oecd workshop on measuring the link between public procurement, r&d and innovation....
DESCRIPTION
OECD workshop on measuring the link between public procurement, R&D and innovation. "Impacts of Korean innovative procurement policies", presentation by Woosung LeeTRANSCRIPT
Impacts of Korean innovative
procurement policies
2013. 12.
Dr. Woosung Lee
Research Fellow
Science and Technology Policy Institute
1
목 차
I. KEIT (2013) Performance Analysis Report
II. Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
III. Cases
2
목 차
I. KEIT (2013) Performance Analysis Report
II. Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
III. Case
3
4
Case1: New Technology Purchasing Assurance
Overview
“In an effort to further commercialize new technologies, government agencies, public institutions including Defense Ministry, KEPCO (Korea Electric Power Corp.). KOGAS (Korea Gas Corporation), and Korea Railroad Corporation and private business commission SMEs to develop a new technology with the assurance that they will purchase the technological products. Under this program, the SMBA finances the technological development of SMEs, while public institutions purchase the products for a certain period of time.
Certification (NEP, NET etc.)
NTPA R&D grants
Public/Private Procurement
Targeting 10%
5
Case1: New Technology Purchasing Assurance
Trends: New Technology Purchase Assurance Program
Data Source: The Small & Medium Business Administration
(Note: Total numbers indicate accumulated figures)
Subsidy (100million, KRW) # of Purchasing Organizations # of Firms
Supported Total Public Organizations Large Firms
2002 9 1 1 0 13
2003 40 1 1 0 49
2004 40 8 8 0 40
2005 100 26 18 8 87
2006 160 45 25 20 154
2007 300 83 32 51 230
2008 400 127 36 91 254
2012 645
Purchasing Organizations
Data Source: Hong (2008), “Trend & Issues on SME Public Purchasing R&D Promotion”, KIET Industrial Economy Analysis
Participating Organizations (Purchasing Party)
Public Organizations (32)
National Organization
National Police Agency, Defense Department, National Emergency Management Agency, Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Korea Coast Guard, Korea Meteorological Administration, Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
Local Government
Daejeon, Samcheok
Public Organization
Korea Coal Corporation, Korea Gas Corporation, Korea Airports Corporation, Korea South-East Power, Korea Southern Power, Korea Rural Corporation, Korea East·West Power, Korea Western Power, Korea National Oil Corporation, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power, Korea Electric Power Corporation, Korea Minting and Security Printing Corporation, Korea Midland Power., Korea District Heating Corp., KORAIL, Korea Rail Network Authority, Environmental Management Corporation, Seoul National University of Technology, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Korea Electrical Safety Corporation
Local Public Utility
Seoul Metro, Seoul Metropolitan Rapid Transit Corporation
Large Private Firms (Total 51)
Keumho Tire, Daewoo Electronics, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd., LG Dacom Corporation, Doosan Engine Co., Ltd, Doosaninfracore, Samsung Electro-mechanics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics, Samsung Heavy Industries, Samchully Co., Ltd., Korea Delphi Automotive Systems Corporation, Hyosung Co., Ltd., KT, LG International Corp., LG Electronics, POSCO, SKC, STX Engine, STX Group, STX Shipbuiliding, Dae Dong Industrial, Dae Won Kang Up Co., Ltd., Dongwon Systems, Meister, Magna Chip Semiconductors, Samsung Fine Chemicals, Samsung Corning, Samsung Techwin, Saehan, Semes, Sebang, Secron, Shinheung, Amore-Pacific, Asiana IDT, IDS, Inkel, GMB Korea, Cuckoo Electronics, Clark Material Handling Asia, Hynix Semiconductors, Alcatel-Lucent Korea, Fuji Film Korea, Hanwha L&C, DK UIL, KT Networks, KTFT, LG Life Science, LG Innotek, LG Philips LCD, S&T Daewoo
Performance analysis scheme
7
Division Indicators of analysis Definition
Input R & D manpower Research manpower put into and related to technology development to perform tasks
Employee Company's total number of employees for performing tasks
Building the basis for technology developments Retention rate for research facilities and equipment as the default of infrastructure for research and development
Implementation
Planning Improvement of ability for the research and development planning due to task performance
Administration Systematic management for research achievements and the empowerment of intellectual property management due to task performance
Network The degree of contribution to Network Construction for joint research with other agencies due to task performance
Achievements creation Impact for the creation of research and development achievements
Exchange activities Information of research and development and the degree of human resources exchange activities
Promoting a joint research Intentions of a promotion for the future collaborative research
Quantitative
performance
Academic ability Presentations and papers published on the national and international professional journals related to the technology development for performing tasks
Patent The national and international patent application and registration related to the technology development for performing tasks
Other Intellectual Property Rights Application and registration of domestic and international utility model and design other than patents
Technical
performance
Technology gap The difference between the world best technology and the technology for task performance
