nzwinegrower oct/nov 2013

84
O C T O B E R / N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 3 QUAKE LESSONS HIGH END CHARDONNAY WATER BATTLE BIO SECURITY THREATS THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF NEW ZEALAND WINEGROWERS ISSUE 82 OCTOBER / NOVEMBER 2013 NEW ZEALAND WINEGROWER ISSUE 82

Upload: rural-newsgroup

Post on 02-Mar-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

OC

TO

BE

R / NOVEMBER

20

13

QUA K E L E S S ON S ✽ H IG H E N D C H A R D ON N AY ✽ WAT E R B AT T L E ✽ BIO S E C U R I T Y T H R E AT S

TH

E O

FF

ICIA

L J

OU

RN

AL

OF

NE

W Z

EA

LA

ND

WIN

EG

RO

WE

RS

ISS

UE

82

OC

TO

BE

R / N

OV

EM

BE

R 2

013

NE

W Z

EA

LA

ND

WIN

EG

RO

WE

R

ISSUE

82

Page 2: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

Mealybugs! You can run but you can’t hide.

Even the most stubborn and persistent Mealybugs have no escape from the unique action of Movento. Movento’s 2-way systemic control spreads throughout the entire plant hunting down pests in the most difficult to reach places ensuring your grape crops are free from this potentially devastating pest.

Ask for Movento by Bayer CropScience. Contact your nearest field representative for more information or call toll free: 0800 33 44 60.

BA

C10

32

Movento 100SC® is registered pursuant to the AVCM Act 1997, No P8434 and to the HSNO Act 1996, No HSR100545. Movento 100SC® is a registered trademark of the Bayer Group. ®Priority Partnership is a registered trademark of Nufarm Ltd. ©Bayer CropScience 2013.

www.cropscience.bayer.co.nz

BAC 1032 Movento 2013 - Press NZWinegrower_297x210_ƒ.indd 1 7/19/13 5:17 PM

O-I NZ created New ZealaNd’s fIrst glass recyclINg prOgram IN 1973, pre-datINg legIslatION by mOre thaN 30 years. we kNOw sustaINabIlIty Is ImpOrtaNt tO the New ZealaNd wINe INdustry aNd we share that gOal.

O - I N E W Z E A L A N D TE L : 0800 263 390 , +64 9 976 7100 EMA I L : s a l e s . n z@ap .o - i . com

www.o - i . com www.g l a s s i s l i f e . com www. f acebook . com/G la s s I s L i f e

O-I NZ has dIVerted OVer 1.6 mIllION tONNesOf glass frOm laNdfIll

61706 NZ Winegrowers Ad PRESS.indd 1 24/09/13 4:31 PM

Page 3: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

FEATURES

10 Bio Security Threats Since Psa devastated the kiwifruit industry,

there have been many wondering if a similar event is on the horizon for the wine industry. What are the treats facing us and how do we prepare for them?

14 Earthquake Lessons The swarm of earthquakes that hit

Marlborough earlier this year were a wake-up call not only for the region, but for all wine producers. There were common themes in the damage incurred and winery engineer Paul Gibbs says there are lessons to be learned.

16 The Water Battle Lines are Drawn

Water will become one of the industry’s most valuable assets in the years ahead. Already the battle over who is allowed to take what, is looming in Hawke’s Bay. Mary Shanahan investigates.

54 SWNZ Benchmarking Comparing yourself against other

businesses is one of the best ways of determining if you are on the right track. SWNZ benchmarking for wineries and vineyards is allowing members of the wine industry to do just that.

REGULARS

4 Editorial Tessa Nicholson

6 Regional Viewpoint Paul Donaldson – Waipara

8 In Brief News from around the country

44 Sommelier’s Corner Cameron Douglas MS

48 Bob’s Blog Bob Campbell MW

66 Not On The Label Legal Matters with Marija Batistich, Bell Gully

73 Calendar Wine happenings in New Zealand

76 Research Supplement The latest science and research projects funded by NZWinegrowers

Cover Shot: Fromm Winery, Marlborough. Supplied by NZWinegrowers

14

60

I S S U E 8 2 CONTENTS

24

38

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 3

Page 4: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

4 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

FROM THE EDITOR TESSA NICHOLSON

EDITOR Tessa [email protected]

CORRESPONDENTS

Auckland: Joelle Thomson [email protected]

Gisborne: Christine [email protected]

Hawkes Bay: Mary Shanahan [email protected]

Nelson: Neil Hodson [email protected]

Canterbury: Jo Burzynska [email protected]

Central Otago: Max Marriott [email protected]

ADVERTISING

Sales Manager:Ted [email protected]: 07 854 6292Mobile: 021 832 505

Upper North Island:Stephen [email protected]: 09 913 9637Mobile: 021 963 166

Lower North Island:Mark MacfarlanePh: 04 234 6239Mobile: 021 453 914

South Island:Kaye Sutherland [email protected]: 03 376 5552Mobile: 021 221 1994

CIRCULATION &

SUBSCRIPTIONS

Lorraine Rudelj [email protected] Ph: 09 303 3527 Fax: 09 302 2969

New Zealand Winegrowers PO Box 90 276, Auckland Mail Centre, New Zealand

PUBLISHING &

PRE-PRESS

Rural News Group PO Box 3855, Auckland 1140 Ph: 09 307 0399

Location: Top Floor, 29 Northcroft Street, Takapuna, Auckland 0622

Publisher: Brian Hight

Managing Editor: Adam Fricker

Production: Dave Ferguson,

Rebecca Williams

Published by Rural News Group Ltd under authority of New Zealand Winegrowers (jointly representing Wine Institute of New Zealand Inc and New Zealand Grape Growers Council Inc). Unless directly attributed, opinions expressed in the magazine are not necessarily those of Rural News Group and/or its directors or management, New Zealand Winegrowers or its constituent organisations.

Published every second month. One free copy is mailed to every member of the Institute, the Council, the New Zealand Society of Viticulture & Oenology and the New Zealand Vine Improvement Group, and to such other persons or organisations as directed by the owners, with provision for additional copies and other recipients

to be on a subscription basis.

ISSN 1174-5223

I t was the second largest Bragato confer-ence held in the history of the event. Close to 600 people, including del-egates and trade, converged on Mar-

lborough for a conference that looked back at the past, in order to prepare for the future.

If there was an over riding message to come out, it was no one can be complacent as the industry moves forward. From viruses to wood diseases, chemical resistance to yield estimations, clones and rootstocks to under-vine management – the conference delved deep into what is important for growers.

But the big one to emerge on the last day was the potential of a bio security threat. Research-ers are closely monitoring what the biggest threats are and why. For the first time this issue we take a look at the five big ones, what they are, what they could do and most importantly what they look like.

Having heard the consequences of Psa on the kiwifruit industry, the fear of what an unknown pest or disease could do to our wine industry was palpable throughout the room. Vigilance is ever important when it comes to preventing such a disaster. Especially given the majority of threats could arrive in New Zealand as a hitch hiker. In other words they could come in via aircraft holds, on ships, shipping containers and imported cars to mention just a few.

The wine industry needs to be pro active in preventing these threats. Hoping it won’t happen isn’t an option. As Peter Baines, the founder of Hands Across the Water said in his highly motivational speech, “Hope is not a plan!”

We are aware that the Glassy-winged

sharpshooter which decimated Californian vineyards, has made its way to the Cook Islands. Given the high volume of traffic between there and New Zealand, the chances of it making its way to our shores are high.

But there are others including the Spot-ted-winged Drosophilia, the Brown Marm-orated Stink Bug, the European Grapevine Moth and Vine Mealy Bug to name a few.

The cost of an incursion would be in the millions of dollars, NZW CEO Philip Gregan said. Any delay between discovering some-thing strange in your vineyard and notifying experts, means the cost rises exponentially.

Whether the indus-try could cope with such a financial burden remains to be seen.

Eradication may seem like the answer – but as New Zealand has

learned from other countries, that’s an easy thing to talk about, not so easy to achieve.

So if nothing else this month, please take time to look at the major risks to New Zealand. Ensure your staff know what these pests look like and if you or them see any-thing faintly resembling them – ensure that you get in touch with the powers that be, whether that is MPI, NZWinegrowers or the Exotic Pest and Diseases Hotline.

On a completely different note, this month we also take a look at the lessons learned from the recent Marlborough earth-quakes. While the damage was devastating for those wineries involved, it could have been far worse if the quake had been centred closer to Blenheim. A winery engineer who visited the region shortly after the August 16 event, says there were common themes in the damage and there are lessons for all wine regions to take from it. ■

NO TIME FOR COMPLACENCY

No one can be complacent as the industry moves forward. From viruses to wood diseases, chemical resistance to yield estimations, clones and rootstocks to undervine management.

Page 5: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 5

FROM THE BOARD STEVE GREEN

T he last 12 months have been a real turning point for the industry. The end result is a greater level of

optimism than at Bragato a year ago.

In the past year a strong sales performance combined with the smaller 2012 vintage has brought some much needed tension back into the supply demand balance. Grape prices have risen and prof-itability of growers has improved markedly – this is great news for the industry’s key supplier base.

On the wine side there was something of a swing back to packaging product in New Zea-land, while for bulk wine export-ers there was a definite rise in value. The dollar also appears to be relenting against the US cur-rency, this is very good news in one of our key growth markets.

There is now a cautious opti-mism that pervades in the sector. This was reflected in the results from our recent Members’ Sur-vey. 87% of respondents said they viewed the business outlook for the next 12 months as okay or bet-ter. Even the most negative group in this survey, our small wineries, still had an optimism rating of 79%.

These scores reflect the dra-matic change in industry con-fidence that the past year has brought. It is of course important we do not get ahead of ourselves, but we are much better to be pull-ing back on confidence than pull-ing out vines.

Our Members’ Survey also highlighted the value that growers and wineries place on the infor-mation that NZ Winegrowers provide to them. All groups were uniformly positive about the value of that information with 95% view-ing the information provided as okay or better. This is a very strong pointer that information such as our grape price data, the vineyard

register, recent viticultural moni-toring reports, the monthly export data are important tools in busi-ness decision makiing for growers and wineries.

Less positively there was a clear ‘do better’ message for Sus-tainable Winegrowing from the Survey. There is clear support for sustainability, but there was some consistent and significant negative ratings around Sustainable Wine-growing New Zealand. In the year ahead we will address the issues of compliance, cost, and relevance to ensure this programme retains the support of the industry.

The Members’ Survey was just one aspect of us doing business differently consequent to the new Strategic Plan we now have

in place. There were lots of other changes as well – we downsized our Australian office, we refocused our London office in Europe and we opened a new office in Hong Kong. We are putting together a Primary Growth Partnership application and, in the next few weeks we are investing further in our Advocacy team when we open an office in Wellington for

the first time.One of the key initiatives last

year was our involvement in the Cheers! Programme. Cheers is an initiative with brewers and distillers in New Zealand to pro-mote better behaviours around the consumption of products involv-ing alcohol.

I believe the wine sector has always been an exemplar for social responsibility. The focus on qual-ity before quantity, on wine and food matching, our commitment to hospitality all show the way forward for the wider New Zea-land community in terms of social responsibility.

However, we cannot rest on our laurels as the forces opposed to the responsible and enjoyable

consumption of wine (and other products containing alcohol) are becoming ever more strident about alcohol issues. Cheers is about individual and social responsibility, it is about really making a difference in that area of behaviour change. It is something we are deeply committed too.

Our business is about places and people. Places such as Cen-tral Otago where I come from, Waipara, Nelson, Hawkes Bay or wherever.

It is our places and our people that provide interest and nuance to New Zealand wine. Regional dif-ferences are an essential part of our industry and our people, the grape growers and winemakers who use their skills to export and celebrate those differences are an integral part of the New Zealand story.

The people are our grapegrow-ers and winemakers who grow the grapes and craft the wine from each of these regions and sub regions to produce distinctive, high quality and sustainable wines. Our success in doing this – in pro-ducing wines that are unique and distinctive but at all times New Zealand – is the reason we have now grown exports to $1.2 billion per annum. It is the reason exports will continue to grow strongly in the future.

Our people transform the potential of our land into the reality of the 2.5 billion glasses of New Zealand wine that are served around the world each year. ■

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF NZWINEGROWERS ADDRESS TO THE BRAGATO CONFERENCE

However, we cannot rest on our laurels as the forces opposed to the responsible and enjoyable consumption of wine (and other products containing alcohol) are becoming ever more strident.

Page 6: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

6 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

REGIONALVIEWPOINT

L ate winter and early spring always puts on such a great display of seasonal variation. Suddenly, I’ve noticed that I’m not driving home

in the dark. As the days are lengthening, the night time is shortening. Of course this is nothing new, and normally the opportunity this allows to squeeze in an extra hours pruning in a day is not really needed, even for those chasing their tails….. but this year is a bit different. I’ve just heard a report on the news that this is the warmest winter in New Zealand on record, with the aver-age temperatures in August more akin to those of September in a normal year. North Canterbury, and the Waipara Valley within it, is certainly not out-of-step with the national temperature, and the large mix of varieties and reasonable chance of a spring frost here means you are always sensitive to an early bud burst. So it’s full steam ahead, as something green is always going to shoot out of the early bursting varieties, mean-ing sleepless nights approach for those that frost fight. Be it by windmachine, water, or chopper, there’s simply no other option than to pull an all-nighter when the temperature drops, but thank god for the warming power of a bottle of Pinot, particularly after 2am.

Frost is just one of many battles the vigneron must face here. Another that seems to have been an all too repetitive occurrence, is that of consents, whether it’s water, land use, or a slew of other applicable resource

consents required to run a busi-ness. There always seems to be the arrival of letters sounding the alert of a forthcom-ing draft plan or hearing. They are forming a drift in my in-tray. The pow-ers that be never seem to rest on such things, though I’m sure that those in other regions have a similar story to tell!

Of course, spring time brings such a great feeling of anticipation. The prospect of another season rushing towards us, with the massive task of pruning behind you, but all the nerves of the frost and flowering season still to come. This means that I can never quite relax till mid-December. I think it’s a sign of the resurgent growth here in the Waipara Valley (slow resurgent growth… but definitely growth!) that for the first time there has been a somewhat consistent need to bring in out-of-district pruning teams for the big blocks, and they’ve whipped through with both speed and skill ( just like the locals…. Of course!).

Another thing we anticipate here is the seasonal shift of varietal consumption.

Maybe this is so subtle that when I say “we”, I really mean “I”, but as a region that produces a fair amount of both Pinot Noir, and aromatic varieties like Riesling, Pinot Gris (and yes, even Sauvi-gnon Blanc) I find it quite fun to watch the New Zealand prefer-ence swing from the winter warmer, to the crisp summer refresher. With the home market of Christchurch, this

summer is full of promise. The post-earth-quake landscape here saw a massive drop in restaurants and bars, however these are now back to 80% of the pre-quake levels, and the hospitality trade have certainly had time to think about the design of their new facili-ties. Some truly great and interesting places have started to emerge, and they are slowly creeping back towards the city centre. This has created a great mood of optimism in all of North Canterbury, as nothing builds antic-ipation more than a supportive home market that is in the early stages of what should be a flourishing rebuild. Fingers crossed the opti-mism for both the rebuild and the Waipara Valley/North Canterbury wines continues. ■

WAIPARAPA U L D O N A L D S O N

Paul Donaldson

0800 55 77 33 | [email protected] | www.aurora-nz.comCall us and experienCe our quality serviCe today.

Protect equiPment & reduCe maintenanCe this vintage

Our high-strength Force10™ Receival Bin Magnetic Separators remove common contaminants such as fencing staples, nails, harvester parts, wear particles and pieces of wire which damage equipment and cause costly downtime and unscheduled plant maintenance.

The AuRORA FORce10™ RAnge OFFeRS yOu The ulTiMATe MAgneTic SOluTiOn FOR ReMOving MeTAllic FOReign MATTeR FROM yOuR pROceSS.

“Unbelievable - there was half a bucket of debris - nails, staples, wire etc, accumulated in just one day! Certainly capex well spent.” Joe Babich - Babich Wines

Page 7: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

Pristine is registered pursuant to the ACVM Act 1997, P7595 ® Registered trademark of BASF

www.agro.basf.co.nz

TALK TO YOUR DISTRIBUTOR TODAY. Available from selected horticultural distributors. For more information, contact your local horticultural rep or BASF horticultural specialist, Weston Hazelwood, on 06 878 3373

PG7/

10

Why would you continue to use a fungicide that only does half the job?

Pristine® is the NEW fungicide that combines two exclusive BASF active ingredients – boscalid and F500® - for superior, DUAL ACTION control.

With two modes of action, Pristine® provides a built-in resistance strategy and twice the power and performance to increase crop yield and quality.

No other fungicide works harder or faster to protect the profitability of your business.

Pristine® sets a new benchmark for control of the three main diseases that affect grape production: botrytis, powdery mildew and downy mildew.

NEW Dual-Action Pristine out performs all others

Page 8: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

8 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

INSBRIEF

National

Two New Fellows Two members of the New Zealand wine industry have been inducted into the NZWinegrower’s Roll of Fellows. Stuart Smith, the former Chair of the NZW board is the first Marlburian to be honored, and along with Sir George Fistonich joins 21 other industry stalwarts. The Fellows were announced at the Romeo Bragato Conference.

Lucky Mud House Fan Part of America’s Cup Wayne Regan from Lower Hutt won the prize of a lifetime earlier this year, which enabled him to travel to San Francisco during the recent America’s Cup, courtesy of Mud House Wines. “When I received the telephone call and heard Mud House wine, my first thought was great, a case of wine or a dinner at a fancy restaurant. But no, to my amazement they started talking about return flights to San Francisco, accommodation, a dining experience and the ultimate of all; a trip out on the Bay to cheer on Emirates Team New Zealand.”Mud House were the official wine supplier to Emirates Team New Zealand during the battle on the water.

Award Judges Three international judges have been announced for this year’s Air New Zealand Wine Awards; US wine writer Dan Berger, Australian sommelier and consultant Sophie Otton and Swedish Master of Wine Madeleine Stenwreth (right). Between them and a large number of New Zealand judges, the panel will have more than 1300 wines to sniff, swirl and sip. Judging for the 2013 Air New Zealand Wine Awards will take place from 4 to 6 November in Auckland. The gold medal winning wines will be announced on 13 November and the trophy winning wines will be unveiled at a gala dinner, attended by New Zealand’s top winemakers and industry figures, on 23 November at the Queenstown Events Centre.

CorrectionApologies to Anita Ewart-Croy, whose photo we used in the last issue of NZWinegrower magazine. Featuring on page 16, we inadvertently credited it to someone other than her. The shot was taken while Anita was working at Kirkpatrick Estate Winery, and was chosen for exhibition in the annual Oeno Video Terror d’ Images competition in 2010.

Grape Growers Council Following no election for the NZ Grape Grower’s Council, the members are as follows:

John Clarke, Gisborne – President and NZW Board Member

Gwyn Williams, Waipara – Vice President and NZW Board member

Chris Howell, Hawke’s Bay NZW Board Member

Xan Harding – Hawke’s Bay

Dominic Pecchenino, Marlborough - NZW Board Member

Richard Rose, Marlborough – NZW Board Member

Doug Bell, Gisborne

Alan Knight, Gisborne

Rex Sunde, North Island Minor Regions Representative

James Dicey, South Island Minor Regions Representative

Page 9: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 9

Marlborough

WineWorks Marlborough Expands National wine industry bottling company, WineWorks Limited, has expanded its operations in Marlborough by acquiring the Wine Bottlers Marlborough site. The company has purchased the plant and equipment previously operated by Wine Bottlers Marlborough. Managing Director Tim Nowell-Usticke said

Wine Bottlers Marlborough will continue trading under that name. It will retain the same management team, and customers can expect day-to-day operations to be very much business as usual.

International Business FinalistsBoth Marisco Vineyards and Yealands Wine Group have been recognized for their outstanding international success and

are finalists in the International Business

Awards. Marisco Vineyard is in the ANZ Best

Business Operating Internationally –

$10m -$50m category, while Yealands Wine

Group is a finalist in the over $50m category.

It is the first time in four years that a winery

has made it to the finals. The winners were

to be announced in Auckland on September

26, after NZWinegrower went to print.

From The Falkland’s to The Wairarapa It’s a long way from the Falkland’s, but for David and Coleen Boyd, the move to the Wairarapa has been well worth the shift. They now have not only a vineyard but a newly developed wine label – Lynfer Estate. The couple bought 11 hectares of land at Gladstone, inland from Carterton in the northern Wairarapa in the 1990s and planted nine hectares in 2000. Their grapes include Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Gris and Pinot Noir and initially they sold it all to their neighbours, who made wine from these grapes. In 2009 that changed and since then the Boyds have struck a shared profit winemaking deal. The name Lynfer Estate is an amalgamation of their daughter’s names and sounds gaelic, which appealed to David, who was born in Ireland.

Martinborough

Toast Martinborough 2013Tickets are now on sale for this year’s Toast Martinborough, being held on November 17. Having promoted the region’s wines for 22 years, the event is one of the most iconic in New Zealand. For the first time Dry River Wines will join 10 others at the festival, teaming up with five star luxury lodge The Farm at Cape Kidnappers. Festival-goers can taste more than 70 wines from world-class boutique vineyards, sample more than 100 restaurant-quality dishes and dance to more than 22 live performances.

Grape Growers Council Following no election for the NZ Grape Grower’s Council, the members are as follows:

John Clarke, Gisborne – President and NZW Board Member

Gwyn Williams, Waipara – Vice President and NZW Board member

Chris Howell, Hawke’s Bay NZW Board Member

Xan Harding – Hawke’s Bay

Dominic Pecchenino, Marlborough - NZW Board Member

Richard Rose, Marlborough – NZW Board Member

Doug Bell, Gisborne

Alan Knight, Gisborne

Rex Sunde, North Island Minor Regions Representative

James Dicey, South Island Minor Regions Representative

Page 10: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

10 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

BIOSECURITY

T he world is becoming a smaller place, with increased travel, tourism, trade and immigration. And because of that, New Zealand is at far greater risk of

facing bio-security threats than ever before.If we needed any confirmation of that fact,

think back to the emergence of Psa in kiwi-fruit. A disease that was known to have devas-tated industries in Japan, Korea and Italy, first appeared in New Zealand in 2010. In August of this year, 75 percent of the country’s kiwifruit hectares are on an orchard associated with Psa. How it came here isn’t entirely clear, but the fact it did is a frightening reality check for all our primary producers.

Dr Jim Walker from Plant&Food Research in Hawke’s Bay says there have been other bio-security threats in the past few decades, the Painted Apple Moth in 1999 in particular.

“That incursion and the eradication pro-gramme that followed cost this country $62 m with some estimates saying the cost was as high as $90m. Would we get away with that again in terms of cost, or the whole reaction to aerial spraying of Auckland should another similar unwanted pest arrive? Despite the success of the programme, there was a lot of flak and public concern about that strategy, so we need to be very vigilant in terms of our biosecurity awareness and strategy.”

What is knocking at the door of the New Zealand Wine Industry?

Walker says there are three main areas we need to be concerned about; the phytoplasmas and bacteria, fungal pathogens and insects.

In terms of phytoplasmas and bacteria, the big ones to worry about are Flavescence dorée which is an insect vectored disease of grapes. Another is black wood, an organism which is also insect vectored. Both kill vines.

