of ukraine
TRANSCRIPT
Energy Resources Availability and Modeling of Energy Consumption in Ukraine till 2100
Leonid Benkovskyi – National Nuclear Energy Generating Company
(NNEGC) “ENERGOATOM”
Наименование мероприятия и докладчик
1
Nuclear power plants There are 4 NPPs in operation in Ukraine, namely:
Zaporizhzhya NPP
Rivne NPP
Khmelnitsky NPP
South-Ukraine NPP
Ukrainian NPPs in operation
Rivne NPP
Khmelnitsky NPP
South Ukraine NPP
Zaporizhzhya NPP
Head office of NNEGC “ENERGOATOM”
Legend: Type of reactors
WWER-1000 WWER-440
KYIV
National Nuclear Energy Generating Company “Energoatom”
3
The State Enterprise
“National Nuclear
Energy Generating
Company ‘Energoatom”
was established in 1996
NNEGC “Energoatom”
comprises all Ukrainian
NPPs in operation
Рівненська АЕС
Rivne NPP
РІВНЕ
RIVNE Хмельницька АЕС
Khmelnitsky NPP
Южно-Українська АЕС
South Ukraine NPP Запорізька АЕС
Zaporizhzhya NPP
Дирекція НАЕК “ЕНЕРГОАТОМ”
Head office of NNEGC “ENERGOATOM”
Умовні позначки
Legend:
Типи реакторів
Type of reactors
ВВЕР-1000
WWER-1000
ВВЕР-440
WWER-440
ХМЕЛЬНИЦЬКИЙ
KHMELNITSKY
МИКОЛАЇВ
MYKOLAYIV
ЗАПОРІЖЖЯ
ZAPORIZHZHYA
КИЇВ
KYIV
NNEGC “Energoatom” is entrusted with functions of an Operating Organization responsible for safety of all operating NPPs of Ukraine
Electricity Generation in Ukraine Installed Capacities
HPP and other 12,2%
NPP 43,1%
TPP 44,7%
NPP 44,4%
TPP 40,3%
HPP and other 15,3%
Supply to SE “Energorynok” of Ukraine
HPP and other 10,5%
NPP 26,0%
TPP 63,5%
SE “NNEGC “Energoatom” in the energy system of Ukraine (for 2013)
4
• There are uranium deposits and mining capacities in Ukraine. The extracted uranium is used for fuel fabrication for the Ukrainian NPPs. The local uranium covers about 30% of nuclear fuel demand for Ukrainian NPPs (about 800 t per year).
• A decision was made to build a nuclear fuel fabrication plant. Its commissioning is scheduled in two stages. First stage in 2012-2015 and the second one – in 2016-2020. Design capacity of the plant will make up 800 fuel assemblies per year.
(FRONT END) Current status of nuclear power program in Ukraine
• Spent nuclear fuel of Rivne NPP, South-Ukraine NPP and Khmelnitska NPP is sent for reprocessing to Russian Federation.
• Spent nuclear fuel of Zaporizhzhya NPP is being stored in dry SNF storage facility at the site of Zaporizhzhya NPP.
Current status of nuclear power program in Ukraine (BACK END)
• A centralized SNF storage facility for spent nuclear fuel of VVER type reactors is under construction in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. The commissioning of CSNFSF is scheduled in 2015. (A resolution # 131-r dated 4.02.09 approved the feasibility study on investments and in 2012 a Law on nuclear installation siting and (construction) deployment was adopted). The design capacity of the CSNFSF is 16529 spent nuclear fuel assemblies, including 12010 spent nuclear fuel assemblies of VVER-1000 and 4519 spent nuclear fuel assemblies of VVER-440).
• Waste management. Waste treatment (evaporation of liquid radwaste, sorting and compaction of solid radwaste) is performed on-site. Facilities on deep reprocessing of radwaste is under deployment. In future radwaste may be transported to the enterprise “Vector” which is specialized in waste management.