Changes in technology level The difference between the world best level of technology and the level of technology developed through performing projects
Degree of the technology independence The degree of relative independence of technology developed through performing projects
Economic
performance
Sales amount Total sales due to technology or product developed through performing projects
Export amount Total exports due to technology or product developed through performing projects
Amount of import substitution The expected total amount of import substitution in the case of substitution with products developed through performing projects for existing import
goods
Reduce ratio of the production cost Reduction ratio of the production cost due to technology development through performing projects
Additional cost required to commercialization Additional costs putted into for realizing a commercialization and the public applying
Operating Profit Operating Profit of the product developed through performing projects
Number of new employees Number of new employment induced to produce product developed through performing projects
Contribution/
ramifications
Technical contributions The contribution of technology developed through performing projects
Contribution to total sales The contribution to the total sales of the technology or product developed through performing projects
Contribution to creation of new jobs The contribution of new employment due to technology or product developed through performing projects
Ability improvement of information gathering Improvement of ability for information gathering due to performing projects
Improvements of technology Improvement of technology due to performing projects
Product improvement The effect of product improvement due to performing projects
Process Improvement The effect of process improvement due to performing projects
Environment for research and development Improvement and enhancement of the environment for research and development due to performing projects
research manpower The ability improvement of research manpower due to performing projects
Company Image Improvement and enhancement of the company's public image and awareness due to performing projects
<Table> the configuration of analysis indicators
Target populations for analysis
8
<Table> distribution of population and respondents
Category
# of population # of respondent surveyed response rate
successful
project
failed
project total
successful
project
failed
project total
successful
project
failed
project total
All 395 33 428 283 15 298 71.6 45.5 69.6
Enterprise
public 139 11 150 96 6 102 69.1 54.5 68.0
private 229 20 249 165 8 173 72.1 40.0 69.5
overseas 27 2 29 22 1 23 81.5 50.0 79.3
Support year
2007 149 14 163 105 5 110 70.5 35.7 67.5
2008 148 12 160 98 8 106 66.2 66.7 66.3
2009 98 7 105 80 2 82 81.6 28.6 78.1
Technical field
Mechine·material 145 13 158 106 7 113 73.1 53.8 71.5
BioㆍHealth 15 1 16 12 1 13 80.0 100.0 81.3
Electricㆍelectronic 130 11 141 88 4 92 67.7 36.4 65.2
Information and
Communications 62 7 69 40 2 42 64.5 28.6 60.9
Information service 9 0 9 9 0 9 100.0 - 100.0
Chemistry 34 1 35 28 1 29 82.4 100.0 82.9
(Unit: number, %)
Target populations for analysis
9
<Table> Technical steps
category Technical
development Introduction of
technology Technical
growth Technology
maturity Technical
decline n/a Total
total project # of project 21 68 134 59 9 7 298
Ratio (%) 7.1 22.8 45.0 19.8 3.0 2.4
successful
project
# of project 14 64 131 59 8 7 283
Ratio (%) 5.0 22.6 46.3 20.9 2.8 2.5
failed project # of project 7 4 3 0 1 0 15
Ratio (%) 46.7 26.7 20.0 0.0 6.7 0.0
(Unit: number, %)
Technical steps
Target populations for analysis
10
<Table> Commercialization step (Unit: number, %)
category failed
commerciali
zation
progress of a commercialization end of a
commercialization
total complete
pro-type of
production
prototype
production purchase
planning
closing a
delivery
contract
entry
commercial
production line on sale
sale
suspension
total project # of project 42 19 35 30 23 14 122 13 298
ratio(%) 14.1 6.4 11.7 10.1 7.7 4.7 40.9 4.4
successful project # of project 33 18 33 29 23 14 121 12 283
ratio(%) 11.7 6.4 11.7 10.3 8.1 5.0 42.8 4.2
failed project # of project 9 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 15
ratio(%) 60.0 6.7 13.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 6.7
<Table> definition of commercialization step
commercialization step definition
failed commercialization stage 0 : give up commercialization due to internal and external factors
progress of commercialization
stage 1 : complete pro-type of production
stage 2: produce prototype production after a pilot
stage 3: purchase planning with purchase organization
stage 4: close a delivery contract with purchase organization
stage 5: entry commercial production line
successful commercialization stage 6: continues to sell the product or process in the current
stage 7: while selling the product or process is now aborted
Commercialization step
Increase of research
development planning
capability
Systematization of research
performance management Increase of IP
management capacity Contribution on cooperative
construction with other agencies
Total Projects 4.05 3.83 3.64 3.41
Projects succeeded 4.06 3.83 3.65 3.40
Projects failed 3.87 3.80 3.47 3.80
<Table> Degree of increases on Research project managing ability of new product development project
with purchasing condition
(Unit: point)
Analysis of Program Performance
Degree of effect on
creation of research
development
