office of the pupblic information officer: delhi

OFFICE OF THE PUPBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER: DELHI

DIRECTORATE OF PROSECTUION: DELHI

GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI

F.No. ID No.3893/RTI-5/DOP/2013/ Dated:

Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by

Shri Mukesh Garg, R/o 528/6, Gali No.5, Vishwas Nagar, Shahdara,

Delhi-110032, received from Public Information Officer cum Addl.

Dy. Commissioner of Police, North East District, Delhi for seeking

information under Right to Information Act-2005.

The contents of the application may be looked into and the

information sought by the applicant on point No.3, 4, & 5 as per

available record may be furnished to the undersigned within five

days from the receipt of this communication for onward submission

to the applicant.

.

+(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer,

Asstt. Public Prosecutor

Directorate of Prosecution,

To,

Reader to C.P./In-Charge, Distt. North East, Karkardooma Courts

Complex, Delhi.

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION: DELHI



The Public Information Officer/

Addl. Dy. Commissioner,

Distt. North East, Seelampur,

Delhi.

The Public Information Officer/

East Delhi Municipal Corporation,

Civil Centre, Jawahar Lal Nehru

Marg, New Delhi.

For Point No.1,2,3,4, & 11 For Point No.5, 6 & 7

Sub:- Transfer of application of Shri Ahsan Ali, r/o 219, Gali No.7, near

Ambedkar University, Kardampuri Extension, Delhi-110094.

The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri

Shri Ahsan Ali, r/o 219, Gali No.7, near Ambedkar University,

Kardampuri Extension, Delhi-110094 under Right to Information

Act-2005.

1. On going through the contents of application, it has been

observed that the information sought in the letter of the

applicant does not pertain to this department.

1. The application of the applicant is accordingly transferred to

your office u/s 3 of Section 6 of Right to Information Act-

2005 with the request that the information sought by the

applicant may be furnished to the applicant directly.

2. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction it may please be

further transferred to the public authority to which the subject

matter is more closely connected.

(Balbir Singh)




Encl. as above.

Copy for information to:-

Shri Ahsan Ali, r/o 219, Gali No.7, near Ambedkar University,

Kardampuri Extension, Delhi-110094under Right to Information Act-

2005 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority

for future correspondence.

(Balbir Singh)


Asstt. Public Prosecutor,





Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by

Shri Ram Pal, A-Block, Pushta Road, West Karawal Nagar, Delhi-

110094 under Right to Information Act-2005 received in the office of

Public Information Officer. The information sought by the applicant

pertains to your office.

The contents of the letter may be gone through and information

sought in the application matter may be forwarded within five days

from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward

submission to the applicant.

(Balbir Singh)


Addl. Public Prosecutor

APIO through concerned through Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge,

Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi.

OF THE PUPBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER: DELHI

DIRECTORATE OF PROSECTUION: DELHI GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI

F.No. ID No.3914 /RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, West District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar, Subzi Mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar, Subzi mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 under Right to Information Act-2005.

1. On going through the contents of application, it has been observed that the information sought in the letter of the applicant does not pertain to this department.

2. The application of the applicant is accordingly transferred to your office u/s 3 of Section 6 of Right to Information Act-2005 with the request that the information sought by the applicant may be furnished to the applicant directly.

3. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is more closely connected.

(Balbir Singh) Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar, Subzi Mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.

(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution,




F.No. ID No.3305/RTI-05/DOP/ Dated:

To,

Shri Abhishek Verma,

Jail No.4, Tihar Prisons,

New Delhi-110064.

Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed under Right to

Information Act-2005, in the office of CPIO, of this Department, and

the relevant information as sought by you on the various points as per

available record is as under:-

1. Approximately 17 Courts appearances have been made by Shri

Rajiv Mohan of the cases of CBI from September-2012 to till

20th

2. Approximately 150 Court appearances have been made by Shri

Rajiv Mohan in various Courts in Delhi from February-2006 to

till 20

May 2013.

th

3. The information is personal in nature and cannot be furnished

under Right to Information Act-2005.

May 2013.

4. The information contains 04 pages, and copies of the same can

be obtained by depositing an amount of Rs.8/- (Rs.2/- per page)

as per provisions of Right to Information Act-2005.

5. The information is personal in nature and the officer has

requested not to disclose the same.

6. This department is not having any panel of Special Public

Prosecutors.

7. The information sought does not pertain to this department and

applicant is advised to approach CBI for the required

information.

8. As per record, no criminal or civil case or departmental

enquiries is being faced by Shri Rajiv Mohan.

(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer/


1St

Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act-2005.

Chief Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Distt. North, Room

No.174, Tis Hazari Courts Complex, Delhi-110054.

on 29.04.013, in the office of Public Information Officer, the

information on the relevant points has been called for from the

concerned authorities and as per available records the same is as

under:-

In the case in question the order of Shri Rakesh Tiwari, ASJ,

was opined for challenging in appeal. As per acquittal report dated

18.12.2010, the opinion that the case is fit for appeal was given by

Shri Sanjay Singh, Addl. P.P. who was posted in the respective Court

of ASJ as regular prosecutor was on medical leave.

In pursuance of letter No.F.3/Law/39/2011/0005151772, dated

22.02.2011, of Asstt. Legal Advisor, it is informed that appeal in this

case was recommended for filing and file was sent to D.C.P., Outer

District, for necessary action:-

(B.S.KAIN)



1St








To,

Smt.Saraswati Bhardwaj,

238, New Lyallpur,

Krishan Nagar,

Delhi-110051.



Information Act-2005, on 29.04.013, in the office of Public

Information Officer, Saket District Courts, Saket New Delhi, received

in the office of undersigned on 01.05.2013 upon transfer it is informed

that the information has been called from the concerned functionary

and as per available records, point wise information is under:-

available with this department.

1. 52 Naib Courts were posted in Prosecution Branch, at Saket

Court Complex, South Distt. and 46 Naib Courts were posted in

Prosecution Branch at Saket Court Complex, in South East

District as on 01.03.2012. 13 Naib Courts of South East Distt.

were posted in Session Courts on 01.03.2012.




District as on 08.04.2012.

3. All Naib Courts of Prosecution Branch works under Chief

Prosecutor/In-Charge of concerned District Courts and their

duty hours are from 10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m.

4. The information sought by you contains 27 pages. You may

obtain copies of the said documents after depositing a fee of

Rs.54/- (Rs.2/- per page) as per provisions of Right to

Information Act-2005.

(B.S.KAIN)



1St








To,

Shri Bharat Aggarwal,

32/3, South Civil Lines,

Arya Samaj Road,

P.S. Civil Lines,

Muzaffar Nagar, U.P.




Information Officer, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, New

Delhi, received in the office of undersigned on 15.05.2013 upon

transfer from Dy. Secretary (Home), Home (Police-II) Department,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi it is informed that the position is explained as

under:-

The information sought by the applicant is vague and

multifarious in nature and applicant has not mentioned any specific FIR

No. or any case No. instituted against Madan lal Verma, s/o Shri

Ramesh Chand Verma and Gaurav Verma @ Tinkoo, Punit Verma @

Pintoo, Amit Verma s/o Shri Madan Lal Verma, r/o H.No.32/1, 32/2,

Arya Samaj Road, South Civil Lines, Muzaffar Nagar, Pargana & Tehsil,

Sadar Zila, Muzaffar Nagar, U.P. and in the absence of same the

information cannot be provided by this office. Moreover, this

department is not the custodian of the information sought by the

applicant. The applicant may be advised to approach concerned Public

Authority i.e. District Authorities Muzaffar Nagar, U.P. mentioning

specific case/Suit No. for obtaining the information about the concerned

persons.

(B.S.KAIN)



1St








To,

Smt. Parveen Latha Awasthy,

B-39, Jagatpuri,

Delhi.


With reference to your application filed in the office of Public

Information Officer, District Courts, Karkardooma, Delhi, and

received on transfer to the Public Information Officer of this

department on the subject cited above, the information has been

called for from the concerned functionaries and as per available in

record of this department, information as sought by you is as under:-

“As per office record Case FIR No.542/06 u/s 498-A/406/34, P.S.

Krishna Nagar in the matter of State v/s Vinay Awasthi & Ors.,

acquittal report was sent to Pr. Secretary, Law, Judicial &

Legislative Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide No.1323/DOP/2012,

dated 23.04.2012 and the file was received back with the remarks as

“ Not fit for appeal” and same was sent to Dy. Commissioner of

Police, East District, vide No.2150/DOP dated 15.05.2012”.

(B.S.KAIN)

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER/

ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

1ST








Shri Rajesh Kumar, s/o Shri Dhara Singh, r/o A-72, Swarn Park,

Nangloi, Delhi-110041, under Right to Information Act-2005

received in the office of Public Information Officer. The information

sought by the applicant pertains to your office.





(Balbir Singh)



APIO through concerned through Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge, Rohini

Courts Complex, Delhi.



F.No. ID No.3160/RTI-2005/DOP/2013/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Lal

Bahadur, H.No.61, Saraswati Vihar, Nawab Garh Road, Dak Pathar, Dehradun,

Uttrakhad, under Right to Information Act-2005 for seeking information on under

Right to Information Act-2005.

The contents of the letter may be gone through and information in this matter

may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned

for onward submission to the applicant.

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer,

Addl. Public Prosecutor.

Asstt. Public Information Officer through Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge, Rohini Courts Complex, Directorate of Prosecution.





To,


Tihar Jail No.4,

Jail Road,

New Delhi-110054.


With reference to your application filed in the office of Chief

Public Information Officer, Home (Police-II) Department, and




record of this department, on point No. 2, 3 & 4, information as

sought by you is as under:-

2. (i) & (ii) & (iii). No extra remuneration is paid for conducting

cases of Delhi Police as the officer is an employee of Govt. of NCT

of Delhi.

3. (i). An amount of Rs.6.90 lacs have been paid by C.B.I. in case

CBI-RC-2A/ACU-IX/2006 (Navy War Room Leak case).

(ii). No amount has been paid by CBI in case CBI-RC-AC-1-2012-

A-0012 (CBI v/s Abhishek Verma.

4. No extra remuneration is paid for conducting cases of Delhi Govt.

Delhi Police as the officer is an employee of Govt. of NCT of Delhi.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST




Shri Rajiv Mohan, Addl. Public Prosecutor has been withdrawn

from the case due to administrative reasons.

1. Directions were conveyed to Shri Rajiv Mohan, Addl. Public

Prosecutor with the approval of Pr. Secretary (Home) for

assigning Complaint case No.01/2012 of Shri Vivek Garg, v/s

Sheila Dixit & Ors in the Special Judge, ACB vide letter

No.F.8/632/2010/HP-II/1111, dated 19.02.2013 of Deputy

Secretary (Home), Govt. of NCT of Delhi. This case was later

on assigned to Shri R.S.Yadav, Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge,

Rohini Courts Complex with further directions Shri Sanjay

Soni, Addl. Public Prosecutor will assist the officer in the

aforesaid case vide Order No.1344/DOP/2013, dated

29.04.2013.

2. This is an administrative matter and it is not necessary to

consult with the investigation agency for withdrawing or

assigning the case to a particular officer.

3. There is no specified procedure, guidelines, rules & regulation

regarding the removal as well as appointment of Public

Prosecutor from or for a case.

4. There was no charge, complaint or allegations against Shri

Rajiv Mohan, Addl. P.P.

5. The Mobile number of Shri R.S.Yadav, In-Charge/Chief

Prosecutor, Distt. North at Rohini Courts is 98683-94512 and

Mobile Number of Shri Sanjay Soni Addl. Public Prosecutor at

Tis Hazari Courts Delhi 96507-94512.

6. The applicant is advised to obtain copies of letter and order

mentioned at point No.2, which are self explanatory.

7. There is no specific act/law for assigning/removing any officer

from a particular case.

8. There is no specific orders, directions recommendations in the

form of documents related to removal of P.P. from the said

case.

9. The orders are administrative in nature and no file noting is

available in record.

10. No orders/O.M.s, Directions approval, recommendations,

objections with the concerned offices are available in record.

11. As at point 12.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST




12. It is informed that as per report called from the

concerned Assistant Public Prosecutor from the Courts that in

Case FIR No.114/09, PS Model Town, no case has been filed in

the Court. However MHC® of PS Model Town was called with

the status report of the case vide DD No.23 dated 25.04.2013,

who appeared before the concerned officer and submitted that

the case has been cleared as untraced from the office of

concerned ACP and untraced report has been filed in the

Court. However the applicant is liberty to approach the

concerned PS as no final report filed in the court. The MHC®

also produced the photocopy of the same.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Punkit Satija,

C-105, Jail Road,

New Delhi-110064.



Information Officer, of this department on the subject cited above,

the information has been called for from the concerned functionaries

and as per available in record of this department, the point wise

information as sought by you is as under:-

“As per report of Asstt. Public Prosecutor, the case FIR

No.757/99, dated 05.11.1999, P.S. Hari Nagar, u/s 283/290 IPC; it is

informed that the FIR has not been received by Prosecution. The

registers maintained regarding FIRs by the Prosecution Branch has

been checked but no entry for receipt/disposal of said FIR was found

in Registers”.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Priya Gaur,

Advocate,

WZ-23, 3rd

Shadipur,

Floor,

New Delhi-110008.







It is informed that as per report called from the concerned

Assistant Public Prosecutor from the Courts that in Case FIR

No.114/09, PS Model Town, no case has been filed in the Court.

However MHC® of PS Model Town was called with the status report

of the case vide DD No.23 dated 25.04.2013, who appeared before

the concerned officer and submitted that the case has been cleared

as untraced from the office of concerned ACP and untraced report

has been filed in the Court. However the applicant is liberty to

approach the concerned PS as no final report filed in the court. The

MHC® also produced the photocopy of the same.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Deepak Sharma,

Advocate,

Chamber No.85, B.G.S.Block,

Tis Hazari Courts,

Delhi-110054.







1. As per record, no appeal has been preferred against the

order/judgment of acquittal in question by this department.

2. Information sought is matter of record. Moreover, it has

been appreciated by Ld. Trial Court and a particular finding

has been given by it, hence need not to be reiterated.

3. Comments/information sought vide para 3 of the application

is purely a matter of appreciation of Hon’ble Court, whih

has already been done by the Ld. Trial court, hence cannot

be commented upon in the manner, it is sought.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST




.





To,

Shri Ashwani Arora,

r/o 1/641, Loni Road,

Shahdara, Delhi-110032.




the information as per available in record of this department, the


It is informed that information asked by you under Point No.1,3

& 5 is related to an order passed by the Court of Shri G.N.Pandey,

ACMM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 21.08.2012. No record is

available with Pr.Br. NE Distt.

The applicant is advised to obtain the further information from

the Court of Shri G.N.Pandey, ACMM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST







F.No. ID No.1715/RTI-05/DOP/

Dated:

To,

Shri Hukam Singh,

S/o Late Shri Prem Chand,

Village Gokulpur,

Delhi-110094 Nagar, New Delhi.






As regards FIR No.421/83, PS Seemapuri, FIR No.173/87, PS

Yamuna Vihar, FIR No.177/87, PS Yamuna Vihar, & FIR No.35/91, PS

Gukulpuri, it has been informed by the concerned Assistant Public

Prosecutors that these cases are very old and no record is available

with the concerned court. As regards Case FIR No. 358/06, PS

Gukulpuri, has been disposed of by the Court of Dr.Shahabuddin, MM

on 01.06.2009.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST




OFFICE OF THE PUPBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER: DELHI DIRECTORATE OF PROSECTUION: DELHI


F.No. ID No. /RTI-05/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, North District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Deepak Sharma, Advocate, B-85, B.G.S.Blcok, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of Shri Deepak Sharma, Advocate, B-85, B.G.S.Blcok, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005, under Right to Information Act-2005.

2. On going through the contents of application, it has been observed that the information sought on point No.2 in the letter the applicant does not pertain to this department.

3. The application of the applicant is accordingly transferred to your office u/s 3 of Section 6 of Right to Information Act-2005 with the request that the information sought on point No.2 by the applicant may be furnished to the applicant directly.


(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:-

1. Shri Deepak Sharma, Advocate, B-85, B.G.S.Blcok, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005, under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution,





To,

Shri G.D.Parashar,

R/o C-114, First Floor,

Fateh Nagar, New Delhi.






No case FIR No.757/09 dated 05.11.1999, PS Hari Nagar; u/s

283/290 IPC was filed in the concerned Court of PS Hari Nagar.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Madan Gopal Gupta,

S/o Shri B.B.Gupta,

A-17, Vivek Vihar,

Phase-I, Delhi.


In continuation of this office letter of even number dated

25.04.2013, on the subject cited above, the information has been


record of this department, the point wise information as sought by

you is as under:-

1. No appeal in cases pertaining to u/s 498-A/406 IPC with the

area of Distt. Courts complex, Karkardooma i.e. East, North

East & shahdara Distt. has been filed during the period 1st

January 2011 to 10th

2. As regards information on the application of Dr. Samita Gupta

r/o 41, Shalimar Park, Shahdara, Delhi regarding cancellation

of anticipatory bail, of accused Dr.M.G.Gupta in case FIR

No.29/2011 u/s 498-A/406/34, IPC, PS Farash Bazar, on the

recommendations of concerned Prosecuting Officer and In-

Charge/Chief Prosecutor was received in this department vide

Diary No.325/CP/East, dated 07.03.2013 and with further

recommendations through Director of Prosecution was sent to

Pr. Secretary (Law & Judicial) vide Diary No.815/DOP, dated

11.03.2013 and the same was received back with the remarks

as “ Fit for revision” and the file was sent to Dy. Commissioner

of Police, Distt. East vide Diary No.1103/DOP, dated

19.03.2013 for further necessary action at their end.

April 2013.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Birender Sangwan,

Bar Room No.2, IInd Floor,

Rohini Courts,

Delhi-110085.



Information Officer, D.C.P.Office, Pitampura, Delhi on the subject

cited above, the information on points related to this office as per

available record is furnished as under:-

The Naib Courts are deployed in Prosecution Branch by the Dy.

Commissioner of Police of the respective district.

Point No. 4.

There are no specific guidelines in this regard. However the transfer

policy is at the discretion of the D.C.P. Concerned and more over the

transfer of Naib Court from Court to Court is within the purview of

Chief Prosecutor of the district concerned.

Point No. 5.

Police officers posted in MM Courts or session courts are deployed

by the concerned In-Charge/Chief Prosecutor of the District.

Point No.10.

The Naib Court is deployed for duty in the MM Court and Session

Court by the Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge of the Court. The Naib

Court is shifted from one court to another from time to time by the

In-Charge/Chief Prosecutor of Distt.Court. A copy of Naib Courts

deployed for duty at Rohini Courts is attached.

Point No. 11.

So far as the transfer of Naib Court is at the discretion of In-Charge/

Chief Prosecutor concerned and they are transferred from one court

to another court from time to time.

Point No.12.

It relates to Delhi Police.

Point No.13.

Time & Work of police officers deployed in the courts are from 9:30

a.m. to till courts hours.

Point No.14.

Attendance of all police officers posted as naib courts are marked in

the attendance register of concerned Distt. And the same remains in

the custody of concerned Chief Prosecutor.

Point No. 15

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Ms.Rattan Deep Kaur,

13-B, Sector-15-A,

Super Deuxe Flats,

Noida, UP.


In compliance of the orders of 1st

Appellate Authority under

Right to Information Act-2005, the supplementary information is

furnished as under:-

Point No.1.

The photocopies of relevant correspondence contain 05 pages and

copies of the same are enclosed.

Point No.2.



Point No.3.

A complete set of documents containing 24 pages has already been

forwarded by this office vide letter No.DOP/2013/569-570, dated

22.02.2013 in continuation of this office letter No.F.1(1(144)/DOP/2-

13/485-486, dated 22.02.2013.

Point No.4.

The copy of order dated 26.04.2012 and copy of letter No. dated

03.01.2013 containing 2 pages is enclosed.





To,

Ms.Usha Mann,

13-B, Sector-15-A,

Super Deuxe Flats,

Noida, UP.






Point No.1, 2 & 3.



Point No.4.



Point No.5.

The complaint dated 11.02.2011 of Shri Rajiv Vaid, alleging

appearance in Hon’ble High Court of Delhi was marked by Director

of Prosecution to Vigilance Officer of the Department. A copy of

complaint containing 02 pages and copy of the same is enclosed. It

is the internal arrangement of the department to designate an officer

as Vigilance Officer of the department to conduct preliminary inquiry

upon receipt of complaint against an officer/official of the

department. The Vigilance Officer of the department has conducted

preliminary inquiry. The complaint of the officer was received when

the officer was on the strength of the department.

Point No.6.

As per Office Order No.11/21/2007/DOP/HP-II/4706-4716, dated

04.08.2009 from Dy. Secretary (Home), (Photocopy enclosed)

wherein it has been mentioned that the period of absence from

March 2007 to 03.05.2009 will be decided later on which clearly

shows that the officer was absence from duty.

Point No.7 & 8.

No information is sought and clarification if any is not within the

ambit of RTI Act-2005.

Point No.9 & 10.

Photocopy of letter No.F.1(144)/DOP/Estt./2635, dated 05.10.2012

containing 03 pages and copy of letter No.F.11/4/12/DOP/HP-I/1250,

dated 21.09.2012 of Dy. Secretary (Home-I) containing 01 page

whereby this department was requested to send the relevant file

with para-wise comments for placing the same for the perusal of

Hon’ble Lt.Governor, Delhi.

Point No.11.

The Service Book of the officer was forwarded to Home Department

along-with para-wise comments in order to complete the reference

in question as the service book is primary requirement for fixation of

pay of the officer.

Point No.12.

Copy of letter dated 17.08.2012 containing 01 page is enclosed.

(B.S.KAIN)

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER

Addl. Public Prosecutor,

Directorate of Prosecution.

Encl. 16 pages.





To,

Ms.Usha Mann,

13-B, Sector-15-A,

Super Deuxe Flats,

Noida, UP.






Point No.1.

Shri Bhagwan Singh was holding the post of Head of Department/

Head of office from August 2009 to 30.06.2010.

Shri B.S.Joon is holding the post of Head of Department from

01.07.2010 to till date. The officer was also holding the post of Head

of office from 01.07.2010 to 30.09.2010. Thereafter Shri Sanjay Soni

was assigned duties of Head of Office from 01.10.2010 to till date.

Shri S.Roy Biswas, Office Superintendent was holding the post of

DDO in the month of August 2009. Shri M.Raghu AAO,was holding

the post of DDO from 15.10.2009 to 28.02.2011. Shri Sanjay Soni

was assigned the duties of DDO from 03.03.2011 to 27.03.2011. Shri

Unmesh Pahade, Office Superintendent was assigned duties of DDO

from 28.03.2011 to 08.04.2011. Shri R.K. Aggarwal , AAO was

assigned the duties of DDO from 18.05.2011 to 06.01.2013. Shri

Arjesh Kumar, AAO is presently working as DDO of the department

from 07.01.2013 to till date.

Shri S.Roy Biswas Office Superintendent remained posted in this

department from 01.08.2008 to 12.10.2009.

Shri K.S.Dhama, Office Superintendent remained posted in this


Shri Unmesh Pahade, Office Superintendent remained posted in this


Shri Raj Kumar, Office Superintendent is posted in this department

from 08.04.2011 to till.

Point No.2

Copy of order dated 10.07.2010 and 23.09.2011 is enclosed.

Point No.3.

No such file/record is available in this Directorate.

Point No.4, 5 & 6.

No such file or record is available in this Directorate.

Point No.7 & 8.

The photocopy of file as per available records is enclosed.

Point No.9.

(a). 11.06.2008 from PFA to DOP

(b). No communication is available in record.

(c). As above.

(d). 13.08.2012 from Home Department to DOP,

(e). 05.10.2012 from DOP to Home Department,

(f). 07.11.2012 from Home Department to DOP.

(g). 22.12.2012 from DOP to PFA Department.

Point No.10.

The officer upon joining was posted in Anti Corruption Branch of

Directorate of Vigilance, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide order No.1

(144)/DOP/2007/1027-1030, dated 09.04.2007. (Photocopy enclosed.

Point No.11&12.

Photocopy of official note sheet containing 6 pages is enclosed.

Point No.13.

This office is having 05 files available in record and all the files are

numbered 1(144)/DOP/2007, 1(144) DOP/2012 and are personal files

of the officer by name.

(B.S.KAIN)




Encl. 16 pages.

As above.

(d). 13.08.2012.

(e).

With reference to The undersigned has received an application from PIO/Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police-I, North District, Civil Lines, Delhi for furnishing information on point No.2 under Right to Information Act-2005.

1. The information sought by you is not available in this department. The same might be in the judicial file or Police file as cancellation of FIR is in between the Investigation agency and respective Court.

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Copy for information to:- Public Information Officer/Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police-I, North District, Civil Lines, Delhi with reference to letter No.3118/ID No.394/2013/RTI Cell, North District, Delhi dated 11.03.2013 with the request that the required information may be provided from the record of the respective Police Station.




F.No. ID No.2979/RTI-2005/DOP/2013/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Anil Dutt Sharma, D-129, New Seelampur, Delhi, received by transfer from the office of Dy. Secretary ( Admn.)/Public Information Officer, O/o Law Justice & Legislative Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, for seeking information on under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the application of the applicant may kindly be gone through and information in this matter may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



The Reader to P.P., Tis Hazari Courts, In-charge/Chief Prosecutor, Rohini Courts, Patiala House Courts, Saket Courts, Dwarka Courts, Karkardooma Courts, C.P. West District & Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Directorate of Prosecution



F.No. ID No.2788/RTI-2005/DOP/2012/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Punkit

Satija, C-105, Jail Road, New Delhi-110064, under Right to Information Act-2005

received in the office of Public Information Officer, for seeking information on







The In-Charge/CP, West Distt., Tis Hazari, Directorate of Prosecution.



F.No. ID No. 614/RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated:

To,

Ms. Usha Mann,

13-B, Super Deluxe Flats,

Sector-15, NOIDA, U.P.

Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005.


27.02.2013 on the subject cited above, the information sought

contains 04 pages. You are accordingly advised to deposit an amount

of Rs.08/- with the AAO/DDO of this department as per provisions of

Right to Information Act-2005 for providing photocopy of the relevant

documents.

(B.S.KAIN)

Public Information Officer





To,

Ms. Usha Mann,









documents.

(B.S.KAIN)






To,

Ms. Usha Mann,

13-B, Super Deluxe Flats ,




27.02.2013 on the subject cited above, the information sought contain

ns 11 pages. You are accordingly advised to deposit an amount of

Rs.22/- with the AAO/DDO of this department as per provisions of


documents.

(B.S.KAIN)





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated:

To,

Shri Puneet Kumar,

S/o Shri Rajinder Prasad Vashisth,

8/75, Sector-3, Rajender Nagar,

Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, U.P.


With reference to your application filed in the office

undersigned on the subject cited above, the point wise information as

per available records is as under:-

.

1. A complaint dated 06.08.2012 against Shri Naveen Gaur, Head

Constable r/o F-4/123-124, Sector-16, Rohini, Delhi was

received in this office. The same was sent to In-charge/Chief

Prosecutor of the concerned court for comments.

2. Preliminary investigations were conducted. To conduct any kind

of raids on the basis of complaints is not in the jurisdiction of

this department.

3. No specific instructions are available on record.

4. Shri Naveen Gaur is presently posted in North West district of

Rohini Courts Complex. No specific information about his

previous posting in this Court is available in this department.

5. No such record is available in this department and as per CCS

(Conduct) Rules only Gazetted Officers are required to furnish

Annual Property Returns.

(B.S.KAIN)



Designation of the 1st

Chief Prosecutor (North), Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.




F.No. ID No.1840/RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated:

To,

Shri Tarkeshwar Yadav,

S/o Late Shri Heera Lal Yadav,

M-95, Gali No.6, Shastri Nagar,

Delhi-110052.

Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005.


Information Pfficer/Addl. Dy.Commissioner, North District, Delhi and

transferred to the undersigned on 06.04.2013 the subject cited above,

the information as per available records is as under:-

.

The case Diary is a privileged communication in between the

State and Investigation Agency and not in the ambit of Right

to Information Act-2005. Hon’ble Court can only see the

Case Diary.




6. Prosecutor2on the , tof Hon’ble Justice of Fast Track Court, on

the subject cited above, the information sought by you is a

privileged communication in between the State and Investigation

agency and cannot be disclosed as under Right to Information

Act-2005 and as per orders of Hon’ble Trial Court. Section

228-A of Code of Criminal Procedure, reads as under.

If after such consideration, and hearing as aforesaid, the Judge is

of the opinion that there is ground of presuming that the accused has

committed an which, is not exclusively triable by the Court of Session,

he may, frame a charge against the accused and, by order, transfer the

case for trial to Chief Judicial Magistrate (or any other Judicial

Magistrate of the first class and direct the accused to appear before the

Chief Judicial Magistrate, or, as the case may be, the Judicial

Magistrate of the first class on such date as he deem fit, and thereupon

such Magistrate) shall try the offence in accordance with the procedure

for the trial of Warrant cases instituted on a Police report.

(B.S.KAIN)






++ OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION: DELHI


F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, Sui Juris India, 507, Rohit House, Tolstoy Marg, Cannuaght Place, New Delhi-110001. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application received in the office in the office of

undersigned on the subject cited above, the position of the information sought by

you on points as per available record is as under:-

This office is not the custodian of the information sought by you. You

are advised to apply to the concerned Public Authority/Public Information

Officer in the department in accordance with the instructions contained in

O.M.No. dated 24.09.2010 of Govt. of India, Department of Personnel &

Training.

(B.S.KAIN)

Public Information Officer Addl. Public Prosecutor,






F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Smt. Usha Mann, H.No.13, Super Deluxe Flats, Sector-15-A, Noida-201301. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 18.01.2013, in the name of Public

Information Officer, office of Chief Secretary, Delhi and received in this office on

30.01.2013, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you as per

available record in this office is as under:-

It is informed that Shri Suresh Chand Sharma, Chief Prosecutor

Central Distt. has been nominated as Nodal Officer of the department in all

Misc. matters as per record.

(B.S.KAIN)







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2013/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Mrs. Pooja, r/o Plot No.3 A, 1st

Floor, Yograj Colony, Near Nirankari Sarover, Delhi received from the office of Public Information Officer, North District, Civil Lines, Delhi for seeking information on point No.2 under Right to Information Act-2005.

The contents of the letter may be gone through and information in this matter may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



The Reader to PP,Delhi. Directorate of Prosecution



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an orders of the 1st

No.41, 2

Appellate Authority issued an application of Shri Yogesh Kumar,c/o Pratidhi, Room

nd

Delhi-110092. under Right to Information Act-2005. floor, Shakarpur Police StationComplex, Pushta Road, Ramesh Park,

The appeal is remanded back to the Public Information Officer for furnishing information on Point No.2 & 3. The information on point No.3 pertains to your office. The contents of the aforesaid order may kindly be looked into and supplementary information in this matter may be forwarded to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



Reader to DOP, Directorate of Prosecution

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION: DELHI GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI

F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Hari Ram, No.2639/East, P.S.Pandav Nagar, Delhi, seeking information of cases relating Excise Act under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the letter may be gone through and information in this matter may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



The APIO, Through C.P./Incharge, Karkardooma Courts, Directorate of Prosecution



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Amrik Singh, 10196/15, Jhandewalan Mandir, New Delhi-110055. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 06.11.2012, in the office of PIO, Delhi Police, North District, received in this office on 04.12.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you as per available record in this office is as under:-

It is informed that no copy of any decision or order in the FIR No.544/92 dated 28.04.1992 of Hon’ble Court is available in this office and the same is within the custody of appropriate Court. In case any copy or order of decision is desired, you are advised to apply for certified copy in the appropriate Court.

(B.S.KAIN) Public Information Officer

Addl. Public Prosecutor, Designation of the 1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Tirath Ram, C/o DG-III/217, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 26.10.2012, in the office of PIO, Delhi Police, received in this office on 07.12.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you on point No. 8 as per available record in this office is as under:-

It is informed that there is no Appellate Authority in case of dissented legal opinion made by Director of Prosecution and the same is final.






F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Jamshed Ali, S/o Shri Nasibuddin, H.No.C-95, Gali No.10, Sudamapuri, Gamri Extn. Delhi-110053. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 04.12.2012, in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you on point No. 1 to 6 as per available record in this office is as under:-

It is informed that no complaint of dated 26.06.2012 against Shri Dharmendra Sharma, r/o H.No.C-52/40 , A-Block, Gali No.6, Gamri Extn. Delhi has been received in this office. If any complaint is received against any officer/official, a preliminary inquiry is conducted by the Vigilance Officer of the department and in case of the complaint is proved as per documents available with the Inquiry Officer, an action as deemed fit is taken by the concerned authority. As the complaint against the aforesaid official has not been received in this office no further course of action by the authorities can be communicated.