Current status of nuclear power program in Ukraine (BACK END cont’d)
Forecast of Power Consumption in Ukraine
Forecast of Power Consumption in Ukraine
Subject to extensive use of non-conventional and renewable energy sources (NCRES) capacity the highest development rates could be observed in systems based on wind and solar energy.
The difference in electricity consumption rate with using for the options considered till 2100 makes up less than 1 % and is insignificant when building forecast for long-term period.
ОП НТЦ 10
Modeling of Energy Consumption in Ukraine till 2100
Demand/consumption energy structure of Ukraine
Ukraine energy structure is based on HydroPP, NPP and TPP. Among the
prevailing ones are NPP and TPP.
Ukraine has the excessive energy generation power.
The current structure of generation is not to change till 2020.
Ukraine has different types of natural resources covering 10-20% of self demand.
The most resource-consuming branches are metallurgy and chemical industry
accounting for 80%.
Производство электроэнергии, млрд кВт ч
11.5
6%
91.2
47%
89.8
47% ГЭС
Тепловые
Атомные
ОП НТЦ 11
Modeling of Energy Consumption in Ukraine till 2100
Natural Resources of Ukraine
Certain Prognostics Annual demand
Coil
mill. ton 56 700 117 500 64
mill.ton.eq.fuel 42 560 88 130 48
Oil mill. ton 117 725 10
mill.ton.eq.fuel 174 1081 14
Gas bill.м3 1200 5400 21,02
mill.ton.eq.fuel 1457 6559 24
Uranium thousand. tU 274 500 2,4
mill.ton.eq.fuel(for 235U)
5 350 9 800 47
ОП НТЦ 12
Modeling of Energy Consumption in Ukraine till 2100 Natural Resources of Ukraine. Uranium
Ukraine uranium reserves are estimated to be
500 thousand ton.
Till 2015 – 30% of own consumption
After 2015 to 2030 – 100%.
30% of annual consumption for 15 units is
800 ton.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
20062007
20082009
20102011
20122013
20142015
20162017
20182019
20202021
20222023
20242025
20262027
20282029
2030
Годы
Про
изво
дств
о ко
нцен
трат
а пр
ирод
ного
ура
на, т
ыс.
тонн
н
Потребности в концентрате природного урана
Проектные показатели производства уранового концентрата
ОП НТЦ 13
Most mines have been operated for more then 40 years.
Structure of coal demand:
- Energy generation – 46%;
- Metal industry – 29%;
- Heating – 3%;
- Other – 20%.
According to different assessments, coal resources are estimated to be depleted in 400 years.
Modeling of Energy Consumption in Ukraine to 2100
Natural Resources of Ukraine. The coal
ОП НТЦ 14
Modeling of Energy Consumption in Ukraine to 2100 Natural Resources of Ukraine. Gas and Oil
Oil
The oil consumption in Ukraine is 9.82 mill.ton.
Ukraine has 149 oil deposits. The industrial oil reserves are 117 mill. ton.
The projected reserves are estimated to be 725 mill. ton – 40 years.
Gas
The potential resource of Ukraine is 5.4 billion cubic meters, the industrial resource – 1.2 billion cubic meters. But most gas deposits are exhausted.
Ukraine has the state-owned gas stocks (11 storage facilities). But expensive cost and extraction dynamics do not open wide and promising prospects for their use in Ukraine.
Hydro
The large river hydro resources are exhausted.