performance
Degree of research development
information exchange activities
Degree of research
development manpower
exchange activities
Inclination to promote
future joint research
Total Projects 3.44 3.35 3.25 3.48
Projects
succeeded 3.43 3.35 3.25 3.48
Projects failed 3.80 - - -
<Table> Effects of joint research project on new product development project with purchasing condition
(Unit: point)
Performance of Technology development
2007 2008 2009 Total # of projects
generated # of articles
generated # of article per 100 million
won(government support) Total 2 2 4 8 8 1.00 0.43
Project Field Public 0 1 0 1 1 1.00 0.59 Private 2 1 4 7 7 1.00 0.41 Foreign 0 0 0 0 0 - -
Phase of
Commercializati
on
Success 0 0 1 1 1 1.00 0.59 Progress 1 2 3 6 6 1.00 0.41 Failure 1 0 0 1 1 1.00 0.42
Technology
Field
Machinery·Material 0 0 3 3 3 1.00 0.40 BioㆍHealth 2 0 0 2 2 1.00 0.41
ElectricityㆍElectronics 0 0 0 0 0 - - Information&
Communications 0 0 0 0 0 - -
Knowledge service 0 1 0 1 1 1.00 0.59 Chemistry 0 1 1 2 2 1.00 0.43
Technology base 0 0 0 0 0 - -
<Table> Number of articles of new product development project with purchasing condition
(Unit: number)
(Unit: number)
Analysis of Program Performance
Quantitative Performance
(Unit: number)
Analysis of Program Performance
2007 2008 2009 Total # of projects
generated # of articles generated
# of article per 100 million
won (government support)
Patent Application 1 10 13 24 15 1.60 0.50
Registration 1 3 3 7 7 1.00 0.40
Utility model Application 0 0 0 0 0 - -
Registration 0 0 3 3 1 3.00 1.45
Design Application 0 0 5 5 1 5.00 1.23
Registration 0 0 1 1 1 1.00 0.48
Total 2 13 25 40 25 1.60 0.60
<Table> Performance of intellectual property right of new product development project with purchasing condition
(Unit: number)
Quantitative Performance
Number of projects Before the projects After the projects Improvement of technological gap
Total 283 4.27 2.73 1.54
2007 105 4.39 2.46 1.93
2008 98 4.26 3.15 1.11
2009 80 4.14 2.58 1.56
Commercialization-Success 133 4.70 2.83 1.87
Commercialization-Progress 117 4.00 2.80 1.20
Commercialization-Failure 33 3.52 2.09 1.42
Public 96 4.97 3.02 1.95
Private 165 3.87 2.58 1.28
Foreign 22 4.27 2.59 1.68
Machinery·Material 106 4.64 2.44 2.20
BioㆍHealth 12 2.83 2.50 0.33
ElectricityㆍElectronics 88 4.17 2.59 1.58
Information& Communications 40 3.28 2.85 0.43
Knowledge service 9 5.44 2.78 2.66
Chemistry 28 4.86 4.18 0.68
<Table> Performance of intellectual property right of new product development project
with purchasing condition
(Unit: number)
Analysis of Program Performance
Technical Performance
Before the projects After the projects Degree of Increase
All 60.7 86.9 26.2
2007 57.8 87.0 29.2
2008 61.2 86.1 24.9
2009 63.8 87.8 24.0
Commercialization-Success 61.5 88.7 27.2
Commercialization-Progress 58.8 85.9 27.1
Commercialization-Failure 64.3 83.2 18.9
Public 60.2 87.9 27.7
Private 60.5 86.3 25.8
Foreign 64.4 87.1 22.7
Machinery·Material 59.4 88.1 28.7
BioㆍHealth 71.8 88.0 16.2
ElectricityㆍElectronics 59.5 87.3 27.8
Information& Communications 63.3 84.5 21.2
Knowledge service 58.8 81.6 22.8
Chemistry 61.4 85.9 24.5
<Table> Improvement of technology level of new product development project with purchasing condition
(Unit: %)
Analysis of Program Performance
Technical Performance
Before the projects After the projects Degree of Increase
Total 64.1 87.4 23.3
2007 61.5 87.4 25.9
2008 60.2 86.3 26.1
2009 62.7 88.9 26.2
Commercialization-Success 61.5 88.8 27.3
Commercialization-Progress 60.5 87.0 26.5
Commercialization-Failure 64.0 83.1 19.1
Public 62.5 88.6 26.1
Private 60.1 86.4 26.3
Foreign 66.4 90.0 23.6
Machinery·Material 58.4 87.8 29.4
BioㆍHealth 67.6 93.0 25.4
ElectricityㆍElectronics 63.3 87.4 24.1
Information& Communications 61.6 85.6 24.0
Knowledge service 67.2 87.2 20.0
Chemistry 61.9 86.4 24.5
<Table> change of technical self-reliance of new product development project with purchasing condition
(Unit: %)
Analysis of Program Performance
Technical Performance
<Figure> Comparison of sales (Unit: number, million won)
(a) Number of projects (b) sales per projects (c) sales per 100 million won (government support)
Analysis of Program Performance
# of projects Avg. of Sales Total Sales of
projects Total government
support Sales per 100 million won
(government support)
Total projects 283 1,263.12 357,462.96 55,796.00 640.66
Projects generated 144 2,482.38 357,462.72 28,852.00 1,238.95
<Table> Sales
(Unit: number, million won)
Economic Performance
<Figure> Comparison of export amount
(Unit: number, million won)
(a)Number of projects (b) Export amount per projects (c) Export amount per 100 million won (government support)
Analysis of Program Performance
# of projects Avg. of export
amount per project Total export
amount Total government
support Export amount per 100 million
won(government support)
Total projects 283 181.27 51,300.00 55,796.00 91.94
Projects generated 43 1,193.02 51,299.86 8,605.00 596.16
<Table> Export amount (Unit: number, million won)
Economic Performance
<Figure> Comparison of import substitution amount
(Unit: number, million won)
(a) Number of projects (b) Import substitution amount per projects (c) Import substitution amount per 100million won
(government support)
Analysis of Program Performance
# of projects Avg. of import substitution
amount per project Total import
substitution amount Total government
support Import substitution amount per 100million
won(government support)
Total projects 283 585.26 165,629.00 55,796.00 296.85
Projects generated 56 2,957.66 165,628.96 10,971.00 1,509.70
