nsf data management plan case study: uva’s response
DESCRIPTION
A. Sallans. "NSF Data Management Plan Case Study: UVa’s Response." Presented at the 2011 Research Data Access and Preservation Summit. 31 March 2011TRANSCRIPT
Andrew Sallans
Head of Strategic Data Initiatives / Scientific Data Consulting Group (SciDaC)
University of Virginia Library
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit
31 March 2011
NSF Data Management Plan Case
Study: UVa’s Response
Outline
1. DMP templates
2. Advising/consulting with researchers
3. Expansion of DMP Online tool
2
Our organization
3
Mostly a virtual organization, coordination is priority
University Libraries
Scientific Data Consulting Group (2 FTE, 2 PTE)
Professional School Data Librarians
Subject Librarians
Attorney
IR Team
VP/Chief Information Officer
Info Security, Policy, and Records Office
Other infrastructure managers (ie. storage, networks, etc.)
Office VP for Research
Office of Sponsored Programs
NSF Data Management Plans
New NSF Directorates/Divisions continue to release
and specify guidelines
Education and Human Resources (EHR)
Engineering (ENG)
Geological Sciences (GEO)
Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS)
Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (SBE)
4
DMP Templates Coordination of entire effort with VPR, CIO, and OSP
Inform researcher of the requirements for their respective directorate/program, try to help them make good decisions
Provide instructions for how to develop a DMP for that directorate/program (not just giving them a DMP)
Formatted template in the structure that is specified by the directorate/program (if not specified, use the general)
Encourage review/feedback on DMP draft from SciDaCbefore submission
We use a disclaimer to try and avoid liability for misunderstood advice or other points gone wrong
Available at: http://www.lib.virginia.edu/brown/data
5
Advising/Consulting to Researchers Aiming to get in the front of the research process, to reduce the
amount of extra work necessary for project wrap-up
Conducting data interviews/assessments (combination of many methods including UIUC/Purdue’s, DCC’s, and others) to establish a baseline with a given researcher
Involving subject librarians for collective learning and development of skills
Delivering a final assessment report and recommendations on data management process improvement to the researcher, with an open offer for consultation on how to implement the recommendations
6
Expansion of DMP Online Tool Recognition of need for
US version of DCC’s DMP Online Tool
Partnership developed between a number of institutions (CDL, UIUC, Smithsonian, UVa, DataONE, and DCC)
Seeking additional participation from many other institutions (already ICPSR)
7
DMP Online Tool (continued) 5 user types for system (Researcher, Editor, Funder Admin,
Institution Admin, Super Admin)
Multiple authentication options (using institutional options like Shibboleth as well as local system)
Starting with NSF DMP requirements, will expand to other funders quickly
Will provide institution-specific guidance, tied to authentication, and ideally make referral to local expertise
Open to everyone
Aiming to have a first version by around June (will be doing a big testing run first week of May with researchers and NSF officials at DataONE workshop)
Details available: http://www.cdlib.org/uc3/datamanagement/dmpo.html
8
Challenges ahead… (a selection)
9
Tighter coordination of services and support across the
institution
Data ownership issues
Balance of priority (benefit to the institution or the
researcher/community?)
Alignment of these efforts with community, national,
international efforts for data management
Funding of the support services (part of overhead costs?)
Thank you!Andrew Sallans
Head of Strategic Data Initiatives / Scientific Data Consulting Group
University of Virginia Library
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: asallans
http://www.lib.virginia.edu/brown/data
10