Black rot is a fungal pathogen, Walker says and pathogens are often extremely difficult to eradicate once present in the country.

“To prevent the establishment of important vine-damaging diseases we need both a secure front and back door. As we have learned from the Psa experience, it is very difficult to eradi-cate it, once it is established. So it’s a case of being very careful around the movement of plant material when it comes to pathogens.”

Then we come to insects – which he says provide a completely different challenge.

“They break borders more often, they have a diversity of life stages from the eggs to larvae and adult. Their behaviour is cryptic, they are mobile and they fly! They have resistant stages, so they can survive adverse conditions. And they are the perfect hitchhikers, which means they have got so many inanimate pathways (into New Zealand) from suitcases to shipping containers.”

Key Insects To Look Out For

Glassy-winged sharpshooter (GWSS)

This is large leafhooper, native to south-eastern America. The reason it is such a danger, is because as a vector it can transfer Pierce’s disease. Already it has decimated vineyards in California. A xylem feeder, it has a huge range of host plants, such as pittosporum, eucalyptus and citrus. The GWSS is an extremely strong

flyer and an equally strong vector for disease. While not present in New Zealand, there have been numerous reportings of GWSS in the Cook Islands.

Admittedly, you need both the GWSS and Pierce’s disease in the same country to impact on vineyards. But as Walker pointed out, we have no idea whether Pierce’s which is a bac-terium (Xylella fastidiosa) is already present in New Zealand.

“The thing with xylella is there are more than 300 host plant species and many of those are asymptomatic hosts. We don’t know if we have the bacterium but not the vector. But if the vector comes in, it could complete the whole cycle and cause major problems.”

Dealing with the disease isn’t an easy task. In countries already under siege, the Integrated Pest Management practices (IPM) have been undermined, as growers have had to take seri-

ous measures to counter the disease.“If you think about our pest management

programme in NZ Winegrowers, it is a very low input programme. Would we be able to deal with this disease and retain that low input?”

There is an egg parasitoid that has been effective in killing the GWSS biologically, but Walker says it is not suited to cool climates, such as New Zealand.

THE THREATS OF THE FUTURET E S S A N I C H O L S O N

Page 11: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 11

Spotted-winged Drosophilia Walker describes this insect as a very nasty one. It is a vinegar fly,

that lives for up to two weeks. The females can lay up to 300 eggs and there can be up to 10 generations in a season.

“It attacks earlier, as the fruit begins to mature. It has many hosts including berry fruit, grapes, stone fruit, kiwifruit and it has spread like wildfire through Europe and North America. While it is not found in the Southern Hemisphere yet, potentially via a fruit tray it may not be far away.”

The spotted-winged Drosophilia has a serrated ovipositor that is like a chainsaw, used to great effect on maturing fruit. The consequent wounds then expose the fruit to other pathogens and fungal diseases such as botrytis.

“If this entered New Zealand it would change our pre-harvest insecti-cide programmes as we would have to protect to prevent berry or reduce berry damage. If we get this here, it is a game changer for everyone, from the home gardener to the commercial exporters, and to you as grape growers.”

Brown Marmorated Stink Bug

Winemaking demands the very highest standards...

WORLD CLASS WINE • WORLD CLASS LOCATION • WORLD CLASS TRAINING

With our flexible study options it is now easy to study while you work. We offer on-campus, online and distance learning options for:

> Diploma in Viticulture and Wine Production >CertificateinVineyardPracticeStudents can go onto study the Bachelor of Viticulture and Oenology (Awarded by Lincoln University)

nmit.ac.nz Search keywords: ‘Viticulture’

0800 422 733Krystal Millar - Diploma in Viticulture & Wine Production (Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology) and Lincoln University Bachelor of Viticulture and Oenology, CELLAR HAND & LAB ASSISTANT, YEALANDS ESTATE

ENROL NOWNew Zealand’s specialist land-based university

Page 12: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

12 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

Very like a shield bug in shape, this was first found in the US in the late 1990s. Now it is present in more than 35 states, with extremely high population densities. It feeds on a wide range of host plants, from apples to citrus, figs to grapes.

When they feed on grapes, they damage berries, which impacts on the ensuing wines. What is worse, is if they are collected with the grapes at harvest and crushed with the fruit. In this case the wine taint could be significant.

They are the classic hitchhiker Walker says, easily transported in suitcases, or shipping containers.

T h e r e h a v e a l r e a d y b e e n f i v e identifications of this bug in New Zealand. It is not easy to get rid of either.

“In apples in the US, up to 13 pyrethroid insecticides are required to control this. And even with those 13 treatments there was 10 percent fruit damage. It has completely destroyed IPM programmes.”European Grapevine Moth

Native to Italy, this moth has spread throughout Europe. In 2008 it was found on grapes in Chile and in 2009 it was discovered in the Napa Valley, California.

Hosts include olives, apples, kiwifruit, cherries, persimmons and grapes.

Larvae feed inside berries, hollowing them out and leaving only skin and seeds. The risk to fruit health and potential botrytis epidemics are obvious.

Walker says it is an insect that could easily be introduced via fruit imports.

Page 13: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 13

Vine Mealy BugThis is of considerable concern to

winegrowers throughout New Zealand. Originally emanating from Europe, it has

now spread to California, and South Africa. It is spread via budwood and equipment. With a broad host range, it has four to five generations per year.

“And the damage – whole bunches literally shrivel and eventually it kills the vine. It is a significant vector of grape leafroll virus, so we need to be vigilant.”

While Walker admits the large number of devastating diseases waiting around the corner is a bleak message, there are ways we can combat the threat.

Everyone needs to be vigilant, surveillance programmes need to be optimised, and early detection is paramount for an eradication programme to be successful.

As a grower you need to be aware of what to look for. If you discover something you are unsure about, don’t just kill the insect, capture it, and get professional advice.

The following is a number all growers should have in their workplace – Exotic Pest and Disease Emergency Hotline – 0800 80 99 66. Don’t be afraid to use it. ■ [email protected]

and finishes with big savings.Fendt tractors deliver ultimate efficiency through innovative technology. With a horsepower range between 70hp – 360hp these tractors deliver more from less, resulting in big savings.

With Vario CVT transmission and a host of industry-leading features, Fendt tractors provide maximum output and operator comfort. Fendt technology means superior performance and big savings for maximum profitability.

For more information contact your local dealer today!

Efficiencystarts here...

FENDT is a worldwide brand of AGCO Corporation

www.fendt.co.nz Freecall: 0800 828 872

Page 14: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

14 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

QUAKEUPDATE

T he swarm of earthquakes that hit Marlborough dur-ing July and August was a wake-up call not only for

the region, but for all wine produc-ers throughout the country. New Zealand hasn’t earned the nick-name of “shakey isles” for noth-ing and there are very few places throughout the country that are immune to sudden and strong earth movements.

In Marlborough, the first big quake occurred on July 21, meas-uring 6.5 and located 17km deep, centred in Cook Strait. The second major one was four weeks later on August 16, measuring 6.6, 10 kms deep and on land near Seddon.

While the damage from the first one was minimal, the August event was a different story. Win-eries closer to the epicentre were hit hard, with millions of dollars worth of damage to tanks and walkways. The further west of the epicentre, the less damage incurred.

Paul Gibbs is a winery engineer for Transfield Worley and he says there were common themes in the damage he saw in the region.

“The vast majority of dam-age and subsequent causes of wine losses, was associated with leg mounted tanks, (capacity 20,000 – 60,000 litres) that were fabricated in the early 2000’s. The legs on many of these tanks were subject to local bending and com-pression failures. There were also some punching shear failures of the centre legs.”

Gibbs said the tanks with longer legs or with a “threaded

foot” detail appeared more likely to fail.

“While most of the failures were observed on legs that were not braced, failure was also observed on some tanks that had their legs braced.”

In contrast, properly detailed plinth mounted tanks generally performed well. Yielding bolts that were designed to stretch did their job relieving some of the energy of the earthquake, and while bolt stretch was evident, there was little or no damage to the tanks.

Given the timing of the earth-quakes, many wineries had already emptied a number of tanks, which probably saved further losses.

In many wineries, damage to catwalks was apparent, which Gibbs says has to do with the design.

“A number of the catwalks have been installed so they are rigidly fixed to tanks. So basically when either the tank or walkway moved in different directions, they just ripped off and caused the walkway to buckle.”

The lesson learned from that, is that walkways and piperacks need to be seismically isolated from the tanks. This will allow the walkways and tanks to move independently of each other during a seismic event, rather than impacting or tearing apart as commonly seen after August 16.

What was interesting to Gibbs, was the fact that while many tanks and walkways suffered severe damage, the rest of the winer-ies infrastructure and buildings

TANKS THE MAJOR CASUALTY OF QUAKET E S S A N I C H O L S O N

A number of walkways were severely buckled after the quake.

Page 15: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 15

were generally okay. He says in the case of tanks, it indicates they may have not been designed for an equivalent seismic event that the buildings had been designed for. That may be due to them being purchased with “cost of produc-tion the main driver.”

The ground accelerations across Marlborough varied greatly, attenuating quickly depending on the wineries location from Sed-don, explaining why a tank in Riv-erlands was damamged and one in Renwick wasn’t.

“The peak ground accelera-tions measured near the epicen-tre were approximately 15 times greater than those measured near Blenheim. This raises the ques-tion; How much damage and losses would a similar sized earth-quake located nearer to Blenheim, where there is a greater density of wineries, have caused?”

If there is one overriding lesson learned, it is tank design is crucial if you want to restrict wine losses.

“Although it does not appear an issue of poor fabrication or manufacturing, it would appear that some leg mounted tanks fabricated in the early 2000’s, common throughout M a r l b o r o u g h , m ay n o t b e sufficiently robust to withstand a moderately sized earthquake and may represent an unnecessarily high risk of failure and product

loss during their lifetime,” Gibbs says.

The obligations under the Building Act and its associated codes and standards are not clear when it comes to the design of tanks, nor is how the insurance industry will assess the seismic design strength or lack thereof in future events

Moving forward, he says simply repairing a damaged tank on a ‘like for like’ basis will likely result in a similar outcome for a similar sized and location earthquake.

“But it has to be remembered that if the quake had been centred closer to Blenheim, the damage to these tanks and the resulting wine losses could have been cata-strophic.”

He adds that any modification and strengthening work under-taken now, should be properly engineered to ensure tanks are brought up to the desired seis-mic level.

“You also need to be careful that the proposed fixes are not going to just shift the failure point to somewhere else in the tank where the consequences could be worse. That includes simply stiffening up the legs of a tank which may just shift the stress to the tank floor and wall, increasing the chance of the tank rupturing and losing its contents.” ■[email protected]

Typical tank damage experienced during the Marlborough earthquake.

Many of our customers, and no doubt

yours, are far off the beaten track. But with

our worldwide services, relay connections

and end-to-end intermodal links, there’s

nowhere we can’t reach.

For hands on help from our local experts:

Outbound: 0503 222 444

Inbound: 0508 333 666

Always happy to go out of our way.

www.hamburgsud-line.com

Page 16: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

16 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

REGIONSHAWKE’S BAY

W ater use is becoming an increasingly fraught issue in Hawke’s Bay as growers along the

lower reaches of the Tukituki River battle proposed new regu-lations they believe will threaten their future livelihoods.

Vineyard owner Xan Harding says he and other growers down-stream of Red Bridge, behind Te Mata Peak, have become the “pawns” in plans to dam a tribu-tary of the Tukituki River for irri-gation.

Pernod Ricard and Indevin are just two of a number of other affected vineyard owners on the narrow corridor of stony soils flanking the lower Tukituki River.

The Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s proposal is to construct an 85m high dam on the Makaroro River as part of its proposed Rua-taniwha water storage scheme.

Supporters say there is strong interest in buying water from the regional council’s investment company and that many farmers on the Ruatahinwha Plains at the

top of the Tukituki catchment have signed non-binding expres-sions of interest. The proposed date for water delivery is 2017.

While it is neutral on the dam construction itself, Hawke’s Bay Winegrowers has jointly prepared a submission with Horticulture New Zealand to the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) on the regional council’s contentious Plan Change 6, which works in tandem with the dam proposal to introduce new rules for nutri-ent management and water allo-

cation throughout the Tukituki catchment.

The Ruataniwha water storage scheme and Plan Change 6 are the regional council’s response to the National Policy Statement (NPS) for Freshwater Management which came into effect two years ago as part of the Government’s Fresh Start for Water package of reforms.

The strengthened limits-based regime requires all regional councils to set limits on water quality and quantity across all

THE BATTLE FOR WATER BEGINSM A R Y S H A N A H A N

Mycorrcin uses BioStart’s signal molecule technology to activate indigenous populations of mycorrhizal fungi.

These beneficial fungi increase the plant’s nutrient and moisture uptake, remedy soil compaction and repair soil aggregate.

AVAILABLE FROM LEADING HORTICULTURAL SUPPLIERSFor further information on BioStart Mycorrcin or any of the BioStart range, phone 0800 116 229 or visit the BioStart website www.biostart.co.nz

Weedspraying?Boost mycorrhizal colonisation by adding

18950 Mycorrcin Grape Ad.indd 1 21/9/05 2:26:43 PM

Page 17: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 17

their catchments. “Hawke’s Bay is one of the ear-

liest to move on this so they are really breaking new ground,” says Harding, who helped prepare the submission to the EPA and is con-cerned that New Zealand Wine-growers is unprepared to support regions on resource management issues.

Plan Change 6 introduces lim-its on groundwater and surface water extraction in the Tukituki catchment, along with new rules governing nutrient management and rules relating to the operation of large scale community water storage schemes like the Ruatani-wha proposal. Both proposals are being considered together by the EPA because they are so intercon-nected.

Released during vintage when winegrowers were busy with har-vest, the plan change includes a proposal to stage a significant increase in low flows at various points along the river.

“That will have a direct impact,” Harding says, “with previously minor irrigation restrictions extending to become potentially ruinous long-running bans.”

Under Plan Change 6, increas-ing the use of nitrogen by 10 per-cent will trigger the need for a resource consent, which could turn into a major constraint on existing viticultural practices such as winter grazing, as well as restricting change in land use.

Harding says phosphate con-trols are also included in the plan change but most of the phosphate in the Tukituki River is generated by stock or human sewage from Central Hawke’s Bay. The issue is relatively straightforward and the regulations impact more on agriculture than viticulture – “it’s about stock control around water-ways and vineyards should have no great issue with compliance”.

The implications for nitrogen are more significant. With more

Hawke’s Bay farmers moving into dairying, there are concerns around the impacts of nitrogen intensification.

T h e E PA’ s i n d e p e n d e n t board will hear submissions in November and its decision on the construction and operation of the dam, along with new river low-flow limits and the rules around nitrogen and phosphate, is expected next year.

Harding, a contract grape grower whose vineyard borders the southern stopbank of the Tukituki River at Haumoana, says he and other lower Tukituki viticulturists, orchardists and horticulturists are pawns in the trade-off for the dam.

Hard-hit by water bans intro-duced over the particularly dry 2012/13 summer, several leading orchardists say the regional coun-cil’s position on river-flow limits could cost their industry millions of dollars a year and hundreds of jobs.

Harding agrees the financial impacts will be hugely significant if the plan change goes ahead unmodified.

Originally the proposed plan covered only surface water takes in the lower Tukituki. In its final published form, it now encom-passes a far bigger net of users by putting the onus on those growers to prove that their groundwater takes won’t influence the flow in the river.

“The proposed plan change sets limits on water extraction over all parts of Tukituki. The regional council is fixated with Central Hawke’s Bay and their dam but, by their own admission, they have forgotten about lower Tukituki growers.

“For me, there’s a huge uncer-tainty. I don’t irrigate with sur-face water, but I don’t know if my ground water use will be linked to low flow. I could face a $10-25,000 bill for a hydrology study to even begin to answer the question.

Hey Growers!

Far

mla

nds

Co

-op

erat

ive

So

ciet

y Li

mite

d

FAR

2196

8

Terms and Conditions available online www.farmlands.co.nz/competitions

During October and November, as a

Shareholder, when you spend $800 or

more at Farmlands on selected Nufarm or

Gro-Chem products, we’ll give you a ½ HAM ON THE

BONE!

Page 18: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

18 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

“When some growers run the numbers through the models they will find themselves out of business. Without reliable water for irrigation, crops will fail. So this is big stuff.”

Harding says the regional council has failed in its statutory responsibility to properly consider the wider effects on the region’s economy.

It estimated the effect on the lower Tukituki irrigators as $2m per annum but the study was flawed, was done before the plan change was extended to cover groundwater and the real impact

would be more than ten times their figure.

“We have strong concerns about the limits. Changing the minimum flows on the Tukituki will have downstream effects for growers. Plan Change 6 is the other half of the whole horrible mess and half the reason the dam’s resource consent applications are being heard by the EPA.”

Harding says he doesn’t want to see low flow changes for the Tukituki catchment without mitigation of the impacts on existing users.

“The whole scheme would

operate to take water off the lower Tukituki guys. They didn’t really think about us and unlike Central Hawke’s Bay, there isn’t even going to be any infrastructure to allow us to get stored water.”

Meanwhile, the regional council says its flow limits are based on rigorous science and are aimed at protecting environmental values. Collaborating with stakeholders through the TANK group (an acronym for the Tutaekuri, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamu catchments), the council is funding an 18-month study investigating the water take

in these areas. H a r d i n g i s o n e o f t w o

winegrower representatives on the TANK group, which aims to establish broad consensus amongst all the different interest g r o u p s a b o u t t h e s e o t h e r catchments which together with the Tukituki cover the Heretaunga Plains – the horticultural and viticultural heart of Hawke’s Bay.

Regional council chairman Fenton Wilson has said there is still a great deal of work to be done before a final decision is made on the dam project. ■[email protected]

Vineyards are established on both sides of the lower Tukituki River. PHOTO RICHARD BRIMER PHOTOGRAPHY

Page 19: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 19

Outstanding In Our Field

Grapevine Propagation Specialists

Office: 03 5776354148 Rowley Crescent, Grovetown, Blenheim 7202

[email protected]

Our field is providing commercially proven clones at a competitive price. Our focus is producing premium grapevines

certified to the NZWG Grafted Grapevine Standard.

Marlborough based but ship nation wide

Priority service for Repeat Customers

Market leaders in ONL ‘Hi-Stem’™ vines

James Vineyard AeratorRemoves soil compaction and lets oxygen into the soil which helps release locked up fertiliser. Aeration also helps with drainage.

The Aerator is also used for root pruning which will produce new

feeder roots and better production.

SOIL AERATION SPECIALISTSMaitland RD5, GorePh/Fax: 03 207 1837Mobile: 027 628 5695

New Zealand’s Leading Wine Broker Providing Total Wine Solutions

www.winenetwork.co.nz

• Supply of bulk wine domestically and internationally

• Supplier for private label wines

• Grapes for sale or wanted

• Buy and sell industry supplies

• Wine industry employment

• Wine real estate for sale or lease

• Providing industry experience and professional service

Contact Michael Selak

Tel: (+64 9) 489 3644 Fax: (+64 9) 489 3646

Email: [email protected]

Grapes WantedRapaura Springs Wines has had another amazing year growing, making, and selling premium quality branded wine.The multi award winning wine that our great team of growers and winemakers delivered along with a huge investment in marketing and promotion has created unprecedented demand. We are now looking for more contract Growers to join the team; we can offer:

❱❱ An attractive price per tonne

❱❱ Long Term contracts

❱❱ Cropping levels per hectare that reflect your individual vineyards ability to produce quality wine

❱❱ An in house grower support program

❱❱ Access to independent viticultural advice

Rapaura Springs and its parent company Spring Creek Vintners are New Zealand owned with significant assets in both wine processing and vineyard production, we are passionate about the New Zealand wine industry – so if you are a new grower or a more experienced one coming off contract give us a call and join the team.

Call our grower liaison Simon Bowers on 021 446 993 or email your contact details to [email protected]

Page 20: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

20 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

VINEYARDNEWS

I n the last issue of NZ Wine-grower Dr David Jordan said the greatest threat to the New Zealand wine

industry in the near future, was the onslaught of wood diseases. That was reiterated at the Bragato Conference, with three particu-lar nasties under the microscope - Eutypa, Botryosphaeria and Cylindrocarpon, (Blackfoot).

All three were referred to as the ‘silent assassins by SARDI scientist Mark Sosnowski. And with good reason. All three begin with an infection that is stealthily deadly. It hits without being seen and it can be years before the tell tale symptoms begin to emerge.

SILENT ASSASSINST E S S A N I C H O L S O N

Page 21: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 21

With Eutypa and Botryospha-eria the spores are transferred by moisture onto vine wounds, such as those made during prun-ing. Sosnowski said the life cycle, while it may take some time to produce visual symptoms, needs to be understood.

“You start with a symptomatic vine, and as the vine wood dies the fungus produces a black fruiting body on the surface of the wood. If you slice through that black sur-face you can see the fruiting bod-ies with the naked eye. Once they are wet they produce microscopic spores which enter the xylem vessels. Once there, the spores germinate and grow through the vessels and through the cell walls. They also produce toxins which travel up to the foliage causing the stunted growth. Then the fungus invades the wood and kills it, as the cycle continues.

Botryosphaeria follows much

the same pattern, with the excep-tion that there are no toxins pro-duced, therefore no early foliar symptoms. Basically, the first sign of the disease you will see is the inevitable die back within the vine.

In both cases if you cut through the trunk of the vine you will notice darkening wedges of wood. It is difficult to tell the difference between Eutypa and Botryospha-eria wood symptoms, without a lab test.

Both diseases tend to strike older vines, with Sauvignon Blanc one of the most prone varieties.

Jade Rogge, Treasury Wine Estate South Island Vineyard Man-ager said Cylindrocarpon is differ-ent to the two others in that it is a soil borne pathogen, that attacks through the roots. It is assumed the pathogens live in a latent state in the soil and under certain conditions can attack weakened plants. The fungus infects its

host through natural openings or wounds on the roots or through the crown of the rootstock. Over time the fungus invades lignified tissues of the plant and eventu-ally plugs up the xylem, preventing the uptake of water and nutrients. Foliar symptoms are those of a vine under stress – late bud burst, restricted growth, berry abortion early in the season, yellow spotting on the leaves and early autumn senescence and leaf fall.

Eventually it will kill the vine. It is a disease that attacks

younger vines, although it is appearing in older vineyards throughout the country.

Management of Eutypa and Botryosphaeria

In both these cases it comes down to preventing the spores from entering open wounds, such as those made during pruning. Choosing when to prune is one

option open to growers, accord-ing to Sosnowksi.

“In the middle of dormancy the wound healing process is much slower so the window of suscep-tibility is much longer. As you go into spring, the natural organisms that cause wound healing are more active and they heal quicker. It has always been thought that it is a better time to prune later towards spring.”

Double pruning has proved to be another option he said.

“If you are pre pruning with a machine early in winter and leaving the follow up until later towards spring, you are reducing your risk of infection. Research in America has shown double prun-ing has reduced infections of both Eutypa and Botryosphaeria.

But you still have to protect your wounds in spring, if there is rain.”

