nywea 2019 standardizing sustainability: capturing data for nyc … annual... · 2019-02-17 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Standardizing Sustainability:Capturing Data for NYC DEP Projects to
Help Deliver a Sustainable NYCErika Jozwiak, ENV SP, LEED GA (NYCDEP)
Robert Pape, P.E., (AECOM)Amy Canova, LEED AP B+C (AECOM)
February 6, 2019
NYWEA 2019
Agenda
Sustainability at DEP• DEP Vision• Incorporation in Project
Delivery• Standard Operating
Procedures
SOPs & Case Studies• Energy Reduction• Recycled and Regional
Material
Program-wide Performance• Metrics• Trends• Next Steps
Sustainability at DEP
DEP Vision Statement
To be a world class water and wastewater utility, while building a
sustainable future for all New Yorkers
AIR, NOISE, AND HAZARDOUS WASTE• Update and enforce the Air Code to reduce local
emissions, and regulate hazardous waste and noise pollution
About NYC DEP
WATER SUPPLY• Deliver 1.1 billion gallons of water to 9.6 million New
Yorkers every day and maintain 7,000 miles of water mains
• Protect our 2,000 square mile watershed, including 19 reservoirs and three controlled lakes
WASTEWATER TREATMENT• Treat 1.3 billion gallons of wastewater each day• Operate and maintain 14 plants, 96 pumping stations,
and 7,500 miles of sewers
Capital Construction
• 10-year Capital Plan: $19.4 billion
• Includes the Bureau of Engineering Design and Construction’s projects in construction or design
• Provide in-house engineering design and project management services for DEP’s water supply, distribution, and treatment divisions
Triple-Bottom Line
EconomicSocial
Environmental
DEP
BEDC
PMO
ESD
Sustainability Section
Agency: Dept. of Environmental Protection
Bureau: Engineering, Design & Construction
Office: Program Management
Division: Engineering Standards
Sustainability Section
OneNYC
Growth
Equity
Sustainability
Resiliency
Vision 1: Our Growing, Thriving CityNew York City will continue to be the world’s most dynamic urban economy where families, businesses, and neighborhoods thrive
Vision 2: Our Just and Equitable CityNew York City will have an inclusive, equitable economy that offers well-paying jobs and opportunity for all to live with dignity and security
Vision 3: Our Sustainable CityNew York City will be the most sustainable big city in the world and a global leader in the fight against climate change
Vision 4: Our Resilient CityOur neighborhoods, economy, and public services are ready to withstand and emerge stronger from the impacts of climate change and other 21st century threats
Regulatory ComplianceLocal Law 22 of 2008 – 30% Reduction in Energy / GHG from City Funded Projects by 2030
Local Law 84, 85, 87, 88 of 2009 – Greener, Greater Buildings Package
Local Law 20 of 2011 – Rooftop solar analysis
Local Law 130 of 2013 – Electric vehicle charging stations
Local Law 66 of 2014 – 80% Reduction in Energy / GHG from City Funded Projects by 2050
Local Law 6 of 2016 – Geothermal Analysis
Local Law 24 of 2016 – Solar panel feasibility study for City buildings
Local Law 31 of 2016 – Low Energy Intensity City Building
Local Law 32 of 2016 – Updates Green Building Policy, expands jurisdiction
Local Law 97 of 2017 – MS4 Permit
Categories
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Energy
• Climate Change
• Environmental Impacts
• Sustainable Sites
11
Project Delivery Timeline
Planning Design Construction Operation
Workshop 1
Workshop 2
Sustainable SitesEnergyClimate ChangeEnvironmental ImpactsGreenhouse Gas Emissions
Reporting Requirements
Planning Design Construction Operation
Case Study 1: Hunts Point WRRF Resiliency
Energy Conservation
Goals and Expectation
Energy Analysis
Benchmark
Baseline
Identify Viable ECMs
Energy Conservation
Measures
Design
Build
Operate
Establish Institutional
ControlsEnergy SOP for
Designs
Energy Operations & Design Policy
Construction
Energy O&M and Training
Typical Design Evaluations
• Reliability• Vendor/Manufacturer Reliability• Operation Complexity• Maintenance Requirements• Durability• Expense (including lifecycle)
Energy Considerations Added
• GHG Emissions vs. Lifecycle Costs
• Level of GHG emissions
• Energy Consumption vs. Lifecycle Costs
• Criteria Pollutants
• Develop Energy Conservation and GHG reduction SOPs for all construction projects
• Develop Energy Operations and Design Policies: Design kick-off meetings, BODR, all design milestones, and Bid Docs
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS
SOP and Policy Development
Policy Objectives
• Energy/GHG reductions from electro-mechanical processes
• Facility Layout (i.e. minimize pumping distances, blowers near discharge, etc.)
