office order tribunal s orders coram : a.r ...farad continuation sheet in the maharashtra...

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD

M.A. 156/2019 IN O.A. 246/2019 (The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. Shriniwas Sureshrao Kulkarni & Ors.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : A.R. CHADHA, MEMBER (A). (This matter is placed before the Single Bench due to non-availability of Division Bench.)

DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned Presenting

Officer for the applicants in the present misc.

application / respondents in O.A. and Shri S.B.

Solanke, learned Advocate for the respondents in the

present misc. application / applicants in O.A.

2. O.A. no. 246/2019 has been filed by the

applicants for the following interim reliefs :-

“(C) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Original Application, the respondent no. 2 may kindly be directed to issue an orders in favour of the applicants thereby appointing them as Law Instructors with the Police Training Centre, Babhalgaon, Tal & Dist. Latur, forthwith. (D) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Original Application, the respondent no. 2 may kindly be directed to make an arrangement to accommodate the applicants on the posts of Law Instructors with the Police Training Centre, Babhalgaon, Tal. & District Latur on clock hour basis and for that purpose issue necessary orders.”

3. The Tribunal granted interim relief as per prayer

clause (C) of the original application without going into

the merit of the matter vide order dtd. 11.3.2019.

//2// M.A. 156/2019 IN O.A. 246/2019

4. The respondents in the original applicant have

now filed Misc. Application no. 156/2019 for vacating

the interim relief granted by the Tribunal in favour of

the applicants vide order dtd. 11.3.2019.

5. In the O.A. no. 246/2019 the following

submissions were made by the applicants :-

(A) Applicant nos. 1 & 2 have worked for

eleven years from 2007 and Applicant nos. 3 & 4

have worked for four years with the respondents.

(B) The claims of the present applicants

were not considered. Except the present

Applications all other Law Instructions were

continued, the names of the applicants were not

considered and enlisted in the list of Law

Instructors published by the Respondent no. 2.

(C) The persons / candidates selected are

junior and have less experience.

(D) All the Law Officers working have

given representation that they may be given

relaxation from appearing in the interview.

(E) It is well settled law that one ad-hoc

employee cannot be replaced by another ad-hoc

employee.

//3// M.A. 156/2019 IN O.A. 246/2019

6. The brief submissions of the applicants in the

misc. application / respondents in the O.A. are as

follows :-

(A) The applicants were appointed as Law

Instructions as per the G.R. dtd. 15.9.2006 for

the period of 11 months on contractual basis,

which was renewable for another two terms.

(B) The respondents issued fresh

advertisement on 17.11.2017 in response of

which total 266 applications were received. A

total of 155 candidates appeared in the interview.

(C) The applicants appeared in the interview

but they have failed in the interview.

7. In fact the applicants have not brought out the

corrects facts before the Tribunal in Original

Application that they were not considered in the

interview.

8. In reply to the misc. application the applicants in

the O.A. have now admitted that they were considered

and deliberately given less marks so that their services

can be discontinued.

9. In reply to the misc. application the applicants in

the O.A. have submitted that there are 12 sanctioned

posts at Babhalgaon Police Training Centre, Tal. &

District Latur and out of 10 selected candidates one

//4// M.A. 156/2019 IN O.A. 246/2019

candidate has not joined. Therefore as on today there

are total of three vacant posts of Law Instructors. In

reply to misc. application the applicants in O.A.

submitted that the applicant no. 1 is at sr. no. 55 and

applicant no. 2 is at sr. no. 64.

10. In view of above discussion, the interim relief

granted by the Tribunal vide order dtd. 11.3.2019 in

O.A. is hereby vacated. The respondents are liberty

filled up three vacant posts as per merit.

11. Accordingly, the Misc. Application no. 156/2019

is hereby allowed and disposed of without any order as

to costs.

MEMBER (A)

ARJ ORAL ORDER 15.04.2019.



O.A. No. 246/2019 (The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. Shriniwas Sureshrao Kulkarni & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.B. Solanke, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondents.

2. At the request of learned Presenting Officer for

the respondents, S.O. to 17.06.2019 for filing affidavit

in reply.

MEMBER (A) ARJ ORAL ORDER 15.04.2019.



ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.255/2019 (Subhash Devrao Thale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15-04-2019 ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri P.B.Salunke learned Advocate holding

for Shri V.G.Salgare learned Advocate for the applicant

and Shri V.R.Bhumkar learned Presenting Officer for

the respondents.

2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on

17-06-2019.

3. Tribunal may take the case for final disposal at

once and separate notice for final disposal shall not be

issued.

4. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on

respondent/s intimation/notice of date of hearing duly

authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper

book of the case. Respondents are put to notice that

the case would be taken up for final disposal at the

stage of admission hearing.

5. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11

of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal

(Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as

limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.

6. The service may be done by hand delivery,

speed post, courier and acknowledgment be

=2= O.A.No.255/2019

obtained and produced along with affidavit of

compliance in the Registry before due date. Applicant

is directed to file affidavit of compliance and notice.

7. If notice is not collected within 7 days or proof of

service is not produced before 3 days of the next date,

case shall automatically stand dismissed without

further reference to the Tribunal.

8. S.O. to 17-06-2019.

9. Steno copy and hamdast allowed for the use of

both the sides.

MEMBER (A) YUK ORAL ORDERS 15-04-2019



ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.849/2018 (Dr. Vinod Kakade & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri S.G.Chapalgaonkar learned Advocate

for the applicants and Shri D.R.Patil learned


2. Heard both sides at length.

3. Interim relief in terms of prayer clause (D) is

hereby granted which is as under:

"(D) Pending hearing and final disposal of Original Application, in the event if exercise of promotions is undertaken by respondents, in that contingency claim of applicants for post of District Health Officer shall be considered provisionally without prejudice to Educational Qualification in form of DPH obtained by them."

4. Result of the Departmental Promotion Committee

would be kept in a sealed cover and will be subject to

outcome of this O.A.

5. O.A. be placed for final hearing on 16-07-2019. MEMBER (A) YUK ORAL ORDERS 15-04-2019



ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.267/2019 (Kashinath Ghumare V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri Kakasaheb B. Jadhav learned

Advocate for the applicant and Shri D.R.Patil learned


2. Respondents are directed to consider the

representations of the applicant dated 26-10-2016, 22-

08-2017 and 10-11-2017 and take decision thereon

expeditiously and in any case within 3 months from

the date of this order, as per rules on merit.

3. O.A. stands disposed of without any order as to

costs.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.334/2019 (Goroba Aaradwad & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15-04-2019

ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri Baliram B. Shinde learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri S.K.Shirse learned


2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on

19-06-2019.



issued.











6. The service may be done by hand delivery,

speed post, courier and acknowledgment be

=2= O.A.No.334/2019

obtained and produced along with affidavit of

compliance in the Registry before due date. Applicant

is directed to file affidavit of compliance and notice.





8. S.O. to 19-06-2019.


both the sides.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION ST. NO.667/2019 (Dastagir Shirure V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri Arun S. Shejwal learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri V.R.Bhumkar learned


2. In view of the office objection, the matter to be

heard by the regular bench.

3. S.O. to 24-04-2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.754/2019 WITH CAVEAT NO.24/2019 (Prashant Kachhawa V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri K.G.Salunke learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri M.P.Gude learned Presenting

Officer for the respondents.

2. At the request of learned Presenting Officer, S.O.

to 24-04-2019.

3. Parties are at liberty to circulate the case as and

when required.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.986/2018 (Archana Patil V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri Vinod Patil learned Advocate for the

applicant is absent. Shri D.R.Patil learned Presenting

Officer for the respondents is present.

Shri H.P.Randhir learned Advocate for

respondent no.4 is absent.

2. Learned P.O. submits that during the course of

the day he will file affidavit in reply on behalf of the

respondent nos.2 and 3. He also undertakes to serve

copy of the reply on the other side.

3. He states that reply of respondent no.1 is not

necessary.

4. S.O. to 20-06-2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.36/2019 (Dr. Sulbha Mulay V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri P.B.Salunke learned Advocate holding

for Shri V.G.Salgare learned Advocate for the

applicant, Shri D.R.Patil learned Presenting Officer for

the respondents and Smt. Supriya Bhilegaonkar

learned Advocate holding for Shri M.B.Bharaswadkar

learned Advocate for respondent no.5.

2. Learned P.O. submits that copy of the record is

now available and he files Xerox copy of the same on

record.

3. S.O. to 29-04-2019.




M.A.NO.189/2019 IN O.A.NO.966/2018 (Suman Kamble V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Heard Shri Rajendra Lone learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. M.S.Patni learned Presenting


2. At the request of learned Advocate for the

applicant S.O. to 16-04-2019.




O.A.NO.825/2016, 864/2016, 865/2016, 866/2016 & 867/2016 (Prakash Gaikwad & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



Shri Vijay B. Jogdand Patil learned Advocate for

the applicants is absent. Shri V.R.Bhumkar learned

Presenting Officer for the respondents is present.

2. Since none is present for the applicants,

S.O. to 16-04-2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 325 OF 2019 (Shri Bapusaheb B. Chavre V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A). (This matter is placed before the Single

Bench due to non-availability of Division Bench.)