Regardless of when you prune,

www.powerfarming.co.nz

Lee Seatter - Australasian Viticulture Manager — 0061 417 868 413

SPRAYRITE AIRDROP G4 GRAPE SPRAYER•2100Litrecapacity•2Row•Boomsuspension•Spraycontroller•Adjustableaxle

WHOLESALE DIRECT DEAL!

+GST$25,990*ONLY

*PricingValiduntil1stDecember2013

FULL AND CONTINUED SPRAYRITEPARTS SUPPORT & BACKUP

CALL LEE DIRECT &SAVE $$$

Page 22: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

22 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

Typical symptoms for a vine affected by Blackfoot, stunted shoots, poor cane lignification and early senescence.

or how, you need to be protecting those wounds, especially if there is any moisture around. It takes less than 2mm of water to get the spores going.

“After two hours of that initia-tion of the moisture, the spores will start being produced and when that moisture is eliminated, the spores will continue to be pro-duced for 36 hours, so it is quite a serious window of activity.”

Paints and pastes are the cur-rent options. Although be careful if using acrylic paint, that you get it on as soon after pruning as pos-sible. Sosnowksi pointed out that if you leave the vines untreated for a couple of hours, then paint, you might be sealing in spores, rather than keeping them out. That’s where fungicide treatments come into play.

“They will give you a little more opportunity to get the paste on after the pruning. Fungicides can also be applied via sprayers and I believe that is going to be the way

of the future in vineyards.”

Management and Prevention of Cylindrocarpon

Given the pathogens for this wood disease could be lying within the soil, Rogge said you need to be vigilant about nutrition and water holding capacity. It appears that when a vine is under stress due to being water logged or lacking in nutrition, it is ripe for attack by the disease.

She talked about a vineyard planted in Marlborough 2001 that began to show symptoms of Black-foot five years later. But not all the vines in the block were affected, just a number of isolated spots spread throughout.

“The soils had been identified as very low on organic matter and there were extremely high water tables present.”

In terms of management, because it was a limited number of vines showing signs of Black-

foot, the company continued to farm them until they died. Mulch-ing practices were put in place and health practices improved. The end result was no dramatic spread of the disease, although the affected vines created some management headaches.

“It led to difficult pruning deci-sions, there was block variability, challenging canopy management and machine harvesting difficul-ties. And money had been spent on vines that weren’t producing,” Rogge said.

The alternative though was to remove the diseased vines, and leave the ground fallow for three years – something no grower wants to be faced with.

In terms of preventing Black-foot, she said it was important to determine through testing whether pathogens are present in the soil, before planting. If they are there, consider growing crops of mustard seeds and turning it twice a year.

“Even if the pathogens are not present this is something we should be thinking about doing.”

If found within an established vineyard, increase the soil and organic matter with cover crops such as oats and lupins.

“And maintain good general vine health through the applica-tion of foliar nutrients including fertilisers and seaweed products. Do NOT apply excess water during application.”

Given the pathogens can be carried by water, this is an impor-tant point. There is no chemical control for the New Zealand spe-cies of Cylindrocarpons, removing the vine is the only answer.

But most of all be vigilant. Look out for symptoms of vines under stress, get soil tests, improve nutrition, control any chance of water logging. And if all else fails, the only current option is to remove the vine, leaving the space fallow for at least three years. ■[email protected]

Page 23: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013
Page 24: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

24 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

YOUNGWINNER

F ollowing on from one of the best vintages in dec-ades, Gisborne is celebrat-ing another milestone

– with one of their own taking out the title of Moore Stephens Markham’s National Young Viti-culturist of the Year. Twenty-seven year old Matthew Fox is the first Gisborne young vit to win the title in the history of the event. But despite his obvious skills on the land, Fox is not limiting himself to the vineyard. He is also devel-oping his winemaking skills with his first wines due to be released early next year.

As the viticulturist on his fam-

ily’s 100 hectare vineyard, Fox has been around grapes for the past 15 years. That’s not to say he was always going to head down the path of the wine industry. While at school he had his goal set on becoming a motor cross race mechanic.

“We are quite a motor sport orientated family and doing motor cross as a child, I eat, slept and breathed it. But I knew I didn’t have the talent to race profes-sionally. And then like everyone at that age, I wanted to make the most money from doing as little as possible and mechanics have to work pretty damn hard, without

making much money.”It’s a career councillor at his

high school that we have to thank for this young man ending up in the wine industry. Knowing his background, the councillor sug-gested that he take some corre-spondence papers through EIT in Hawke’s Bay, while still at school. The general viticulture and soil science papers sparked an inter-est, and in 2005 he decided to take it further, by moving to the Bay and taking on the course full time.

The course which covers both winemaking and viticulture was everything Fox hoped it would be, and although he is the first to

admit he loves being outdoors, he wasn’t prepared to limit himself to just working among the vines. After completing the course, he took a year off, helped develop some new blocks at home, under-took a vintage in Hawke’s Bay and then decided to travel for more experience.

His first foray overseas saw him in Canada, at a company called Inniskillin in Niagara on the Lakes. He has also undertaken two vintages in France in the Northern Rhone Valley, a place he says was inspirational.

“My plan is to start a wine brand with three styles – Viognier,

NATIONAL YOUNG VITT E S S A N I C H O L S O N

From Left: Matt Duggan - Marlborough, Matt Fox – Gisborne, Paul Robinson – Hawke’s Bay, Dan Manuge – Nelson, Simon Gourley – Central Otago

Mat Fox

Page 25: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 25

Syrah and Chardonnay. The two vintages in France were the inspi-ration for those wines, especially the Syrah and Viognier. To go over there and work in the holy grail of Syrah and the homeland of the grape was pretty special. I worked there two years in a row because with a single vintage you only get a real snapshot of what the place and wines are like. It was cool to go back and see how they had developed over the year and to compare vintage to vin-tage as well.”

This year’s competition was the second time Fox has taken part, his first being in 2010. The time lapse between competitions has honed his knowledge he says, despite the fact that he has spent more time undertaking vintages than he has on the ground in the vineyard.

“I have gained so much practical experience since I left uni, stuff you can’t learn until you are out there working. You have to learn to be creative in the vineyard, that’s what I like about it, as opposed to the winemaking. With viticulture you have to be out there, you have to be looking for things, and you have to come up with creative solutions. I enjoy the challenge of trying to control the vines, rather than letting them control me.”

Looking back on the com-petition itself, held before and during the Romeo Bragato Con-ference in Marlborough, Fox says he was surprised to learn he had won. Especially as he was pretty down after the first day’s intense competition. The five competi-tors had to create an eco trellis, prepare a pruning module, make recommendations on buying an established vineyard, design a pest

and disease programme and set up a sprayer. Then they took part in the fun horti-sports module, prior to a quick question round, an interview and then the prepared speech delivered at the Bragato Wine Awards dinner.

“I was pretty down and out on the first day. I felt a bit better after

the interview, and a little bet-ter still after the question round. When it came to the speech I was really, really n e r v o u s . B u t once that was over, it was pure relief. I couldn’t wait to get my hands on a glass of wine.”

In terms of prizes, Fox takes out $2000 and the trophy, plus another $5000 from NZSVO for travel to any wine producing coun-try in the world. That is going to come in very handy, given he is due to get married early next year.

“It is going to ensure we have a honeymoon,” he said.

Fox says he is “stoked” at being Gisborne’s first ever National Young Viticulturist.

“But I am even more happy to see the positive press it will gener-ate for Gisborne.”

In deprecating style he credits his family and fiancée Kelsey for their encouragement and support, saying he couldn’t have got any-where near the title without them.

Now he has to start preparing for the Young Horticulturist of the Year competition, where he will compete against other young people from land based industries. That will take place in Auckland on November 13 and 14.

Runner-up at this year’s Young Viticulturist, for the second year in a row, was Treasury Estate Wine’s Matt Duggan from Marlborough. ■

[email protected]

Fox says he is “stoked” at being Gisborne’s first ever National Young Viticulturist. “But I am even more happy to see the positive press it will generate for Gisborne.”

PICK THE NEXT BIG THING

www.riversun.co.nz

To complement New Zealand’s largest selection of varieties and clones, Riversun is planning to bring in up to another 30 new imports. If there is something you think should be on this list contact us now…

Page 26: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

26 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

SURVEYRESULTS

F or the first time in four years grape growers in New Zealand’s two largest wine regions are optimistic about the future. Prices have increased, yields

are up and a stunning vintage is the icing on the cake.

The Viticultural Monitoring Report, con-ducted by Fruition Horticulture and funded by NZWinegrowers draws on information from 18 growers in the Marlborough region and 15 in Hawke’s Bay. The information is collated into regional individual ‘model’ vineyards, with the Marlborough model being 30 producing hectares, and Hawke’s Bay being 12.5 hectares.

MarlboroughSauvignon Blanc makes up 77% of the pro-

ducing area, followed by Pinot Noir, Char-donnay, Pinot Gris and Riesling. As for most regions Marlborough’s 2013 vintage was a vast improvement on the previous year. Yields increased 26% when compared with the lower than average yields of 2012, thanks to near per-fect conditions at flowering.

Tonnages per hectare rose from 9.7 tonnes in 2012, to 12.2 tonnes this year, far higher than most growers had predicted. However there was a decided difference between the sub regions, with the Awatere growers showing

far lower yields overall, when compared with their Wairau compatriots.

“In the vineyard model, Sauvignon Blanc yielded 13.1 tonnes per hectare, on average up 21% on the previous year and 9% up on the 2008-12 average,” the report states. “On the monitored vineyard, yields for Sauvignon Blanc ranged from 8.1 tonnes (Awatere) to 19.6 tonnes per hectare. The Wairau growers pro-duced yields of Sauvignon Blanc 41% higher than the Awatere growers.”

Which indicates that if the Awatere hadn’t suffered a cooler flowering period, the total tonnages for Marlborough could have been far higher than the eventual 251,850 tonnes. (The Awatere makes up 29% of Marlborough’s total vineyard area, according to the last figures provided by the Marlborough District Council in 2011.)

Alongside the higher yields, the price being paid for fruit also saw a dramatic increase rising 22% across all varieties, to $1720 per tonne. Sauvignon Blanc prices rose 22% to $1603, while Pinot Noir rose 11% to $3024. Growers had not predicted such an increase, calculating any rise would be around the 6% figure when asked last year. However they are not expect-ing those prices to continue rising next year.

“The improved yields in Marlborough in 2013 have limited growers’ expectations to a minimal price increase across all varie-ties in 2013/14, as supply catches back up to demand.”

With high yields and an increase in grape prices, the net cash income for Marlborough has also risen – by 53% when compared with last year. The net cash income this year was $625,800, or $20,860 per hectare. This has led to a substantial increase in vineyard profit before tax, by 220% over the 2012/13 season, to $9800 per hectare. While moving in the right direction, that profit is still way below the high of 2008, when growers recorded a profit before tax of $14,970.

GROWERS EXPERIENCE BETTER TIMEST E S S A N I C H O L S O N

LIME ROCK, HAWKE’S BAY. PHOTO SUPPLIED NZWINEGROWERS

Page 27: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 27

In terms of costs, nearly every one of the 18 growers involved stated there was no fat left to cut in terms of vineyard expenditure. Repairs and maintenance have been placed on the back burner for a number of years now, as has fertiliser applications. However both these areas are now being spent on, with fertiliser costs rising substantially in the past 12 months.

“However the $200 per hectare for fertiliser is still $229 per hectare less than the 2008/09 season.”

Optimism in the future of the wine industry

has seen a change in attitude to future devel-opment as well. Several growers in the sur-vey indicated they were looking to purchase addition vineyard area in an effort to increase economics of scale, while other growers are looking at further development.

“Development increased from zero in 2011/12 to $17,000 in 2012/13, due to two grow-ers in the survey planting new areas on their properties. More development is planned for the model with a lesser amount in 2014, but higher again in 2015 when plants are ready.

Development plans also tended to be into new land, rather than replanting existing vineyards.”

And growers are not planning to cut back on yields, if their plans for pruning are anything to go by. Those that had moved from two or three canes to four canes last year, to counter the chances of a second year of low yields, say they are sticking with four canes again this year. That is expected to see yields in 2014 rise yet again, if weather conditions are favourable at flowering.

Moving forward the morale and business viability appears to be on the rise.

“A particular factor is that the improve-ment is based on increased grape demand, not just one good growing season. As a result, the majority of growers felt positive or cautiously optimistic about their business.”

Hawke’s BayThere is also cautious optimism within the

growers surveyed in Hawke’s Bay. After three years of negative returns, this season has seen vineyard profit restored.

The favourable weather conditions helped

AvAilAble nAtionwide from:All leAdinG HortiCUltUrAldiStribUtorS

a unique blend of trace elementsTrace-It Total• For rapid nutrient uptake & correction of trace element deficiencies

• Cost effective

• Developed for New Zealand conditions

www.grochem.co.nz

Page 28: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

28 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

produce a vintage that many claim is one of the best ever, although the drought did cause issues in terms of irrigation bans.

“A number of growers faced irrigation bans of up to 28 days during the ripening period, causing some reduction in yield in those affected areas,” the report says. “On other vineyards with high crop volumes, fruit struggled to reach target brix because the vines were water stressed, but flavour profiles were still achieved.”

What a difference to the 2011/12 season, especially in terms of profit.

The Hawke’s Bay model achieved a cash-operating surplus of $86,500 which is a staggering 1230% greater than the $6500 surplus achieved in 2011/12.

“Although this season has seen vineyard profit restored after three years of negative returns, growers remain cautious. They see this season as a reprieve and hope for another ‘normal’ season to aid in the financial recovery.”

Merlot is the dominant variety within the Hawke’s Bay model, making up 24% of the producing area, followed by Sauvignon Blanc, Chardonnay, Pinot Gris, Syrah and other reds. Over all varieties, yields increased by 20%, with an average of 8.2 tonnes per hectare this last season, compared with 6.8 tonnes in the previous year.

Syrah yields increased 104% to 10.2 tonnes with Merlot up 37.5% to 9.9 tonnes and Pinot Gris up 73% to 10.4 tonnes. Sauvignon Blanc yields remained stable at 7.2 tonnes per hectare, although there is potential for this to increase once the vines gain some age.

In terms of prices, all varieties saw increases, with a weighted average price of $1680, up $505 on last season. That is the highest level

paid for fruit since the 2008/09 season. It was Chardonnay that had the greatest increase, reflecting the growing demand for this variety and the outstanding quality of the fruit. The average price was $1890 per tonne, 29% more than last year.

Merlot prices rose to $1770 a tonne, up $495 on last year. The average price for Syrah rose by $180 per tonne, although some vineyards did not reach target brix due to high crop loads coupled with water restrictions.

Growers did well to drop expenses by 8% this last season, spending an average of $6856 per hectare. The perfect weather conditions certainly helped, decreasing the disease pressure, need for sprays, mowing, weed and pest control. However electricity costs rose, due to the increased need for irrigation. Frost protection costs also rose by 200% with up to 13 frost events reported in the 2012/13 season.

Overall the report states that this season has been a bright contrast to the difficult 2012/13 season, which for many growers was their worst ever.

“Although this has been the most positive vintage in four years, growers remain cautious. They realise they need more than one season to bring their businesses back to sustainable viability.”

If there is one major concern, it remains the profitability of the industry moving for-ward.

“Growers are still facing challenges with price-setting occurring too late in the s e a s o n a n d c a s h f l o w i s s u e s from being drip fed grape payments t h r o u g h o u t t h e y e a r. G r o w e r s f e e l current contract payment schedules have growers ‘banking’ the wineries with drip fed payments impairing cash flow.

“They also think that the costs of growing grapes have outweighed the price received for too many years and that wineries seem to expect growers to increase inputs to achieve higher quality parameters without a commensurate increase in grape prices.” ■[email protected]

226 Stanley Road, Gisborne.Ph 06-869 0153 : Fax 06-868 8127www.unieng.co.nz

PRODUCTS:

Universal Engineering provide engineering fabrication services in both stainless steel and carbon steel to the wine industry

›› Stainless steel and carbon steel walkways and staircases›› Whole bunch tin tippers›› Marc conveyors›› Stainless steel augers›› Chutes›› Hoppers›› Sheet metal and stainless fabrication

No false hang-ups!4 Specialised & exclusive products 4 Technical capabilities that go beyond the wire

• Viticultureandhorticultureisourbusiness• Onsiteadvicewhenandwhereyouneedit• Experiencedtechnicalsupportteam

looking for something tohang your hat on . . .

Ecocarb®Organic FungicideEcocarb is registered for the control of powdery mildew in grapes. Ecocarb is a fast acting specially formulated contact fungicide containing Activated Potassium Bicarbonate which works by changing the pH on the leaf creating a more alkaline environment, which is unfavourable for fungi spores. Ecocarb will damage cell walls of fungi, resulting in dehydration and death of fungal organisms. Key benefits and features:• Afast-actingcontactfungicide.• Nowithholdingperiod.• Nore-entryrestrictions.• BioGrocertifiedonapermittedbasis.• Convenientpacksizes:5kgpail,10kg+20kgbuckets,20kgbag.

Ecocarb®isregisteredpursuanttotheAVCMAct1997NoP7072.

Wuxal® AminoOrganic BiostimulantWuxal Amino is an organic liquid biostimulant for quick revitalisation of plants suffering from stress.WuxalAminocontains9%organicallyfixednitrogen,aminoacids(648g/l)andpolypeptides.Amino Acids are building blocks for proteinsandenzymes.Somefreeaminoacidsimprovewater-stresstoleranceofplants. Amino acids have been shown tostimulatebiochemicalandenzymaticprocesses in the plant. They are also excellent chelating agents for somemicronutrients.Key benefits and features:• Enhancescropquality,fruit-set,size

and colour.• Effectiveforstress-reliefand

strengthening of plants.• Activatingpoweronpesticidesand

micronutrients.• Canbefoliarappliedorfertigated.• BioGrocertifiedonapermittedbasis.• Convenientpacksizes:20L&200L.

4431

Both Products are BioGro certified ona permitted basis.

Page 29: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

No false hang-ups!4 Specialised & exclusive products 4 Technical capabilities that go beyond the wire

• Viticultureandhorticultureisourbusiness• Onsiteadvicewhenandwhereyouneedit• Experiencedtechnicalsupportteam

looking for something tohang your hat on . . .

Ecocarb®Organic FungicideEcocarb is registered for the control of powdery mildew in grapes. Ecocarb is a fast acting specially formulated contact fungicide containing Activated Potassium Bicarbonate which works by changing the pH on the leaf creating a more alkaline environment, which is unfavourable for fungi spores. Ecocarb will damage cell walls of fungi, resulting in dehydration and death of fungal organisms. Key benefits and features:• Afast-actingcontactfungicide.• Nowithholdingperiod.• Nore-entryrestrictions.• BioGrocertifiedonapermittedbasis.• Convenientpacksizes:5kgpail,10kg+20kgbuckets,20kgbag.

Ecocarb®isregisteredpursuanttotheAVCMAct1997NoP7072.

Wuxal® AminoOrganic BiostimulantWuxal Amino is an organic liquid biostimulant for quick revitalisation of plants suffering from stress.WuxalAminocontains9%organicallyfixednitrogen,aminoacids(648g/l)andpolypeptides.Amino Acids are building blocks for proteinsandenzymes.Somefreeaminoacidsimprovewater-stresstoleranceofplants. Amino acids have been shown tostimulatebiochemicalandenzymaticprocesses in the plant. They are also excellent chelating agents for somemicronutrients.Key benefits and features:• Enhancescropquality,fruit-set,size

and colour.• Effectiveforstress-reliefand

strengthening of plants.• Activatingpoweronpesticidesand

micronutrients.• Canbefoliarappliedorfertigated.• BioGrocertifiedonapermittedbasis.• Convenientpacksizes:20L&200L.

4431

Both Products are BioGro certified ona permitted basis.

Page 30: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

30 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

INDUSTRYPROFILE

T ens of thousands of bot-tles of wine have passed through the hands of Shona White in the past

25 years. All in the name of help-ing ascertain which are the most deserving of a medal or trophy. That’s because Shona is literally the Queen of New Zealand wine shows.

The new director of the Royal Easter Show, convenor of the Air New Zealand Wine Awards, and facilitator or director of five other annual shows, she has been at the coal face longer than most of the winemakers entering.

It all began back in 1988, when as part of a wine course she was

undertaking, she took on the role of steward at the Royal Easter Show. A rather innocuous begin-ning, that led to her helping the then director Terry Dunleavy and Allan Manson instigate a double blind computerised judging sys-tem.

It is still being used today, and ensures that no wine judge can accidentally uncover the name of the wine they are tasting.

Most of her work is very much behind the scenes – and certainly not to be confused with the somewhat glamorous role of the judges, who get to swirl, taste and spit their way through hundreds of wines every show. But without

someone like White, these shows would never get off the ground.

The shows of today are a far cry from those early ones in the 80s. Take her first role as steward – there were only 360 wines entered. This year at the Royal Easter Show there were 1137. The most wines she has dealt with has been 1750 – at the 2006 Air New Zealand Wine Awards.

That involved 16 pallets and took well over a day to set up.

At most competitions three samples of every wine entered have to be sent to the organisers. Wineries are provided with sets of labels that have to be attached to the bottles, prior to sending. But

when something goes wrong – it can be a nightmare for organis-ers. In the 2006 Air New Zealand Awards, one winery had incor-rectly managed their dispatch and the samples were never received.

“I calculated at the time there were 7500 bottles, 550 cartons I had to go through to make sure I had received their wine.”

The other major change that has actually made life easier for the competition organisers, is the advent of screw caps. It has made opening much easier for one thing, but it has also cut down the high percentage of faulty wines – a major bonus.

“When I first did the Easter

QUEEN OF WINE SHOWST E S S A N I C H O L S O N

SPRAY THE PRECISION WAY.FMR is a family-owned importer, manufacturer and distributor of vineyard management equipment.

Our SP2300RT is the superior spraying solution

• Saveonchemicalwaste

• Reducesprayexpenditureby30%plus

• Eliminatedrift

• Quietandeasytooperate

• SupportedandservicedbynetworkofdealersthroughoutNewZealand

AUSTRALIA: 1800 269 773 OR VISIT WWW.FMRGROUP.NET.AU

NEW ZEALAND: 0800 367 583 OR VISIT WWW.FMRGROUP.CO.NZ

Page 31: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 31

show in 1988 we would be asked to open a new bottle in 35 to 40 percent of all wine entered, over the course of the competition. Sometimes on a flight we would be asked for a new bottle on four of the wines, and the flight would only be 15.”

Wine shows may seem de rigour these days, given the vast number of them. But White says each has its place in the structure of the industry and is vitally important especially to smaller companies.

“My biggest delight is seeing a small wine company do well. With me personally being a small busi-

ness owner, (she runs a motel) I understand how important that is to their business. And never underestimate the importance of a sticker (medal winning wine etc) on a bottle for wine companies, or how it helps consumers.”

Originally back in the early days White did classes run by Bob Campbell for people wishing to perhaps become a judge – and while she did “okay” she never took it any further.

There are at least seven wine show organisers in New Zealand who are more than grateful she made that decision! ■[email protected]

Shona White – Queen of wine shows.

Phone (09) 3729155 Email : [email protected] Web: www.rd2.co.nz

Available through all good Ag retail stores

Page 32: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

32 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

How long have you worked in Waipara? 10 years this December

What brought you to Waipara? It’s my home region! Born and bred in Christchurch, so it is nice and close to home and family. Also being a Crusaders supporter was a major drawcard.

