office of special education programs u.s. department of education grant performance report for...

41
Office of Special Education Programs Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009 FY 2009

Upload: kimberly-terry

Post on 02-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Office of Special Education ProgramsOffice of Special Education Programs

U.S. Department of EducationU.S. Department of Education

GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORTGRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT

FORFOR

CONTINUATION FUNDING CONTINUATION FUNDING

FY 2009FY 2009

Page 2: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Annual Grant Performance Annual Grant Performance ReportReport

An annual report of your activities and An annual report of your activities and performance in meeting the approved performance in meeting the approved objectives of the projectobjectives of the project

Required for all active grants, including Required for all active grants, including those in no cost extensionthose in no cost extension

OSEP reviews the report to determine if OSEP reviews the report to determine if substantial progress has been in order substantial progress has been in order to receive continued funding to receive continued funding

Page 3: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

OverviewOverview

Recognize strong project objectives that can be associated with high quality performance measures

Develop high-quality, measurable performance measures that maximize the potential for meaningful data reporting

Complete the ED Grant Performance Report (ED 524B)

Page 4: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

Why Is This Important?Why Is This Important?

High quality objectives and High quality objectives and measures …measures …

Make it easier for you to measure your Make it easier for you to measure your progressprogress

Allow you to report progress easily and Allow you to report progress easily and quantitativelyquantitatively

Allow OSEP staff to gather evidence of Allow OSEP staff to gather evidence of program effectivenessprogram effectiveness

Page 5: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

Goal – Objectives - MeasuresGoal – Objectives - Measures

Perform ance M easuresH o w yo u m e a su re yo u r p ro g ress tow a rd m ee tin g yo u r o b jec tives

(P ro g ra m /G P R A , P ro je c t)

Project ObjectivesW h at you r p ro je ct is d o ing to su pp o rt th e o ve ra ll p ro g ra m g o a l

(F o u nd in yo u r ap p lica tio n )

Program Goal

Page 6: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Project ObjectivesProject Objectives

What are you trying to accomplish?

Page 7: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

High Quality Project High Quality Project ObjectivesObjectives

Relevance

How relevant is the project objective to the overall goal of the program and/or the goal of your project?

Applicability

How applicable is the project objective to the specific activities that are being conducted through your particular project?

Page 8: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

High Quality Project High Quality Project ObjectivesObjectives

Focus

How focused is the project objective?

Measurability

Are there concepts in the project objective that lend themselves to measurement? If so, is measurement feasible?

Page 9: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Project Objectives -- Project Objectives -- ExamplesExamples

Recruit and retain high quality studentsRecruit and retain high quality students

Implement a high-quality personnel Implement a high-quality personnel development program that is aligned to development program that is aligned to State and national professional State and national professional organization standardsorganization standards

Prepare highly qualified personnel to Prepare highly qualified personnel to serve young children with disabilities serve young children with disabilities and their familiesand their families

Page 10: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Performance MeasuresPerformance Measures

How are you measuring your progress in meeting your

objectives?

Page 11: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

Performance MeasuresPerformance Measures

Measurable indicator used to determine Measurable indicator used to determine how well objectives are being met. how well objectives are being met.

How will progress be assessed?

How much progress will constitute success?

How will it be known if an objective or part of an objective has been achieved?

Page 12: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

Performance MeasuresPerformance Measures

Perform ance M easure1a

Perform ance M easure1b

Perform ance M easure1c

Project Objective1

Page 13: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

Types of Performance Types of Performance MeasuresMeasures

ProgramMeasures established by OSEP for the

personnel development program. These include measures established for reporting to Congress under the Government Performance and Results Act

Page 14: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Personnel Development PROGRAM Performance Measures

• Program Performance Measure #1: Percentage of projects that incorporate evidence-based practices in the curriculum.

• Program Performance Measure #2: The percentage of scholars who exit training programs prior to completion due to poor academic performance.     

• Program Performance Measure #3: The percentage of degree/certification recipients employed upon program completion who are working in the area(s) for which they were trained.   

• Program Performance Measure #4: The percentage of degree/certification recipients employed upon program completion who are working in the area(s) in which they were trained and who are fully qualified under IDEA and meet any additional State requirements that may exist.

• Program Performance Measure #5: The percentage of degree/certification recipients who maintain employment for three or more years in the area(s) for which they were trained and who are fully qualified under IDEA.

• Program Performance Measure #6: The percentage of funds expended on scholars who drop out of programs because of: 1) poor academic performance; or 2) scholarship support being terminated when the Federal grant to their institution ends.

