okerholm va boundary option to board 01192012
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
1/29
EOs
VA Boundary Option Vertical Alignment
http://www.getodd.com/duck/alignment.html -
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
2/29
Why are We Here? Why are you here? to alleviate over crowding at CRHS Why am I here and why listen to me? I accurately and logically represent the data
Oak Brook Resident, taxpayer, with kids in LISD and RRISD (McNeil and Cedar Valley) I have 3 Masters Degrees, one of them a Master of Information Management from
Washington University in STL. I am a 13+ year Business Intelligence Professional:
I have over a decade of CXO level presentations and recommendations. See client list and history next slide
I can objectively look at the data, not just for my neighborhood or elementaryschool, but as I have shown, repeatedly, The ENTIRE District.
The VA plan which vertically aligns RRISD and stabilizes capacity against growth for 9years before the likelihood of another HS Boundary Change, and saves Million$ issupported by families in the following areas/communities:
Wells Branch Stone Oak/Mayfield Ranch Walsh Trails Great Oaks Elem ( yes, Great Oaks too ) Brushy Creek Elem Cedar Valley (Oak Brook, Avery, Cat Hallow, Brushy Creek, etc.) McNeil
2
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
3/29
Educational Background
3
M.H.A. (Master of Health Administration) with Honors , Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, May 1998.
M.I.M. (Master of Information Management) ,
Emphasis in Database Structure and Management , Washington University Schoolof Engineering and Applied Science, St. Louis, MO, May 1998.
M.S. Human Anatomy & Physiology (equivalent) The Ohio State University College of Medicine; Medical Education CareerPathway (MEDPATH), Columbus, OH, 1993-1996.
B.S. Zoology (Minors in Human Nutrition & Psychology) ,The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, June 1992.
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
4/29
Current & Previous Clients
Duke UniversityMedical Center
4
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
5/29
HS Boundary Moves SolvedNow and Later (again )
Realigning Boundaries Back Now Repairs unnecessary issues presented after the last boundary decision
2008 Enrollment Data, on hand, was overlooked that showed the population bulge in CRthat lead to this boundary change needed WE DIDNT NEED TO BE HERE
The boundaries presented in 2009 are still solid, true, viable, statistically sound and accurate -providing capacity and stability to the District for an additional 9 years!
The District will again be re-established and stable for years to come and ready and able to handlegrowth in the obvious areas (currently & with the current proposal this is not the case)
Discontinues HS Legacies that should not have been started - The longer they are allowed tocontinue, the harder and more painful future changes become to families and the communities(rightfully so)
Safer = No one will cross IH 35 MS Vertical Alignment is restored for ALL Schools as well as primed for High School #6 in 9+ years Is Proactive: The capacity is there to proactively prepare for growth & still remain stable/strong
Planning ahead, moving to Next HS Boundary (for HS #6) is practically seamless All Elementary & Middle Schools that feed HS#6 are completely aligned All District HS schools still thrive and survive and are prepped to handle growth and a boundary
change for HS#6 in 9+ years, if/when needed - but in a turn key fashion No Boundary CommitteeNeeded 5
http://www.getodd.com/duck/alignment.html -
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
6/29
This is not about SES or UIL
6
HS WB Only
CRHS 32.94% 33.08%
MHS 20.5% 21.11%
RRHS 18.3% 18.3%
SPHS 39.42% 39.42%
WW 11.3% 11.32%
HS WB Only
CRHS 30.5% 33%
MHS 18.2% 21%
RRHS 21.4% 18%
SPHS 43% 40%
WW 11.3% 11.3%
I called and spoke with Darryl Beasley in the Athletics Department of UIL whoconfirmed that if a student/athlete is moved schools because of a District zoningchange, the student/athletes UIL Eligibility is NOT AFFECTED.
