ogc bsi update session - geospatial & bim conference castaing.pdfogc – bsi update session...

®

®

OGC – bSI

Update Session

Christophe Castaing & Bart De Lathouwer

11th December, 2015

GeoBIM, Amsterdam

OGC ®

Agenda

• Introduction & Setting the stage

• bSI and OGC update

– InfraRoom projects

– InfraGML

– FutureCity Pilot

• Panel Discussion

© 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

OGC ®

Introduction


OGC ®

Setting the stage

• Reduce overall cost (of failure) (12 – 13% (or is it 20%?))

– Even a 1% decrease is a huge saving

• Increase efficiency, decrease loss of information

– Heterogeneous environment, disciplines, …


Pla

nn

ing

Co

nce

ptu

al

Desig

n

Deta

ile

d

De

sig

n

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Ma

inte

na

nc

e

Man

ag

em

en

t

OGC ®

Setting the stage

• Reduce overall cost (of failure) (12 – 13% (or is it 20%?))

– Even a 1% decrease is a huge saving

• Increase efficiency, decrease loss of information

– Seamless interoperability between phases, use of open models


Pla

nn

ing

Co

nce

ptu

al

Desig

n

Deta

ile

d

De

sig

n

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Ma

inte

na

nc

e

Man

ag

em

en

t

OGC ®

Setting the stage

• Where are Geo and BIM on this map?


Pla

nn

ing

Co

nce

ptu

al

Desig

n

Deta

ile

d

De

sig

n

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Ma

inte

na

nc

e

Man

ag

em

en

t

OGC ®

Setting the stage

• Quid Civil Engineering?

– Mix of Geospatial and BIM


Pla

nn

ing

Co

nce

ptu

al

Desig

n

Deta

ile

d

De

sig

n

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Ma

inte

na

nc

e

Man

ag

em

en

t

OGC ®

Setting the stage

• Increase interoperability

– prevent loss of information

– preserve design information


Pla

nn

ing

Co

nce

ptu

al

Desig

n

Deta

ile

d

De

sig

n

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Ma

inte

na

nc

e

Man

ag

em

en

t

OGC ®

Collaboration OGC, bSI and ISO TC 59

• Memorandum of Understanding

– Work on joint standards

• Not the first time we touch on the topic

– AECOO-1 Testbed (2009), delivery of BIM through OWS

• Relevant working groups (in OGC)

– CityGML, IndoorGML, Urban Planning DWG, Land &

Infra DWG


http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/aecoo-1



®

®

Infrastructure Room

Projects in progress

10 11/12/2015

C.CASTAING

OGC ®

QEZ3 – Bim manager

11

11/12/2015 C.CASTAING

OGC ®

OV

ER

AL

L A

rch

itectu

re

AS

SE

T M

an

ag

em

en

t

IFC RAILS

Projects in progress

12


IFC align 1.0 IFC align 1.1 IFC ROADS

IFC Bridge

OGC ®

Infrastructure

Industries and Standards for rail

13


Manufacturing systems

Embedded

equipment

buildings

OGC ®

Structures

CSNE

Génie Civil

Systèmes

Écluse

Pompe …

Terrassement

Géotechnique

VRD

Rétablissement

Quai de transbordement

Grue …

COM-AUB

MOI-AUB

…

PAS-MOI

COM-MOI

…

COM-PAS

MON-PAS

COM-MON

MON - Monmacq

COM- Compiègne

PAS- Passel

AUB – Aubencheul-au-bac

Quai Céréalier

Plate-forme d’activité

SYSTEMS BREAKDOWN SPATIAL BREAKDOWN

Exigences tenue séisme

REQUIREMENTS

Eurocodes

EC2

EC3

EC8

ICTAAL

Exigences

CCTP-CSNE

CONTRACT

Exigences

…

ECL0

D15

PF-CSNE BIEF 1

Étanchéité

BIEF 2

Quai Tbdt.THO

Exigences

ACSNE-1…

RET-BIEF1-D15

Exigences

Quai Tbdt.RIB

CSNE-EXEMPLE


14

OGC ®

Inspire

Standards and interoperability

cityg

ml

ifc Ifc_roads/ra

ils

landinfragml

Ifc_alignmen

t

senso

rml PPBIM

RailXML

topoml

PLCS

ISO

CEN

bSI OGC UCI

1/SCALE


15

OGC ®

IFC City GML PLCS ?