Page 15: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

Types of Performance Types of Performance MeasuresMeasures

Project

Measures that the grantee establishes to meet their project objectives

Project performance measures can address both the process of working towards an objective and the outcome related to meeting the objective

Ensure a mix of both process and outcome measures

Page 16: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

High Quality Performance High Quality Performance MeasuresMeasures

High quality performance measures showHigh quality performance measures show

WhatWhat will change will change

How muchHow much change you expect change you expect

WhoWho will achieve the change will achieve the change

WhenWhen the change will take place the change will take place

Page 17: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Project Performance Project Performance Measure ExamplesMeasure Examples

Process measure (e.g.) (e.g.)

Project staff (Project staff (who) will implement 4 () will implement 4 (how how muchmuch)) targeted recruitment activities targeted recruitment activities ((what what ) during each of the first and third ) during each of the first and third years of the grant (years of the grant (when))

Page 18: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Project Performance Project Performance Measure ExamplesMeasure Examples

Outcome measure (e.g.)

Inquiries from potential candidates Inquiries from potential candidates (who)(who) about the program about the program (what)(what) will increase will increase 20% from previous recruitment efforts 20% from previous recruitment efforts (how much)(how much) during the first and third during the first and third years of the grant years of the grant (when)(when)

Page 19: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Project Performance Project Performance Measure ExamplesMeasure Examples

Outcome measure (e.g.)

At the end of their program At the end of their program (when),(when), 90% 90% of scholars of scholars (who)(who) will demonstrate will demonstrate advanced critical reflection skills advanced critical reflection skills (what)(what) by achieving a proficiency score of at by achieving a proficiency score of at least 3 on a 4 point rubric (least 3 on a 4 point rubric (how muchhow much))

Page 20: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Project Performance Project Performance Measure ExampleMeasure Example

Process measure (e.g.) (e.g.)

By the end of the project period By the end of the project period (when),(when), project staff project staff (who)(who) will present on will present on activities and outcomes of the project activities and outcomes of the project (what)(what) at a minimum of 3 state and at a minimum of 3 state and national meetings national meetings (how much).(how much).

Page 21: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

Common ProblemsCommon Problems Activities are NOT performance Activities are NOT performance

measuresmeasures

If the best response is “Yes, we did If the best response is “Yes, we did that,” it is likely an activity (that,” it is likely an activity (notnot a a performance measure)performance measure)

Activities:Activities:

Establish a mentoring programEstablish a mentoring program

Hold an advisory board meetingHold an advisory board meeting

Process students’ stipends Process students’ stipends

Page 22: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

Common ProblemsCommon Problems

Performance measures need to be Performance measures need to be measurablemeasurable

Not measurableNot measurable

Collaborative partnerships will be Collaborative partnerships will be maintainedmaintained

Evaluation will gauge students’ content Evaluation will gauge students’ content proficiency and project effectivenessproficiency and project effectiveness

To increase the sustainability of the To increase the sustainability of the professional development modelprofessional development model

Page 23: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Taken from the Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University

O S

E P

SummarySummary

Projects should have a few clear Projects should have a few clear objectives that explain what the objectives that explain what the project is doing to support the overall project is doing to support the overall goalgoal

Each objective should have a few, Each objective should have a few, specific performance measures to specific performance measures to demonstrate how progress toward demonstrate how progress toward meeting the objective will be measured meeting the objective will be measured

Page 24: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Completing the 524BCompleting the 524B

The ED 524B is a required reporting The ED 524B is a required reporting form with specific instructions.form with specific instructions.

The form is used by all ED grants and The form is used by all ED grants and has been approved by the Office of has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Management and Budget (OMB). Project Directors must follow the Project Directors must follow the directions listed in the Dear Colleague directions listed in the Dear Colleague letter and ED 524B Instructions letter and ED 524B Instructions provided by OSEPprovided by OSEP

Page 25: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009
Page 26: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Reporting Period:

For first year grants, the date is the beginning of the project year to 30 days before the due date.

For grants in years 2-4, it is the date from the end of the previous reporting period to 30 days before the due date.

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTSANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS

Page 27: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTSANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS

Budget Expenditures:

Report the expenditures during the “Reporting Period.” Must be data or

information from the business or grants office.

Page 28: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Signatory must have authority to sign on behalf of the institution since the grant is from the Department to the institution and not to an individual.

Performance Measure Status:

This will be checked “No” since OSEP is asking for data for the reporting period, not for the budget period.

The date entered here will be the due date for your Final Performance Report; which is 90 days after the end of the grant.

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTSANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS

Page 29: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

OMB No. 1890-0004Exp. 10-31-2007

U.S. Department of Education

Grant Performance Report (ED 524B)Executive Summary

(See Instructions)

*** Provide highlights of the project's activities and the extent to which the expected outcomes and performance measures were achieved during the reporting period. Do NOT include the project abstract.

PR/ Number # (11 characters)_______

ED 524BPage 2 of 11

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEETEXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET

Page 30: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

PROJECT STATUS CHARTPROJECT STATUS CHART

Page 31: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Enter one of the project’s objectives; on subsequent pages, you will enter additional project objectives as submitted in your grant application.