DATE : 15.04.2019. ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Farooqui Kamaluddin Nuruddin,

learned Advocate holding for Shri N.L. Jadhav, learned

Advocate for the applicant and Shri S.K. Shirse,

learned Presenting Officer for respondents.

2. Issue notices to the respondents, returnable on

27.06.2019.



issued.

4. Applicants are authorized and directed to serve

on respondent/s intimation/notice of date of hearing

duly authenticated by Registry, along with complete

paper book of the case. Respondents are put to notice

that the case would be taken up for final disposal at

the stage of admission hearing.





//2// O.A. No. 325/2019

6. The service may be done by hand delivery, speed

post, courier and acknowledgment be obtained

and produced along with affidavit of compliance in

the Registry before due date. Applicants are directed

to file affidavit of compliance and notice.





8. S.O. to 27.06.2019.


both the sides.

MEMBER (A) kpb ORAL ORDER 15.04.2019 arc.



ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2019 (Shri Avinash D. Nikam V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri V.R. Dhorde, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned

Presenting Officer for respondents.


26.06.2019.



issued.











//2// O.A. No. 335/2019










8. The respondents are directed, in the meantime, one post be kept vacant/reserved for the applicant. 9. S.O. to 26.06.2019.


both the sides.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 336 OF 2019 (Shri Anil S. Navale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




DATE : 15.04.2019. ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri J.B. Choudhary, learned Advocate

holding for Shri A.R. Tapse, learned Advocate for the




27.06.2019.



issued.











//2// O.A. No. 336/2019










8. S.O. to 27.06.2019.


both the sides.


FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 288 OF 2019 (Dr. Ramdas S. Gutte V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




DATE : 15.04.2019. ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri J.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri S.K. Shirse, learned Presenting

Officer for respondents.


28.06.2019.



issued.











//2// O.A. No. 288/2019










8. S.O. to 28.06.2019.


both the sides.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION ST. NO. 643 OF 2019 (Dr. Kulbhushan M. Kandarkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri J.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting



28.06.2019.



issued.











//2// O.A. St. 643/2019










8. S.O. to 28.06.2019.


both the sides.




M.A. No. 193/2019 IN O.A. St. No. 812/2019 (Shri Nangesh N. Unche & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) (This matter is placed before the Single


DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri D.R. Irale Patil, learned Advocate for

the applicants and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting


2. This is an application preferred by the applicants

seeking leave to sue jointly.

3. For the reasons stated in the application, and

since the cause and the prayers are identical and since

the applicants have prayed for same relief, and to avoid

the multiplicity, leave to sue jointly granted, subject to

payment of court fee stamps, if not paid.

4. Accompanying O.A. be registered and numbered,

after removal of office objections, if any. The present

M.A. stands disposed of accordingly without any order

as to costs.

MEMBER (A) kpb ORAL ORDERS 15.04.2019 arc.



ORIGINAL APPLICATION ST. NO. 812 OF 2019 (Shri Nangesh N. Unche V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)




DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri D.R. Irale Patil, learned Advocate for




29.04.2019.



issued.











//2// O.A. St. 812/2019










8. Without filing any detailed affidavit in reply, in the meantime, the respondents are directed to decide the representation of the applicants in each of the cases, copies of which are placed on record in each of the cases, and shall file the report regarding taking decision on the next date. 9. S.O. to 29.04.2019.


both the sides.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 762 OF 2018 (Shri Sahebrao D. Deshmukh & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Shri M.C. Swami, learned Advocate for the

applicants (Absent). Shri S.K. Shirse, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondents, present.

2. Shri Sahebrao D. Deshmukh, party in person

appeared today in the Court and submits that he

wants to change the Advocate, as the earlier learned

Advocate is prolonging the matter unnecessarily.

3. Permission granted.

4. S.O. to 06.06.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 304 OF 2019 (Shri Pandharinath M. Ahire V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Harish Bali, learned Advocate for the



2. Learned Advocate for the applicant seeks time to

place on record a copy of the relevant G.R. regarding

the issue involved in the present O.A.

3. S.O. to 16.04.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 305 OF 2019 (Shri Gokul S. Ingle V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Harish Bali, learned Advocate for the



2. Learned Advocate for the applicant seeks time to

place on record a copy of the relevant G.R. regarding

the issue involved in the present O.A.

3. S.O. to 16.04.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2018 (Shri Shashank B. Kamble V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri G.J. Kore, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting

Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Shri Mahesh

Kochar, learned Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 to 5,

absent.