Total capacity – 4.5 GW
ОП НТЦ 15
Oil Gas
Ukraine does not cover its own demand for oil and gas
Modeling of Energy Consumption in Ukraine till 2100
Natural Resources of Ukraine. Gas and Oil
NFC options
• Once-through NFC with LWR • Once-through NFC with ALWR • Once-through NFC with LWR and HWR on natural
uranium • Once-through NFC with LWR and HWR on low
enriched uranium (1,2%) • Partially closed NFC with LWR and HWR on
regenerated uranium • Closed NFC with LWR and FR(BR=0.98) • Closed NFC with LWR and FR(BR=1.2)
Once-through NFC with LWR Once-through NFC with HWR on natural uranium and LWR
Once-through NFC with HWR on low enriched uranium and LWR
Once-through NFC with HWR on regenerated uranium and LWR on MOX-fuel
NFC assessment as per methodology (1)
NFC assessment as per methodology(2)
Closed NFC with light water and fast reactors
19
Input data (1) ENERGY RESOURCES
19
Coal Gas Uranium [1]
Reserves 117,4 bln. t
(projected),
56,7 bln. t
(balance)
5,4 trln. m3
(projected reserves),
1,2 trln. m3
(industrial reserves)
105 000 t
(up to 130 USD/kgU)
119 000 t
(up to 260 USD/kgU)
Mining 60000 t/yr 20000 mln m3 / year
Price 100 $/tonn Import - 400 $ per
1000 m3
105 000 t
(up to 130 USD/kgU)
119 000 t
(up to 260 USD/kgU)
[1] Uranium 2009: Resources, Production and Demand ("Red Book")
20
Input data (2) Technology parameters
Technical and economic parameters of generating technologies used in MESSAGE
Title of parameter Coal-fired
plants
Gas-fired
plants
WPP
wind
HPP
hydro
SPP
solar
NPP (LWR)*
Load factor 0,55 0,32 0,26 0,56 0,15 0,85
Efficiency 0,343 0,57 0,33
Lifetime, years 40 30 25 80 15 45 – existing,
60 – new
Unit output, MW 420 480 50 500 50 1000
Construction period, years [33] 4 2 1 10 1 6
Investments, USD/kW(e) 1600 1300 1900 2200 5000 3600
Fixed costs, USD/kW 56,6 20,3 30,9 13,63 17 69,3
Variable costs, USD/MW×h 4,46 14,7 2,43 0,48
CO2, t/MW×h 0,9 0,33
CO2, tax, USD/tons **** 0,025 0,025
Fuel cost 100
USD/t
400
USD/1000 m3
***
Installed capacity, MW 35000 0** 83,95 5100 13800
* Reactors of other type may have different characteristics.
** At present, these capacities are unavailable, though MESSAGE may use them in the projected period.
*** The cost of uranium and relevant services is used for NPP in the model.
**** Tax Code of Ukraine, Article 243.
21
Input data for NFC modelling (1)
Cost of uranium conversion and enrichment, FA fabrication
Stage Unit Cost, USD/kg
Conversion USD/kg 15
Enrichment USD/SWU 155
FA fabrication:
Light-water reactor, UOX-fuel USD/kg 300
MOX-fuel USD/kg 2300
Fast reactor (core), MOX-fuel USD/kg 2300
Fast reactor (blanket), natural uranium and tailings USD/kg 300
Fast reactor (blanket), reprocessed uranium USD/kg 1000
CANDU (natural uranium) USD/kg 120
CANDU (low enriched uranium 1,2 %) USD/kg 175
CANDU (reprocessed uranium) USD/kg 200
SNF reprocessing USD/kg 2000
22
Input data for NFC modelling(2)
Reactor technologies (1)
Parameter LWR
VVER
ALWR CANDU 6
(0,711)
CANDU
(1,2)
BN-800
FR(0.98)
JSFR
Capital costs, USD/kW 3600 3600 3000 3000 LWR+25% LWR+25%
Fixed costs, USD/MW 69,3 69,3 55 55 69,3 69,3
Variable costs, USD/MW*h 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50
Thermal power, MW 3030 4410 2064 2064 2100 3570
Output, MW(e) 1000 1500 728 728 870 1500
Efficiency 0,33 0,34014 0,35 0,35 0,4143 0,42017
Load factor, % 80 90 90 80 85
Time factor 0,85
In-house loads 0,06 0,06 0,06 0,1
Construction period, years 6 6 5 5 7 7
Lifetime, years 45, 60 60 30 30 60 60
23
Input data for NFC modelling(3)
Reactor technologies (2)
Parameter LWR
VVER
ALWR CANDU 6
(0,711)
CANDU
(1,2)
CANDU
(ReU)
BN-800
FR(0.98)
JSFR
FR(1.2)
Make-up, tHM 18,25
8
21,462 88 31 52
Core - - - - 9,34 6,53
Axial blanket - - - - 4,06 8,05
Radial blanket - - - - 3,89 6,10
First load, tHM 70,74
2
129,36
0
88 88 88
Core - - - - 12,6 54,46
Axial blanket - - - - 5,5 54.77
Radial blanket - - - - 6,2 42,32
Average burnup, GW×d/t 49 60 7,5 22 13
Core - - - - 65,9 151,448
