objectives

1
Objectives Develop K d values for flumioxazin on seven soils commonly found in the peanut growing regions of the South. Describe adsorption kinetics. Describe desorption of flumioxazin. Introduction Flumioxazin (Valor 51WP) has been labeled for soybean and peanut since 2001. Flumioxazin has been most commonly used in the peanut growing regions of the South. No adsorption data currently exist for flumioxazin in the EPA package or in technical data recources Flumioxazin is non-ionic with a H 2 O solubility 1.79 mg/L at 25C. Materials and Methods Batch Equlibrium 2 g soil. 10 ml 0.01M CaCl 2 . 0, 10, 20, 40, 60 µM flumioxazin. Shaking time – 24h. Analysis of adsorption by LCS. Adsorption Kinetics Greenville sandy clay loam. Samples removed 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72h. Adsorption quantified by LCS. Desorption Initial sorption time – 24h. Replaced with herbicide free 0.01M CaCl . Future Research •Determine the relative leaching potential of flumioxazin. •Determine the duration of flumioxazin persistence in soil. •Determine transformation products of flumioxazin by soil microflora. *The authors thank Valent USA for supplying 14 C- flumioxazin. State Series % OC % sand % silt % clay Kentucky Lanton loam 5.3 36 38 26 Texas D uvalsandy loam 0.8 78 10 12 Texas Brownfield sand 0.2 90 2 8 Georgia Greenville sandy clay loam 2.6 58 10 32 Georgia Dothan sandy loam 0.9 85 12 3 Georgia Cecilsandy loam 2.6 62 20 18 Georgia Tifton loam y sand 1.6 94 4 2 Flum ioxazin Adsorption K inetics 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 20 40 60 80 H ours % adsorbed Flum ioxazin D esorption 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 C (µm ol L -1 ) S (µm ol g -1 ) adsorption desorption Results Adsorption •Sorption isotherms were linear. •Flumioxazin is not tightly bound to soil (K d values 2.4-0.9). With many K d ’s near 1.0, flumioxazin has near equal affinity for sorbed or solution phase. •OM content was not correlated to flumioxazin sorption. Adsorption Kinetics •72% of flumioxazin was bound to soil within 1h; sorption was near instantaneous. •After 72h, sorption was increased to 78%. Desorption •Desorption rates were similar to adsorption; thus, equlibrium is soil solution will be reached quickly. •Rapid desorption could lead to flumioxazin availability during a rainfall event, thus making it susceptible to leaching. Series Kd r 2 Kd correlations Lanton 2.1 0.98 Prob. Duval 1.3 0.99 Sand 0.03 Brownfield 0.9 0.99 Silt 0.07 Greenville 2.4 0.99 Clay 0.03 Dothan 1.4 0.99 pH 0.67 Cecil 1.4 0.98 CEC 0.23 Tifton 1.3 0.99 OM 0.17

Upload: donnel

Post on 06-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Series Kd r 2 Kd correlations Lanton2.10.98 Prob. Duval1.30.99Sand0.03 Brownfield0.90.99Silt0.07 Greenville2.40.99Clay0.03 Dothan1.40.99pH0.67 Cecil1.40.98CEC0.23 Tifton1.30.99OM0.17. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Objectives

Objectives• Develop Kd values for flumioxazin on seven

soils commonly found in the peanut growing regions of the South.

• Describe adsorption kinetics.

• Describe desorption of flumioxazin.

Objectives• Develop Kd values for flumioxazin on seven

soils commonly found in the peanut growing regions of the South.

• Describe adsorption kinetics.

• Describe desorption of flumioxazin.

Introduction• Flumioxazin (Valor 51WP) has been labeled

for soybean and peanut since 2001.

• Flumioxazin has been most commonly used in the peanut growing regions of the South.

• No adsorption data currently exist for flumioxazin in the EPA package or in technical data recources

• Flumioxazin is non-ionic with a H2O solubility 1.79 mg/L at 25C.

Introduction• Flumioxazin (Valor 51WP) has been labeled

for soybean and peanut since 2001.

• Flumioxazin has been most commonly used in the peanut growing regions of the South.

• No adsorption data currently exist for flumioxazin in the EPA package or in technical data recources

• Flumioxazin is non-ionic with a H2O solubility 1.79 mg/L at 25C.

Materials and Methods

Batch Equlibrium• 2 g soil.• 10 ml 0.01M CaCl2.• 0, 10, 20, 40, 60 µM flumioxazin.• Shaking time – 24h.• Analysis of adsorption by LCS.

Adsorption Kinetics• Greenville sandy clay loam.• Samples removed 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72h.• Adsorption quantified by LCS.