2. S.O. to 20.06.2019 for filing affidavit in reply of

respondent Nos. 3 to 5, as a last chance.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 470 OF 2018 (Smt. Mahadabai G. Dhulekar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Shri V.D. Kadam, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent). Shri S.K. Shirse, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3,

present. None present for respondent Nos. 4 & 5.

2. As none present for the applicant, S.O. to

21.06.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 872 OF 2018 (Shri Arun M. Gir V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Shri A.G. Ambetkar, learned Advocate for the

applicant (Absent). Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief

Presenting Officer for the respondents, present.

2. As none present for the applicant, the present

matter is removed from the board and it be kept for

hearing whenever Division Bench is available.




C.P. No. 56/2018 in O.A. No. 535/2017 (Dr. Shrinivas R. Jadhav V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Shamsunder B. Patil, learned

Advocate for the applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar,

learned Presenting Officer for the respondents.

2. Learned Presenting Officer has placed on record

a copy of communication dated 12.04.2019 along with

accompanying documents and submits that the

prayers made by the applicant have been satisfied.

Copy of the said communication is taken on record

and marked as document-‘X’ collectively for the

purposes of identification.

3. Learned Advocate for the applicant has

submitted that in view of the communication filed by

the learned Presenting Officer, the present matter may

be disposed of.

4. In view of the submissions made by both the

parties, C.P. No. 56/2018 stands disposed of with no

order as to costs.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2019 (Dr. Rekha G. Gaikwad V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Shamsunder B. Patil, learned

Advocate for the applicant and Smt. Priya R.

Bharaswadkar, learned Presenting Officer for

respondent nos. 1 & 2. None appears for respondent

no. 3.

2. Learned Presenting Officer seeks time to file

affidavit in reply. Time granted. It is made clear that

learned Presenting Officer shall file affidavit in reply

within next two weeks, if possible, and serve copy

thereof upon the learned Advocate for the applicant.

3. Matter to come up for filing rejoinder, if any, and

also for hearing on 12.6.2019.

MEMBER (A)




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 299 OF 2019 (Shri Rahul T. Pol & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Ms. Preeti Wankhade, learned Advocate for

the applicants and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting



to 17.6.2019 for filing affidavit in reply of the

respondents.

MEMBER (A)




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2019 (Shri Sudhakar R. Tak V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019. ORAL ORDER :

Heard Shri K.B. Jadhav, learned Advocate for the


Presenting Officer for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Shri

B.G. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for respondent no.

5 (absent).

2. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that

the respondents have closed the departmental enquiry

pending against the applicant. He also files on record

copies of communication dtd. 26.3.2019 &

14/20.3.2019 issued by the concerned respondents in

that regard and the said communications are taken on

record and marked as document ‘X’ collectively for the

purpose of identification.

3. In the circumstances, with the consent of both

the sides, the present Original Application is disposed

of as per prayer clause (B) of the O.A., which reads as

under :-

“(B) To direct the respondent no. 2 to consider the

case of the applicant for promotion on the post of

Naib Tahsildar.”

::-2-:: O.A. NO. 96 OF 2019

4. The concerned respondents are hereby directed

to consider the case of the present for promotion to the

post of Naib Tahsildar as and when vacancy arises.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

MEMBER (A)




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 339 OF 2019 (Dr. Kishor S. Ubale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri A.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar,


2. Registrar of this order has placed office note dtd.

11.4.2019, which reads as under :-

“1. Applicant Dr. Kishor S. Ubale initially filed O.A. bearing no. 296/2018 before the principal seat of this Tribunal at Mumbai.

2. By the order dtd. 16.3.2019 in the M.A. no. 134/2019 in O.A. no. 296/2018 the principal seat has rejected the prayer of the applicant for leave to file said O.A. before the principal seat at Mumbai with a direction that papers of O.A. be returned to the applicant, if he wants to present the same at Aurangabad Bench.

3. In view of above order, the applicant presented the O.A. at this Bench on 29.3.2019 & it is numbered as O.A. No. 339/2019.

4. In view of above O.A. is being placed before the Hon’ble Tribunal for hearing on 15.4.2019.”

3. In the circumstances, issue notice to

respondents, returnable on 17.6.2019.

::-2-:: O.A. NO. 339 OF 2019



issued.














the Registry before due date. Applicant is directed to

file affidavit of compliance and notice.





9. S.O. to 17.6.2019.

10. Steno copy and Hamdast is allowed to both parties.

MEMBER (A)




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 340 OF 2019 (Dr. Kishor S. Ubale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri A.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar,


2. Registrar of this Bench has placed office note

dtd. 11.4.2019, which reads as under :-

“1. Applicant Dr. Kishor S. Ubale initially filed O.A. bearing no. 297/2018 before the principal seat of this Tribunal at Mumbai.

