connections
Phase 1A • San Francisco Bay Trail – Pedestrian / Bicycle
• Path to Transit Center
• Preparation for Station Track
• Mitigation Areas for Transit Center
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 20 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Building Toward Project Goals – Staged Delivery
Regional Bus Connections
Phase 1B • Transit Loop – Bus Service
• Refugio Creek Realigned
• Sea Level Rise Addressed
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 21 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Building Toward Project Goals – Staged Delivery
Regional Bus Connections
Phase 1C • Initial Rail Station – Rail Service
• Ready for Service – 2018
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 22 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Building Toward Project Goals – Staged Delivery
Regional Bus Connections
Phases 2 – 4 • 1-1/2 Mile Station Track
• Access to Hercules Point
• Opportunity for Ferry Service
• Bay Trail and Creek Side Trail Connections
Click to edit Master title style
12/3/2013 23 INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER
Intermodal Transit Center Hercules, Cal i fornia
San Joaquin JPA Presentation
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 5
Caltrans Presentation on the
Most Recent San Joaquin
Passenger Survey
Information
Gretchen Brigaman
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 6
Presentation on FY13/14
Amtrak Agreement for
the San Joaquin
Stacey Mortensen
On October 8, 2013 the CTC approved the
Financial Allocation for Fiscal Year 2013-14
Intercity Rail Operations and Feeder Bus Services.
The San Joaquin service is shown as having a
$10.633 million subsidy increase this year (from
FY 2012-13 to FY 2013-14).
This represents a 33.4% increase in the state
subsidy from the previous year. The Pacific
Surfliner has a 25.1% subsidy increase and the
Capitol Corridor has only 1.96% increase.
Presentation on FY 13/14 Amtrak
Agreement for the San Joaquin
Presentation on FY 13/14 Amtrak
Agreement for the San Joaquin
FY 11/12 through FY 13/14
State Costs for State-Supported Intercity Rail Routes
($ in thousands)
ROUTE FY 11/12
Allocation
FY 12/13
Allocation
FY 13/14
Current Request
Pacific Surfliner $28,953 $29,423 $36,819
San Joaquin $31,788 $31,814 $42,447
State-Administered Routes Total $60,741 $61,237 $79,266
Capitol Corridor $29,606 $29,110 $29,681
All Routes Total $90,347 $90,347 $108,947
FY 12/13 State-Supported Intercity Rail Routes
Projected Financial Performance
($ in thousands)
TOTAL
EXPENSES
PASSENGER
REVENUES
NET LOSS
(STATE
SUPPORT)
FAREBOX
RATIO
Pacific Surfliner $102,363 $70,168 $36,819 69%
San Joaquin $84,025 $44,839 $42,447 53%
Capitol Corridor $60,563 $31,232 $29,681 52%
TOTALS $246,951 $146,239 $108,947 59%
Presentation on FY 13/14 Amtrak
Agreement for the San Joaquin
The staff report to the CTC indicated:
“For previous years the Pacific Surfliner corridor
had been 30 % by Amtrak. With PRIIA Section
209 becoming law the state is now responsible
for 100 % of the Pacific Surfliner corridor
funding.
Also included with this are additional Capital
Equipment Costs for both the Pacific Surfliner and
San Joaquin corridors.”
Presentation on FY 13/14 Amtrak
Agreement for the San Joaquin
Detailed cost breakdowns for the FY 2011-12
through FY 2013-14 numbers along with
explanations for the cost increases for each of the
three state-supported intercity rail services were
requested from Caltrans.
Brian Annis, Undersecretary for CalSTA facilitated
a meeting in Late October between SJJPA staff,
Amtrak, Caltrans, and the CCJPA’s Managing
Director to provide additional information
requested by the SJJPA.
Presentation on FY 13/14 Amtrak
Agreement for the San Joaquin
More detailed information was provided by
Amtrak at the meeting, however additional
information is needed to fully understand the cost
increases and clarify:
Back Up Budget Detail for Expense Line Items
All Costs Attributable to the Comet Cars
CCJPA Capital Equipment Costs Allocated to San Joaquins
PRIIA Section 209 Costs vs. Normal Inflation
Fare Revenue Assumptions Compared to Past Trends
Presentation on FY 13/14 Amtrak
Agreement for the San Joaquin
Next Steps
More Detailed Requests for Budget Information
Coordination with LOSSAN JPA on Issues in Common
Follow-up Meeting with CalSTA, Amtrak, Caltrans and
CCJPA
Presentation on FY 13/14 Amtrak
Agreement for the San Joaquin
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 7
Draft Chapters for SJJPA
Business Plan
Dan Leavitt
The Draft Business Plan must be included and
referenced as part of the SJJPA’s Interagency
Transfer Agreement.
AB 1779 specifies a number of requirements for
the Business Plan.
