on being difficult… tim rich - ynu.org.uk ynu 2016... · scale of the resource number of...
TRANSCRIPT
• Bored of the usual flowers and seen everything locally?
• Writing a county flora?
• Want to find new species and see things nobody else has seen?
• Want to pretend you are a credible botanist?
• …then difficult plants are for you!
We have a problem:
•There are lots of difficult plants
•There are very few botanists able to identify them
Consequently, distribution data (and therefore conservation
data) are incomplete, out of date and not comparable with
other plant data
Hieracium umbellatum
Common, easily identified, yet high proportion of
old records
Why may plants be difficult to identify?
Sometimes to do with plants
• Taxonomic problems (e.g. scurvygrasses -Cochlearia)
• Hybridisation (e.g. willows - Salix)
• Morphological reduction (e.g. glassworts - Salicornia)
• Modification by environment (e.g. brambles - Rubus)
• Some taxa can only be identified at specific times of year (e.g. dandelions -Taraxacum)
• Some taxa reproduce apomictically resulting in a large number of closely related, clonal forms (e.g. Sea lavenders - Limonium).
Sometimes to do with botanists and resources
• May simply not have been studied enough
• Information available to help identify them may not be adequate
Scale of the problem
Major genus No. native taxa No. endemics Apomicts
Alchemilla 12 1 Yes
Euphrasia 21 9
Hieracium c. 430 250+ Yes
Limonium 14 7 Yes
Rosa 12 0
Rubus c. 325 c. 210 Yes
Salicornia 7 0
Sorbus 48 45 Yes
Taraxacum c. 245 41 Yes
Ulmus (70+) ?
Ranunc. auricomus (100+) ? Yes
‘Normal’ species 1470 10
Totals UK c. 2700 c. 541
~54% UK flora ‘difficult’
Scale of the resource
Number of specialists in major UK critical genera.
Critical group No. Specialists
Alchemilla 3 Bradshaw, Lynes, Roberts
Euphrasia 2 Metherall, Silverside
Hieracium 4 Jones, McCosh, Rich, Scott, Tennant
Limonium 2 Boorman, Ingrouille
Rosa 2 Ballantyne, Maskew
Rubus 7 Allen, Ballantyne, Bull, Earl, Newton, Porter, Randall
Salicornia 2 Dalby, Ferguson
Sorbus 3 Houston, McAllister, Rich
Taraxacum 3 Richards, Reid, Porter
Ulmus 3 Armstrong, Coleman
Ranun.auricomus 1 Leslie
Dactylorhiza ~ as many as there are botanists…!
• Note only 8/35 ‘professionals’ (of which 6 retired)
Dave Earl, 1987
• Majority of difficult plants are apomicts (i.e. reproduce
clonally) in relatively few genera
• Apomicts often regarded as not equivalent to ‘ordinary
species’ – and hence not worth bothering with, but …
• Apomicts differ morphologically
H. neomarginatum
Small alpine with
basal rosette
H. strictiforme
Tall leafy species of
riverbanks
H. asteridiophyllum H. cillense
e.g. Distribution of hawkweed
endemics at Craig y Cilau
• Differ ecologically
Group D Sorbus aria (Ireland)
Group F Sorbus cf aria (Ireland)
Group E Sorbus porrigenti formis (Britain)
Sorbus aria (England)
Sorbus aria (England)
Sorbus aria (France)
Sorbus porrigenti formis 'Bristol form'
0.01 changes
Group C Sorbus eminens
Group B Menai Strait
Group A Sorbus hibernica
•Differ genetically,
cytologically and
biochemically
DNA tree of Sorbus
hibernica and related taxa
(AFLP)
• Have distinct distributions
S&M 16. Hieracium strictiforme (Zahn) RoffeyS&M 23. Hieracium tavense (Ley) Ley
Hieracium tavense Hieracium strictiforme
Are apomicts worth recognising?
YES!
• Apomicts from a major part of our flora
• Recognisable morphologically
• Behave as species differing in biology, ecology, etc.
• Complete reproductive spectrum from outbreeders
(eg Geum) to in-breeders (eg Capsella) to apomicts
(eg Sorbus)
• But to identify difficult plants, we need resources
•Naming vouchers
•Training courses (eg Taraxacum workshop)
•Providing accessible literature
Resources: experts
Resources: herbaria
Advantages
• Identification can be checked
• comparative material
• may have unique information
Disadvantages
• few computerised catalogues available
• may not be revised and up-to-date taxonomy
• pressed plants may not look like those in the field
• costs to travel, may not be close, not open at
weekends
To do difficult plants, need own herbarium
•space, time, cost, pests
Resources: literature
• monographs (e.g. P. D. Sell Hieracium)
• atlases (e.g. Rubus Atlas)
• county floras/atlases (variable)
• journals (Watsonia, BEC reports etc.)
• bibliographies (Simpson, BSBI database)
• BSBI literature database
But expensive, some hard to trace, may end up
with electronic copies only
Resources: databases
• Specialist databases best, eg Hieracium, Rubus,
Taraxacum
• BSBI Big Database (but so many duplicates and …)
• Give a start, what is known, what else is likely to be here
• But cannot check identification, may be out-of-date, lots
of errors (and often compounded errors)
Case study - How to take on a difficult plant:
Hieracium mirandum – Remote Hawkweed
(You don’t need to know all to know one)
1. Collate existing knowledge
2. Field survey
3. Revise/review information
4. Write it up!
Hieracium mirandum – Remote Hawkweed
First described Sell & West (1968) from Yorkshire
Type specimen 6 sites
•distinctive species with 3-7, elliptic, nearly
untoothed stem leaves, the lower petiolate and the
upper semi-clasping.
Tarn Beck, Cumbria 1969-2013
Gearstones, Ribblehead1902-2008 † Stean, Yorkshire 1962 †
Newbiggin-on-Lune, Cumbria 1985 †
Also gone from Masson Hill, Derbyshire and Orton, Cumbria
2008 status: 2/6 sites, total 14 plants
Journal paper Book
2013 status: 1/6 sites, 1 plant
Advice for difficult plants
• Have clear idea of what you want to do (learn them all, learn
some, ‘stamp collect’ for flora)
• Go on a field training course to learn how to interpret
characters
• Prepare in advance from many different sources
• Get to know a few local taxa and build up knowledge over time
• Do it properly - collect plants, take photographs, make notes,
revise and review, and document
• Don’t expect quick returns, but the long haul will be worth it;
you can make a difference