2. By the order dtd. 16.3.2019 in the M.A. no. 135/2019 in O.A. no. 297/2018 the principal seat has rejected the prayer of the applicant for leave to file said O.A. before the principal seat at Mumbai with a direction that papers of O.A. be returned to the applicant, if he wants to present the same at Aurangabad Bench.

3. In view of above order, the applicant presented the O.A. at this Bench on 29.3.2019 & it is numbered as O.A. No. 340/2019.

4. In view of above O.A. is being placed before the Hon’ble Tribunal for hearing on 15.4.2019.”

3. In the circumstances, issue notice to

respondents, returnable on 17.6.2019.

::-2-:: O.A. NO. 340 OF 2019



issued.




















9. S.O. to 17.6.2019.

10. Steno copy and Hamdast is allowed to both parties.

MEMBER (A)




M.A. 179/2019 IN O.A. ST. NO. 774 OF 2019 (Shantaram M. Sonwane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.D. Dhongde, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned


2. Present misc. application has been filed by the

applicant for condonation of six months delay caused

in filing accompanying O.A.

3. For the reasons stated in the present misc.

application it is allowed and disposed of without any

order as to costs and the delay of six months caused in

filing accompanying O.A. is hereby condoned.

4. Accordingly, office to register the accompanying

O.A. on due scrutiny.

MEMBER (A)




O.A. ST. NO. 774 OF 2019 (Shantaram M. Sonwane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.D. Dhongde, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned


2. Issue notice to respondents, returnable on

21.6.2019.



issued.











::-2-:: O.A. ST. NO. 774 OF 2019










8. S.O. to 21.6.2019.

10. Steno copy and Hamdast is allowed to both

parties.

MEMBER (A)




M.A. 172/2019 IN O.A. 152 OF 2007 (Vijaykumar B. Rathi V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri M.M. Bhokarikar, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned


2. Present misc. application has been filed by the

applicant for restoration of O.A. no. 152/2007 to its

original file, which has been dismissed in default by

the Tribunal vide order dtd. 2.4.2019.

3. For the reasons stated in the present misc.

application it is allowed and disposed of without any

order as to costs and O.A. no. 152/2007 is hereby

restored to its original file.

4. O.A. no. 152/2007 to come up for final before the

Division Bench as and when it is available, with liberty

to learned Advocate for the applicant to ask for

circulation.

MEMBER (A)




O.A. NO. 50 OF 2015 (Rajesndra B. Patil V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri K.G. Salunke, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting


2. Learned P.O. submits that pursuant to the order

of the Tribunal dtd. 1.12.2018 she has received copies

of D.P.C. meetings and the same would be filed within

a period of one week and copy thereof would be

supplied to the learned Advocate for the applicant.

3. In the circumstances, S.O. to 20.6.2019 for

hearing on the above line.

MEMBER (A)




O.A. NO. 713 OF 2017 (Venkat D. Mundhe V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri K.G. Salunke, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting


2. Learned P.O. submits that there is no necessity

to file additional documents in the present matter. In

the circumstances, the present case be placed for final

hearing before the Division Bench on 20.6.2019.

MEMBER (A)




O.A. NO. 694 OF 2013 (Bashir Khan Daulat Khan Patel V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Smt. Vidya Taksal, learned Advocate

holding for Shri A.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting


2. At the request of learned P.O., S.O. to 18.6.2019

for filing affidavit in reply of the concerned respondents

to the amended O.A.

MEMBER (A)




O.A. NO. 583 OF 2014 (Bhausaheb B. Gaikwad V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri R.D. Khadap, learned Advocate

holding for Shri S.S. Thombre, learned Advocate for

the applicant, Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting

Officer for respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Shri A.C.

Deshpande, learned Advocate for respondent nos. 5 &

6.

2. With consent of both the sides, S.O. to 21.6.2019

for final hearing before the Division Bench.

MEMBER (A)




M.A. 394/2018 IN O.A. NO. 577/2017 (Ramesh G. Chaudhari V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



DATE : 15.04.2019.

ORAL ORDER : None appears for the applicant. Smt. M.S. Patni,

learned Presenting Officer for respondent nos. 1 & 2

and Shri A.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

respondent no. 3, are present.

2. At the request of learned P.O., S.O. to 7.6.2019

for filing reply of res. no. 2.

MEMBER (A)




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 517 OF 2017 (Shri Anup S. Kulkarni V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) [The present case is placed before the

Single Bench due to non-availability of Division Bench].


Heard Shri S.B. Bhosale, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Mrs. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned



applicant, S.O. to 25.06.2019.