This information can be found on the UILTexas website under the Constitution andContest Rules, Subchapter M, Section 440 b(2) (page 3-4)
www.uiltexas.org/policy/constitution/catergory/constitution-general www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdf
District Plan SES RTW Plan SES*
* as calculated by The District
http://www.uiltexas.org/policy/constitution/catergory/constitution-generalhttp://www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdfhttp://www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdfhttp://www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdfhttp://www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdfhttp://www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdfhttp://www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdfhttp://www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdfhttp://www.uiltexas.org/files/constitution/uil-ccr-subchapter-m.pdfhttp://www.uiltexas.org/policy/constitution/catergory/constitution-generalhttp://www.uiltexas.org/policy/constitution/catergory/constitution-generalhttp://www.uiltexas.org/policy/constitution/catergory/constitution-general -
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
7/29
This is Not About Capacityor 3000 Students
7
HS HS Capacity @ 3000 Actual Capacity @ 3000
CR 2440 3000 123%
RR 2932 3000 102%
MN 2366 3000 127%
SP 2454 3000 122%WW 2612 3000 115%
HS Capacity 125% Value 130% Value
CR 2440 1.25 3050 1.3 3172RR 2942 1.25 3678 1.3 3825
MN 2366 1.25 2958 1.3 3076
SP 2454 1.25 3068 1.3 3190
WW 2612 1.25 3265 1.3 3396
Not all schools share the samecapacity volume restrictions
orScary numbers
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
8/29
You cant predict the future,but you can certainly prepare for it!
8
CRHS in VA2012 = 2921
Adding in WB
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
9/29
In 2009 The District Predicted 2455 enrollmentfor 2012 for CRHS! (a 460 student difference )
9Source: District Boundary Presentation for G2 032009
2008 => 29322012 => 2881 (District*)2012 => 2921 (VA Plan)
* District Moves Berkman/CD Fulkes, I do not
http://www.getodd.com/duck/alignment.html -
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
10/29
Tere McCanns (CFO, private industry) (School Boundary Committee)Vetted District Enrollment Data
12+ years of District Enrollment Data (2012-2024) Based on actual students in RRISD in school NOW, by year, by school, by grade (K-12) Leveraging generally acceptable practices and statistical analysis
More Accurate Cohort survival ratios, longer aging and averaging, and believableadjustable growth rates, etc.
The data presented from BOTHplans to the BC by Mr. Flores on 1/12 was inaccurate That data was used to judge and determine support for/or against each plan That data is still not accurate today.
District stated Capacity does not include portables (I do later)
10
Bigger imageNext Slide
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
11/29
11
Capacity does not include portables (I do later)
80 acres
93 acres
47 acres
VA
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
12/29
District Plan Guarantees BoundaryAlignment needed 2016
12
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
13/29
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
14/29
1) Move Great Oaksboundary back toand reunite ALL CVstudents at McNeil,include Horizongiven ES, MS feederpattern
2) WB volume toRRHS & Stone Oak/Mayfield Ranch backto RRHS to back fillthe Great OaksStudents and prep
for future
VA Boundarysuggestion
14
3) Vertically align allof Grisham toWestwood
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
15/29
Boundary move suggestion current (2012) (includes SPHS/CRHS)
*Enrollment based on Sept, 2011 Enrollment Report**Capacity does not include portables
Campus *Enrollment **Capacity %age Portables
Cedar Ridge 2921 (4 grades) 2440 120% 10McNeil 2532 2366 107% 12
Round Rock 2712 2942 92% 10
Stony Point 2136 2454 87% 9
Westwood 2602 2612 100% 17
Total 12903 12814 101% 58 15
Option VA Data (2012)
Campus *Enrollment **Capacity %age Portables
Cedar Ridge 2881 (4 grades) 2440 118% 10McNeil 2383 2366 101% 12
Round Rock 2730 2942 93% 10
Stony Point 2308 2454 94% 9
Westwood 2602 2612 100% 17
Total 12904 12814 101% 58
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
16/29
Boundary move suggestion current (2011) (includes SPHS/CRHS)
*Enrollment based on Sept, 2011 Enrollment Report**Capacity does not include portables
48*$14000 = $672,000/year
16
Option VA Data (2012) with portables adjusted
Capacity does not include Portables (22 per)