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information regarding details of earned leave applied and refused to you from 01.06.2011 to till date are as under: - Sanctioned leaves:- 03 days from 21.11.2012 to 23.11.2012, 09 days from 29.11.2012 to 07.12.2012, Leave not accepted: 04.09.2012 to 01.10.2012 90 days earned leave from 24.09.12 to 22.12.2012, 30 days earned leave from 30.10.2012, 90 days earned leave from 16.11.2102, The Director of Prosecution is the authority competent to accept or reject the earned leave of the officers of this department.

(B.S.KAIN) Public Information Officer,


1st


The Chief Prosecutor, North, Directorate of Prosecution, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information regarding details of officers i.e. Director, Chief Prosecutor, Addl. PPs & APPs to whom earned leave have been granted with periods and respective grounds with periods sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you is personal information and the same is exempted from disclosure under section 8(j) of Right to Information Act-2005 as this relates to personal information and the disclosure of the same has no relationship to any public activity or interest as it would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy of the individual.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information as per available records of details of communications and various notes/Memos/minutes of the meeting of Chief Prosecutors & communication to Health Deptt. Of Govt. of NCT of Delhi sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you is voluminous and multifarious in nature and cannot be supplied in manner desired by you. you are hereby advised to raise specific issues/points on which information is required so that the same can be supplied to you.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012,filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information as per available records of your past ad-hoc Service from 06.06.95 to 09.08.99 sought by you is as under:- The Service Book for the period in question is not with the department as per available records.



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012,filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information as regard to Service Book of the officer sought by you is as under:- The Service Book of the officer has not been received from the office of Registrar of Companies, Govt. of India, Mumbai till date as per record of this office.



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012,filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on details of officers to whom earned leave have been granted with periods sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you cannot be disclosed under section 8 (j) of Right to Information Act-2005 as this relates to personal information the disclosure of the same has no relationship to any public activity or interest as it would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy of the individual.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer of this office on the subject cited above, the information on grounds and purposes for grant of earned leave sought by you is as under:- This is not specifically mentioned in the CCS (Leave) Rules that on what grounds or purposes earned leave can be granted to APPs. It is clearly mentioned that leave cannot be claimed by a Government servant as a matter of right. This is the discretion of the authority to refuse or accept the request for grant of leave as per administrative feasibility.



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on Copies of various complaints received against Shri B.S.Joon, Directorate of Prosecution from the date of his appointment as APP sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you cannot be disclosed under section 8 (j) of Right to Information Act-2005 as the information sought by you is personal information and the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity and it would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy of individual.

(B.S.KAIN)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor

1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: May please find enclosed herewith a copy of orders of 1st Appellate Authority in an appeal filed by Shri Anwar Ahmad, under Right to Information Act-2005. The 1st

Appellate Authority has accepted the appeal of the applicant partly and remanded back to PIO on point No.1, 5 & 6 to submit the information. The Information sought by the applicant on these points is as under:-

1. How many cases have been sent to Smt. Reeta Dutta for opinion a Chief Prosecutor till date? Give details also.

(B.S.KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER

ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.

APIO through C.P./In-charge of Karkadooma Courts, Saket Courts & Patiala House with the request that the requisite information as per available records may be furnished to this office for onward submission to the applicant.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, C-2, Type-III, Police Colony, P.S.Vivek Vihar, Delhi-. Sub; - Furnishing information under RTI Act-2005 as per orders of 1st

Appellate Authority.

In compliance of orders dated 17.11.2012 of 1st

Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act-2005, it is to inform you that the information on point No.3 cannot be disclosed being personal information of complainant and the concerned person has given in writing that the same shall not be disclosed as per provision of

As regards on point No.7.13 of the appeal the report was marked by Director of Prosecution to the Vigilance Officer as preliminary inquiry in the case of any complain t is conducted by the officer being departmental Vigilance Officer.

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer/

Addl. Public Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution


F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Harish Chahaun. B-58,Amrit Puri, N.D.S.E., Part-I, New Delhi. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005. It is to inform you that one Shri Manoj Kumar Shama, Inspector, Delhi Police an applicant has filed an application under Right to Information Act and sought copy of complaint and statement recorded by the Vigilance officer, Directorate of Prosecution on 20.01.2010 for complaint against certain officers of Delhi Police lodged on 15.12.2009. You are therefore advised to intimate whether the copy of statement may be made available to the applicant under Right to Information Act-2005 within 5 days. In case no intimation is received it will be presumed that you are having no objection for furnishing copy of statement and the same will be made available to the applicant without any further communication.


Addl. Public Prosecutor, 11irectorate of Prosecution

East District

2010 2011 2012 Fresh received 03 76 21 Transferred 02 05 02 Sent back to the court from where it was transferred

-- -- --

Total 05 81 23 Convicted -- 01 03 Acquittal -- 31 16 Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal -- 32 19 % of conviction 3.12% 15.78%

North District

2010 2011 2012 Fresh received 12 -- -- Transferred -- -- -- Sent back to the court from where it was transferred

-- -- --

Total 12 -- -- Convicted -- -- -- Acquittal -- -- 04 Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal -- -- 04 % of conviction -- -- --

West District

2010 2011 2012 Fresh received 24 13 33 Transferred -- -- -- Sent back to the court from where it was transferred

-- -- --

Total 24 13 33 Convicted -- 03 05 Acquittal 13 02 08 Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal 13 05 13 % of conviction 66.6% 38.46%

Central District


-- -- --

Total 07 08 02

Convicted -- -- 01 Acquittal -- -- -- Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal -- -- 01 % of conviction -- -- 100%

North East District.


-- -- --

Total 10 48 38 Convicted -- 07 07 Acquittal -- 17 21 Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal -- 24 28 % of conviction 29.16% 25%

South East District


-- -- --

Total 44 70 80 Convicted 22 36 32 Acquittal 06 20 11 Discharge -- -- 01 Total disposal 28 56 44 % of conviction 78.57% 64.28% 72.72%

South District


-- -- --

Total 29 49 25 Convicted 03 04 02 Acquittal 13 25 17 Discharge 01 02 -- Total disposal 17 31 19 % of conviction 17.64% 12.90% 10.52%

South West District

2010 2011 2012

Fresh received 21 28 23 Transferred -- -- 05 Sent back to the court from where it was transferred

-- -- --

Total 21 28 28 Convicted -- -- 10 Acquittal -- -- 04 Discharge -- -- 01 Total disposal -- -- 15 % of conviction -- -- 62.5%

2. Most of the cases are of sexual assault and kidnapping with minors. 3. No such information is available as per record. 4. This may be treated as NIL.

(B.S.KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER/


1ST

Appellate authority under Right to Information Act-2005.


:“As per record of this office an acquittal report regarding Case FIR

No.74/11 u/s 498-A, 306, 34 IPC, PS Anand Vihar, State v/s Sanjeev Kukreja @ Kukku, bearing No.217-A, dated 20.12.2011 was sent to Director of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 21.12.2011 and was recommended not found fit case for Appeal and the same was sent back to the DCP, East District on 06.02.2012.

(B.S.KAIN)

Public Information Officer/ Addl. Public Prosecutor

Directorate of Prosecution

First Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act-2005:




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Sanjeev Kukreja, 162, Jagriti Enclave, Delhi-110092. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 06.11.2012 filed in the office undersigned, on the subject cited above, it is to inform you that the information sought by you has been collected from the concerned office and as per record the same is as under:- “As per record of this office an acquittal report regarding Case FIR No.74/11 u/s 498-A, 306, 34 IPC, PS Anand Vihar, State v/s Sanjeev Kukreja @ Kukku, bearing No.217-A, dated 20.12.2011 was sent to Director of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 21.12.2011 and was recommended not found fit case for Appeal and the same was sent back to the DCP, East District on 06.02.2012.

(B.S.KAIN) Public Information Officer/

Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Shashi Kant Gaur, Inspector, Qtr.No.2, Type-IV, Police Colony, Delhi-110051. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application filed in the office undersigned, on the subject cited above, it is to inform you that the information sought by you as per record is as under:- “The information sought by you is a privileged communication in between the state and the investigation agency and its disclosure may affect investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders hence the same cannot be disclosed under Indian Evidence Act.”






F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Yogesh Kumar, C/o Pratidhi, Room No.41, 2nd

Shakarpur Police Station Complex, Floor,

Pusta Road, Ramesh Park, Delhi-110092. Sub: 1st

appeal under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed in the office of 1st Appellate

Authority, on the subject cited above, in continuation of this office letter of even

number dated 04.01.2013, it is to inform you that the appeal filed will be heard on

21.01.2013 at 3.00 p.m. in the office of 1st

Appellate Authority, Room No.174,

Directorate of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

You are therefore advised to make it convenient to attend the same on the

scheduled date and time.



the information on the various points as per record is as under:- Point No.1 & 2. It is informed that copy of letter No.1022/Complt./Outer District/, dated 08.06.2012 was received in this office along-with enclosures, i.e. report submitted by Inspector, ATO, Prashant Vihar, and application of the applicant dated 03.05.2012, regarding complaint against Smt. Usha Mann, Retired Chief Prosecutor. The reference in question has been forwarded to Pr. Secretary (Home), Home (Police) Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, vide letter No.1910/DOP/2012, dated 25.06.2012 for information and further appropriate action in the matter.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 05.10.2012, received in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on the various points as per record is as under:-

1. As per available record, No service book received from Registrar of Companies. Mumbai is available in this office.

2. Copies of the extracts from Service Book of the officer, onwards 01.07.2009 is enclosed.

3. (a). Director of Prosecution being the competent authority has marked the enquiry to the officer being Vigilance Officer of the department. (b).The copies of the same cannot be supplied being confidential documents and .the enquiry is not concluded yet. (c ). Copies of orders of competent authority on applications dated 04.09.2012 and 24.09.2012. Statement of Lady APPS posted in various courts. Tis Hazari Courts:- (i). Ms.Reeta Sharma, (ii). Ms. Zauiba Majid, (iii). Ms.Poonam Singhal, (iv). Ms. Subhra Goel, Saket Courts complex (i). Ms.Jyotsana Sharma, Karkardooma Courts: (i). Ms. Anju Rathi Rana, (ii). Ms. Anupama Singh, Rohini Complex, (i). Ms. Nimmi Sisodia, (ii). Ms. Suchitra Singh, (iii). Ms. Raj Rani Sharma, (iv). Ms. Garima Gupta, (v). Ms. Kiran Bala Dwarka Court Complex (i). Ms. Anuradha Sharma, (ii). Ms. Vandana Chahaun,T

Names of APPs posted in Mahila Courts. (i). Ms.Poonam Singhal, Central Distrcit (ii). Ms. Shubra Goel, Mahila Court-I, (iii). Shri A.K.Saxena, Mahila Court-II, (iv). Shri Kumar Sanjay, Mahila Court-III. (v). Shri N.K.Verma, Mahila Court, SE Distt-I (vi). Shri Jagdamba Pandey, Mahila Court-II (vii). Shri Honey Goel, Mahila Court, N.D. (viii). Shri Gyanendra Kumar Shukla-I Mahila Court, East District. (ix). Shri Gayender Kumar Shukla-II, Mahila Court (x). Shri Vikas kumar, Mahila Court, NE-I, Distt. (xi). Shri Rahul Sharma, Mahila Court-2, (xii). Ms. Suchitra Singh, Mahila Court, North West, (xiii). Parveen Kumar, Outer District, (xiv). Ms. Vandana Chahaun, Mahila Court-II (xv). Shri Pankaj Kumar Ranga, Mahila Court-I



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Ms. Krishana Walia, W/o Shri Ram Chandar Walia, r/o H.No.1377, Badshahi Bagh, Ambala City. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 25.10.2012 , received in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on point No.1 as per record is as under:- The point is legal one and is not in the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005. A Government servant can be prosecuted as per directions and orders of Hon’ble Court as per provisions of CCS (Conduct) Rules. As regards to obtaining copy of the orders of Hon’ble Court, the applicant is advised to apply in the appropriate Court with details of the case No. and title of the case for providing copy of the order.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 04.10.2012, received in the office on 11.10.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on the various points as per record is as under:- 1 The desirable qualification for the post of Asstt. Public Prosecutor is experience as Government advocate. 2. The question raised by the applicant on this point is legal one as the same is not in the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005.



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Anwar Ahmad, S/o Shri Mohd. Bashir, R/o 1154, Choori Walan, Jama Masjid, Delhi. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 04.10.2012, in the office of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on the various points as per record is as under:-

“The Inquiry has been completed by the Vigilance Officer of the Department. The Vigilance Officer has come to the conclusion that the complaint has failed to produce any corroborative evidence in support of his allegations. The report in original of the Vigilance Officer, written submission of the complaint and explanation of Ms.Reeta Dutta, Chief Prosecutor dated 29.08.2012 and 01.09.2012 has been forwarded to Pr. Secretary (Home), Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide letter No.2558/DOP/2012, dated 05.09.2012”.



1st Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act-2005.




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Jai Bhagwan, Inspector, 3043, Presently posted in Security, Parliament Security Unit. Sub: Filing of 1st

Appeal under Right to Information Act-2005.

In pursuance of Orders of 1st

It is submitted that the letter No.2868 dated 11.07.2012 is received in the

office of Director of Prosecution for comments in the matter. A reply on the

above said letter was given by concerned Addl. P.P. on 20.07.2012 to the office

of P.P. Delhi. The same was forwarded by P.P.Delhi of Director of Prosecution

on 20.07.2012. The same was sent to Addl. Secretary, Home (General) vide

letter No.2184 on 21.07.2012.

Appellate Authority, dated 17.10.2012, on the

subject cited above, the information has been obtained from the concerned office

and as per available record the same is reproduced as under:-

Another letter No.4086, dated 14.09.2012 is received in this directorate

for moving the application u/s 321 of Cr.P.C and application u/s 321 Cr.P.C.

moved by Addl. P.P. and a report of the above letter is sent to Dy. Secretary

(Home) vide letter No.3009/DOP/12, dated 17.10.2012 and next date of hearing

is fixed for consideration and argument on charge is 19.11.2012.

No other record is available in the office of Director of Prosecution and

all record in this matter has been forwarded to office of Dy. Secretary (Home).

(B.S.Kain)




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, C-2, Type-III, Police Colony, P.S.Vivek Vihar, Delhi-. Sub: Filing of 1st


With reference to your 1st

Appeal filed in the office of Chief Prosecutor,

North, on the subject cited above, an application under Right to Information Act, It

is informed that your appeal will be heard on 25.10.2012 at 3.00 p.m. in the chamber

of Chief Prosecutor, North, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

You are therefore advised to attend the office of 1st

Appellate Authority, on

the scheduled date & time.


Addl. Public Prosecutor.,



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, C-2, Type-III, Police Colony, P.S.Vivek Vihar, Delhi-. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005 as per

orders of 1st


In pursuance of orders of 1st

Appellate Authority, the information on Point No.11 & 12 has been collected from the concerned functionaries and as per available record of the office the same is reproduced as under: -

“ It is informed that said complaint was anonymous and as per CVC

guidelines no action could be taken on such complaints. The allegations

contained in the complaint were not verified due to the reason that it was an

anonymous complaint. Moreover the matter was sub-judice and action could be

taken against the office if there are any adverse remarks against the concerned

Addl. P.P. by the Court. It is also clarified that the Addl. P.P. has only

forwarded the application moved by the complaint.”




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Subhash H.No.85/279, Lady Harding Staff Quarters, Panchkuin Road, New Delhi under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the letter may be gone through and information in this matter may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



The Reader to DOP, Directorate of Prosecution


F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 04.09.2012, in the office of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on the various points as per record is as under:-

1. No such information on this point is available with this office and all the process for recruitment is taken up with the concerned agency by the Home Department of Govt. of NCT of Delhi being the Cadre Controlling Authority.

2. As such no information on this point is available with this office.

3. The ACRs beyond the period 16.02.2001 to till date is not available in this

office and may be with Home Department. The officer may approach the concerned department for copies of ACRs for the period in question if desired so.

(B.S.KAIN)



The Chief Prosecutor, North, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012,filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on copies of complaints against B.S.Joon, Director of Prosecution sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you cannot be disclosed under section 8 (h) of Right to Information Act-2005 as it would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 25.09.2012, in the office of Public Information Officer, Chief Secretary’s office, on the subject cited above received in this office on 28.09.2012, the information on the various points as per record is as under:-

1. No service book is maintained for employees appointed on ad-hoc basis.

The service book of the officer available with the department is w.e.f. 16.02.2001.

2. The proposal for granting of MACP is being considered. 3. The order for re-fixation of pay in respect of officer has been issued by

the department as the same was applicable. 4. The information sought is a privileged communication in between

employer and employee and not in the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005.

5. The information sought is a privileged communication in between employer and employee and not in the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005.

6. The complaint against an officer is a confidential document and cannot be disclosed in public interest.

7. The information sought by the applicant is voluminous in nature and the officer is advised to inspect the files/service record of the concerned officer and indicate the copies of relevant record/documents which are required by the officer and the same will be made available.

8. Shri Sanjay Soni, Addl. P.P. has been designated as Head of office vide order No. F.4(43)DOP/Acctts/Vol.I/2004/2765-70, dated 01.10.2010 and Shri S.C.Sharma Chief Prosecutor (Central) has been designated as Vigilance Officer of the department with the approval of Cadre Controlling Authority.

9. Proceeding on LTC & earned leave are personal matters and being third party information the same cannot be disclosed. The training is official matter and the officers had gone on training in official capacity.

10. The Memos issued to the officer are privileged communication in between employer and the employee and are not in the ambit of cannot be disclosed.

11. The information sought by the applicant is voluminous in nature and the applicant is advised to inspect the relevant files and indicate the copies of relevant record/documents which are required so that same can be made available.

12. One Ambassador Car is provided as official vehicle to Director of Prosecution.

13. The vehicle is parked at the residence of the officer to avoid dead mileage.

14. The questions information sought by the applicant is personal in nature and is not in the ambit of Right to Information act.

15. Complaints filed against the officers are a confidential in nature and cannot be disclosed as the same are a privileged communication and not in the ambit of Right to Information Act.

16. No such copy of petition and replies filed by the department are available I n this office and transfer of any officer is prerogative of the cadre controlling authority.

17. No transfer policy is in existence in this office however transfer/posting is being made as per functional requirement of an office.

18. D.P.W.A. is an elective body and this office is not having any control and as such no information is available with this office.

19. As at point 18 above 20. The information sought is confidential one and not a public document

and hence cannot be disclosed in public interest. 21. Head of office is an administrative post and the officer holding the post is

also assigned court work. 22. There are no restrictions for deputing Addl. P.P. / Chief Prosecutors for

Court work. The officers are deputed as per functional requirement in smooth functioning of official work. The Post of Director/Chief Prosecutor is a supervisory post.

23. It is not administratively feasible as there is shortage of Prosecuting officers and it is essential to depute an officer in case of leave by the regular Prosecuting officer in a particular court.

24. No such proposal is under consideration in administrative department.



1st

Appellate Authority under Right to information Act-2005.

Chief Prosecutor (North,) Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of 8Delhi, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.

25. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION: DELHI GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI

F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Rajiv Bharti, H.No.320, Hastasaal Gaon, Uttam Nagar, Delhi-110059. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 01.10.2012, filed in the office of

undersigned under Right to Information the point wise information has been obtained from the concerned office and as per record the same is as under: 1. The Special Report and JD was received in this office on 09.06.2012 and was

examined by the concerned functionary and was found fit for appeal and same was sent to L& J Department through Ld. DOP.

2. It cannot be disclosed as per provisions of RTI Act being a third party matter. The same can be supplied when first party furnishes request in writing.

3. The same cannot be disclosed.


Addl. Public Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution.


F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Ms. Nirmala Sharma, President, Jagriti Mahila Samiti, 198-G, M.I.G.Green Flats, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi-110027. Sub: Furnishing of Information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 20.09.2012, filed in the office of Chief Prosecutor, West, on the subject cited above, the relevant information on the points has been obtained from the concerned and as per record, the information sought by you is as under:-

1. The Charge sheet of FIR No. 106/12 was forwarded to the Prosecution Branch for scrutiny by the concerned S.H.O / A.C.P on 28/08/2010 vide entry no. 88/CP/W.

2. At the time of scrutiny certain objection were raised by the concerned ID.A.P.P vide memo dt. 06/09/2010. However the charge sheet was sent to Court by the concerned A.C.P, Punjabi Bagh on 15/09/2010.

3. As per record of Ld. Chief Prosecutor (West) Shri A.B.Asthana APP has scrutinized the Charge sheet and Shri Om Prakash, Chief Prosecutor west forwarded the trial to concerned. The telephone No. of CP West is 23924808.

4. Ms. Sweta Shahi, APP appeared for state on 18.10.2010, Ms.Sheetan Choudhary APP on 11.03.2011, Shri Brij Pal appeared for state on 13.07.2011 in the respective court.Ms. Subhra Goel, APP appeared in the Court for state on 20.12.2011. 22.05.2012 and 29.08.2012.

5. This information is not on record. 6. Since the submission of the charge sheet, total six dates have been given

by the Hon’ble Court. Names of the Concerned Ld. APP may be sought from the office of Ld. Chief P.P (West).

7. The next date of hearing in this case is on 31/10/2012 and the same has been fixed for Argument on Charge.

8. The Contents of this information would be taken up at the stage of the Argument on Charge.

9. No comment is possible on this point. 10. The case is fixed for Argument on Charge on 31/10/2012. 11. During investigation the Prosecution has no role to play. 12. Prosecutors work in their respective Courts. 13. No substantive role is played by the Prosecution Branch. However, Id.

Prosecutor is obliged to assist the Court, if required. 14. No substantive role is played by the Prosecution Branch. However Id.

Prosecutor is obliged to assist the Court, if required. 15. No substantive role is played by the Prosecution Branch. However, Id.

Prosecutor is obliged to assist the Court, if required.

16. Directorate of Prosecution is having branch offices in all the District Courts located at Tis Hazari, Rohini, Saket, Karkardooma, Patiala House, and Dwarka Courts. The Prosecution defends the part of state only in the respective court.

(B.S.Kain)

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER Addl. Public Prosecutor,


1st





1. Charge sheet was filed in the Court on 03.07.2010 in the presence of Ld. APP.

2. The Charge sheet as per Police file was not sent for scrutiny to Prosecution Branch.

3. As at point 2 above. 4. Shri Pankaj Bhatia, APP appeared on behalf of state 07 times from

03.07.2010 to 06.03.2012 and on last two dates i.e. 25.09.2012 & 26.04.2012, Shri B.B.Bhasin, had appeared on behalf of State. The telephone No. of Ld.CP West is 23924808.

5. The information on this point is not clear hence cannot be provided for being ambiguous.

6. On 03.07.2010 to 25.09.2012, the case has been adjourned for nine times.Shri Pankaj Bhatia, APP appeared on state 07 times from 03.07.2010 to 06.03.2012.

7. Ct.Tejpal, HC Heera Lal and Smt. Babita have been examined as Prosecution witness and next date of hearing in this case is 19.02.2013.

8. Arguments on charge were heard addressed on 30.09.2010. 9. Charge u/s 324 IPC has been framed against accused. 10. The information on this point has already been provided at point

No.4. M

(B.S.Kain)



1st





F.No. ID No /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by Shri Rajeev Bharti, H.No.320, Hasatsal Village, Uttam Nagar, Delhi-110059 for seeking information under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the application may be looked into and the information sought by the applicant as per available record may be furnished to the undersigned within five days from the receipt of this communication for onward submission to the applicant.

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, To, Reader to Ld. C.P. West, Directorate of Prosecution.



F.No. ID No.692/RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by Shri Syed Waqar Ali, s/o Syed Shehzad Ali, R/o 1518, 1st

Floor, Gali Akhuji, Farash Khana, Delhi-110006 for seeking information under Right to Information Act-2005.

The contents of the application may be looked into and the information sought by the applicant as per available record may be furnished to the undersigned within five days from the receipt of this communication for onward submission to the applicant.

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, To, Shri Balbir Singh, APIO, Directorate of Prosecution.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: 55 Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by Shri G.D.Parashar, C-114, 1st

Floor, Fateh Nagar, New Delhi seeking information under Right to Information Act-2005.


(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, To, Reader to C.P. West, Direcatorate of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, along-with copy of the application.



F.No. ID No.1715/RTI-5/DOP/2013/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by Shri Hukam Singh, s/o Late Shri Prem Chand, Village Gokulpur, Delhi-110094 received from Public Information Officer cum Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, North East District, Delhi for seeking information under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the application may be looked into and the information sought by the applicant on point No.1, 3 & 5 as per available record may be furnished to the undersigned within five days from the receipt of this communication for onward submission to the applicant.

a . (B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, To, Reader to C.P./In-Charge, Distt. North East, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-05/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, North District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Ajay Kumar s/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o 32-33, Kucha Chaudhary, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of Shri Ajay Kumar s/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o 32-33, Kucha Chaudhary, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005 from the office of PIO, Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, North District, Delhi for providing the information under Right to Information Act-2005.

3. On going through the contents of application, it has been observed that the information sought in the letter the applicant does not pertain to this department.



(B.S.Kain)


2. Shri Ajay Kumar s/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o 32-33, Kucha Chaudhary, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kaushik, r/o B-95, Shiv Vihar, Gali No.6, Phase-10, Delhi-110094. Sub: Furnishing of Information under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed in the office of Public Information Officer, Special Secretary, Finance Accounts Department, on 13.09.2012 and received in this office on 28.09.2012, the information on the points related to this office as per record is as under:-

a). Not pertains to this office. b). S/Shri Aqueel Ahmad Samani, Brij Pal Singh, Kalim Ahmad, Jagdish Prasad Mishra, Vakil Ahmad, Charan Dass and Mukesh Kumar Ahuja, are appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutors on contract basis and these officers are not appointed through any agency or society. c). Not pertains to this office. d). these officers are working on consolidated pay of Rs.26000/- p.m. e). Not pertains to this office. f). these employees are working against the existing vacancies in the department and there is no need for creation of any post. g). No attendance of these officers are recorded. h). Not pertains to this office. i). No such facilities are extended to officers on contract basis. j). Not applicable. k). Not pertains to this office. l). Not pertains to this office. m). Not pertains to this office. n). Not pertains to this office.

(B.S.Kain) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER


First Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act-2005.



F.No.I.D.No. RTI-05/DOP/2011 Dated: To, Shri Jai Bhagwan, Inspector-3043, Presently posted in Security, Parliament House Security Unit Delhi Police. Sub: 1st


With reference to your appeal filed in the office of the 1st

You are therefore advised to attend the office of 1

Appellate

Authority, I am to inform you that your appeal will be heard on 05.10.2012 at 3.00

p.m in the office of Chief Prosecutor, (North) Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of

NCT of Delhi, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. st

Appellate Authority on




Chief Prosecutor (North/Anti Corruption) Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.


F.No.I.D.No. /DOP/2006-07/Estt./ Dated: To, Shri Ashok Aggarwal, S/o Shri Madan lal, Distt.Jail, Rohini, Delhi-110089. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application received in the office of undersigned on

the subject cited above, the point-wise information sought by you is as under:-

The information sought by you is personal in nature and is

exempted from disclosure under section 8 (i) of Right to

Information Act-2005, which reads as under:-

Point No. 1 to 4.

“Information which relates to personal information, the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the Appellate Authority as the case may be , is satisfied that larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information.

(B.S.Kain), Public Information Officer,


1st


Chief Prosecutor(North), Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.


F.No.I.D.No. /DOP/2006-07/Estt./ Dated: To, The Secretary (Revenue)/ Divisional Commissioner, Revenue Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi. 5-Sham Nath Marg, Delhi-110054. Sub: CIC Decision No.CIC/SG/A/2011/000649/12392, dated 16.05.2011

(Appeal No.CIC/SG/A/2011/000649, providing of information to Ms.Priyanaka Sinha.

Sir,

With reference to your letter No.F.ID/3701/CIC-2010/RTI/Rev./952-963,

dated 25.05.2011, on the subject cited above, I am to inform you that the

information of pending trial cases and decided cases u/s 16 of the Bonded

Labour (Abolition) System Act for the year 1976 till date may be treated as

“NIL” as informed by the concerned Prosecutors as per available records of the

respective Courts.

Yours faithfully,




F.No.I.D.No. /DOP/2006-07/Estt./ Dated: To, Dr. Jwala Prasad, F-66, New Usmanpura, Delhi-110053. Sub: Furnishing of Information under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed in the office of undersigned on

dated 10.05.2011, on the subject cited above. The information sought was called for

from the concerned Public Prosecutor who has informed as under:-

As per the report of Challan Clerk, the supplementary charge sheet was not

sent to this office for scrutiny, hence there is no question of checking by any of the

official of Prosecution Branch.

Regarding supply of the certified copy of the supplementary charge sheet is

concerned; same cannot be given/supplied from this office. The applicant is advised

to obtain the same from the copying agency.

If the applicant is not satisfied with the information supplied by the PIO, he

may file an appeal before the 1st

Appellate Authority within 30 days from the

receipt of this letter.




F.No. ID No. /DOP/2006-07/Estt./ Dated: To, Shri Kailash Bharti, H.No.38, H-4/5, Suvidha Kunj, Pitampura, Delhi-110034. Sub: Furnishing of Information under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed in the office of undersigned on the

subject cited above, the concerned functionaries were asked to furnish the relevant

information as per record. The information as furnished by the concerned officer is

provided as under:-

S.No. Information provided.

Point No.1. The charge sheet of concerned case was filed on 28.11.2009. Further information sought is not related to prosecution.

Point No.2 to 10 Information sought on these points are not related to prosecution department.

Point No.11 In reply to point No.11 the file of the concerned case is not in the Court room No.102.

Point No.12 to 16 Information sought on these points are not related to Prosecution.

Point No.17. Reply of S. No.17: Prosecution has not applied for inspection of case file.

18 and 19 Information sought at SI.No. 18 and 19 is not related to prosecution .

Point 20 Reply of SI.No. 20 question is not clear.

Point No. 22 Information sought at SI. No.22 is not related to prosecution.

Point No. 23: Reply of SI. No. 23: the information as provided by the Office of the Chief Prosecutor North West is below:

Date Asst. Public Prosecution

Naib Court Prosecution Branch for PS Ashok vihar

Naib court Prosecution Branch for PS Saraswati Vihar

23.3.2009 Sh. P.K. Gangawar Ct. Kuldeep no. 640/NW

Ct. Dilawar No. 1084/NW

05.12.2009 Shri K.D.Pachuari -do- -do- 18.12.2009 -do- -do- -do- 24.12.2009 -do- -do- -do- 16.02.2010 -do- -do- -do- 27.04.2010 -do- -do- -do- 28.09.2010 Ms. Nimi Sisodiya -do- -do- 16.10.2010 None -do- -do-

14.03.S2010 Shri A.B.Asthana -do- Ct.Pradeep No.1534/W

If the applicant is not satisfied with the information furnished by the PIO, he


Appellate Authority within 30 days from the receipt of this letter.




F.No. /RTI-05/2012 Dated: To, Shri Kishan Rai, T-185, Huts C.A. Block, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088. Sub: Furnishing of Information under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed in the office of CPIO, o/o Addl.

Registrar, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi and received in this office from PIO

o/o Chief Secretary, Delhi, on 25.10.2012 in the o/o undersigned the information as

per record on point No.3 and 8 in respect of this department is as under:-

Point No.3.

No penalty has been imposed against any officer/official of this department

under Right to Information Act-2005 till date.

Point No.8.

The Public Information officer and 1st

(i). Shri B.S.Kain, Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution,

Appellate Authority of the

department are as under:

Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi T.No. 23986952.

(ii). Shri R.S.Yadav, Chief Prosecutor, North, Directorate of Prosecution,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi T.No.23934808

(B.S.Kain)




F.No. ID No. 534 /RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, SMT. Payal Punhanni, w/o Shri Chandan Punhanni, R/o C-452, 1st

Sector-1, Avantika, , Floor,

Rohini, Delhi. Sub: Seeking of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 09.05.2011 filed in the office of Chief Prosecutor, Outer District, Deptt. of Prosecution, Rohini, Delhi, on the subject cited above, the point wise information sought by you has been collected from the concerned functionaries and the same is as under:- Sr. No. Information Supplied 1. The information as asked undert this para is that the case

was put up in the Court on 23.12.2010. 2. The information as asked under this para is that, from the

record available it appears that the investigating officer could not meet Ms. Payal Punhanni or her husband. Ms. Payal Punhanni had sought anticipatory bail but the same is reported to have been declined. I.O. had attempted to meet Ms. Payal Punhanni on 03.12.2010, 11,12,2010, 18.12.2010 and 20.12.2010 but she was not found at her available at her address.

3. The information as asked under this para is that, the challan was scrutinized by Shri B.B.Bhasin, APP, and counter scrutinized by Shari R.A.Yadav, Addl. P.P. and it was forwarded to Court by ACP Shri Balwant S.Dhingra.

4. The information as asked under this para is that, the information relations to the mental state of a person, and therefore, is not within the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005.

