npe from david yu’s cherenkov simulationpsec.uchicago.edu/simulation/camden_results.doc · web...

5
Npe from David Yu’s Cherenkov simulation I used David’s simulation of the production of Cherenkov radiation to estimate the Npe we had with each radiator. The simulation told me the number of photons produced from a particle interacting with the quartz radiator. The output of the simulation gives the photons final position, the time it arrives, and its wavelength. I added a loop to the simulation so it would run 10 times and write all of the data to a txt file. The text file was imported into Microsoft Excel. I wrote a macro in visual basic to histogram the photon wavelength. The number of photons at each wavelength was then multiplied by the QE values provide by Jerry. I didn’t use and of the other adjustments he uses (pore entrance efficiency, etc.). This also doesn’t take into account the MCP pad size, which would reduce the Npe even more. There errors are not yet fully known. The most obvious contributor, for me, is the QE estimates. If there are other large contributors that you can think of please speak up. The results: 2mm – 2.6 5mm – 6.89 8mm – 10.9 11mm -13.57 The position of the photons was plotted in a scatter plot using excel. The MCPs have a pad size of ~12mm X ~12mm. All plots are in μm. These plots show that most of the photons are arriving on the pads and misses only happens at the 11mm radiator.

Upload: dangthien

Post on 19-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Npe from David Yu’s Cherenkov simulationpsec.uchicago.edu/Simulation/camden_results.doc · Web viewI used David’s simulation of the production of Cherenkov radiation to estimate

Npe from David Yu’s Cherenkov simulation

I used David’s simulation of the production of Cherenkov radiation to estimate the Npe we had with each radiator. The simulation told me the number of photons produced from a particle interacting with the quartz radiator. The output of the simulation gives the photons final position, the time it arrives, and its wavelength. I added a loop to the simulation so it would run 10 times and write all of the data to a txt file. The text file was imported into Microsoft Excel. I wrote a macro in visual basic to histogram the photon wavelength. The number of photons at each wavelength was then multiplied by the QE values provide by Jerry. I didn’t use and of the other adjustments he uses (pore entrance efficiency, etc.). This also doesn’t take into account the MCP pad size, which would reduce the Npe even more. There errors are not yet fully known. The most obvious contributor, for me, is the QE estimates. If there are other large contributors that you can think of please speak up.

The results:2mm – 2.65mm – 6.898mm – 10.911mm -13.57

The position of the photons was plotted in a scatter plot using excel. The MCPs have a pad size of ~12mm X ~12mm. All plots are in μm. These plots show that most of the photons are arriving on the pads and misses only happens at the 11mm radiator.

Page 2: Npe from David Yu’s Cherenkov simulationpsec.uchicago.edu/Simulation/camden_results.doc · Web viewI used David’s simulation of the production of Cherenkov radiation to estimate
Page 3: Npe from David Yu’s Cherenkov simulationpsec.uchicago.edu/Simulation/camden_results.doc · Web viewI used David’s simulation of the production of Cherenkov radiation to estimate
Page 4: Npe from David Yu’s Cherenkov simulationpsec.uchicago.edu/Simulation/camden_results.doc · Web viewI used David’s simulation of the production of Cherenkov radiation to estimate
Page 5: Npe from David Yu’s Cherenkov simulationpsec.uchicago.edu/Simulation/camden_results.doc · Web viewI used David’s simulation of the production of Cherenkov radiation to estimate