Where have you travelled in wine to get here? Studied at Lincoln, before working in the vineyards in Gibbston Valley for a year. Then took a job at Greystone on the vine-yard. As the company grew I was able to work more and more with the wine, and haven’t looked back since! I was able to travel to the Barossa valley in ’08 and work a vintage there just before Greystone began harvesting.

What do you enjoy most about your job? The variety of work I get ‘on the shop floor’ so to speak – creating a wine from scratch through all stages of production really floats my boat. It’s really awesome to see a bottle of wine roll off the packaging line and think “I made that!” I guess the measure of suc-cess I have is how many times I can help get our winemaker up to the podium to receive awards!

What do you enjoy most about Waipara? The landscape is really something. I’ve trudged up and down the hills enough to appreciate them fully! The crew we work with are amazing people, and so are the locals. Good people = good wine!

When you’re not making wine or growing grapes? Pretty much 98% of my time away from the winery is spent raising my three

kids Cole, Ella and Cooper with my darling wife Jess. We also have another on the way so life is going to be rather busy for a few years! When I do get some time off, I can be found at the Aikido dojo; training for my next grading as a black belt. I also enjoy a spot of running and fishing and other blokey stuff like that.

It sucks when….? at 4am you open the doors of the press to find your 7 tonne of Pinot Gris needs another few cycles to get the right extraction rate-so you put the twentieth pot of coffee on!

Your favourite wine? We are lucky in the fact that at the end of vintage we have what we call the ‘Burgundy dinner’, where we can sit down and try some of the wines from the region of the same name. My favourite last time was a white Burgundy from Domaine Roulot, Mersault 2008. Delicious! I wouldn’t mind at all if I had a few cases of that squirreled away… I’m also a bit partial to the Greystone Brother’s Reserve Pinot, but maybe that’s just my cellar palette talking…yeah nah.

Which wine region excites you most right now?

That’s a tough question.

I think that Waipara has a lot of untapped potential as yet, with new land to be explored and the refining of wine styles within its sub-regions. It will be really interesting to see where the wind blows us.

Future aspirations? I’ve been dabbling with making a bit of wine here and there so I would love to set up my own label someday. I think Tait Estate has a nice ring to it, don’t you? ■

REGIONSWAIPARA

YOUNG GUNSWAIPARAWaipara is the fastest growing wine region in New Zealand with around 80 vineyards in the valley covering more than 1,200 hectares of plantings. With that growth comes many younger members of the wine industry, keen to make their mark. We meet a few of those Young Guns.

Brought to you by

G AV I N TA I TA G E : 3 1 Y E A R S YO U N GT I T L E : A S S I S TA N T W I N E M A K E R ; G R E Y S T O N E A N D M U D DY WAT E R W I N E S

Page 33: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 33

How long have you worked in Waipara?

I worked at Mudhouse for four years before travelling. I rejoined the company a year ago.

What brought you to Waipara?

North Canterbury is home to me.

Where have you travelled in wine to get here?

I started my career in Waipara and have chosen to progress here.

What do you enjoy most about your job?

Meeting people from all walks of life, from all around the world. I like working outdoors and meeting the challenges that come with it. Harvest is a great reward for all the hard work that you put in throughout the seasons.

What do you enjoy most about Waipara?

That whatever direction you travel in you’re never more than a few kms from the beach, the river and family.

When you’re not making wine or growing grapes?

I’m spending time with my 10 month old son or fishing at the beach.

It sucks when….?

I have to buy fish for tea.

Your favourite wine?

Definitely Waipara Pinot or anything in a brown bottle.

Which wine region excites you most

right now?

Waipara.

Future aspirations?

I see myself in management somewhere down the line and I have an interest in organics. ■

J O N O G I L L E S P I EA G E : 3 2T I T L E : M A C H I N E O P E R AT O R / S U P E R V I S O R M U D H O U S E

wine people are our business

Get W d ~ is hereIRE

Page 34: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

34 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

W E S T L E Y H E E R E NA G E : 2 7T I T L E : V I N E YA R D P E R M A N E N T, P E G A S U S B AY

WESTLEY

How long have you worked in Waipara? Begun working in Waipara part-time while studying at Lincoln University in 2008. So this is my 5th year in the region.

What brought you to Waipara? Well ini-tially the proximity to Christchurch brought me here. I have stayed for Waipara’s unique limestone soils.

Where have you travelled in wine to get here? First vineyard job was working at Fancrest Estate a Certified Organic producer focusing solely on Pinot Noir. Working there really sparked my interest in organics and soil characteristics, adding a depth to the wine industry I never really got while study-ing. Following Fancrest it was off to Germany to work at Weingut Keller. That was a truly transformative experience in my view of wine. Being a super premium producer my 6 months at Keller, working an entire growing season in the vineyards really expanded my knowledge of soils and canopy management techniques.

Now back in Waipara I have moved about working back at Fancrest Estate, The Crater Rim and now at Pegasus Bay.

What do you enjoy most about your job? Working outside with an excellent crew.

What do you enjoy most about Waipara? The micro-climate. I’m always amazed at the difference between Waipara and

Christchurch. It’s common to leave Waipara and head to town in shorts to find the biting easterly sea breezes.

When you’re not making wine or grow-ing grapes? Practicing permaculture, at our home we have a 1/4 acre food forest with 70 different fruit trees and a productive under-story. Also, really into home brewing.

It sucks when….? You open a really good bottle of wine and it’s corked!!

Your favourite wine? Dry Riesling

MICHELLE

How long have you worked in Waipara? 4 years

What brought you to Waipara? I was studying at Lincoln University and got a job pruning in Waipara on the weekends.

Where have you travelled in wine to get here? I am from Denver, CO so I travelled to New Zealand to do the postgraduate Diploma in Viticulture and Oenology at Lincoln. I also worked in Germany for 6 months as an apprentice in the Rheinhessen at Weingut Seehof. While in Europe I also visited Bordeaux to experience their wine culture.

What do you enjoy most about your job? I enjoy working outdoors in the fresh air. At Pegasus Bay we have a really close team of awesome individuals that keep work fun. I love working with the vines, pruning is one of my favourite jobs along with harvest.

What do you enjoy most about Waipara? Waipara has a unique microclimate with amazing soils. The wines produced here are epic. It is a more intimate wine region because of its smaller size. Overall amazing vineyards, winemakers, and friendly country people.

When you’re not making wine or growing grapes? I am out in the garden or tending to our goat, chickens, sheep and pigs. I am from a big city and have embraced the 1/4 acre lifestyle block where my husband and I live. I play football with the Amberley team and just joined a local book club. I also enjoy brewing beer, hiking, camping, music festi-vals and crafts.

It sucks when….? When sawing off an old head on a vine your saw slips and your index finger gets cut. Ouch!! Six stitches later I am fine.

Your favourite wine? I will have to say Ries-ling for being so versatile and exciting.

Which wine region excites you most right now? Mendoza, we are planning on visiting South America.

Future aspirations? Starting a home brewery/winery in our woodshed. I am from the land of microbrews and love beer as well as wine. Continuing to develop my palate and knowledge of vine growing. Be as self sufficient off our land as possible with the orchard and veggie garden. ■

M I C H E L L E H A N S E NA G E : 2 8T I T L E : P E R M A N E N T V I N E YA R D S TA F F AT P E G A S U S B AY W I N E R Y

Page 35: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 35

How long have you worked in Waipara? 10 years

What brought you to Waipara? I was born and bred right here in Canterbury.

Where have you travelled in wine to get here? I haven’t travelled in wine really, just working around the Canterbury region. I have travelled more so to satisfy my need to ride waves and see the developing world.

What do you enjoy most about your job? I love growing plants and the environment I work in is fantastic. Watching the seasons change and working with the vines by hand is very satisfying. It has been a pleasure to take our vineyard to the point where it will be certified organic for the 2014 harvest. We are a small family producer, so in addition to car-ing for the vineyard I enjoy a wide variety of tasks such as helping my mum Jill (Terrace Edge Matriarch) with the tasting room and general marketing.

What do you enjoy most about Waipara? I like the fact that Waipara has a lot of passion-ate people really looking after their land and making great wines.

When you’re not making wine or growing grapes? My wife Alanna and I really enjoy hanging out with our neighbours where we live in Addington, Christchurch. It’s a close knit community of really cool people. You might find us at the Addington Coffee co-op sipping on some quality Fair Trade coffee.

It sucks when….? You get big flights of hun-gry bronze (grass grub) beetles hitting your prized Pinot Noir vines in spring.

Your favourite wine? Clonakilla Shiraz Viongnier.

Which wine region excites you most right now? The Waipara Valley does it for me - a small geographic area with many different soil types growing really good Pinot Noir, Riesling and even Northern Rhone like Syrah.

Future aspirations? I just want to keep get-ting better at what I do. I find the vineyard fascinating – watching, observing what the vines are doing through the changes of the season . Nothing can replace time in the vineyard; continually learning what works and what doesn’t. I find it very satisfying producing a pristine crop of grapes which follows on to make good wine - the season’s work captured in liquid form to enjoy and watch evolve. ■

P E T E C H A P M A NA G E 3 1T I T L E : V I T I C U LT U R I S T, T E R R A C E E D G E V I N E YA R D

BEST QUALITY BIRDNETTING

Full range of sizes for single or multiple row covering30gsm diamond & 39gsm hexagonal mesh constructions

Custom length nets to suit rows

Contact Tony or Calvin0800 NZNETS (0800 696 387)

[email protected] | www.netmaster.co.nz

NetMaster Crop Protection nettings and fabrics

Page 36: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

36 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

WINEMAKINGNEWS

W hile Chardonnay is the number one white wine variety in the world, in New Zealand

it falls well behind Sauvignon Blanc. Which according to a lead-ing expert on the variety, is good news, because it means this coun-try can concentrate on producing high-end wines that represent the individual terroir of each growing region.

Brian Croser, is somewhat of a legend in Australia, establish-ing Petaluma back in the mid 70s, going on to pioneer the develop-ment of the Adelaide Hills region and now winemaker for Tap-anappa. His credentials when it comes to Chardonnay are impec-cable, and earlier this year he was one of the guest speakers at the NZSVO conference in Blenheim, that focused on this beloved white variety.

Since the 1990s Chardonnay styles have changed. While as a variety it is still enjoyed by a con-siderable number of consumers, there was a backlash, with the ABC mantra – Anything But Chardon-nay – taking its toll. Croser feels strongly that turning Chardon-nay into a branded commodity impacted on its status as a fine wine.

“A branded commodity is tradeable between producers as bulk wine, made anywhere, blended to a style and quality standard. Usually just adequate quality standard, but also blended primarily to a cost. It has high brand visibility, distributed eve-rywhere through all the grocery

chains in the world. That bland undistinguished, wood chipped wine with texture has defined Chardonnay for consumers,”

Croser says they grew tired of the style and began looking else-where. The end result was they went for something at the oppo-site end of the spectrum, an aro-matic, fresher, crisper style. Hence the exponential rise of Sauvignon Blanc.

But Chardonnay is making a comeback. Already it is the num-ber one white variety in America, and in terms of fine wine styles, it is surging ahead in Australia and the UK. It is this end of the market New Zealand should be concen-trating on, Croser says.

Seventeen percent of Austral-ian wine produced is Chardonnay, with tonnages at 16 per hectare. In California it has the same percent-age of volume, with tonnages aver-aging at 19 per hectare. Whereas in New Zealand Chardonnay represents just 5 percent of total production and tonnages are a low 7 per hectare.

“To me that says New Zealand is a niche Chardonnay player. You can’t be in the branded commodity market. Fighting the economies of California and Australia is too hard to do.”

The problem here though he believes, is that too many people have planted the variety in the sites where other varieties like Sauvignon Blanc have excelled. By doing that, the true characteristics of Chardonnay have not been able to flourish.

“You cannot grow Chardon-

nay in the same vineyards where Sauvignon Blanc, Cabernet or Merlot excels. These deep allu-vial gravels with shallow top soils just don’t work for Chardonnay. It needs clay, free draining soil with plenty of water and nutrient holding capacity. Basically it needs hillsides.”

Croser says Chardonnay is not Pinot Noir’s daughter for nothing. Much of what is important to pro-duce quality Pinot, is important when it comes to producing qual-ity Chardonnay.

Hillsides, free draining soils, hand picking and careful hands during the winemaking process will help to ensure the strong vari-

etal characters survive through to the bottle.

“Chemically it has its own set of aromatic and flavour com-pounds, which you need the right terroir to bring out. Then the win-emaker can play around with that base and add things to it.”

During the conference he says there was a lot of discussion about the “burnt match” addi-tions to Chardonnay. How much is acceptable?

“The consensus at the end of the day was that there is far too much of it. Consumers, even fine wine consumers, don’t necessarily understand that character or like it. And it doesn’t come from the

CHARDONNAY DRIVEN BY SITET E S S A N I C H O L S O N

Page 37: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 37

grape. It’s something you can add on or stick in. Anyone can do that.”

Less is better was the feeling when it came to oak, and bigger vessels also were the favoured option. When it came to yeast, accidental yeast, (a term Croser prefers to the more common Wild) had empathy with the winemakers present, so long as it doesn’t produce dominant sulphidic characters or produce too many aberrations like ethyl acetate or banana flavours.

Malolactic fermentation is more an individual choice he said, with more of the winemak-ers attending in favour of it than those against.

“People weren’t interested in the Victorian approach which is to completely prohibit malolactic in favour of keeping the freshness. I think here there is a very sensible approach to MFL being able to be managed to produce texture and

complexity without detriment.”If there was one area Croser

felt needed more understanding in New Zealand, it was how to manage phenols.

“There are the flavonoids from the seeds, skins and stalks, which you can avoid. Then there are the non-flavonoid phenols which are in the juice and the pulp which you can’t avoid. In my observa-tion, in New Zealand there are too many flavonoids in the wine and probably a lot of that relates to

where they are growing the grapes. “Which is why if you are planning on producing a high end Chardon-nay, you need to be hand picking to reduce the potential of flavo-noids.”

While the variety may be grown the world over, New Zealand has a number of advantages if it wants to take on that niche high-end mar-ket. Firstly Croser says the climate here is ideal, in all the major Char-donnay growing regions. There are sites that are perfect for the variety

– they just aren’t on the alluvial plains.

“I think the winemakers here are all over the issue. But the one thing that is hard to change is where you are growing it. You have changed the mind-set with Pinot Noir and the same revolution has to happen with Chardonnay. It’s not about trying to get bet-ter Chardonnay out of existing vineyards. It about getting better vineyards.”■[email protected]

EMBRACE SUSTAINABILITY WITH PROVEN CHEMICAL-FREE PROTECTION

BOTRY-Zen® is a biological control agent developed specically for the control of botrytis cinerea.

BOTRY-Zen® is a Bio-Gro certifed input for organic production. ( Bio Gro No. 4405)

MIDI-Zen® - New Generation, New Product!

New Zealand owned and developed natural product.

Mid-season botrytis cinerea and powdery mildew protection.

Pure, simple and proven natural control of Botrytis with BOTRY-Zen® for full season protection. (5 days withholding)

Complement with ARMOUR -Zen® for late season protection. (Nil withholding)

The Proven Biological Solution for Botrytis

www.botryzen.co.nzBOTRY-Zen® is registered in New Zealand pursuant to the ACVM Act 1997 No P7212

Contact Brett Bensemann on 021 2468 944

or email [email protected] L im i ted

Cre

8iv

e 6136

Page 38: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

38 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

VINEYARDNEWS

DECIMATING GRUBST E S S A N I C H O L S O N

T he time is approaching for millions of grass grubs to emerge from under-ground in search of food.

And in most wine regions of New Zealand, that food means new growth on vines.

Grass grubs, a member of the scarab beetle family, can go unno-ticed, if you aren’t out and about after sunset.

That’s because they only fly for 20 to 25 minutes each night, 20 minutes after sunset, and only for a few weeks a year. That period is generally during October and November.

But don’t be fooled that it is only the above ground issues you have to prepare for. Underground the grubs can create just as much carnage as they can on new foliage.

Understanding the lifecycle of the grass grub is vitally impor-tant, according to Dr Trevor Jack-son who works for AgReserch in Christchurch.

“It has four life stages, and

This is what the larvae look like beneath the soil.

For product purchases and information phone: 03-374 6323. Visit: www.emnz.co.nz. Email: [email protected]

Using EM in your vineyard will –• Improve soil structure throughout the profile• Increase soil porosity and water holding capacity• Increase fertiliser response and utilisation of inputs• Increase soil fertility

• Stimulate the biology in your soil and increase natural processes

• Reduce soil borne diseases• Improve yield and quality of crops

EM is a fantastic multi use product that will also –• Improve the composting process for a higher quality

finished product• Add to your waste water sumps to reduce odour and

improve the quality of the waste water for irrigation

EM is a low cost bio-stimulant – to treat 1ha can be as low as $10

Microbes for • Healthy soil • Production • Improved soil

Page 39: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 39

the two well known are the adult brown beetle which lays eggs, which develop into larvae which live in the soil.”

Small as the larvae may be, they still cause substantial dam-age, as they live off the roots of plants – in the vineyard’s case the

vine’s roots. Newly planted vines are most susceptible, given their roots are much closer to the sur-face, where the larvae live.

This is no minor threat. In New Zealand it is estimated that more than a million hectares of pasture is affected by grass grub.

Dealing with larvae Viticulture consultant Domi-

nic Pecchenino says when he arrived in New Zealand in 1993, the only grass grub problems vineyard owners were experiencing were below ground. Cultural practices at the time managed to prevent the adult beetle from becoming too prolific.

“Almost all the vineyards were cultivated and rolled with a big 5 tonne roller pulled behind. So most of the grass grub problem was taken care of at that time by that method.

“Then we started planting the middles to grass species, which is a very good host to grass grub” Essentially what that meant was the larvae were able to survive through to adulthood and the brown beetle emerged in the late spring months.

“In one night they can do some pretty severe damage. You might still have clusters, but you have a lot of damage to the leaf area. In some varieties, like Chardonnay,

grass grub will take the clusters out and damage the growing tip. Which means you have lost crop and economic returns.”

He recommends going back to the old practices of cultivating between rows during those early spring months. Not only does this

help provide passive frost protec-tion, it also churns up the soil, bringing the larvae to the surface.

“Then the birds help to take care of the problem.”

The time to undertake that cul-tivation is now, before the adult beetle emerges.

Dealing with the beetlePecchenino recommends

intensive monitoring through October and November to stay on top of the adult beetle issue.

From October on, he places water traps throughout the vine-yard. While this only captures the male beetles, (the females stay on the ground waiting to mate and lay eggs, before they start flying looking for food) it does give an indication of population levels. He also undertakes visual monitoring each night.

Once numbers start to rise, he knows it’s time to take some form of action. In his case that is aerial spraying where he can, otherwise spot treatment.

The problem is that while you can control the larvae numbers within the vineyard through cul-tivation, it’s not solving the issue of neighbouring properties where the grass grubs can be present.

Organic consultant Bart Arnst said the outside rows appear to be the most at risk, particularly those

“In one night they can do some pretty severe damage. You might still have clusters, but you have a lot of damage to the leaf area.

Plus Sulphur, equals:

Enhanced Powdery Mildew and Erinose Mite control

Microscopic surface photo of Protectorhml

fungal spores are dyed blue

Sticker/Spreaders are not that simple! Enhanced Spreading is part of the story

Surface Characteristics also count.

Protectorhml is pure potassium soap, an anionic surfactantit does not act like oils (vegetable, fish or mineral).

Protectorhml at 0.5% contracts and accumulates spores together, giving them an enhanced punch of whatever happens to be with it – sulphur, copper, biologicals etc.

Good spreaderPulls spores together BANG!Refer to www.henrymanufacturing.co.nz for further information

(Powerpoint file), as well as the new fungicide product HML32

Page 40: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

40 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

facing neighbouring paddocks or headlands. Shelterbelts between these areas often dissipate the flight path of the beetle.

“I have found vineyards where shelter has been removed is where we tend to get smacked on those outside edges.”

Another form of preventative treatment he has found works well, is to encourage vine vigour.

“We saw this last year in a large vineyard operation. Of two blocks in the middle, one was larger in growth than the other, when we had the beetle flights. There was more damage on the lower vigour vines.”

Sacrificial canes also are a bonus. Often left on the vines to help suck the vigour out, these have been found to be most attrac-tive to the beetles.

“They tend to gravitate to those higher points, so we use those quite often.”

Placing old bird netting on the outside vines is another form of prevention shown to be work-ing. But reiterating Pecchenino’s

comments, Arnst said cultivation is the key.

“We need to control them first up in the ground at the egg larvae

stage. If you get those numbers under control, you are half way there.” ■[email protected]

Imagine the foliar damage if this many beetles descended on your vines.

PyGanic® Organic InsecticideNow registered for Grass Grub Beetle control in grapes

PyGanic® is registered pursuant to the ACVM Act 1997. P007039

Key Industries 3/44L Constellation Drive PO Box 65-070,

Mairangi Bay, Auckland 0754

Tel 09 917 1791 Fax 09 917 1793 Email [email protected]

Web www.keyindustries.co.nz Bio-Gro Certified Input

PyGanic® from Key Industries has been used extensively as an insecticide in organic horticultural production for a number of years and this year for the first time it is a registered Agrichemical for Grass Grub beetle control in vineyards.

Trials conducted over the past two seasons has shown that when used at dusk PyGanic® has the ability to kill large numbers of beetles flying into vineyards from surrounding pasture.

PyGanic® has a one day withholding period and does not provide any residual activity therefore for optimum results; it is recommended that timing of application is best when beetles are already feeding or when they are in flight.

Use a minimum of 1L per ha in a water rate of not less than 300L/ha.

Available in 1L and 3.78L containers.

Page 41: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013
Page 42: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

42 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

REGIONSMARLBOROUGH

ARE WE UNDERSELLING OUR PINOTS?T E S S A N I C H O L S O N

F or the 13th year in a row, Cloudy Bay shone the spotlight on Pinot Noir from New Zealand and

around the world. Pinot at Cloudy Bay has become an iconic annual event, which sees guests travelling from around the world as well as the country.

Eighteen wines were placed under the microscope, five of those from New Zealand, the rest from a kaleidoscope of countries, including Argentina, Canada, France, America and Australia. All were from the 2010 vintage.

What was apparent when the wines were revealed after the tasting, was the huge gap in prices being paid for each. The most expensive tasted on the day, (if you could actually get it) was Domaine Drouhin-Laroze Clos De Vougeot 2010 at NZ$200.

Compare that to the five New Zealand wines that ranged in price from $38 to $75. The three Aus-tralian examples averaged $75, while the Argentinian, American and Canadian examples were all around the $100.

Not surprisingly, questions Des Harris adds some finishing touches to one of the courses of the long-lunch.

Page 43: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 43

were raised about the price of New Zealand Pinot Noir. Are we under-selling ourselves? Does it take a large price tag for a wine to be con-sidered ‘great’? Or do we promote that oft overused phrase, that we produce good value for money?

As one attendee pointed out, is that really how we want to be known – good value for money? Does that phrase tell the story we want to convey? Maybe it’s time we took a different approach. Or maybe we just look at raising our price point to reflect the undeni-able quality.