In case you are not satisfied with the information furnished by the Public Information Officer of the department, you may file an appeal before the 1st

Appellate Authority i.e. Director, Directorate of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, within 30 days from the receipt of information

(B.S.Kain)

Public information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor



F.No. ID No. 534 /RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, Sh. Keshav Jalliya, c/o National Dalit Movement for Justice, 8/13, 3rd

South Patel Nagar, Floor,

New Delhi- 110008. Sub: Seeking of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 25.04.2011 on the subject cited above, filed in the office of Home Secretary, Delhi Secretariat, I.P.Estate, New Delhi, and transferred to the undersigned on 05.05.2011, it is informed that as per report of Reader to Director of Prosecution, no information as sought by you is available in this office. In case you are not satisfied with the information furnished by the Public Information Officer of the department, you may file an appeal before the 1st


(B.S.Kain)



Copy to:-

1. Shri M.A.Ashraf, Joint Secretary (Home), Home Police-II Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi with reference to letter No.14/72/RTI/2011/HP-II/2618, dated 29.04.2011.

2. The Public Information Officer, Department of Welfare of SC/ST/OBC/ Minorities, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, B-Block, 2nd

Floor, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi.

(B.S.Kain)




F.No. ID No. /RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, Sh. Mahender Singh, R/o 1450, Jyoti Nagar, Delhi- 110093 Sub: Seeking of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 21.04.2011 on the subject cited above, the point wise information sought by you have been collected from the concerned functionaries and the same is as under:- Sr. No.

Information sought Information Supplied

1. Whether any complaint of Sh. Mahender Sing s/o Sh. Jaswant Sing dated 4.12.2010 has been received in your good office from PS Jyoti Nagar, for the purpose of giving legal opinion.

A complaint dated 14.12.2010 was received in this department.

2. If, yes, then what opinion has been given by your good office on the said complaint.

The relevant information contains 8 pages. A copy of the same can be made available to you on payment of Rs.16/- (Rs.Sixteen only) as per provisions of RTI Act-2005. You are hereby advised to deposit the said amount with the Drawing & Disbursing Officer of this department.



(B.S.Kain)


Directorate of Prosecution Encl. as above.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, O/o Pr. Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi Delhi Secretariat, I.P.Estate, New Delhi-110002. Sub: Transfer of application received from Shri Rajiv Vaid, s/o Shri H.P.Vaid, 246, Sunhari Bagh Apartment, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi-110085 under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The undersigned has received an application of Shri Rajiv Vaid, s/o Shri H.P.Vaid, 246, Sunhari Bagh Apartment, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi-110085 regarding for providing of information under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

2. It has been informed by Vigilance Officer of this department that enquiry report has already been sent to Home Department along-with the relevant papers for disposal vide diary No.140/DOP/2011 dated 15.0.2011.

3. As such the information sought by the applicant on point no. 1 to 2 is not presently available with the department.

4. The application is, therefore, being transferred to you under sub section 3 of section 6 of Right to Information Act, 2005 for furnishing reply directly to the applicant under intimation to this office.

5. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is more closely connected, under intimation to the applicant.

(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy to:- Shri Rajiv Vaid, s/o Shri H.P.Vaid, 246, Sunhari Bagh Apartment, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi-110085 with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.




F.No. ID No.454/RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, Office of Labour Commissioner, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 5-Sham Nath Marg, Delhi-110054. Sub: Notice of hearing in Central Information Commission for 16.05.2011 at 10.00 a.m.

Please find enclosed herewith a Notice of hearing No.CIC/SG/A/ 2011/

000649 dated 18.04.2011 from Under Secretary & Dy. Registrar, Central

Information Commission in the matter of Ms.Priyanka Sinha, c/o Pratidhi, Room

No.38, Shakarpur Police Station Complex, Ramesh Park, Pushta Road, Delhi-

110092. It has been informed that the appeal filed by the applicant has been fixed

for hearing on 16.05.2011 at 10.00 a.m. before Shri Shailesh Gandhi, Information

Commissioner, Central Information Commission, Club Building, Opposite Ber

Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067.

A copy of application under Right to Information Act-2005 filed by the

applicant on 24.07.2010 (received in this office on 27.07.2010 was transferred to

you on 02.08.2010 .A copy of the notice of hearing is therefore being forwarded to

you under Section 5(4) of Right to Information Act-2005, with the request to kindly

make it convenient to attend the hearing before Information Commissioner, Central

Information Commission on the scheduled date and time.



Encl. aas above.



F.No. ID No. 461 /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, Shri Shailesh Gandhi, Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, Club Road, Near Post Office, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067. Sub: Written submission in 2nd

Appeal filed by Shri Masood Ahmad, C- 1/50, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi-110053.

Sir, Please refer to the 2nd

appeal filed by Shri Masood Ahmad, C-1/50, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi-110053, before Central Information Commission on the subject cited above. The undersigned is submitting following facts for consideration and further necessary action at your end.

Date Action taken 16.08.2010 An application was received from Shri Masood Ahmad, r/o C-

1/50, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi-110053 for seeking information. 01.09.2010 The information sought by the applicant on point No.11, 12, 13 &

14 falls which was particularly about one of the official who was transferred to office of Divisional Commissioner cum Pr. Secretary (Revenue), the application of the applicant was transferred to PIO concerned.

04.09.2011 A letter was written to the applicant intimating that information sought by him is ready and comprises 1241 pages and asked to deposit an amount of Rs.2482/- (Rs.Two thousands four hundred eighty two only) as requisite fee as per provisions of Right to Information Act-2005.

10.09.2010 The point No.4 & 7 of applicant seeking information was about the Director of this office, and the personal file of the officer was with Home Deptt. being the Cadre Controlling Authority. A copy of the application was also transferred to Public Information Officer, Home Deptt.

14.09.2010 The information as available with the department on the points related was forwarded to the applicant.

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER: DELHI


F.No. ID No.1 (144)/DOP/2012/ Dated: To, Smt. Usha Mann, R/o 13-B, Super Deluxe Flats, Sector-15, NOIDA,U.P. Sub: Providing of photocopies of files for the record dealing with the matters of Smt. Usha Mann, Ex. Chief Prosecutor. In continuation of this office letter of even number dated 24.05.2013, on the subject cited above, and in response to your letter dated ----------- please find enclosed herewith photocopies of the relevant record as inspected by you on 21.05.2013 in pursuance of decisions dated 15.04.2013 of Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, in an appeal bearing No.CIC/AD/C/2011/001455 and telephonic discussions held on 23.05.2013. The details of photocopy of the relevant files are as under:- S.No. File No. Correspondence

side

Noting side

1. 1(144)/DOP/07/Vol.II 13/C 6/N

2. 1(144)/DOP/2007/Vol.III 6/C --

3. 1(144)/DOP/PF/Vol.IV 26/C 6/N

4. 1(144)/DOP/2012/ 57/C 11/N

5. 1(144)DOP/2012-13 222/C 21/N

6. 1(144)/DOP/2012 Extracts of correspondence specified containing 11 pages.

--

7. 2(337)/DOP/2007-08 6 pages 44/N & 45/CN

inadvertently

marked as C

8. F.Misc./DOP/2012/Acctts. 10 pages 4/N

9. F. Misc.Acctt./DOP/ 65 pages 14/N

(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor,

Encl. As above.

With reference to your application

10dated 14.03.2011 filed to Public Information Officer, on the subject cited above

under Right to Information Act-2005 the information on the relevant points

pertaining to this department has been called from the concerned authorities. The

point wise reply is as under:-

1. The information

2. Duty order dated 27.10.2010 was delivered by Shri Raj Singh, Head

Constable personally to the applicant on 28.10.2010. Memo dated

12.11.2010 was handed over by Santosh, Constable to the applicant

personally on 23.11.2010.

3. Neither Log Book nor movement book of the officials arrying Dak to and

from Patiala House Prosecution Branch are maintained at the office of

Prosecution, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

4. There is no proof/delivery copy of the dulty order dated 27.10.2010 and

Memo dated 12.11.2010 by the Chie Prosecutor or any other official at

Patiala House as both documents were issued from the office of DOP, Tis

Hazari, Delhi and as per practice the same were received by Dak person of

Patiala House Courts to deliver the same to the concerned persons at Patiala

House Courts.

5. The duty order dared 27.10.2010 was delivered by Head Constable Raj

Singh, and Memo dated 12.11.2010 was delivered by Constable Santosh

respectively, who informed this office in writing about delivery of

documents to the to the applicant stating that Ms.Mann refused to put

signatures on the copy of documents and did not acknowledge the same in

writing although she went through the documents thoroughly.

6. The copies of dispatch and receipt registers will be provided after

depositing the requisite fee as per provisions of RTI Act-2005.

7. Head Constable Raj Singh, received the documents at Pataila House Courts

New Delhi.

8. The relevant documents contain 21 pages and the copy of the same will be

supplied on payment of requisite fee as per provisions of Right to


9. As above.

10. The basis and service of all the reports of the Chief Prosecutor about the

absence of the applicant w,.e.f. 27.10.2010 to 20.11.2010 emirates from the

fact that the Chief Prosecutor of the period in question was appointed as

Incharge of New Delhi District at Patiala House Courts Directorate of

Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi since 13.09.2010 vide order dated .

09.09.2010. Inspection reports of absence of applicant was not prepared,

however, Director of Prosecution, Govt.of NCT of Delhi was apprised

about absence of the applicant and in her abse3nce Shri R.K.Pandey, Addl.

P.P. has been looking after bail matters as well as Court work in the Court

of Shri S.P.Garg, ASJ/Judge Incharge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

The authority to do so has arisen from the post of Incharge, Patiala House

Courts was posted by DOP on 09.09.2010.

11. The documents contains 13 pages and copies of the same will be supplied

on payment of requisite fee as per provisions Right to Information Act-

2005.

12. Shri R.K.Pandey Addl. P.P. worked in the Court of Shri S.P.Garg, DJ,

Patiala House Courts, between 27.10.2010 to 20.11.2010 except on

19.10.2010 when Shri Inder Kumar, Addl. P.P. Worked since applicant has

not resumed her duty.

13. The information sought by the applicant relates to personal information the

disclosure of which has no relationship to any public authority or interest,

or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the

individual, a per provisions of Section 8 (j).

14. The information sought by the applicant contains 51 pages for which the

applicant is advised to deposit an amount of Rs.102/- for obtaining copies

of relevant documents.

In case, you are not satisfied with the information provided by the Public

Information officer of the department, you may file an appeal before the 1st

Appellate Authority i.e. Director, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi within 30 days from the receipt of this letter.





F.No. ID No. 523/RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, Shri Sanjay Upadhayay, S/o Shri S.P.Upadhayay, Flat No.892, Sector 14, Pocket-1, Dwarka, New Delhi. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Sanjay Upadhayay,S/o Shri S.P.Upadhayay, Flat No.892, Sector 14, Pocket-1, Dwarka, New Delhi.

With reference to your application filed on 24.03.2011 under Right to

Information Act-2005, in the office of Public Information Officer, Police Head

Quarter (received to the undersigned on 02.04.2011) on the subject cited above

under Right to Information Act-2005, I am to inform you that the information on

point no.1 is within the jurisdiction of Dy. Commissioner of Police cum PIO,

Traffic- Southern Zone and in point No. 2 No information has been sought by the

applicant and only seeking advise/clarification which is not covered under the ambit

of Right to Information Act-2005.







Copy for information and necessary action to- Public Information Officer/ Dy. Commissioner of Police, Traffic, Southern Range, New Delhi alongwith a copy of application filed by the applicant, with the request that the information sought by the applicant may be directly furnished to the applicant.





F.No. ID No. /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated; To, 1. The Public Information Officer, Delhi Police. Distt. South

2. The Public Information Officer, Deptt. of Law, Judicial & Legislative Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Secretariat, I.P.Estate, New Delhi.

Sub: Furnishing of information on the application received from Ms.Neha Sharma. d/o Shri Yash Gandhi, r/o E-26. Lajpat Nagar-I, New Delhi-110024. under Right to Information Act, 2005. Sir, The undersigned has received an application from Ms.Neha Sharma. d/o Shri Yash Gandhi, r/o E-26. Lajpat Nagar-I, New Delhi-110024. for providing of information under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

1. It has been informed that information sought by the applicant falls within your jurisdiction/office.

2. The application is, therefore, being forwarded to you for furnishing reply on the relevant points at the earliest for onward submission to the applicant.


(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy to:- Ms.Neha Sharma. d/o Shri Yash Gandhi, r/o E-26. Lajpat Nagar-I, New Delhi-110024 with the request to approach the Public Information Officer concerned for further correspondence.


RTI MATTER

MOST URGENT



F.No. ID No. 509 /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, Shri Ved Prakash Sharma, 25, Baldev Park,, Delhi-110051. Sub: Hearing of 1st

Appeal filed for the information under Right to Information Act supplied by the Public Information Officer

With reference to your application dated 28.04.2011 filed an appeal on the

subject cited above under Right to Information Act-2005; I am to inform you that

your appeal will be heard on 18.05.2011 at 3.30 p.m. in the chamber of Director,

Directorate of Prosecution, Room No.159, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

It is therefore requested that kindly make it convenient to attend the same

on the scheduled date and time. It is further added that in the event of non

presence, the case will be heard ex-parte and a decision on the same will be

communicated to you.

(Balbir Singh) State Public Information Officer




F.No. ID No. /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, Shri Rajeev Bharti, H.No.320, 320, Hastsal Gaon, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi . Sub; - Filing of 1st




your appeal will be heard on 03.05.2011at 3.00 p.m. in the chamber of Chief

Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.


on the scheduled date and time.

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer Directorate of Prosecution.



F.No. ID No. 461/RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To,

1. The Public information Officer, Home Deptt. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 5th

Delhi Secretariat,I.P.Estate, Level, C-Wing,

New Delhi-110002. 2. The Public Information Officer, O/o Divisional Commissioner cum Pr. Secretary (Revenue) Govt. of NCT of Delhi. 5-Sham Nath Marg, Delhi-110005. Sub: Notice of Hearing in Central Information Commission. . Sir, I am to inform you that Shri Masood Ahmad, C-1/50, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi has filed an application under Right to Information Act-2005 for seeking information. The information on point No.4 & 7 was to be provided to Home Deptt., for Govt. of NCT of Delhi and information on point No.9 to 14 was about of the application was about Shri Anupam Gaur, UDC, who is presently posted in office of Divisional Commissioner cum Pr. Secretary (Revenue) . The Under Secretary cum Dy. Registrar, Central Information Commission has issued a Notice of hearing (Copy enclosed for ready reference) in 2nd appeal filed by Shri Masood Ahmad, C-1/50, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi. The hearing is fixed for 20th

April 2011 at 2.30 p.m. in the office of Shri Shailesh Gandhi, Information Commissioner, at Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067.

As per para 4 of the Notice of hearing, it is advised that PIO is directed to communicate the date & time of hearing to any other officer whose assistance has been sought under section 5(4) of the RTI Act and ask to them to appear before the Commission on the said date & time. It is therefore, requested to kindly make it convenient to assist the PIO of this department on the scheduled date and time of hearing before Information Commission in Central Information Commission.

Yours faithfully,

(B.S.Kain)


Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above.

Shri Rajeev Bharti, H.No.320, 320, Hastsal Gaon, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.




F.No. ID No. 518 /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application received from Shri Kanhaiya Lal Seth, son of Late Shri Mangal Sain Seth under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Sir, The undersigned has received an application of Shri Kanhaiya lal Seth, s/o Late Managl Sain Seth, presently at Ward No.1, B-Block, Tihar Jail No.7, New Delhi -110064 from PIO, Delhi Legal Services Authority regarding for providing of information under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

6. The information sought by the applicant on point no. 1 to 7 does not falls within the jurisdiction of this department.



(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy to:- Shri Kanhaiya lal Seth, s/o Late Managl Sain Seth, presently at Ward No.1, B-Block, Tihar Jail No.7, New Delhi -110064 with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.




F.No. ID No. /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer Distt. & Session Courts, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application received from Shri H.K.Monga, r/o 703, Dr.Mukerjee Nagar, Delhi under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Sir, The undersigned has received an application dated 26.02.2011 of Shri H.K.Monga, r/o 703, Dr.Mukerjee Nagar, Delhi dated 31.01.2011 regarding for providing of information under the Right to Information Act, 2005.




(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy to:- Shri H.K.Monga, r/o 703, Dr.Mukerjee Nagar, Delhi with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.




F.No. ID No.518/RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer (Central), Distt. & Session Courts, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application received from Shri Kanhaiya Lal Seth S/o Late Shri Mangal Sain Seth under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Sir, The undersigned has received an application on of Shri Kanhaiya Lal Seth, s/o Late Mangal Sain Seth from PIO, Delhi Legal Services Authority, dated 31.01.2011 regarding for providing of information under the Right to Information Act, 2005.




(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy to:- Shri Kanhaiya Lal Seth S/o Late Shri Mangal Sain Seth, presently at Ward No.1, B-Block, Tihar Jail No.7, Delhi 110064 with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence. A copy of letter from Secretary, Delhi Legal Services Authority, Central District is also enclosed for information to the applicant.



GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI F.No. ID No698/RTI-5/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Avdesh Mittal, E-94, Greater Kailash, Part-I, New Delhi. Sub: - Information sought under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application dated 01.03.2011, received in this office on 03.03.2012, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you as per available record in this office is as under:-

‘The Case FIR No.180/08, PS, EOW is pending investigation with I.O. Inspector Vinod Gandhi, ALBC Sec.EOW. No scrutiny conducted in the above case till date’.

In case, you are not satisfied with the information provided by the Public Information officer of the department, you may file an appeal before the 1st

Appellate Authority i.e. Chief Prosecutor, Anti Corruption, Room No.174, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi within 30 days from the receipt of this letter.

(B.S.Kain)




GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI F.No. ID No.508/RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, o/o Distt. & Session Judge, Distt. North, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054. SUB: - Transfer of application in respect of Shri Ranjeet Singh Minhas, Sahkarita Bhawan, 31 to 34, Sector 2, Panchkula, under section 6 (3) of Right to Information Act-2005. Sir, Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by Shri Ranjeet Singh Minhas, Sahkarita Bhawan, 31 to 34, Sector 2, Panchkula, filing in the office of Ms.Sindhu Pillai, Dy. Commissioner of Police cum PIO, North District, Civil Lines and received in the office of undersigned on 14.12.2013, on the subject cited above.

1. The contents of the application have been gone through and it is found that the information sought by the applicant does not relates to this office.

2. It is observed that information sought in the application is closely related to your office. The copy of the application is being transferred under section 6(3) of Right to Information Act-2005 to you with the request that the information may directly be furnished to the applicant under intimation to the undersigned.

3. In case in the same is not related to you than the same may be further to the pubic authority which is closely connected with the subject.

Yours faithfully,

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer

Addl. Public Prosecutor. Encl. as above. Copy for information to Shri Ranjeet Singh Minhas, Sahkarita Bhawan, 31 to 34, Sector 2, Panchkula, with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.



1.Shri Rajiv Mohan, Addl. Public Prosecutor, with the request that information on point No.2, 3 & 4 sought by the applicant. A copy of the same is also transferred to you to look into the matter and the information sought may be furnished to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant. 2. Shri Mahender Nigam s/o Shri Ishwar Nath, Ward No.7, Central Jail No.3, Tihar, New Delhi.


GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI F.No. RTI Matters/Admn./DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054. Sub: - Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005 application of Shri Yogesh Narayan(ID No.625). Sir, With reference to your letter No.ID/625/RTI/DOP/2011/378, dated 11.11.2011, on the subject cited above, the information sought by the applicant on point No. 4, 5 and 6 pertaining to Administration Branch is as under:- Point No.4. The following Asstt. Public Prosecutors working in Directorate of Prosecution have left their services from the year 2004 onwards.

1. Shri Irshad Ahmad, 2. Shri Dhiraj Kumar, 3. Shri Ajit Singh, 4. Shri Aftaj Alam, 5. Shri Raju Srivastava, 6. Shri Vishal Singh, 7. Shri Neeraj Gautam, 8. Shri Sunil Kumar Sharma, 9. Shri Harshvardhan, 10. Shri Rajinder Singh, 11. Shri Ritesh Parashar, 12. Shri Vikas Goel, 13. Shri Yudhvir Singh Chahaun, 14. Shri Alok Dubey, 15. Shri Rakesh, 16. Shri Anand Jambulkar, 17. Shri Arvind Jangid, 18. Shri Lalit Kishore, 19. Shri Manish Garg, 20. Ms. Anchal, 21. Shri Rajinder Kumar, 22. Ms. Sheetal Choudhary, 23. Shri Shirajuddin Quershi,

Point No.5. As per recruitment rules, the Asstt. Public Prosecutors become eligible for promotion to the post of Addl. Public Prosecutors after completion of 07 years of regular service in the grade. However actual promotions are made as per availability of vacancies in higher grade subject to satisfactory work & conduct and after ascertaining that the officer is clear from vigilance angle. Point No.6. No time scale is given to Asstt. Public Prosecutors in this department.

Yours faithfully,

(RAJ KUMAR) OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT

ADMINISTRATION BRANCH



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Yogesh Kumar, c/o Pratidhi, Room No.41, 2nd

Shakarpur Police StationComplex, floor,

Pushta Road, Ramesh Park, Delhi-110092. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 23.10.2012 filed in the office undersigned, received on 26.10.2012 on the subject cited above, it is to inform you that the information sought by you has been collected from the concerned office and as per record the same is as under:-




To,

Shri Anil Dutt Sharma,

D-129, New Seelampur,

Delhi.


With reference to your application received in the office of

CPIO, 8th

Level, Delhi Sectt. And transferred to this office, the

relevant information has been called for from the concerned

authorities in respective district courts as per available records the

same is as under;-

Saket Court Complex:-

834 cases u/s 376 IPC and 783 cases u/s 498 IPC.

146 conviction and 322 acquittal u/s 376 IPC and 01 conviction & Nil

acquittal u/s 498-IPC.

01 case u/s 376 IPC.

67 cases were disposed u/s 376 IPC.

29 conviction & 38 acquittal u/s 376 IPC.

243 cases are pending prior to special courts designated u/s 376 IPC

258 cases of rape currently in special designated court of Delhi.

Tis Hazari Courts:

Rape cases from 2003 to Dec.2012 -306

Conviction 68 and acquittal 193

It cannot be determined whether complaint is false.

09 cases were decided by the Fast Track Court wherein 09 were

convicted and 43 were acquitted w.e.f January-2013.

As above.

162 cases are pending in 02 designated Courts at Tis Hazari, Delhi.

Rohini Court Complex:

Total cases u/s 498 of IPC from the year 2003 to till date:

2006= 590 cases,

2007= 611 cases,

2008= 442 cases,

2009= 196 cases,

2010= 287 cases,

2011= 398 cases,

in

The documents sought by you are the part of the judicial file.

You are accordingly advised to apply for providing of certified copies

from the Copy Branch of Distt. & Session Courts.

Photocopies of charge-sheet, list of witnesses, statement of

witnesses u/s 161 of Cr.P.C. Ballistic report and P.M. report as

available in record can be made available and contains 50 pages. If you

require the copies of the same, you are advised to deposit an amount of

Rs.100/- (Rs.2/- per page) with the AAO/DDO of the department as per

provisions of Right to Information Act-2005.

(B.S.KAIN)



..

OF THE PUPBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER: DELHI


F.No. ID No.307 /RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer/Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, Distt. West, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi

The Public Information Officer, Tihar Jail, New Delhi.

The Public Information Officer, Law, Justice & Legislative Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Secretariat, I.P.Estate,New Delhi.

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Vigilance, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Secretariat, I.P.Estate, New Delhi.

For point No.3,4,6,7, 9, 10 & 12

For Point No.5

For part of Point No.2

For Point No.11

Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Subodh Kumar Wadhwa, C-1, Ring Road, Naraina, New Delhi-110028 under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of Shri Subodh Kumar Wadhwa, C-1, Ring Road, Naraina, New Delhi-110028 under Right to Information Act-2005.




(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Subodh Kumar Wadhwa, C-1, Ring Road, Naraina, New Delhi-110028 under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.

(Balbir Singh) Public Information Officer, Asstt.Public Prosecutor

OF THE PUPBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER: DELHI DIRECTORATE OF PROSECTUION: DELHI


F.No. ID No.307 /RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, North District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Tarkeshwar Yadav, s/o Late Shri Hira lal Yadav, r/o M-95, Gali No.6, Shastri Nagar, Delhi-110052 under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Tarkeshwar Yadav, s/o Late Shri Hira lal Yadav, r/o M-95, Gali No.6, Shastri Nagar, Delhi-110052 under Right to Information Act-2005.




(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Tarkeshwar Yadav, s/o Late Shri Hira lal Yadav, r/o M-95, Gali No.6, Shastri Nagar, Delhi-110052 under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.






Shri S.S.Sandhu, IGP, Diretorate General, CRPF, CGO Complex, Lodhi

Road, New Delhi-110023, under Right to Information Act-2005

received in the office of Public Information Officer. The information

sought by the applicant pertains to your office.


sought in the application on the points may be forwarded within five

days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward


(Balbir Singh)



APIO through concerned Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge, Karkardooma






Shri Amlesh Gupta, R/o H.No.53-D, Pocket A-3, Kalkaji Extn. New

Delhi-110019, under Right to Information Act-2005 received in the

office of Public Information Officer. The information sought by the

applicant pertains on points No. 2, 3 & 4 to your office.





(Balbir Singh)



APIO through concerned Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge, Saket Courts

Complex, Delhi.




To,

Shri Rajbir Singh,

c/o Shri Sandeep Jain & Associates,

Advocates & Solicitors,

22, Ground Floor,

Besides PNB, Sardar Patel Marg,

Chankapuri, New Delhi.

Sub: - Furnishing of Information under Right to Information Act-2005.


Information Officer, Room No.204, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on the

subject cited above, received in the office of undersigned upon

transfer for furnishing information on the relevant points.

The information sought is not falls under the ambit of RTI Act.

So far as Naib Courts posted in the Courts, their duties and

responsibilities has been provided in Statute i.e. Punjab Police Rules.

The applicant may consult the relevant provisions of the aforesaid

Punjab Police Rules.

(Balbir Singh)



1st

Appellate Authority for filing appeal under RTI Act-2005.

Chief Prosecutor (North), Directorate of Prosecution, Room No. 174, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.



F.No. ID No.CIC/AD/C/2012/002549/ Dated:

To,

Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma,

C-2, Type-III,

Vivek Vihar Colony,

Delhi-110095.

Sub: - Furnishing of Information under Right to Information Act-2005.

In pursuance of orders dated 11.07.2013 ( received in this

office on 22.07.2013) from Information Commissioner (DS), it is

informed that the information on your application under Right to

Information Act-2005 has already been forwarded to you vide this

office letter No.RTI/2005/DOP, dated 28.09.2012 by Speed Post

copy enclosed for ready reference. However as per directions of 1st

1. As all the Law Officers/ DOP are holding regular post of gazetted

officers and no attendance of these officers is recorded/marked

in the office and therefore no attendance register is being

maintained.

Appellate Authority, the matter has been reconsidered and the

information on the points pertains to this department is furnished as

under:

5.Shri Vishnu Saran has looked after the work of DOP

25.06.2010.

6. No separate order for 25.06.2010 was issued by the

Competent Authority.

7. Since Shri B.S.Joon, has extended his leave, hence absence

cannot be treated as absent from duty.

8. Since the leave was extended by the officer, no communication

was sent to any authority.

9. Not applicable.

10. As above.

(Balbir Singh)



Copy for information to:-

1. 1st

Appellate Authority, Directorate of Prosecution, Room No.

174, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.





Shri S.C.Verma, Advocate, L-155 B, Dilshad Garden, Delhi-110095,

under Right to Information Act-2005 received in the office of Public

Information Officer. The information sought by the applicant pertains

to your office.





(Balbir Singh)









To,

Shri Madhu Sudan Dutta,

R/o 282, Pocket D-6,

Sector-6, Rohini,

Delhi-110085.

Sub: -Furnishing Information under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed in the office of the

Public Information Office of this Department on the subject cited

above, the information sought by you on the various points have been

called for from the concerned office and as per information received

as per available record of this office, the same is as under :_

1. No appeal has been filed in Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.

2. As at 1 above.

3. As above.

4. As above.

5. So far as the reasons for not filing the appeal is concerned, the

case was not recommended for filing of appeal against the

sentence order dated 17.10.2012 by the Addl. P.P and

concerned C.P./In-charge of respective Court. The case was

again referred for reconsideration. The case was recommended

as fit for appeal for enhancement of sentence by the P.P. Delhi.

The matter was referred to Law & Judicial Department, Govt. of

NCT of Delhi but Law & Judicial Department has not agreed

with the recommendation of the department and the matter was

returned with the remarks as not fit for appeal. The file was

forwarded to the Concerned Dy. Commissioner, Outer District

and the applicant is advised to approach concerned Dy.

Commissioner of Police, Outer District, if he desires so.

(Balbir Singh)



1St






To,

Shri Mukesh Garg,

R/o 528/6, Gali No.5,

Vishwas Nagar,


Sub: - Information sought under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application dated 17.06.2013, filed in the

office of PIO, North East Distt. Delhi Police and received in the office

of undersigned upon transfer for furnishing information on point No.

3,4 & 5, it is to inform you that the information have been called for

from the concerned office and as per available record the information

is as under:-

It is to inform you that in case FIR No.28/09, Police Station

Mansarovar Park u/s 186/332/353/34 has not been filed in the Court

till date.

(Balbir Singh)



1St






F.No. ID No.07/RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, District South, Houz Khas, New Delhi Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Kaushik Dey, B-10, Sagar Apartment, 6 Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Kaushik Dey, B-10, Sagar Apartment, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 in the office of undersigned upon transfer under Right to Information Act-2005.

1. On going through the contents of application, it has been observed that the information sought in the application of the applicant on point No.4, 5, 6 and 7 does not pertain to this department.

2. The application of the applicant is accordingly transferred to your office u/s 3 of Section 6 of Right to Information Act-2005 with the request that the information sought by the applicant on these points may be furnished to the applicant directly.


(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Kaushik Dey, B-10, Sagar Apartment, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.

(Balbir Singh) Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution,



F.No. ID No.5021/RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, Addl. Dy.Commissioner of Police, North East District, Seelampur, Delhi-110053. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Mukesh Garg, 528/6, Gali No.5, Vishwas Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi-110032, under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Mukesh Garg, 528/6, Gali No.5, Vishwas Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi, received in the office of PIO, Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, North East District, in the office of undersigned upon transfer under Right to Information Act-2005.

4. The concerned office of this department was requested to furnish the report on the relevant points, and it has been reported that no such record of the case is available in this office.




(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Shri Mukesh Garg, 528/6, Gali No.5, Vishwas Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi,with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.




F.No. ID No.5021/RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, Addl. Dy.Commissioner of Police, Special Cell, P.S. Lodhi Colony, New Delhi. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Parvez Noor, President, Anjuman Taazidaran Delhi State Taazia Committee (Regd.) 3583, Katra Dina Beg, Lal Kuan, Delhi-110006 under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Parvez Noor, President, Anjuman Taazidaran Delhi State Taazia Committee (Regd.) 3583, Katra Dina Beg, Lal Kuan, Delhi-110006 under Right to Information Act-2005.




(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Parvez Noor, President, Anjuman Taazidaran Delhi State Taazia Committee (Regd.) 3583, Katra Dina Beg, Lal Kuan, Delhi-110006 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.




F.No. ID No.3914 /RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, O/o Addl. Dy.Commissioner of Police, North District, Civil Lines, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Shiv Lal Singh, No.2717/Sec. H.M.Cell, Vinay Marg, Security Line, New Delhi under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Shiv Lal Singh, No.2717/Sec. H.M.Cell, Vinay Marg, Security Line, New Delhi under Right to Information Act-2005.




(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Shiv Lal Singh, No.2717/Sec. H.M.Cell, Vinay Marg, Security Line, New Delhi with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.




F.No. ID No.307 /RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, West District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar/Subzi Mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar/Subzi Mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 under Right to Information Act-2005.




(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar/Subzi Mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.




F.No. ID No.3629/RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, Addl. Dy.Commissioner of Police, West District, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Rajbir Singh, c/o Sandeep Jain & Associates, Advocates & Solicitor, 22, G.F. Besides PNB, Sardar Patel Marg, Chankya Puri, New Delhi under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Rajbir Singh, c/o Sandeep Jain & Associates, Advocates & Solicitor, 22, G.F. Besides PNB, Sardar Patel Marg, Chankya Puri, New Delhi under Right to Information Act-2005.

8. On going through the contents of application, it has been observed that the information sought in the letter of the applicant on point No.2 to 5 does not pertain to this department.



(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt.Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Rajbir Singh, c/o Sandeep Jain & Associates, Advocates & Solicitor, 22, G.F. Besides PNB, Sardar Patel Marg, Chankya Puri, New Delhi under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.

(Balbir Singh) Public Information Officer, Asstt.Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution,





To,

Shri George M.X.


Police Training College,

Jharoda Kalan, New Delhi-110072.


With reference to your application filed in the office of

undersigned on the subject cited above, the information sought as per

available record is as under:-

I. Shri Nishat Chikara, LDC is the dealing Asstt. Of the file of the

concerned officer.

II. The matter on the file was regarding drawl of arrears of pay for

the back period which requires some considerable time to

take a policy decision.