MEMBER (A) ORAL ORDERS 15.04.2019-HDD



ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 925 OF 2018 (Shri Kisan Dasu Pawar & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) [The present case is placed before the Single Bench due to non-availability of Division Bench].


Heard Shri A.C. Deshpande, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Sanjivani Deshmukh-Ghate,


2. Learned Presenting Officer has filed affidavit in

reply on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and the same

is taken on record and the copy thereof has been

served on the learned Advocate for the applicant.

3. S.O. to 26.06.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 960 OF 2018 (Shri Sunil B. Gaikwad V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Smt. Vidhay Taksal, learned Advocate for







3. S.O. to 26.06.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 958 OF 2018 (Shri Ramprasad S. Lahoti V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri H.A. Joshi, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting


2. Learned Presenting Officer submits that there is

no necessity for filing affidavit in reply to the amended

O.A. and submits that the present case be placed

before the Division Bench for final hearing.

3. In the circumstances, the present case is

admitted. The learned presenting Officer waives

service of notice on behalf of the respondents for

admission.

4. The present case be placed before the Division

Bench for final hearing on 13.06.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2019 (Shri Ramraje G. Pawar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri K.G. Salunke, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Mrs. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. None

appears for respondent No. 3 though duly served.


reply on behalf of respondent No. 2 and the same is

taken on record and the copy thereof has been served

on the learned Advocate for the applicant.

3. In the circumstances, S.O. to 24.6.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2019 (Shri Sharad B. Tote V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri K.G. Salunke, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Mrs. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. None

appears for respondent No. 3 though duly served.


reply on behalf of respondent No. 2 and the same is

taken on record and the copy thereof has been served

on the learned Advocate for the applicant.





ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 179 OF 2019 (Dr. Suryakant D. Sonkhedkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri J.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for




to 27.6.2019 for filing affidavit in reply.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 180 OF 2019 (Dr. Padmaja W/o Ajay SAraf V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri J.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for








ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 248 OF 2019 (Shri Vikram Bansi Mate & Anr. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri V.G. Pingle, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 77 OF 2017 (Shri Rajesh B. Yawalkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Kalyan Patil, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri S.K. Shirse, learned Presenting



reply on behalf of added respondent Nos. 3 & 4 and the

same is taken on record and the copy thereof has been



applicant, S.O. to 27.6.2019 for filing affidavit in reply.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 815 OF 2018 (Shri Prakash G. Gadhe V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri N.R. Thorat, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Mrs. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned


2. At the request and by consent of both the parties,

the present Original Application has been taken up for

final disposal.


the purpose of filing of the present Original Application

of the applicant has been served. He, therefore, seeks

permission of this Tribunal to withdraw the present

Original Application.

4. Permission granted. Withdrawal is allowed.

Accordingly, the present Original Application stands

disposed of as withdrawn without any order as to

costs.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 615 OF 2018 (Desai Timma Gaikwad V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Smt. Rebekah Daniel, learned Advocate

holding for Shri S.B. Talekar, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Mrs. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned










ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 810 OF 2017 (Shaligram M. Sonawane V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Smt. Vidya Taksal, learned Advocate

holding for Shri S.D. Dhongde, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Sanjivani Deshmuk-Ghate,



applicant, S.O. to 27.6.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 824 OF 2017 (Shri. Jeevan B. Sutar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri V.B. Wagh, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Smt. Sanjivani Deshmuukh-Ghate,



the present OA may be kept before the Division Bench

for final hearing.

3. In the circumstances, the present OA is

admitted.

4. Learned Presenting Officer waives service of

notice on behalf of the respondents for admission.

5. To be heard in due course of time. Learned

Advocate for the applicant is at liberty to circulate the

present OA as and when exigency arises.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2018 (Shri Prashant P. Vaidya V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri S.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay Deshpande, learned Advocate for



2. It transpires from the proceedings that on

05.02.2019 the learned Advocate for the applicant had

sought leave of this Tribunal to delete the respondent

Nos. 3 to 5 from the array of the present O.A. and

accordingly leave was granted for the same. However,

till today the learned Advocate for the applicant has

not taken any steps to delete the respondent Nos. 3 to

5. In the meantime, necessary steps would be

completed.