Wine judge, sommelier and writer Sophie Otton from Aus-tralia, who was a guest selector at this year’s event, warned that may be easy to say, but not so easy to achieve.

“It is a case by case scenario, and a vintage by vintage as well. You can’t just suddenly push your prices up. It has to be a strategy from the start I think. Once you set your prices, you have to have a way forward, but you can’t be random about it.”

In terms of the New Zealand wines in the line-up, Otton, who is also a judge at this year’s Air New Zealand Wine Awards, said they were very consistent.

“That was the word on the floor as well. They have good balance and good intensity. If you haven’t got balance, you haven’t got the variety.”

Keeping the refinement in our Pinots was an important step into the future, she said. People already liked the richness in our wines and the flavour. “And it’s only going to get better. You should celebrate that.”

While Pinot Noir may have been the focus of the daylong event, food also played a major role. Des Harris from Clooney’s Restaurant and a finalist in the Chef of the Year Competition, prepared a five course long lunch, served to the guests in Cloudy Bay’s barrel room. From wild game to lobster with puffed crack-ling, plus lamb and fermented gar-lic, the courses were matched to wines.

But at the end of the day there was more than just food for the sating, there was food for thought for many of the wine industry personnel who attended. Where to from here, and just how do we ensure our the quality of our Pinots is reflected in the balance sheet? ■[email protected]

A stunning line-up of Pinots from New Zealand and around the world.

Technologyfor efficient irrigation

management

Metzerplas drip irrigationIndustry-leading drip technology for superior clogging resistance

Arkal disc filtration systemsReliable, effective self-cleaning SpinKlin® disc technology for clean water

Galcon Smart IrrigationSecure online irrigation management with an Outlook style web-based interface.

To find your local dealer contact Water Supply Products:Auckland: 09-916 0094 Christchurch: 03-348 [email protected]

Amiad screen filtration systemsFast, efficient self-cleaning screen technology for the continuous flow of filtered water

Page 44: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

44 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

SOMMELIER’S CORNER CAMERON DOUGLAS MS

I t seems to have been the largest such tasting in New Zealand to date, with local and international examples

on show. The aim was to gain a greater understanding of what ‘Natural’ wine looks, smells and tastes like, and to discuss the topic in depth, speculating on what its future might be in New Zealand for the On and Off-Premise sectors.

After an initial tasting the discussion turned to the appropriateness of ‘Natural’ as a title for wines in this genre, with thoughts on alternative titles.

Dialogue then moved to some of the wines presented – which ranged from undrinkable to very drinkable - this issue seems to be one of the key challenges for winemakers in the genre - results can be hit or miss. There is also the important question of on whose/what scale of

quality should ‘hit’ or ‘miss’ get measured? This appears to be a key part of what the Natural wine movement is about – understanding the product in its raw form, before interventions mould and shape it.

There are a number of examples to select from currently, both imported and local.

A recent trend in Australia particularly, and elsewhere overseas as well, has been a few straight-talking, or ‘followed’ Sommeliers becoming advocates for natural wine. Their wine lists feature examples, sometimes whole sections devoted to the category. Somms are selling natural wines to customers who want something ‘different’, discussion-provoking - and who are happy to pay. This may well be a positive move – also highlighting that wine lists need

to stay fresh and original, and this is one way of doing just that. We will no doubt see some New Zealand Somms considering a similar tack.

A precise definition of Natu-ral Wine proves elusive, and requires some research and an open mind. What I have discov-ered is that there is a plethora of opinion on the topic, and a wide and varied range of wines that meet the overall intent of what Natural wine is. There are a number of books and guidelines for the consumer, but the topic is largely based on individual phi-losophies. There is, of course, a common theme: zero to minimal intervention in the vineyard and winery when it comes to the use of any man-made substances that could direct a wine’s aroma, flavours, acids and tannins; and a well-grounded understanding of Bio-Dynamic and Organic grape

cultivation and wine making.Natural wines seem to be

stuck with a title that doesn’t fit what it really is – wine made in a particular, non-interventionalist way, by people who are dedicated to making it in that way. Whether an individual likes the outcome or not can be said for wines of any style from any place – the appeal is subjective, and the questions are numerous – not the least of which is the ageing potential or otherwise.

So what could be a more appropriate title for this genre of wine? ‘Extreme Bio-Organics’ or EBO, Minimal Intervention Wine or MIW or simply ‘Original’ Wine’? The commercial reality for some producers is already being realised – this style of wine is here to stay – for now. The development of the genre continues. ■

A NATURAL DEBATERecently, I had the fantastic opportunity to attend a tasting of forty ‘Natural’ wines (alongside some fellow wine writers, and three winemakers well-known for their Bio-Dynamic, Organic or ‘Natural’ wines).

fine corks, hand-selected by Alberico Miranda for the Artisan Winemaker

a winning influencesuppliers of fine corks, barrels, screw caps & capsules

www.awiclosures.co.nz

tel +64 (0) 6 879 6074fax +64 (0) 6 879 6974

mob +64 (0) 274 200 002email [email protected]

WineWorks Complex7 James Rochfort Place, RD 5Hastings 4175, New Zealand

Page 45: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 45

REGIONSGISBORNE

I n d e v i n P a r t n e r s h a s launched a $5 million redevelopment project in Gisborne and Hawkes Bay

which will see about 200 hectares of new vines planted over the next five years.

The “Revive” project is excel-lent news for the Gisborne region, where about 70 percent of the redevelopment project will be based.

Indevin regional vineyards manager Andrew Blakeman said about 500,000 new vines would go into the ground across the two regions.

“Most of it is Chardonnay but there will be some Pinot Gris as

well. It is big news for Gisborne because most of the five million we are spending on the development will be there.”

The new vines will be provided by Gisborne’s Riversun Nursery.

“Once we buy the vines, most of the expenditure after that is on labour to actually get them in the ground, and care for them through to full production while they grow,” Blakeman said.

The first phase of planting started on ground that has been empty for four to five years.

The ongoing programme will involve pulling out further vines next autumn and replanting with new stock in spring.

Part of the upgrade is also replacing the trellis spacing in the vineyards.

Gisborne Winegrowers Soci-ety president Doug Bell said the

investment showed Indevin had confidence in the district and the long-term future of the region’s wine industry. ■christinejboycegmailcom

REVIVING GISBORNEC H R I S T I N E B OYC E

Indevin Gisborne winery and vineyard staff gathered at Patutahi Estate to hand plant the first vines for project “Revive”.

Page 46: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

46 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

REGIONSHAWKE’S BAY

A fter lying idle for over a year, the former Corban’s winery in Napier was pur-chased by four local busi-

nessmen just 24 hours before the plant was due to be dismantled.

Most recently owned by Per-nod Ricard New Zealand, the 3.2ha property is now leased to The Hawke’s Bay Wine Company, a contract winemaking business established last year by 2006’s New Zealand Winemaker of the Year Rod McDonald and business partner Mike Farrugia.

McDonald says the former director of sales at Sacred Hill – “a like-minded young man based in Auckland” – brings vital sales, distribution and business develop-ment skills to the mix.

“What separates our company from other contract winemakers in New Zealand is our background. We are committed to making small batches of ultra-premium wine as well as what this place was designed to do – larger commercial volumes.”

The winery, which Corban’s

established in the Pandora indus-trial area in 1986, was considerably upgraded a decade ago. McDon-ald said losing the investment that had gone into the plant would have been “a crying shame” for the Hawke’s Bay wine industry.

“It’s a regional asset and, for us, it’s come along as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to establish the winery as a centre of wine excellence in Hawke’s Bay. Pernod Ricard did a wonderful job in offer-ing the property as a turn-key win-emaking operation. That’s been the important part in making this work for us.”

Formerly chief winemaker at Matariki and before that chief win-emaker for Vidal Estate, McDonald isn’t daunted by the vast scale of the 10,000-tonne winery. In fact, he is delighted by features that include a multitude of automated processes and a colour-coded network of overhead pipelines which he hap-pily sees lightening the processing workload.

“It’s a Rolls Royce in terms of efficiency,” he enthuses.

The site also encompasses a large receival area, a towering silo room housing 18 tanks – each hold-ing up to 140,000 litres – white and red barrel halls with separate tem-perature control systems, a labora-tory, two floors of office space and an outdoor tank farm.

The company employs seven winery staff and two administra-tion staff on site, and expects to take on 12 to 15 cellarhands over harvest. The Hawke’s Bay Wine Company plans to invest in more plant, fine-tuning the winery opera-tion to better handle small batches of super and ultra premium red and white wine.

McDonald hopes companies who are currently trucking grapes, juice or unfinished wine out of the region will consider utilising the Thames Street site to enhance the quality of their product by having their wine made locally. He also sees potential for overseas invest-ment in planting and developing vineyards in Hawke’s Bay.

“We are in a position to provide a full winemaking service and take

their wines to the world through the port of Napier.”

Vineyards, he says, are key to a wine’s unique personality and Hawke’s Bay offers the very best. Committed to the region, McDon-ald is chair of the Mercedes Benz Hawke’s Bay A & P Wine Awards and he chaired Hawke’s Bay Wine-growers for six years.

Counting down the months to the 2014 vintage, he admits to feel-ing excited about what lies ahead.

“Everywhere I turn there is so much potential and I’m looking forward to learning all about this winery and how to get the best results out of it.” ■[email protected]

NEW CONTRACT WINEMAKING FACILITYM A R Y S H A N A H A N

Rod McDonald

Page 47: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

Our primary focus is the same as yoursBetter business. Better careers.

0800 20 80 20 www.primaryito.ac.nz

The Primary Industry Training Organisation has been set up with the primary focus of improving the knowledge and capability of people working in the primary sector.

We’ve combined agriculture, horticulture, equine, sports turf and water industry training under the one banner. We’re united through the shared use of New Zealand’s natural resources - land, plants and water.

Our aim is to improve skills and knowledge across the sector in support of New Zealand’s economic growth.

We offer high quality, relevant workplace qualifications, resulting in better business and better careers, and more opportunities for your growth and success.

Find out how to improve your business or career. Give us a call now or check out our website.

KINGST T54088_WG_A

Page 48: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

48 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

BOB’S BLOG BOB CAMPBELL MW

Naval gazingI am often asked to speak to service organi-

sations or to donate wine or wine courses for various fund raisings. Because I don’t have the resources to satisfy all requests I only sup-port organisations or appeals that are based in Devonport. I am, however, very active in my local community.

I donated my time to organise and run a six-course degustation menu at the Devonport-based navy in the officers mess (“wardroom” I think they call it). It was a very successful even-ing with a great bunch of people who clearly knew a lot about wine.

It occurred to me that the military is an easy-overlooked and potentially lucrative mar-ket. Wines stocked in the officer’s wardroom were a careful selection of reasonably budget labels but a quick chat to their wine buyer revealed a substantial turnover.

At the end of the evening I was presented with a set of cufflinks sporting a bare-breasted maiden, the curious adopted symbol of the navy base HMNZS Philomel. It would make a great wine label.

All who attended the function were formally breathalysed by the military police. Happily I passed although it left me wondering what would have happened if I’d failed?

No American wine invasion ... yetWine importer/distributor Wilson Neill bravely imported a large range

of Californian wines a few decades ago but the wines were expensive and sold slowly. Perhaps the memory of that failed attempt to sell American wines in the New Zealand marketplace has deterred all but a few token US brands being offered here. As someone recently commented when Napa Valley Cabernet was mentioned, “they’re over-oaked, over-priced but thankfully not over here.”

A couple of years ago I was contacted by someone in the US trade office asking about the potential for American wine in this market. I replied that the potential was fairly limited but if a wine enthusiast expat were to import a selection of Pinot Noirs from Oregon and The Russian River Valley they would probably be able to sell at least a modest quantity to local Pinot Noir makers.

I attended this year’s Independence Day celebrations staged by the US Embassy. It was a grand affair with speeches and a choir. We were offered Bourbon-based cocktails, beer and ... Marisco wine from Marlborough. Well done Brent Marris but it would have been nice to have sipped Californian Zinfandel or an Oregon Pinot.

Page 49: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 49

The Six Nations Wine ChallengeEleven years ago I accepted the role of selector and judge

at the Tri-Nations Wine Challenge, a battle of the best from Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. The concept is a simple one. Each selector chooses the best wines in a range of classes and invites the producer to enter the chosen wines in the competition. It’s an honour to be selected and most winer-ies are happy to participate.

In 2011 Argentina and Chile joined in and the event became the Five Nations Wine Challenge. This year we expanded again with the arrival of the US, represented by well known wine critic Dan Berger.

In August I travelled to Sydney to judge nearly 600 wines from six countries. This is clearly my favourite wine competi-tion of the year. It provides a very useful forum to benchmark New Zealand’s finest wines against pretty stiff competition.

Australia earned first place with 1437 points, New Zealand was second with 1327, South Africa hot on our heels (1302), followed by the US (1191), Argentina (942) and Chile (564). It should be noted that Chile was only able to source around half of the required 109 wine entries.

Australia has now won nine times while New Zealand has come first only twice.

Back row, left to right: Huon Hooke (AUS), Judith Kennedy (organiser), Eduardo Brethauer (CH), Middle row: Bob, Dan Berger (US)Front row: Michael Fridjhon (SA), Fabricio Portelli (ARG)

The top wine in each class earns a trophy. A list of the trophy winners is as follows:

Sparkling USA 2007 Gloria Ferrer Blanc de BlancsRiesling AUS 2012 Pressing Matters R9 Aromatic White (not Riesling) ARG 2012 Hess Family Colome Torrontes (NZ earned top points in the class)Other Whites AUS 2009 Gartelmann Benjamin SemillonSauvignon Blanc NZ 2012 Saint Clair Wairau Reserve (NZ earned top points in the class)Chardonnay AUS 2011 Lake’s Folly ChardonnayWhite Blends SA 2011 Tokara Director’s Reserve Sauvignon Blanc SemillonPinot Noir USA 2010 Alysian Wines Hallberg Vineyard CrossroadsMerlot & Carmenere NZ 2010 Villa Maria Reserve Merlot (NZ earned top points in the class)Malbec ARG 2011 Trivento Golden Reserve Shiraz NZ 2010 Kusuda Cab Sauv USA 2009 Kendall-Jackson Grand Reserve Major reds SA 2011 KWV The Mentors PinotageOther Reds USA 2011 Rancho Zabaco ZinfandelBord. Blends ARG 2010 Bodega Noemia 2 Cabernet MerlotRed Blends (non Bord.) USA 2011 Maryhill Winery Richard Batchelor winemaker red CS, Merlot, Shiraz, CFDessert AUS 2008 DeBortoli Noble One Bot Semillon

Earthquakes have cost me dearly. I had a fully booked class in Christchurch a couple of years ago. The Christchurch earthquake struck two weeks before the course and was cancelled. I had a wine course planned for Wellington a couple

of days after the capital had a good shake in August. Several people pulled out of the course although to keep faith with the stoic stayers I ran the course anyway.

Only one tiny tremor was felt during the day but not by

me, I’m simply not tuned into subtle shakes.

The only quake I ever have experienced was in San Francisco in 1980.

I was in a wine warehouse and five-high pallets of wine touched above my head as the

earth heaved. A solid concrete floor came at me like a wave. I was too fascinated to be frightened. That earthquake severely damaged Wente Brothers winery in nearby Livermore. They lost over half their bulk wine.

Shaky wine courses

Page 50: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

50 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

LEGISLATIONUPDATE

THE RULES AROUND LABELLING

V isual marketing of wine is a contentious issue. Supermarkets sell around 80 percent of wine in New

Zealand and it’s extremely diffi-cult to differentiate one’s product when placed on a shelf amongst hundreds of others. Competitive pricing and discounting aside, winemakers look to their label-ling to stand out from the crowd.

Legalities around wine label-ling are precise, as defined by the Ministry of Primary Industries. Not only does the Australia New

Zealand Food Standards Code (ANZFSC) come into account, but many varietal-specific require-ments also need to be included on a wine bottle’s label.

Name and varietyA winery must accurately

describe its product on the label front so it is not misleading, to adhere with Standard 1.2.2 of the Food Standards Code. The name of the wine itself can not be mis-leading – it is advised you don’t go calling your wine “Otago Hills”

when grown and bottled on the Canterbury Plains. This comes under the Fair Trading Act to ensure “labels tell the truth”.

Moreover, the prescribed wine varietal must be included as it identifies the grapes used in the product. This “indicates the true nature” of the wine, as required by the ANZFSC.

An ‘85 percent rule’ applies to such varietal labelling for vintages 2007 onwards. “Wine label state-ments about grape variety, vintage or the area where the grapes were

grown (area of origin) must meet the 85 percent rule,” says the Min-istry of Primary Industries. “If the label states that the wine is from a single grape variety, vintage or area of origin, it must be at least 85 percent from that variety, vintage or area e.g. a ‘2007’ wine must con-tain at least 85 percent of vintage 2007 wine,” the MPI states.

“If the label states the wine is a blend of grape varieties, vin-tages or areas of origin, at least 85 percent of the blend must be from those varieties, vintages or

Wine labelling can be tricky. What can (and can’t) winemakers say on their products’ bottles? Lee Suckling finds out.

- VTR Series ROTARY TRIMMERS

Unique HCL Blade, sucks and trims. Fast efficient action. Clean cut minimises disease risk. Available in a number of

configurations.

PERFECTION IS A PASSION -

PERFORMANCE IS THE RESULT!!

PRECISION CANOPY MANAGEMENT..

www.hclgroup.co.nz, [email protected] FREEPHONE 0800 888 887

GROUP

Page 51: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 51

areas e.g. a “Chardonnay Chenin Blanc” must contain [in descend-ing order] at least 85 percent from Chardonnay and Chenin Blanc grapes.”

Winegrowers cannot make a claim about variety, area or vintage if their product contains a greater percentage of wine from a differ-ent source. “A wine that contains 75 percent Cabernet Sauvignon, 15 percent Pinotage and 10 percent Merlot could be referred to as a ‘Cabernet Pinotage’ or a ‘Cabernet Pinotage Merlot,’” says the MPI, “but not a ‘Cabernet Merlot’.”

Note: up to 50ml of yeasts and spirits (used for fortification) can be excluded from calculations for the 85 percent rule. Wine made in 2006 or prior remains subject to a 75 percent rule.

Origin and other claims“Grape wine must be labelled

in a manner that clearly indicates the country of origin of the wine,” states New Zealand Legislation under Wine Regulations. The physical address of the supplier (which may be the producing win-ery, packer, vendor or importer) also needs to be present.

Net contents (i.e. 750ml) must be declared on the wine label, as must an alcohol content declara-tion and a standard drinks decla-rations (i.e. 8.7 standard drinks). Unless there is only one bottling run for a particular wine, a lot identification number must also be included on the bottle’s label.

Health claimsThe Nutrition, Health and

Related Claims Standard (1.2.7.) came into law in January 2013, and all food/beverage businesses must wholly comply with it by 18 January 2016. It clamps down on the ways in which companies can make health-related claims on their product packaging – for example, no product can claim itself a preventative to a serious disease on its labelling.

Businesses must comply with standards around health and nutrition when using voluntary statements about health on label-ling. Unfortunately, nutritional benefits or health claims can’t be made on grape wine containing more than 1.15 percent alcohol.

A Christchurch winery got into hot water in August this year

Some may speak of range.Others of quality.All speak of

SAVERGLASS AUSTRALIA Pty Ltd289 Flinders Street, Adelaide SA 5000PO Box 6537 (Halifax Street), Adelaide SA 5000Tel. : (08) 8232.0770 / Fax : (08) 8232.0880www.saverglass.com / [email protected]

SAVERGLASS NZ LtdUnit G, 383 Khyber Pass Rd, Newmarket 1023 AucklandPO Box 8020 Symonds St AucklandTel. : (09) 522 2990 / Fax : 09 522 2994www.saverglass.com / [email protected]

SAVERGLASS AUSTRALIA Pty Ltd289 Flinders Street, Adelaide SA 5000PO Box 6537 (Halifax Street), Adelaide SA 5000Tel. : (08) 8232.0770 / Fax : (08) 8232.0880www.saverglass.com / [email protected]

SAVERGLASS NZ LtdUnit G, 383 Khyber Pass Rd, Newmarket 1023 AucklandPO Box 8020 Symonds St AucklandTel. : (09) 522 2990 / Fax : 09 522 2994www.saverglass.com / [email protected]

Internationally respected producers of bottles

for the wine and spirit industries.

Lightweight. Heavyweight. Proprietary. Decorated.

SAVERGLASS AUSTRALIA Pty Ltd289 Flinders Street, Adelaide SA 5000PO Box 6537 (Halifax Street), Adelaide SA 5000Tel. : (08) 8232.0770 / Fax : (08) 8232.0880www.saverglass.com / [email protected] Paul Paleologos: [email protected] Arnold: [email protected]

SAVERGLASS NZ LtdPO Box 8020 Symonds St AucklandTel. : (09) 522 2990 / 021 580 104 Fax : 09 522 2994www.saverglass.com / [email protected]

Page 52: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

52 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

after promoting its product’s levels of resveratrol (an antioxi-dant) offered protection against cancer, arthritis, cardiovascular and Alzheimer’s disease. Luck-ily the winery didn’t make such claims on its packaging – if it had, the company would have breached Standard 1.2.7.

A winemaker can, however, state any wine’s energy (kilojoule/calorie) content, or carbohydrate content, regardless of alcohol vol-ume. Even if your wine is lower in carbohydrates than competitors’ products, you’re not allowed to make marketing statements on your label such as ‘lower in carbs’ or ‘diet’, however, because of the aforementioned Standard.

Allergen declarations must be made on wine labels. If a product contains, or is produced with the aid of milk, egg or fish (except isinglass), this must be stated. If sulphites are contained in the wine (>10mg/Kg of suphur dioxide) this also needs to be declared on the label.

A independent review of food labelling commissioned by the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council in 2011 recommended a “suitably worded warning message about the risks of consuming alcohol while pregnant be mandated on individual containers of alcoholic beverages”. This remains volun-tary. It will be reviewed in Decem-

ber 2013 to potentially become regulation in July 2014.

Wine for exportLabelling on wine for export

isn’t necessarily subject to the ’85 percent rule’. On export labels, claims about vintage, variety and area can be different to New Zea-land labels, but suppliers must adhere to import countries’ local labelling regulations. The require-ments of many nations will dra-matically change a New Zealand wine’s label for export – full details by country can be found at www.icap.org/table/alcoholbeverage-

labeling. For wine exported to the

EU, for example, “wine variety and vintage may not be shown on labels of wine with non-geo-graphical origin; only wine with a proper geographical indication may display such information,” confirms EU regulations. Some French appellations even forbid the mention of grape varieties on front labels. Required infor-mation for exported wine to the EU include statements such as: country of origin and the original name, allergens, actual alcoholic strength, lot number, and contact

details for the bottler, the con-signor or the importer. Addition-ally, all of such information “must appear on a label in a single field of vision (i.e. can be viewed with-out having to turn the bottle)”. The Overseas Market Access Requirements (OMAR) must also be notified under the Wine Act when changes are made to a wine label for export out of New Zealand. ■Sources: Ministry of Primary Industries, Food Standards Australia and New Zealand, ICAP, Europa.eu, Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy.

[email protected]

With Wine File...

