objectives © pearson education, 2005 monopolistic competition lubs1940: topic 6

22
© Pearson Education, 2005 Objectives Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

Post on 22-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Objectives

Monopolistic Competition

LUBS1940: Topic 6

Page 2: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Objectives

After studying this topic, you will able to: Define and identify monopolistic competition

Explain how output and price are determined in a monopolistically competitive industry

Explain why advertising and branding costs are high in a monopolistic competition

Page 3: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Fliers and Brand Names

Every week, newspapers across Europe are stuffed with supermarket fliers.

How do supermarkets compete? How do brand names change the competitive landscape?

These firms are neither price takers like those in perfect competition nor are they protected from competition by barriers to entry like a monopoly.

How do such firms choose the quantity to produce and price to charge?

Page 4: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

What is Monopolistic Competition?

Monopolistic competition is a market structure in which:(1) Large Number of FirmsThe presence of a large number of firms has three implications: Small Market ShareEach firm supplies only a small market share part of the total market and so has limited market power to influence the price of its product.Ignore Other FirmsEach firm is sensitive to the average market price, but no firm pays attention to the actions of the other and so no one firm’s actions directly affect the actions of other firms.Collusion ImpossibleBecause there are so many firms, collusion to fix prices is impossible.

Page 5: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

What is Monopolistic Competition?

(2) Product Differentiation

Firms in monopolistic competition practice product differentiation.

Product differentiation means that each firm makes a product that is slightly different from the products of competing firms.

A differentiated product is a close substitute but not a perfect substitute.

Page 6: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

What is Monopolistic Competition?

(3) Competing on Quality, Price, Marketing and Branding

Product differentiation enables firms to compete in four area:

Quality: Product design, reliability, and service.

Price: Because firms produce differentiated products, each firm has a downward-sloping demand curve for its own product. So, like monopoly, each firm can set its price and output.

But there is a tradeoff between price and quality.

Marketing and Branding

Differentiated products must be marketed using advertising and packaging.

Branding is the main way firms seek to establish quality differences.

Page 7: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

What is Monopolistic Competition?

(4) Entry and Exit

There are no barriers to entry in monopolistic competition, so firms cannot earn an economic profit in the long run.

Examples of Monopolistic Competition

Some examples of monopolistic competition are audio and video equipment, computers, frozen foods, canned foods, book printing, clothing and dry cleaning.

Page 8: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Output and Price in Monopolistic Competition

The Firm’s Short-run Output and Price Decision

A firm that has decided the quality of its product and its marketing program produces the profit-maximizing quantity at which its marginal revenue equals its marginal cost (MR = MC).

Price is determined from the demand curve for the firm’s product and is the highest price the firm can charge for the profit-maximizing quantity.

Page 9: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Output and Price in Monopolistic Competition

The firm produces the quantity at which price equals marginal cost and sells that quantity for the highest possible price.

It earns an economic profit (as in this example) when P > ATC.

Page 10: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Output and Price in Monopolistic Competition

Long Run: Zero Economic Profit

In the long run, economic profit induces entry.

Entry continues as long as firms in the industry make an economic profit as long as (P > ATC).

In the long run, a firm in monopolistic competition maximizes its profit by producing the quantity at which its marginal revenue equals its marginal cost, MR = MC.

Page 11: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Output and Price in Monopolistic Competition

Figure 13.3 shows a firm in monopolistic competition in long-run equilibrium.

If in the short run firms incur an economic loss, some firms will exit until long-run equilibrium is restored.

Page 12: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Output and Price in Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic Competition and Perfect CompetitionTwo key differences between monopolistic competition and perfect competition are:

Excess capacity Mark up

A firm has excess capacity if it produces less than the quantity at which ATC is a minimum.

A firm’s mark up is the amount by which its price exceeds its marginal cost.

Page 13: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Output and Price in Monopolistic Competition

Firms in monopolistic competition operate with excess capacity in long-run equilibrium.

The downward-sloping demand curve for their products drives this result.

Firms in monopolistic competition operate with positive mark up.

Again, the downward-sloping demand curve for their products drives this result.

Page 14: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Output and Price in Monopolistic Competition

Is Monopolistic Competition Efficient?

Because in monopolistic competition P > MC, marginal benefit exceeds marginal cost and monopolistic competition seems to be inefficient.

But the mark up of price above marginal cost arises from product differentiation.

People value variety, but variety is costly.

Monopolistic competition brings the profitable and possibly efficient amount of variety to market.

Page 15: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Product Development and Marketing

Innovation and Product Development

We’ve looked at a firm’s profit-maximizing output decision in the short run and the long run of a given product and with given marketing effort.

To keep making an economic profit, a firm in monopolistic competition must be in a state of continuous product development.

New product development allows a firm to gain a competitive edge, if only temporarily, before competitors imitate the innovation.

Page 16: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Product Development and Marketing

Advertising ExpendituresFirms in monopolistic competition incur heavy advertising expenditures.

Figure 13.5 shows UK advertising expenditures for a range of industries in 2000.

Page 17: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Product Development and Marketing

Selling Costs and Total Costs

Selling costs, like advertising expenditures, fancy retail buildings etc. are fixed costs.

Average fixed costs decrease as production increases, so selling costs increase average total costs at any given level of output but do not affect the marginal cost of production.

Selling efforts such as advertising are successful if they increase the demand for the firm’s product.

Page 18: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Product Development and Marketing

Advertising costs might lower the average total cost by increasing equilibrium quantity and spreading their fixed costs over the larger quantity produced.

Here, with no advertising, the firm produces 25 jackets at an average total cost of £60 a jacket.

Page 19: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Product Development and Marketing

With advertising, the firm produces 100 jackets at an average total cost of £40 a jacket.

The advertising expenditure shifts the average total cost curve upward, but the firm produces a larger quantity and at a lower ATC than it would without advertising.

Page 20: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Product Development and Marketing

Selling Costs and Demand

Advertising might also decrease the mark up.

In Figure 13.7(a), with no advertising, demand is not very elastic and the mark up is large.

In Figure 13.7(b), advertising makes demand more elastic, increases the quantity and lowers the price and mark up.

Page 21: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Product Development and Marketing

Using Advertising to Signal Quality

Why does Gillette spend huge amounts of money every month advertising shavers that everyone knows?

One answer is that Gillette uses advertising to signal the high quality of its shavers.

A signal is an action taken by an informed person or firm to send a message to uninformed persons.

Page 22: Objectives © Pearson Education, 2005 Monopolistic Competition LUBS1940: Topic 6

© Pearson Education, 2005

Product Development and Marketing

Brand Names

Why do firms spend millions of pounds to establish a brand name or image?

Again, the answer is to provide information about quality and consistency.

You’re more likely to overnight at a Sheraton than at Joe’s Shack because Sheraton has incurred the cost of establishing a brand name and you know what to expect if you stay there.