to 19.06.2019 for filing affidavit in reply for respondent

Nos. 1 & 2.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 792 OF 2018 (Shri Keshav R. Bankar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri N.V. Borse, learned Advocate holding

for Shri J.M. Wagh Patil, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Mrs. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2019 (Shri Govind P. Gite V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri A.S. Kulkarni, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Mrs. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2019 (Shri Sainath K. Matkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri Prasad D. Jarare, learned Advocate

for the applicant and Mrs. Priya R. Bharaswadkar,







M.A.NO. 69/2019 IN O.A.ST.NO. 323/2019 (Smt. Sarika B. Patole V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri R.P. Deshmukh, learned Advocate

holding for Shri V.M. Maney, learned Advocate for the

applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 689 OF 2015 (Dr. Shrikant B. Tambe V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Ms. Rebekah Daniel, learned Advocate

holding for Shri S.B. Talekar, learned Advocate for the

applicant, Mrs. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned

Presenting Officer for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, Shri

Pradeep R. Patil, learned Advocate for respondent No. 5

and Shri V.B. Wagh, learned Advocate for respondent

No. 6.


to 24.6.2019 for filing fresh affidavit in reply of

respondent Nos. 1 to 3.



AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD M.A. 509/17 IN O.A.ST.1671/17 WITH M.A.510/17 IN O.A.ST.1672/17

WITH M.A.511/17 IN O.A.ST.1673/17 (Sambhaji S. Patil & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE ORDER TRIBUNAL’S ORDERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.K. Choudhari, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Nitin K. Chaudhari, learned Advocate

for the applicants in all these cases and Shri V.R.

Bhumkar, learned Presenting Officer for the

respondents in all these cases. 2. At the request of learned Advocate for the

applicants, S.O. to 19.06.2019 for hearing.




O.A. NOS. 445, 446, 447, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 494 OF 2017 AND O.A. NOS. 113 AND 114/2018,

M.A. 325/2017 in O.A. St. 941/2017 WITH M.A. No. 36/2019 in M.A. St. 82/2019 in O.A. St. 83/2019 & M.A.NO. 144/19 IN O.A.ST.400/19 (Marathwada Van Va Samjik Vanikaran Rojandari Va Kayam Kamgar

Karmachari Va Sarva Shramik Sanghatana & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A)

DATE : 15.04.2019

ORAL ORDER :

Heard S/Shri A.S. Shelke, S.S. Shinde & V.G.

Pingle, learned Advocates for the respective applicants

in respective cases and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned

Chief Presenting Officer for the respondents in all these

cases.

2. At the request of learned Chief Presenting Officer

for the respondents, S.O. to 19.07.2019 for filing sur-

rejoinder.




C.P.NO. 77/2018 IN O.A.NO. 494/2016 (Shri Laxmikant G. Ratnaparkhi V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)





Heard Shri S.B. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the applicant and Smt. Sajnivani Deshmukh-Ghate,


2. Learned Advocate for the applicant has filed

rejoinder affidavit pursuant to the order dated

13.02.2019 and the same is taken on record and the

copy thereof has been served on the other side.

3. S.O. to 19.06.2019.




R.A.NO.1/2019 IN M.A.NO.329/2017 IN O.A.ST.NO.1194/2017 (Narayan D. Shete V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Smt. Vidya Taksal, learned Advocate

holding for Smt. S.A. Dhongde, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. At the request of the learned Advocate for the

Applicant, S.O. to 13.06.2019.

MEMBER (A) SAS ORAL ORDER 15-04-2019 bpp



ORIGINAL APPLICATION ST. NO.629/2019 (Anil M. Chaudhari V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri H.A. Joshi, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondents.



MEMBER (A) SAS ORAL ORDER 15-04-2019



ORIGINAL APPLICATION ST.NO.577/2019 (Manchak K. Gurle V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Vijay A. Dhakne, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.379/2017 (Shri Sanjay N. Nade V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Arvind Jadhav, learned Advocate

holding for Shri R.O. Awasarmal, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.213/2017 (K.M. Jadhav V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri D.T. Devane, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.581/2017 (Smt. M.S. Kathar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri D.T. Devane, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.487/2018 (Ramchandra L. Kulkarni V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.579/2018 (Shri Kapil I. Sontakke & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.C. Swami, learned Advocate holding

for Shri V.D. Gunale, learned Advocate for the

Applicants and Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting



Applicants, S.O. to 29.04.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.711/2018 (Sanjay N. Nade V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri V.G. Pingle, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Smt. M.S. Patni, learned Presenting


2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents files affidavit-

in-reply on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. The

same is taken on record and copy thereof has been

served on the Applicant.

3. S.O. to 24.06.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.755/2018 (Abhay R. Kadam V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri D.A. Bide, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned Presenting







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.977/2018 (Parag M. Nawalkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay S. Deshpande, learned Advocate

for the Applicant, Smt. Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate,

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondent No.1

and Smt. Vidya Taksal, learned Advocate holding for

Shri Avinash S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for the

Respondent No.2 2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant files affidavit-

in-rejoinder. The same is taken on record and copies

thereof have been served on the other sides.

