of capping lids , drylines , and alberta thunderstorms* * and support to unstable
DESCRIPTION
Of Capping Lids , Drylines , and Alberta Thunderstorms* * and Support to UNSTABLE G.S. Strong - Ardrossan, AB Susan Skone - UofC, Calgary, AB Craig Smith - EC, Saskatoon, SK [email protected]. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Of Capping Lids, Drylines, and Alberta Thunderstorms** and Support to UNSTABLE
G.S. Strong - Ardrossan, AB Susan Skone - UofC, Calgary, ABCraig Smith - EC, Saskatoon, SK
A developing storm over Rocky Mountain House, 16 July 2003
All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. Chief Seattle, 1854.
2
To acknowledge all(?) our Sponsors & Contributors . . . .
3
The basic large-scale Conceptual Model
What to Look for:1) Synoptic conditions 6-18 hours preceding
- subsidence preceding upper ridge- ascent preceding upper trough- orographic subsidence/ascent- location - location - location
(where/when cyclogenesis?)
2) What’s going on between the synoptic and meso-γ scales?
4Storm formation ~ 18:30ZPre-storm period)
cm s-1
5
Critical changes occur in the BL during late-morning (1400-1600 UTC) . . .HOW?
6
Major Topographic Features to Consider
7
ProposedModification
to theMulti-scaleConceptual
Model ofAlberta
Thunderstormsto account for
dryline initiationof storms.
8
9
Surface Transect across Dryline
10
GPS Precipitable Water Trend on 20 July 2003
Storm peak moves by ~ 2200Z
Earliest radar echoes 2030Z
1730Z
11
How important is local evapotranspiration to storm formation?
- Some background for this from a study of moisture contrast between prairie grass and a wheat field in St. Denis, SK, July-August, 1992 (previously unpublished data).
St. Denis, SK Fieldsite, July-August, 1992
12
St. Denis, SK Crop/Grass ET Field Tests, July-Aug., 1992(18-day average for each half hour)
- after Hrynkiw & Strong (1992)
- grass- transition- wheat
13
Conclusions/Recommendations for UNSTABLE:1. Preceding (6-18 hours) synoptic conditions.2. What’s going on between scales? 2a) Everyone: Documented cloud photography and manual observations!!3) Document mesoscale conditions over foothills 2-6 hours preceding storm initiation.4) Note foothills topography.5) Need high temporal resolution soundings (2-hour intervals recommended during morning); tethered balloons and/or instrumented towers (100-m) would be great assets.6) Document storm initiation & life cycle (radar/satellite).7) Mobile surface transects deep into the foothills (late morning and mid-afternoon).8) High spatial/temporal resolution GPS PW data, concentrate on -4 to +2 hours of storm
initiation.9) Need reliable soil moisture (and ET) data in major soil zones regions.
Analyses:1. Precedent synoptic conditions, 6-18 hours.2. Precedent mesoscale conditions, 2-6 hours.3. Everything for storm initiation period (-1 to + hours)!4. Storm-scale (meso-gamma) for storm life cycle.5. Diurnal trends in all variables.
14
15
UNSTABLE Proposal to CFCAS, Feb 2002- To investigate synoptic to micro-scale interactions with thunderstorms at three interfaces as indicated, - Focus on the pre-storm to storm initiation periods.
16
17
Sundre (WAV)
(Skew-T)Soundings20 July 03
at 1530Z& 2352Z
Precipitable Water1530Z - 19.9 mm2352Z - 20.9 mm
EA3 18Z - 15.9 mmEA2 00Z - 15.7 mm
EF4 12Z - 15.6 mmEF4 17Z - 16.2 mm
18
Analyses of surface MIXING RATIO
19- after Strong (2005)
Climatological Trend of Mixing Ratio (YXD, YXE, YWG)