<Table> Import Substitution amount (Unit: number, million won)
Economic Performance
<Figure> Comparison on percentage of production cost saving of developing product
(Unit: number, %)
(a) Number of projects (b) Percentage of production cost savings per project (c) Percentage of production cost saving
per 100million won government contributions
Analysis of Program Performance
category # of projects Average
(%)
Total sum of Percentage of
production cost saving of the
pertinent project (%)
Total sum of the
contributions (million won)
Percentage of production cost saving per
100million won government
contributions (%)
Total projects 283 5.56 1,574.00 55,796.00 2.82
Pertinent
projects 90 17.49 1,574.00 16,630.00 9.46
<Table> percentage of production cost saving
(Unit: number, million won, %)
Economic Performance
<Figure> Comparison on additional costs spending on commercialization
(Unit: number, million won)
(a) Number of projects (b) Additional costs on commercialization per project (c) Additional costs per 100million won contributions
Analysis of Program Performance
category Number of
projects Average
additional cost
Total sum of additional cost
spending on
commercialization of the pertinent project
Total sum of the
contributions (million won)
Additional cost per
100million won government
contributions
Total projects 283 63.71 18,029.00 55,796.00 32.31
Pertinent projects 99 182.11 18,029.00 19,940.00 90.42
<Table> Additional costs spending on commercialization
(Unit: number, million won)
Commercialization result
<Figure> Comparison on operating profit
(Unit: number, million won)
(a) Number of projects (b) Operating profit per project (c) Operating profit per 100million won government contributions
Analysis of Program Performance
category # of projects Average
operating profit
Total sum of
operating profit of the
pertinent project
Total sum of the
contributions (million won)
Operating profit per
100million won government
contributions
Total projects 2,373 65.79 156,114.00 359,928.55 43.37
Pertinent projects 880 177.40 156,114.00 129,655.00 120.41
<Table> Operating profit
(Unit: number, million won)
Commercialization result
<Figure> Comparison on new employment
(Unit: number, person)
(a) Number of projects (b) New employment (c) New employment per 100million won government contributions
Analysis of Program Performance
<Table> Operating profit
(Unit: number, mission won person)
category Number of
projects Average new
employment
Total number of
employees of the
pertinent project
Total sum of the
contributions (million won)
Employment per 100million won
government contributions
Total projects 283 0.80 226 55,796.00 0.41
Pertinent projects 92 2.46 226 18,998.00 1.19
Commercialization result
<Figure> Comparison for the contribution
Analysis of Program Performance
<Figure> Ramifications
<Figure> Research and Development Environment <Figure> Research manpower and images of purchase-
conditional new product development projects
Contribution and ramifications
<Figure> The factors of a participation in purchase-conditional projects for new product development
Analysis of Program Performance
<Figure> The factors of a re-participation in purchase-conditional projects for new product development
Diagnosis
<Figure> The factors carried out successfully on purchase-conditional projects for new product development
Analysis of Program Performance
<Figure> The difficulties factors of purchase-conditional projects for new product development
Diagnosis
<Figure> The difficulties on the production side of purchase-conditional projects for new product development
Analysis of Program Performance
<Figure> The difficulties on the selling side of purchase-conditional projects for new product development
Diagnosis
<Table> Variables to analyze influencing factors upon the sales generated
Name of Variables Attribute or Unit
Dependent Variables Whether the sales are generated or not 0: yes, 1 : no
Total amount of sales generated 1,000,000 KRW
Independent
Variables
Inputs
Number of researchers in the R&D project Number Number of doctors in the R&D project Number Number of masters in the R&D project Number
Number of bachelors in the R&D project Number Number of other personnel in the R&D project Number
Research facilities and equipment retention rate before the R&D project Five point scale
Research facilities and equipment retention rate after the R&D project Five point scale
Spending in the R&D in 2011 1,000,000 KRW
Academic achievements
(theses and intellectual
property rights)
Number of foreign theses Number Number of local thesis Number
Number of registered patent application Number Number of registered utility model application Number
Number of registered design application Number
Technological achievements
Years of technology gap before the R&D project Number Narrowing years of technology gap after the R&D project Number
Current technology gap Five point scale Change in technology gap Five point scale
Technology independence before the R&D project Five point scale Technology independence after the R&D project Five point scale
Whether the technology is eco-friendly or not 0: no, 1: yes
Economic achievements
Amount of the export of developed products in 2011 1,000,000 KRW
Amount of the sales of products which substituted import in 2011 1,000,000 KRW
Percentage of reduction in product costs in 2011 % Additional expense for commercialization in 2011 1,000,000 KRW
Number of newly employed personnel for the R&D project in 2011 Number
Control Variables Technological sectors
Machinery and materials, bio technology and medicine, electronics