Adjusted w/ Portables
2660 108%
2630 91%
3162 86%
2652 87%
2986 87%14090 90%
Adjusted w/ Portables
2660 110%
2542 100%
2942 92%
2454 87%
2612 100%
13210 98%
Campus Enrollment **Capacity %age Portables
Cedar Ridge 2921 2440 120% 10McNeil 2532 2366 107% 8
Round Rock 2712 2942 92% 0
Stony Point 2136 2454 87% 0
Westwood 2602 2612 100% 0
Total 12903 12814 101% 18
Campus *Enrollment **Capacity %age Portables
Cedar Ridge 2881 2440 118% 10
McNeil 2383 2366 101% 12
Round Rock 2730 2942 93% 10
Stony Point 2308 2454 94% 9
Westwood 2602 2612 100% 17 Total 12904 12814 101% 58
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
17/29
Boundary move suggestion current (2012) (includes SPHS/CRHS)
*Enrollment based on Sept, 2011 Enrollment Report**Capacity does not include portables
48*$14000 = $672,000/year
17
Option VA Data (2012) with portables adjusted
Capacity does not include Portables (22 per)
Adjusted w/ Portables
2660 108%
2630 91%
3162 86%
2652 87%
2986 87%14090 90%
Adjusted w/ Portables
2660 110%
2542 100%
2942 92%
2454 87%
2612 100%
13210 98%
Campus Enrollment **Capacity %age Portables
Cedar Ridge 2921 2440 120% 10McNeil 2532 2366 107% 8
Round Rock 2712 2942 92% 0
Stony Point 2136 2454 87% 0
Westwood 2602 2612 100% 0
Total 12903 12814 101% 18
Campus *Enrollment **Capacity %age Portables
Cedar Ridge 2881 2440 118% 10
McNeil 2383 2366 101% 12
Round Rock 2730 2942 93% 10
Stony Point 2308 2454 94% 9
Westwood 2602 2612 100% 17 Total 12904 12814 101% 58
Readjust Portable Allocation to satisfy capacity needs
40 portables saved = $560,000(11.7 teacher salaries @ $48,000 avg)
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
18/29
VA Allows For Choice:
If you are already attending a particular HSand are happy there, YOU CAN STAY WHEREYOU ARE as a transfer and all students in the
family will be allowed to stay in the school if the family choses to stay as a transfer (regardless of grade ).
In addition, because of the previousboundary change the District should continueto provide bus service for 3 years.
If you are already enrolled in HS and CHOOSEto move to the new school and live withinthe bussing distance guidelines - You will be
bussed to the new school. ALL MIDDLE SCHOOLS STAY TOGETHER
ALL Existing Middle School Students willSTAY WITH THEIR MIDDLES SCHOOLCLASSMATES and be zoned to HStogether as leading Educators have
strongly suggested is in the Best Interestof the Students. 18
No current HS students have to move! NONE!
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
19/29
STAY WHERE YOU ARE
19
No one has to move high schools. Yes, NO ONE Stay where you currently are enrolled and
attending, as a transfer with bus serviceOR Choose, as a family, for your son/daughter to go
where the boundary change puts them and stay
with ALLof their middle school classmates All Middle School students stay together
throughout the entire District
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
20/29
100 % Vertical Alignment MS to HS with VA
20
Current - verified
Cedar Ridge
CD Fulkes Chisholm* Ridgeview
McNeil Cedar Valley* Deerpark
Round Rock Cedar Valley* Chisholm* Walsh*
Stony Point Hernandez Hopewell Walsh*
West Wood Canyon Vista Grisham
VA 100% Aligned
Cedar Ridge CD Fulkes Ridgeview
McNeil Cedar Valley Deerpark
Round Rock Chisholm Walsh
Stony Point Hernandez Hopewell
West Wood Canyon Vista Grisham
* Split due to last boundary change
District - Proposed
Cedar Ridge CD Fulkes* Ridgeview
McNeil Cedar Valley* Deerpark
Round Rock Cedar Valley* Chisholm* Walsh*
Stony Point CD Fulkes* Hernandez Hopewell Walsh*
West Wood Canyon Vista
Grisham * Additional Split due to proposed boundary change
Wh i th Di t i t Ad i i t ti i thi
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
21/29
Why is the District Administration proposing somethingthat moves further away from their stated views?
21* Split due to last boundary change * Additional Split due to proposed boundary change
Dr. Chavezs sentiments expressed atSchool Boundary Committee meeting -
Vertical Alignment is the best solution for the District, but is
difficult to achieve.
Students who develop their relationships,especially in middle school, need to be able
to move as a group to high school , becausethink about it, they will be going to one middle school and then we would throw them into a big high school wherethey would have to reestablish those relationships where
as at least at a minimum, when you are moving frommiddle school to high school the transition wont be as
challenging (if you are together).That is my perspective as an educator.