The Draft Business Plan is to be completed by
the March 2014 SJJPA Board Meeting.
Initial Draft Chapters are to be presented at the
November and January meetings.
Draft Chapters for SJJPA Business Plan
1. Introduction
3. Historical Performance of Service
12. Marketing and Outreach
13. Advocacy
15. Separation of Funding
18. Safety and Security
Draft Chapters for SJJPA Business Plan
1. Introduction
3. Historical Performance of Service
12. Marketing and Outreach
13. Advocacy
15. Separation of Funding
18. Safety and Security
Draft Chapters for SJJPA Business Plan
California has three state-supported intercity
passenger rail routes: the Pacific Surfliner,
Capitol Corridor, and the San Joaquin.
Voter-approved bond measures passed in 1990,
helped transform these services into some of the
most successful intercity passenger rail services in
the nation.
With over 5.6 million annual passengers for fiscal
year 2012/13, California has more than 20
percent of all the nation’s intercity riders.
3. Historical Performance of Service
The San Joaquin rail service extends 364 miles
and provides direct rail service to 11 counties.
These counties have a current total population of
more than 8 million residents.
Nearly 50% of the corridor population resides in
the eight San Joaquin Valley counties (just over 4
million), with little over 32% of the population in
the two Bay Area counties (2.6 million), and about
18% in Sacramento County (1.44 million).
3. Historical Performance of Service
For more than 283 miles, the route traverses the
entire San Joaquin Valley from north to south
accounting for about 78% of the total route miles.
In 1979-80 the San Joaquin service only had two
daily round trips between Oakland and
Bakersfield and annual ridership was a little over
123,000.
Ridership has steadily increased over the years
and in FY 2012/13 it reached a record 1.2
million passengers with 6 daily round trips.
3. Historical Performance of Service
San Joaquin revenue has been increasing since FY
1994/95 and the farebox ratio has been
increasing since FY 2002/03.
The farebox ratio in FY 2011/12 had risen to
55%, whereas it was only 40% in FY 2002/03.
The San Joaquin service is currently the fifth most
used intercity service within the Amtrak system.
Between FY 12 and FY 13, San Joaquin ridership
increased by more passengers (75,202) than any
other Amtrak service in the nation.
3. Historical Performance of Service
While San Joaquin ridership and revenue has
been steadily increasing, there have been no
additional frequency of service added for over a
decade (since 2002), and no new service
between Oakland and Bakersfield added in over
20 years.
3. Historical Performance of Service
The extensive network of dedicated Amtrak
Thruway buses connecting with the San Joaquin is
critical to the performance of this service.
Thruway bus service connections in Bakersfield,
Sacramento, Stockton, Oakland, Emeryville,
Martinez, Merced, and Hanford
Caltrans contracts with Amtrak for dedicated
feeder bus services, and Amtrak then contracts
with bus operators.
3. Historical Performance of Service
In 2012, nearly 45 percent (510,793) of San
Joaquin passengers used an Amtrak Thruway bus
on at least one end of their trip.
All trains either initiating or terminating at
Bakersfield are met by Amtrak Thruway buses
connecting south to Southern California.
In FY 2012, over 318,000 San Joaquin
passengers used a Amtrak Thruway bus between
Bakersfield and Southern California, with over
half of these passengers traveling to/from LAUS
3. Historical Performance of Service
CITY PAIR Ridership (thousands)
1. Bakersfield-Fresno 104.7
2. Bakersfield-Stockton 85.6
3. Fresno-Hanford 77.2
4. Bakersfield-Hanford 45.2
5. Fresno-Stockton 44.0
6. Bakersfield-Sacramento 38.7
7. Bakersfield-Modesto 38.6
City Pair Ridership FY 12 (Includes
Passengers Using Thruway Buses)
CITY PAIR Ridership (thousands)
1. Bakersfield-Fresno 104.7
2. Bakersfield-Stockton 85.6
3. Fresno-Hanford 77.2
4. Bakersfield-Hanford 45.2
5. Fresno-Stockton 44.0
6. Bakersfield-Sacramento 38.7
7. Bakersfield-Modesto 38.6
City Pair Ridership FY 12 (Includes
Passengers Using Thruway Buses)
CITY PAIR Ridership (thousands)
1. Fresno-Hanford 69.8
2. Fresno-Sacramento 49.1
3. Fresno-LAUS 39.7
4. Fresno-Bakersfield 29.8
5. Stockton (SJ St.)-Oakland 20.1
6. Stockton (SJ St.)-Richmond 17.3
7. Fresno-Martinez 17.2
City Pair Ridership FY 12
(Origin/Destination)
STATION Pass. Ons/Offs (thousands)
1. Bakersfield 507
2. Fresno 394
3. Stockton (SJ St.) 278
4. Hanford 211
5. Sacramento 131
6. Merced 125
7. Modesto 118
Station Ridership 2012 (Includes Passengers
Using Thruway Buses)
STATION Pass. Ons/Offs (thousands)
1. Bakersfield 507
2. Fresno 394
3. Stockton (SJ St.) 278
