Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

1

ILC R&D Program

Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program ManagerOffice of High Energy Physics

Office of Science

March 8-9, 2005

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

Goal and Priority

Goal: Carry out the U.S. preconstruction R&D required to position the ILC for the start of construction.

This means: Focus on improved performance Focus on establishing an international management

structure/laboratory to build and run ILC Focus on reducing cost! Focus on bringing ILC to the U.S.

Priority: Very High!!!

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

International Status

In FY04 ICFA’s ILC Technical Review Panel’s R-1 goals were met by both the warm and cold designs. Therefore, the ILC could be built with either technology.

In FY04 the USLCSG completed a comparative design and cost study of a cold and warm ILC design – positioning the U.S. to go either way.

In FY04 the ILCSC’s International Technology Recommendation Panel (ITRP) recommended that the ILC be built using cold technology.

ITRP recommended the cold technology, not the DESY design.

A new conceptual design must be done using the best technology from both the cold and warm designs.

The ITRP urged a strong R&D program directed at increasing Ez in

superconducting rf cavities.

ICFA approved an organizational structure for the international ILC international organization, the Global Design Effort, to manage the preconstruction R&D.

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

Linear Collider – Global Organization

Organization Chart – The Global Design Effort

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

Cost Model - Preconstruction R&D Period

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

Schedule Model for the ILC

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

ILC – International Issues

Making the GDE operational – ASAP

Barish has accepted

GDE Central Office site & team – where & when?

Organize work packages

R&D Plan – for how many years? – U.S. Govt. has to say!

Conceptual Design – Need to prepare an R&D Plan

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

ILC America Status

Draft R&D Plan done – the cap is gone!

ILC America organization – In progress!

U.S. well positioned to proceed with a cold design

Developing work packages

Paul Grannis to be DOE Program Manager!!

U.S. laboratories- - An impression: moving ahead in all

directions!!!!

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

ILC America Issues

Making ILC America operational – ASAP (July 05?)

− DOE/NSF Approval of organizational Structure

− Director Selection – ASAP (the person in charge!)

ILC America contribution to global R&D Plan

− U.S. Govt. must set the time scale what kind of R&D Plan!

Bridging FY06 at SLAC:

− $8.5M to SLAC, $8.5M to Fermilab, $8.0M in DOE

− SLAC ILC in-house funds in FY05 = $15.2M

− To avoid losing large piece of team in FY06, need ~$6.5M of the $8M in Washington – Unlikely!!!

Office of Science

U.S. Department of Energy

ILC America Funding Profile

FY 99 – 03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07

DOE $19.2/yr 19.6 23.3 25.0 35.0DOE HQ - - - 8.0 35.0 FNAL 3.0/yr 3.0 6.4 8.5 ?SLAC 16.2/yr 14.2 15.2 8.5 ?BNL ? .3 .4 ? ?LBNL ? .7 .3 ? ?LLNL ? 1.0 .3 ? ?

TJNAF et al - - - ? ? University - .4 .7 ? ?

FNAL Per DOE 3.0 6.0 8.5 ?FNAL per Stanfield 2.8 6.9 8.8 ?FNAL per Internal budget (M.P.) 3.0 8.9 11.8 12.2