and electrics, information and communications, chemicals
The year when support was made 2007, 2008, and 2009
Empirical Analyses : logistic Regression
Introduction to the Analyses
<Table> Variables which influence the successful performance of innovative firms
Name of Variables Attribute or Unit
Dependent Variables Whether the performance of innovative firms is successful or not 0: not successful or not yet
delivered 1: successful
Independent
Variables
Ability to manage the R&D
Improvement in the ability to design the R&D Five point scale
Systematic management of R&D achievements Five point scale
Improvement in the capacity to manage intellectual property rights Five point scale
Contribution to the establishment of the shared network with other
organizations Five point scale
Level of contribution Level of technological contribution to the R&D project Five point scale
Level of contribution to the total sales Five point scale Level of contribution to the creation of jobs Five point scale
Ripple effects
Technological
improvement
Improvement in the ability to collect the information about advanced
technologies and market trends Five point scale
Securing core technologies Five point scale
Enhancement of the ability to improve existing products Five point scale
Enhancement of the ability to develop new products Five point scale
Enhancement of the ability to improve existing manufacturing
processes Five point scale
Enhancement of the ability to improve new manufacturing processes Five point scale
Shortening the period to develop technologies Five point scale
Research
environment and its
image
Improving research atmosphere Five point scale Increase in the investment in the R&D Five point scale Expansion of the group for the R&D Five point scale Equipment of facilities for the R&D Five point scale
Improvement of the status of R&D personnel Five point scale Increase in the number of R&D personnel Five point scale Enhancement of the capacity for the R&D Five point scale
Improvement in the image and awareness of the public Five point scale
Empirical Analyses : logistic Regression
Introduction to the Analyses
<Table> Relationship between the likelihood of the generation of the sales through the R&D project and inputs
Variables Regression
coefficient Standard error
Chi-squared
value P-value
Standardized
regression
coefficient
Intercept 0.240 0.613 0.15 0.70
Total number of researchers in the R&D project -0.013 0.010 1.75 0.19 -0.12
Number of doctors in the R&D project -0.189 0.137 1.90 0.17 -0.12
Number of masters in the R&D project 0.143 0.093 2.37 0.12 0.14
Number of bachelors in the R&D project -0.031 0.040 0.60 0.44 -0.06
Number of other personnel in the R&D project 0.184 0.083 4.95 0.03 0.23
Research facilities and equipment retention rate
before the R&D project -0.003 0.149 0.00 0.98 0.00
Research facilities and equipment retention rate
after the R&D project 0.171 0.132 1.69 0.19 0.10
Spending in the R&D in 2011 0.000 0.000 0.24 0.62 0.04
Empirical Analyses : logistic Regression
Result of the Overall Analyses
<Table> Relationship between the sales generated through the R&D project and inputs
Variables Regression
coefficient Standard error
Chi-squared
value P-value
Standardized
regression
coefficient Intercept 2400.964 5002.968 0.48 0.63 0.00
Total number of researchers in the R&D project 255.580 119.952 2.13 0.04 0.26 Number of doctors in the R&D project 192.967 1154.424 0.17 0.87 0.02 Number of masters in the R&D project -832.656 714.799 -1.16 0.25 -0.13
Number of bachelors in the R&D project -585.343 323.524 -1.81 0.07 -0.19 Number of other personnel in the R&D project 434.119 452.736 0.96 0.34 0.09 Research facilities and equipment retention rate
before the R&D project 1334.373 1234.934 1.08 0.28 0.11
Research facilities and equipment retention rate
after the R&D project 392.033 1159.579 0.34 0.74 0.03
Spending in the R&D in 2011 -1.145 1.456 -0.79 0.43 -0.08
Empirical Analyses : logistic Regression
<Table> Relationship between the likelihood of the generation of the sales through the
R&D project and academic achievements (theses and intellectual property rights)
Variables Regression
coefficient Standard error
Chi-squared
value P-value
Standardized
regression
coefficient Intercept 0.8944 0.4737 3.5655 0.059
Number of foreign theses -15.212 1368.200 0.00 0.99 -0.69 Number of local thesis -1.264 1.253 1.02 0.31 -0.08
Number of registered patent application 0.075 0.296 0.06 0.80 0.02
Number of registered utility model application -5.237 667.600 0.00 0.99 -0.50
Number of registered design application 0.000 . . . .
Result of the Overall Analyses
<Table> Relationship between the sales generated through the R&D project and academic achievements
(theses and intellectual property rights)
Variables Regression
coefficient Standard error Chi-squared value P-value
Standardized regression
coefficient Intercept 4584.17494 3740.79434 1.23 0.2226 0
Number of foreign theses 0.000 . . . . Number of local thesis 417.114 13432.000 0.03 0.98 0.00
Number of registered patent application 171.094 1840.626 0.09 0.93 0.01
Number of registered utility model
application 0.000 . . . .
Number of registered design application 0.000 . . . .
Empirical Analyses : logistic Regression
Variables Regression
coefficient Standard error Chi-squared value P-value
Standardized regression
coefficient Intercept -1.1927 0.9398 1.6108 0.2044
Years of technology gap before the R&D
project 0.011 0.051 0.05 0.83 0.02
Narrowing years of technology gap after the
R&D project -0.482 0.251 3.70 0.05 -0.21