III. Shri Raj Kumar, Office Superintendent is the supervisor officer

of the dealing hand.

IV. After due consideration and consultation with the Asstt.

Accounts Officer of the department, it was decided that the

officer is presently on the strength of the Police Training

College, therefore the arrears of pay is to be drawn from the

present office.

V. The file was kept pending as the same involves financial

implication and time taken was unintentional.

VI. No action has been taken against the dealing hand and other

officers.

(Balbir Singh)



1St








To,

Shri S.C.Pandey,

R/o N-11A, Saket,

New Delhi-110017.


With reference to your application dated 17.06.2013, received

in this office of Public Information Officer, O/o Distt. & Session Judge,

Tis Hazari Courts, and received in this office of undersigned on the

subject cited above, it is informed that as per available record the file

was not received in this department for checking.

As per record, of the Court file, the reference in question was

forwarded to Court by the Investigation agency/ Delhi Police.

(Balbir Singh)



1St








To,

Shri Ram Pal,

H.No.8, Gali No.1,

A-Block, Pushta Road,,

West Karawal Nagar,

Delhi.



in this office of undersigned on the subject cited above, the

information sought by you on the points related to this department as

per available record in this office is as under:-

1. The accused was discharged on 20.02.2013 by the Court of

Ms.Nisha Saxena, Hon’ble ASJ, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.

Shri R.K.Pandey Addl. Public Prosecutor prepared discharge

report and opined that the order is fit for revision. The

matter was referred to Pr. Secretary; Law & Judicial vide

this office letter No.881/DOP/2013, dated 16/.03.2013 with

the opinion that it is a fit case for revision before the Hon’ble

High Court of Delhi. and was sent to Director of Prosecution

on 01.04.2013 vide D.R. 87. The same was returned back to

the concerned office on 01.04.2013 by office of Director of

Prosecution. DR, Police File, certified copy of Judgment and

all other relevant papers were sent to the office of the Dy.

Commissioner of Police, North East District for filing of

revision in the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.The proposal of

the department was approved by the Pr. Secretary, Law &

Justice Department vide diary dated 25.03.2013 and

complete file was received in the Director of Prosecution

and the same was marked to Dy. Commissioner of Police,

North East District for filing of revision in the Hon’ble High

Court of Delhi.

2. The point pertains to the office of D.C.P.North East District.

3. As at point 2 above.

4. The point pertains to Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.

5. The point pertains to the office of D.C.P.North East District

and Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.

6. As above.

7. As above.

8. Shri R.K.Pandey, Addl. Public Prosecutor has recommended

to file the revision petition against order 20.02.2013.

9. The point pertains to the office of D.C.P.North East District.

10. As above,

11. As above.

12. The point pertains to the office of D.C.P.North East District

and Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.

(Balbir Singh)



1St


Chief Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Distt. North,

Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts Complex, Delhi-110054.

This remaining point relates to office of Dy. Commissioner of

Police, North East District and applicant is advised to

approach for seeking information on the other points to the

concerned Public Authority.

(Balbir Singh)



1St




1. conducted in the above case till date’.

In case, you are not satisfied with the information provided by

the Public Information officer of the department, you may file an

appeal before the 1st

Appellate Authority i.e. Chief Prosecutor, Anti

Corruption, Room No.174, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT

of Delhi Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi within 30 days from the receipt of

this letter.

(B.S.Kain)






F.No. ID No.307 /RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, North District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Tarkeshwar Yadav, s/o Late Shri Hira lal Yadav, r/o M-95, Gali No.6, Shastri Nagar, Delhi-110052 under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Tarkeshwar Yadav, s/o Late Shri Hira lal Yadav, r/o M-95, Gali No.6, Shastri Nagar, Delhi-110052 under Right to Information Act-2005.




(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Tarkeshwar Yadav, s/o Late Shri Hira lal Yadav, r/o M-95, Gali No.6, Shastri Nagar, Delhi-110052 under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.






To,

Shri Rajiv Vaid,

S/o Shri H.P.Vaid,

246, Sunhari Bagh Apartment,

Sector13, Rohini, New Delhi-110085.



Information Act-2005, in the office of PIO, Home Department, and

received in this office of the undersigned on transfer, the relevant

information on point No.3 as per record is as under:-

“As per available record of this department, the retirement benefits

have not been released to Smt. Usha Mann, Ex. Chief Prosecutor till

date.”-

(B.S.KAIN)



1St




on 29.04.013, in the office of Public Information Officer, the

information on the relevant points has been called for from the

concerned authorities and as per available records the same is as

under:-

In the case in question the order of Shri Rakesh Tiwari, ASJ,

was opined for challenging in appeal. As per acquittal report dated

18.12.2010, the opinion that the case is fit for appeal was given by

Shri Sanjay Singh, Addl. P.P. who was posted in the respective Court

of ASJ as regular prosecutor was on medical leave.

In pursuance of letter No.F.3/Law/39/2011/0005151772, dated

22.02.2011, of Asstt. Legal Advisor, it is informed that appeal in this

case was recommended for filing and file was sent to D.C.P., Outer

District, for necessary action:-

(B.S.KAIN)



1St








To,

Smt.Saraswati Bhardwaj,

238, New Lyallpur,

Krishan Nagar,

Delhi-110051.




Information Officer, Saket District Courts, Saket New Delhi, received

in the office of undersigned on 01.05.2013 upon transfer it is informed

that the information has been called from the concerned functionary

and as per available records, point wise information is under:-

available with this department.




District as on 01.03.2012. 13 Naib Courts of South East Distt.

were posted in Session Courts on 01.03.2012.




District as on 08.04.2012.

7. All Naib Courts of Prosecution Branch works under Chief

Prosecutor/In-Charge of concerned District Courts and their

duty hours are from 10.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m.

8. The information sought by you contains 27 pages. You may

obtain copies of the said documents after depositing a fee of

Rs.54/- (Rs.2/- per page) as per provisions of Right to


(B.S.KAIN)



1St








To,

Shri Bharat Aggarwal,

32/3, South Civil Lines,

Arya Samaj Road,

P.S. Civil Lines,

Muzaffar Nagar, U.P.




Information Officer, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, New

Delhi, received in the office of undersigned on 15.05.2013 upon

transfer from Dy. Secretary (Home), Home (Police-II) Department,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi it is informed that the position is explained as

under:-

The information sought by the applicant is vague and

multifarious in nature and applicant has not mentioned any specific FIR

No. or any case No. instituted against Madan lal Verma, s/o Shri

Ramesh Chand Verma and Gaurav Verma @ Tinkoo, Punit Verma @

Pintoo, Amit Verma s/o Shri Madan Lal Verma, r/o H.No.32/1, 32/2,

Arya Samaj Road, South Civil Lines, Muzaffar Nagar, Pargana & Tehsil,

Sadar Zila, Muzaffar Nagar, U.P. and in the absence of same the

information cannot be provided by this office. Moreover, this

department is not the custodian of the information sought by the

applicant. The applicant may be advised to approach concerned Public

Authority i.e. District Authorities Muzaffar Nagar, U.P. mentioning

specific case/Suit No. for obtaining the information about the concerned

persons.

(B.S.KAIN)



1St








To,

Smt. Parveen Latha Awasthy,

B-39, Jagatpuri,

Delhi.



Information Officer, District Courts, Karkardooma, Delhi, and




record of this department, information as sought by you is as under:-

“As per office record Case FIR No.542/06 u/s 498-A/406/34, P.S.

Krishna Nagar in the matter of State v/s Vinay Awasthi & Ors.,

acquittal report was sent to Pr. Secretary, Law, Judicial &

Legislative Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide No.1323/DOP/2012,

dated 23.04.2012 and the file was received back with the remarks as

“ Not fit for appeal” and same was sent to Dy. Commissioner of

Police, East District, vide No.2150/DOP dated 15.05.2012”.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








Shri Madhu Sudan Dutta, H.No.282, Pocket D-6, Sector-6, Rohini,

Delhi-110085 under Right to Information Act-2005 received in the

office of Public Information Officer. The information sought by the

applicant pertains to your office.





(Balbir Singh)



APIO through concerned Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge, Rohini Courts

Complex, Delhi.



F.No. ID No.3160/RTI-2005/DOP/2013/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Lal

Bahadur, H.No.61, Saraswati Vihar, Nawab Garh Road, Dak Pathar, Dehradun,

Uttrakhad, under Right to Information Act-2005 for seeking information on under

Right to Information Act-2005.






Asstt. Public Information Officer through Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge, Rohini Courts Complex, Directorate of Prosecution.





To,


Tihar Jail No.4,

Jail Road,

New Delhi-110054.


With reference to your application filed in the office of Chief

Public Information Officer, Home (Police-II) Department, and




record of this department, on point No. 2, 3 & 4, information as

sought by you is as under:-

2. (i) & (ii) & (iii). No extra remuneration is paid for conducting

cases of Delhi Police as the officer is an employee of Govt. of NCT

of Delhi.

3. (i). An amount of Rs.6.90 lacs have been paid by C.B.I. in case

CBI-RC-2A/ACU-IX/2006 (Navy War Room Leak case).

(ii). No amount has been paid by CBI in case CBI-RC-AC-1-2012-

A-0012 (CBI v/s Abhishek Verma.

4. No extra remuneration is paid for conducting cases of Delhi Govt.

Delhi Police as the officer is an employee of Govt. of NCT of Delhi.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST




Shri Rajiv Mohan, Addl. Public Prosecutor has been withdrawn

from the case due to administrative reasons.

13. Directions were conveyed to Shri Rajiv Mohan, Addl. Public

Prosecutor with the approval of Pr. Secretary (Home) for

assigning Complaint case No.01/2012 of Shri Vivek Garg, v/s

Sheila Dixit & Ors in the Special Judge, ACB vide letter

No.F.8/632/2010/HP-II/1111, dated 19.02.2013 of Deputy

Secretary (Home), Govt. of NCT of Delhi. This case was later

on assigned to Shri R.S.Yadav, Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge,

Rohini Courts Complex with further directions Shri Sanjay

Soni, Addl. Public Prosecutor will assist the officer in the

aforesaid case vide Order No.1344/DOP/2013, dated

29.04.2013.

14. This is an administrative matter and it is not necessary to

consult with the investigation agency for withdrawing or

assigning the case to a particular officer.

15. There is no specified procedure, guidelines, rules & regulation

regarding the removal as well as appointment of Public

Prosecutor from or for a case.

16. There was no charge, complaint or allegations against Shri

Rajiv Mohan, Addl. P.P.

17. The Mobile number of Shri R.S.Yadav, In-Charge/Chief

Prosecutor, Distt. North at Rohini Courts is 98683-94512 and

Mobile Number of Shri Sanjay Soni Addl. Public Prosecutor at

Tis Hazari Courts Delhi 96507-94512.

18. The applicant is advised to obtain copies of letter and order

mentioned at point No.2, which are self explanatory.

19. There is no specific act/law for assigning/removing any officer

from a particular case.

20. There is no specific orders, directions recommendations in the

form of documents related to removal of P.P. from the said

case.

21. The orders are administrative in nature and no file noting is

available in record.

22. No orders/O.M.s, Directions approval, recommendations,

objections with the concerned offices are available in record.

23. As at point 12.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST




24. It is informed that as per report called from the

concerned Assistant Public Prosecutor from the Courts that in

Case FIR No.114/09, PS Model Town, no case has been filed in

the Court. However MHC® of PS Model Town was called with

the status report of the case vide DD No.23 dated 25.04.2013,

who appeared before the concerned officer and submitted that

the case has been cleared as untraced from the office of

concerned ACP and untraced report has been filed in the

Court. However the applicant is liberty to approach the

concerned PS as no final report filed in the court. The MHC®

also produced the photocopy of the same.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Punkit Satija,

C-105, Jail Road,

New Delhi-110064.







“As per report of Asstt. Public Prosecutor, the case FIR

No.757/99, dated 05.11.1999, P.S. Hari Nagar, u/s 283/290 IPC; it is

informed that the FIR has not been received by Prosecution. The

registers maintained regarding FIRs by the Prosecution Branch has

been checked but no entry for receipt/disposal of said FIR was found

in Registers”.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Priya Gaur,

Advocate,

WZ-23, 3rd

Shadipur,

Floor,

New Delhi-110008.







It is informed that as per report called from the concerned

Assistant Public Prosecutor from the Courts that in Case FIR

No.114/09, PS Model Town, no case has been filed in the Court.

However MHC® of PS Model Town was called with the status report

of the case vide DD No.23 dated 25.04.2013, who appeared before

the concerned officer and submitted that the case has been cleared

as untraced from the office of concerned ACP and untraced report

has been filed in the Court. However the applicant is liberty to

approach the concerned PS as no final report filed in the court. The

MHC® also produced the photocopy of the same.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Deepak Sharma,

Advocate,

Chamber No.85, B.G.S.Block,

Tis Hazari Courts,

Delhi-110054.







4. As per record, no appeal has been preferred against the

order/judgment of acquittal in question by this department.

5. Information sought is matter of record. Moreover, it has

been appreciated by Ld. Trial Court and a particular finding

has been given by it, hence need not to be reiterated.

6. Comments/information sought vide para 3 of the application

is purely a matter of appreciation of Hon’ble Court, whih

has already been done by the Ld. Trial court, hence cannot

be commented upon in the manner, it is sought.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST




.





To,

Shri Ashwani Arora,

r/o 1/641, Loni Road,







It is informed that information asked by you under Point No.1,3

& 5 is related to an order passed by the Court of Shri G.N.Pandey,

ACMM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 21.08.2012. No record is

available with Pr.Br. NE Distt.

The applicant is advised to obtain the further information from

the Court of Shri G.N.Pandey, ACMM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST







F.No. ID No.1715/RTI-05/DOP/

Dated:

To,

Shri Hukam Singh,

S/o Late Shri Prem Chand,

Village Gokulpur,

Delhi-110094 Nagar, New Delhi.






As regards FIR No.421/83, PS Seemapuri, FIR No.173/87, PS

Yamuna Vihar, FIR No.177/87, PS Yamuna Vihar, & FIR No.35/91, PS

Gukulpuri, it has been informed by the concerned Assistant Public

Prosecutors that these cases are very old and no record is available

with the concerned court. As regards Case FIR No. 358/06, PS

Gukulpuri, has been disposed of by the Court of Dr.Shahabuddin, MM

on 01.06.2009.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST






F.No. ID No. /RTI-05/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, North District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Deepak Sharma, Advocate, B-85, B.G.S.Blcok, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of Shri Deepak Sharma, Advocate, B-85, B.G.S.Blcok, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005, under Right to Information Act-2005.

10. On going through the contents of application, it has been observed that the information sought on point No.2 in the letter the applicant does not pertain to this department.

19. The application of the applicant is accordingly transferred to your office u/s 3 of Section 6 of Right to Information Act-2005 with the request that the information sought on point No.2 by the applicant may be furnished to the applicant directly.


(B.S.Kain)


3. Shri Deepak Sharma, Advocate, B-85, B.G.S.Blcok, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005, under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.






To,

Shri G.D.Parashar,

R/o C-114, First Floor,

Fateh Nagar, New Delhi.






No case FIR No.757/09 dated 05.11.1999, PS Hari Nagar; u/s

283/290 IPC was filed in the concerned Court of PS Hari Nagar.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Shri Madan Gopal Gupta,

S/o Shri B.B.Gupta,

A-17, Vivek Vihar,

Phase-I, Delhi.



25.04.2013, on the subject cited above, the information has been


record of this department, the point wise information as sought by

you is as under:-

3. No appeal in cases pertaining to u/s 498-A/406 IPC with the

area of Distt. Courts complex, Karkardooma i.e. East, North

East & shahdara Distt. has been filed during the period 1st

January 2011 to 10th

4. As regards information on the application of Dr. Samita Gupta

r/o 41, Shalimar Park, Shahdara, Delhi regarding cancellation

of anticipatory bail, of accused Dr.M.G.Gupta in case FIR

No.29/2011 u/s 498-A/406/34, IPC, PS Farash Bazar, on the

recommendations of concerned Prosecuting Officer and In-

Charge/Chief Prosecutor was received in this department vide

Diary No.325/CP/East, dated 07.03.2013 and with further

recommendations through Director of Prosecution was sent to

Pr. Secretary (Law & Judicial) vide Diary No.815/DOP, dated

11.03.2013 and the same was received back with the remarks

as “ Fit for revision” and the file was sent to Dy. Commissioner

of Police, Distt. East vide Diary No.1103/DOP, dated

19.03.2013 for further necessary action at their end.

April 2013.

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST






To,

Shri Birender Sangwan,

Bar Room No.2, IInd Floor,

Rohini Courts,

Delhi-110085.



Information Officer, D.C.P.Office, Pitampura, Delhi on the subject

cited above, the information on points related to this office as per

available record is furnished as under:-

The Naib Courts are deployed in Prosecution Branch by the Dy.

Commissioner of Police of the respective district.

Point No. 4.

There are no specific guidelines in this regard. However the transfer

policy is at the discretion of the D.C.P. Concerned and more over the

transfer of Naib Court from Court to Court is within the purview of

Chief Prosecutor of the district concerned.

Point No. 5.

Police officers posted in MM Courts or session courts are deployed

by the concerned In-Charge/Chief Prosecutor of the District.

Point No.10.

The Naib Court is deployed for duty in the MM Court and Session

Court by the Chief Prosecutor/In-Charge of the Court. The Naib

Court is shifted from one court to another from time to time by the

In-Charge/Chief Prosecutor of Distt.Court. A copy of Naib Courts

deployed for duty at Rohini Courts is attached.

Point No. 11.

So far as the transfer of Naib Court is at the discretion of In-Charge/

Chief Prosecutor concerned and they are transferred from one court

to another court from time to time.

Point No.12.

It relates to Delhi Police.

Point No.13.

Time & Work of police officers deployed in the courts are from 9:30

a.m. to till courts hours.

Point No.14.

Attendance of all police officers posted as naib courts are marked in

the attendance register of concerned Distt. And the same remains in

the custody of concerned Chief Prosecutor.

Point No. 15

(B.S.KAIN)



1ST








To,

Ms.Rattan Deep Kaur,

13-B, Sector-15-A,

Super Deuxe Flats,

Noida, UP.






Point No.1.



Point No.2.



Point No.3.

A complete set of documents containing 24 pages has already been

forwarded by this office vide letter No.DOP/2013/569-570, dated

22.02.2013 in continuation of this office letter No.F.1(1(144)/DOP/2-

13/485-486, dated 22.02.2013.

Point No.4.

The copy of order dated 26.04.2012 and copy of letter No. dated

03.01.2013 containing 2 pages is enclosed.

Point No.5.





To,

Ms.Usha Mann,

13-B, Sector-15-A,

Super Deuxe Flats,

Noida, UP.






Point No.1, 2 & 3.



Point No.4.



Point No.5.

The complaint dated 11.02.2011 of Shri Rajiv Vaid, alleging

appearance in Hon’ble High Court of Delhi was marked by Director

of Prosecution to Vigilance Officer of the Department. A copy of

complaint containing 02 pages and copy of the same is enclosed. It

is the internal arrangement of the department to designate an officer

as Vigilance Officer of the department to conduct preliminary inquiry

upon receipt of complaint against an officer/official of the

department. The Vigilance Officer of the department has conducted

preliminary inquiry. The complaint of the officer was received when

the officer was on the strength of the department.

Point No.6.

As per Office Order No.11/21/2007/DOP/HP-II/4706-4716, dated

04.08.2009 from Dy. Secretary (Home), (Photocopy enclosed)

wherein it has been mentioned that the period of absence from

March 2007 to 03.05.2009 will be decided later on which clearly

shows that the officer was absence from duty.

Point No.7 & 8.

No information is sought and clarification if any is not within the

ambit of RTI Act-2005.

Point No.9 & 10.

Photocopy of letter No.F.1(144)/DOP/Estt./2635, dated 05.10.2012

containing 03 pages and copy of letter No.F.11/4/12/DOP/HP-I/1250,

dated 21.09.2012 of Dy. Secretary (Home-I) containing 01 page

whereby this department was requested to send the relevant file

with para-wise comments for placing the same for the perusal of

Hon’ble Lt.Governor, Delhi.

Point No.11.

The Service Book of the officer was forwarded to Home Department

along-with para-wise comments in order to complete the reference

in question as the service book is primary requirement for fixation of

pay of the officer.

Point No.12.

Copy of letter dated 17.08.2012 containing 01 page is enclosed.

(B.S.KAIN)




Encl. 16 pages.





To,

Ms.Usha Mann,

13-B, Sector-15-A,

Super Deuxe Flats,

Noida, UP.






Point No.1.

Shri Bhagwan Singh was holding the post of Head of Department/

Head of office from August 2009 to 30.06.2010.

Shri B.S.Joon is holding the post of Head of Department from

01.07.2010 to till date. The officer was also holding the post of Head

of office from 01.07.2010 to 30.09.2010. Thereafter Shri Sanjay Soni

was assigned duties of Head of Office from 01.10.2010 to till date.

Shri S.Roy Biswas, Office Superintendent was holding the post of

DDO in the month of August 2009. Shri M.Raghu AAO,was holding

the post of DDO from 15.10.2009 to 28.02.2011. Shri Sanjay Soni

was assigned the duties of DDO from 03.03.2011 to 27.03.2011. Shri

Unmesh Pahade, Office Superintendent was assigned duties of DDO

from 28.03.2011 to 08.04.2011. Shri R.K. Aggarwal , AAO was

assigned the duties of DDO from 18.05.2011 to 06.01.2013. Shri

Arjesh Kumar, AAO is presently working as DDO of the department

from 07.01.2013 to till date.

Shri S.Roy Biswas Office Superintendent remained posted in this


Shri K.S.Dhama, Office Superintendent remained posted in this


Shri Unmesh Pahade, Office Superintendent remained posted in this


Shri Raj Kumar, Office Superintendent is posted in this department

from 08.04.2011 to till.

Point No.2

Copy of order dated 10.07.2010 and 23.09.2011 is enclosed.

Point No.3.

No such file/record is available in this Directorate.

Point No.4, 5 & 6.

No such file or record is available in this Directorate.

Point No.7 & 8.

The photocopy of file as per available records is enclosed.

Point No.9.

(a). 11.06.2008 from PFA to DOP

(b). No communication is available in record.

(c). As above.

(d). 13.08.2012 from Home Department to DOP,

(e). 05.10.2012 from DOP to Home Department,

(f). 07.11.2012 from Home Department to DOP.

(g). 22.12.2012 from DOP to PFA Department.

Point No.10.

The officer upon joining was posted in Anti Corruption Branch of

Directorate of Vigilance, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide order No.1

(144)/DOP/2007/1027-1030, dated 09.04.2007. (Photocopy enclosed.

Point No.11&12.

Photocopy of official note sheet containing 6 pages is enclosed.

Point No.13.

This office is having 05 files available in record and all the files are

numbered 1(144)/DOP/2007, 1(144) DOP/2012 and are personal files

of the officer by name.

(B.S.KAIN)




Encl. 16 pages.

As above.

(d). 13.08.2012.

(e).

With reference to The undersigned has received an application from PIO/Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police-I, North District, Civil Lines, Delhi for furnishing information on point No.2 under Right to Information Act-2005.

9. The information sought by you is not available in this department. The same might be in the judicial file or Police file as cancellation of FIR is in between the Investigation agency and respective Court.

(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Copy for information to:- Public Information Officer/Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police-I, North District, Civil Lines, Delhi with reference to letter No.3118/ID No.394/2013/RTI Cell, North District, Delhi dated 11.03.2013 with the request that the required information may be provided from the record of the respective Police Station.




F.No. ID No.2979/RTI-2005/DOP/2013/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Anil Dutt Sharma, D-129, New Seelampur, Delhi, received by transfer from the office of Dy. Secretary ( Admn.)/Public Information Officer, O/o Law Justice & Legislative Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, for seeking information on under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the application of the applicant may kindly be gone through and information in this matter may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



The Reader to P.P., Tis Hazari Courts, In-charge/Chief Prosecutor, Rohini Courts, Patiala House Courts, Saket Courts, Dwarka Courts, Karkardooma Courts, C.P. West District & Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Directorate of Prosecution



F.No. ID No.2788/RTI-2005/DOP/2012/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Punkit

Satija, C-105, Jail Road, New Delhi-110064, under Right to Information Act-2005

received in the office of Public Information Officer, for seeking information on







The In-Charge/CP, West Distt., Tis Hazari, Directorate of Prosecution.




To,

Ms. Usha Mann,









documents.

(B.S.KAIN)






To,

Ms. Usha Mann,

13-B, Super Deluxe Flats ,




27.02.2013 on the subject cited above, the information sought contain

ns 11 pages. You are accordingly advised to deposit an amount of

Rs.22/- with the AAO/DDO of this department as per provisions of


documents.

(B.S.KAIN)





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated:

To,

Shri Puneet Kumar,

S/o Shri Rajinder Prasad Vashisth,

8/75, Sector-3, Rajender Nagar,

Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, U.P.


With reference to your application filed in the office

undersigned on the subject cited above, the point wise information as

per available records is as under:-

.

7. A complaint dated 06.08.2012 against Shri Naveen Gaur, Head

Constable r/o F-4/123-124, Sector-16, Rohini, Delhi was

received in this office. The same was sent to In-charge/Chief

Prosecutor of the concerned court for comments.

8. Preliminary investigations were conducted. To conduct any kind

of raids on the basis of complaints is not in the jurisdiction of

this department.

9. No specific instructions are available on record.

10. Shri Naveen Gaur is presently posted in North West district of

Rohini Courts Complex. No specific information about his

previous posting in this Court is available in this department.

11. No such record is available in this department and as per CCS

(Conduct) Rules only Gazetted Officers are required to furnish

Annual Property Returns.

(B.S.KAIN)









To,

Shri Tarkeshwar Yadav,

S/o Late Shri Heera Lal Yadav,

M-95, Gali No.6, Shastri Nagar,

Delhi-110052.

Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005.


Information Pfficer/Addl. Dy.Commissioner, North District, Delhi and

transferred to the undersigned on 06.04.2013 the subject cited above,

the information as per available records is as under:-

.

The case Diary is a privileged communication in between the

State and Investigation Agency and not in the ambit of Right

to Information Act-2005. Hon’ble Court can only see the

Case Diary.




12. Prosecutor2on the , tof Hon’ble Justice of Fast Track Court, on

the subject cited above, the information sought by you is a

privileged communication in between the State and Investigation

agency and cannot be disclosed as under Right to Information

Act-2005 and as per orders of Hon’ble Trial Court. Section

228-A of Code of Criminal Procedure, reads as under.

If after such consideration, and hearing as aforesaid, the Judge is

of the opinion that there is ground of presuming that the accused has

committed an which, is not exclusively triable by the Court of Session,

he may, frame a charge against the accused and, by order, transfer the

case for trial to Chief Judicial Magistrate (or any other Judicial

Magistrate of the first class and direct the accused to appear before the

Chief Judicial Magistrate, or, as the case may be, the Judicial

Magistrate of the first class on such date as he deem fit, and thereupon

such Magistrate) shall try the offence in accordance with the procedure

for the trial of Warrant cases instituted on a Police report.

(B.S.KAIN)






++ OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION: DELHI


F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, Sui Juris India, 507, Rohit House, Tolstoy Marg, Cannuaght Place, New Delhi-110001. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application received in the office in the office of

undersigned on the subject cited above, the position of the information sought by

you on points as per available record is as under:-

This office is not the custodian of the information sought by you. You

are advised to apply to the concerned Public Authority/Public Information

Officer in the department in accordance with the instructions contained in

O.M.No. dated 24.09.2010 of Govt. of India, Department of Personnel &

Training.

(B.S.KAIN)







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Smt. Usha Mann, H.No.13, Super Deluxe Flats, Sector-15-A, Noida-201301. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 18.01.2013, in the name of Public

Information Officer, office of Chief Secretary, Delhi and received in this office on

30.01.2013, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you as per

available record in this office is as under:-

It is informed that Shri Suresh Chand Sharma, Chief Prosecutor

Central Distt. has been nominated as Nodal Officer of the department in all

Misc. matters as per record.

(B.S.KAIN)







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2013/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Mrs. Pooja, r/o Plot No.3 A, 1st

Floor, Yograj Colony, Near Nirankari Sarover, Delhi received from the office of Public Information Officer, North District, Civil Lines, Delhi for seeking information on point No.2 under Right to Information Act-2005.

The contents of the letter may be gone through and information in this matter may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



The Reader to PP,Delhi. Directorate of Prosecution



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an orders of the 1st

No.41, 2

Appellate Authority issued an application of Shri Yogesh Kumar,c/o Pratidhi, Room

nd

Delhi-110092. under Right to Information Act-2005. floor, Shakarpur Police StationComplex, Pushta Road, Ramesh Park,

The appeal is remanded back to the Public Information Officer for furnishing information on Point No.2 & 3. The information on point No.3 pertains to your office. The contents of the aforesaid order may kindly be looked into and supplementary information in this matter may be forwarded to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



Reader to DOP, Directorate of Prosecution


F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Hari Ram, No.2639/East, P.S.Pandav Nagar, Delhi, seeking information of cases relating Excise Act under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the letter may be gone through and information in this matter may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



The APIO, Through C.P./Incharge, Karkardooma Courts, Directorate of Prosecution



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Amrik Singh, 10196/15, Jhandewalan Mandir, New Delhi-110055. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 06.11.2012, in the office of PIO, Delhi Police, North District, received in this office on 04.12.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you as per available record in this office is as under:-

It is informed that no copy of any decision or order in the FIR No.544/92 dated 28.04.1992 of Hon’ble Court is available in this office and the same is within the custody of appropriate Court. In case any copy or order of decision is desired, you are advised to apply for certified copy in the appropriate Court.







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Tirath Ram, C/o DG-III/217, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 26.10.2012, in the office of PIO, Delhi Police, received in this office on 07.12.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you on point No. 8 as per available record in this office is as under:-

It is informed that there is no Appellate Authority in case of dissented legal opinion made by Director of Prosecution and the same is final.






F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Jamshed Ali, S/o Shri Nasibuddin, H.No.C-95, Gali No.10, Sudamapuri, Gamri Extn. Delhi-110053. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 04.12.2012, in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information sought by you on point No. 1 to 6 as per available record in this office is as under:-

It is informed that no complaint of dated 26.06.2012 against Shri Dharmendra Sharma, r/o H.No.C-52/40 , A-Block, Gali No.6, Gamri Extn. Delhi has been received in this office. If any complaint is received against any officer/official, a preliminary inquiry is conducted by the Vigilance Officer of the department and in case of the complaint is proved as per documents available with the Inquiry Officer, an action as deemed fit is taken by the concerned authority. As the complaint against the aforesaid official has not been received in this office no further course of action by the authorities can be communicated.







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information regarding details of earned leave applied and refused to you from 01.06.2011 to till date are as under: - Sanctioned leaves:- 03 days from 21.11.2012 to 23.11.2012, 09 days from 29.11.2012 to 07.12.2012, Leave not accepted: 04.09.2012 to 01.10.2012 90 days earned leave from 24.09.12 to 22.12.2012, 30 days earned leave from 30.10.2012, 90 days earned leave from 16.11.2102, The Director of Prosecution is the authority competent to accept or reject the earned leave of the officers of this department.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information regarding details of officers i.e. Director, Chief Prosecutor, Addl. PPs & APPs to whom earned leave have been granted with periods and respective grounds with periods sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you is personal information and the same is exempted from disclosure under section 8(j) of Right to Information Act-2005 as this relates to personal information and the disclosure of the same has no relationship to any public activity or interest as it would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy of the individual.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information as per available records of details of communications and various notes/Memos/minutes of the meeting of Chief Prosecutors & communication to Health Deptt. Of Govt. of NCT of Delhi sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you is voluminous and multifarious in nature and cannot be supplied in manner desired by you. you are hereby advised to raise specific issues/points on which information is required so that the same can be supplied to you.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012,filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information as per available records of your past ad-hoc Service from 06.06.95 to 09.08.99 sought by you is as under:- The Service Book for the period in question is not with the department as per available records.



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012,filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information as regard to Service Book of the officer sought by you is as under:- The Service Book of the officer has not been received from the office of Registrar of Companies, Govt. of India, Mumbai till date as per record of this office.



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012,filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on details of officers to whom earned leave have been granted with periods sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you cannot be disclosed under section 8 (j) of Right to Information Act-2005 as this relates to personal information the disclosure of the same has no relationship to any public activity or interest as it would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy of the individual.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer of this office on the subject cited above, the information on grounds and purposes for grant of earned leave sought by you is as under:- This is not specifically mentioned in the CCS (Leave) Rules that on what grounds or purposes earned leave can be granted to APPs. It is clearly mentioned that leave cannot be claimed by a Government servant as a matter of right. This is the discretion of the authority to refuse or accept the request for grant of leave as per administrative feasibility.



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012, filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on Copies of various complaints received against Shri B.S.Joon, Directorate of Prosecution from the date of his appointment as APP sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you cannot be disclosed under section 8 (j) of Right to Information Act-2005 as the information sought by you is personal information and the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity and it would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy of individual.

