ole roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
1/25
Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake (1973)
Greetings: My name is Joe Nahhas and I am the founder of real time physics.
Real time physics is hacking nature "without a least of doubt and incontestable proof" physics.
Abstract: In1676an astrologer by the name ofOle Roemer proposed a hypothesis that lightvelocity is constant and claimed to had measured light velocity using Jupiter moon Io and came up
with a number to be equal to c = 299, 792, 458 meters per second (current NIST published
number) based on the constant areal velocity work of a previous astrologer named Johannes
Kepler. In 1905 a desk clerk by the name of Albert Einstein repeated what Ole Roemer said thatlight velocity is constant velocity. Light constant velocity or the idea of two travelers going in the
same direction at light speed c = 299, 792, 458 meters per second and their relative velocity is not
equal to zero but equal to c = 299, 792, 458 meters per second and two traveler going in opposite
directions at light velocity and their relative velocity is not 2 c = 2 x (299, 792, 458) but equal to c
is not science or scientific. The number c = 299, 792, 458 meters per second is not a measurement
of light velocity but a measurement of an artifact light velocity number like all 500 years of
western civilization modern + Nobel Prize winner artifacts physics laws and experimental
numbers and a "without a least of doubt and incontestable proof" that the number c = 299,792,
458 is light artifact velocity and not light velocity is the subject of this article and I dare all!
Table of contents: 1 - Artifact time two equations
2 - Light artifact velocity derivation and calculation
3- Without a least of doubt and incontestable proof and conclusion
Page 1
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://sepetjian.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/roemer0011.jpg&imgrefurl=http://sepetjian.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/olaf-roemer-the-objectivity-of-science/&h=400&w=298&sz=29&tbnid=K_pt0pWbF4TFNM:&tbnh=94&tbnw=70&prev=/search?q=romer+light+speed+images&tbm=isch&tbo=u&zoom=1&q=romer+light+speed+images&usg=__9PBNKmtDqrIyOZyyznBLPGLGAmM=&docid=xM6VL6B1ji1-uM&sa=X&ei=xb03UoXQK9GQyQGBhIHAAg&ved=0CFkQ9QEwDg&dur=2469http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://sepetjian.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/roemer0011.jpg&imgrefurl=http://sepetjian.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/olaf-roemer-the-objectivity-of-science/&h=400&w=298&sz=29&tbnid=K_pt0pWbF4TFNM:&tbnh=94&tbnw=70&prev=/search?q=romer+light+speed+images&tbm=isch&tbo=u&zoom=1&q=romer+light+speed+images&usg=__9PBNKmtDqrIyOZyyznBLPGLGAmM=&docid=xM6VL6B1ji1-uM&sa=X&ei=xb03UoXQK9GQyQGBhIHAAg&ved=0CFkQ9QEwDg&dur=2469 -
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
2/25
1 - Artifacts time two equations
1 =1 is self evident; 2= 2 is self evident; A = A is self evident; B = B is self evident
A = A; add and subtract B; then, A = B + (A - B); divide by B
(A/B) = 1 + (A - B)/B; multiply by D
(A/B) D = D + [(A - B)/B] D --------------------------------- Equation - 1
C = C is self evident; D = D is self evident
Or C = C; add and subtract D
C = D + (C - D) ----------------------------------------------- Equation - 2
Comparing equations 1 and 2 yields, (1) AC = BD; (2) D = D; and (3)
C - D = [(A - B)/B] D ----------------------------------------Equation - 3
Or (C - D)/D = (A - B)/B
Or D/D = B/B; Divide by t
(1/D) ( D/ t) = (1/B) ( B/ t)
Limit [(1/D) ( D/ t)] = Limit [(1/B) ( B/ t)] = ( + )
t 0 t 0
Or, d B/B = ( + ) d t and B = B0 e ( + ) t = A e ( + ) t
B = A e ( + ) t.
Distance is A; real time distance is B = A e ( + ) t
In general distance: r = r0 e ( + ) t
Constant velocity of light makes time
With r = c T = r0( + ) t
= cT0( + ) t
; r = c T; r0= c T0Einstein's error of time: Line time; = 0 and
T = T0 t -------------------------------------------------------------------- I
Page 2
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
3/25
T = T x + Ty= T0[cosine t + sine t]
Along the line of sight: T x = T0cosine t ----------------------------------- (1)
Kepler law of constant Areal velocity: d (r')/d t = 0; r'=h
And 2 r' ' + r"= 0 Eq-2
Separate the variables: 2 r' ' = - r "
Or 2(r'/r) = - ("/') = - 2 ( + )
Then: (r'/r) = +
Or d r/r = ( + ) d t
Then r = r0(+ )t
With - ("/') = - 2 ( + )
Then ' = '0 -2(+ ) t
Or, 2 /T = 2 /T0 -2(+ )t
Kepler's error of time:= 0; T = T02 t------------------------- II
Einstein's error of time: = 0; T = T0 t
Einstein's error along the line of sight:
T = T x+ Ty= T0 cosine t + T0sine t
Along the line of sight: T x = T0 cosine t ---------------------------------- (1)
Kepler's error along the line of sight:
T = T x+ Ty= T0 cosine 2 t + T0sine 2 t
Along the line of sight: T x = T0 cosine 2 t --------------------------------- (2)
From (2) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 t--------------------------------------- (3)
From (1) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2( t/2)---------------------------------- (4)
Page 3
Artifacts time two equations: I - T = T0 t;II - T = T02 t
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
4/25
2 - Light artifact velocity derivation and calculation
Earth as a physics lab looking into far away objects like Ole Roemer did when he presented
his hypothesis in 1676 looking at Jupiter moon Io that has a visual orbital period of
1.769137788 days (NASA's data) is a spinning moving sphere that has an atmosphere, a
spinning period of one day and an orbital period of 365.256 days (NASA's data). In all ofpublished physics there is not one publication where Earth's actual motion is mentioned.