• Wineryrecordsareeasytocreateandmaintain• Wineryrecordsarecompletelyauditable• Additivescanbetrackedtothematerialbatchlevel• AugmentsHACCP/StandardOperatingProcedures• YourNZWSMPrecordkeepingneedsaremet

ThesearejustsomeofthereasonswhyWineFileisthewinemakerschoiceforwineryrecordkeepinginAustralia,NewZealandandtheUSA.

Page 53: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013
Page 54: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

54 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

The figures from the 130 winer-ies are broken down into a winery average for four different size cat-egories. As is probably expected, the energy use is affected by the size of the winery, with usage decreasing as the wineries become larger. (See Figure 1.) Being able to compare the performance of a winery against those of a similar size is therefore more valuable than comparing against an indus-try average, the report says.

For the first time the BEST Winery model was included within the analysis. This allowed a winery to compare its energy use to a best practise winery, account-ing for differences in product mix, region and other winery charac-teristics, such as size.

“BEST adds further insight

SWNZUPDATE

INDUSTRY BENCHMARKINGB eing able to compare

your own business with others that are similar is one of the best ways of

determining if you are on the right track. Hence the benchmarking of both wineries and vineyards via information supplied to Sustain-able Winegrowing New Zealand.

Every year the sector’s details supplied through the scorecards have allowed analysts to deter-mine where the optimum range for important areas are. What’s more, the benchmarking has been con-ducted, based on size categories, ensuring comparisons are equa-ble. The BEST Winery model has also been used, with each winery having the chance to benchmark their energy use against an iden-tical winery who is at optimum

performance. All SWNZ winery members have received their indi-vidual reports comparing their data with national and regional information.

WineriesThe most recent report for win-

eries compares two years of data, and looks closely at the changes that have occurred between 2011 and 2012.

Within the analysis 130 winer-ies were compared on energy and water use per litre of wine.

Electricity use was recorded as total kilowatt hours. For the first time in 2012, wineries also recorded their use of LPG, natu-ral gas, diesel and petrol. Wine production was recorded in both litres and tonnes processed.

T E S S A N I C H O L S O N

Figure 1: Electricity use by winery size

into a wineries performance by establishing a benchmark against an identical winery, rather than simply benchmarking against sim-ilarly sized wineries,” the report states. Benchmarking only on win-eries of a similar size can lead you into a false sense of security, given each winery has its own unique BEST target. (Region, varietal mix, which impact alongside the size.)

Proving that point, the report shows comparisons between three wineries of similar size which appear to have very differ-ent energy usage. While it would look as though some appear more energy efficient than others, on closer analysis, they are all either meeting or just about meeting their individual BEST target.

“When (a number) of factors are taken into account, through the BEST model, they are shown to be equally energy efficient and that production mix, processes and regional differences account for the significant difference.”

WaterTotal water use was recorded

by the 130 wineries and bench-marks were established as L/L wine and L/t grapes. Benchmarks were established for similar sized

Page 55: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 55

Figure 2: Water uses by winery size

wineries and the results compared to the 2011 vintage.

While most regions do not have to pay for their water, making it an inexpensive resource, there are other costs involved. The energy used to pump water and the cost of resource consents has to be taken into consideration. However the benchmarking report says there are concerns that have arisen in the past 12 months, in particular that of water disposal, which is directly related to water use.

“Over the next few years dis-posal systems and resource con-sents will increase in complexity and become more difficult to obtain; consequently operating costs will increase.”

While energy usage was seen to correlate to the size of the win-ery, it was not a similar situation in terms of water use. (See Figure 2).

Comparisons of water and energy usage between 2011 and

2012 make up this benchmark-ing report. Based on scorecards from 1,621 vineyards, covering a

total of 31,755 ha, this represents approximately 93% of all likely scorecards and 89% of the total

area in the Sustainable Winegrow-ing NZ programme.

In terms of electricity, there

Page 56: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

56 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

Irrigated vineyards

(ha)

Irrigated area (%)

2011/12 2010/11

Water use incl. in

scorecard(% irri. area)

Water use

(mm)1

Water use (mm)1

Auckland 11 4% - 0 0

Gisborne 31 2% 100% 46 0

Hawkes Bay 3,491 81% 80% 55 92

Wgtn / Wairarapa 661 87% 95% 19 82

Nelson 698 80% 68% 46 80

Marlborough 19,189 90% 86% 94 104

Waipara 905 86% 90% 86 85

Canterbury 124 92% 71% 14 77

Otago 1,434 93% 93% 97 87

New Zealand 26,544 84% 86% 84 99

Figure 3: Average quantity applied per scorecard

was a change in recordings, with the 2012 usage recorded as total kilowatt hours. Previously it had been recorded as kWh per hectare.

Energy use is not an easy area to monitor, given that many vineyards are sited around homesteads, hence difficulties in separating vineyard usage from private. Also with a vast number of vineyards utilising contract staff, there is another difficulty in gaining a true perspective of how much fuel is used.

WaterIt is easier to record the use

of water, particularly where the vineyard irrigates. The score-cards show that last year 1,268 vineyards, covering an area of 26,544ha could be irrigated (84% of the total area). The report has been able to separate how much water was applied and relate that to rainfall data from two locations in each region. Given climatic dif-ferences between wine growing regions combined with soil struc-tures, there were obvious differ-ences throughout the country.

On average irrigated vineyards applied 84mm of water in the 2011/12 season, which was 15% less than the year before. The industry average was 96mm. This figure is calculated by dividing the total water use by the irrigated area. (see Figure 3).

Fifty-five percent of growers (51% in Marlborough) used soil moisture monitoring. On average those using soil moisture moni-toring applied 91mm compared to an overall average of 84mm. In Marlborough, the monitored vine-yards applied 102mm, compared to 87mm where soil moisture monitoring was not used. (The overall average was 04mm).

However these figures change when you change the parameters and assess as a regional or national average, (total quantity of water applied divided by total irrigation area, where larger vineyards have

a greater influence on the result) rather than a vineyard average where all vineyards provide equal contributions.

In this scenario monitored vineyards applied 92mm and those not monitoring applied 106mm.

In Marlborough’s case the monitored vineyards applied 101mm, compared with 117mm on unmonitored vineyards.

“Larger vineyards with soil moisture monitoring are apply-ing upwards of 15% less water compared to unmonitored vine-yards. Those larger vineyards that are not monitoring are applying 30 – 40% more water compared to similarly unmonitored but smaller vineyards. This suggests that monitoring is considerably more important as vineyards increase in size and management structures become more complex.”

In Hawke’s Bay there was a sub-stantial decrease in water applied in the 2011/12 year – 40% less than in the 2010/11 season. That was put down to the high rainfall between October and March. However when weather stats were consid-ered, it showed that the 2009/10 period had even higher rainfall, so there was no obvious reason for the sudden drop in irrigation. The report has developed a soil deficit

model to determine the effective rainfall, by taking into account runoff and percolation below the active root zone.

“For example the total rainfall in January 2012 was 104mm, but for an irrigated crop on medium soil only 23mm of this was effec-tive. Eighty millimetres fell on the 7th and 8th of January, with most of this running off.”

There is still some fine-tuning to be undertaken on this model, and a number of factors need to be taken into account, such as soil types, growth stages and irrigation strategy. The full Vineyard Irrigation Report for 2011/12 is available at www.nzwine.com, in the members sec-tion, under reports.■[email protected]

Page 57: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

Contact - Hayden Mills: Mob. 021 554 987 or Nicola Allington : Mob. 021 554 954 Silvan New Zealand: P.O. Box 10088 Te Rapa, Hamilton 3241 Call Free: 0508 745 826 - Visit www.silvannz.co.nzT: 07 849 6030 - F: 07 849 6070 - E: [email protected]

EVO VINEYARD SPRAYERSIivan Evo vineyard sprayers combine superior coverage with the efficiency of two or three row spraying in one pass

EVO 2 OVERROW VINEYARD SPRAYERSilvan’s Evo vineyard sprayer has been purpose built for taller vine crops,to clear overhead sprinklers and incorporates individually adjustablenozzles to match the growth of the canopy or foliage.• 28 multi angle adjustable air outlets via 4 air tubes for 2 row coverage

42 multi angle adjustable air outlets via 6 air tubes for 3 row coverage• Automatic flow rate control with on-the-go application rate adjustment

TWIN IMPELLER FAN Silvan’s new twin impeller fan provides higher air volumes for greater spraying flexibility & more efficient operation.

AIR SHEAR NOZZZLESAdjustable air shear nozzles that desperse a spray laden air stream with a droplet range between 80-120 micron.

HYDRAULIC OPERATIONSIndependent hydraulic arm fold is standard. Optional roller row width adjustment

SPRAYER RANGESilvan have a range of vineyard sprayers including a 600L overrow linkage model

Page 58: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

58 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

VARIETYUPDATE

FOR THE LOVE OF CHENINJ O E L L E T H O M S O N

F or a wine which is often on the lips of Kiwi win-emakers, Chenin Blanc is surprisingly rare in their

vineyards. There are just 22.9 producing

hectares in New Zealand today, according to the latest statistics from New Zealand Winegrowers.

It’s planted everywhere from Gisborne, Martinborough and Marlborough to North Canterbury and Central Otago. And even per-mitting for a small margin of error, 22.9 hectares is nothing to write home about (Arneis and Gruner Veltliner both have more vines in the ground, with 34 and 36 hec-tares each, respectively).

Mind you, that 22.9 hectares is

a whopping 3.8 hectares more than last year’s 19.1 hectares of Chenin Blanc planted nationwide.

So, where has the vineyard growth been? And in a wine culture obsessed with number crunching - which so often defines which wines, regions and competitions garner the most attention - does it even matter where that Chenin Blanc growth is?

Matt Dicey from Mt Difficulty has planted 0.7 of a hectare of Chenin Blanc at the winery’s Long Gully Vineyard in Bannockburn with a new ENTAV clone from Riv-ersun and Nicholas Brown from Black Estate in North Canterbury has planted an experimental cou-ple of rows too. There are others

who are trialling similarly small sections of their vineyards with it. And New Zealand’s greatest Chenin protagonist, James Mill-ton, is so hopeful about the poten-tial of Chenin Blanc now that new clones from France are available here, that he is increasing the over-all percentage he grows. Currently, 40% of The Millton Vineyard’s land is planted to Chenin.

“The reason I’ve been looking for better material is that I’ve been wanting some looser bunched clones and some of the French ones. About five years ago River-sun brought some in, so we’re just beginning to get grapes now,” says Millton.

“It’s now our 30th vintage and

leading up to this time, we’ve been thinking we should come up with something new, but we decided that for every bottle of, say, Alba-rino – if we planted that – then it would be one bottle of Chenin Blanc we didn’t sell. So we’re replanting older vineyards with new clones of Chenin and we’re going to plant more Chenin in some other smaller sites.”

One of the most pivotal things that led to Millton’s decision to grow more Chenin Blanc in Gis-borne is that the wines can be made without needing any adjust-ments in the winery, in terms of acidity, sugar and finings.

“If you’re looking for a wine which has a sense of terroir,

Page 59: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 59

then Chenin Blanc is the vari-ety that has it,” Millton says. “I would love to collaborate, to share the joy, passion and intrigue of Chenin Blanc with other like-minded winemakers and make this great classic wine better known to New Zealanders.

“The whole point about Chenin is that because it doesn’t have a frilly little dress – ie, lots of aro-matics – then you have to create another structure in the wine. Its high acids give it the potential to make profound intelligent wines,” says Millton, who first planted Chenin Blanc in 1978 when grow-ing grapes for Corbans.

In 1984, he and Annie made their first Millton Chenin Blanc.

“We left the grapes hanging out to get some botrytis and the night we made our Chenin Blanc Late Harvest for the first time, we opened a bottle of 1949 Moulin Touche (a Chenin Blanc) and said to each other: ‘XXX (unprintable), this is outstanding that a wine can have this purity and complexity at that age’ - that’s what turned the lights on for us.”

Millton bought that bottle from a private collection in Syd-ney. He went back and bought more from 1911 (the birth year of winemaker Hatsch Kalberer’s father – they gave that bottle to Hatch) along with bottles from 1949, 1959 and 1963.

“I’m a stickler for looking to the old world for inspiration and look-ing at the soil that you’re standing on and seeing what the potential is. My inspiration is the classics.”

Gordon Russell from Esk Valley in Hawke’s Bay has also been mak-ing Chenin Blanc for long enough to look back to older wines and see great longevity in them, although Chenin is not always the easiest grape to grow.

“It’s very prone to botrytis, so viticulturally it’s not necessarily easy. It needs good sites, low yields and a lot of attention to get the best out of it,” says Russell, who

has two vineyards from which he sources Chenin Blanc - one prone to botrytis, from which he tends to make sweet wines; the other cool with stony soils, from which he makes dry Chenin Blanc.

Further south, big bunches, loose clusters, intense flavours and long hang time are the story of Chenin Blanc at Mt Difficulty in Bannockburn after two harvests.

“It’s early days and we don’t have any expectations because there is no history for us of Chenin Blanc,” says winemaker Matt Dicey.

“We thought it would have good suitability for our environ-ment because of how we’ve seen it operating in France. We want to let the grapes speak for them-selves and influence the wines we made over five years or so, then we can formulate a style and go from there,” Dicey says.

The first vintage was 2012. Thanks to late ripening and long

hang time, the residual sugar in the 2012 finished wine was 55 grams per litre but this year the brix were slightly lower, although pick-ing time was again at the tail end of the season, so RS will be around the 50 gram mark with pH of about 3.

“We haven’t wanted to muck with the wine. It has much higher malic acid than Riesling, so it’s a more active acidity than what we’ve seen out of New Zealand.

“It’s a completely different style. The main aim is to see where the mature vines lead us stylisti-cally. We want the vineyard to drive our decisions rather than us drive the vineyard decisions. It’s only season two for us here in Central but we think we’d like to plant more because the wine is good.”

Gordon Russell recalls great Chenin Blancs being made at Col-lard’s Wines in West Auckland in the 1980s, but says that, even then,

the variety was underrated, due to being used as a bit of a workhorse grape.

“It was usually used as a bulk wine and blended with Muller Thurgau, so its own expression was lost, but Collard’s Wines made incredible stand alone vari-etal Chenin Blancs, which some of us remember. Chenin’s beauty then skipped a generation or two and now it’s come round again, so that a lot of new winemakers are looking, and thinking, ‘Why are we making Gruner-Veltliner, Arneis and Fiano, which in some respects are very minor global varieties, when Chenin Blanc is having a heyday in South Africa and it’s always popular in French restaurants.”

“Chenin is a potentially bet-ter example of a great white grape than some of these others that are coming into vogue,” says Russell. ■

[email protected]

Matt Dicey, Mt Difficulty winemaker.

Page 60: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

60 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

Villa Maria’s project manager Emma Taylor is one busy woman. The former ‘city girl’ is now one of the stars of viticulture.

INDUSTRYPROFILE

M A R Y S H A N A H A N

A New Zealand Viticultur-ist and Horticulturist of the Year, organiser of this year’s Bragato Confer-

ence, former chair of the Hawke’s Bay Focus Vineyard Committee, on the New Zealand Winegrowers’ research committee, a Master of Science – Emma Taylor is as busy as she is bright.

Currently project manager for Villa Maria, the 36-year-old has

TAYLORED FOR THE JOB

Branches throughout New Zealand | www.waterforce.co.nz | 0800 436 723

WaterForce, a fully accredited water meter service provider– Telemetry units– Water meters– Installation & verification

Contact our experienced team of specialists to discuss your water metering requirements.

Page 61: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 61

M A R Y S H A N A H A Nbeen with the company for com-ing up 14 years.

Originally a city girl, she says she could never have imagined herself working in vineyards when she left Corran School in Auckland to study geography at the Univer-sity of Otago. It was her Master’s degree in physical geography that steered her into viticulture.

“I’d been watching Country Calendar on James Millton and his viticultural practices and won-dered what was different about the soils on his organic Gisborne vineyard.”

What the owner of Millton Vineyards and Winery had to say on the television programme informed Emma’s thesis topic – an investigation into copper accumulation in vineyard soils. With the help of a $2000 New Zealand Winegrowers’ grant, she travelled to New Zealand’s major wine regions to collect over 1000 soil samples.

Emma found high accumula-tions of copper in some very old vineyards but none that were at toxic levels.

“At the time, the New Zealand industry was starting to turn away from copper,” she says.

Undertaking the research, the 21-year-old was struck by how friendly growers were.

“They were so helpful and even asked my opinion about their grapes and what they should be using for sprays. I thought, wow, these people are hungry for infor-mation.

“I still find everyone in the industry very open-minded. It’s not dominated by people who have been in it for generations and think they know it all.”

Impressed by the attitudes she’d encountered, Emma decided

to pursue a career in viticulture.Her start with Villa Maria was

a one-off seasonal job, working the 2000 vintage in Hawke’s Bay. After six months she was offered a cadetship, which covered many more aspects of the industry.

At the time, the company’s head of sales, head winemaker and head viticulturist roles were filled by women.

“That helped make me feel there was nothing in the indus-try women couldn’t do. George Fistonich, Villa Maria’s owner, is not afraid to let people show their strengths. I was only 25 years old when he appointed me company viticulturist. That was a really big call at the time.”

Emma had been working as a research viticulturist for Villa Maria when she and husband Chris Meynell decided it was time for an OE.

They were on their travels when Fistonich phoned to ask if she was interested in the position of company viticulturist. They agreed she would start the job in eight months for the 2004 harvest in Hawke’s Bay.

While Villa Maria takes more grapes from Marlborough, the company’s largest acreage is in Hawke’s Bay.

“It owns a quarter of Gimblett Gravels, and that’s really impor-tant to us.”

Emma held the company viticulturist’s role for four years until taking parental leave. Liv-ing in Napier, the couple now have three daughters – Ellie (6), Olivia (5) and Kate (2).

Ellie was four months old when Emma won New Zealand Viticulturist of the Year. Because Meynell was a teacher – he is now principal of Marewa School – they

TAYLORED FOR THE JOB

www.asurequality.comwww.wineworks.co.nz

A partnership offering total quality assurance

WineWorks is New Zealand’s largest contract bottler. It has partnered with AsureQuality to provide its customers with an integrated range of services, from the time the wine is ready to be bottled, through to final distribution.

TogeTher We offer:

• ExportwinetestingtomeetEUandothercountryrequirements

• Residueanalysis

• Chemicalanalysis

• Microbiologytesting

• Allergentesting

• Forensicinvestigations

AsureQuality and WineWorks working together

Talk to us todayAsureQuality 0508 00 11 22

WineWorks 03 577 8166 or 06 879 7879

Page 62: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

62 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

worked the travel prize around school holidays, exploring the Hunter Valley, Barossa Valley and Mornington Peninsula wine regions.

“I’m really glad to have focused on Australian wine regions and can appreciate the New Zealand indus-try’s collaboration with the South Australia Research and Develop-ment Institute.”

After maternity leave, Emma took on the viticulture project manager’s role, assessing major purchases and developments. Ini-tially based at Vidal’s in Hastings, she is delighted to be surrounded now by vineyards at Te Awa Estate, purchased by Villa Maria in Octo-ber last year.

“I think Hawke’s Bay is prob-ably the best place in New Zealand. It’s got an amazing climate, offers so many activities and, combined, Napier and Hastings have quite a large population.

“In terms of its viticulture, Hawke’s Bay is a complicated region with so many subregions and varieties. That makes it hard to tell a regional story because other wine regions promote a single variety.

“But we’re the fruit bowl of New Zealand and the fruit bowl of varieties.

“We do fantastic Chardonnays, great Syrahs and Bordeaux blends. What’s wrong with telling all those stories?

“If the GI (Geographic Indica-tors) Bill goes through, that may help us do that.”

Emma continues to welcome the challenges that come with the variety in her work.

“The beauty of viticulture,” she says, “is that every site is different and responds differently to differ-ent practices. I wouldn’t want to be doing anything else.” ■[email protected]

IWC DATES CHANGE

A fter 30 years the IWC is making a fundamental change in its judging schedule. Organisers realise that judging in April does not fit with the Southern Hemisphere produc-tion or promotional schedules - releasing results in May,

trophies in June and champions in September is too late in the wines’ promotional schedule.

So from the 2014 competition, tasting will take place on two separate occasions: IWC 2014 Tranche 1 will take place in Novem-ber 2013. IWC 2014 Tranche 2, including trophy judging, will take place in April 2014

A producer can then decide which Tranche to enter but can only enter a wine of a particular vintage once. However, different vintages of a particular wine may be entered in the same IWC year.

Trance 1 results will be announced on December 4, 2013 up to Gold medal status. Trance 2 results will be announced on May 7, 2014 up to Gold medal status.

Those wines that have won a Gold medal in Tranche 1 will then be held in temperature-controlled storage by the IWC until April. Then these wines will be flighted with Gold medal wines from Tranche 2 to obtain the Trophies, International Trophies and Champions.

Trophies will then be announced at an IWC Event held in May 2014. Champions and the IWC Merchant Awards will be announced at the IWC Gala Awards Dinner in July 2014. ■

Page 63: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 63

- WINE TANKS- RECEIVAL BINS- CATWALKS- HEAT EXCHANGERS

FOR SALES ENQUIRIES CONTACT:ANDREW HORTONPhone +64 3 214 4817Fax +64 3 218 3354Mobile +64 21 276 9676

[email protected]

wwwww.crownsheetmetal.co.nz

For Expert Viticultural Property Advice

ALEXANDERHAYWARD LTD

Registered Valuers,Property Consultants, Arbitrators

Specialising in all aspects of Vineyard and Winery Valuation, Including Specialist Plant

and Machinery

Contact:Dave Stark B Ag Com, FNZIV, FNZPI

Lex Hayward Dip VFM, FNZPI, AAMINZ

Experienced in all South Island Winegrowing Regions

Ph 03 5789776 Level 1, 20 Market St, BLENHEIMFax 03 5782806 email [email protected]

For information and technical support call toll-free

0800 430 430 Email: [email protected]: www.bondor.co.nz

• FIRE RATED • INSULATED • WEATHERTIGHT • GREEN

Insulated panel suppliers and installers to the grape and wine

industry for over 30 years

IDEAL for processing areas, barrel stores, tasting rooms, cellars, cooperage halls, offices and temporary

accommodation.

PROVIDES stable and easily controlled low temperature environments.

SUITABLE for effective humidity control.

SOLID wall construction reduces vibration.