(B.S.KAIN)


1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: May please find enclosed herewith a copy of orders of 1st Appellate Authority in an appeal filed by Shri Anwar Ahmad, under Right to Information Act-2005. The 1st

Appellate Authority has accepted the appeal of the applicant partly and remanded back to PIO on point No.1, 5 & 6 to submit the information. The Information sought by the applicant on these points is as under:-

2. How many cases have been sent to Smt. Reeta Dutta for opinion a Chief Prosecutor till date? Give details also.

(B.S.KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER

ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.

APIO through C.P./In-charge of Karkadooma Courts, Saket Courts & Patiala House with the request that the requisite information as per available records may be furnished to this office for onward submission to the applicant.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, C-2, Type-III, Police Colony, P.S.Vivek Vihar, Delhi-. Sub; - Furnishing information under RTI Act-2005 as per orders of 1st


In compliance of orders dated 17.11.2012 of 1st

Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act-2005, it is to inform you that the information on point No.3 cannot be disclosed being personal information of complainant and the concerned person has given in writing that the same shall not be disclosed as per provision of

As regards on point No.7.13 of the appeal the report was marked by Director of Prosecution to the Vigilance Officer as preliminary inquiry in the case of any complain t is conducted by the officer being departmental Vigilance Officer.




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Harish Chahaun. B-58,Amrit Puri, N.D.S.E., Part-I, New Delhi. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005. It is to inform you that one Shri Manoj Kumar Shama, Inspector, Delhi Police an applicant has filed an application under Right to Information Act and sought copy of complaint and statement recorded by the Vigilance officer, Directorate of Prosecution on 20.01.2010 for complaint against certain officers of Delhi Police lodged on 15.12.2009. You are therefore advised to intimate whether the copy of statement may be made available to the applicant under Right to Information Act-2005 within 5 days. In case no intimation is received it will be presumed that you are having no objection for furnishing copy of statement and the same will be made available to the applicant without any further communication.


Addl. Public Prosecutor, 11irectorate of Prosecution

East District


-- -- --

Total 05 81 23 Convicted -- 01 03 Acquittal -- 31 16 Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal -- 32 19 % of conviction 3.12% 15.78%

North District

2010 2011 2012 Fresh received 12 -- -- Transferred -- -- -- Sent back to the court from where it was transferred

-- -- --

Total 12 -- -- Convicted -- -- -- Acquittal -- -- 04 Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal -- -- 04 % of conviction -- -- --

West District


-- -- --

Total 24 13 33 Convicted -- 03 05 Acquittal 13 02 08 Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal 13 05 13 % of conviction 66.6% 38.46%

Central District


-- -- --

Total 07 08 02

Convicted -- -- 01 Acquittal -- -- -- Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal -- -- 01 % of conviction -- -- 100%

North East District.


-- -- --

Total 10 48 38 Convicted -- 07 07 Acquittal -- 17 21 Discharge -- -- -- Total disposal -- 24 28 % of conviction 29.16% 25%

South East District


-- -- --

Total 44 70 80 Convicted 22 36 32 Acquittal 06 20 11 Discharge -- -- 01 Total disposal 28 56 44 % of conviction 78.57% 64.28% 72.72%

South District


-- -- --

Total 29 49 25 Convicted 03 04 02 Acquittal 13 25 17 Discharge 01 02 -- Total disposal 17 31 19 % of conviction 17.64% 12.90% 10.52%

South West District

2010 2011 2012

Fresh received 21 28 23 Transferred -- -- 05 Sent back to the court from where it was transferred

-- -- --

Total 21 28 28 Convicted -- -- 10 Acquittal -- -- 04 Discharge -- -- 01 Total disposal -- -- 15 % of conviction -- -- 62.5%

2. Most of the cases are of sexual assault and kidnapping with minors. 5. No such information is available as per record. 6. This may be treated as NIL.

(B.S.KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER/


1ST

Appellate authority under Right to Information Act-2005.


:“As per record of this office an acquittal report regarding Case FIR

No.74/11 u/s 498-A, 306, 34 IPC, PS Anand Vihar, State v/s Sanjeev Kukreja @ Kukku, bearing No.217-A, dated 20.12.2011 was sent to Director of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 21.12.2011 and was recommended not found fit case for Appeal and the same was sent back to the DCP, East District on 06.02.2012.

(B.S.KAIN)







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Sanjeev Kukreja, 162, Jagriti Enclave, Delhi-110092. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 06.11.2012 filed in the office undersigned, on the subject cited above, it is to inform you that the information sought by you has been collected from the concerned office and as per record the same is as under:- “As per record of this office an acquittal report regarding Case FIR No.74/11 u/s 498-A, 306, 34 IPC, PS Anand Vihar, State v/s Sanjeev Kukreja @ Kukku, bearing No.217-A, dated 20.12.2011 was sent to Director of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 21.12.2011 and was recommended not found fit case for Appeal and the same was sent back to the DCP, East District on 06.02.2012.







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Shashi Kant Gaur, Inspector, Qtr.No.2, Type-IV, Police Colony, Delhi-110051. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application filed in the office undersigned, on the subject cited above, it is to inform you that the information sought by you as per record is as under:- “The information sought by you is a privileged communication in between the state and the investigation agency and its disclosure may affect investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders hence the same cannot be disclosed under Indian Evidence Act.”






F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Yogesh Kumar, C/o Pratidhi, Room No.41, 2nd

Shakarpur Police Station Complex, Floor,

Pusta Road, Ramesh Park, Delhi-110092. Sub: 1st

appeal under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed in the office of 1st Appellate

Authority, on the subject cited above, in continuation of this office letter of even

number dated 04.01.2013, it is to inform you that the appeal filed will be heard on

21.01.2013 at 3.00 p.m. in the office of 1st

Appellate Authority, Room No.174,

Directorate of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

You are therefore advised to make it convenient to attend the same on the

scheduled date and time.



the information on the various points as per record is as under:- Point No.1 & 2. It is informed that copy of letter No.1022/Complt./Outer District/, dated 08.06.2012 was received in this office along-with enclosures, i.e. report submitted by Inspector, ATO, Prashant Vihar, and application of the applicant dated 03.05.2012, regarding complaint against Smt. Usha Mann, Retired Chief Prosecutor. The reference in question has been forwarded to Pr. Secretary (Home), Home (Police) Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, vide letter No.1910/DOP/2012, dated 25.06.2012 for information and further appropriate action in the matter.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 05.10.2012, received in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on the various points as per record is as under:-

4. As per available record, No service book received from Registrar of Companies. Mumbai is available in this office.

5. Copies of the extracts from Service Book of the officer, onwards 01.07.2009 is enclosed.

6. (a). Director of Prosecution being the competent authority has marked the enquiry to the officer being Vigilance Officer of the department. (b).The copies of the same cannot be supplied being confidential documents and .the enquiry is not concluded yet. (c ). Copies of orders of competent authority on applications dated 04.09.2012 and 24.09.2012. Statement of Lady APPS posted in various courts. Tis Hazari Courts:- (i). Ms.Reeta Sharma, (ii). Ms. Zauiba Majid, (iii). Ms.Poonam Singhal, (iv). Ms. Subhra Goel, Saket Courts complex (i). Ms.Jyotsana Sharma, Karkardooma Courts: (i). Ms. Anju Rathi Rana, (ii). Ms. Anupama Singh, Rohini Complex, (i). Ms. Nimmi Sisodia, (ii). Ms. Suchitra Singh, (iii). Ms. Raj Rani Sharma, (iv). Ms. Garima Gupta, (v). Ms. Kiran Bala Dwarka Court Complex (i). Ms. Anuradha Sharma, (ii). Ms. Vandana Chahaun,T

Names of APPs posted in Mahila Courts. (i). Ms.Poonam Singhal, Central Distrcit (ii). Ms. Shubra Goel, Mahila Court-I, (iii). Shri A.K.Saxena, Mahila Court-II, (iv). Shri Kumar Sanjay, Mahila Court-III. (v). Shri N.K.Verma, Mahila Court, SE Distt-I (vi). Shri Jagdamba Pandey, Mahila Court-II (vii). Shri Honey Goel, Mahila Court, N.D. (viii). Shri Gyanendra Kumar Shukla-I Mahila Court, East District. (ix). Shri Gayender Kumar Shukla-II, Mahila Court (x). Shri Vikas kumar, Mahila Court, NE-I, Distt. (xi). Shri Rahul Sharma, Mahila Court-2, (xii). Ms. Suchitra Singh, Mahila Court, North West, (xiii). Parveen Kumar, Outer District, (xiv). Ms. Vandana Chahaun, Mahila Court-II (xv). Shri Pankaj Kumar Ranga, Mahila Court-I



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Ms. Krishana Walia, W/o Shri Ram Chandar Walia, r/o H.No.1377, Badshahi Bagh, Ambala City. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 25.10.2012 , received in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on point No.1 as per record is as under:- The point is legal one and is not in the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005. A Government servant can be prosecuted as per directions and orders of Hon’ble Court as per provisions of CCS (Conduct) Rules. As regards to obtaining copy of the orders of Hon’ble Court, the applicant is advised to apply in the appropriate Court with details of the case No. and title of the case for providing copy of the order.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 04.10.2012, received in the office on 11.10.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on the various points as per record is as under:- 1 The desirable qualification for the post of Asstt. Public Prosecutor is experience as Government advocate. 2. The question raised by the applicant on this point is legal one as the same is not in the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005.



1st




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Anwar Ahmad, S/o Shri Mohd. Bashir, R/o 1154, Choori Walan, Jama Masjid, Delhi. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 04.10.2012, in the office of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on the various points as per record is as under:-

“The Inquiry has been completed by the Vigilance Officer of the Department. The Vigilance Officer has come to the conclusion that the complaint has failed to produce any corroborative evidence in support of his allegations. The report in original of the Vigilance Officer, written submission of the complaint and explanation of Ms.Reeta Dutta, Chief Prosecutor dated 29.08.2012 and 01.09.2012 has been forwarded to Pr. Secretary (Home), Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide letter No.2558/DOP/2012, dated 05.09.2012”.







F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Jai Bhagwan, Inspector, 3043, Presently posted in Security, Parliament Security Unit. Sub: Filing of 1st


In pursuance of Orders of 1st

It is submitted that the letter No.2868 dated 11.07.2012 is received in the

office of Director of Prosecution for comments in the matter. A reply on the

above said letter was given by concerned Addl. P.P. on 20.07.2012 to the office

of P.P. Delhi. The same was forwarded by P.P.Delhi of Director of Prosecution

on 20.07.2012. The same was sent to Addl. Secretary, Home (General) vide

letter No.2184 on 21.07.2012.

Appellate Authority, dated 17.10.2012, on the

subject cited above, the information has been obtained from the concerned office

and as per available record the same is reproduced as under:-

Another letter No.4086, dated 14.09.2012 is received in this directorate

for moving the application u/s 321 of Cr.P.C and application u/s 321 Cr.P.C.

moved by Addl. P.P. and a report of the above letter is sent to Dy. Secretary

(Home) vide letter No.3009/DOP/12, dated 17.10.2012 and next date of hearing

is fixed for consideration and argument on charge is 19.11.2012.

No other record is available in the office of Director of Prosecution and

all record in this matter has been forwarded to office of Dy. Secretary (Home).

(B.S.Kain)




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, C-2, Type-III, Police Colony, P.S.Vivek Vihar, Delhi-. Sub: Filing of 1st


With reference to your 1st

Appeal filed in the office of Chief Prosecutor,

North, on the subject cited above, an application under Right to Information Act, It

is informed that your appeal will be heard on 25.10.2012 at 3.00 p.m. in the chamber

of Chief Prosecutor, North, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

You are therefore advised to attend the office of 1st

Appellate Authority, on



Addl. Public Prosecutor.,



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Manoj Kumar Sharma, C-2, Type-III, Police Colony, P.S.Vivek Vihar, Delhi-. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005 as per

orders of 1st


In pursuance of orders of 1st

Appellate Authority, the information on Point No.11 & 12 has been collected from the concerned functionaries and as per available record of the office the same is reproduced as under: -

“ It is informed that said complaint was anonymous and as per CVC

guidelines no action could be taken on such complaints. The allegations

contained in the complaint were not verified due to the reason that it was an

anonymous complaint. Moreover the matter was sub-judice and action could be

taken against the office if there are any adverse remarks against the concerned

Addl. P.P. by the Court. It is also clarified that the Addl. P.P. has only

forwarded the application moved by the complaint.”




F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of an application filed by Shri Subhash H.No.85/279, Lady Harding Staff Quarters, Panchkuin Road, New Delhi under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the letter may be gone through and information in this matter may be forwarded within five days from the receipt of this letter to the undersigned for onward submission to the applicant.



The Reader to DOP, Directorate of Prosecution


F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 04.09.2012, in the office of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on the various points as per record is as under:-

4. No such information on this point is available with this office and all the process for recruitment is taken up with the concerned agency by the Home Department of Govt. of NCT of Delhi being the Cadre Controlling Authority.

5. As such no information on this point is available with this office.

6. The ACRs beyond the period 16.02.2001 to till date is not available in this

office and may be with Home Department. The officer may approach the concerned department for copies of ACRs for the period in question if desired so.

(B.S.KAIN)



The Chief Prosecutor, North, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 16.11.2012,filed in the name of P.I.O. C.S. office and received in the office on 23.11.2012 in the name of Public Information Officer, of this office, on the subject cited above, the information on copies of complaints against B.S.Joon, Director of Prosecution sought by you is as under:- The information sought by you cannot be disclosed under section 8 (h) of Right to Information Act-2005 as it would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders.



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Naresh Kumar Verma, 302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-110049. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 25.09.2012, in the office of Public Information Officer, Chief Secretary’s office, on the subject cited above received in this office on 28.09.2012, the information on the various points as per record is as under:-

26. No service book is maintained for employees appointed on ad-hoc basis.

The service book of the officer available with the department is w.e.f. 16.02.2001.

27. The proposal for granting of MACP is being considered. 28. The order for re-fixation of pay in respect of officer has been issued by

the department as the same was applicable. 29. The information sought is a privileged communication in between

employer and employee and not in the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005.

30. The information sought is a privileged communication in between employer and employee and not in the ambit of Right to Information Act-2005.

31. The complaint against an officer is a confidential document and cannot be disclosed in public interest.

32. The information sought by the applicant is voluminous in nature and the officer is advised to inspect the files/service record of the concerned officer and indicate the copies of relevant record/documents which are required by the officer and the same will be made available.

33. Shri Sanjay Soni, Addl. P.P. has been designated as Head of office vide order No. F.4(43)DOP/Acctts/Vol.I/2004/2765-70, dated 01.10.2010 and Shri S.C.Sharma Chief Prosecutor (Central) has been designated as Vigilance Officer of the department with the approval of Cadre Controlling Authority.

34. Proceeding on LTC & earned leave are personal matters and being third party information the same cannot be disclosed. The training is official matter and the officers had gone on training in official capacity.

35. The Memos issued to the officer are privileged communication in between employer and the employee and are not in the ambit of cannot be disclosed.

36. The information sought by the applicant is voluminous in nature and the applicant is advised to inspect the relevant files and indicate the copies of relevant record/documents which are required so that same can be made available.

37. One Ambassador Car is provided as official vehicle to Director of Prosecution.

38. The vehicle is parked at the residence of the officer to avoid dead mileage.

39. The questions information sought by the applicant is personal in nature and is not in the ambit of Right to Information act.

40. Complaints filed against the officers are a confidential in nature and cannot be disclosed as the same are a privileged communication and not in the ambit of Right to Information Act.

41. No such copy of petition and replies filed by the department are available I n this office and transfer of any officer is prerogative of the cadre controlling authority.

42. No transfer policy is in existence in this office however transfer/posting is being made as per functional requirement of an office.

43. D.P.W.A. is an elective body and this office is not having any control and as such no information is available with this office.

44. As at point 18 above 45. The information sought is confidential one and not a public document

and hence cannot be disclosed in public interest. 46. Head of office is an administrative post and the officer holding the post is

also assigned court work. 47. There are no restrictions for deputing Addl. P.P. / Chief Prosecutors for

Court work. The officers are deputed as per functional requirement in smooth functioning of official work. The Post of Director/Chief Prosecutor is a supervisory post.

48. It is not administratively feasible as there is shortage of Prosecuting officers and it is essential to depute an officer in case of leave by the regular Prosecuting officer in a particular court.

49. No such proposal is under consideration in administrative department.



1st

Appellate Authority under Right to information Act-2005.

Chief Prosecutor (North,) Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of 8Delhi, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.

50. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION: DELHI GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI

F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Rajiv Bharti, H.No.320, Hastasaal Gaon, Uttam Nagar, Delhi-110059. Sub: Furnishing of information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 01.10.2012, filed in the office of

undersigned under Right to Information the point wise information has been obtained from the concerned office and as per record the same is as under: 4. The Special Report and JD was received in this office on 09.06.2012 and was

examined by the concerned functionary and was found fit for appeal and same was sent to L& J Department through Ld. DOP.

5. It cannot be disclosed as per provisions of RTI Act being a third party matter. The same can be supplied when first party furnishes request in writing.

6. The same cannot be disclosed.







19. As per record of Ld. Chief Prosecutor (West) Shri A.B.Asthana APP has scrutinized the Charge sheet and Shri Om Prakash, Chief Prosecutor west forwarded the trial to concerned. The telephone No. of CP West is 23924808.

20. Ms. Sweta Shahi, APP appeared for state on 18.10.2010, Ms.Sheetan Choudhary APP on 11.03.2011, Shri Brij Pal appeared for state on 13.07.2011 in the respective court.Ms. Subhra Goel, APP appeared in the Court for state on 20.12.2011. 22.05.2012 and 29.08.2012.

21. This information is not on record. 22. Since the submission of the charge sheet, total six dates have been given

by the Hon’ble Court. Names of the Concerned Ld. APP may be sought from the office of Ld. Chief P.P (West).






Prosecutor is obliged to assist the Court, if required.

32. Directorate of Prosecution is having branch offices in all the District Courts located at Tis Hazari, Rohini, Saket, Karkardooma, Patiala House, and Dwarka Courts. The Prosecution defends the part of state only in the respective court.

(B.S.Kain)



1st





11. Charge sheet was filed in the Court on 03.07.2010 in the presence of Ld. APP.


13. As at point 2 above. 14. Shri Pankaj Bhatia, APP appeared on behalf of state 07 times from

03.07.2010 to 06.03.2012 and on last two dates i.e. 25.09.2012 & 26.04.2012, Shri B.B.Bhasin, had appeared on behalf of State. The telephone No. of Ld.CP West is 23924808.


16. On 03.07.2010 to 25.09.2012, the case has been adjourned for nine times.Shri Pankaj Bhatia, APP appeared on state 07 times from 03.07.2010 to 06.03.2012.

17. Ct.Tejpal, HC Heera Lal and Smt. Babita have been examined as Prosecution witness and next date of hearing in this case is 19.02.2013.

18. Arguments on charge were heard addressed on 30.09.2010. 19. Charge u/s 324 IPC has been framed against accused. 20. The information on this point has already been provided at point

No.4. M

(B.S.Kain)



1st





F.No. ID No. /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: 55 Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by Shri G.D.Parashar, C-114, 1st

Floor, Fateh Nagar, New Delhi seeking information under Right to Information Act-2005.


(B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, To, Reader to C.P. West, Direcatorate of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts, along-with copy of the application.



F.No. ID No.1715/RTI-5/DOP/2013/ Dated: Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by Shri Hukam Singh, s/o Late Shri Prem Chand, Village Gokulpur, Delhi-110094 received from Public Information Officer cum Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, North East District, Delhi for seeking information under Right to Information Act-2005. The contents of the application may be looked into and the information sought by the applicant on point No.1, 3 & 5 as per available record may be furnished to the undersigned within five days from the receipt of this communication for onward submission to the applicant.

a . (B.S.Kain) Public Information Officer, Addl. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, To, Reader to C.P./In-Charge, Distt. North East, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi.



F.No. ID No. /RTI-05/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, North District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Ajay Kumar s/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o 32-33, Kucha Chaudhary, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of Shri Ajay Kumar s/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o 32-33, Kucha Chaudhary, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005 from the office of PIO, Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, North District, Delhi for providing the information under Right to Information Act-2005.

11. On going through the contents of application, it has been observed that the information sought in the letter the applicant does not pertain to this department.



(B.S.Kain)


4. Shri Ajay Kumar s/o Shri Rameshwar Singh, R/o 32-33, Kucha Chaudhary, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006, under Right to Information Act-2005 with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.








First Appellate Authority under Right to Information Act-2005.







Appellate








Chief Prosecutor (North/Anti Corruption) Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054.








Point No. 1 to 4.




1st






Sir,






respective Courts.

Yours faithfully,








provided as under:-


















F.No. /RTI-05/2012 Dated: To, Shri Kishan Rai, T-185, Huts C.A. Block, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088. Sub: Furnishing of Information under Right to Information Act-2005.

With reference to your application filed in the office of CPIO, o/o Addl.

Registrar, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi and received in this office from PIO

o/o Chief Secretary, Delhi, on 25.10.2012 in the o/o undersigned the information as

per record on point No.3 and 8 in respect of this department is as under:-

Point No.3.

No penalty has been imposed against any officer/official of this department

under Right to Information Act-2005 till date.

Point No.8.

The Public Information officer and 1st

(i). Shri B.S.Kain, Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution,

Appellate Authority of the

department are as under:

Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi T.No. 23986952.

(ii). Shri R.S.Yadav, Chief Prosecutor, North, Directorate of Prosecution,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi T.No.23934808

(B.S.Kain)













(B.S.Kain)








(B.S.Kain)



Copy to:-




(B.S.Kain)












(B.S.Kain)





F.No. ID No. /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, O/o Pr. Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi Delhi Secretariat, I.P.Estate, New Delhi-110002. Sub: Transfer of application received from Shri Rajiv Vaid, s/o Shri H.P.Vaid, 246, Sunhari Bagh Apartment, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi-110085 under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The undersigned has received an application of Shri Rajiv Vaid, s/o Shri H.P.Vaid, 246, Sunhari Bagh Apartment, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi-110085 regarding for providing of information under the Right to Information Act, 2005.





(B.S.Kain)






















Encl. aas above.



F.No. ID No.1 (144)/DOP/2012/ Dated: To, Smt. Usha Mann, R/o 13-B, Super Deluxe Flats, Sector-15, NOIDA,U.P. Sub: Providing of photocopies of files for the record dealing with the matters of Smt. Usha Mann, Ex. Chief Prosecutor. In continuation of this office letter of even number dated 24.05.2013, on the subject cited above, and in response to your letter dated ----------- please find enclosed herewith photocopies of the relevant record as inspected by you on 21.05.2013 in pursuance of decisions dated 15.04.2013 of Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, in an appeal bearing No.CIC/AD/C/2011/001455 and telephonic discussions held on 23.05.2013. The details of photocopy of the relevant files are as under:- S.No. File No. Correspondence

side

Noting side

1. 1(144)/DOP/07/Vol.II 13/C 6/N

2. 1(144)/DOP/2007/Vol.III 6/C --

3. 1(144)/DOP/PF/Vol.IV 26/C 6/N

4. 1(144)/DOP/2012/ 57/C 11/N

5. 1(144)DOP/2012-13 222/C 21/N

6. 1(144)/DOP/2012 Extracts of correspondence specified containing 11 pages.

--

7. 2(337)/DOP/2007-08 6 pages 44/N & 45/CN

inadvertently

marked as C

8. F.Misc./DOP/2012/Acctts. 10 pages 4/N

9. F. Misc.Acctt./DOP/ 65 pages 14/N

(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor,

Encl. As above.

With reference to your application

10dated 14.03.2011 filed to Public Information Officer, on the subject cited above

under Right to Information Act-2005 the information on the relevant points

pertaining to this department has been called from the concerned authorities. The

point wise reply is as under:-

15. The information













House Courts.










New Delhi.




23. As above.















2005.


























(B.S.Kain)



RTI MATTER

MOST URGENT

















F.No. ID No. /RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, Shri Rajeev Bharti, H.No.320, 320, Hastsal Gaon, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi . Sub; - Filing of 1st




your appeal will be heard on 03.05.2011at 3.00 p.m. in the chamber of Chief

Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.


on the scheduled date and time.










Yours faithfully,

(B.S.Kain)









(B.S.Kain)




GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI F.No. ID No698/RTI-5/DOP/2012 Dated: To, Shri Avdesh Mittal, E-94, Greater Kailash, Part-I, New Delhi. Sub: - Information sought under Right to Information Act-2005.





(B.S.Kain)




GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI F.No. ID No.508/RTI-5/DOP/09/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, o/o Distt. & Session Judge, Distt. North, Tis Hazari, Delhi-110054. SUB: - Transfer of application in respect of Shri Ranjeet Singh Minhas, Sahkarita Bhawan, 31 to 34, Sector 2, Panchkula, under section 6 (3) of Right to Information Act-2005. Sir, Please find enclosed herewith a copy of application filed by Shri Ranjeet Singh Minhas, Sahkarita Bhawan, 31 to 34, Sector 2, Panchkula, filing in the office of Ms.Sindhu Pillai, Dy. Commissioner of Police cum PIO, North District, Civil Lines and received in the office of undersigned on 14.12.2013, on the subject cited above.

4. The contents of the application have been gone through and it is found that the information sought by the applicant does not relates to this office.

5. It is observed that information sought in the application is closely related to your office. The copy of the application is being transferred under section 6(3) of Right to Information Act-2005 to you with the request that the information may directly be furnished to the applicant under intimation to the undersigned.


Yours faithfully,


Addl. Public Prosecutor. Encl. as above. Copy for information to Shri Ranjeet Singh Minhas, Sahkarita Bhawan, 31 to 34, Sector 2, Panchkula, with the request to approach the concerned PIO for further correspondence.




Yours faithfully,





F.No. ID No. /RTI-2005/DOP/ Dated: To, Shri Yogesh Kumar, c/o Pratidhi, Room No.41, 2nd

Shakarpur Police StationComplex, floor,

Pushta Road, Ramesh Park, Delhi-110092. Sub: Furnishing information under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 23.10.2012 filed in the office undersigned, received on 26.10.2012 on the subject cited above, it is to inform you that the information sought by you has been collected from the concerned office and as per record the same is as under:-

To The Station House Officer Police Station Kashmere Gate Delhi Sub:

Information regarding missing of my purse containing Rs.1750/- and passport No. E 7060830 issued on 31/07/2003

Sir,

It is submitted that I was coming from my house as I had to go to Tis

Hazari Courts to meet my lawyer for some personal work. Today in the

evening at about 4.00 p.m., when I alighted near local bus stand, Kashmere

Gate. Delhi There was rush in the bus and on the road and when I reached

near Metro Station gate, I found my purse, containing Rs.1750/ - and my

passport, kept in my laptop bag was missing. I tried to search the same but

it was not found. I believe that my purse got misplaced when I was

deboarding from bus near local bus stand.

It is submitted that my report may kindly be registered.

Applicant

(Pinky) D/o late Sh. Baldev Raj Juneja

R/o G-50, Ground Floor, Vikas Puri, New Delhi -18.




To,

Shri Anil Dutt Sharma,

D-129, New Seelampur,

Delhi.


With reference to your application received in the office of

CPIO, 8th

Level, Delhi Sectt. And transferred to this office, the

relevant information has been called for from the concerned

authorities in respective district courts as per available records the

same is as under;-

Saket Court Complex:-

834 cases u/s 376 IPC and 783 cases u/s 498 IPC.

146 conviction and 322 acquittal u/s 376 IPC and 01 conviction & Nil

acquittal u/s 498-IPC.

01 case u/s 376 IPC.

67 cases were disposed u/s 376 IPC.

29 conviction & 38 acquittal u/s 376 IPC.

243 cases are pending prior to special courts designated u/s 376 IPC

258 cases of rape currently in special designated court of Delhi.

Tis Hazari Courts:

Rape cases from 2003 to Dec.2012 -306

Conviction 68 and acquittal 193

It cannot be determined whether complaint is false.

09 cases were decided by the Fast Tract Court wherein 09 were

convicted and 43 were acquitted w.e.f January-2013.

As above.

162 cases are pending in 02 designated Courts at Tis Hazari, Delhi.

Rohini Court Complex:

Total cases u/s 498 of IPC from the year 2003 to till date:

2006= 590 cases,

2007= 611 cases,

2008= 442 cases,

2009= 196 cases,

2010= 287 cases,

2011= 398 cases,

in

The documents sought by you are the part of the judicial file.

You are accordingly advised to apply for providing of certified copies

from the Copy Branch of Distt. & Session Courts.

Photocopies of charge-sheet, list of witnesses, statement of

witnesses u/s 161 of Cr.P.C. Ballistic report and P.M. report as

available in record can be made available and contains 50 pages. If you

require the copies of the same, you are advised to deposit an amount of

Rs.100/- (Rs.2/- per page) with the AAO/DDO of the department as per

provisions of Right to Information Act-2005.

(B.S.KAIN)



..




F.No. ID No.3660 /RTI-05/DOP/ Dated:

To,


Jail No.4,

Tihar Prison,

Jail Road,

New Delhi-110054.



Public Information Officer of this department on the subject cited

above, the information has been called for from the concerned

functionaries and as per available in record of this department, the

requisite information on point No.1, 2 & 3 sought by you is as

under:-

1. The order in question is part and partial file of judicial record.

The applicant is advised to apply for copy of the order to the

appropriate Court/Copying Branch.

2. As per record no action has been taken against the officer

concerned in the matter referred regarding point No. 2 & 3 of

the application.

(BALBIR SINGH)


ASSTT. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

1ST


Chief Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Distt. North,

Room No.174, Tis Hazari Courts Complex, Delhi-110054.



F.No. ID No.3949/RTI-05/DOP/2013/ Dated: To, The Public Information Officer, West District, O/o Distt. & Session Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054. Sub: Transfer of application of Shri Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar/Subzi Mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 under Right to Information Act-2005. The undersigned has received an application of application of Shri Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar/Subzi Mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 under Right to Information Act-2005.




(Balbir Singh)

Public Information Officer, Asstt. Public Prosecutor Directorate of Prosecution, Encl. as above. Copy for information to:- Shri Harish Kumar Sahni, WZ-225-A, Shani Bazar/Subzi Mandi Road, Near Kamal Public School, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 with the request to approach the concerned Public Authority for future correspondence.





F.No. ID No.3660 /RTI-05/DOP/ Dated:

To,


Jail No.4,

Tihar Prison,

Jail Road,

New Delhi-110054.



Public Information Officer Police Head Quarter and transferred to

this department by Home Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, the

requisite information on points sought by you is as under:-

1. The appointment of Shri Rajiv Mohan, as Special Public

Prosecutor is made as per provisions of sub section (8) of

section 24 of Cr.P.C.1973 vide Notification

No.8/119/2006/HP-II/7325, dated 25.10.2006 of Deputy

Secretary (Home), Govt. of NCT of Delhi. For obtaining the

copy of Notification you may approach to the Home

Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi.

2. The information sought by you is personal information and the

same cannot be made available as the officer has requested

not to disclose his personal information.

(BALBIR SINGH)



1ST








To,

Shri Ramesh Upadhyay,

Central Prison,

Navi Mumbai-410210.



Public Information Officer Ministry of Law & Judiciary, Govt. of India,

and received in the office of under signed from APIO, Police Head

Quarter, New Delhi on the subject cited above. The Inforamtion

sought by you on point No.1 & 2 is as under:-

1. The appointment of Special Public Prosecutor is made as per

Provisions of sub section-8 of section 24 of Cr.P.C.1973.

2. It is to inform you that the information sought by you is

multifarious in nature and not specific. You are therefore

requested to approach the CPIO of the concerned office

specifying the particular information mentioning the Case FIR

No. name of Police Station etc. so that the same could be

furnished to you.

(BALBIR SINGH)



1ST








To,

Shri Vivek Garg,

Advocate,

18/1, Shakti Nagar,

Delhi-110007.



Public Information Officer, O/o Lt. Governor of Delhi and received in

the office of under signed from APIO, Police Head Quarter, New

Delhi on transfer on the subject cited above. It is to inform you that

on going through the contents of application, for the information

sought by you it is observed that none of the point of information is

related to this department.

(BALBIR SINGH)



1ST








To,

Shri B.Soni,

Zee Media Corporation Ltd.

(Formerly known as Zee News Ltd.)

FC-19, Sector 16-A,

Noida-201301, U.P.



Public Information Officer, of this Department on the subject cited

above, the information sought by you point No.1 & 2 is as under:-

1. Whatever files/matter is received from the Investigating

Agency, in the Prosecution Branch, during investigation, the

same are returned to the Investigating agency in original and

no copy of the same is retained by this department.

2. No approval of Director of Prosecution is necessary for filing

of Charge sheet and it is the prerogative of Investigation

Agency.

(BALBIR SINGH)



1ST








To,

Shri Kaushik Dey,

Advocate,

B-10, Sagar Apartment,

6 Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110001.