All published physics about planet Earth's motion is relativistic motion or artifact motion.
All there is in the Universe is material objects assigned a number called density d or mass
m to differentiate the material object from empty space at a location r called distance.
Physics is a study of the product S = m r and the changes in the product of S along human
abstract scale called time t.
A - Take any published physics law published by any physicist from any period
of time in human historyand display the physics law in two different time frames and
the displayed results is subtracted from one another and the ratio is calculated to find
physics artifacts ratio and a surprise of one and only one numerical answer= 0.607500428
B - Take any published physics law published by any physicist from any period
of time in human historyand decipher the experimental data and it will be a surprise
combination of four numbers
I - Air density (mass) = 1.225 kg/m3 (Engineering Tool box)
II - Earth's sidereal period = 86164.09943 seconds
III - Air index of refraction = 1.000293
IV - Artifact ratio = 0.607500428
For example: Newton's gravitational law F = G m M/r2
G = 6.67384 x 10-11(NIST - Data)
The dimensions of [G] = 1/ (density) (time) 2
And G = 0.607500428/[da (Te) 2] (n a) 3
G = 0.607500428/[1.225(86164.09943) 2] (1.000293) 3
C - The artifact ratio 0.607500428 comes from?
Earth does move around the Sun
Page 4
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
5/25
1- Earth moves in a circle in 27.321 days (lunar period) and the sun moves
in another circle in 365.256 days (Earth's period)
2 - Earth's circle motion in 27.321 days and the Sun's circle motion in
365.256 days are not synchronized motions
3 - Not synchronized motions produce visual artifacts
4 - The artifacts value is calculated as follows
I - (365.256/27.321) =13.39605677
II- 13.36905677 - 13 (complete cycles) = 0.36905677
III - Circular artifacts is the square root of 0.36905677 = 0.607500428
Earth and Sun are spinning spheres with atmospheres
Celestial objects like the Moon, Mercury and Venus has no atmosphere
Moon: No atmosphere Mercury: No atmosphere Venus: Insignificant atmosphere
Page 5
EarthSun
Moon Mercury Venus
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
6/25
Atmosphere - Spin Atmosphere - spin
No atmosphere and no spin No atmosphere and no spin No atmosphere - no spin
Atmosphere = spin + Circle motion Atmosphere = spin + Circle motion
No atmosphere = no spin = no circle motion = bum Moon Mercury and Venus
Page 6
EarthSun
Moon Mercury Venus
EarthSun
Moon Mercury Venus
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
7/25
Kepler was aChristian Astrologer who looked at astronomical data to predictits impact on human life like an astrologer does guided byChristianitybelief of a "Center
of Universe". Kepler's laws came from astronomical data that came from two others
Christians Nicolaus Copernicus and Tyco Brahe. Astrologer Kepler inherited and
practiced his Christian belief astrology that carried two holly ideas of "center"
Johannes Kepler Nicolaus Copernicus Tyco Brahe's
(1) Christianity idea of"Center of Universe" featured in 15th centuryChurch/
Copernicus duel.Nicolaus Copernicus and the Catholic Church fight was about a "center of
Universe" and ended with a shift of the "center of Universe" from Earth to the Sun. Center of
Universe and not "center of motion"wasthe central ideaon the market in 15th century
(2)Christianity idea of"Center of Universe data fit" ofClergy Tyco Brahe and not
"center of motion data fit". Kepler analyzed Tyco Brahe's data to fit an already on the
market ideaof"Center of Universe/Sun data fit" and not "center of motion data fit"
Page 7
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=JlmF_PJgQW0RqM:&imgrefurl=http://thewallmachine.com/CFYerj.html&docid=4fjr-vMHgVJ5VM&imgurl=http://thewallmachine.com/files/1354685726.jpg&w=200&h=200&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=818&vpy=128&dur=563&hovh=160&hovw=160&tx=93&ty=91&sig=110339042596991037901&page=2&tbnh=144&tbnw=144&start=17&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:22,s:0,i:170http://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=Vv0INXhvSDpvnM:&imgrefurl=http://countinfinity.blogspot.com/2010/09/ptolemys-theory.html&docid=eAYyk3Vx05_teM&imgurl=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2u1kcob-sQ0/TIDQwJ1V7HI/AAAAAAAAAcU/vL1zoVGFzis/s1600/geocentric.gif&w=168&h=230&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=171&vpy=167&dur=469&hovh=184&hovw=134&tx=70&ty=97&sig=110339042596991037901&page=1&tbnh=142&tbnw=104&start=0&ndsp=17&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:101http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nikolaus_Kopernikus.jpghttp://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=JlmF_PJgQW0RqM:&imgrefurl=http://thewallmachine.com/CFYerj.html&docid=4fjr-vMHgVJ5VM&imgurl=http://thewallmachine.com/files/1354685726.jpg&w=200&h=200&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=818&vpy=128&dur=563&hovh=160&hovw=160&tx=93&ty=91&sig=110339042596991037901&page=2&tbnh=144&tbnw=144&start=17&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