3. S.O. to 30.04.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.39/2019 (Urmila P. Thakur & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri R.B. Temak, learned Advocate for the

Applicants and Smt. Priya R. Bharaswadkar, learned







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.89/2019 (Rajendra A. Jehurkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.D. Joshi, learned Advocate for the

Applicant, Shri N.U. Yadav, learned Presenting Officer

for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Shri V.B. Wagh,

learned Advocate for the Respondent No.4.

2. By consent adjourned to 02.05.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.99/2019 (Dr. Vinayak S. Sirsat & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.D. Joshi, learned Advocate for the

Applicants and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned Presenting







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.105/2019 (Rupesh V. Chavan V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri D.A. Bide, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Smt. Sanjivani K. Deshmukh-Ghate,

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. At the request of the learned P.O. for the

Respondents, S.O. to 02.05.2019 for filing affidavit-in-

reply.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.216/2019 (Bharat P. Rathod V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri V.B. Wagh, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief


2. At the request of the learned C.P.O. for the

Respondents, S.O. to 25.04.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.234/2019 (Kailas S. Mogale V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



holding for Shri Suresh D. Dhongde, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned


2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents submits that

the Applicant has been reinstated in service and

therefore, nothing survives in the present O.A.

3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant also submits

that in view of the submission of the learned P.O.,

grievance of the Applicant has been redressed and

nothing survives in the present O.A. Therefore, she

seeks permission of this Tribunal to withdraw the

present Original Application.

4. Permission granted. Withdrawal is allowed.

Accordingly, Original Application is disposed of as

withdrawn without any order as to costs.




M.A.NO.197/2018 IN O.A.945/2018 (Musaddiq Ahmed Madni V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri Prafulla D. Bodade, learned Advocate

holding for Shri J.B. Choudhary, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned







M.A.NO.91/2019 IN O.A.ST.192/2019 (Ashok B. Amrutkar & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



holding for Smt. Suchita A. Dhongde, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Shri M.P. Gude, learned


2. Shri Subhash S. Chillarge, learned Advocate has

filed VAKALATNAMA on behalf of the Respondent No.3.

3. Learned P.O. for the Respondents seeks time to

file affidavit-in-reply on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1

& 2.

4. Time as prayed for is granted.

5. S.O. to 27.06.2019.




M.A.NO.132/2019 IN O.A.ST.784/2018 (Yogesh B. Amrutkar V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.N. Suryawanshi, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Shri S.K. Shirse learned







M.A.NO.366/2018 IN M.A.ST.NO.1591/2019 IN

O.A.ST.NO.1592/2019 (Dr. Ravindra A. Daware & Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.G. Kulkarni, learned Advocate

holding for Shri Ajay S. Deshpande, learned Advocate

for the Applicants and Shri S.K. Shirse learned



Applicants, S.O. to 22.04.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.27/2019 (Raosaheb D. Patil V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.N. Suryawanshi, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Shri V.R. Bhumkar, learned







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.265/2017 (Dr. S.M. Karamunge V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri I.D. Maniyar, learned Advocate for the

Applicant, Shri M.S. Mahajan, learned Chief

Presenting Officer for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and

Shri D.S. Mali, learned Advocate for the Respondent

No.4.






ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.275/2017 (Shri Mohd. Asfiouddin and Ors. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri I.D. Maniyar, learned Advocate for the

Applicant, Smt. Deepali S. Deshpande, learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and

Shri S.E. Madne, learned Advocate for the Respondent

No.4.

2. At the request of the learned P.O. for the

Respondents, S.O. to 02.05.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.424/2017 (Sheshrao R. Kharate V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)



holding for Shri Suresh D. Dhongde, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Shri N.U. Yadav, learned







ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.667/2017 (Sandip K. Patil V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri S.A. Gaikwad, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Shri D.R. Patil, learned Presenting


2. Learned P.O. for the Respondents has produced

the relevant documents. The same is taken on record

and marked as ‘X’ for the purpose of the identification.

3. S.O. to 02.05.2019.




ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.69/2018 (Ajabrao R. Patil V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.)


CORAM : ATUL RAJ CHADHA, MEMBER (A) DATE : 15.04.2019 ORAL ORDER : Heard Shri A.D. Sugdare, learned Advocate for

the Applicant, Shri B.S. Deokar, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 and Smt. Vidya

Taksal, learned Advocate holding for Shri Suresh D.

Dhongde, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.3.




office order tribunal s orders coram : a.r ...farad continuation sheet in the maharashtra...

Documents