Public Information Officer, of this Department on the subject cited

above, the information sought by you point No.1,2 & 3 as per

available record of this office is as under:-

1. No information has been sought.

2. & 3.Acquittal report in case FIR No.433/1991, PS R.K.Puram,

was sent to Pr. Secretary (Law & Judicial) vide

Dy.No.3013/DOP,dated 18.10.2012. File was received back

with the recommendation for filing of appeal and the same was

sent to Dy. Commissioner of Police, South Distt.vide

Dy.No.4429/DOP, dated 19.11.2012.

3. The information on point No.4, 5, 6 & 7 pertains to Police

Department. Your application for furnishing on these points is

being transferred to the concerned PIO/Police Authorities of

the respective Distt. under per provisions of RTI Act-2005.

(BALBIR SINGH)



1ST




Copy to:-

The PIO/Addl. Commissioner of Police, Distt. South along-with copy

of the application of the applicant with the request to furnish the

information on the relevant points.





Shri Manoj Kumar, C/o Shri Naveen Kumar Bhatti, Chamber No. E-

319, E-Block, 3rd

Floor, Karkardooma Courts Shahdara Delhi-

110032, under Right to Information Act-2005 received in the office

of Public Information Officer. The information sought by the

applicant pertains to your office.





(Balbir Singh)









Shri Subash Chand Gupta, S/ Shri Dharam Pal Gupta, r/o B-1, Gali

No.2, Mandawali, Unchepur, Delhi-110092, under Right to

Information Act-2005 received in the office of Public Information

Officer. The information sought by the applicant pertains to your

office.





(Balbir Singh)









Shri Iqbal Ashraf Rahmani, Advocate, 51, Kishan Kunj, Flat No.304,

Rose Apartment, ner Anarwali Masjid, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092,

under Right to Information Act-2005 received in the office of Public

Information Officer. The information sought by the applicant pertains

to your office.





(Balbir Singh)









Shri S.K.Pandey, Advocate, Chamber No.735-C, Criminal Side,

Western Wing, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi-110054, under Right to

Information Act-2005 received in the office of Public Information

Officer. The information sought by the applicant pertains to your

office.





(Balbir Singh)





OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI - 54

F.No. ID No.702 /RTI-05/DOP/2010/ Dated:

To, Sh. K.Sharma, M/s Sun Air Hotel, The Metropolitan Hotel, Bangla Sahib Marg, New Delhi-110001. Sub: - Information sought under Right to Information Act-2005. In continuation of the orders of the 1st

1. The role of the Screening Committee is totally different. Ld. A.P.P. takes

steps as per section 321 of Cr.P.C.

Appellate Authority, the revised

information on point no. 1 & 4 is as under:-

(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer/ Addl. Public Prosecutor,


OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION

GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI - 54

F.No. ID No. 462/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated:

To, Sh. Naresh Kumar Verma,

S/o Shri Ram Kumar Verma, H.No.302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi.

Sub: - Information sought under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 15.02.2012 to the undersigned under Right to Information Act-2005, the point wise information sought by you is as under:- S.No. Information sought Information furnished

1. Please let me know whether past service as Company Secretary in Govt. of India w.e.f. 27.01.2000 to 14.01.2001 has been added in respect of service of the officer or not. If not reasons for the same.

As per service record, the past service has not been added and service rendered as Company Secretary cannot be treated at par of APP.

2. Also let me know whether past ad-hoc service w.e.f. 06.06.1995 to 09.08.99 as APP in GNCTD has been added to service of officer, if not why. + desirable qualification as provided in RRs + sufficient for purpose of qualifying service for retirement purposes

As per Service Record available no record of ad-hoc service for the period is available in the department. However ad-hoc service rendered cannot be counted as qualifying unless the same is treated as regular service for all purposes.

3. Also let me know whether benefit of MACP has been granted to the officer or not. If not reasons for delay if any.

Not yet granted. The same is under consideration.

(B. S. KAIN)

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION

1st Appellate Authority-

Chief Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 174, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi – 110054

RTI MATTER

OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY / DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI; TIS HAZARI COURTS; DELHI -54

No. 32/Appeal/DOP/2010 Date To,

Sh. Masood Ahmad, C-1/50, Yamuna Vihar, DELHI – 110053.

SUB:- Appeal under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Sir,

I am in receipt of your Appeal on 04.08.2010. In this connection, you are

advised to appear in person before the undersigned at 03:00 P.M. on 12.08.2010

,

to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this

regard.

Yours faithfully

(B. S. JOON) APPELLATE AUTHORITY /

DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION DELHI


F.No. ID No. 448-A/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To,

The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I / Public Information Officer,

North East District, Office location: Seelampur DELHI.

SUB:-

Transfer of Application of Sh. Jwala Prasad under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3435/DOP dated 09.07.2010 in respect of Sh. Jwala Prasad under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information (Copy enclosed). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.

(B. S. KAIN)


Copy to: Sh. Jwala Prasad F – 66, New Usmanpur, Delhi - 53, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.


F.No. ID No. 446/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To,

Sh. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate, Central Hall, Patiala House Courts, NEW DELHI .

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 446 of Sh. Rajesh Gupta.

Sir,

Please find enclosed herewith the reply of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 446 dated 01.07.2010 is as under:-

1. Lokesh Kumar, ACMM, KKD and Ankur Jain, MM KKD Court. 2. Kaveri Baweja CMM, Manish Yaduvanshi, MM Tis Hazari, Sidharth

Mathur, MM Tis Hazari. 3. Yes 4. 10 AM to 5 PM. 5. He has not availed any Earned Leave and Medical Leave. 6. Yes. 7. Residing with each other in Govt. Accommodation allotted to Kiran

Bansal. 8. Kiran Bansal. 9. Question is vague and out of preview of RTI. Information under RTI can

be given only to a record maintained in office. Applicant is asked to disclose where such record in kept. Even otherwise he never takes any advantage for the same.

10. He always files his return. 11. He filed the same with income tax office and same may be asked from

the income tax office. 12. He has one working account in SBI. 13. It is personal question and can not ask under RTI. Even otherwise he

never purchased any thing from that area. 14. It is personal question and can not ask under RTI. Even otherwise he can

not give the phone number of all of my relatives to a person who wasted his time in such a mischievous application.

15. No. 16. He only visited his relative during this period without expenses. Details

of the same are personal.

-2-

17. Regarding performance of as APP, a report from Chief Prosecutor / Central Distt. Court Complex, Tis Hazari, Delhi is attached herewith.

18. Since 2003. One of such Judge resides there. 19. There is no vehicle in his name. They have one car and motorcycle in

name is his wife. Same were purchased after taking loan from SBI and SBBJ.

20. It is personal question and can not ask under RTI. Even otherwise it is not concerned with official duty.

Yours faithfully,

(B. S. KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER

DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Director Appellate Authority-

Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024



To, Smt. Jaya Kakkar,

H. No. B – 2575, Gali No. 66, Sant Nagar, Burari, DELHI – 110084.

SUB:- Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no.

447 of Smt. Jaya Kakkar. Sir,

In reference to your RTI application dated 02.07.2010 received in this

Directorate vide ID No. 447, please find enclosed herewith the reply collected from

the Chief Prosecutor, South District, Patiala House Courts, Directorate of

Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, contained 01 (One) page and this disposes off

the application submitted by you.


DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION DELHI








450 of Smt. Jaya Kakkar. Sir, With reference to your RTI application transferred from the office of the

Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, South District, New Delhi received in this

office on dated 07.07.2010. In this context, it is submitted that the legal opinion is

already sent to the applicant vide no. F.No. I.D. No. 439/RTI/DOP/2010/412-413

dated 09.06.2010.

However, in view of your RTI application, the legal opinion is once again

forwarded to you and this disposes off the application submitted by you.







Sh. Masood Ahmad, C – 1 / 50, Yamuna Vihar, DELHI - 110053

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 445 of Sh. Masood Ahmad.

Sir,



the Public Prosecutor, Delhi and Administration Branch, Directorate of Prosecution,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi, contained 02 (Two) pages and this disposes off the

application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. V. D. Narang, B-1/2-3, Zamrudpur, NEW DELHI – 110048.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 443 of Sh. V. D. Narang.

Sir,

Please find the copy of the reply received from the Standing Counsel, Crl.,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi, in respect of your RTI application vide ID No. 443 received

in this office on dated 15.06.2010.

Yours faithfully,

(B. S. KAIN)


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI



The Sr. Manager (P&SO) / Public Information Officer, Delhi Transport Cooperation, BBM Complex, NEW DELHI - 9.

SUB:- Transfer of Application of Sh. Hari Kishan Nijhawan under the Right to

Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3491/DOP dated 13.07.2010 in respect of Sh. Hari Kishan Nijhawan under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information (Copy enclosed). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls: As above.

(B. S. KAIN)


DELHI Copy to: Sh. Hari Kishan Nijhawan, Hon’y General Secretary, Paardarshita Public Welfare foundation, B 6 / 69-A, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi - 110029, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.





Central District, Near P.S., Dariyaganj, DELHI.

SUB:- Transfer of Application of Sh. Vivek Sawhney under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3379/DOP dated 06.07.2010 in respect of Sh. Vivek Sawhney under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information (Copy enclosed). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.

(B. S. KAIN)


Copy to: Sh. Vivek Sawhney, 24 – Kamla Market, New Delhi – 110002, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Sh. S. K. Dash, Addl.PP, Patiala House Courts, NEW DELHI .

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 444 of Sh. S. K. Dash, Addl.PP.

Sir,



the Accounts Branch, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, contained

02 (Two) pages and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above



Appellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024




SUB: Application for supply of information under RTI Act’2005. Sir,

This has reference to your application dated 30.06.2010, received in this

Directorate vide diary no. 3267/DOP dated 03.07.2010, seeking information

regarding Sh. Praveen Bansal, APP.

In this connection, it is inform you that kindly send the Indian Postal Order

(as RTI fees) in favour of Director of Prosecution or Public Information Officer,

Directorate of Prosecution, Delhi instead of Chief Prosecutor (South – East) District,

Patiala House Court earliest, so that information under RTI Act be supplied to you

within the stipulated period.

Yours faithfully,





To,

Sh. Jwala Prasad, F – 66, New Usmanpur, DELHI - 110053.


This has reference to your application dated 03/07/2010, received in this

Directorate vide diary no. 3345/DOP dated 03.07.2010, seeking copy of complete

police file pertaining to case FIR No. 225/07.

In this connection, it is inform you that kindly disclosed the full particulars

of the case i.e. F.I.R. No., under section, name of the case and name of the Police

Station.

You are therefore, requested to disclose the name of the Police Station

earliest, so that information under RTI Act be supplied to you within the stipulated

period.

Yours faithfully,


DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION

GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI - 54 F.No. ID No. 448/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To,






In this connection, it is to inform you that Directorate of Prosecution is not

the custodian of police file or any other document pertaining to the Criminal case.

Hence, it is advisable, that you may approach to the competent police authorities for

the said documents, sought vide your above-mentioned RTI Application.

Further, it should also be ensured before applying for the said documents

with the competent police authorities that complete details of the case i.e. police

station etc. should be mentioned in the application.

This dispose of your application dated 03/07/2010

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above

(PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION




The Standing Counsel, GOVT. OF N.C.T. of Delhi, High Court of Delhi, NEW DELHI.

SUB: Transfer of Application of Sh. V. D. Narang under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3146/DOP dated 15.06.2010 in respect of Sh. V. D. Narang under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully, Encls: As above.



Copy for information:- Sh. V. D. Narang, B – 1 / 2-3, Zamrudpur, New Delhi – 110048, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

RTI MATTER MOST IMMIDIATE


GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI: TIS HAZARI COURTS: DELHI - 54 F.No. ID No. 446/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated:

MEMORANDUM

With reference to the RTI application (attached with this memo) vide I.D

No. 446 moved by Sh. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate, Central Hall, Patiala House

Courts, New Delhi which is relating to you. It’s necessary to call upon you

to file the reply / written submission within 03 days, so that the information

can be supplied to the applicant within stipulated time.

Further you are directed to send your comments / reply by 06.07.2010

positively.

(B. S. KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATIOIN OFFICER




The Deputy Secretary (Home) / PIO, GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Department, 5th

I. P. Estate, New Delhi. Level, C Wing, Delhi Secretariat,

SUB: Transfer of Application of Sh. Masood Ahmad, Addl.PP under the Right

to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3285/DOP dated 01.07.2010 in respect of Sh. Masood Ahmad, Addl.PP under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information i.e. Q. No. 3 & 4 pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,




Copy for information:- Sh. Masood Ahmad, C – 1 / 50, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi - 110053, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.


F.No. I.D.445/RTI/DOP/2010 Dated: Kindly find enclosed herewith RTI application vide ID No.

445/RTI/DOP/2010 filed by Sh. Masood Ahmad, C – 1 / 50, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi -

110053. In application the point No. 1, 5, 6 & 7 is related to Administration Branch.

The requisite information may kindly be provided by today.



PP / Delhi, Dte. Of Prosecution Delhi.






(B. S. KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATION

OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION

DELHI HEAD CLERK / Grade II (DASS) DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION





Sir,


4. Kindly contact the Standing Counsel, High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. 5-10 Kindly contact the Standing Counsel, High court of Delhi at New Delhi. 11-12 The Department of Law & Justice and Legislative Affairs, GNCTD has approved

the case and observed it is a fit case for filing the appeal. Further reply for reasons for not filing the appeal may be asked from the Standing Counsel, High Court of Delhi, New Delhi.

13. No penalty has been imposed on PIO. 14. Appellate Authority / Director, Dte. Of Prosecution, GNCT of Delhi, R. No. 159,

Tis Hazari Court, Delhi-54. 15. We have no records to this facts and same may be asked from the Office of the

Standing Counsel, High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. 16. It is a matter of record and needs no reply. 17-20 Kindly contact the Standing Counsel, High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. 21. Needs no reply.

And this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

(B. S. KAIN)


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Appellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024



The Assistant Public Information Officer (Traffic), Office of the Dy. Commissioner of Police: Traffic (HQ), 1st

R. K. Puram, Floor, PS R. K. Puram, Sector – 12,

NEW DELHI. SUB:- Transfer of Application of Ms. Hema D’Souza under the Right to


Sir, Please refer to your office letter no. F.363/RTI/ACT/10/2267/RTI Cell/Tr. dated 01.06.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 3030/DOP dated 08.06.2010 in respect of Ms. Hema D’Souza under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, it is submitted that the requisite information does not pertain to this Directorate as intimated by DOP branch. Therefore, the same is return back / transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls: As above.

(B. S. KAIN)


DELHI Copy to: Ms. Hema D’Souza, 82, Sector 2, Pocket 1, Ph. 1, New Delhi - 75, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Sh. Rajiv Garg, A – 240, Sudershan Park NEW DELHI - 110015

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 437 of Sh. Rajiv Garg.

Sir,



the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge (West), Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of

Delhi, contained 01 (One) page and this disposes off the application submitted by

you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






To, The Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, Room No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 SUB:- An application under Right to Information Act, 2005 in r/o. Ms. Jaya

Kakkar. Sir, With reference to your order no. case No. CIC/WB/A/2009/000147 dated

07.05.2010 on the subject cited above. In this context, it is submitted that the reply

of the application is already sent to the applicant vide no. F.No. I.D. No.

431/RTI/DOP/2010/403-404 dated 05.06.2010

However, in view of your order the reply of the said RTI application is

once again forwarded to the applicant as well as to office of your goodself.



Copy to- Smt. Jaya Kakkar, H. No. B – 2575, Gali No. 66, Sant Nagar, Burari, DELHI – 110084.



Sh. Jitender Kaur, 7091 / 10, Mata Rameshwari, Nehru Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 435 of Sh. Jitender Kaur.

Sir,



the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge (Central), Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT

of Delhi, contained 01 (One) page and this disposes off the application submitted by

you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





F.No. I.D. No. 434/RTI/DOP/10/ Dated:

Kindly find enclosed herewith RTI application vide I.D. No.

434/RTI/DOP/2010 filed by Sh. V. D. Narang, B–1/2 – 3, Zamrudpur, New Delhi –

110048 as the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge (Central) has requested that the requisite

information may be obtained from the office of Ld. PP/Delhi as the case has already

been decided by the trial Court i.e. CMM Court.

The requisite information may kindly be provided within two days.



Public Prosecutor / Delhi.



The Central Public Information Officer-cum-Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police-I,

Office of the Central Public Information Officer-cum-Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police – I, West District, Ist Floor P.S. Rajouri Garden, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Ms. Anubha Rastogi under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please refer to the letter no. 5485/(848/10/DIC/(DA-II)/West dated 26.05.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 2953/DOP dated 02.06.2010 in respect of Ms. Anubha Rastogi under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, the required information pertains to your office. Therefore, the same is transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.

(B. S. KAIN) LINK PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER


Copy to: Ms. Anubha Rastogi, B-68, IInd Floor, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Smt. Radhika Nandrajog, TG – 2C / 14, Garden Estate, Gurgaon, HARYANA - 122002.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 432 of Smt. Radhika Nandrajog.

Sir,



the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge, Patiala House Court, Directorate of Prosecution,



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above



Copy to:- Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police / PIO, Office of the Public Information Officer-Cum-Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, South Distt., Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016. Appellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024



Smt. Jaya Kakkar, H. No. B – 2575, Gali No. 66, Sant Nagar, Burari, DELHI – 110084.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 431 of Smt. Jaya Kakkar.

Sir,




Govt. of NCT of Delhi, contained 12 (Twelve) pages and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Lalit Kumar, Flat No. 109/A-1, Himalaya Apartment, Sector-2, Rohini, DELHI – 110085.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 424 of Lalit Kumar.

Sir,


1. NIL 2. The pay scale of Public Prosecutors are as under:-

S. No. Designation Pay Scale 1. Asstt. Public Prosecutor Rs. 9,300 – 34,800 (Grade Pay

Rs. 4,600/-) 2. Addl. Public Prosecutor Rs. 15,600 – 39,100 (Grade Pay

Rs. 5,400/-) 3. Chief Prosecutor Rs. 15,600 – 39,100 (Grade Pay

Rs. 6,600/-)

3. According to R R Rules of 2004. (photocopy enclosed) 4. The duties of Asstt. Public Prosecutor is to conduct cases on behalf of the State in the

Courts of Metropolitan Magistrate / ACMM /CMM, Delhi and also to render legal advice in the cases referred for the purpose and the duties of Addl. Public Prosecutor is to conduct cases in the Courts of Addl. Distt. & Session Judges, Delhi on behalf of Govt. of NCT of Delhi and also to render Legal Advise in the cases referred for the purpose.

5. No, the Asstt. Public Prosecutor and Public Prosecutors are not getting any Non-practicing Allowance (NPA)

6. No, there is no time scale promotion / grant of next higher scale after completion of specific period in the lower post.


Yours faithfully,

(B. S. KAIN)





The Deputy Secretary -II (H & FW) / PIO, Health and Family Welfare Department, Room No. 903, 9th

A - Wing, Delhi Secretariat, Level,

I. P. Estate, NEW DELHI. Sub. :Transfer of Application of Ms. Manju Aggarwal under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 2401/DOP dated 29.05.2010 in respect of Ms. Manju Aggarwal under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,




Copy for information:- Ms. Manju Aggarwal, Advocate, K – 16, Jangpura Ext., New Delhi – 110014, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.





SUB: Transfer of Application of Sh. K. K. Singh, Retd. Chief Prosecutor

under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 2320/DOP dated 21.05.2010 in respect of Sh. K. K. Singh, Retd. Chief Prosecutor under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,




Copy for information:- Sh. K. K. Singh, Retd. Chief Prosecutor, 66, Medha Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Ph. I, Delhi-110091, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



To, The Under Secretary & Dy. Registrar, Central Information Commission, Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Camus, New Delhi – 110067 SUB:- Complaint received under Section 18 of the RTI Act, 2005. Sir, With reference to your letter no. File No. CID/SG/C/2010/000676 dated 24.05.2010 on the subject cited above. In this connection it is submitted that the partly reply of the application under RTI Act has been dispatched vide no. 405/RTI/DOP/2010/356/546 dated 27.03.2010 and vide no. 424/RTI/DOP/2010/383/572 dated 05.05.2010 and some questions of the application under RTI Act have been transferred to the Deputy Secretary (Home) / PIO, Home Department vide letter no. 405/RTI/DOP/2010/339 dated 23.03.2010. But the envelopes containing the reply have been returned to the office by postal department with remarks that “No such person at this address”. However, in view of your order the reply of the said RTI application is once again forwarded to the applicant as well as to office of your goodself.



Copy to- Ms. Hansa Bhadana, 1794, Prasadi Gali, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi – 110003.



Sh. Rajiv Kumar A – 240, Sudershan Park New Delhi – 110 015.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 429 of Sh. Rajiv Kumar.

Sir,

In reference to your RTI application dated 21/05/2010 received in this


the Chief Prosecutor / West District of this Directorate contained 02 (Two) page and

this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





Sh. K. K. Singh Chief Prosecutor (Retd.) 66, Medha Apartments Mayur Vihar, Phase – I Delhi - 110091.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 428 of Sh. K. K. Singh.

Sir,



the Accounts Branch of this Directorate contained 01 (One) page and this disposes

off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Sir,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Sub. :Transfer of Application of Ms. Anjali Gupta under Right to


Sir, Please refer to the letter no. F.14/82/RTI/2010/HP-II/2999 dated 06.05.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 2104/DOP dated 10.05.2010 in respect of Ms. Anjali Gupta under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The some requisite information pertaining to your Office as intimated by the Chief Prosecutor, Rohini Courts (copy enclosed), may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Ms. Anjali Gupta, 43 – C, Sukhbir Nagar, Karala, Delh, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Sh. Rakesh Kumar , WZ – 13, Nimri Village, Shastri Nagar, DELHI

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right to Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 427 of Sh. Rakesh Kumar.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. F.14/77/RTI/2010/HP-II/2847 dated 29.04.2010,

please enclosed herewith the reply of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No.

427 dated 06.05.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Public

Prosecutor/Delhi, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this

disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





Sh. Manish Kumar S/o Sh. Kewal Krishan, C – 6 / 342, Badan Street, Near Gole Park, Dhuri – 148024 (Punjab).

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 423 of Sh. Manish Kumar S/o Sh. Kewal Krishan.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 2871/DIC/SWD dated 20.04.2010, please enclosed

herewith the reply of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 423 dated

24.04.2010 contained 02 (Two) pages collected from the concerned Chief

Prosecutor / Incharge, Dwarka Courts, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of

Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above

LINK PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy to:- Asstt. Public Information Officer, Office of the Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-cum-PIO, South West District, Sector 19, Dwarka, New Delhi. Appellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024



Smt. Neeraj C/o Stayavir, H. No. 8 / 17, Village and Post Office Mehram Nagar, Near Palam Airport, New Delhi- 110037.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 422 of Smt. Neeraj C/o Stayavir.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 14/80/RTI/2010/HP-II/2682 dated 22.04.2010,


422 dated 26.04.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the concerned Chief



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy to:- The Joint Secretary (Home), GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Deptt., 5th

Level, C Wing, Delhi Secretariat, I. P. Estate, New Delhi.




The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I / Public Information Officer, East District, Vishwas Nagar, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Omparakash N. Dube under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please refer to the letter no. I.D./690/4409/Info. Cell/East Distt. Dated 21.04.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 1920/DOP dated 27.04.2010 in respect of Sh. Omparakash N. Dube under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, the required information pertains to the Police Department as no dossier of any case is maintained by the Prosecution Branch. Moreover the case has already been decided. Therefore, the same is transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.



Copy to: Sh. Omparakash N. Dube, r/o. IInd Floor Nallasopara Shopping Center, Dube Estate, Nallasopara East, Taluka Vasai, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra-401209



Ms. Hansa Bhadana, 1794, Prasadi Gali, Kotla Mubarakpur, NEW DELHI – 110003.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 424 of Ms. Hansa Bhadana.

Sir,

Please enclosed herewith the partly reply i.e. question no. 1(e) of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 424 dated 23.03.2010 is as under:-

1(e) The remuneration / fee fixed of other Public Prosecutors are paid by the State Government. And this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above (B. S. KAIN)


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy to:- The SPIO/JOINT Secretary (Home), GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Department, 5th

level, C-wing, Delhi Secretariat, I. P. Estate, New Delhi for information.




Ms. Shagufta Parveen, D/o. Mohd. Israr, R/o-R-3A288, Mangal Bazar, Noori Masjid, Mohan Garden, Uttam Nagar, DELHI.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 420 of Ms. Shagufta Parveen.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 4002/(507/10/DIC/(DA-I)West dated 16.04.2010,



Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above



ppellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024



Sh. Dr. Jwala Prasad, F – 66, New Usmanpur, DELHI – 110053.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 421 of Dr. Jwala Prasad.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 50/RTI/PIO/2010/ID :0034 dated 23.04.2010,


421 dated 24.04.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the concerned Addl.

Public Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. R. N. Mishra, Advocate, RZ – 873, Street No. – 05, Sagarpur (Main), NEW DELHI – 110046.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 417 of Sh. R. N. Mishra.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 787/PIO/Crime & Railway dated 07.04.2010,


417 dated 13.04.2010 contained 10 (Ten) pages collected from the concerned Chief

Prosecutors / Incharge, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Abhijeet Singh Chauhan, N – 537, Sector – 25, NOIDA.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no.

419 of Sh. Abhijeet Singh Chauhan. Sir,

Please enclosed herewith the reply of your application under RTI Act vide

I.D No. 419 dated 21.04.2010 contained 08 (Eight) page collected from the

concerned Chief Prosecutors / Incharge, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Smt. Anubha Rastogi, B – 68, IInd Floor, Sarvodaya Enclave, NEW DELHI – 110017

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 416 of Smt. Anubha Rastogi.

Sir,

In reference the letter No.F.2(37)/03/Lit/Vol-II/DS2law/463-465 dated

07.04.2010 of the Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs, please

enclosed herewith the reply of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 416

dated 09.04.2010 contained 08 (Eight) pages collected from the concerned Chief



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. A. U. Khan, Advocate, Chamber No. 468, New Lawyer’s Chambers, Patiala House Courts, NEW DELHI – 110001.


418 of Sh. A. U. Khan. Sir,


I.D No. 418 dated 12.04..2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Addl.



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above




April 22, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 418 dated 12.04.2010

of Sh. A. U. Khan. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- As per section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005, the information cannot be

provided to a Lawyer on behalf of his client, as the power for seeking the

information under RTI Act 2005, cannot be delegated.

(B. S. KAIN) Addl. Public Prosecutor

Link P.I.O.


To, Sh. Bhure Khan, S/o. Sh. Sanaulla Beig, C/o. C.T. Ward No. 5/3, Jail No. 1,

Central Jail, Tihar, DELHI – 110064

Sub: Supply of information in response to RTI Appeal Application Dated

15.04.2010. Sir, Please find enclosed herewith a self explanatory original Order No. 374/Appeal/DOP/2010 dated 20.04.2010, passed by the First Appellate Authority / Director of Prosecution, in the RTI Appeal, as mentioned above. The pointwise / parawise reply has been given by the Appellate Authority, itself, in the enclosed Original Order.

This is for your information. Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above

(PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER) DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION

DELHI

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION: DELHI DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION; GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054. F.No. ID No. 415/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To,

Sh. Rama Swarup Sabherwal, D – 83, Defence Colony, NEW DELHI – 110024.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 415 of Sh. Rama Swarup Sabherwal.

Sir,

In reference the letter No.F.14/63/RTI/2010/HP-II/2087 dated 31.03.2010 of

the Home Department, please enclosed herewith the reply of your application under

RTI Act vide I.D No. 415 dated 05.04..2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from

the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge, Patiala House Courts, Directorate of Prosecution,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Naveen Soni, B 2 / 103, Safdarganj Enclave, NEW DELHI - 110029.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 412 of Sh. Naveen Soni.

Sir,


I.D No. 412 dated 05.04..2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Chief

Prosecutor / Incharge, Karkardooma Courts, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of

NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Amarjeet Singh Bajaj, C – 49, Chhatarpur Enclave, Phase II, NEW DELHI - 110074.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 413 of Sh. Amarjeet Singh Bajaj.

Sir,


I.D No. 413 dated 06.04..2010 contained 11 (Eleven) pages collected from the DOP

Branch, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Amar Kohli, N – 22, Panchsheel Park, NEW DELHI - 110017.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 407 of Sh. Amar Kohli.

Sir,


I.D No. 407 dated 22.03..2010 contained 10 (Ten) pages collected from the Chief

Prosecutor / Incharge, Patiala House Courts, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





SUB:- Reply of RTI Application vide I.D. No. 409/RTI/DOP/10 filed by Shri Amit

Kumar, D – 620, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi – 110032.

It is submitted that the required information as seek by the applicant is as

under pointwise:-

2. The Total filled post of Assistant Public Prosecutor is 70.

3. The total vacant post of Assistant Public Prosecutor is 50.

Submitted please.

P.I.O.



Sh. Ch. Amit Kumar, D – 620, Karkardooma Courts DELHI - 110032.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 409 of Sh. Ch. Amit Kumar.

Sir,


I.D No. 409 dated 30.03..2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the

Administration Branch, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Jitendra Sharma, 174/1, Krishna Bhawan, Hari Nagar Ashram, Mathura Road, NEW DELHI - 14.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 408 of Sh. Jitendra Sharma.

Sir,



Prosecutor / Incharge, Patiala House Court, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I / Public Information Officer, Outer District, Road No. 43, Pushpanjali, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/o. Sh. Rambir under

the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please refer to the letter no. 29/RTI/PIO/2010/ID-0021 dated 01.04.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 1547/DOP dated 06.04.2010 in respect of Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/o. Sh. Rambir under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, the required information pertains to the Police Department as intimated. Therefore, the same is transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls: As above.



Copy to: Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/o. Sh. Rambir, H. No. 125, Pipal Wala Pana, Village Sultanpur Dabas, PO Puth Khurd, Delhi – 110039, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION; GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

R. NO. 160A; TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054.


Sh Sumit Ranjan, Chamber No. D – 319, Karkardooma Courts, DELHI.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 404 of Sh. Sumit Ranjan.

Sir,


I.D No. 404 dated 20.02.2010 in reference of letter no. 574/PIO/ dated 12.03.2010,

contained 10 (Ten) pages collected from the all concerned Chief Prosecutor /

Incharge and Addl.PP, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I / Public Information Officer, New Delhi District, NEW DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Neeraj Chawla under the Right to


Sir, Please refer to your office letter no. 593/DIC/NDD dated 23.03.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 1507/DOP dated 03.04.2010 in respect of Sh. Neeraj Chawla under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, the sanctions are not granted by the Prosecution Department as intimated by DOP branch. Therefore, the same is return back / transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls: As above.



Copy to: Sh. Neeraj Chawla, H. No. 1702/1, Link Road, Near Cheema Chowk, Ludhiana – 141003, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.


DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION; GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054.


The Public Information Officer, Office of the District Judge-III & I/C Addl. Sessions Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Ujjal Das Gupta under Right to


Sir, Please refer to your office letter no. 64/Admn./RTI/West/THC/2010 dated 22.03.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 1389/DOP dated 27.03.2010 in respect of Sh. Ujjal Das Gupta under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, it is mention here that the information sought pertains to your office as intimated DOP branch. Therefore, the same is return back / transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Ujjal Das Gupta, Jail No. – 1, Ward No. – 1, Tihar Jail, Hari Nagar, New Delhi - 110064, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.






Sir,

Please enclosed herewith the partly reply i.e. question no. 1(a), 1(f) and 1(g) of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 405 dated 23.03.2010, contained 02 (Two) pages collected from the concerned branch, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy to:- The Deputy Secretary (Home) / PIO, GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Department, 5th








Sir,






Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above




RTI MATTER



No. /Appeal/DOP/2009 Date To,

Sh. Amit Gupta, B – 6/175, Sector – 08, Rohini, DELHI – 85.


I am in receipt of your Appeal on 22.03.2010. In this connection, you are advised to appear in person before the undersigned at 03:35 P.M. on 29.03.2010, to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this regard.

Yours faithfully



RTI MATTER




Sh. L. N. Aggarwal, Ex. Director (Govt. of India), F – 94, Ram Path, Shyam Nagar, JAIPUR – 302019.



Yours faithfully






Smt. Surbhi Chopra, R/o B-68, Second Floor, Sarvodaya Enclave, NEW DELHI - 110017.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 406 of Ms. Surbhi Chopra.

Madam,


I.D No. 406 dated 05.03.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Addl.PP,

Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy forwarded to the Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police / PIO, West District, Ist Floor, P.S. Rajouri Gar4den, Delhi for information in reference to your letter no. 1861/(1344/09/DIC/(DA-III)West dated 22.02.2010. Appellate Authority : Director, Directorate of Prosecution, Government of NCT of Delhi, R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi – 110054, Tel. No. 23929024.






Madam,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy forwarded to the Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police / PIO, Central District, Darya Ganj, Delhi for information in reference to letter no. 1628-29/RTI Cell/Central District/ dated 27.02.2010. Appellate Authority : Director, Directorate of Prosecution, Government of NCT of Delhi, R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi – 110054, Tel. No. 23929024.

