October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency Hearing Motion, et al. With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COWETA COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

John Harold Murphy, Plaintiff

vs. Civil Action No. 12V-413 Nancy Michelle Murphy, Defendant

October 11, 2014 Amendment to October 6, 2014 and Oct 7 Motions Seeking Emergency Relief

John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud can hardly go a week without some of their irrational, probably alcoholic induced, behavior that the Custody Evaluator obviously failed to identify and the Guardian ad Litem obviously concealed. This weeks litigation based eruption is headed as follows.

Page 2 of 7 October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency Hearing Motion, et al. With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

1. John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud attempt to Intimidate Michelle Murphy by abusing Jack Murphy, age 15 and Thomas Murphy, age 13. They could have no love for these children -- just compare the lives that the children had before the May 27, 2014 Temper Tantrum Violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct and the lives that Jack and Thomas now have. 1.1 Just as a Trojan Horse computer virus inflicts continuing detriment to computers, Judge Baldwins August 23, 2013 ex parte obtained Order and his Order relating to the May 27, 2014 hearing continue to inflict very devastating

Page 3 of 7 October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency Hearing Motion, et al. With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

Code of Judicial Conduct and constitutional violations. 1.1.1 John Harold Murphy, with the financial resources of Renee L. Haugerud has multiplied the injuries inflicted by Judge Baldwin upon this family of Michelle Murphy, Jack Murphy and Thomas Murphy, who did not have the financial resources to fulfill the requirement of Judge Baldwin for this family to continue to pay for the broomstick of the Wicked Witch of the West that he habitually ordered the family to fetch. 1.1.2 To protect the rights of Michelle Murphy, Jack Murphy and Thomas Murphy, a lawyer must now participate in litigation in Georgia, Utah and St. Thomas, USVI without a penny of financial resources to compete with these multimillionaire hedge fund gamblers. 1.1.3 This litigation is enriching the Glover & Davis lawyers who pad the financial and political pockets of Judge Baldwin and hand picked him for the very detrimental suffering that he has inflicted upon this family. 1.1.4 Michelle Murphy amends her October 6, 2014 and October 7, 2014 Emergency Motions to provide the Court with information unavailable to Michelle Murphy and her counsel when the October 6, 2014 and October 7, 2014 Motions were filed. 1.2 Jack and Thomas are apparently still in Utah at a lockdown residential treatment center with a history of abusive treatment toward its teenage captives, and Judge Baldwin has yet to set a hearing and require their attendance. 1.3 John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud, apparently still with money derived or originating from Renee L. Haugerud and her hedge funds, have now employed Virgin Island lawyers in St. Thomas, USVI in an attempt to seal the abusive treatment of Jack and Thomas.

Page 4 of 7 October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency Hearing Motion, et al. With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

1.4 It is relevant to note that on page 2 of the proposed order that the order now seeks to include not just contact as included in the Glover & Davis prepared Order that Judge Baldwin signed, but calling, and communicating in addition to the previous requirement of no contact. 1.5 Michelle Murphy has had no contact with the children since May 27, 2014, as she has only communicated with the children by voice and text messages. 1.6 It does not take a Ph.D. in psychology to detect the strategy of the guardian ad litem, Elizabeth Lisa Harwell, in attempting to secret the consequences of Judge Baldwins violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and violations of constitutional protections inflicted upon this family by providing an opinion that it would not be in the best interest of the children to come to Georgia and testify about the contributing to the delinquency criminal conduct of John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud that Trevor Bishop disclosed. See Attachment 143. 1.7 Using the bad faith communication of Lisa Harwell (Attachment 144) Judge Baldwin denied a hearing on the July 31st Emergency motion. 1.8 John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud subject Jack and Thomas to incarceration at Elevations RTC, a/k/a Island View RTC, to so intimidate these children as to inhibit them from informing the Court about their treatment since May 27, 2014, as John Harold Murphy will threaten them that if they inform anyone of his and Renee L. Haugeruds wrongdoings, he will send them back to Utah. It is easy to reach this conclusion, as he earlier threatened to send them away if they continued to state that they wanted to live with their mother. After the photograph surfaced of Jack and Thomas holding a written plea to be returned to their mother, they were whisked away to the lock-down facility in Utah.

Page 5 of 7 October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency Hearing Motion, et al. With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

2. Judge Baldwins imprudent removal of the following Prohibition of Removing the Children from the Jurisdiction provision of the Standing Order of the Superior Court of Coweta County created both the St. Thomas litigation and the Elevations RTC confinement in Utah issues. 2.1 Judge Baldwin removed the Standing Order requirement of not removing the children from the jurisdiction of the court, executed by all of the judges of the Coweta Judicial Circuit, without the consent of the other judges, while motions to disqualify Judge Baldwin were pending for reasons that Judge Baldwin was violating the Code of Judicial Conduct, the Uniform Superior Court Rules the laws of Georgia and the due process protections of Michelle Murphy, Jack Murphy and Thomas Murphy.

2.2 The documents filed by counsel for John Harold Murphy in St. Thomas are included and incorporated here as Attachment 142. The Temporary Custody Order Must be Overturned Immediately to address the St. Thomas Litigation that Michelle Murphy cannot afford and to obtain release of Jack and Thomas from the Elevations RTC, formerly branded as Island View RTC

Page 6 of 7 October 11, 2014 Amendment to Emergency Hearing Motion, et al. With Plea to Jurisdiction, etc.