Axial blanket - - - - 4,8 11,828
Radial blanket - - - - 4,2 3,807
24
Input data for NFC modelling (4)
Reactor technologies (4)
Parameter LWR
VVER
ALWR CANDU 6
(0,711)
CANDU
(1,2)
BN-800
FR(0.98)
JSFR
FR(1.2)
Enrichment of make-up fuel, % 4,32 5 0,711 1,2
Core - - - - Pu(21,8) Pu(13,28)
Axial blanket - - - - Deplet. U Deplet. U
Radial blanket - - - - Deplet. U Deplet. U
Depleted uranium , % 0,25 0,25 - 0,25
Comparing NFC options
Share of nuclear generation in the energy mix
Availability of uranium resources
Comparing NFC options
SNF accumulation Accumulation of reprocessing products
27
Conclusions Modeling Results
• 10 – 20% energy generation consumption can be covered by own
hydrocarbon mining;
• The coal reserves are sufficient for more than 400 years. But reserves are
difficult to access and they need substantial investments;
• Thermal power plants – need for new builds;
• The hydro resources are exhausted. Essential growth of hydro energy is
not available till 2100.
• The wind generation is limited by geographic location and have a low
total capacity. Need for stand-by power for compensating generation. The
maximum wind power generation will not be over 10 % till 2100
• Total technical available level of the renewable energy is no more than
16 % for economic aspects;
• The solar energy and other renewable generation will not prevail as
compared with basic conventional generation
Conclusions
• In all NFC options considered natural uranium resources are completely depleted by the end of 21 – beginning of 22 century (using only domestic uranium).
• The significant decrease in nuclear generation falls within 2070s. In case of once-through NFC with light water reactors, including ALWR, nuclear generation stops functioning in 2090-2100.
• Introduction of heavy water reactors running on natural uranium (HWR NU) doesn’t have significant impact on uranium resources owing to low HWRs share. Heavy water reactors on low enriched uranium (HWR 1,2) shift complete depletion of uranium resources by 15-20 years beyond 2100 with significant share in nuclear generation maintained at 50% almost till 2080.
Conclusions
• The partial closure of NFC with heavy water reactors on regenerated uranium (HWR ReU) doesn’t have significant impact on the natural uranium depletion rate in the period till 2080-2090. This is accounted for by the low HWR share, owing to high cost of reprocessing technologies, until the uranium resources are exhausted by light water reactors. However, further use of uranium allows maintaining nuclear power beyond 2100.
Conclusions
• Introduction of fast neutron technologies may start earlier subject to significant rise in price of natural uranium, cheapening of SNF reprocessing technologies and overall cost of fast reactors, as well as in case of SNF storage capacities being limited or the cost of relevant facilities is significantly increased.
• Hence, the most effective use of uranium resources could be observed in INES option with NFC based on heavy water reactors running on low enriched uranium (HWR 1,2%): in this case uranium reserves are due to be depleted beyond 2100. At the same time, this NFC features the highest (among the options considered) amount of SNF (about 52 700 tHM) accumulated by the end of the projected period.
Conclusions
• In both options of closed NFC fast reactors, along with the required infrastructure, start being commissioned after natural uranium resources are depleted. In this case, regardless of natural uranium depletion, nuclear power does not only continue to operate till 2100 but also has development prospects for the next century. The prospects for nuclear power existence and development beyond 21 century (using only domestic reserves) are true only for closed NFC based on fast neutron reactors – both with BR < 1 and BR > 1. Both options of closed NFC have near to the best value of levelized cost of electricity.
32
Thank you for your attention!