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER

DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION; GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI R. NO. 160A; TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054.




Madam,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








.Madam,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Madam,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above



March 25, 2010

To,


of Ms. Surbhi Chopra. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- In reference to letter no. 1861/(1344/09/DIC/(DA-III)West dated 22.02.2010.

No such record related to the anti-sikh communal violence available with this

Directorate only one case is pending in Patiala House Courts with FIR No. 446/93

P.S. S. N. Puri u/s 147, 148, 149, 395, 436 & 307 IPC S Vs Dhani Ram etc pending

in the Court of Sh. Chender Gupta, ASJ. The next date of hearing is 19.04.2010 for

final arguments of the case.

(B. S. KAIN)

Addl. Public Prosecutor Link P.I.O.

March 25, 2010

To,


of Ms. Surbhi Chopra. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- In reference to letter no. 1628-29/RTI Cell/Central District/ dated 27.02.2010.






(B. S. KAIN)


March 25, 2010

To,








(B. S. KAIN)


March 25, 2010

To,




Directorate pointwise reply is as under:-

1. One case was charge sheeted and Copy is attached.

2. Nil

3. Nil

3. Nil

Only one case is pending in Patiala House Courts with FIR No. 446/93 P.S. S. N.

Puri u/s 147, 148, 149, 395, 436 & 307 IPC S Vs Dhani Ram etc pending in the

Court of Sh. Chender Gupta, ASJ. The next date of hearing is 19.04.2010 for final

arguments of the case.

(B. S. KAIN)







Sub. :Transfer of Application of Ms. Hansa Bhadana the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 1308/DOP dated 23.03.2010 in respect of Ms. Hansa Bhadana under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information :- Ms. Hansa Bhadana, 1794, Prasadi Gali, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi-110003, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



F.No. ID No. 404/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, The Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police / PIO, Establishment,

M.S.O. Building, IInd Floor, I. P. Estate NEW DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Sumit Ranjan, under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application vide letter no. 574/PIO/CRIME, dated 12.03.2010 received in this office vide I.D. No. 404 dated 20.03.2010 in respect of Sh. Sumit Ranjan, Advocate, Chamber No. D-319, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same i.e. question no. 5b as intimated by Addl.PP, Dte. of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi is being transferred to your good office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your office may kindly be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Sumit Ranjan, Advocate, Chamber No. D-319, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

March 20, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 404 of Sh. Sumit

Ranjan. Sir, The pointwise reply of the above RTI is as under:-

1. No policy, it’s administrative matter. 2. There is no fixed term but generally Police Department transfers the Naib

Courts after every 3 to 5 years. 3. The reply of this question can be obtained from all CP/Incharge. 4. No complaint is pending. Whenever any complaint is received the same

be sent to the DCP concerned. 5a The reply of this question can be obtained from all CP/Incharge 5b. The transfers order and cancellation order have been made by the Police

Department. Requisite information may be obtained from Police Department.

(B. S. KAIN)


RTI MATTER

OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY /

DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ; TIS HAZARI COURTS ; DELHI -54


Ms. Jyoti Rajput, 366, 3rd

Pitam Pura, Near Kohat Metro Station, Floor Kohat Enclave,

DELHI - 110075 SUB:- Appeal under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Sir,

I am in receipt of your Appeal 08.03.2010. In this connection, you are advised to appear in person before the undersigned at 03:30 P.M. on 17.03.2010, to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this regard.

Yours faithfully



March 12, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 395 of Sh. Jwala

Prasad. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- The information seeks by Sh. Jwala Prasad resident of F – 66, New Usmanpur,

Delhi-53, does not pertain to this Directorate. This pertains to Police Department.

(B. S. KAIN)





Public Information Officer, New Delhi District, Patiala House Court. New Delhi.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Rajpal Singh, under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 1084/DOP dated 11.03.2010 in respect of Sh. Raj Pal Singh, S/o. Sh. Phool Singh, under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is concerned to your office as intimated by Addl.PP, Dte. of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi is being transferred to your good office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your office may kindly be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Raj Pal Singh, S/o. Sh. Phool Singh, Ward No. 2, Barrack No. 3B, Central Jail No. 1, Tihar, Delhi-64 with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

RTI MATTER



No. /Appeal 27/DOP/2009 Date To,

Sh. Mukul Kumar, A-02, Silver Oak Apartment, 109, I. P. Ext. I, DELHI - 110092


With reference to Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2010/000198/6937 and Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2010/000198, you are advised to appear in person before the undersigned at 03:00 P.M. on 12.03.2010, to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this regard.

Yours faithfully




R. NO. 160A; TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054. F. I.D. No. 399/RTI/DOP/10/ Dated:

Kindly find enclosed herewith RTI applications vide I.D. No.

399/RTI/DOP/10 filed by Ms. Surbhi Chopra, B – 68, IInd Floor, Sarvodaya

Enclave, New Delhi - 110017.


(B. S. Kain) LINK PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER


Copy forwarded to:

1. PP Delhi 2. CP/Inchage, PHC 3. CP/Inchage, Karkardooma 4. CP/Incharge, Dwarka 5. CP/Incharge, Rohini 6. CP/Incharge (North) 7. CP/Incharge (West) 8. CP/Incharge (Central)



F.No. ID No. 390/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, The Addl. Commissioner of Police -1st

North District, / PIO,

Near Police Station, Civil Lines,

DELHI. Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Yash Pal Bhatia, under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 910/DOP dated 25.02.2010 in respect of Sh. Yash Pal Bhatia, 9/2185, Street No. 8, Kailash Nagar, Delhi-31 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same i.e. question no. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 as intimated by Addl.PP, Dte. of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi is being transferred to your good office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your office may kindly be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Yash Pal Bhatia, 9/2185, Street No. 08, Kailash Nagar, Delhi-31 with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

March 09, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 390 of Sh. Yash Pal

Bhatia. Sir, The point-wise reply of the above RTI is as under:-

1. In reply of the question no. 1 it is stated that before registration of the case and filing of the charge sheet the Assistant Public Prosecutor can not appear. It is mentioned here that after registration of the case on the basis of complaint u/s 156(3) titled as Girdhari Lal v/s Yash Pal Bhatia the concerned case had given the direction to the Police to register a case and in compliance of which FIR No. 166/99 was registered in P.S. Bada Hindu Rao.

2. As above

3. In response of query no. 3 it is stated that as soon as any criminal case is

register and charge sheet is filed in pursuance of the FIR. It is statutory duly of the concerned APP to appear in the said case on behalf of state even at the investigation stage also for disposing of miscellaneous application relating to the case.

9. In response of query no. 9 it is stated that the court will take the time and

specific date can not be ascertain for it. 10. The the APP posted in the court concerned is doing his work sincerely and

honestly.


Link P.I.O.




Sh. L. N. Aggarwal, Ex. Director (Govt. of India) F – 94, Ram Path, Shyam Nagar, JAIPUR – 302019.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 388 of Sh. L. N. Aggarwal.

Sir,


I.D No. 388 dated 20.02.2010 contained 10 (Ten) pages collected from the Addl.PP

(Patiala House Court), Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Inder Pal Kalra, S/o. Sh. D. P. Kalra, 3141, Ram Bazaar, Mori Gate, DELHI - 06

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 389 of Sh. Inder Pal Kalra.

Sir,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Amit Gupta, B – 6/175, Sector – 8, Rohini, DELHI-110085.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 392 of sh. Amit Gupta.

Sir,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above




March 08, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. of Ms. Surbhi

Chopra. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- No such record related to the anti-sikh communal violence available with this

Directorate.

(B. S. KAIN)


March 08, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 389 of Sh. Inder Pal

Kalra. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- The application of the applicant Sh. Inder Pal Kalra resident of S/o. Sh. K. P. Kalra,

3141, Ram Bazaar, Mori Gate, Delhi-06, does not disclose the particular of the FIR

under section, police state for which he wants to take the documents. However in

every case list of documents filed by the Investing Officer after the inquiry / during

investigation depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case.

(B. S. KAIN)


March 08, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 392 of Sh. Amit

Gupta. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- The information seeks by Sh. Amit Gupta resident of B – 6/175, Sector – 8, Rohini,

Delhi-85, does not covered under section 2(f) of the under RTI Act as it does not

pertain to our official record.

(B. S. KAIN)




F.No. ID No. 391/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, The Deputy Commissioner of Police, PIO, Riot Cell, PTS, Malviya Nagar, NEW DELHI. Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. V. K. Garg, Advocate, under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 924/DOP dated 02.03.2010 in respect of Sh. V. K. Garg, Advocate,18/1, GF, Shakti Nagar, Delhi-7 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your good office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your office may kindly be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. V. K. Garg, Advocate, 18/1, Ground Floor, Shakti Nagar, Delhi-07 with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Sharma, B – 17, Pandav Nagar, Delh110092.


under seniority wise:-

The Pay Scale of Assistant Public Prosecutor is Rs. 9,300-34,800/- (Grade Pay Rs.

4600/-).

The Pay Scale of Addl. Public Prosecutor is Rs. 15,600-39,100/- (Grade Pay Rs.

5400/-).

The Pay Scale of Chief Public Prosecutor / PP is Rs. 15,600-39,100/- (Grade Pay Rs.

6600/-).

Submitted please.

Head Clerk (Admn. Branch)

P.I.O.




Sh. Amit Sharma, B – 17, Pandav Nagar, DELHI-110092.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 387 dated 19.02.2010.

Sir,


I.D No. 387 dated 19.02.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Admn.



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Bhure Khan, S/o. Sh. Sanaulla Beig, C/o. C.T. Ward No. 5/3, Jail No. 1, Central Jail, Tihar, DELHI-110064.


Sir,


I.D No. 386 dated 19.02.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Chief

Prosecutor / Incharge (North), Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







The Public Information Officer, Administration Branch-I, Tis Hazari Courts, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Bhure Khan, , S/o. Sh. Sanaulla Beig,

Delhi under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 803/DOP dated 19.02.2010 in respect of Sh. Bhure Khan, S/o. Sh. Sanaulla Beig, Delhi under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The same is pertaining to your Office as intimated / remarks by the CP/Incharge (North) (Copy enclosed) may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully, Encls : As above.


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Bhure Khan, S/o. Sh. Sanaulla Beig, C/o. C.T. Ward No. 5/3, Jail No. 1, Central Jail, Tihar, Delhi-110064.




Sh. Jai Parkash Panchal, S/o. Late Sh. Maha Singh, 154/114, Opp. MCD Park, Bawana Road, Pooth Khurd, DELHI - 110039


Sir,


I.D No. 383 dated 09.02.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Accounts

Branch, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted by

you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Sanjay Bhardwaj, C/o. Janta Flat 619, Pocket – 3, Paschim Puri, NEW DELHI - 110063


Sir,


I.D No. 381 dated 04.02.2010 contained 02 (Two) pages collected from the Addl.

Public Prosecutor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application

submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Pitam Pura, Near Kohat Metro Station, Floor, Kohat Enclave,

DELHI


Sir,



Prosecutor (OD), Rohini Courts, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Krishan Dev Pachauri, Flat No. 164, Akashkunj Apartment, Sector – 9, Rohini, DELHI-110085


Sir,

Please enclosed herewith the reply of your application (Point No. 2, 4, 5, 6

and 9) under RTI Act vide I.D No. 384 dated 18.02.2010 contained 02 (Two) pages

collected from the Addl. Public Prosecutor and Accounts Branch, Govt. of NCT of


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above




February 19, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 384 of Sh. Krishan

Dev Pachauri. Sir, The pointwise reply is as under:- 2. That it has been mention in the appointment letter that any duty has been

assigned to the person including the scrutiny of the challans therefore it is part and partial of the duty of the person employed with this Department.

4. That scrutiny of challans is the part and partial duty of the person appointed

with the Department and it is mention in the duties of the person to check the challans for which no additional allowance is provided.


Link P.I.O.

February 10, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 381 of Sh. Sanjay

Bhardwaj. Sir, The pointwise reply is as under:- 1. The Directorate of Prosecution is an independent office and works

independently and separate from the Delhi Police. 2. The Directorate of Prosecution is an independent agency / office and works as

per law without the interference of Commissioner of Police, Delhi. 3. The Commissioner of Police has no right to give any direction regarding

procedure and ways to handle cases in Courts. 4. The certified copy of the order no. 259 may be obtained from the Concerned

Department; however the photo copy of the order is enclosed herewith.


Link P.I.O.




The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Health Services, F – 17, Karkardooma, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Manoj Dhamija, S/o. Late Sh. V. P.

Dhamija, D–732, Saraswati Vihar, Delhi under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 472/DOP dated 29.01.2010 in respect of Sh. Manoj Dhamija, S/o. Late Sh. V. P. Dhamija, D–732, Saraswati Vihar, Delhi under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The same is pertaining to your Office as intimated by the CP/Incharge, Rohini (copy enclosed) may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information :- Sh. Manoj Dhamija, S/o. Late Sh. V. P. Dhamija, D–732, Saraswati Vihar,Delhi



F.No. ID No. 373/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, Addl. Deputy Commissioner Police-I / PIO South District, Near P S Haujkhas, NEW DELHI. Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Praveen Narang, C – 68, Dayanand

Colony, Lajpat Nagar – IV, New Delhi-110024 under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 316/DOP dated 21.01.2010 in respect of Sh. Praveen Narang, C – 68, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar – IV, New Delhi-110024 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The some part of the requisite information i.e. Q. No. (i) is pertaining to your Office as intimated by Addl.PP, Govt. of NCT of Delhi (copy enclosed), may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information :- Sh. Praveen Narang, C – 68, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar – IV, New Delhi-110024




The Deputy Director (Litigation) / PIO, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, GLNS Complex, Delhi Gate, NEW DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Praveen Narang, C – 68, Dayanand


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 316/DOP dated 21.01.2010 in respect of Sh. Praveen Narang, C – 68, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar – IV, New Delhi-110024 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The some part of the requisite information i.e. Q. No. (ii) to (v) are pertaining to your Office as intimated by the Addl.PP, Govt. of NCT of Delhi (copy enclosed), may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,




Feburary 05, 2010

To, The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 373 of Sh. Praveen

Narang. Sir, The pointwise reply is as under:-

i) This question is related to the SHO, Badarpur.

ii) to v) These questions are related to the Social Welfare Department.

(B. S. KAIN) ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

LINK P.I.O.




Sh. Pearey Lal Sareen 6127, C/6-7, Vasant Kunj, NEW DELHI-110070


Sir,


I.D No. 375 dated 22.01.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the

CP/Incharge, Patiala House Court, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Ramesh Verma, 10, Bindal Dharamshala Market, Bazar Vakilan, Hissar (HARYANA)

SUB: Reply of transfer of Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 366 dated 14.01.2010.

Sir,


I.D No. 366 dated 14.01.2010 contained 29 (Twenty Nine) pages collected from the

DOP Branch, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted

by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







The Public Information Officer, Administration Branch - I, Tis Hazari Courts, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Sandeep @ Sanju, 244, Kotla Mubarakpur, Aliganj, Delhi-110003 under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 517/DOP dated 01.02.2010 in respect of Sh. Sandeep @ Sanju, 244, Kotla Mubarakpur, Aliganj, Delhi-110003 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 as intimated by CP/Incharge, Patiala House Court, GNCT of Delhi (copy enclosed) for necessary action. The requisite informations are pertaining to your Office, may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information :- Sh. Sandeep @ Sanju, 244, Kotla Mubarakpur, Aliganj, Delhi-110003.






Sir,


I.D No. 365 dated 07.01.2010 contained 08 (Eight) pages collected from the DOP


you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above










Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 19/DOP dated 04.01.2010 in respect of Sh. Praveen Narang, C – 68, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar – IV, New Delhi-110024 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The some part of the requisite information i.e. Q. 06 to 11 are pertaining to your Office, may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,







Sh. Praveen Narang, C – 68, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar – IV, NEW DELHI - 110024


Sir,


I.D No. 361 dated 04.01.2010 contained six pages collected from the Addl. Public

Prosecutor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted by

you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Ashutosh Bharadwaj, C – 11, Gaurav Apartment, Patparganj, I. P. Extn., DELHI – 92.


Sir,


I.D No. 370 dated 14.01.2010 contained page collected from the Caretaker /



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





SUB:- Reply of RTI Application vide I.D. No. 367/RTI/DOP filed by Sh. Ashutosh

Bharadwaj, C-11, Gaurav Apartments, Patparganj, I.P. Extn., Delhi-92.

The reply of point no. 3 (ii) and (iii) are as under:-

Total no. of Public

Prosecutor

1994 1996 1999 2005 2009

Joined

Subsequently Left the Job

This information is prepared as per the PBRs records.

Submitted please.

Head Clerk (Admn. Branch) P.I.O.






Sir,


I.D No. 367 dated 14.01.2010 contained page collected from the concerned

Courts, Administration Branch and Accounts Branch, Directorate of Prosecution,


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







It is submitted that the required information as seek by the applicant is not

available with the Directorate as given the question in the tabular form. The present

position of Prosecutors and other Staff of all the courts of Govt. of NCT of Delhi in

December, 2009 are enclosed herewith contained pages as collected by the DOP

Branch.

Submitted please.





Sh. Anil Sood, President, Chetna, A – 417-418, Somdutt Chamber – 1, 5, Bhikajicama Place, NEW DELHI – 110066.


Sir,


I.D No. 371 dated 14.01.2010 contained one page collected from the Addl. Public


you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








SUB: Reply of Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 368 dated 14.01.2010.

Sir,


I.D No. 368 dated 14.01.2010 contained two pages collected from the Addl. Public

Prosecutor and Accounts Branch, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt of NCT of Delhi

and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







The Deputy Secretary(Home) / PIO, GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Department, 5th


Sub: Reply of Transferred Application of Sh. Shyamlal Shukla,

Advocate/Journalist, Manakpur, Gonda, U.P. under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, A transferred application of your RTI is received on 21-01-2010 by this office. Point wise reply of the RTI in respect of this office is as under: SR No

Question No Reply

1 Question No 1,3,4 and 5 Does not pertain to this office. 2. Question No 2 The reply of the question is not possible

due to lack of details in the question itself.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information to Sh. Shyamlal Shukls, Advocate/Journalist, Manakpur, Gonda, U.P.

January 22, 2010

To, The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 371 of Sh. Anil Sood. Sir, The pointwise reply is as under:- 1. (a) Yes (b) The Public Prosecutors are directed orally to accept plea bargaining and there

is no written instructions issued to the officers, they have to follow the provision of the law.

(c) The provision given in the CRPC are to be followed by the Public Prosecutors.

(d) Since the particulars of case and person not given, so question is vague and no need answer.

2. Nil 3. Nil


Link P.I.O.




The Deputy Secretary(Home)/PIO, GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Department, 5th


Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Ashutosh Bharadwaj, C-11, Gaurav

Apartments, Patparganj, I.P. Exn. Delhi-110092 under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 163/DOP dated 14.01.2010 in respect of Sh. Ashutosh Bharadwaj, C-11, Gaurav Apartments, Patparganj, I.P. Extn. Delhi-110092 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The some part of the requisite information i.e. Q. No. 3 (i) pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information :- Sh. Ashutosh Bharadwaj, C-11, Gaurav Apartments, Patparganj, I.P. Estn. Delhi-110092

January 22, 2010

To, The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 368 of Sh. Ashutosh

Bharadwaj. Sir, The pointwise reply is as under:- 1. There is no prescribed syllabus for the examination, however question regarding G.K.

asked. 2. There is no specific period for a Public Prosecutor undergo compulsory induction

training before assigning the full-fledged charge of criminal court. 3. The Department circulated the various reoriented training programme held at different

Govt. Department and asked time to time to participate the officers enriching the legal knowledge of the officers.

4. There is no any refreshing training programme period reoriented courses are attend by some officer on different dates particularly NICFSIC.

5. No such programmes 6. No such courses are prescribed. 7. No such programme is available in the office. 8. The Department is providing the generals at free of cost. 9. The answer of this question is already given and no such details are available. 10. No such programmes are available in this Department. The Prosecutors gain experience

through in practice and day to day work in the concerned court. 11. There is no specific period. 12. Various programme were conducted 13. No such period is available in the Department. 14. There is no specific training programme on the subject in question. However the

Department has circulated various reoriented training programme held at different Govt. Department to the Prosecutors. No such syllabus is available in the Department.

15. There are no details of the compulsory programme. 16. No Seminar 17. The bare acts and commentary on the special Acts like Arms Act, N.D.P.S. Act, Copy

right Act, MACOCA etc. are available in the library for consultation. 18. The Punjab Police rules are available in the library of the Department for consultations.

(B. S. KAIN)


January 21, 2010



1. Sh. N. K. Verma, Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. Photo copies attached for date-wise movement 3. Already attached and applicant may obtained the certified copy for the

Court. 4. Already attached and applicant may obtained the certified copy for the

Court. 5. No such report is available in the Directorate of Prosecution and the

applicant may obtain the certified copy from the coping agency, Patiala House Courts.

6-11 These questions are related to the Social Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi.


Link P.I.O.




Sh. Radhey Shyam Agrawal, 20, Nirman Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase – I Estn. DELHI - 110091

SUB: Transfer of Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 372 dated 18.01.2010.

Sir,


I.D No. 372 dated 18.01.2010 contained one page collected from the Chief

Prosecutor/Incharge, Karkardooma Courts, Govt of NCT of Delhi and this disposes


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I/Public Information Officer, East District, Vishwas Nagar, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Radhey Shyam Agrawal, 20, Nirman

Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase – I Extn. Delhi-110091 under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 240/DOP dated 18.01.2010 in respect of Sh. Radhey Shyam Agrawal, 20, Nirman Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase – I Extn. Delhi-110091, under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information (Copy enclosed and one page collected from Chief Prosecutor/Incharge, Karkardooma Courts regarding this RTI). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.



Copy to: Sh. Radhey Shyam Agrawal, 20, Nirman Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Phase – I Extn., Delhi-110091




To,

Sh. Harish Chauhan, A - 58, Amrit Nagar, NEW DELHI - 110003

SUB: Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 360 dated 24.12.2009.

Sir,




you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above




RTI MATTER




Smt. Hema D’Souza 82, Sector 2, Pocket 1, Dwarks, Phase 1, NEW DELHI - 110075


I am in receipt of your Appeal 11/01/2010. In this connection, you are advised to appear in person before the undersigned at 03:15 P.M. on 22/01/2010, to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this regard.

Yours faithfully



RTI MATTER


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ; TIS HAZARI COURTS ; DELHI -54


Dr. Inder Kumar Gupta R/o 1/5926 A, Kabool Nagar Shahadara Delhi – 110 032.

Sub. :Appeal against the Information Provided By Public Information

Officer, Dte. of Prosecution vide letter dated 04/01/2010. Sir,

I am in receipt of your Appeal against the information provided by P.I.O. of this Directorate vide letter dated 04/01/2010.

In this connection, you are advised to appear in person before the

undersigned at 03:30 P.M. on 22/01/2010, to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this regard.

Yours faithfully




R. NO. 160A; TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054. F.No.I.D.No. 367/RTI/DOP/ Dated:

Kindly find enclosed herewith RTI applications vide I.D. No. 367/RTI/DOP

filed by Sh. Ashutosh Bharadwaj, C-11, Gaurav Apartments, Patparganj, I. P. Extn.

Delhi – 92 as the Question No. 2 & 4 are related to your office.




Copy to :-

1. Public Prosecutor / Delhi 2. All Chief Prosecutors / Incharges

Rohini Courts Dwarka Courts Karkardooma Courts Patiala House Courts


R. NO. 160A; TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054. F.No.I.D.No. 367/RTI/DOP/ Dated: Kindly find enclosed herewith RTI applications vide I.D. No. 367/RTI/DOP


Delhi – 92 as the Question No. 1 is related to Accounts Branch.




A.A.O. / Accounts Branch Dte. of Prosecution, DELHI




Sh. Praveen Narang, Environmentalist, Vanaspati Sanrakshan, NGO, C-68, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar-IV, NEW DELHI - 110024


Sir,


I.D No. 357 dated 22.12.2009 contained Seven pages collected from the Addl.


submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Yashpal Bhatia, B/O. Sh. Jawahar Bhatia, 9/2185, Kailash Nagar, Gali No. 08, DELHI - 110031


Sir,


I.D No. 359 dated 22.12.2009 contained two pages collected from the office of the

Chief Prosecutor/Incharge (North), Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sh. Jacob, George, 439 H Pocket II, Mayur Vihar, Phase-I DELHI - 110091

SUB: Transfer of application under the “Right Information Act’2005” vide I.D. No. 362 dated 04.01.2010 filed by Sh. Jacob George.

Sir,


I.D No. 362 dated 04.01.2010 contained one page collected from the office of the

Chief Prosecutor/Incharge of Patiala House Courts, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above

(KULDEEP SINGH) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER





Sh. V. D. Narang, B-1 / 2-3, Zamrudpur, NEW DELHI-110048


Sir,


I.D No. 355 dated 18.12.2009 contained one page collected from Additional Public


you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I/Public Information Officer, Central District, Near P.S., Dariyaganj, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Gulshan Kumar S/o. Sh. Ved Parkash,

13/86 FF, Subhash Nagar, Near Shedlay Public School, New Delhi-110027 under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 98/DOP dated 07.01.2010 in respect of Sh. Ved Parkash, 13/86 FF, Subhash Nagar, Near Shedlay Public School, New Delhi-110027 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information (Copy enclosed). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.


DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION Copy to: Sh. Ved Parkash, 13/86 FF, Subhash Nagar, Near Shedlay Public School, New Delhi-110027



To,

Sh. Santosh Kaushik, C-676, Sudershan Park NEW DELHI.

SUB: Reply of Appeal 22/RTI/DOP dated 15.12.2009 regarding case FIR No. 1119/07, P.S. Malviya Nagar – Supply of Information.

Please enclosed herewith the reply of your Appeal application above

mentioned under RTI Act contained Nine pages collected from CP/Incharge, Patiala

House Courts and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION Appellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024



To,

Sh. Syed Nusrat Ali, Editor-in-chief, Hindustan Today, 98, Bharat Ram Road, Dariya Ganj, NEW DELHI - 110002,




Prosecutor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted

by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





To,

Sh. Surendra Mishra, Advocate, 3A/86m 2nd

NEW DELHI - 110005, Floor, W.E.A. Karol Bagh,

SUB: Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 356 dated

18.12.2009.


I.D No. 356 dated 18.12.2009 contained one page collected from Chief

Prosecutor/West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





To,

Sh. Moti Lal, S/o. Sh. Ganga Ram, 16/549-E, Bapa Nagar, Padam Singh Road, Karol Bagh, NEW DELHI - 110005


15.12.2009.


I.D No. 354 dated 15.12.2009 contained pages collected from Public Prosecutor,


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





To,

Sh. Inder Kumar Gupta, 1/5926 A, Kabool Nagar, Shahdara, DELHI-110032 .


11.12.2009.


I.D No. 352 dated 09.12.2009 contained pages collected from Chief

Prosecutor/Incharge / Karkardooma Court and this disposes off the application

submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





To,

Sh. Ramesh Verma, 10, Bindal Dharmashala Market, Bazar Vakilan, Hissar, HARYANA .

SUB: - Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 351dated

09.12.2009.


I.D No. 351 dated 09.12.2009 contained one page collected from DOP Branch and


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Ramesh Verma, 10, Bindal Dharmashala

Market, Bazar Vakilan, Hissar, (HARYANA) under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 10013/DOP dated 09.12.2009 in respect of Sh. Ramesh Verma, 10, Bindal Dharmashala Market, Bazar Vakilan, Hissar, (HARYANA) under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The some part of the requisite information as intimated by worthy DOP branch (Copy enclosed) i.e. question no. 03 (i) pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,


(KULDEEP SINGH)

Public Information Officer Directorate of Prosecution

Copy for information :- Sh. Ramesh Verma, 10, Bindal Dharmashala Market, Bazar Vakilan, Hissar, (HARYANA).



F.No. ID No. 349/RTI/DOP/2009/ Dated: Kindly find enclosed herewith an RTI application ( I.D. No. 355/RTI/DOP/)

dated 18.12.2009 filed by Sh. V. D. Narang, B-1/2-3, Zamrudpur, New Delhi-

110048. The requisite information pertains to your office as intimated by Chief

Prosecutor/Incharge (Central) (Copy enclosed), may kindly be provided (point wise)

within 03 (three) days on separate page.


INCHARGE/CHIEF PROSECUTOR, PATIALA HOUSE COURTS, NEW DELHI




The Central Public Information Officer/Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, West District, 1st

NEW DELHI Floor P.S. Rajouri Garden,

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Surendra Mishra, Advocate, 3A/86, 2nd

Floor, W.E.A. Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 10176/DOP dated 18.12.2009 in respect of Sh. Surendra Mishra, Advocate, 3A/86, 2nd

Floor, W.E.A. Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office as informed by CP/Incharge (West) (Copy enclosed). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application.

Thanking you, Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.

(KULDEEP SINGH)


Copy to: 1 Sh. Mukul Kumar, R/o. A-02, Silver Oak Apartment, 109, IP Extension Delhi-110092



To,

Sh. Bhu Dutt Sharma, Advocate, Chamber No. D-501, Karkardooma Courts, DELHI.

SUB: - Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 344 dated

01.12.2009


I.D No. 344 dated 01.12.2009 contained three pages collected from concerned

branch i.e. Incharge/CP, Karkardooma Court and this disposes off the application

submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


Appellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054. Tel. No. 23929024



To,

Sh. Shyam Sunder, S/o. Sh. Mani Ram, F-75, IInd Floor, Dilshad Colony, Seemapuri, DELHI.


04.12.2009


I.D No. 349 dated 04.12.2009 contained one page collected from concerned branch

i.e. Incharge/CP, Karkardooma Court and this disposes off the application

submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Mukul Kumar, R/o. A-02, Silver Oak

Apartment, 109, IP Extension Delhi-110092 under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 10017/DOP dated 09.12.2009 in respect of Sh. Mukul Kumar, R/o. A-02, Silver Oak Apartment, 109, IP Extension Delhi-110092. under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information i.e. question no. 06 pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,


(KULDEEP SINGH)






To,



SUB: - Transfer of application in r/o. from Ms. Surbhi Chopra, R/o B-68, 2nd

Floor, Savodaya Enclave, New Delhi (ID 20205)

Sir,

Please refer to your letter No. F.14/136/RTI/2009/HP-II/8893 dated

27.11.2009 on the subject cited above, the desired information is enclosed herewith

submitted by Sh. B. S. Kain, Addl.PP for further necessary action.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


Copy for information to Ms. Surbhi Chopra, R/o B-68, 2nd

Floor, Savodaya Enclave, New Delhi.



To,

Sh. Puneet Goel, D-306, Lawyers Chamber, Karkardooma Court, Delhi-91


20.11.2009




Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






dated 04.12.2009 filed by Sh. Shyam Sunder, S/O. Sh. Mani Ram, F-75, IInd Floor,

Dilshad Colony, Seemapuri, Delhi. The requisite information may kindly be

provided within 03 (three) days.


INCHARGE/CHIEF PROSECUTOR, KARKARDOOMA COURT, DELHI



To,

Sh. Surendra Mishra, Advocate, 3A/86, IInd Floor, W.E.A., Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005. SUB: - Application under Right to Information Act’2005.

With reference to your RTI application, as per section 6 of Right

Information Act, 2005 the information cannot be provided to an applicant/lawyer on

behalf of his clients or any other person, as the powers for seeking the information

under RTI Act, 2005 cannot be delegated as per opinion of Additional Public

Prosecutor in this matter.

(KULDEEP SINGH)




SUB: - Reply under RTI ACT Application of I.D No. 341 dated 20.11.2009 of Sh. Puneet Goel. B.

(i) The name of Nodel Officer is Shri Suresh Chandra Sharma, Addl.PP.

(ii) 10.03.2006

(iii) Copy enclosed

(iv) No (Copy enclosed)

READER TO NODEL OFFICER

(NODEL

OFFICER)

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION : DELHI

DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION; GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI


(v) Deptt. Name is Directorate of Prosecution, Tis Hazari Courts Complex, Tix Hazari, Delhi-54 and Head of Department is Home Department, GNCT of Delhi, Delhi Secretariat, Delhi.

(vi) The name of Nodel Officer is Shri Suresh Chandra Sharma, Addl.PP.

(vii) As (i)

(viii) As (i)

(ix) Not Applicable

(x) Not Applicable

(xi) Nil

(xii) Nil

(xiii) Not Applicable


NODEL OFFICER (LIT.)



F.No. ID No. 683/RTI/DOP/Estt./2012/ Dated:

To, The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Sub: - RTI Application of Shri Naresh Kumar Verma (ID No.683). With reference to your letter No.ID/693/RTI/DOP/2012/553, dated 16.02.2012 on the subject cited above, the information under RTI Act-2005 sought by the applicant as per Service Record is as under:- S.No. Information sought Information furnished







(RAJ KUMAR)

OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT


F.No. ID No.702 /RTI-05/DOP/2010/ Dated:

To,

Sh. K.Sharma, M/s Sun Air Hotel, The Metropolitan Hotel, Bangla Sahib Marg, New Delhi-110001. Sub: - Information sought under Right to Information Act-2005. In continuation of the orders of the 1st

2. The role of the Screening Committee is totally different. Ld. A.P.P. takes

steps as per section 321 of Cr.P.C.