EPS, Mineral wool & XFlam Insulated Panels

Page 64: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

64 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

WINEAWARDS

PINOT NOIR TAKES TOP HONOURS

Champion Wine of Show and Bragato Trophy WinnerAkarua Pinot Noir 2011Akarua – Central OtagoMark NaismithRichard Smart Trophy and Reserve Champion WineVilla Maria Single Vineyard Taylors Pass Chardonnay 2011Taylors Pass Vineyard - MarlboroughIan BuckFriedrich Wohnsiedler Trophy and Champion RieslingWither Hills Cellar Release Kerseley Riesling 2012Kerseley - MarlboroughWendy and Owen GloverBrother Cyprian Trophy and Champion Pinot GrisThornbury Waipara Pinot Gris 2013Waiata Vineyard - WaiparaRoyce MckeanNew Zealand Wine Cellars Spence Brothers Trophy and Champion Sauvignon BlancSaint Clair Pioneer Block 1 Foundation Sauvignon Blanc 2012Swamp Road Vineyard - MarlboroughPhillip & Cheryl Sowman

Bill Irwin Trophy and Champion ChardonnayVilla Maria Single Vineyard Taylors Pass Chardonnay 2011Taylors Pass Vineyard - MarlboroughIan BuckMike Wolter Memorial Trophy and Champion Pinot NoirAkarua Pinot Noir 2011Akarua – Central OtagoMark Naismith

Alan Limmer Trophy and Champion SyrahVidal Legacy Series Gimblett Gravels Syrah 2009Omahu Gravels Vineyard – Hawkes BayPhil HoldenTom Mcdonald Memorial Trophy and Champion Classical Red WineVilla Maria Reserve Gimblett Gravels Cabernet Sauvignon Merlot 2010Vidal Vineyard - Hawkes BayPhil HoldenChampion SparklingAkarua Rosé Brut NVAkarua – Central OtagoMark NaismithChampion GewürztraminerZephyr Gewürztraminer 2012Glover Family Vineyards - MarlboroughOwen Glover Champion Other White WineCoopers Creek Sv Gisborne Albariño Bell-Ringer 2013Bell Vineyard – GisborneDoug and Delwyn BellChampion Other Red WineWaimea Trev’s Red 2012Waimea Estates Nelson LtdTrevor and Ben BolithoChampion RoséClearview Black Reef BlushClearview EstateTim Turvey And Helma Van Den BergChampion DessertVilla Maria Reserve Marlborough Noble Riesling 2012Roncenvin Estate Vineyard – MarlboroughChris FletcherSustainability TrophyAkarua Pinot Noir 2011Akarua – Central OtagoMark Naismith

BRAGATO WINE AWARDS RESULTSI f there was a star at this year’s Romeo Bragato Wine Awards, it would have to be Central Otago’s Akarua

Vineyard.Not only did it take out the

Champion Pinot Noir trophy, it also won Champion Wine of the Show, the Sustainability Trophy, plus Champion Sparkling Wine.

Akarua Vineyard is situated in the beautiful Bannockburn sub region. The 50ha vineyard is sepa-rated into three distinct blocks, and produces not only Pinot Noir, but also Chardonnay, Riesling and Pinot Gris.

Vineyard Manager Mark Nai-smith says the trophies were a tribute the property and the Cen-tral Otago sub region.

“Our aim at Akarua vineyard is to supply our winemaking team with premium quality fruit that expresses the unique terroir of our site.”

Winemaker Matt Connelll said the fruit quality from 2011 stood out early on.

“While Pinot Noirs from the 2010 vintage in Central Otago were noted for their power and concentration, the cooler 2011 vintage reflected in the wine,” he said. “The trophy winning wine has captivating aro-matics of florals and spice, a beautifully poised palate that is complex, with excel-lent fruit weight and fine tannins.”

The Akarua vineyard was first planted in 1996 and is the largest family owned estate in Central Otago. ■

Page 65: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

ALWAYS REFER TO THE LABEL BEFORE USERegistered pursuant to the ACVM Act 1997 P8381. Copyright ©2011 DuPont. All rights reserved. DuPont (New Zealand) Limited. 666 Great South Road, Greenlane, Auckland 1051. Phone 0800 658 080. The DuPont Oval Logo, DuPont™, The miracles of science™ and Talendo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of DuPont or its affiliates. DPNZ0018/W.

Premium protection from Powdery mildewDuPont™ Talendo® provides greater flexibility and offers you a wide range of benefits.

• Talendo® delivers long lasting protection from the damage caused by Powdery mildew• It prevents spores from getting established and reduces the existing spore load • Talendo® also features translaminar, vapour and local systemic activity that enhances

coverage providing excellent disease protection• Talendo® comes in an easy to use liquid formulation making the mixing and handling simple.

For more information on successful fungicide programs, visit www.cropprotection.dupont.co.nz

DuPont™

Talendo®

fungicide

DPNZ0018_WG_297x210_v3.indd 1 26/07/12 11:08 AM

Page 66: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

66 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

NOT ON THE LABELLEGAL MATTERS WITH MARIJA BATISTICH

SENIOR ASSOCIATE AND ANNA HOLLAND, SOLICITOR, BOTH AT BELL GULLY

I t is widely recognised that the wine industry depends h e av i l y o n e m p l o y i n g seasonal workers. What

may come as more of a surprise is that seasonal employment is not a recognised category of e mpl o yme nt unde r the Employment Relations Act (ERA). This article clarifies the nature of seasonal employment, and sets out tips for employers.

What is seasonal employment?

Seasonal employment is not recognised by the ERA as a category of employment. Rather, seasonal employment is likely to fall within the legal category of fixed term employment or casual employment.

It is important to have written agreements with all employees, identifying whether they are permanent, fixed term or casual. An employment relationship is defined by its “real nature”, rather than the associated paperwork. This means that it is important to correctly categorise the true nature of employment at the outset, when hiring for the season.

Fixed term employmentSeasonal employment is

fixed term employment if an individuals’ employment will end:

on the occurrence of specified event (for example, the end of a season); or

at the conclusion of a specified project (for example, at the end of

harvest).Before entering into a fixed

term employment, an employer is required to:

advise the employee when or how their employment will end, and the reason for it ending in that way; and

have genuine reasons based on reasonable grounds for specifying the employment of an employee is to end in that particular way.

A good example of a genuine reason for a fixed term employ-ment relationship is where an employer takes on extra staff tem-porarily for the length of time it will take to harvest. On the other hand, employing an individual for the purpose of establishing their suitability for permanent employ-ment is not a genuine reason for a fixed term employment relation-ship. (Put another way, fixed term employment cannot be used as a probationary period or “trial”.) Where a fixed term employ-ment agreement is not based on genuine reason, the employment relationship will be deemed per-manent and any termination at the employer’s initiative will be a dismissal, rather than the expiry of a fixed term.

An employer with good reason to employ on a fixed term basis should ensure that the employee’s fixed term employment agreement clearly sets out the way in which the employment relationship will end, and the reasons for it ending in that way. Failure to do so will deem the employment

relationship permanent. An employee’s fixed term

employment can be renewed before its expiry date for another fixed term where there is genuine reason based on reasonable grounds to enter into another fixed term employment relationship. For example, an individual initially employed to harvest for the season may be offered another month’s work to assist with processing. However, there is a limit to how frequently renewal may reasonably occur before an employment relationship becomes permanent.

Earlier this year the Employ-ment Court ruled in the Talleys Group case that an employer who employed an employee on a fixed term basis to perform seasonal tasks, then seamlessly re-engaged the employee consistently over a long period of time to work on other seasonal tasks, did not have a genuine reason for fixed term employment. In that case, the employer was a seafood proces-sor, and each “season” of work related to different processing work, according to catch variety. The Court held that the employee who had worked for Talleys more or less continuously for a number of years was in reality a permanent employee, and her employment relationship was of indefinite duration.

Casual employmentCasual employment is another

legally recognised category of

employment. The following characteristics are indicators of a genuine casual employment relationship:

employment is for short periods, for specific purposes, on an “as and when required” basis;

there is no regularity or continuity of work;

the employee is free to work for others;

the e mplo ye r of f e rs no guarantee of future work;

work is not allocated to the employee in advance (for example, by a roster);

either party can terminate the employment relationship “on the day” without providing notice of a minimum period to the other; and/or

t h e r e ’ s n o l e g i t i m a t e e x p e c t a t i o n o f o n g o i n g employment.

Each time a casual employee goes to work counts as a separate engagement with their employer. A casual employment relationship may change over time to become permanent in the event that engagements become regular or routine.

A c a s u a l e m p l o y m e n t agreement should set out clearly that the employee is employment as a casual employee on an irregular, intermittent basis, and that further employment is not guaranteed. Casual employees are entitled to annual leave, which is calculated at eight percent of their gross earnings and paid at the same time as their wage. ■

ALL IN A SEASON’S WORK

Page 67: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 67

INDUSTRYNEWS

S ince 2009, NZ Tube Mills product devel-opment engineers have worked closely with winegrowers and viticulturists to develop EcoTrellis steel posts and wire

clips. Their research involved intensive testing of steel posts used in New Zealand vineyards to analyse success and failure rates in extreme weather conditions and thus determine a safety range for the post design.

EcoTrellis offers a complete vineyard trellis-ing solution using posts, clips and strainers as relevant to site location. It’s the perfect system for both new vineyard developments and the replacement of damaged wooden posts.

Growers are no longer allowed to use wooden posts in organic vineyard develop-ments in Australia or New Zealand. EcoTrellis offers an ideal alternative and wineries such as

Villa Maria and Pegasus Bay are using EcoTrellis for the development of new organic vineyards. Pernod Ricard has already been using EcoTrellis in Marlborough for some time for their organic plantings.

In Marlborough EcoTrellis works closely with Marcus Wickham. Together they have just released a new Self Releasing Rotalock Vineyard clip which is designed to work with the KLIMA machine.

EcoTrellis has also secured some major vineyard contracts with the steel posts including Ara Wines in Marlborough and NZ Vineyard Estates in Cen-tral Otago. Both of these new developments are planned for this spring. ■

A REVOLUTIONARY NEW TRELLISING SYSTEM

Page 68: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

68 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

REGIONSGISBORNE

COOPERS PIONEERS MARSANNEPioneering and adventurous or off the track? Alternative varieties polarize people but without them the world of wine would shrink, writes Joelle Thomson.

T aste is one thing but pro-nounceability of new and unheard of experimental wines is at least as important,

says winemaker Simon Nunns, who has just released what is thought to be New Zealand’s first single varietal Marsanne – the 2013 Coopers Creek Gisborne Marsanne Allison.

The 13% alcohol wine is bone dry at 2.5 grams per litre of residual sugar and acid of 6.8 grams. It was made with grapes grown on Doug and Delwyn Bell’s Gisborne vineyard and is named after Doug’s Curtiss Kittyhawk, which is named – you guessed it – Allison. Reconditioned V12 warbirds aside, the wine has been a long time coming.

“The grapes have been waiting for us to use since 2011; a vintage which we didn’t harvest because they went rot-ten and the same happened in 2012. It’s a really difficult grape because in those two wet years when everything else was 20 brix, the Marsanne was probably about 16 and it was going rotten. So it’s going to be a decidedly challeng-ing grape for the future,” says Nunns.

Conversely, in 2013 the fruit was pristine. Nunns says they were able to get it as ripe as they wanted this year.

Based on the last three vintages he predicts there will be difficult years for Marsanne. There may also be other areas to search for in terms of Mar-sanne’s suitability.

“Drier areas are worth a crack but the variety also needs relative heat.”

While time on the vine may counter the heat issue, at least in part, he says this won’t fix that issue entirely because it lags behind the other varieties by at least a week or two. Marsanne is still in the trial and error category for Nunns; particularly based on 2011 and 2012.

While Nunns is particularly keen to keep trialling Marsanne, he concedes its challenges.

“I’m interested to see what it can do. It might be that it really lends itself to blending with other varieties but certainly that’s not the plan at the moment.”

In contrast, Albarino is a wine Nunns is extremely enthusiastic about.

Like many winemakers in New Zea-land today, he has experimented with making Viognier, Arneis and Gruner Veltliner, among others, but of all those

he has tried it’s the Alabarino that ticks the most boxes.

“Without a shadow of a doubt Albarino is our most promising newcomer.

When people look at Arneis, Gruner Veltliner and Viognier, they don’t know how to pro-nounce any of them whereas they look at Albarino and it has the right combina-tion of vowels and con-sonants. It’s easy to say and seems to roll off the tongue, so people are more enthusiastic about buying it. And it’s tasty as well.”

T h e C o o p e r s Creek Sv Gisborne A l b a r i n o B e l l -Ringer has been stacking up the medals and tro-phies in the past few years. Also grown on Doug a n d D e l w y n Bell’s property, it recently won t h e R o m e o Bragato Tro-phy for Cham-pion O the r White Wine. ■

[email protected]

Simon Nunns

Page 69: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 69

COOPERS PIONEERS MARSANNE

BIRD NETTING❱❱ ZoneNet™ sidenetting❱❱ Polyside mono hybrid❱❱ TitanHex SE™

❱❱ Vine netting – single & multi row diamond

❱❱ Made to order nets

PO Box 36084, 421 Selwyn St, ChristchurchPhone: 03-338 6296

also: 91a Richard Pearse Drive, Manukau, AucklandEmail: [email protected]

www. panprint.co.nz

“The proof of quality is in the tasting, the

promise of quality is in the presentation”

New Zealand’s most awarded label printing company. (NZ Pride in Print Annual Awards)

• Winners of two World Label Awards for

Quality Labels in 2012.

• Panprint employs the very latest print,

rewind and quality inspection technology

from Europe.

• Specialists in water resistant and scuff

resistant coatings.

MAKING YOUR PRODUCTS LOOK GREAT

GREAT VINES BEGIN WITH NURTURING CARE

plantCERTIfIEd VINESWITH CoNfIdENCE

CALL US oN 0800 444 614

View our catalogue online www.mistyvalley.co.nz

Rex on 027 49 80 [email protected]

Donna on 021 84 98 [email protected]

Manufactured in New Zealand for New Zealand conditions

A patented interlocking frame system restricts movement during a quake

Cross section of patented support system

Frame support

pole, locates well

into the legs

For further information please contact:

Kevin Roughton 021 438 920email: [email protected]: www.kernohan.co.nz

Wine Barrel Racks

Two

models

available

We also do

Puncheons

Page 70: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

70 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

NEWSINSURANCE

PRODUCT CONTAMINATION UPDATEG A R R Y R M O O N E Y, M A N A G I N G D I R E C T O R ,

I C I B L I M I T E D I N S U R A N C E B R O K E R S

C ould your business with-stand the effects of prod-uct contamination or tampering, leading to a

potential product recall, brand damage and loss of income?

The recent Fonterra crisis has highlighted the importance of businesses having a robust product recall programme and, as part of their risk management programme, insurance protection for contaminated products, recall costs, loss of income and access to an external crisis management consultant.

Companies operating in the food and beverage industry are vulnerable to product contami-nation, tamper or extortion. Regardless of how sophisticated their food safety programme and

quality management plans are, both accidental contaminations and product tamperings can and do occur.

In some cases the problem has had a devastating effect on the company’s reputation and finan-cial viability, especially when the contamination has the potential to cause bodily injury, or affects a large volume of stock.

A single incident and any sub-sequent media coverage can pose a significant threat to consumer confidence, hard-won retail space, important contracts, market share, brand credibility, reputa-tion and profit.

Overseas markets are now looking for their suppliers to have the necessary protection and procedures in place in Garry Mooney

Kate Gibbs (B.Hort.Sci)

STANMORE FARM LTDRD1 Te Horo, OtakiPh 0800 STANMORE or 027 440 9814Email: [email protected]: www.stanmorefarm.co.nz

Suppliers of Certified VinesViticultural expertise and advice. Order now for 2014

Page 71: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 71

orde r to tra de with the m. Supermarkets in particular are starting to request Recall & Contamination Insurance is included in their supplier’s insurance program.

Contaminated products insur-ance is available to help manage the effects of a recall but impor-tantly also includes the avail-ability of crisis management and public relation consultants 24/7 to assist and advise on any product or potential product contamina-tion issue.

Product Contamination/ Recall InsuranceInsured Events:

• Accidental Contamination – results or has resulted in bodily injury or property damage.

• Adverse Publicity – reporting of an actual or alleged accidental contamination and/or malicious product tampering where the

insured product is specifically named.

• 3rd Party Supplied Impaired Ingredients – intentional and wrongful but not malicious con-taminations or impairments which occur as a result of an ingre-dient supplied by a third party.

• Malicious Product Tamper-ing – malicious alteration of an insured product(s).

• Product Extortion – threat to commit malicious product tampering that is communicated to the insured for the purpose of demanding money, property or services.

• Governmental Recall – an official recall order that has been issued or is imminent by the com-petent authorities in order to com-ply with food safety regulations.

Coverage Includes:• Recall costs• Replacement costs• Rehabilitation expenses

• Business interruption (loss of gross profit)

• Product extortion costs• Consultant and advisory

costs• Third party recall costs• Fines and penalties

Wine Contamination Claims (New Zealand)

• Threat of product tampering; costs of crisis consultants fees and product testing - $244,365.

• Secondary fermentation of wine exported to Australia – costs of testing and recall/replacement of batches $21,237.

• Crystals discovered in 12,231 bottles of 2009 Sav Blanc – costs of testing, recall and replacement $40,146.

• Insured product contami-nated by detergents contained in a filter unit – costs of testing, prod-uct replacement $199,161.

• The above incidents involved:

Engagement of crisis consult-ants

Deployment of overseas claims specialists

Cross-border communication in affected countries

Product recalls now occur more frequently and have become more costly than ever before. Brand and reputation manage-ment has never been more critical.

Companies with both a pre and post incident product recall strat-egy, in combination with adequate insurance protection, are usually in the best position if a recall was to occur.

It is also prudent to highlight that the use of a contract wine maker or bottling company does not act as protection as they will exclude under contract all liability relating to consequential losses or recall costs in the event of a contamination occurring at their premises. ■

Hill Laboratories specialist wine testing laboratories offer you a suite of tests for every stage in wine production from soil and water testing, to planting, harvesting, bottling and exporting. With a resident Oenologist and an alliance with ETS Labs in USA, we have all the tests and expertise you’ll ever need to ensure your wine is the best that it can be.

CO

NTA

CT ENQUIRIES 03 377 7176

OENOLOGIST 03 962 0958

WEB hill-laboratories.com/winelab

www.hill-laboratories.com

SEA

L547

0NZW

a

SOIL • PLANT & LEAF • WATER • JUICE • WINE • MICROBIOLOGY • RAPID DNA • EXPORT • ALLERGENS

FROM ACIDITY TOZYGOSACCHAROMYCES

AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN!

Page 72: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

72 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

REGIONSHAWKE’S BAY

LA DOLCE VITA FOR SCHOLARSHIP WINNER

W inning his year’s New Z e a l a n d B r a g a t o Exchange scholarship will give EIT student

Dan Andrews his first taste of overseas travel.

In the third year of his Bach-elor of Viticulture and Bachelor of Wine Science Concurrent Degree, Dan is eagerly anticipat-ing a month exploring Italy’s wine regions early next year.

As part of the trip, he will visit Scuola Enoligica di Conegliano, Italy’s premier viticultural educa-tor and the alma mater of Romeo Bragato – the viticulturist who, more than a century ago, recog-nised and promoted New Zea-land’s potential as a winegrowing country.

After leaving Auckland Gram-mar, Dan gained his Bachelor of Commerce at the University of Auckland and worked in market-ing for several years. It was losing his mother to cancer that triggered a change of perspective.

Not wanting to continue in a

“behind-the-desk job”, he decided to pursue wine studies and was still weighing up tertiary educators when he met Steve Smith, Mas-ter of Wine and Craggy Range’s director of wine and viticulture, at a wine tasting and dinner hosted by his group of young Auckland professionals.

Pointing to its industry-focused study programmes, Smith encouraged Dan to enrol at EIT and offered him a part-time posi-tion working at Craggy Range’s cellar door.

After commerce, Dan found the science a big challenge, par-ticularly in the first year of his degree studies, but says he ben-efitted from small classes and easy access to lecturers.

“Now I’m involved in more practicals. This year, for example, I worked in the Craggy Range win-ery as part of my studies.”

The 26-year-old feels he’s made the right decision in pursu-ing something he feels passion-ate about. His is aiming for a job that combines working in a vine-yard and a winery. But after he

graduates, his immediate goal is to work vintages in wine regions in the northern and south-ern hemi-spheres.

“After seven y e a r s o f

degree study, it will be time for travel. I’ve got itchy feet and given that I haven’t been overseas, I

really want to do that for a while.” EIT and the Rotary Club of

Greenmeadows are co-sponsors of the Bragato Exchange Scholar-ship. This year’s Italian winner,

Alice Bottarel visited wine regions in New Zealand before attending the Romeo Bragato Conference in Blenheim. ■[email protected]

Dan Andrews is looking forward to a month exploring wine regions in Italy.

M A R Y S H A N A H A N

Tel 03 445 4998www.tomtomdesign.co.nz

Is your brand as good as your wine?

Give your quality wine the label, brand and attention it deserves. For great design of labels, logos and all marketing material call Mark at Tomtom Design now and discuss how to create the right impression.

Page 73: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

CALENDAR

OCTOBER3

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 73

31Hawke’s Bay Winegrowers AGM Hawke’s Bay Opera House, 1st floor, 3pm. RSVP [email protected] by Oct 29.

Six Nations Wine Challenge Presentation and Trophy dinner -Sydney

NOVEMBER1-3Marlborough Wine Weekend

4-7Plant & Food Research Plant Dormancy SymposiumAuckland

1-10Hawke’s Bay Fine Wine and Food ClassicHawke’s Bay. Details www.fawc.co.nz

4-6Air New Zealand Wine Awards judgingAuckland

7-96th Hong Kong International Wine and Spirits FairHong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre

9Marlborough Wine Show Awards dinnerBlenheim

14Wineworks Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc yacht race to Wellington

17Toast Martinborough

23Air New Zealand Wine Awards dinnerQueenstown

28Wine Marlborough AGMMarlborough Research Centre Theatre - time to be confirmed

DECEMBER7Christchurch/South Island Wine and Food FestivalChristchurch

JANUARY/FEBURARYJan 30-Feb 1Central Otago Pinot Noir CelebrationCentral Otago

FEBRUARY830th Anniversary Marlborough Wine and Food Festival

Page 74: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

WHERE EVENT ATTENDANCEW=WineryA=Agent NZW=NZ Winegrowers

AUDIENCEM=Media T=Trade C=Consumer

EVENT DATE2013/2014

UK New Release Trade Testing (London) NZW T, M, C November 5

UK Wine Gang (London) NZW T, M, C November 9

UK Three Winemen (Manchester) NZW T, M, CNovember 23 & 24

UK Three Wine Men (London) NZW T, M, C December 7 & 8

UK Annual Trade and Consumer Tasting (London) W, A, NZW T, M, C January 21

Ireland Annual Trade and Consumer Trading (Dublin) W, A, NZW T, M, C January 23

Japan New Zealand Wine Fair (Tokyo) W, A, NZW T, M, C February 17

Japan New Zealand Wine Fair (Osaka) W, A, NZW T, M, C February 19

Australia RegioNZ By The Glass (Melbourne) W, A, NZW T, M, C February 18

Australia RegioNZ By The Glass (Sydney) W, A, NZW T, M, C February 20

74 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

2029-08 layout_global_P 9/23/08 9:32 AM Page 1

Composite

C M Y CM MY CY CMY K

Page 75: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2013 // 75NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 75

STATISTICS

PRINCIPAL EXPORT MARKETS

MAJOR VARIETIES IN MAJOR AREAS

MAJOR NZ VINEYARD AREAS PRODUCING HECTARES

*n.c. = no change

*(npr = not previously recorded separately)

Exports up againExports for the 11 months to end of May 2013 (Moving Annual Total)

Region (Actual) 2012 2015

(forecast)

% of Total

Marlborough 22,587.3 23.017.7 66%

Hawkes Bay 4,841.4 4,938.5 14%

Otago 1,786.7 1,791.9 5%

Gisborne 1,616.5 1,586.2 5%

Waipara 1,034.5 1,082.2 3%

Wairarapa / Wellington 941.9 943.5 3%

Nelson 962.6 1,015.4 3%

Auckland / Northland 319.77 315.7 1%

Waikato / Bay of Plenty 16.1 10.2 0%

National Total 34,269.5 34,952.8

Variety 2012 % producing

area

2015 % producing

area

Sauvignon Blanc 19,929.8 58.2 20,214.7 57.8

Pinot Noir 5096.4 14.9 5175.1 14.8

Chardonnay 3120.9 9.1 3164.0 9.1

Pinot Gris 2396.2 7.0 2399.7 6.9

Merlot 1195.9 3.5 1245.4 3.6

Riesling 719.0 2.1 746.2 2.1

Syrah 354.1 1.0 400.6 1

Gewurztraminer 331.3 1.0 311.4 0.9

Cabernet Sauv 284.8 0.8 323.7 0.9

Viognier 160.8 0.5 146.5 0.4

Malbec 130.2 0.4 143.9 0.4

Cabernet Franc 111.6 0.3 108.9 0.3

All other varieties 438.7 1.3 572.7 1.6

Total 34,269 34,952.9

PRODUCING AREA IN HECTARES BY SIZE - NUMBER OF VINEYARDS

New Zealand’s total producing vineyard will increase by only 0.5% over

the next 2 years. This table shows the variation for major varieties (in

Ha), with % change and percentage of total in 2012.