PROJECT STATUS CHARTPROJECT STATUS CHART

Page 32: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Enter your PROJECT performance measures that show you are measuring progress toward meeting the objective.

In addition, enter PROGRAM performance measures that align with the objective.

PROJECT STATUS CHARTPROJECT STATUS CHART

Page 33: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Here you identify if the performance measure is a project measure, “PROJ,” or a program measure, “PRGM.”

Note:

Program Measures refer to OSEP Measures required in all personnel development grants. Project Measures are unique to your grant.

PROJECT STATUS CHARTPROJECT STATUS CHART

Page 34: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Depending on your measure, enter either a raw number or a ratio and percentage.

PROJECT STATUS CHARTPROJECT STATUS CHART

QUANTITATIVE DATAQUANTITATIVE DATA

In this area of the page, enter information to explain the quantitative data, as well as activities the project engaged in to meet the objective.

Page 35: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

QUALITATIVE DATAQUALITATIVE DATA

If measure requires the collection of qualitative data, then enter “N/A” under the Raw Number and Percentage columns.

N/A N/A N/A N/A

In this area of the page, report qualitative data along with other information you wish to report regarding the identified objective.

PROJECT STATUS CHARTPROJECT STATUS CHART

Page 36: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

1.a. Performance Measure Measure Type Quantitative Data

Percentage of projects that incorporate evidence-based practices in the curriculum. (Measure #1)

PROG Target Actual Performance Data

Raw Number Ratio %

Raw Number Ratio %

/NA

/NA

1.b. Performance Measure Measure Type Quantitative Data

Upon completion of a seminar on family partnerships, each cohort of scholars will rate the quality and usefulness of the seminar as 4.5 or greater on a 5-point scale.

PROJ Target Actual Performance Data

Raw Number Ratio %

Raw Number Ratio %

4.5 /

4.0 /

1.c. Performance Measure Measure Type Quantitative Data

At the midpoint of scholars’ programs, 85% of scholars will demonstrate at least satisfactory knowledge of working with young children with disabilities and their families by scoring a minimum of 75 (out of 100) on a program designed assessment.

PROJ Target Actual Performance Data

Raw Number Ratio %

Raw Number Ratio %

85 0

Implement a high quality personnel development program that is aligned to State and national professional organization standards.

Page 37: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Explanation of Progress (Include Qualitative Data and Data Collection Information)

(1a) The project curriculum is based on the State’s personnel standards which are consistent with those of the Division for Early Childhood and the National Association for the Education of Young Children. All courses were approved by the Curriculum Committee in the Graduate School of Education for our NCATE accreditation process. Project staff and the Advisory Committee will review the courses annually to ensure that they contain current evidence-based practices. In addition, the project staff is working on a process to select and evaluate field placements. The Advisory Committee will review this process.

 

(1b) Since this grant is designed with a focus on strengthening family partnerships, a required seminar on family partnerships was identified for more in-depth evaluation. The seminar was offered during the Fall 2008 semester. Project staff recruited families through the State PTI as well as PTI staff to present on their experiences. Data from the survey will be used to inform the content of other courses as well as future seminars.

 

(1c) Project staff will design an assessment to measure students’ progress in meeting personnel standards aligned to the courses offered in the first year of their program. This data will be used to inform the content of other courses in the program as well as practicum experiences to ensure that students are receiving a high quality personnel development program. Results of the data will also be used to make adjustment to the first year program for the second cohort of students.

Implement a high quality personnel development program that is aligned to State and national professional organization standards.

Page 38: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Final Page of the ReportFinal Page of the Report

Section B: Refer to the instructions for Section B in the ED 524B Instructions

Section C: Include additional information (recruitment material, syllabi, evaluation instruments, journal articles)

Page 39: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Submitting the 524BSubmitting the 524B

Submit the 524B at http://e-Grants.ed.gov

Signed ED 524B Cover Sheet must be faxed to Kimberly Savoy-Brown at 202-245-7635

Two conditions require hard copy or email submission rather than submission through e-Grants – Grants in no-cost extension

Grants that have been forward funded

Page 40: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

O S

E P

Submitting the 524BSubmitting the 524B

Regular postal service:

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs

Attn: Kimberly Savoy-Brown, PCP – Room 5060

400 Maryland Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20202

Hand delivery or parcel service:

U.S. Department of Education

Attn: Kimberly Savoy-Brown, Mail Stop 255

LBJ Basement Level 1

400 Maryland Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20202

Page 41: Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009

Contact your OSEP Project Contact your OSEP Project Officer with any questions!Officer with any questions!Contact your OSEP Project Contact your OSEP Project Officer with any questions!Officer with any questions!

Due Date: April 24, 2009Due Date: April 24, 2009

Thank You!Thank You!