Appellate Authority, the revised

information on point no. 1 & 4 is as under:-

(B.S.Kain)

Public Information Officer/ Addl. Public Prosecutor,





To, Sh. Naresh Kumar Verma,

S/o Shri Ram Kumar Verma, H.No.302, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi.

Sub: - Information sought under Right to Information Act-2005. With reference to your application dated 15.02.2012 to the undersigned under Right to Information Act-2005, the point wise information sought by you is as under:- S.No. Information sought Information furnished







(B. S. KAIN)


1st

Appellate Authority- Chief Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 174, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi – 110054

RTI MATTER



No. 32/Appeal/DOP/2010 Date To,

Sh. Masood Ahmad, C-1/50, Yamuna Vihar, DELHI – 110053.


I am in receipt of your Appeal on 04.08.2010. In this connection, you are

advised to appear in person before the undersigned at 03:00 P.M. on 12.08.2010,

to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this

regard.

Yours faithfully




F.No. ID No. 448-A/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To,


North East District, Office location: Seelampur DELHI.

SUB:- Transfer of Application of Sh. Jwala Prasad under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3435/DOP dated 09.07.2010 in respect of Sh. Jwala Prasad under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information (Copy enclosed). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.

(B. S. KAIN)


Copy to: Sh. Jwala Prasad F – 66, New Usmanpur, Delhi - 53, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.




SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 446 of Sh. Rajesh Gupta.

Sir,


21. Lokesh Kumar, ACMM, KKD and Ankur Jain, MM KKD Court. 22. Kaveri Baweja CMM, Manish Yaduvanshi, MM Tis Hazari, Sidharth

Mathur, MM Tis Hazari. 23. Yes 24. 10 AM to 5 PM. 25. He has not availed any Earned Leave and Medical Leave. 26. Yes. 27. Residing with each other in Govt. Accommodation allotted to Kiran

Bansal. 28. Kiran Bansal. 29. Question is vague and out of preview of RTI. Information under RTI can

be given only to a record maintained in office. Applicant is asked to disclose where such record in kept. Even otherwise he never takes any advantage for the same.

30. He always files his return. 31. He filed the same with income tax office and same may be asked from

the income tax office. 32. He has one working account in SBI. 33. It is personal question and can not ask under RTI. Even otherwise he

never purchased any thing from that area. 34. It is personal question and can not ask under RTI. Even otherwise he can

not give the phone number of all of my relatives to a person who wasted his time in such a mischievous application.

35. No. 36. He only visited his relative during this period without expenses. Details

of the same are personal.

-2-

37. Regarding performance of as APP, a report from Chief Prosecutor / Central Distt. Court Complex, Tis Hazari, Delhi is attached herewith.

38. Since 2003. One of such Judge resides there. 39. There is no vehicle in his name. They have one car and motorcycle in

name is his wife. Same were purchased after taking loan from SBI and SBBJ.

40. It is personal question and can not ask under RTI. Even otherwise it is not concerned with official duty.

Yours faithfully,









447 of Smt. Jaya Kakkar. Sir,



the Chief Prosecutor, South District, Patiala House Courts, Directorate of

Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, contained 01 (One) page and this disposes off










450 of Smt. Jaya Kakkar. Sir, With reference to your RTI application transferred from the office of the

Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police, South District, New Delhi received in this

office on dated 07.07.2010. In this context, it is submitted that the legal opinion is

already sent to the applicant vide no. F.No. I.D. No. 439/RTI/DOP/2010/412-413

dated 09.06.2010.

However, in view of your RTI application, the legal opinion is once again

forwarded to you and this disposes off the application submitted by you.






Sh. Masood Ahmad, C – 1 / 50, Yamuna Vihar, DELHI - 110053

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 445 of Sh. Masood Ahmad.

Sir,



the Public Prosecutor, Delhi and Administration Branch, Directorate of Prosecution,



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Sir,

Please find the copy of the reply received from the Standing Counsel, Crl.,

Govt. of NCT of Delhi, in respect of your RTI application vide ID No. 443 received

in this office on dated 15.06.2010.

Yours faithfully,

(B. S. KAIN)





The Sr. Manager (P&SO) / Public Information Officer, Delhi Transport Cooperation, BBM Complex, NEW DELHI - 9.

SUB:- Transfer of Application of Sh. Hari Kishan Nijhawan under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3491/DOP dated 13.07.2010 in respect of Sh. Hari Kishan Nijhawan under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information (Copy enclosed). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls: As above.

(B. S. KAIN)


DELHI Copy to: Sh. Hari Kishan Nijhawan, Hon’y General Secretary, Paardarshita Public Welfare foundation, B 6 / 69-A, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi - 110029, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.





Central District, Near P.S., Dariyaganj, DELHI.

SUB:- Transfer of Application of Sh. Vivek Sawhney under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3379/DOP dated 06.07.2010 in respect of Sh. Vivek Sawhney under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information (Copy enclosed). Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.

(B. S. KAIN)


Copy to: Sh. Vivek Sawhney, 24 – Kamla Market, New Delhi – 110002, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Sh. S. K. Dash, Addl.PP, Patiala House Courts, NEW DELHI .

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 444 of Sh. S. K. Dash, Addl.PP.

Sir,



the Accounts Branch, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, contained

02 (Two) pages and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








This has reference to your application dated 30.06.2010, received in this

Directorate vide diary no. 3267/DOP dated 03.07.2010, seeking information

regarding Sh. Praveen Bansal, APP.

In this connection, it is inform you that kindly send the Indian Postal Order

(as RTI fees) in favour of Director of Prosecution or Public Information Officer,

Directorate of Prosecution, Delhi instead of Chief Prosecutor (South – East) District,

Patiala House Court earliest, so that information under RTI Act be supplied to you

within the stipulated period.

Yours faithfully,





To,






In this connection, it is inform you that kindly disclosed the full particulars

of the case i.e. F.I.R. No., under section, name of the case and name of the Police

Station.

You are therefore, requested to disclose the name of the Police Station

earliest, so that information under RTI Act be supplied to you within the stipulated

period.

Yours faithfully,


DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION







In this connection, it is to inform you that Directorate of Prosecution is not

the custodian of police file or any other document pertaining to the Criminal case.

Hence, it is advisable, that you may approach to the competent police authorities for

the said documents, sought vide your above-mentioned RTI Application.

Further, it should also be ensured before applying for the said documents

with the competent police authorities that complete details of the case i.e. police

station etc. should be mentioned in the application.

This dispose of your application dated 03/07/2010

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above

(PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION




The Standing Counsel, GOVT. OF N.C.T. of Delhi, High Court of Delhi, NEW DELHI.

SUB: Transfer of Application of Sh. V. D. Narang under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3146/DOP dated 15.06.2010 in respect of Sh. V. D. Narang under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,




Copy for information:- Sh. V. D. Narang, B – 1 / 2-3, Zamrudpur, New Delhi – 110048, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

RTI MATTER MOST IMMIDIATE



MEMORANDUM

With reference to the RTI application (attached with this memo) vide I.D

No. 446 moved by Sh. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate, Central Hall, Patiala House

Courts, New Delhi which is relating to you. It’s necessary to call upon you

to file the reply / written submission within 03 days, so that the information

can be supplied to the applicant within stipulated time.

Further you are directed to send your comments / reply by 06.07.2010

positively.

(B. S. KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATIOIN OFFICER






SUB: Transfer of Application of Sh. Masood Ahmad, Addl.PP under the Right

to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 3285/DOP dated 01.07.2010 in respect of Sh. Masood Ahmad, Addl.PP under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information i.e. Q. No. 3 & 4 pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,




Copy for information:- Sh. Masood Ahmad, C – 1 / 50, Yamuna Vihar, Delhi - 110053, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.








PP / Delhi, Dte. Of Prosecution Delhi.






(B. S. KAIN) PUBLIC INFORMATION

OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION

DELHI HEAD CLERK / Grade II (DASS) DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION





Sir,


5. Kindly contact the Standing Counsel, High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. 5-11 Kindly contact the Standing Counsel, High court of Delhi at New Delhi. 11-13 The Department of Law & Justice and Legislative Affairs, GNCTD has approved

the case and observed it is a fit case for filing the appeal. Further reply for reasons for not filing the appeal may be asked from the Standing Counsel, High Court of Delhi, New Delhi.

17. No penalty has been imposed on PIO. 18. Appellate Authority / Director, Dte. Of Prosecution, GNCT of Delhi, R. No. 159,

Tis Hazari Court, Delhi-54. 19. We have no records to this facts and same may be asked from the Office of the

Standing Counsel, High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. 20. It is a matter of record and needs no reply. 17-21 Kindly contact the Standing Counsel, High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. 21. Needs no reply.


Yours faithfully,

(B. S. KAIN)





The Assistant Public Information Officer (Traffic), Office of the Dy. Commissioner of Police: Traffic (HQ), 1st

R. K. Puram, Floor, PS R. K. Puram, Sector – 12,

NEW DELHI. SUB:- Transfer of Application of Ms. Hema D’Souza under the Right to


Sir, Please refer to your office letter no. F.363/RTI/ACT/10/2267/RTI Cell/Tr. dated 01.06.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 3030/DOP dated 08.06.2010 in respect of Ms. Hema D’Souza under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, it is submitted that the requisite information does not pertain to this Directorate as intimated by DOP branch. Therefore, the same is return back / transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls: As above.

(B. S. KAIN)


DELHI Copy to: Ms. Hema D’Souza, 82, Sector 2, Pocket 1, Ph. 1, New Delhi - 75, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Sh. Rajiv Garg, A – 240, Sudershan Park NEW DELHI - 110015

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 437 of Sh. Rajiv Garg.

Sir,



the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge (West), Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of

Delhi, contained 01 (One) page and this disposes off the application submitted by

you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






To, The Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, Room No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 SUB:- An application under Right to Information Act, 2005 in r/o. Ms. Jaya

Kakkar. Sir, With reference to your order no. case No. CIC/WB/A/2009/000147 dated

07.05.2010 on the subject cited above. In this context, it is submitted that the reply

of the application is already sent to the applicant vide no. F.No. I.D. No.

431/RTI/DOP/2010/403-404 dated 05.06.2010

However, in view of your order the reply of the said RTI application is

once again forwarded to the applicant as well as to office of your goodself.



Copy to- Smt. Jaya Kakkar, H. No. B – 2575, Gali No. 66, Sant Nagar, Burari, DELHI – 110084.



Sh. Jitender Kaur, 7091 / 10, Mata Rameshwari, Nehru Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 435 of Sh. Jitender Kaur.

Sir,



the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge (Central), Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT

of Delhi, contained 01 (One) page and this disposes off the application submitted by

you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





F.No. I.D. No. 434/RTI/DOP/10/ Dated:

Kindly find enclosed herewith RTI application vide I.D. No.

434/RTI/DOP/2010 filed by Sh. V. D. Narang, B–1/2 – 3, Zamrudpur, New Delhi –

110048 as the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge (Central) has requested that the requisite

information may be obtained from the office of Ld. PP/Delhi as the case has already

been decided by the trial Court i.e. CMM Court.




Public Prosecutor / Delhi.



The Central Public Information Officer-cum-Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police-I,

Office of the Central Public Information Officer-cum-Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police – I, West District, Ist Floor P.S. Rajouri Garden, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Ms. Anubha Rastogi under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please refer to the letter no. 5485/(848/10/DIC/(DA-II)/West dated 26.05.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 2953/DOP dated 02.06.2010 in respect of Ms. Anubha Rastogi under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, the required information pertains to your office. Therefore, the same is transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.



Copy to: Ms. Anubha Rastogi, B-68, IInd Floor, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Smt. Radhika Nandrajog, TG – 2C / 14, Garden Estate, Gurgaon, HARYANA - 122002.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 432 of Smt. Radhika Nandrajog.

Sir,






Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Smt. Jaya Kakkar, H. No. B – 2575, Gali No. 66, Sant Nagar, Burari, DELHI – 110084.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 431 of Smt. Jaya Kakkar.

Sir,




Govt. of NCT of Delhi, contained 12 (Twelve) pages and this disposes off the


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Lalit Kumar, Flat No. 109/A-1, Himalaya Apartment, Sector-2, Rohini, DELHI – 110085.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 424 of Lalit Kumar.

Sir,


7. NIL 8. The pay scale of Public Prosecutors are as under:-

S. No. Designation Pay Scale 1. Asstt. Public Prosecutor Rs. 9,300 – 34,800 (Grade Pay

Rs. 4,600/-) 2. Addl. Public Prosecutor Rs. 15,600 – 39,100 (Grade Pay

Rs. 5,400/-) 3. Chief Prosecutor Rs. 15,600 – 39,100 (Grade Pay

Rs. 6,600/-)

9. According to R R Rules of 2004. (photocopy enclosed) 10. The duties of Asstt. Public Prosecutor is to conduct cases on behalf of the State in the

Courts of Metropolitan Magistrate / ACMM /CMM, Delhi and also to render legal advice in the cases referred for the purpose and the duties of Addl. Public Prosecutor is to conduct cases in the Courts of Addl. Distt. & Session Judges, Delhi on behalf of Govt. of NCT of Delhi and also to render Legal Advise in the cases referred for the purpose.

11. No, the Asstt. Public Prosecutor and Public Prosecutors are not getting any Non-practicing Allowance (NPA)

12. No, there is no time scale promotion / grant of next higher scale after completion of specific period in the lower post.


Yours faithfully,

(B. S. KAIN)





The Deputy Secretary -II (H & FW) / PIO, Health and Family Welfare Department, Room No. 903, 9th

A - Wing, Delhi Secretariat, Level,

I. P. Estate, NEW DELHI. Sub. :Transfer of Application of Ms. Manju Aggarwal under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 2401/DOP dated 29.05.2010 in respect of Ms. Manju Aggarwal under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,




Copy for information:- Ms. Manju Aggarwal, Advocate, K – 16, Jangpura Ext., New Delhi – 110014, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.





SUB: Transfer of Application of Sh. K. K. Singh, Retd. Chief Prosecutor

under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 2320/DOP dated 21.05.2010 in respect of Sh. K. K. Singh, Retd. Chief Prosecutor under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,




Copy for information:- Sh. K. K. Singh, Retd. Chief Prosecutor, 66, Medha Apartments, Mayur Vihar, Ph. I, Delhi-110091, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



To, The Under Secretary & Dy. Registrar, Central Information Commission, Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Camus, New Delhi – 110067 SUB:- Complaint received under Section 18 of the RTI Act, 2005. Sir, With reference to your letter no. File No. CID/SG/C/2010/000676 dated 24.05.2010 on the subject cited above. In this connection it is submitted that the partly reply of the application under RTI Act has been dispatched vide no. 405/RTI/DOP/2010/356/546 dated 27.03.2010 and vide no. 424/RTI/DOP/2010/383/572 dated 05.05.2010 and some questions of the application under RTI Act have been transferred to the Deputy Secretary (Home) / PIO, Home Department vide letter no. 405/RTI/DOP/2010/339 dated 23.03.2010. But the envelopes containing the reply have been returned to the office by postal department with remarks that “No such person at this address”. However, in view of your order the reply of the said RTI application is once again forwarded to the applicant as well as to office of your goodself.



Copy to- Ms. Hansa Bhadana, 1794, Prasadi Gali, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi – 110003.



Sh. Rajiv Kumar A – 240, Sudershan Park New Delhi – 110 015.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 429 of Sh. Rajiv Kumar.

Sir,



the Chief Prosecutor / West District of this Directorate contained 02 (Two) page and


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above







Sir,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Sub. :Transfer of Application of Ms. Anjali Gupta under Right to


Sir, Please refer to the letter no. F.14/82/RTI/2010/HP-II/2999 dated 06.05.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 2104/DOP dated 10.05.2010 in respect of Ms. Anjali Gupta under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The some requisite information pertaining to your Office as intimated by the Chief Prosecutor, Rohini Courts (copy enclosed), may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Ms. Anjali Gupta, 43 – C, Sukhbir Nagar, Karala, Delh, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



Sh. Rakesh Kumar , WZ – 13, Nimri Village, Shastri Nagar, DELHI

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right to Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 427 of Sh. Rakesh Kumar.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. F.14/77/RTI/2010/HP-II/2847 dated 29.04.2010,


427 dated 06.05.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Public

Prosecutor/Delhi, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above





Sh. Manish Kumar S/o Sh. Kewal Krishan, C – 6 / 342, Badan Street, Near Gole Park, Dhuri – 148024 (Punjab).

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 423 of Sh. Manish Kumar S/o Sh. Kewal Krishan.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 2871/DIC/SWD dated 20.04.2010, please enclosed

herewith the reply of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 423 dated

24.04.2010 contained 02 (Two) pages collected from the concerned Chief



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy to:- Asstt. Public Information Officer, Office of the Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-cum-PIO, South West District, Sector 19, Dwarka, New Delhi. Appellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024



Smt. Neeraj C/o Stayavir, H. No. 8 / 17, Village and Post Office Mehram Nagar, Near Palam Airport, New Delhi- 110037.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 422 of Smt. Neeraj C/o Stayavir.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 14/80/RTI/2010/HP-II/2682 dated 22.04.2010,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy to:- The Joint Secretary (Home), GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Deptt., 5th

Level, C Wing, Delhi Secretariat, I. P. Estate, New Delhi.




The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I / Public Information Officer, East District, Vishwas Nagar, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Omparakash N. Dube under the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please refer to the letter no. I.D./690/4409/Info. Cell/East Distt. Dated 21.04.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 1920/DOP dated 27.04.2010 in respect of Sh. Omparakash N. Dube under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, the required information pertains to the Police Department as no dossier of any case is maintained by the Prosecution Branch. Moreover the case has already been decided. Therefore, the same is transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls : As above.



Copy to: Sh. Omparakash N. Dube, r/o. IInd Floor Nallasopara Shopping Center, Dube Estate, Nallasopara East, Taluka Vasai, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra-401209





Sir,

Please enclosed herewith the partly reply i.e. question no. 1(e) of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 424 dated 23.03.2010 is as under:-

1(e) The remuneration / fee fixed of other Public Prosecutors are paid by the State Government. And this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above (B. S. KAIN)


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy to:- The SPIO/JOINT Secretary (Home), GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Department, 5th





Ms. Shagufta Parveen, D/o. Mohd. Israr, R/o-R-3A288, Mangal Bazar, Noori Masjid, Mohan Garden, Uttam Nagar, DELHI.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 420 of Ms. Shagufta Parveen.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 4002/(507/10/DIC/(DA-I)West dated 16.04.2010,



Prosecutor, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above



ppellate Authority- Director Directorate of Prosecution Government of NCT of Delhi R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court Delhi – 110054 Tel. No. 23929024



Sh. Dr. Jwala Prasad, F – 66, New Usmanpur, DELHI – 110053.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 421 of Dr. Jwala Prasad.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 50/RTI/PIO/2010/ID :0034 dated 23.04.2010,


421 dated 24.04.2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the concerned Addl.



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. R. N. Mishra, Advocate, RZ – 873, Street No. – 05, Sagarpur (Main), NEW DELHI – 110046.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 417 of Sh. R. N. Mishra.

Sir,

In reference the letter No. 787/PIO/Crime & Railway dated 07.04.2010,


417 dated 13.04.2010 contained 10 (Ten) pages collected from the concerned Chief



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Abhijeet Singh Chauhan, N – 537, Sector – 25, NOIDA.


419 of Sh. Abhijeet Singh Chauhan. Sir,


I.D No. 419 dated 21.04.2010 contained 08 (Eight) page collected from the

concerned Chief Prosecutors / Incharge, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Smt. Anubha Rastogi, B – 68, IInd Floor, Sarvodaya Enclave, NEW DELHI – 110017

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 416 of Smt. Anubha Rastogi.

Sir,

In reference the letter No.F.2(37)/03/Lit/Vol-II/DS2law/463-465 dated

07.04.2010 of the Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs, please

enclosed herewith the reply of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 416

dated 09.04.2010 contained 08 (Eight) pages collected from the concerned Chief



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. A. U. Khan, Advocate, Chamber No. 468, New Lawyer’s Chambers, Patiala House Courts, NEW DELHI – 110001.


418 of Sh. A. U. Khan. Sir,


I.D No. 418 dated 12.04..2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the Addl.



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above




April 22, 2010

To,


of Sh. A. U. Khan. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- As per section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005, the information cannot be

provided to a Lawyer on behalf of his client, as the power for seeking the

information under RTI Act 2005, cannot be delegated.


Link P.I.O.


To, Sh. Bhure Khan, S/o. Sh. Sanaulla Beig, C/o. C.T. Ward No. 5/3, Jail No. 1,

Central Jail, Tihar, DELHI – 110064

Sub: Supply of information in response to RTI Appeal Application Dated

15.04.2010. Sir, Please find enclosed herewith a self explanatory original Order No. 374/Appeal/DOP/2010 dated 20.04.2010, passed by the First Appellate Authority / Director of Prosecution, in the RTI Appeal, as mentioned above. The pointwise / parawise reply has been given by the Appellate Authority, itself, in the enclosed Original Order.

This is for your information. Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above

(PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER) DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION

DELHI



Sh. Rama Swarup Sabherwal, D – 83, Defence Colony, NEW DELHI – 110024.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 415 of Sh. Rama Swarup Sabherwal.

Sir,

In reference the letter No.F.14/63/RTI/2010/HP-II/2087 dated 31.03.2010 of

the Home Department, please enclosed herewith the reply of your application under

RTI Act vide I.D No. 415 dated 05.04..2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from

the Chief Prosecutor / Incharge, Patiala House Courts, Directorate of Prosecution,


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Naveen Soni, B 2 / 103, Safdarganj Enclave, NEW DELHI - 110029.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 412 of Sh. Naveen Soni.

Sir,



Prosecutor / Incharge, Karkardooma Courts, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Amarjeet Singh Bajaj, C – 49, Chhatarpur Enclave, Phase II, NEW DELHI - 110074.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 413 of Sh. Amarjeet Singh Bajaj.

Sir,


I.D No. 413 dated 06.04..2010 contained 11 (Eleven) pages collected from the DOP



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Amar Kohli, N – 22, Panchsheel Park, NEW DELHI - 110017.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 407 of Sh. Amar Kohli.

Sir,


I.D No. 407 dated 22.03..2010 contained 10 (Ten) pages collected from the Chief

Prosecutor / Incharge, Patiala House Courts, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Kumar, D – 620, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi – 110032.


under pointwise:-

4. The Total filled post of Assistant Public Prosecutor is 70.

5. The total vacant post of Assistant Public Prosecutor is 50.

Submitted please.

P.I.O.



Sh. Ch. Amit Kumar, D – 620, Karkardooma Courts DELHI - 110032.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 409 of Sh. Ch. Amit Kumar.

Sir,


I.D No. 409 dated 30.03..2010 contained 01 (One) page collected from the



Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






Sh. Jitendra Sharma, 174/1, Krishna Bhawan, Hari Nagar Ashram, Mathura Road, NEW DELHI - 14.

SUB: Reply of RTI Application under Right Information Act’2005 vide I.D no. 408 of Sh. Jitendra Sharma.

Sir,



Prosecutor / Incharge, Patiala House Court, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of


Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I / Public Information Officer, Outer District, Road No. 43, Pushpanjali, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/o. Sh. Rambir under

the Right to Information Act 2005”.

Sir, Please refer to the letter no. 29/RTI/PIO/2010/ID-0021 dated 01.04.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 1547/DOP dated 06.04.2010 in respect of Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/o. Sh. Rambir under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, the required information pertains to the Police Department as intimated. Therefore, the same is transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls: As above.



Copy to: Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/o. Sh. Rambir, H. No. 125, Pipal Wala Pana, Village Sultanpur Dabas, PO Puth Khurd, Delhi – 110039, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.






Sir,






Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above






The Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police-I / Public Information Officer, New Delhi District, NEW DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Neeraj Chawla under the Right to


Sir, Please refer to your office letter no. 593/DIC/NDD dated 23.03.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 1507/DOP dated 03.04.2010 in respect of Sh. Neeraj Chawla under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, the sanctions are not granted by the Prosecution Department as intimated by DOP branch. Therefore, the same is return back / transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action and the requisite information may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Encls: As above.



Copy to: Sh. Neeraj Chawla, H. No. 1702/1, Link Road, Near Cheema Chowk, Ludhiana – 141003, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.


DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION; GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054.


The Public Information Officer, Office of the District Judge-III & I/C Addl. Sessions Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Ujjal Das Gupta under Right to


Sir, Please refer to your office letter no. 64/Admn./RTI/West/THC/2010 dated 22.03.2010 the same is received in this office vide Diary No. 1389/DOP dated 27.03.2010 in respect of Sh. Ujjal Das Gupta under Right to Information Act, 2005. In this context, it is mention here that the information sought pertains to your office as intimated DOP branch. Therefore, the same is return back / transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Ujjal Das Gupta, Jail No. – 1, Ward No. – 1, Tihar Jail, Hari Nagar, New Delhi - 110064, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.






Sir,

Please enclosed herewith the partly reply i.e. question no. 1(a), 1(f) and 1(g) of your application under RTI Act vide I.D No. 405 dated 23.03.2010, contained 02 (Two) pages collected from the concerned branch, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and this disposes off the application submitted by you.

Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy to:- The Deputy Secretary (Home) / PIO, GNCT of Delhi, Home (Police-II) Department, 5th








Sir,






Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above




RTI MATTER




Sh. Amit Gupta, B – 6/175, Sector – 08, Rohini, DELHI – 85.



Yours faithfully



RTI MATTER




Sh. L. N. Aggarwal, Ex. Director (Govt. of India), F – 94, Ram Path, Shyam Nagar, JAIPUR – 302019.



Yours faithfully








Madam,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above


GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy forwarded to the Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police / PIO, West District, Ist Floor, P.S. Rajouri Gar4den, Delhi for information in reference to your letter no. 1861/(1344/09/DIC/(DA-III)West dated 22.02.2010. Appellate Authority : Director, Directorate of Prosecution, Government of NCT of Delhi, R. No. 159, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi – 110054, Tel. No. 23929024.






Madam,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








.Madam,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above








Madam,





Yours faithfully,

Encl: As above



March 25, 2010

To,


of Ms. Surbhi Chopra. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- In reference to letter no. 1861/(1344/09/DIC/(DA-III)West dated 22.02.2010.






(B. S. KAIN)


March 25, 2010

To,








(B. S. KAIN)


March 25, 2010

To,




Directorate pointwise reply is as under:-

4. One case was charge sheeted and Copy is attached.

5. Nil

6. Nil

3. Nil

Only one case is pending in Patiala House Courts with FIR No. 446/93 P.S. S. N.

Puri u/s 147, 148, 149, 395, 436 & 307 IPC S Vs Dhani Ram etc pending in the

Court of Sh. Chender Gupta, ASJ. The next date of hearing is 19.04.2010 for final

arguments of the case.

(B. S. KAIN)







Sub. :Transfer of Application of Ms. Hansa Bhadana the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 1308/DOP dated 23.03.2010 in respect of Ms. Hansa Bhadana under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is being transferred to your office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your Office may be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information :- Ms. Hansa Bhadana, 1794, Prasadi Gali, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi-110003, with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.



F.No. ID No. 404/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, The Addl. Dy. Commissioner of Police / PIO, Establishment,

M.S.O. Building, IInd Floor, I. P. Estate NEW DELHI.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Sumit Ranjan, under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application vide letter no. 574/PIO/CRIME, dated 12.03.2010 received in this office vide I.D. No. 404 dated 20.03.2010 in respect of Sh. Sumit Ranjan, Advocate, Chamber No. D-319, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same i.e. question no. 5b as intimated by Addl.PP, Dte. of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi is being transferred to your good office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your office may kindly be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Sumit Ranjan, Advocate, Chamber No. D-319, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

March 20, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 404 of Sh. Sumit

Ranjan. Sir, The pointwise reply of the above RTI is as under:-

5. No policy, it’s administrative matter. 6. There is no fixed term but generally Police Department transfers the Naib

Courts after every 3 to 5 years. 7. The reply of this question can be obtained from all CP/Incharge. 8. No complaint is pending. Whenever any complaint is received the same

be sent to the DCP concerned. 5a The reply of this question can be obtained from all CP/Incharge 5b. The transfers order and cancellation order have been made by the Police

Department. Requisite information may be obtained from Police Department.

(B. S. KAIN)


RTI MATTER





Pitam Pura, Near Kohat Metro Station, Floor Kohat Enclave,

DELHI - 110075 SUB:- Appeal under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Sir,

I am in receipt of your Appeal 08.03.2010. In this connection, you are advised to appear in person before the undersigned at 03:30 P.M. on 17.03.2010, to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this regard.

Yours faithfully



March 12, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 395 of Sh. Jwala

Prasad. Sir, The reply of the above RTI is as under:- The information seeks by Sh. Jwala Prasad resident of F – 66, New Usmanpur,

Delhi-53, does not pertain to this Directorate. This pertains to Police Department.

(B. S. KAIN)





Public Information Officer, New Delhi District, Patiala House Court. New Delhi.

Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Rajpal Singh, under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 1084/DOP dated 11.03.2010 in respect of Sh. Raj Pal Singh, S/o. Sh. Phool Singh, under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same is concerned to your office as intimated by Addl.PP, Dte. of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi is being transferred to your good office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your office may kindly be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Raj Pal Singh, S/o. Sh. Phool Singh, Ward No. 2, Barrack No. 3B, Central Jail No. 1, Tihar, Delhi-64 with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

RTI MATTER



No. /Appeal 27/DOP/2009 Date To,

Sh. Mukul Kumar, A-02, Silver Oak Apartment, 109, I. P. Ext. I, DELHI - 110092


With reference to Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2010/000198/6937 and Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2010/000198, you are advised to appear in person before the undersigned at 03:00 P.M. on 12.03.2010, to explain your grievance, before the finalization of appeal filed by you, in this regard.

Yours faithfully




R. NO. 160A; TIS HAZARI COURT COMPLEX; DELHI- 110054. F. I.D. No. 399/RTI/DOP/10/ Dated:

Kindly find enclosed herewith RTI applications vide I.D. No.

399/RTI/DOP/10 filed by Ms. Surbhi Chopra, B – 68, IInd Floor, Sarvodaya

Enclave, New Delhi - 110017.


(B. S. Kain) LINK PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER


Copy forwarded to:

9. PP Delhi 10. CP/Inchage, PHC 11. CP/Inchage, Karkardooma 12. CP/Incharge, Dwarka 13. CP/Incharge, Rohini 14. CP/Incharge (North) 15. CP/Incharge (West) 16. CP/Incharge (Central)



F.No. ID No. 390/RTI/DOP/2010/ Dated: To, The Addl. Commissioner of Police -1st

North District, / PIO,

Near Police Station, Civil Lines,

DELHI. Sub. :Transfer of Application of Sh. Yash Pal Bhatia, under the Right to


Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the copy of the application received in the office vide Diary No. 910/DOP dated 25.02.2010 in respect of Sh. Yash Pal Bhatia, 9/2185, Street No. 8, Kailash Nagar, Delhi-31 under Right to Information Act, 2005 seeking information concerning to your office. Therefore, the same i.e. question no. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 as intimated by Addl.PP, Dte. of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi is being transferred to your good office under sub-section (3) of Section 6 of RTI Act, 2005 for necessary action. The requisite information pertaining to your office may kindly be sent to the applicant directly within stipulated time under RTI Act, 2005. In case, it does not fall under your jurisdiction, it may please be further transferred to the public authority to which the subject matter is closely connected directly with the intimation to the application. Thanking you,



GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Copy for information:- Sh. Yash Pal Bhatia, 9/2185, Street No. 08, Kailash Nagar, Delhi-31 with the request to contact the above PIO for further correspondence.

March 09, 2010

To,

The Public Information Officer, Directorate of Prosecution, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. SUB:- Supply of Information under the RTI Act vide I.D. No. 390 of Sh. Yash Pal

Bhatia. Sir, The point-wise reply of the above RTI is as under:-

4. In reply of the question no. 1 it is stated that before registration of the case and filing of the charge sheet the Assistant Public Prosecutor can not appear. It is mentioned here that after registration of the case on the basis of complaint u/s 156(3) titled as Girdhari Lal v/s Yash Pal Bhatia the concerned case had given the direction to the Police to register a case and in compliance of which FIR No. 166/99 was registered in P.S. Bada Hindu Rao.

5. As above

6. In response of query no. 3 it is stated that as soon as any criminal case is

register and charge sheet is filed in pursuance of the FIR. It is statutory duly of the concerned APP to appear in the said case on behalf of state even at the investigation stage also for disposing of miscellaneous application relating to the case.

10. In response of query no. 9 it is stated that the court will take the time and

specific date can not be ascertain for it. 10. The the APP posted in the court concerned is doing his work sincerely and

honestly.


Link P.I.O.