Current technology gap in years -0.013 0.045 0.08 0.77 -0.03 Current technology level 0.659 0.307 4.63 0.03 0.23
Technology independence before the R&D
project 0.118 0.243 0.24 0.63 0.05
Technology independence after the R&D
project 0.159 0.299 0.28 0.59 0.06
Whether the technology is eco-friendly or not 0.169 0.308 0.30 0.58 0.04
<Table> Relationship between the likelihood of the generation of the sales through the R&D project and technological achievements
Result of the Overall Analyses
<Table> Relationship between the sales generated through the R&D project and technological achievements
Variables Regression
coefficient Standard error
Chi-squared
value P-value
Standardized regression
coefficient Intercept 9561.882 8255.291 1.16 0.25 0.00
Years of technology gap before the R&D project -190.884 450.674 -0.42 0.67 -0.05 Narrowing years of technology gap after the R&D project 2693.892 2331.697 1.16 0.25 0.16
Current technology gap in years 25.073 388.244 0.06 0.95 0.01 Current technology level -1840.963 2620.563 -0.70 0.48 -0.08
Technology independence before the R&D project 1263.323 2021.160 0.63 0.53 0.08 Technology independence after the R&D project -1930.531 2618.960 -0.74 0.46 -0.09
Whether the technology is eco-friendly or not -391.607 2536.430 -0.15 0.88 -0.01
Empirical Analyses : logistic Regression
<Table> Relationship between the likelihood of the generation of the sales through the R&D project and economic achievements
Variables Regression
coefficient Standard error Chi-squared value P-value
Standardized
regression coefficient
Intercept -0.00919 0.5215 0.0003 0.9859
Amount of the export of developed products in 2011 0.003 0.001 6.13 0.01 1.19
Amount of the sales of products which substituted import in
2011 0.006 0.003 4.69 0.03 11.19
Percentage of reduction in product costs in 2011 0.028 0.013 4.81 0.03 0.22
Additional expense for commercialization in 2011 0.001 0.001 0.62 0.43 0.12
Number of newly employed personnel for the R&D project in
2011 0.050 0.081 0.39 0.53 0.06
Result of the Overall Analyses
<Table> Relationship between the sales generated through the R&D project and economic achievements
Variables Regression
coefficient Standard error Chi-squared value P-value
Standardized regression
coefficient
Intercept 4901.988 3743.670 1.31 0.19 0.00
Amount of the export of developed products in
2011 0.770 1.113 0.69 0.49 0.07
Amount of the sales of products which substituted
import in 2011 0.213 0.249 0.86 0.39 0.08
Percentage of reduction in product costs in 2011 -15.207 77.026 -0.20 0.84 -0.02
Additional expense for commercialization in 2011 -2.101 4.532 -0.46 0.64 -0.04
Number of newly employed personnel for the R&D
project in 2011 -220.512 560.131 -0.39 0.69 -0.04
Empirical Analyses : logistic Regression
Result of the Overall Analyses
목 차
I. KIAT(2013) Performance Analysis Report
II. Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
III. Case
35
<Figure> state of use government support system
(Unit: %)
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
Manufacturing sector
Utilization status of government support system
Tax
exemption on
technology
development
Technology
development/Co
mmercialization
support
Participation in
governmental
R&D project
Governmental
technical support
and guidance
Providing
technical
information
Technical
manpower and
educational
research support
Gov./public
sector purchasing Marketing
support
Total 5.4 13.9 5.5 3.9 3.5 3.1 1.9 4.1 10. Food 2.9 10.1 3.6 3.3 1.7 2.7 0.6 4.5 11. Beverage 6.4 12.7 6.4 6.4 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 13. Textile 4.3 9.5 5.4 5.9 4.9 2.5 1.8 2.0 14.Clothes 1.0 2.2 2.5 0.6 1.9 1.6 1.2 1.6 15.Leather 0.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16. Lumber 8.0 9.5 3.2 6.3 6.3 3.2 3.2 9.5 17. Wood pulp 3.8 6.2 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.6 1.5 18. Printing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 19.Cokes 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 20.Chemical 12.9 19.8 8.4 4.5 3.9 4.6 3.9 7.0 21.Medicine 27.0 40.4 26.3 23.8 5.2 9.7 0.0 23.4 22.Rubber product 3.3 6.3 3.0 2.0 2.6 1.2 0.6 1.2 23. Non-metal 3.1 12.3 2.9 2.9 0.9 2.0 6.2 2.0 24. Primary metal 1.8 8.8 1.7 0.6 3.4 1.6 0.3 0.3 25.Metal processing 3.3. 15.8 2.1 3.3 2.8 1.4 1.3 2.3 26.Electronic 6.6 14.8 10.8 4.5 5.3 3.7 0.8 3.2 27.Medical 16.5 19.1 10.1 7.1 3.4 5.8 4.6 12.4 28.Electrical
equipment 6.6 21.1 8.7 3.9 3.4 3.5 2.3 6.3
29.Other machine 7.5 19.6 8.5 5.6 5.3 5.3 3.2 6.7 30.Wheels 4.5 19.0 5.9 3.4 3.1 2.6 0.2 2.3 31.Other
transportation 4.1 13.4 10.9 6.8 7.6 7.8 4.1 9.0
32.Furniture 5.4 11.8 3.1 2.4 2.4 3.4 4.7 7.8 33.Other products 3.4 10.8 4.3 4.4 4.4 6.4 0.0 3.2
<Table> utilization status of government support system: type of business (Unit: %)
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
Manufacturing sector Utilization status of government support system
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
<Table> utilization status of government support system: number of employees and legal forms of business
Category Tax exemption
on technology
development
Technology
development/
Commercializ
ation support
Participation in Gov. R&D proj
ect
Gov. technical
assistance and
guidance
Providing
technical
information
Technical
manpower and
educational
research
support
Gov./public
sector
purchasing
Market
ing
support
Total 5.4 13.9 5.5 3.9 3.5 3.1 1.9 4.1
Number
of
workers
10~49 4.7 13.4 4.3 3.4 3 2.7 1.8 3.9 50~99 7.4 15.1 9.1 5.6 4.9 3.9 2.6 3.8
100~299 10.6 17.3 14.7 7.9 7.5 5.7 2.1 5.8 300~499 18.9 22.7 24.4 5.4 6.3 9 4.1 17.1