• Maximize ADG production and use• Control/Operational Strategies
(pumping, DO control)• Energy Source Conversion (heat recovery,
preheating sludge with digester effluent)• Process emissions and energy
(side stream treatment)
Design Services Goals
• Develop design options that consider energy• Generate an energy profile report• Baseline current condition energy consumption
and GHG emissions• Using direct measurements• Modeling• Predicted Future energy conditions via modeling• Perform an economic analysis for each option
Construction Phase
• Mindful of change orders• Identify modification that will affect energy/GHG• Existing analysis• New additions not previously investigated• Energy/GHG increases = 0 unless justified
Meeting Design Intent Operationally
• Identify the operational design intent with respects to energy and GHG emissions:
• Process (i.e. thickener operations or DO control strategies)
• Target operational set point• Maintenance requirements to keep
efficiencies high• Operational requirements:
Energy and systems monitoring
Evaluation Metrics
• Capital Cost per unit Energy Saved and metric ton of CO2(e) avoided
• Annual energy savings• Percent change in energy consumption and
GHG emissions• Simple payback• Lifecycle Costs (incl. O&M, escalation, and
useful life)• Net Present Value • Cash Flow Evaluation
Case Study: Hunts Point Resiliency
• NYC Wastewater Resiliency Program:• Hunts Point WWTP, Bronx, NY
• Minor flooding from Hurricane Sandy - floodwaters reached EL. +12.2 ft
• East River overtopped southern plant wall; flooded roadways• West Effluent Water Building flooded; electrical equipment
damaged
• 100-year flood event poses high risk of flood damage• Key strategies:
• Seal buildings• Elevate equipment• Construct flood barriers• Flood-proof equipment• Replace equipment as part of asset management upgrades
Case Study: Hunts Point Resiliency
• Energy efficiency improvements• Replace scum pumps in-kind
• Explosion proof
• Submersible
• Improved energy efficiency• Remove seal pumps entirely; no longer required for new
submersible scum pumps
• Sustainability KPIs• Energy = 20% reduction from baseline (existing conditions)• Emissions = 20% reduction from baseline (existing
conditions)
Case Study: Hunts Point Resiliency
Greeley and Hansen Design Engineers
MT/Yr
Case Study: Hunts Point Resiliency
Project is small with regards to energy reduction potential and had limited opportunities but…
IMPROVEMENTS WERE POSSIBLE
Case Study 2: Jerome Park Aqueduct
Rehabilitation
Case study: JRAQ-REH
• Jerome Reservoir and Aqueduct Rehabilitation, Bronx, NY
• Design complete, currently in final approval stage before going out to bid
• Purpose: improve water quality, improve site safety, maintain functionality of reservoir
• Scope of Work includes: • Structural rehabilitation
of reservoir walls• Repairs to retaining walls• Installation of diversion pipe• New fence and guiderail
between gatehouses 6 & 7• Roadway surface
and drainage improvements
Case study: Jerome Park Reservoir
SOP 056 Recycled and Regional Content for New Materials
• Purpose: Reduce embodied energy of new materials; reduce GHG emissions associated with transportation; and stimulate local markets
• Preliminary Sustainability Workshop sets initial KPI, e.g. 20% recycled / 60% regional (based on total weight (tons) of new materials)
• Design engineer required to evaluate recycled and regional opportunities
• What materials will be used?• Can they contain recycled content?• Where do they come from?
• Develop a Recycled and Regional Content Plan that summarizes likelihood of achieving goals set at PSW
• Did we meet our targets?• If not, can we identify further opportunities?• Do we need to adjust the goal?
• Submitted prior to Deep Dive Sustainability Workshop (SOP 051)
• Excludes mechanical, electrical, and plumbing components• For new materials only – construction waste is covered by
SOP 057
Case study: Recycled Content
• Data per 90% design submission and may change as design develops to final design.