Region 0-5 5.01-10 10.01-20 20.01-50 50.01

and over

Aklnd / Nthlnd 60 13 3 0 1

Canterbury 16 6 2 0 1

Gisborne 20 30 25 13 7

Hawkes Bay 75 56 57 32 21

Marlborough 190 291 210 181 100

Nelson 45 37 12 6 3

Otago 80 61 26 15 3

Waikato / BoP 2 1 1 _ _

Waipara 12 16 3 6 4

Wairarapa / Wgtn 61 16 10 8 3

National 561 527 349 261 143

CountryLitres(m)

$ FOBAverage$/L 2013

Average$/L 2012

United Kingdom 48,891 283,023 $4.99

USA 44,457 290,872 $6.54 $6.48

Australia 51,001 379,389 $7.44 $7.25

Canada 7,325 78,813 $10.76 $10.87

Netherlands 4,187 26,987 $6.44 $5.99

Denmark 0.767 5679 $7.40 $6.35

Ireland 1975 14,120 $7.15 $7.38

Japan 1,136 13,289 $11.70 $11.49

Germany 1,613 9799 $6.07 $5.35

China 2,157 26,829 $12.44 $11.21

Hong Kong 1,492 19,198 $12.86 $12.21

Singapore 1,284 16,268 $12.67 $12.49

Finland 0.184 1,603 $8.71 $9.51

Norway 0.209 1,562 $7.45 $6.82

Sweden 1.572 13,136 $8.35 $8.19

Others 5,021 48,415 $9.64 $9.90

Total 173,277,924 1,228,991 $7.09 $6.67

Page 76: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

76 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

A regular feature at the back of each issue of WineGrower to inform industry people about research projects being undertaken for their benefit. Newly approved projects (when available) are briefly summarised in the first section ‘Introducing New Projects’. Longer reports in the section headed ‘Progress Reports’, will describe what has been achieved so far. Scientists in charge of each project have been asked to make these reports reader-friendly rather than to follow the usual format of scientific papers. When completed, each project will be reported in full detail, with references, on the website: http://wine.nzwine.com/members/research/research-reports/

Information and Updates on NZ Winegrowers Research Programmes.

Associate Editors: Dr Simon Hooker, General Manager Research and Innovation

LIST OF PROJECTS

RESEARCH SUPPLEMENT

Quality Wine Styles for Existing and Developing Markets

Literature review of grape and wine anthocyanins and phenolics to give viticulturists and winemakers knowledgeLincoln University (Roland Harrison)

Preliminary investigation of factors responsible for variability in tartaric acid additions to Pinot noirLincoln University (Roland Harrison)

Manipulation of methoxypyrazine (MP) levels in Sauvignon blanc wine through leaf and rachis additionsPlant and Food Research (Claire Grose)

Influence of juice pH on thiol productionPlant and Food Research (Claire Grose)

Identification of natural genetic variation in grapevine contributing to pathogen resistanceLincoln University (Chris Winefield)

Sensory effects of defoliation timing and method on Sauvignon blanc, Chardonnay, Merlot, and Cabernet SauvignonEastern Institute of Technology (EIT) (Mark Krasnow)

Chinese consumers’ preferences and attitudes to wine: Review of literature including Chinese Language PublicationsPlant and Food Research (Roger Harker)

Pests and Disease

Implementation of Virus Elimination Strategy Various (Nick Hoskins – Project Manager) Supported by MPI Sustainable Farming Fund

Review of New Zealand and other related trunk disease informationPlant and Food Research (Dion Mundy)

Botrytis decision support (BDS) industry training & botrytis sampling protocolsPlant and Food Research (Rob Beresford)

Understanding causes of slip skinPlant and Food Research (Rob Beresford)

Sustainability/Organics

Organic Focus Vineyard Project Organic Winegrowers New Zealand (Rebecca Reider) Supported by MPI Sustainable Farming Fund

Effects of undervine vegetation management on grape quality, vine performance, grape composition, and soil propertiesEastern Institute of Technology (EIT) (Mark Krasnow)

Cost Reduction/Increased Profitability

New opportunities for sustainable grape thinning Plant and Food Research (Mike Trought) Supported by MPI Sustainable Farming Fund

Reduced berry size and Botrytis tolerance through trauma to the vinePlant and Food Research (Mike Trought)

Page 77: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 77

PROGRESSREPORTS

Previous research from the Harvest Tech-nologies milestone in the joint Plant & Food Research/New Zealand Winegrowers Grape and Wine Research Programme in 2011 and 2012 has shown that grape harvesting and processing methods can influence flavour and aromas in Sauvignon Blanc wine. The characteristic thiol-related flavours of Sauvignon Blanc wine (tropical, sweaty, pas-sionfruit) are lower in wines made from hand-harvested, whole bunch pressed grapes than in those from machine-harvested grapes. The first part of this New Zealand Winegrower-funded project investigates manipulating wine flavour and aroma using harvest and processing

methods applied to fruit at harvest.The second part of the project investigates

whether thiol content of Sauvignon Blanc wine can be manipulated by varying juice exposure to oxidation during grape harvesting. High and low additions of sulphur and/or ascorbic acid were added to grapes at harvest using commer-cial-scale grape processing.

The project was undertaken in collabora-tion with Saint Clair Family Estate, using two Marlborough vineyard sites. One site with high thiol potential was located in Dillons Point, Lower Wairau, and the second site, potentially low in thiols, was located at Benmorven in the Southern Valleys.

Sensory evaluation of wines at the Marlborough Research Centre

Sensory evaluation of the wines was carried out at the Marlborough Research Centre in December 2012 by our panel of Marlborough wine industry professionals. This showed wines made from the potentially high thiol site exhib-ited more intense thiol-related flavours (pas-sionfruit/sweet sweaty and boxwood/broom) than wines from the potentially low thiol site. The study suggests choice of fruit processing method is a powerful tool for manipulating the sensory properties of wines made from fruit with high thiol potential, while the influence of

The impact of harvest and processing techniques on flavour creation in sauvignon blancGrose C, Martin D, Trought M, Agnew R, Stuart L and Haycock S

The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (PFR), Marlborough Wine Research Centre, Blenheim

11-118

Page 78: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

78 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

fruit processing method on wines made using fruit with low thiol potential is reduced. The hand-harvested, whole bunch pressed treat-ment was found to minimise the thiol potential of the fruit in the resulting wines.

These wines were consistently judged as the least typical of a Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc wine. Overall, findings reveal that har-vest and fruit processing methods used before fermentation affect all sensory aspects includ-ing flavour, taste and mouthfeel properties of

the resulting wines.Results from investigating juice exposure to

oxidation at harvest indicated that high sulphur with no ascorbic acid addition to harvested fruit before pressing limited the expression of thiol potential of the juice in the resulting wines.

The outcome of this study will help to provide wine producers with tools to modify flavour and aroma in Sauvignon blanc wine to achieve desired wine styles.

AcknowledgementsThis project has been funded by New Zea-

land Winegrowers as part of the joint Grape and Wine Research Programme with Plant & Food Research.

We thank Saint Clair Family Estate for pro-viding the vineyard, fruit and juices used in this project, and Marlborough wine industry panellists for their sensory evaluation. Assis-tance of Marlborough Research Centre staff is acknowledged.

Research from the New Zealand Grape and Wine Programme, a joint investment by Plant & Food Research and New Zealand Winegrow-ers, has shown that length of skin contact time and antioxidant addition regimes during grape harvesting and processing can influence the characteristic thiol-related flavours (tropical, sweaty, passionfruit) of Sauvignon Blanc wine.

During fruit processing, as skin contact time is extended, there is an increase in extraction of potassium from the grape skins, with a cor-responding increase in juice pH. Likewise, as pressures and duration of grape pressing increase, juice composition changes as potas-sium concentrations increase and organic acid concentrations decrease.

The net result is higher pH juice from later/

harder press fractions. Juice pH and potas-sium imbalances can affect viable yeast popu-lations, yeast metabolisms and fermentation rates. These yeast metabolisms and fermen-tation rates play a role in volatile thiol pro-duction, but how much influence they have is still unresolved. Further research is required to determine whether thiol production is being modified by a “skin contact/pressing” effect independently of a “juice pH” effect, or whether the influence of pH on yeast metabo-lisms is the more influential factor in volatile thiol production.

The objective of our current project is to determine the influence of changing juice pH on wine volatile thiol production by additions to juice pre fermentation, or by manipulating

skin contact time during grape processing. This research has been made possible by funding from New Zealand Winegrowers.

In a first experiment, juice pH was manipu-lated before fermentation by the addition of varying proportions of a) potassium bicarbo-nate or b) heavy press fractions from a com-mercial press. A second experiment was run in parallel, to assess the effects of varying lengths of skin contact time in association with two different sulphur dioxide addition regimes (50ppm and 80ppm) on juice pH and subse-quent wine composition. Modified juices were fermented under controlled conditions and the wines have been chemically analysed for major constituents, volatile thiols and meth-oxypyrazines.

Influence of juice pH on thiol productionClaire Grose, Damian Martin, Abby Albright, Sharlene Haycock and Lily Stuart

The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited (PFR), Marlborough Wine Research Centre, Blenheim

12-108

Page 79: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 79

Figure 1: The influence of changing juice pH with two additions of sulphur (SO

2) and three

skin contact times on thiol production in the resulting Sauvignon blanc wines.

In experiment 2, the higher sulphur diox-ide (SO2) addition of 80 ppm for all three skin contact times (0, 1 and 3 hours) signifi-cantly decreased thiol concentration in the wine (Figure 1). This is consistent with results from related antioxidant addition experiments within the Grape and Wine Programme.

Potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3)

Figure 2: Effect of potassium bicarbonate additions on Sauvignon blanc wine thiol production.Figure 3: Effect of heavy press fraction addi-tions on Sauvignon Blanc wine thiol produc-tion.

Both potassium bicarbonate (Figure 2) and heavy press fraction additions (Figure 3) increased juice pH and generally decreased thiol production in the wine. These preliminary results require further analysis and investiga-tion.

Outcomes from this research will provide industry with tools to optimise thiol concentra-tions in Sauvignon blanc wine through manipu-lation of juice pH during processing or before fermentation. This will help to reinforce New Zealand’s competitive edge and unique posi-

tion as a world leader in premium Sauvignon blanc wine production.

AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by funding

from New Zealand Winegrowers. The work is part of the New Zealand Grape and Wine Research Programme, a joint investment by Plant & Food Research and NZ Winegrower.

Saint Clair Family Estate for providing the fruit and juices used in this project.

Colleagues at Plant & Food Research.

Slip skin is a symptom of Botrytis cinerea infec-tion of grape berries and shows up as detachment of the grape skin from the pulp of the berry. It is a problem for the New Zealand wine industry because, in just a few days, under certain weather conditions, it can severely affect apparently healthy grapes, making them unusable for wine making.

Given this background, New Zealand Wine-growers initiated and funded a new project and contracted Plant & Food Research (PFR) to investigate the environmental factors that can lead to slip skin development. Plant & Food

Research hypothesised that the disease devel-ops when near-ripe grape berries with latent B. cinerea infection are subjected to wetting. Water dilutes the sugar content of berries, allowing B. cinerea to reactivate and produce enzymes that cause the detachment of the berry skin.

We have been testing this hypothesis on Pinot Noir grapes in vineyards in Auckland, Hawke’s Bay and Marlborough with the aim of developing practical experimental methods for studying slip skin in the vineyard environment. To emulate wet weather conditions suitable for slip skin development we either covered

bunches attached to the vine with plastic bags for several days or soaked detached bunches in the laboratory and then incubated them for several days. These methods were applied to near-ripe grapes (>20oBrix). To manipulate latent B. cinerea infections in grape bunches, the fungicide Switch® was applied to some treat-ments at pre-bunch closure (PBC) to control existing latent infections and some treatments were deliberately inoculated at véraison with B. cinerea to establish new latent infections in a controlled way. These trials successfully determined that substantial wetting, akin to

Understanding causes of slip skin Rob Beresford, Dion Mundy, Peter Wood and Monica Holland

Plant & Food Research, Auckland, Marlborough and Hawke’s Bay

11-119

Page 80: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

80 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

rainfall, is required before for slip skin will develop. Soaking produced slip skin symp-toms, but incubation in plastic bags did not. In the field, we believe a substantial period of rainfall or heavy irrigation would be required to provide sufficient wetting. We also showed that latent B. cinereainfection is required before slip skin will develop. Either an application of a fungicide known to control latent infections at PBC or lack of B. cinerea inoculation at véraison substantially reduced the incidence of slip skin.

Our conclusions from these trials are that slip skin develops when grape berries with latent B. cinerea infection take up water rapidly. Slip skin and normal botrytis bunch rot are related because both result from B. cinerea infection of grape berries. The expression of latent B. cinerea infection as slip skin depends on substantial

and rapid water uptake to dilute the berry sugar content, allowing B. cinerea to reactivate. On the other hand, while normal bunch rot also requires moist conditions, it does not develop as suddenly as slip skin. This explains why slip skin only develops in the field under certain wet weather conditions. In our experimental system we successfully manipulated amounts of both slip skin and botrytis bunch rot that developed during late ripening by fungicide application at pre-bunch closure and by inoculation with B. cinerea at veraison. The potential amount of crop loss in a vineyard from either slip skin or botrytis bunch rot both depend on the amount of latent B. cinerea infection that is present. Which of the two manifestations ofB. cinerea infection will be expressed depends on whether or not a substantial amount of water becomes

available in the vineyard at a critical time dur-ing ripening.

Further research on slip skin could use laboratory experiments to investigate how the high osmotic potential of ripe grape berries inhibits B. cinerea growth and how this inhi-bition is released when sufficient moisture becomes available during wetting. Vineyard experiments using ripe grape bunches could measure changes in solute concentration with water uptake and compare this with the osmotic relations of B. cinerea determined in the labo-ratory experiments. In addition, the vineyard experimental system used in this study could be implemented to define rainfall requirements for slip skin expression and evaluate control treatments, by using B. cinerea inoculation and sprinkler irrigation at various times.

A Pinot Noir grape bunch with slip skin symptoms that were induced by soaking in water, showing Botrytis cinerea growing out from some of the berries after several days of incubation.

Page 81: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013 // 81

The web-based Botrytis Decision Support (BDS) system has been developed over the last 10 years by Plant & Food Research and HortPlus™, with funding from NZW and The Ministry for Busi-ness, Innovation and Employment (previously FRST). The models employed within the BDS system have been field-tested in New Zealand, as well as in Australia, under funding from the Australian Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation and the University of Tasmania. The BDS system uses weather and vineyard information to assess the seasonal risk of bot-rytis bunch rot (botrytis) so that vineyard man-agers and winery operators can optimise the effectiveness of their decisions about botrytis management. The BDS website is user security-protected and contains vineyard block informa-tion, as well as the separate early-season and late-season botrytis risk models. It also contains a help facility with a user manual and links to other information.

The first version of this BDS model was a Microsoft® Excel® spreadsheet developed dur-ing 2008-9. This was field-tested the following year and then programmed as a web-based tool for the New Zealand wine industry in 2010-11 by HortPlus™. Our recent activities for the advanced implementation of this BDS system had three objectives:

Industry consultation: To determine the industry’s needs and to gain widespread uptake of the web-based BDS by carrying out one-on-one interviews with key wine company and horticultural consultant users and identifying model refinements according to their recom-mendations.

Botrytis assessment protocols: To develop rapid vineyard sampling protocols for low-cost botrytis data collection based on incidence-severity relationships and to test this protocol in commercial vineyards.

Model refinement, and a marketing and training programme:

Botrytis Decision Support (BDS) user groups were formed in November 2011, com-

prising representatives of five wine companies in Marlborough, four in Hawke’s Bay, and one Hawke’s Bay horticultural consultancy. Discus-sion and training sessions were held between flowering and bunch closure (December 2011 to January 2012) for the early-season BDS model and during grape ripening (March 2012 to April 2012) for the late-season BDS model. We wanted to know:

How much understanding the groups had about the principles of botrytis epidemiology and use of the BDS models.

How well the BDS models fitted the needs of users.

Improvements that could be made to the models and the website.

The groups’ suggested improvements to the models and website, which were implemented by Plant & Food Research and HortPlus dur-ing the 2012-13 season, were:

The inclusion of on-screen “tool tips” to assist user navigation in the website and more “Help” information, including an updated User Manual and links to online BDS training mate-rial.

The inclusion of botrytis risk information from the early-season model into the Marl-borough Vinefacts service during the 2012-13 season.

A review of the effects of botrytis manage-ment actions on the early-season model bot-rytis risk calculation.

Inclusion of bunch trash removal as a can-opy management action in the early-season model.

Inclusion of pre-harvest rainfall as a risk input in the late-season BDS model.

A link added to the Bunch Rot Assessment Trainer (BRAT) software.

Rapid methods of botrytis severity estima-tion to improve the use of the late-season BDS model. A “Severity from Incidence Calculator” has been programmed into the late-season BDS model by HortPlus.

To elaborate on this last point, which was our second objective, further:

Feedback from late-season BDS model users indicated that model uptake would be limited unless the cost of collecting botrytis sever-ity data during early grape ripening could be reduced. Vineyard managers would not nor-mally spend money on full botrytis severity assessments until close to harvest, when the impact of botrytis on the harvested crop must be assessed for winery operations.

This feedback highlighted a shortfall in understanding that exists between current wine industry practice and the way forward to improve both understanding of botrytis epi-demiology and botrytis management through effective use of the late-season BDS model. The vineyard studies from which the late-season model was developed showed that, in most situations, the earlier botrytis appears in a vine-yard, the worse the crop damage is at harvest. Accurate vineyard monitoring during early ripening through use of the late-season BDS model would allow more effective prediction and management of botrytis risks.

To encourage use of the late-season BDS model, we sought to develop rapid botrytis severity estimation by investigating incidence-severity (I-S) relationships. Botrytis incidence is the percentage of bunches in a sample on which some botrytis is present. Severity is the percentage of the bunch affected by botrytis. The mean severity of a sample (also called crop loss) is used by the wine industry to determine the impact of botrytis on the grape crop and is the input required by the late-season BDS model.

We first looked at I-S relationships using 26 datasets collected in a single national study in six New Zealand regions using 10 grape varie-ties during the 2011-12 season.

These preliminary I-S relationships were then compared with 82 independent valida-tion datasets collected in three regions over 15 years to explore the influences of region, variety, botrytis management actions and crop maturity on the I-S relationship.

Final I-S relationships, reflecting varietal

Botrytis decision support (BDS) training and botrytis sampling protocols

Project leader: Dr Rob Beresford

11-120

Page 82: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

82 // NZ WINEGROWER OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2013

differences, were defined for improvement of the late-season BDS model.

Figure 1: The late-season botrytis risk model within the Botrytis Decision Support system contains a tool that estimates mean botrytis severity (crop loss) within a vineyard block when the user enters the botrytis inci-dence, which is the percentage of bunches with some bot-rytis present, determined by inspection of 400 bunches.

This study highlighted the practical implications of assessor bias in botrytis severity estimation. Variability between experienced assessors produced differences in severity estimates that were large enough to result in mis-interpretation of the impact of botrytis on a grape crop. This indicates that there are shortcomings in current industry practices. These need to be addressed through greater industry standardisation and training.

Because severity assessment is more likely to be affected by assessor bias than incidence assessment, use of the severity from incidence calculator in the late-season BDS model is likely to reduce bias in severity esti-mation, even though there is error resulting from the imperfect nature of the I-S relationship. Further research on I-S relationships should focus on characterising and accounting for error in these.

Sacred Hill, Hawke’s Bay, supplied by NZW.

Page 83: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

Mealybugs! You can run but you can’t hide.

Even the most stubborn and persistent Mealybugs have no escape from the unique action of Movento. Movento’s 2-way systemic control spreads throughout the entire plant hunting down pests in the most difficult to reach places ensuring your grape crops are free from this potentially devastating pest.

Ask for Movento by Bayer CropScience. Contact your nearest field representative for more information or call toll free: 0800 33 44 60.

BA

C10

32

Movento 100SC® is registered pursuant to the AVCM Act 1997, No P8434 and to the HSNO Act 1996, No HSR100545. Movento 100SC® is a registered trademark of the Bayer Group. ®Priority Partnership is a registered trademark of Nufarm Ltd. ©Bayer CropScience 2013.

www.cropscience.bayer.co.nz

BAC 1032 Movento 2013 - Press NZWinegrower_297x210_ƒ.indd 1 7/19/13 5:17 PM

O-I NZ created New ZealaNd’s fIrst glass recyclINg prOgram IN 1973, pre-datINg legIslatION by mOre thaN 30 years. we kNOw sustaINabIlIty Is ImpOrtaNt tO the New ZealaNd wINe INdustry aNd we share that gOal.

O - I N E W Z E A L A N D TE L : 0800 263 390 , +64 9 976 7100 EMA I L : s a l e s . n z@ap .o - i . com

www.o - i . com www.g l a s s i s l i f e . com www. f acebook . com/G la s s I s L i f e

O-I NZ has dIVerted OVer 1.6 mIllION tONNesOf glass frOm laNdfIll

61706 NZ Winegrowers Ad PRESS.indd 1 24/09/13 4:31 PM

Page 84: NZWinegrower Oct/Nov 2013

OC

TO

BE

R / NOVEMBER

20

13

QUA K E L E S S ON S ✽ H IG H E N D C H A R D ON N AY ✽ WAT E R B AT T L E ✽ BIO S E C U R I T Y T H R E AT S

TH

E O

FF

ICIA

L J

OU

RN

AL

OF

NE

W Z

EA

LA

ND

WIN

EG

RO

WE

RS

ISS

UE

82

OC

TO

BE

R / N

OV

EM

BE

R 2

013

NE

W Z

EA

LA

ND

WIN

EG

RO

WE

R

ISSUE

82