Upload File

on-demand cities...3.0 1960-2008 ecological footprint 2.5 2008-2050, scenarios moderate...

  • Home
  • Documents
  • On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
37
On-Demand Cities Thomas Fisher Dayton Hudson Chair in Urban Design Director, Metropolitan Design Center University of Minnesota

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

On-Demand Cities

Thomas Fisher

Dayton Hudson Chair in Urban Design

Director, Metropolitan Design Center

University of Minnesota

Page 2: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 3: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 4: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 5: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 6: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 7: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 8: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 9: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 10: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 11: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 12: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 13: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 14: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 15: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 16: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 17: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 18: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 19: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 20: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 21: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 22: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

First Industrial Revolution

Page 23: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 24: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Second Industrial Revolution

Page 25: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 26: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Third Industrial Revolution

Page 27: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 28: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Solidarity Economy

Page 29: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 30: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Community Wealth Economy

Page 31: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 32: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Access Economy

Page 33: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 34: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Sharing Economy Cities

Page 35: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Page 36: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

GeoDesigning our Future

Page 37: On-Demand Cities...3.0 1960-2008 Ecological Footprint 2.5 2008-2050, Scenarios Moderate business-as-usual Rapid reduction 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

static-content.springer.com10.1186... · 2018-04-16 · 1 Chroococcidiopsis sp. ATCC 27900 2.3% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

A210 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS · oh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

SITE PHOTOMECTRIC PLAN E-1 · 2018. 10. 17. · 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Datos Históricos Pronóstico Estacional - Nuevo León · galeana galeana 726.5 0.0 0.0 15.0 san rafael galeana 470.7 0.0 0.0 21.5 dr. arroyo dr. arroyo 498.2 0.0 0.0 14.3 mier y

A quantitative description of the Chinese economy, 1960-2004 · 2014. 6. 30. · 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 Birth

Check Out Report - s3.amazonaws.com€¦ · Front Garden 0.0 ° , 0.0 ° 23/08/2016 0.0 ° , 0.0 ° 23/08/2016 0.0 ° , 0.0 ° 23/08/2016 Notes: Front garden has hot a few weeds,

Adverse reactions and adverse events in Italian blood donors - Dr Marano.pdf · Haemolisis 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 Nerve injury due to a haematoma 2 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 Tightness in the chest 3

Hato - SEEKRIEG526 kts 30 dp 1.00 damage control (dcr) 1 armor 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1h deck 2h turret 3h superstr 4v con 5v belt mid 6v belt end 8v turret 7v barbette

1960-2008 Our Fashion & Politics Zine

SPANISH - Miami DDA€¦ · NEW YORK 4.0 - 8.9 2.9 - 3.6 7.1 8.85 4.0 4.5 LOS ANGELES 1.0 - 9.55 0.0 8.84 0.0 8.25 1.5 CHICAGO 5.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 6.25 3.0 HOUSTON 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 6.25

Health Insurance Coverage 2015 1. 2007 Premium Increase - 16% 2008 Premium Increase - 0.0% 2009 Premium Increase - 0.0% 2010 Premium Increase - 2.0% 2011

KACARDCFHDA - Kogan Full HD Dash Camera Video Recorder · 1/4 General Setup lfienu . 60Hz 0.0 verage 0.0 EV .Fine 0.0 EV . ZZZ . 0.0 EV AE bias 0.0 EV / 21 19 0.0 EV AE bias 0.0 EV

[2008] Sara Facio: Antológica (1960-2005)

APPENDIX J UTILITY ACCESS POINT SURVEY PLAN AND RESULTS€¦ · 11 Water meter 0.0 12 Telstra 0.2 13 Telstra 0.0 14 SA Gas 0.0 15 Stormwater 0.0 16 Water mains 0.0 17 Telstra 0.0

Legislative Finance Division · FY2006 CIP Receipts for Motor Fuel Tax Auditor RSA FndChg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 The Tax Division enters into an annual reimbursable

United Nations - Read the Docs€¦ · Web view76 0.0 123 21.5 170 44.4 30 4.0 77 0.0 124 23.5 171 44.3 31 0.0 78 0.0 125 25.0 172 44.2 32 0.0 79 0.0 126 26.8 173 44.1 33 0.0 80 0.0