• Note that this project started in 2016 – tables for capturing this information have since been updated and can be found in e-Builder.
• At DEP’s direction and to comply with NSF 61 Components, concrete that is in contact with potable water shall not contain recycled content (fly ash) due to potential leaching issues
Material:Total Weight
(tons)
Recycled Content Estimate
(tons)
Recycled Content Actual (tons)
Recycled Content
Estimate (%)
Recycled Content
Actual (%)
Concrete See Note 1 N/A N/AConcrete* 5,928 0 0Steel 20 6 28.9**Rebar 20 6 28.9Flowable Fill*** 1,518 1,260 83Mortar 38 6 15East Basin Outlet Flowable Fill*
1,109 920 83
North Basin Access Ramp new concrete
60 9 15
Schedule 80 PVC diversion pipe
45 0 0
Steel Pipe 6 2 28.9Steel Fence 48 14 28.9Box beam guiderail 20 6 28.9Parking lot new asphalt
697 0 0
Total: 9,510 2,228 23.43%Proposed Target: 20%
What materials will the project use?
Determine recycled content using actual % or estimates listed in SOP 056
Compare Estimate versus Target
Case study: Regional Content
MaterialSource
Distance (miles)
Envision Source
Distance (miles)
Estimated Quantity
(tons)Cost ($)
Regional Materials
Estimate ($)
Concrete 50 100 7,787Contractor to add costs
Steel 500 500 20Rebar 500 500 20Flowable fill 50 50 13,660Mortar 50 500 38East Basin Outlet Flowable Fill
50 50 9,978
Box beam guiderail 500 500 21Schedule 80 PVC Diversion Pipe
200 500 45
Steel Pipe 500 500 6Steel Fence 500 500 48Parking lot asphalt 500 500 697Total: 32,320% Compliant: 100%Proposed Target: 60%
Material Distance Requirement
Soils and mulches 50 miles
Aggregates, sands 50 miles
Concrete 100 miles
Plants (landscaping) 250 miles
Other materials (excluding equipment) 500 miles
Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing N/A
SOP 056 now uses weight (tons) for Regional Content, not cost
Criteria align with Envision requirements
Compare Estimate versus Target
Data per 90% design submission and may change as design develops to final design.
Case study: Specifications
• Recycled and Regional content goals are included in specifications • 01357 – Sustainability Goals and Procedures (5-digit)• 01 81 13 – Sustainability Goals and Procedures (6 digit)
• Bid Package includes Recycled and Regional Content Plan for information only, to assist Contractor to price accordingly
• Specifications require a Preliminary and Final Recycled and Regional Content plan be developed by Contractor
• Information captured via use of Environmental Materials Reporting Form (EMRF) – Attachment A of 01357/018113
Case study: Procurement
Overall Program Performance
Energy and Emissions
30% by 2017 30% by 2017
80% by 2050 80% by 2050
Energy & Emissions
Recycled and Regional Content
Recycled Content
Drivers• Embodied energy
• GHG emissions
• Sustainable procurement practices
Method • SOP launched 2016
• Specifications
Metrics• Material quantity
• Recycled content (% weight)
180K tons
Regional Content
100 mi.
50K Tons
Next Steps
Next Steps
• Envision v3• Construction phase tracking
• Forecasting new regulatory requirements
• SOP 053 – Energy & GHG• Non-process and process loads
separated• Real time metering
• SOP 056 – Recycled & Regional Material• Sustainable procurement • New procedure for soil reuse
Acknowledgements
www.nyc.gov/dep facebook.com/nycwater twitter.com/nycwater
Dennis J. Stanford, PE., ENV SP Chief, Engineering Standards, [email protected]
Sara Igielski, E.I.T, ENV SP
Greeley & [email protected]
Claudia TobonHuman Resources Clerk, [email protected]
Tom LongDirector of Program Management Office, [email protected]
www.nyc.gov/dep facebook.com/nycwater twitter.com/nycwater
Erika Jozwiak, ENV SP, LEED Green Assoc.
Sustainability Section Chief (Acting), [email protected]
Amy Canova, LEED AP BD+C
Technical Leader – Sustainability, Buildings + Places, NY Metro, [email protected]
Rob Pape, P.E.
Senior Technical Specialist, [email protected]