on the cusp: stop bsi the science of improving patient safety
DESCRIPTION
On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving Patient Safety. Learning Objectives. To understand that every system is designed to achieve the results it get To know the basic principles of safe design of both technical and teamwork To understand how teams make wise decisions. Slide 2. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
On the CUSP: STOP BSIOn the CUSP: STOP BSIThe Science of Improving Patient The Science of Improving Patient
SafetySafety
Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives
• To understand that every system is designed to achieve the results it get
• To know the basic principles of safe design of both technical and teamwork
• To understand how teams make wise decisions
Slide 2
The Problem is Large The Problem is Large
• In U.S. Healthcare system
– 7% of patients suffer a medication error
– Every patients admitted to an ICU suffer adverse event
– 44,000- 98,000 deaths
– Nearly 100,000 deaths from HAI
– Approximately 30,000 deaths from CLABSI
– $50 billion in total costs
• Similar results in UK and Australia
Kohn To err is human
Slide 4
10.5Alcohol dependence
22.8Hip fracture
40.7Urinary tract infection
45.2Headaches
45.4Diabetes mellitus
48.6Hyperlipidemia
53.0Benign prostatic hyperplasia
53.5Asthma
53.9Colorectal cancer
57.2Orthopedic conditions
57.7Depression
64.7Hypertension
68.0Coronary artery disease
68.5Low back pain
Percentage of Recommended Care Received Condition
McGlynn et al, NEJM 2003; 348(26):2635-2645
Slide 5
RAND Study Confirms Continued Quality GapRAND Study Confirms Continued Quality Gap
How Can This Happen?How Can This Happen?
Need to view the delivery of healthcare as a science
How Can We Improve?How Can We Improve?Understand the Science of SafetyUnderstand the Science of Safety
• Every system is perfectly designed to achieve the results it gets
• Understand principles of safe design – standardize, create checklists, learn when things go wrong
• Recognize these principles apply to technical and team work
• Teams make wise decision when there is diverse and independent input
Caregivers are not to blameCaregivers are not to blame
Slide 7
SystemSystem FailureFailure LeadingLeading toto ThisThis
ErrorError
Catheter pulled withPatient sitting
Communication betweenresident and nurse
Lack of protocol For catheter removal
Inadequate trainingand supervision
Pronovost Annals IM 2004; Reason
Patient suffers
Venous air embolism
Slide 8
System Factors Impact SafetySystem Factors Impact Safety
HospitalHospital
Departmental FactorsDepartmental Factors
Work EnvironmentWork Environment
Team FactorsTeam Factors
Individual ProviderIndividual Provider
Task FactorsTask Factors
Patient CharacteristicsPatient Characteristics
InstitutionalInstitutional
Adopted from VincentAdopted from Vincent
Slide 9
Slide 10
Evidence Regarding the Impact of ICU Evidence Regarding the Impact of ICU Organization on PerformanceOrganization on Performance
• Physicians
• Nurses
• Pharmacists
Pronovost JAMA 1999, 2002; Pronovost ECP 2001
Slide 11
Aviation Accidents Aviation Accidents per Million Departuresper Million Departures
Slide 12
Systems Systems
• Every system is designed to achieve the results it gets
• To improve performance we need to change systems
• Start with pilot test one patient, one day, one physician, one room
Slide 13
Principles of Safe DesignPrinciples of Safe Design
• Standardize – Eliminate steps if possible
• Create independent checks
• Learn when things go wrong– What happened– Why– What did you do to reduce risk– How do you know it worked
Slide 14
StandardizeStandardize
Slide 15
Line Cart Contents – 4 DrawersLine Cart Contents – 4 Drawers
Slide 16
Eliminate StepsEliminate Steps
Slide 17
Create Independent ChecksCreate Independent Checks
Slide 18
2 Year Results from 103 2 Year Results from 103 ICUsICUs
Time period Median CRBSI rate Incidence rate ratio
Baseline 2.7 1
Peri intervention 1.6 0.76
0-3 months 0 0.62
4-6 months 0 0.56
7-9 months 0 0.47
10-12 months 0 0.42
13-15 months 0 0.37
16-18 months 0 0.34
Pronovost NEJM 2006
Slide 19
Principles of Safe Design Apply to Principles of Safe Design Apply to Technical and TeamworkTechnical and Teamwork
Basic Components and Process of Basic Components and Process of CommunicationCommunication
Elizabeth Dayton, Joint Commission Journal, Jan. 2007
Slide 21
% o
f res
pond
ents
repo
rting
abo
ve a
dequ
ate
team
work
ICUSRS Data
ICU Physicians and ICU RN ICU Physicians and ICU RN CollaborationCollaboration
Slide 23
Teamwork ToolsTeamwork Tools
• Daily goals
• AM briefing
• Shadowing
Slide 24
Teams Make Wise Decisions When There Teams Make Wise Decisions When There is Diverse and Independent Inputis Diverse and Independent Input
• Wisdom of Crowds
• Alternate between convergent and divergent thinking– Get from OR to balcony
Slide 25
Slide 26
Don’t Play Man DownDon’t Play Man Down
When you feel something say When you feel something say somethingsomething
Slide 27
Action ItemsAction Items
• Pick one area and reflect on the systems that predict performance– Walk and observe the process
• Work to standardize one process such as central line cart
• Pilot test it
• Ensure all staff know the science for improving patient safety
Slide 28
ReferencesReferences
• Berwick DM. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ 1996;132:619-22.
• Langley G, Nolan K. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass Publishers 1996.
• Needham DM, Thompson DM, et al. A system factors analysis of airway events from the Intensive Care Unit Safety Reporting System (ICUSRS). Crit Care Med 2004;32:2227-33.
• Pronovost PJ, Wu Aw, et al. Acute decompensation after removing a central line: practical approaches to increasing safety in the intensive care unit. Ann Int Med 2004;140(12):1025-1033.
• Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, et al. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;288(17):2151-2162.
• Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2000.
Slide 30