:22,s:0,i:170http://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=Vv0INXhvSDpvnM:&imgrefurl=http://countinfinity.blogspot.com/2010/09/ptolemys-theory.html&docid=eAYyk3Vx05_teM&imgurl=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2u1kcob-sQ0/TIDQwJ1V7HI/AAAAAAAAAcU/vL1zoVGFzis/s1600/geocentric.gif&w=168&h=230&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=171&vpy=167&dur=469&hovh=184&hovw=134&tx=70&ty=97&sig=110339042596991037901&page=1&tbnh=142&tbnw=104&start=0&ndsp=17&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:101http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nikolaus_Kopernikus.jpghttp://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=JlmF_PJgQW0RqM:&imgrefurl=http://thewallmachine.com/CFYerj.html&docid=4fjr-vMHgVJ5VM&imgurl=http://thewallmachine.com/files/1354685726.jpg&w=200&h=200&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=818&vpy=128&dur=563&hovh=160&hovw=160&tx=93&ty=91&sig=110339042596991037901&page=2&tbnh=144&tbnw=144&start=17&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:22,s:0,i:170http://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=Vv0INXhvSDpvnM:&imgrefurl=http://countinfinity.blogspot.com/2010/09/ptolemys-theory.html&docid=eAYyk3Vx05_teM&imgurl=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2u1kcob-sQ0/TIDQwJ1V7HI/AAAAAAAAAcU/vL1zoVGFzis/s1600/geocentric.gif&w=168&h=230&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=171&vpy=167&dur=469&hovh=184&hovw=134&tx=70&ty=97&sig=110339042596991037901&page=1&tbnh=142&tbnw=104&start=0&ndsp=17&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:101http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nikolaus_Kopernikus.jpghttp://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=JlmF_PJgQW0RqM:&imgrefurl=http://thewallmachine.com/CFYerj.html&docid=4fjr-vMHgVJ5VM&imgurl=http://thewallmachine.com/files/1354685726.jpg&w=200&h=200&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=818&vpy=128&dur=563&hovh=160&hovw=160&tx=93&ty=91&sig=110339042596991037901&page=2&tbnh=144&tbnw=144&start=17&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:22,s:0,i:170http://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=Vv0INXhvSDpvnM:&imgrefurl=http://countinfinity.blogspot.com/2010/09/ptolemys-theory.html&docid=eAYyk3Vx05_teM&imgurl=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2u1kcob-sQ0/TIDQwJ1V7HI/AAAAAAAAAcU/vL1zoVGFzis/s1600/geocentric.gif&w=168&h=230&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=171&vpy=167&dur=469&hovh=184&hovw=134&tx=70&ty=97&sig=110339042596991037901&page=1&tbnh=142&tbnw=104&start=0&ndsp=17&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:101http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nikolaus_Kopernikus.jpghttp://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=JlmF_PJgQW0RqM:&imgrefurl=http://thewallmachine.com/CFYerj.html&docid=4fjr-vMHgVJ5VM&imgurl=http://thewallmachine.com/files/1354685726.jpg&w=200&h=200&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=818&vpy=128&dur=563&hovh=160&hovw=160&tx=93&ty=91&sig=110339042596991037901&page=2&tbnh=144&tbnw=144&start=17&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:22,s:0,i:170http://www.google.com/imgres?q=geocentric+theory&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=Vv0INXhvSDpvnM:&imgrefurl=http://countinfinity.blogspot.com/2010/09/ptolemys-theory.html&docid=eAYyk3Vx05_teM&imgurl=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2u1kcob-sQ0/TIDQwJ1V7HI/AAAAAAAAAcU/vL1zoVGFzis/s1600/geocentric.gif&w=168&h=230&ei=ttj5UImLAarM2AXg8oHwBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=171&vpy=167&dur=469&hovh=184&hovw=134&tx=70&ty=97&sig=110339042596991037901&page=1&tbnh=142&tbnw=104&start=0&ndsp=17&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0,i:101http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nikolaus_Kopernikus.jpg -
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
8/25
Result: relativistic measurements = measuring the motion of one object (planet) around
another object (Sun/center of Universe) from a third Place (Earth) or Kepler's ellipse
Page 8
Aphelion = a (1+ )
Perihelion = a (1 - )
Earth
Sun
Aphelion = a (1+ )
Perihelion = a (1 - )
Moon
Earth
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
9/25
1 -Nicolaus Copernicus: Planets revolve around the Sun in circles
2 -Astrologer Kepler said Planets revolve around the Sun in an ellipse
a
Page 9
r
Aphelion = a (1+ )
Perihelion = a (1 - )
P
Sun
Sun
P