Above 500 21.3 31.2 22.5 8.2 10.7 10.1 5 10.3
Legal
forms of
business
Large
company 20.9 27.5 21.9 7.5 9.8 10.4 5.4 14.8
Medium
company 9.9 17.2 10 6.3 5.4 5.2 2.5 5.4
Small
company 4 12.8 4.1 3.2 2.9 2.4 1.7 3.6
(Unit: %)
Manufacturing sector
Utilization status of government support system
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
Manufacturing sector
The Importance of Government support system
Tax exemption on
technology
development
Technology
development/Co
mmercialization
support
Participation in
governmental
R&D project
Governmental
technical support
and guidance
Providing
technical
information
Technical
manpower and
educational
research support
Gov./public
sector
purchasing
Marketing
support
Total 44.4 51.2 44.2 33.5 22.7 30.9 32.3 43.1 10. Food 73.4 47.4 30.6 8.0 7.7 23.0 100.0 32.7 11. Beverage 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 13. Textile 46.5 46.9 45.6 41.8 26.8 26.8 36.7 66.7 14.Clothes 0.0 72.1 25.0 0.0 33.3 61.3 50.0 61.3 15.Leather - 400.0 100.0 100.0 - - - 16. Lumber 50.0 33.3 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 66.7 17. Wood pulp 49.5 24.6 - 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 18. Printing - - - - - 0.0 - - 19.Cokes 0.0 - - - - - - 0.0 20.Chemical 44.1 61.2 71.0 86.4 16.6 42.7 16.6 38.7 21.Medicine 53.8 65.0 47.7 76.3 7.7 79.0 - 79.3 22.Rubber product 30.3 44.9 32.6 0.0 27.1 33.3 50.0 25.0 23. Non-metal 58.1 56.4 35.1 31.6 27.8 100.0 68.0 80.0 24. Primary metal 52.9 42.3 0.0 0.0 22.1 58.1 0.0 0.0
25.Metal processing 33.7 40.5 43.1 42.7 16.9 21.7 0.0 37.1
26.Electronic 51.3 48.6 50.6 15.8 19.8 38.4 29.5 45.7 27.Medical 39.9 50.6 37.1 47.5 75.0 35.4 44.7 36.8 28.Electrical
equipment 35.7 51.0 42.3 19.4 0.0 13.5 41.4 39.6
29.Other machine 44.6 62.1 46.0 31.8 16.5 25.3 9.8 48.0 30.Wheels 42.7 43.3 35.6 17.3 60.4 16.3 0.0 25.8 31.Other
transportation 45.2 83.2 71.8 27.4 35.2 23.7 90.4 24.9
32.Furniture 86.5 20.0 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 60.4 33.Other products 65.9 70.2 0.0 26.3 0.0 50.0 - 0.0
<Table> the importance of government support system(‘high’) : by business (Unit: %)
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
Manufacturing sector
The Importance of Government support system
<Table> the importance of government support system(‘high’) : number of employees and legal forms of business
(Unit: %)
Category
Tax
exemption on
technology
development
Technology
development/ Commercializati
on support
Participation
in Gov. R&D
project
Gov. technical
assistance and
guidance
Providing
technical
information
Technical
manpower and
educational
research
support
Gov./public
sector
purchasing
Marketi
ng
support
Total 44.4 51.2 44.2 33.5 22.7 30.9 32.3 43.1
Number of
workers
10~49 43.9 41.6 43.9 32 24 31.9 35.5 44.2 50~99 45.9 48.4 41.1 43.6 9.5 22.4 16.7 34.9
100~299 47.8 48.1 47.1 28.7 29.8 32.1 28.4 45.7 300~499 33.7 52 58.1 46.2 15.5 38.6 15.7 32.9
Above 500 45.8 55 39.6 45.1 33.9 36.5 22.6 39.2
Legal forms of
business
Large
company 43.5 56.3 59.1 34.4 34.1 30.4 28.3 34.2
Medium
company 50.3 48.2 43.2 29.9 17.4 30.2 23.3 38.9
Small
company 40.4 41 43.7 35.5 24.9 31.4 35.9 45.3
<Figure> state of use government support system
(Unit: %)
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
Service Sector
Utilization status of government support system
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
<Table> utilization status of government support system: number of employees and legal forms of business
Category Tax exemption
on technology
development
Technology
development/
Commercializ
ation support
Participation in Gov. R&D proj
ect
Gov. technical
assistance and
guidance
Providing
technical
information
Technical
manpower and
educational
research
support
Gov./public
sector
purchasing
Market
ing
support
Total 5.4 13.9 5.5 3.9 3.5 3.1 1.9 4.1
Number
of
workers
10~49 4.7 13.4 4.3 3.4 3 2.7 1.8 3.9 50~99 7.4 15.1 9.1 5.6 4.9 3.9 2.6 3.8
100~299 10.6 17.3 14.7 7.9 7.5 5.7 2.1 5.8 300~499 18.9 22.7 24.4 5.4 6.3 9 4.1 17.1
Above 500 21.3 31.2 22.5 8.2 10.7 10.1 5 10.3
Legal
forms of
business
Large
company 20.9 27.5 21.9 7.5 9.8 10.4 5.4 14.8
Medium
company 9.9 17.2 10 6.3 5.4 5.2 2.5 5.4
Small
company 4 12.8 4.1 3.2 2.9 2.4 1.7 3.6
(Unit: %)
Utilization status of government support system Service Sector
<Table> the use degree of the government support system: the size and legal forms of business (Unit: %)
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
Utilization status of government support system Service Sector
Category Tax exemption on
technology
development
Technology
development/ Commercialization
support
Participation
in Gov. R&D
project
Gov.
technical
assistance
and guidance
Providing
technical
information
Technical
manpower
and
educational
research
support
Gov./public
sector
purchasing
Marketing
support
Total 3.2 9.0 3.4 2.4 2.8 3.9 1.8 2.5
Number
of
workers
10~49 2.7 8.7 3.3 2.2 2.9 3.9 1.6 2.5
50~99 4.2 7.5 2.7 2.8 3.3 3.6 1.9 1.9
100~299 4.1 10.2 3.7 2.3 1.5 3.5 1.7 2.7
300~499 5.7 13.8 5.4 2.6 3.1 4.7 3.2 2.3
Above 500 4.2 10.4 7.9 4.3 4.9 6.4 4.2 5.1
Legal
forms of
business
Large
company 5.7 12.1 10.4 4.5 4.7 5.6 5.1 5.2
Medium
company 5.5 10.0 5.6 3.3 2.9 5.6 2.6 3.2
Small
company 2.5 8.7 2.7 2.1 2.7 3.3 1.5 2.1
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
The Importance of Government support system
<Table> The importance of government support system (‘high’) : type of business (Unit: %)
Service Sector
Category Tax exemption on
technology
development
Technology
development/Comm
ercialization support
Participation in Gov. R&D
project
Gov.