2.3 Island View Residential Treatment Center is a residential treatment facility in Utah that changed its name to Elevations RTC when it came under new ownership in May, 2014. Its logo and current branding follow.

2.4 Jack and Thomas are illegally institutionalized in Utah. 2.5 Michelle Murphy received communications from the classmates at the school in St. Thomas who knew Jack Murphy and Thomas Murphy. 2.6 These communications inform the world that Jack and Thomas did not need to be institutionalized and that the contribution to the delinquency of these minors was a ploy of John and Renee to use the institutionalization of Jack and Thomas in Utah to silence their voices and punish them for wanting expressing their fervent desire to return to their home, church and schools in Newnan, Georgia. The lock-down facility in Utah is now their home. 2.7 It is not Jack and Thomas who need institutionalizing, but, as one of their classmates in St. Thomas wrote, it is John Harold Murphy and Renee L. Haugerud who need treatment for their illness. 2.8 The Court should talk to these children and learn about the scam of the Taylor Drake/Glover & Davis lawyers and these hedge fund operators.

Attachment 142, Page 1 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 2 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 3 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 4 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 5 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 6 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 7 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 8 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 9 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 10 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 11 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 12 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 13 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 14 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 15 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 16 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 17 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 18 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 19 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 20 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 21 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 22 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 23 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 24 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 25 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 26 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 27 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 28 of 61

A t t a c h m e n t 1 4 2 , P a g e 2 9 o f 6 1

Attachment 142, Page 30 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 31 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 32 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 33 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 34 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 35 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 36 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 37 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 38 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 39 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 40 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 41 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 42 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 43 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 44 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 45 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 46 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 47 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 48 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 49 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 50 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 51 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 52 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 53 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 54 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 55 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 56 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 57 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 58 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 59 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 60 of 61

Attachment 142, Page 61 of 61

Attachment 143, Page 1 of 1

1Millard FarmerFrom: Elizabeth Harwell Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 6:04 PMTo: Melissa Sams; Millard Farmer; Taylor DrakeSubject: RE: Murphy

Importance: High

ReasoningfornotrecommendingThomasandJackbeinGeorgiaforhearing:

I. TheDefendant,Mrs.Murphy,hasnotyetsubmittedtotheRule35examinationwithDr.Kingandisprohibitedfromhavingcontactwiththechildrenuntilthishasbeenaccomplishedandresultsprovided.ThereisreasontobelievethatMrs.MichelleMurphyhasviolatedthisnocontactportionofJudgeBaldwinsMay27thOrdersignificantlyoverthesummer.ItwouldbeevenmoredifficulttoenforcethisportionoftheOrderifthechildrenreturnedtoGeorgiaforthehearing.

II. ArrangementscouldbemadeforthechildrentocommunicatewiththeCourtviaSkype,FaceTimeortelephonically.

III. Thechildrenareenrolledinabasketballcampforthisweekwhichbegantoday.

IV. Althoughotherresultscouldoccur,theCourthasthreeprimaryrulingswhichcouldbemadeattheconclusionofthehearingonWednesday:a)TemporaryCustodycouldremainwiththePlaintiff,JohnMurphy;b)TemporaryCustodycouldbeawardedtotheDefendant,MichelleMurphy;orc)TemporaryCustodycouldbeplacedwithathirdpartyorentityBasedontheturmoilthatoccurredafterthisCourtsrulingonMay27,2014,shouldtheCourtchooseanyoptionotherthanII.b)abovethepossibilityofsimilar,ifnotgreater,turmoilislikelyandexposuretothatisdefinitelynotinanychildsbestinterest.ShouldtheCourtchooseII.b)itisanticipatedthatarrangementsfortheboystobereturnedtoGeorgiawouldoccurexpeditiouslyandwithoutincident.ElizabethHarwell

From: Melissa Sams [mailto:msams@troupco.org] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 2:51 PM To: Elizabeth Harwell; Millard Farmer; Taylor Drake Subject: RE: Murphy Ms.Harwell,JudgeBaldwinwouldliketoyoutogivehimyourreasoningforwhyitisinthebestinterestsofthechildrennottobepresent.Also,wedidfindacourtreporterforthehearingonWednesday.Thankyou,MelissaSamsFrom: Elizabeth Harwell [mailto:eharwell@hbhlawyer.com] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:37 AM

Attachment 144, Page 1 of 2

2To: Melissa Sams; Millard Farmer; Taylor Drake Subject: Murphy Elizabeth F. Harwell eharwell@hbhlawyer.com Harwell, Brown & Harwell, P.C. 12 Jackson St., Newnan GA 30263 Tel: 770.251.0800 Alternate Tel: 770.251.0868 Facsimile: 770.251.8300 IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication, including any attached files was sent by or on behalf of the firm and may contain material that is proprietary, privileged, confidential, or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. This Communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering this Communication to the intended recipient, you are prohibited from retaining, using, disseminating, forwarding, printing, or copying this Communication. If you have received this Communication in error, please immediately notify the sender via return e-mail or telephone.

Attachment 144, Page 2 of 2