Lifecycle

Standards in the Industry


OGC ®

Organisation

ISO

CEN

Vienna agreement

AFNOR

BSI

bSI

OGC

UIC


17

OGC ®

Overall architecture


18

OGC ® 11/12/2015 C.CASTAING

19

OGC ®

LandInfra

Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

• Addresses Civil Engineering space

– Follow on to LandXML

– Fully defined conceptual model

– Common UML model synchronized

between OGC and bSI

– For encoding in GML, other

encodings

• Public review completed in early

2015

• Bentley at Lead as Editor and DWG

/ SWG chair

• Conceptual model standard

approved during the Sydney TC

®

®

OGC FutureCity Pilot

Bart De Lathouwer

OGC Director, Interoperability Programs

11th December, 2015

GeoBIM, Amsterdam

OGC ®

FutureCities Pilot

• Coordinated effort between OGC and buildingSMART International

• Seeking sponsors, most of work is intended to occur in Europe

• Pilot will demonstrate and enhance the ability of cities to use diverse,

interoperating spatial technologies to deliver improved quality of life,

civic initiatives, and resilience

Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

http://www.opengeospatial.org/pressroom/pressreleases/2290



OGC ®

Sponsors


Sant Cugat del Vallès

OGC ®

An OGC Framework for Smart Cities

• “OGC Smart Cities Spatial

Information Framework” – https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=61188

• Influenced by: – OGC’s geospatial, sensor, processing,

mobile standards work

– Survey of Smart City Standards Activities:

• JTC 1, ITU, ISO, BSI, DIN, others

– Survey of OGC CityGML implementations

• Goals:

– Pilot Smart Cities Spatial Framework in

select cities (http://www.opengeospatial.org/blog/1886)

– Advance an OGC Best Practice for Location

Enabled Smart Cities

OGC Smart Cities Spatial Information

Framework

https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=61188

http://www.opengeospatial.org/blog/1886

http://www.opengeospatial.org/blog/1886

OGC ®

What are we going to do and make

• Scenarios :

– Sensor/value associated to City model

• Flooding, Air Quality, River height, ….

• Analysis purposes, what if scenarios

– Making city data available in an interoperable format

• Technology :

– IFC <->CityGML

– Serving IFC through OGC Services

– Building City Models from existing data

– Dynamizer (real time sensor input)


http://213.136.91.254/tjs

OGC ®

Contributing Cities

• Barcelona

• Royal Borough of Greenwish

• Milano

– Through technico di Milano

• Cần Thơ (Vietnam)

– World Bank

• (Utrecht)

• (France)


OGC ®

Timing

• RFQ End of December 2015

– Seek participation

– Cost covering

• 31 January ‘16, Selection of participants

• 29 February ‘16, Kick-off

• Intermediate results

– OGC TC Dublin

– Resilient Cities, July

– INSPIRE Conference

• Final results, September ‘16

– OGC TC Orlando

• SmartCity Congress


®

®

OGC – bSI

Panel Discussion

Christophe Castaing & Bart De Lathouwer

11th December, 2015

GeoBIM, Amsterdam

OGC ®

Panel

• Phil Jackson (UK BIM Taskforce)

• François Robida (BRGM)

• Cristian Otter (Geonius)

• Vincent De Breuck (TucRail)


OGC ®

Setting the stage

• Increase interoperability

– prevent loss of information

– preserve design information


Pla

nn

ing

Co

nce

ptu

al

Desig

n

Deta

ile

d

De

sig

n

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Op

era

te &

Man

ag

e

OGC ®

31


Reactions of the panel on standards for construction

a question on systems under the rail approach

a question of existing conditions managements

A question on the structures approach

question on standards and interoperability

OGC ®

Notes

• Intros

– From the field: we standards to do our work

– How to pass information (not just geom) from 1 part of the process

to another

– Link things

– Influence of geology on infrastructure

– Ability to co-operate, there is a need and will

• Standards are a must

• Interop betwen SDO’s

• Impact of digital transformation, exchange pubtwwen public and private

– Information and interoperability


OGC ®

Notes (Rail)

• Do we have a full view of what we have to exchange?