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=kepler+law+images+planet&start=122&hl=en&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=579&tbm=isch&tbnid=25XaeqhFqp0CNM:&imgrefurl=http://mail.colonial.net/~hkaiter/Rotation_Revolution.html&docid=sWwiF__d0om_LM&imgurl=http://mail.colonial.net/~hkaiter/aa_newest_images/keplerplanets.jpg&w=649&h=313&ei=VB5-UMKwJqagywHp24CYDQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=623&vpy=132&dur=4078&hovh=156&hovw=323&tx=171&ty=91&sig=113643158351414815765&page=7&tbnh=75&tbnw=155&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:10,s:122,i:176http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nikolaus_Kopernikus.jpghttp://www.google.com/imgres?q=kepler+law+images+planet&start=122&hl=en&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=579&tbm=isch&tbnid=25XaeqhFqp0CNM:&imgrefurl=http://mail.colonial.net/~hkaiter/Rotation_Revolution.html&docid=sWwiF__d0om_LM&imgurl=http://mail.colonial.net/~hkaiter/aa_newest_images/keplerplanets.jpg&w=649&h=313&ei=VB5-UMKwJqagywHp24CYDQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=623&vpy=132&dur=4078&hovh=156&hovw=323&tx=171&ty=91&sig=113643158351414815765&page=7&tbnh=75&tbnw=155&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:10,s:122,i:176http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nikolaus_Kopernikus.jpg -
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
10/25
Newton's said the reason Planets revolve around the Sun is due action at a distance
or gravityexpressed by Newton's gravitational equation: F = - G m M/r2; r > 0
Where m = a planet mass; M = Sun mass; r = distance between the Sun and Planet and
G = a constant number = gravitational constant = 6.67384 x 10-11
Action at a distance: Sun swinging Earth around!
Or, r = a (1 - 2)/ (1 + cosine ); definition of an ellipse -------- I Newton's solution
Le Verrier said the ellipse axis rotates and the rate of rotation is 43 seconds of an arc per century
Page 10
Sun
Earth
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=newton%27s+gravitational+law+images&start=149&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=ai2qdRgS4s47hM:&imgrefurl=http://www.oswego.edu/~kanbur/a100/lecture15.html&docid=XLHZHslXKtpnIM&imgurl=http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/Images/mercury.jpeg&w=640&h=344&ei=0kzmUOGJK8OZqQHLiYGgAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=519&vpy=31&dur=2953&hovh=164&hovw=306&tx=82&ty=102&sig=104428760899374249497&page=8&tbnh=125&tbnw=241&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:52,s:100,i:160http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Le+Verrier+images&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=dhptHn4eRwcjHM:&imgrefurl=http://startswithabang.com/?p=1815&docid=sGVNNukc6qP_7M&imgurl=http://startswithabang.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/s_leverrier.jpg&w=400&h=604&ei=-kfmUPCXEIe2qAGq_4GwAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=750&vpy=28&dur=2172&hovh=276&hovw=183&tx=88&ty=149&sig=104428760899374249497&page=1&tbnh=123&tbnw=81&start=0&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0,i:108http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GodfreyKneller-IsaacNewton-1689.jpghttp://www.google.com/imgres?q=newton%27s+gravitational+law+images&start=149&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=ai2qdRgS4s47hM:&imgrefurl=http://www.oswego.edu/~kanbur/a100/lecture15.html&docid=XLHZHslXKtpnIM&imgurl=http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/Images/mercury.jpeg&w=640&h=344&ei=0kzmUOGJK8OZqQHLiYGgAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=519&vpy=31&dur=2953&hovh=164&hovw=306&tx=82&ty=102&sig=104428760899374249497&page=8&tbnh=125&tbnw=241&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:52,s:100,i:160http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Le+Verrier+images&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=dhptHn4eRwcjHM:&imgrefurl=http://startswithabang.com/?p=1815&docid=sGVNNukc6qP_7M&imgurl=http://startswithabang.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/s_leverrier.jpg&w=400&h=604&ei=-kfmUPCXEIe2qAGq_4GwAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=750&vpy=28&dur=2172&hovh=276&hovw=183&tx=88&ty=149&sig=104428760899374249497&page=1&tbnh=123&tbnw=81&start=0&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0,i:108http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GodfreyKneller-IsaacNewton-1689.jpghttp://www.google.com/imgres?q=newton%27s+gravitational+law+images&start=149&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=ai2qdRgS4s47hM:&imgrefurl=http://www.oswego.edu/~kanbur/a100/lecture15.html&docid=XLHZHslXKtpnIM&imgurl=http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/Images/mercury.jpeg&w=640&h=344&ei=0kzmUOGJK8OZqQHLiYGgAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=519&vpy=31&dur=2953&hovh=164&hovw=306&tx=82&ty=102&sig=104428760899374249497&page=8&tbnh=125&tbnw=241&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:52,s:100,i:160http://www.google.com/imgres?q=Le+Verrier+images&hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&tbnid=dhptHn4eRwcjHM:&imgrefurl=http://startswithabang.com/?p=1815&docid=sGVNNukc6qP_7M&imgurl=http://startswithabang.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/s_leverrier.jpg&w=400&h=604&ei=-kfmUPCXEIe2qAGq_4GwAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=750&vpy=28&dur=2172&hovh=276&hovw=183&tx=88&ty=149&sig=104428760899374249497&page=1&tbnh=123&tbnw=81&start=0&ndsp=24&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0,i:108http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GodfreyKneller-IsaacNewton-1689.jpg -
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
11/25
Einstein said to have a different look at space and time.