technical
assistance
and
guidance
Providing
technical
information
Technical
manpower
and
educational
research
support
Gov./public
sector
purchasing
Marketing
support
Total 34.7 43.5 43.3 19.5 21.3 32.3 27.7 37.5
Wholesale/Retail 36.2 24.1 57.1 27.2 27.4 33.0 42.3 48.6
Transportation 45.4 54.7 4.9 10.9 12.1 3.5 18.5 0.0
Lodging/Food 50.4 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 0.0
Publishing/Broadcasting 42.5 52.5 46.4 13.3 3.2 32.4 11.0 32.2
Financial/Insurance 12.9 23.6 14.1 16.6 16.9 37.3 19.4 23.6
Real estate/Leasing service 100.0 29.8 100.0 33.6 100.0 42.3 38.5 45.0
Science/technology 29.1 44.9 41.7 33.1 38.5 20.7 22.6 12.6
Facilities management 0.0 58.1 50.0 18.3 26.3 17.5 0.0 0.0
Education 40.0 26.5 50.7 17.2 11.7 59.4 35.0 49.8
Health/Welfare 19.3 46.7 24.6 3.9 18.9 23.1 5.2 30.5
Art/Leisure 0.0 100.0 65.2 - 0.0 69.9 100.0 100.0
Repair/Private - 58.0 100.0 100.0 66.7 81.6 - 100.0
Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
The Importance of Government support system
<Table> the importance of government support system (‘high’): the size and legal forms of business
(Unit: %)
Service Sector
Category Tax exemption
on technology
development
Technology
development/Comm
ercialization support
Participation in Gov. R&D project
Gov. technical
assistance and
guidance
Providing
technical
information
Technical
manpower
and
educational
research
support
Gov./public
sector
purchasing
Marketing
support
Total 34.7 43.5 43.3 19.5 21.3 32.3 27.7 37.5
Number of
workers
10~49 28.7 37.9 42.9 14.4 18.3 30.8 24.7 35.8
50~99 49.7 53.6 56.6 27.5 17.6 33.3 18.2 53.3
100~299 38.6 52.6 36.8 35.3 48.2 42.4 50.2 51.5
300~499 44.3 59.0 36.1 29.8 36.3 33.7 38.2 17.5
Above 500 31.8 69.7 51.5 29.5 34.1 33.9 31.5 23.7
Legal forms
of business
Large company 45.3 56.6 43.8 15.7 19.1 33.0 29.1 24.4
Medium
company 38.1 51.5 40.7 18.8 21.2 26.4 30.3 34.8
Small company 32.0 40.2 44.9 19.8 19.2 33.8 26.0 37.1
목 차
I. KIAT(2013) Performance Analysis Report
II. Report on the Korean Innovation Survey(2012)
III. Case
46
Case - WooJin INC.
Foundation : 1980
Business sales : 4.4 billion won in 2007 and 11 billion dollars in 2010 This company has concentrated its energy on research and development field, and made research in domestic key industries
including the steel industry, semiconductor industry and nuclear industry since 1987 in which it set up the first measurement
technology laboratory. WooJin has made an investment in R & D field (research and development field) amounting to 5.8%
of the total sales since 2007. Its major technical field is measurement field and new material field.
1. measurement field
- development of TMS(Tele Meter System) data logger and monitoring software - development of device to measure thickness of slag for molten metal - development of digital measuring instrument for molten metal - development of NIMS ( NSSS (Nuclear Steam Supply System) Integrated Monitoring system. ) - development of a digital indicator of safety class for nuclear station. - development of digital M/A Station for nuclear station.
2. new material field
- development of high damping alloy (It is included in ferro-alloy and a new kind of alloy which can convert outside vibrational energy into thermal energy
through phase change of metal.) - development of high silicon cast iron with acid proof preventing various corrosion responses by making efficient oxide film.
option to purchase project As for WooJin, it can be a significant opportunity for growth to succeed in developing a measuring instrument
system used for nuclear reactor with Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power co., ltd. through research and development in
the long term in order to devise a new business plan during the foreign exchange crisis. In particular, with the
governmental technology development project with an option to purchase deciding buyer company in public in advance,
WooJin can succeed in developing a new measuring instrument in nuclear reactor field thanks to funding for research
and development. Moreover, Woojin is scheduled to make progress in development of technology through strategic
partnership with POSCO.
Company outline
Case - SeHwa Electronics
Foundation : established in 1987 and started an LCD Window department in 2000 SeHwa Electronics has dealt with an order of 'development of touch window using four wire resistance' from LG
Electronics for 12 months (from December 2007 to November 2008). Through this process, it was provided support
fund of 247 million won from the government. Before this task was completed, touch window using resistance
method used for mobile cellular phone from LG Electronics had to be entirely imported from foreign countries and
lagged behind developed countries like Japan in producing technology by more than 5 years.
Option to purchase project SeHwa Electronics to develop new touch window products used for
mobile cellular phone that would apply and combine touch screen basic technology, making integrate flat window
and touch screen with LG Electronics. In the process, a variety of core processes were utilized : technology to design
electrode pattern, to etch metallic oxide dealt with ITO deposition and to print high detailed patterns.
In addition, the company had to materialize simpler product structure by combining adhesive tape bonding technology,
UV printing and bonding technology, CNC detailed-operating technology.
Through this project, LG Electronics could reduce costs by using domestic parts and jumped to the same level of quality
and productivity of industrialized countries, as a result of which the major company had competitive price and quality
compared to developed countries. SeHwa Electronics also turned over 34.4 billion won for four years (from 2008 to 2011)
and secured technology with the same product. Moreover, this company added a new production line and brought about 100
new jobs.
Company outline
End of Document
Dr. Woosung Lee
Research Fellow
Economic Analysis Division
Science and Technology Policy Institute
82-2-3284-1781
49