State of Arizona Budget Request€¦ · APF Subaccount - Department of Financial Institutions FUN 0.0 0.0 0.0 APF Subaccount - Department of Environmental Quality FU 0.0 0.0 0.0 APF

What is your Customary and Reasonable fee for a 1004 ... · Killeen -Temple -Fort Hood, TX MSA 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 9.1% (1) 0.0% (0) 63.6% (7) 27.3% (3) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 0.0%

DS-brochure-2019 · 2020. 6. 12. · 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Overall Accura 92.13% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 96.3% 0.0% 96.6% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% . Title: DS-brochure-2019

Change Record Detail - Multiple Scenarios With ... · Transfer PFT Adm Clk II (PCN 12-?045/12-3008) from R&I to FWP Enf/ISU-ADN 1240071 Trin 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100 A vacant,

Fannie Mae 2013 Progress Report · 2020. 5. 7. · 2012 1Q13 $0.0 $0.0 2Q13 4Q13 $0.0 $0.0 3Q13 TBD 1Q14 Dividend Payment to Treasury (in billions) $8.6 4Q13 $7.2 1Q142 $0.03 2008

KACARDCFHDA - Kogan Full HD Dash Camera Video Recorder · 1/4 General Setup Menu 0.0 . 60Hz 0.0 EV verage 0.0 EV .Fine . 0.0 EV AE bias 0.0 EV / 21 19 0.0 EV AE bias 0.0 EV . Playback

Tasti D-Lite Nutritional Statement · Banana Greek Frozen Yogurt - Vanilla 1oz 28.0 g 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 6.0 0.0 5.0 1.0 Banana Greek Frozen Yogurt - Vanilla 3oz 85.0 g

- Wisconsin Scholastic Chess Federation · WEBER, MADDIE RUIZ NUNEZ, MAXIMILIAN In Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out Out 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 1586 435 415 10 9 6 12 12

auxilium-fundacja.org.plauxilium-fundacja.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ScaloneDokum… · 51675.8 51675.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 51675.8 263.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 263.4 0.0

Legislative Finance Division · FY2007 Direct appropriation of federal impact aid and Public Inc 32,749.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32,749.0 0.0 0 0 0 School Trust Fund 1043 Impact Aid

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.0 Haddy DE Show Stables ... Stepping Stone Farm Cari Gleeson 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.0 So Money AJ Roller Maggie Brink 12.0 30.0 0.0 0.0

Simple tools for assessing the value of nature · Hard surfaces 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Land-cover score matrix

w g kiu ANNUALREPORTANDACCOUNTS 2008 |09 ny gsa hnd as … · Plantandmachinery 13.8 1.4 0.0 Informationtechnology(IT) 9.3 0.0 0.0 Softwarelicencesetc 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total 72.3 1.4 0.0

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA–LINCOLN INSTITUTIONAL …Studies 1/-- -- -- 0 0.0 0 0.0 -- -- -- 0 0.0 0 0.0 56 3 -- -56 0.0 -3 0.0 56 3 0 -56 0.0 -3 0.0 Journalism & Mass Communications

Legislative Finance Divisionlegfin.akleg.gov/BudgetAnalysisTools/LY2017/DOR... · FY2013 Replace Interagency Receipts with CIP Receipts FndChg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0

 · 4/24/2020  · 0.1 3"ei 0.0 0.0 wood fence woo fence post & rail fence existing contour proposed contour proposed elevation lmu 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 mon. found 0.0

B&H ENGINEERS · 2020. 3. 7. · 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RiskPremiumShocksCanCreate InefficientRecessionssditella/Papers/Risk_premium_business_cycles.pdf1940 1960 1980 2000 - 0.4 - 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Figure 1: HP-filtered annualized

PRODUCT SPECIFICATION SHEET - Cole-Parmer · product specification sheet overview dc1010 (1/16 din) ... 0.0~200.0 °c 0.0~400.0 °c 0.0~600.0 °c 0.0~392.0 °f 0.0~752.0 °f 0.0~1112.0