Sand up = sand down
Space = velocity x time
Space (sand up) = velocity x time (sand down)
If velocity is constantc
Then; Space = c x time
If you can travel in space, then you can travel in time but at a different rate
Nature is space - time and not just space analyzed by time
Planet Mercurytravel in space 70.75 arc seconds per century
Also planet Mercurytravel in time 43 arc seconds per century
For that reason a time force in space formshould be added to Newton's force equation
Einstein's added a time force to Newton's space force and modified Newton's equation:
Newton's space force equation: F = - G m M/r2gives an ellipse
Einstein's space - time force equation: F = - G m M/r2 + k1/ r4
The solution to this equation: r = a (1 - 2)/ [1 + cosine ( - ) gives a rotating ellipse
Page 11
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=sand+clock&hl=en&sa=X&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnsa&tbnid=mEXxe-lOJpKn4M:&imgrefurl=http://www.bazaardesigns.com/7277-gold-sand-glass-clock/&docid=oukolkn4PeH_ZM&imgurl=http://www.bazaardesigns.com/wp-content/uploads/gold-sand-glass-clock1.jpg&w=423&h=673&ei=BnCUUI_tIumGyAG19oGoBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=496&vpy=2&dur=454&hovh=283&hovw=178&tx=115&ty=159&sig=100619167796450835331&page=1&tbnh=170&tbnw=88&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:3,s:0,i:148http://www.google.com/imgres?q=sand+clock&hl=en&sa=X&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=575&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnsa&tbnid=mEXxe-lOJpKn4M:&imgrefurl=http://www.bazaardesigns.com/7277-gold-sand-glass-clock/&docid=oukolkn4PeH_ZM&imgurl=http://www.bazaardesigns.com/wp-content/uploads/gold-sand-glass-clock1.jpg&w=423&h=673&ei=BnCUUI_tIumGyAG19oGoBg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=496&vpy=2&dur=454&hovh=283&hovw=178&tx=115&ty=159&sig=100619167796450835331&page=1&tbnh=170&tbnw=88&start=0&ndsp=11&ved=1t:429,r:3,s:0,i:148 -
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
12/25
It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for it:
= {6 G M/a c (1 - )} [180/ ] [36526/T (days)] [3600]
G = 6.67384 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant
M = 2x1030kg = mass of the Sun
Eccentricity of Mercurys orbit = = 0.2056
T= 88 days = period of Planet mercurys rotation around the Sun
And c = 299792.458 km/sec =light speed/sec
And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit
= {6() 6.67384 x 10-11 (2 x 1030)/58.2 x 106 (299792.458) x
[1 (0.2056)]} x [180/ ] [36526/88] [3600] = 43 seconds of an arc per century.
In Short: Einstein added a time force in space form k1/ r4
Newton's force space equation: F = - G m M/r2
Newton's Ellipse r = a (1 - 2)/ (1 + cosine )
Einstein's force space - time equation: F = - G m M/r2 + k1/ r4
Einstein's rotating ellipse:r = a (1 - 2)/ [1 + cosine (- )
= {6 G M/a c (1 - )} [180/ ] [36526/T (days)] [3600] = 43 arc seconds per century
Newton's - space ----------------Nobel - Einstein's space - time
Compared to Planet Moon and Plant Mercury and Planet Venus are Bums?
It is very simple solution!