4. Hanford 211
5. Sacramento 131
6. Merced 125
7. Modesto 118
Station Ridership 2012 (Includes Passengers
Using Thruway Buses)
STATION Pass. Ons/Offs (thousands)
1. Fresno 394
2. Bakersfield 190
3. Hanford 189
4. Sacramento 167
5. LAUS 161
6. Stockton (SJ St.) 145
7. Merced 125
Station Ridership 2012 (Origin/Destination)
Goals and Objectives of the SJJPA Marketing
and Outreach Program:
Ensure Member Agencies, Corridor Communities and
Major Stakeholders Participate in the Development of
the Marketing and Outreach Plan
Ensure Retention of Existing Riders
Ensure Adequate Education and Awareness about the San
Joaquins in all Communities Served by the Trains and
Thruway Buses
12. Marketing and Outreach
Goals and Objectives of the SJJPA Marketing
and Outreach Program:
Reach out to Minority, Non-English-Speaking
Constituencies, and Members of the Public along the
Corridor who may not know about the San Joaquin
Service
Utilize Community Advocates as Communication
Channels for Information Flow and Leverage
Information Distribution Through All Corridor
Communities
12. Marketing and Outreach
Goals and Objectives of the SJJPA Marketing
and Outreach Program:
Showcase attractions in Communities Served by the
Trains and Thruway Buses
Increase Outreach Focus and Opportunities for School,
Senior Group and other Special Group Trips
Incorporate Regular Passenger and Community Appreciation
Activities and Events to ensure current rider retention
Solicit Feedback From Passengers and Communities on the
Effectiveness of the Outreach Programs and the San Joaquin
Service
12. Marketing and Outreach
Goals and Objectives of the SJJPA Marketing
and Outreach Program:
Retool Marketing and Outreach Programs in Response to
Feedback
Increase Ridership and Revenue to Ensure Future San Joaquin
Service Sustainability
General Partnerships and Communication Tools
12. Marketing and Outreach
There is no ongoing, stable capital funding source
for the California Intercity Passenger Rail Program
(CIPRP).
A key to funding the future growth of the San
Joaquin service is developing a much stronger
political base of support.
This needed advocacy was one of the key reasons
for AB 1799 and for establishing the SJJPA.
13. Advocacy
One of the primary advantages of a regional
governance, or JPA model, is the ability for active
advocacy at the local, regional, state and federal
levels.
SJJPA can bring the full collective power of the
Member Agencies and communities served by the
San Joaquins in support of the service.
13. Advocacy
CIPR Leadership Coalition
Jointly advocating for improvement of the CIPRP
Lobbying in both Sacramento and Washington D.C.
Coordinated effort to educate and gain support for
service
Select Committees in Senate and Assembly
Mission Statement
Guiding Principles
13. Advocacy
The SJJPA, CHSRA and Caltrans adopted a “Joint
Policy Statement” regarding coordination
between HSR and the San Joaquin service.
This agreement ensures the SJJPA and affected
communities will be actively involved in any
coordination, decisions, and/or service
adjustments between the San Joaquins and the
proposed HSR service.
13. Advocacy
The focus of the SJJPA Safety and Security
program is to develop a grass roots approach to
increasing the public’s awareness of railroad
safety.
The program will be focused on areas around
stations, and at railroad crossings, with an
emphasis on rural areas having private crossings
in the Central Valley.
18. Safety and Security
Goals of Safety & Security Program
Assess current program efforts
Identify all resources needed and available
Develop appropriate outreach for San Joaquins
18. Safety and Security
Additional Action Items
Coordination of rail safety outreach to specific
communities/populations based on safety data.
Coordination of Emergency Preparedness Training for
corridor first responders and train personnel.
Coordination of rail security awareness training for train
crews, maintenance staff, bus operators and station agents.
Assist with coordination and monitoring of disaster
simulations.
18. Safety and Security
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 8
San Joaquin Rolling
Stock Update
Brian Schmidt
Comet Car Coordination
On October 1st, the second test run of the Comet Cars
occurred, the test train operated with no major delays.
On October 21st, Comet Cars were put into regular
service operating as San Joaquin trains 711(4:55 am
depart Bakersfield) and 718 (6:50 pm depart
Oakland) between Oakland and Bakersfield.
A Service Alert was put on the Amtrak California
website notifying passengers of Amtrak 711 and 718
using refurbished equipment, and encouraging
passengers with “limited mobility” to arrive at the station
45 minutes prior to train departure.