– Short: no

• Infrastructure exchange with the real world and the build

environment

– They interface closely

• Information is different per stake-holder

– View on information

– View = Customer needs (schema)

• General schema that will fit, depending on requirement

– Can that be done

• We zork on islands, when put together => mess


OGC ®

• 3D for clash detection

• Do you need 3D in FM?

• (infrastucture)

• Balance of design and info exchange?

– Conceptual design, keep end design in mind

– Lots of models to integrate (model, road, infra, terrain,...)

– Tpt data, loss of info

– Keep information attached to ‘objects’

• (Geology-geotechnical)

– Lifecycle of infra is long (era)


OGC ®

• Sub-surface/geo-hazards

– Describe consistently

– Not easy to stdz,

– Create 3D models of sub-surface, but hardly reused -> consolidate

• Try to reuse

• 100 units for design

– 70% used for exchange

– 30% added value

– 90 engineers for design, 30 for coordination (only)


OGC ®

• “Liberate” designer

– Reduce labor amount to communicate

– The info that the next designer needs

• Better use of the designers

• Coordination of data flow

– Have a data flow chart, understand that flow

– Think first! (initial time gained, lost afterwards)

• Interop to win time (not lose time)

– Dont pass designs/plans, but models

– Time lost on convertion

• Conversion of geom type

– Models comparison if designed async

• Change detection


OGC ®

• Geom conversion

– To and from

• (geotechnical)

– Exchange from geo-technical

– Metadata!!

• Lack off, quality low

• Lose rational of design (without MD)

• Need for MD (albeit a ‘boring’ topic)

– Provide ‘raw’ data vs specific (web) services

• Cfr weather forcast (you dont get raw data , but specific forecast)


OGC ®

• Metadata

– Dataset might be used for a single purpose

– Fit for purpose

– Metadata is just as important of the model

– Quality of data

• Provenance, new data, LOD, ...

• Geometrical, Metadata, geometry (balance)

– 60% geo related, 40% CAD related

– What is % of metadata?

– (historical)GIS was not 3D, CAD went 3D

– CAD and GIS coming together


OGC ®

• CAD,GIS,BIM = process

– Available, centralized (interope)

– Use the same terms (vocabulary, obj lib)

• (from designer)

– Lots of Geo data avail, now also avail at start

– Early models contain geo data (context)

– Understand each others data, through context

• Don’t focus on terms GIS/CAD


OGC ®

• 20% is geom/topo

– Rest if ‘other’ info (that needs to be retained, context)

– That other info is used elsewhere in the process

• Not a global std to manage everything (!)

– Std are never finished

– (Need to take that into account)

– Eg INSPIRE

• List of terms changes over time

• The reference terminology changes (take this into account)


OGC ®

• Manage data for life-cycle

– Each designer has it own requirements (each have own model)

– Model now, will not be the same as in 10 years

– How to simplify, manageable units

– Use of data dictionary

– Lifecycle of data > lifecycle of software

• Interop is ability to communicate

• What with willingness

– Move towards open data

• Will lead to more exchange amd more open data


OGC ®

• (open data)

– For public data

– But some parts need to be private (contracts, privacy, IPR,...)

– Info requiremnts from organizational req, project req

• Need to feed through the process (HS2)

• Asset info will be there forever

– (Open data)

• Information security (eg for critical infra)

– Design:

• Better models (because of more (open) data)

– Better design, better decisions


OGC ®

• (open data)

– Leads to better information management

• (measure only once)

• Open data in large infra projects

– Needs management, business model

– Continuity of digital information

• Beginning to end


OGC ®

Align terminology

(universal schema)

Quality/MD

Ability compare datasets

Std will guide designers and avoid diff models

Don’t boil the ocean

baby steps, transmit geom/attribs amongst apps

not at a stage to allow full model edits along the way

Exchnage of 3D geology models

connection with the other domains

SDO to work together

Put together: doman experts, soft dev, designers, ... (community)

domain focus(end user involvement), not IT focus


ogc bsi update session - geospatial & bim conference castaing.pdfogc – bsi update session...

Documents