Page 12
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=kepler+law+images+planet&hl=en&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=579&tbm=isch&tbnid=qyR3RQfWUpuILM:&imgrefurl=http://schools.wikia.com/wiki/Newton%27s_Law_of_Universal_Gravitation&docid=vhb859GpzDpeYM&imgurl=http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060609040012/schools/images/b/b5/Kepler%27s_first_law.jpg&w=528&h=332&ei=-Rt-UPqTKeacyQHk5oCwAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=444&vpy=100&dur=7859&hovh=178&hovw=283&tx=140&ty=107&sig=113643158351414815765&page=1&tbnh=95&tbnw=151&start=0&ndsp=17&ved=1t:429,r:9,s:0,i:98http://www.google.com/imgres?q=kepler+law+images+planet&hl=en&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4RNRN_enUS418US419&biw=1024&bih=579&tbm=isch&tbnid=qyR3RQfWUpuILM:&imgrefurl=http://schools.wikia.com/wiki/Newton%27s_Law_of_Universal_Gravitation&docid=vhb859GpzDpeYM&imgurl=http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060609040012/schools/images/b/b5/Kepler%27s_first_law.jpg&w=528&h=332&ei=-Rt-UPqTKeacyQHk5oCwAQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=444&vpy=100&dur=7859&hovh=178&hovw=283&tx=140&ty=107&sig=113643158351414815765&page=1&tbnh=95&tbnw=151&start=0&ndsp=17&ved=1t:429,r:9,s:0,i:98 -
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
13/25
Earth's physical reality
27.321 days
- a
Sun's physical reality
365.256 days
- a
Page 13
r0
E
Center
r0
S
Center
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
14/25
Modern + Nobel Prize winner physics Universe
Real time hacking of nature
Sun circle motion in365.256 days period and Earth circle motion in 27.321
days period. To start with:
Page 14
Earth
365.256 days
Sun
Moon
27.321
days
Mercury
87.96 days
Venus
224.68days
Venus
Bum
Sun
Earth
Moon
Bum
Mercury
Bum
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
15/25
Two circles not in Synchronous relative motion is a Kepler visual ellipse
Astrologer Kepler said Planets revolve around the Sun in anellipse
Western civilization 500 years assertion is Kepler's ellipse
a
Joe Nahhas Vs western civilization
365.256 days period 27.321 days period
Page 15
r
Aphelion = a (1+ )
Perihelion = a (1 - )
P
Sun
Venus
Bum
Sun
Earth
Bum
Mercury
Bum
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
16/25
How Joe Nahhas can explain the periods of the three bum planets?
365.256 days period 27.321 days period
From (2) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 t--------------------------------------- (3)
From (1) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2( t/2)---------------------------------- (4)
The artifact ratio 0.607500428
From (2) 0.607500428 = T x -T0/ T0 = - 2 sine 2 t
And the value t = 33.44494011 degrees; tan t = tan 33.44494011 = 0.660504466
The period of planet Mercury is the Sun's period of 365.256 days divided by 2 tan ttimes the square of air index of refraction because Kepler's formula is use to determine
the planetary periods and it is calculated are square
The artifacts period of planet Mercury around the Sun:
Is: (365.256 na2/2 tan t) = (365.256 x 1.0002932/2 0.660504466)
= 87.96041554 days
Page 16
Venus
224.68
days
Sun
Earth
Moon
27.321
days
Mercury
87.960
days
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
17/25
Planet Mercury is a bum: Artifacts circularization period of planet Mercury = 87.96 days
Planet Venus is a bum: Artifacts circularization period of planet Mercury = 224.86 days
When the Sun moves Planet Mercury and Venus appear like they are moving in motion
(Planet Mercury) and in retrograde motion (Venus) when Mercury and Venus are bums.
Planet Venus artifact period calculations:
A - 365.256/2 tan t = 88.0119679 days
B - The artifacts is 0.607500428; retrograde artifacts is (1 - 0.607500428) = 0.392499572
And (88.0119679/0.392499572) = 224.2345574 days
C - Time scale (Solar time/ Sidereal time) = (86400/96164.09943) = 1.002737806
D - Artifact of index of refraction: 1 + (1 - n a) sine t = 1.000161
Venus artifacts period: (224.2345574) (1.000161/1.002737806) = 224.6804828 days
Page 17
Mercury
Venus
Sun
Earth
Sun
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
18/25
Ole Roemer's hypothesis
From (2) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 t--------------------------------------- (3)
From (1) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2( t/2)---------------------------------- (4)