San Joaquin Rolling Stock Update
Caltrans’ strategy is to deploy the bi-level vehicles removed
from service to the heaviest San Joaquin ridership trains:
Northbound – 701, 703, 713 and 715
Southbound – 702, 704, 714 and 716
Caltrans’ concept of lengthening bi-level trains (above) was to
start the week of Thanksgiving.
However, the deployment of the bi-level cars is contingent upon
having spare Comet car equipment available for mechanical
issues/regular maintenance.
Last week there were 4 days when the Comet Cars were not in
service due to lack of a spare café car.
San Joaquin Rolling Stock Presentation
San Joaquin Rolling Stock Presentation
San Joaquin OTP Nov. 1 thru Nov. 20
Trains Operated - 240
Trains On-Time - 194
Trains Late - 46
November OTP - 80.8%
Year to Date OTP - 82.7%
San Joaquin Rolling Stock Presentation
711/718 OTP Nov. 1 thru Nov. 20
On-Time - 42
Late Trains - 10
November OTP - 76%
Trains are experiencing delays due to the loading of
passengers, baggage and bicycles, averaging
approximately 11 minutes delay per train.
San Joaquin Rolling Stock Presentation
Next Steps
Meeting with Caltrans Division of Rail to understand spare
car issues resulting in reduced capacity
Potential board request to delay implementation of second
Comet Car deployment
Detailed review of future ridership impacts, delays
San Joaquin Rolling Stock Presentation
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 9
Report on October 26 Lodi
Community Field Work and
Approve Concept for Future
Community Field Work Activities
Thomas Reeves
Concept 1
Weekend, Weekday Evening
Similar to Hanford, Lodi – Special Events and Local
Activities
Concept 2
Combined with an SJJPA board meeting
Evening prior or day-of meeting
Reception, tour, local activity
What’s Next for the Field Work Program
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 10
Report on October 17,
2013 CIPR Leadership
Coalition Meeting
Dan Leavitt
CA Intercity Passenger Rail Leadership Coalition
The last Chair/Vice Chairs meeting of the CIPR
Leadership Coalition was held on October 17th in
Orange, CA.
Discussed progress towards the formation of
“Select Committees” in the CA Legislature for
conventional rail services.
To work to increase state funding to improve and expand
the program and leverage these investments by
advocating for additional federal rail funds.
Report on Oct 17 Leadership Coalition Mtg
Potential legislation to provide additional funding
for the CA Intercity Passenger Rail Program and
efforts to increase the support network for this
program was discussed.
It was decided that the CIPR Leadership Coalition
should first establish the Select Committees and
focus on increasing support for the conventional
rail services at this time.
Report on Oct 17 Leadership Coalition Mtg
Each of the CIPR Leadership Coalition partners is
working to develop a list of supporters.
The CIPR Leadership Coalition is also preparing a
“Legislative Report” that should be ready for
review by the beginning of 2014.
The next CIPR Leadership Coalition meeting will
be held on January 29, 2014 in Oakland. The
Second Annual “Rail Summit” is being planned for
April 2-3, 2014 in Los Angeles.
Report on Oct 17 Leadership Coalition Mtg
Letters of Support
Central Valley Rail Working
Group
SJV Regional Policy Council
Sacramento RT
San Joaquin RRC
CA Partnership for SJV
Stanislaus COG
San Joaquin COG
Madera CTC
Merced CAG
Tulare CAG
Fresno COG
Mayor of Fresno
Steve Cohn, Sacramento City
Council, CCJPA Board member
City of Modesto
City of Merced
City of Lodi
City of Elk Grove
City of Sacramento
City of Visalia
City of Corcoran
Letters of Support
City of Stockton
City of Selma
City of Mendota
City of Turlock
City of Huron
City of Fowler
City of Kingsburg
San Joaquin RTD
Fresno County
Contra Costa County Board of
Supervisors
Fresno Regional Workforce
Investment Board
SJV Air Pollution Control District
Greater Stockton Chamber of
Commerce
California CV Economic
Development Corporation
Sacramento Area COG
City of Manteca
City of Tracy
Letters of Support
Contra Costa Transportation
Authority
Greater Fresno Area Chamber
of Commerce
Sacramento Metropolitan
Chamber of Commerce
San Joaquin Partnership
CA Transit Association
San Joaquin JPA
City of Bakersfield
Kern COG
Transform
SPUR
Natural Resources Defense
Council
RailPAC
National Association of
Railroad Passengers
Operating Engineers Local
Union #3
Merced County
Kings CAG
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 11
Board Members Comments
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 12
Administrative Matters or
Announcements
•Correspondence
•Finance/Audit Subcommittee of the Board
•SJJPA Letterhead
Stacey Mortensen
San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Item 13
Adjournment
November 22, 2013 Board Meeting