Desorption

• Initial sorption time – 24h.

• Replaced with herbicide free 0.01M CaCl2.

• Desorbed for 24, 48, 72, 96h.

Materials and Methods

Batch Equlibrium• 2 g soil.• 10 ml 0.01M CaCl2.• 0, 10, 20, 40, 60 µM flumioxazin.• Shaking time – 24h.• Analysis of adsorption by LCS.

Adsorption Kinetics• Greenville sandy clay loam.• Samples removed 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72h.• Adsorption quantified by LCS.

Desorption

• Initial sorption time – 24h.

• Replaced with herbicide free 0.01M CaCl2.

• Desorbed for 24, 48, 72, 96h.

Yield

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1 2 3 4 5 6 LSD

Treatment

Lin

t w

eigh

t (k

g/ha

)

1996-1997 1998

Yield

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1 2 3 4 5 6 LSD

Treatment

Lin

t w

eigh

t (k

g/ha

)

1996-1997 1998

Ivyleaf Morningglory Control

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 2 3 4 5 6 LSD

Treatment

Per

cen

t C

ontr

ol (

%)

1996-1997 1998

Ivyleaf Morningglory Control

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 2 3 4 5 6 LSD

Treatment

Per

cen

t C

ontr

ol (

%)

1996-1997 1998

Future Research

•Determine the relative leaching potential of flumioxazin.

•Determine the duration of flumioxazin persistence in soil.

•Determine transformation products of flumioxazin by soil microflora.

*The authors thank Valent USA for supplying 14C-flumioxazin.

Future Research

•Determine the relative leaching potential of flumioxazin.

•Determine the duration of flumioxazin persistence in soil.

•Determine transformation products of flumioxazin by soil microflora.

*The authors thank Valent USA for supplying 14C-flumioxazin.

State Series % OC % sand % silt % clay

Kentucky Lanton loam 5.3 36 38 26

Texas Duval sandy loam 0.8 78 10 12

Texas Brownfield sand 0.2 90 2 8

Georgia Greenville sandy clay loam

2.6 58 10 32

Georgia Dothan sandy loam

0.9 85 12 3

Georgia Cecil sandy loam 2.6 62 20 18

Georgia Tifton loamy sand 1.6 94 4 2

Flumioxazin Adsorption Kinetics

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

0 20 40 60 80

Hours

% a

dso

rbe

d

Flumioxazin Desorption

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

C (µmol L-1)

S (

µm

ol g

-1)

adsorption

desorption

Results

Adsorption

•Sorption isotherms were linear.

•Flumioxazin is not tightly bound to soil (Kd values 2.4-0.9).

•With many Kd’s near 1.0, flumioxazin has near equal affinity for sorbed or solution phase.

•OM content was not correlated to flumioxazin sorption.

Adsorption Kinetics

•72% of flumioxazin was bound to soil within 1h; sorption was near instantaneous.

•After 72h, sorption was increased to 78%.

Desorption

•Desorption rates were similar to adsorption; thus, equlibrium is soil solution will be reached quickly.

•Rapid desorption could lead to flumioxazin availability during a rainfall event, thus making it susceptible to leaching.

Results

Adsorption

•Sorption isotherms were linear.

•Flumioxazin is not tightly bound to soil (Kd values 2.4-0.9).

•With many Kd’s near 1.0, flumioxazin has near equal affinity for sorbed or solution phase.

•OM content was not correlated to flumioxazin sorption.

Adsorption Kinetics

•72% of flumioxazin was bound to soil within 1h; sorption was near instantaneous.

•After 72h, sorption was increased to 78%.

Desorption

•Desorption rates were similar to adsorption; thus, equlibrium is soil solution will be reached quickly.

•Rapid desorption could lead to flumioxazin availability during a rainfall event, thus making it susceptible to leaching.

Series Kd r2 Kd correlations

Lanton 2.1 0.98 Prob.

Duval 1.3 0.99 Sand 0.03

Brownfield 0.9 0.99 Silt 0.07

Greenville 2.4 0.99 Clay 0.03

Dothan 1.4 0.99 pH 0.67

Cecil 1.4 0.98 CEC 0.23

Tifton 1.3 0.99 OM 0.17

Series Kd r2 Kd correlations

Lanton 2.1 0.98 Prob.

Duval 1.3 0.99 Sand 0.03

Brownfield 0.9 0.99 Silt 0.07

Greenville 2.4 0.99 Clay 0.03

Dothan 1.4 0.99 pH 0.67

Cecil 1.4 0.98 CEC 0.23

Tifton 1.3 0.99 OM 0.17