A - Artifact 1 calculations:
I - (365.256/27.321) =13.39605677
II- 13.36905677 - 13 (complete cycles) = 0.36905677
III - Circular artifacts is the square root of 0.36905677 = 0.607500428
B - Artifact 2 calculations: (after six month/ Earth other side of the Sun)
I - [(365.256/27.321)/2] =13.39605677/2 = 6.684528385
II- 6.684528385- 6 (complete cycles) = 0.684528385
III - Circular artifacts is the square root of 0.684528385 = 0.827362306
Orbital: From (2) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2 t------------------------------------ (3)
A -Artifact 1; t = 33.44494011 degrees
B -Artifact 2; t = 40.02939213 degrees
Line: From (1) T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2( t/2)---------------------------------- (4)
T = T x -T0 = - 2 T0 sine 2( t/2); T0=1.769137788 days
Page 18
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://sepetjian.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/roemer0011.jpg&imgrefurl=http://sepetjian.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/olaf-roemer-the-objectivity-of-science/&h=400&w=298&sz=29&tbnid=K_pt0pWbF4TFNM:&tbnh=94&tbnw=70&prev=/search?q=romer+light+speed+images&tbm=isch&tbo=u&zoom=1&q=romer+light+speed+images&usg=__9PBNKmtDqrIyOZyyznBLPGLGAmM=&docid=xM6VL6B1ji1-uM&sa=X&ei=xb03UoXQK9GQyQGBhIHAAg&ved=0CFkQ9QEwDg&dur=2469http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://sepetjian.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/roemer0011.jpg&imgrefurl=http://sepetjian.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/olaf-roemer-the-objectivity-of-science/&h=400&w=298&sz=29&tbnid=K_pt0pWbF4TFNM:&tbnh=94&tbnw=70&prev=/search?q=romer+light+speed+images&tbm=isch&tbo=u&zoom=1&q=romer+light+speed+images&usg=__9PBNKmtDqrIyOZyyznBLPGLGAmM=&docid=xM6VL6B1ji1-uM&sa=X&ei=xb03UoXQK9GQyQGBhIHAAg&ved=0CFkQ9QEwDg&dur=2469 -
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
19/25
T= - 2 T0 sine 2( t/2)
And t/2= [(40.02939213 degrees) - (33.44494011 degrees)]/2
= 3.29222601 degrees
T= - 2 T0 sine 2( t/2)
= - 2 T0 sine 2( t/2)
= (- 2 x 1.769137788 days) sine 2 (3.29222601 /2)
T= 0.011669377days
C - T= 0.011669377days
T = 0.011669377x (86400 second) = 1008. 234135 seconds
Compensating or dividing for the twice the time error squared using Kepler's law;
Kepler's law is given or calculated as T2or[(86400/86164.09943)2]2
Compensating or multiplying for the twice the air index of refraction error for two
measurements (1.000293)2
Compensating or multiplying once for the air index artifact of refraction error squared
for two measurements (1.000161)
T (measured artifact time)
= [(1008. 234135 seconds) (1.000293)2(1.000161)]/ [(86400/86164.09943)2]2
T (measured artifact time) = 998.0130372 seconds
Twice Earth - Sun distance = 2 x 1.49598 x 1011
Light artifact velocity C= 299792458
C T = [299792458 x 998.0130372]/2 = 1.4959839 x 1011
C T = artifact velocity x artifact time = 1.4959839 x 1011
The artifact ratio 0.607500428 comes from?
Earth moves in 27.321 days cycle and the Sun moves 365.256 days cycle!
Page 19
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
20/25
3 - Newton's equation solution as an expression of an artifact of 0.607500438
F = -G m M/r2; r > 0
Physics Faculty wrong solution of ellipse, r (, 0) = a (1 - 2)/ (1 + cosine )
Correct solution is a rotating ellipse, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] ( + ) t
Newton's equation in polar coordinates
F = m; = [r" - r '] r1+ [2 r' ' + r "] 1
With m (r" - r ')= - Gm M/r2 Eq-1
And 2 r' ' + r "= 0 Eq-2
I - Real numbers or time independent solution
Eq-2: 2 r' ' + r "= 0
Multiply by r> 0
Then 2 r r' ' + r2"= 0
Or, d (r')/d t = 0
And integrating: r' = h = constant
With m (r" - r ')= - Gm M/r2
Then, (r" - r ')= - GM/r2
Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r' = h = /u
And r' = d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d ) (d / d t)
= (- /u ) (d u /d ) ' = (-'/u ) (d u /d ) = - h (d u/ d )
And r' = d r/d t = - h (d u/ d )
And r" = d r/ d t = d (d r'/ d t)/ d t
= d [- h (d u/ d )]/ d t
Multiply (d / d )
Then r" = d r/ d t = {d [- h (d u/ d )]/ d t} (d / d )
= ' {d [- h (d u/ d )]/ d }
Page 20
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
21/25
= - h (d u/ d )
= (- h/r) (d u/ d )
= - h u (d u/ d )
And r" = d r/ d t = - h u (d u/ d )
With d r/dt - r ' = - G M/r2 E q 1
And - h u (d u/ d ) (1/u) (h u) = - G M u2
Then (d u/ d ) + u = G M/h2