Trustee Dr. Linelle ClarkBrown,RRISD School Board Meeting, April 7, 2009
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
22/29
Get Our Ducks in a Rowwith VA
Youve made amends AND given families and individuals choice to stay or move
Youve realigned vertical feeder patterns for the ENTIRE District - Middle to High School
Youve reduced portables and overcrowding
Youve saved $$ for educational improvements teacher salaries, other district employeesor infrastructure
Youve realigned with community support and natural boundaries (IH35 and 183)
Youve minimalized disturbance ACROSS THE DISTRICT and prepared yourself for 7 -10 yrs. NET ZERO MOVEMENTacross the District for all area HS students.
Vertical Alignment for ALL Middle Schools . Keep CD Fulkes/Berkman at CRHS for vertical alignment & to prep for future growth in
Stony Point HS Area with minimal movement later Horizons now feeding Elsa England and then CV should now go to McNeil All of Grisham should feed Westwood
ALL Middle school students in the District stay together to the same High School.
http://www.getodd.com/duck/alignment.html -
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
23/29
Option VA 2015 Data
23
Readjust Portable Allocation to satisfycapacity needs as they arrive
38 portables saved = $532,000(11.1 teacher salaries @ $48,000 avg)
Campus *2015 Enrollment **Capacity %age Portables
Cedar Ridge 2856 2440 117% 10
McNeil 2862 2366 121% 10
Round Rock 3049 2942 104% 0
Stony Point 2424 2454 99% 0
Westwood 2671 2612 102% 0
Total 13862 12814 108% 20
Adjusted w/ Portables
2660 107%
2586 111%
2942 104%
2454 99%
2612 102%
13254 105%
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
24/29
Campus *2019 Enrollment **Capacity %age Portables
Cedar Ridge 2983 2440 122% 12
McNeil 2944 2366 124% 12
Round Rock 3468 2942 118% 10
Stony Point 2924 2454 119% 4
Westwood 2469 2612 95% 0
Total 14788 12814 115% 38
Option VA 2019 Data
24
Adjusted w/ Portables
2704 110%
2630 112%
3162 110%
2542 115%
2612 95%
13650 108%
Readjust Portable Allocation to satisfycapacity needs as they arrive
20 portables saved = $280,000(5.83 teacher salaries @ $48,000 avg)
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
25/29
1) New HSFeeder,minimalbussing
2) E of 183 from
Westwoodreunited toMcNeil.
New HS #6Almost zero
buses
25
Overall Growth of Kids at Desks nowin suspectedareas, preparedfor others, even
unexpected
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
26/29
Option VA buys the districtsome serious time (9-10+years) on The East & The
West Side of IH35.
VA also prepares RRISD forgrowth ( IF and ) when ithappens for many yearsto come in a proactive
manner East OR West of IH35
26
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
27/29
Vertical Alignment Restored(again)
All Elementary Schools feed the same HS #6 Boundary.The new middle school that goes along with the HS
will maintain that consistent vertically alignedfeeder pattern as well, whenever that is needed.
27
-
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
28/29
Vertical Alignment
Satisfies the Boundary Committees Charter to relieve the overcrowding at Cedar RidgeHS. (The ONLY Item On The Charter regarding HS Students)
Satisfies the Districts and Boards desire to have minimal student movement of currently enrolled HS students .
28
Has NET ZEROforced movement of ANY current HS Student Vertically Aligns ALLDistrict Middle Schools to stay together to a
single High School. Creates room for transfers, across the District Is a 9+ year plan setting expectations and is fiscally responsible
Money saved could be spent on improving educational programs, teachers, employees,
infrastructure VA and data show that there is enough data and capacity to follow a 9 year growth plan and
not need a new HS, given current and projected growth until 2020 or 2021, if even then. Yes, I just said 9+ years. ( 12+ if you count the other boundaries in plans
proposed in 2009 that are still holding true ) Moves Portables not People
http://www.getodd.com/duck/alignment.html -
8/3/2019 Okerholm VA Boundary Option to Board 01192012
29/29
Thank you for your service, your time, and attention.You can reach me with any questions or follow up needs and/or further analysis