And u = G M/h2+ A cosine
The r = 1/u = 1/ (G M/h2+ A cosine ); divide by G M/h2
And r = (h2/G M)/ [1 + (A h2/G M) cosine ]
With; h2/G M = a (1 - 2); (A h2/G M) =
This is Newton's equation classical solution
Or, r = a (1 - 2)/ (1 + cosine ); definition of an ellipse ------------- I
Newton's time independent solution
II - Real time or complex numbers solution :
Newton's equation in polar coordinates
F = m; = [r" - r '] r1+ [2 r' ' + r "] 1
With m (r" - r ')= - Gm M/r2 Eq-1
And 2 r' ' + r "= 0 Eq-2
Eq-2: 2 r' ' + r "= 0
Separate the variables: 2 r' ' = - r "
Or 2(r'/r) = - ("/') = - 2 ( + )
Then: (r'/r) = +
Or d r/r = ( + ) d t
Then r = r 0(+ )t
Page 21
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
22/25
And r = r (, 0) r (0, t); r 0= r (, 0)
And r = r (, 0) (+ )t
And r (0, t) = (+ )t
With r (, 0) = a (1 - 2)/ (1 + cosine )
Then, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] (+ )t ------------- I
Newton's time dependent solution = quantum mechanics
If time is frozen that is t = 0
Then r (, 0) = a (1-)/ (1+ cosine ) or classical
Relativistic is the difference between I and Real II
With - ("/') = - 2 ( + )
Then ' = '0 -2 (+ )t
With '0 = h/[r (, 0)] 2
And '(, t) = [' (, 0)] -2(+ )t
And, '(, t) = ' (, 0) ' (0, t)
And ' (0, t) = ' (0, 0) -2(+ )t
At Perihelion:
We Have ' (0, 0) = h (0, 0)/r (0, 0) = 2ab/ 0 a (1- ) ;0 = orbital period
= 2a [ (1- )]/0a (1- ) ]
= 2[ (1- )]/0 (1- ) ]
Then '(0, t) = 2 [(1- )/ 0 (1- ) ] -2(+ )t
With = 0
Then '(0, t) = 2 [(1-)/ 0 (1-) ] -2(+ )t
= 2 [(1-)/ 0 (1- ) ] (cosine 2 t - sine 2 t)
Page 22
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
23/25
Real '(0, t) = 2 [(1- )/ 0 (1-) ] cosine 2 t
Real '(0, t) = 2 [(1-)/ 0 (1-) ] (1 - 2sine t)
Naming ' = '(0, t); '0 = 2 [(1-)/ 0 (1-) ]
Then ' = 2 [(1- )/ 0 (1- ) ] (1 - 2 sine t)
And ' = '0 (1 - 2 sine t)
And ' - '0 = - 2 '0 sine t = -2{2 [(1-)/ 0 (1-) ]} sine t
And ' - '0 = -4 [(1-)/0 (1-) ] sine t
With, v = spin velocity; v0 = orbital velocity; 0 = orbital period
And 0= tan-1 [(v + v0)/c]; light aberrations
' = ' - '0 = - 4 [(1-)]/0 (1-) ] sine tan-1 [(v + v0)/c] radians per0
In degrees per period is multiplication by 180/
' = (-720) [(1-)/0 (1-) ] sine tan-1 [(v + v0)/c]
The angle difference in degrees per period is: = ( ') 0
= (-720) [(1-)/(1-) ] sine tan-1 [(v + v0)/c] calculated in degrees per century is
multiplication = 100 ;= Earth orbital period = 100 x 365.26 =36526 days and dividing byusing 0 in days: (100 /0)= in degrees per century
= (-72000 /0) [(1-)/ (1-) ] sine tan-1 [(v + v0)/c]
In arc second per century is multiplying by 3600
= - 3600 x 720 (100 /0) [(1-)/ (1-) ] x Sine tan-1 [(v + v0)/c]
Approximations I
With v
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
24/25
Approximations II
The circumference of an ellipse
Is: 2 a (1 - /4 + 3/16()- --.) 2 a (1- /4); r0 = a (1- /4)
From Newton's laws for a circular orbit:
F = [M/m F = - Gm M/r02 = m v0/ r0
Then v0 = GM/ r0; for planet Mercury
And v0= [GM/ r] = [GM/a (1-/4)]
G = 6.673 x 10 -11; M = 2 x1030 kg; a = 58.2 x 109meters; = 0.206
Then v0 = [6.673 x 10 -11 x 2 x1030 /58.2 x 109 (1- 0.206 /4)]
And v0 = 48.14 km/sec [Mercury]; c = 300,000
(Calculated in arc second per century)
= (-720x36526x3600/0days) [(1-)/ (1-) ] [(v + v0)/c]
With = 0.206; [(1-)/ (1-) ] = 1.552; v = 3 meters per second
= (-720x36526x3600/88) 1.552 (48.143/300,000)
= 43 arc second per century
Summary
= (-720x36526x3600/0days) [(1-)/ (1-) ] [(v + v0)/c]
= (-720x36526x3600/88) 1.552 (48.143/300,000)
= 43 arc second per century
Page 24
-
7/29/2019 Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistake
25/25
Or, r = a (1 - 2)/ (1 + cosine ); definition of an ellipse
Rotating ellipse, r (, t) = [a (1-)/ (1+ cosine )] ( + ) t ------------- I
Sun - Mercury Period in seconds = 87.96 days x 24 hours x 60 minutes x 60 seconds
Planet Mercury angular velocity around the Sun
Is 0'= 2 x /88 x 24 x 60 x 60 radians per period
Planet Mercury angular velocity around the Sun in arc second per century 0'
= (2 x /87.96 x 24 x 60 x 60) (180/) (36525.6/87.96) (3600)
= 70.81384506 arc sec per century.
If C = 0' = 70.81384506 arc sec per century measured from the Sun
And 70.81384506 x 0.607500428 = 43 arc sec per century
Modern + Nobel physics is based on time travel and time travel is wrong use of clock!
I am not only saying Nobel is wrong but what I can prove is modern + Nobel = wrong
All Rights reserved
Page 25