on the cusp: stop bsi the science of improving patient safety

30
On the CUSP: STOP BSI On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving Patient The Science of Improving Patient Safety Safety

Upload: dean-contreras

Post on 01-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving Patient Safety. Learning Objectives. To understand that every system is designed to achieve the results it get To know the basic principles of safe design of both technical and teamwork To understand how teams make wise decisions. Slide 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

On the CUSP: STOP BSIOn the CUSP: STOP BSIThe Science of Improving Patient The Science of Improving Patient

SafetySafety

Page 2: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

• To understand that every system is designed to achieve the results it get

• To know the basic principles of safe design of both technical and teamwork

• To understand how teams make wise decisions

Slide 2

Page 3: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety
Page 4: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

The Problem is Large The Problem is Large

• In U.S. Healthcare system

– 7% of patients suffer a medication error

– Every patients admitted to an ICU suffer adverse event

– 44,000- 98,000 deaths

– Nearly 100,000 deaths from HAI

– Approximately 30,000 deaths from CLABSI

– $50 billion in total costs

• Similar results in UK and Australia

Kohn To err is human

Slide 4

Page 5: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

10.5Alcohol dependence

22.8Hip fracture

40.7Urinary tract infection

45.2Headaches

45.4Diabetes mellitus

48.6Hyperlipidemia

53.0Benign prostatic hyperplasia

53.5Asthma

53.9Colorectal cancer

57.2Orthopedic conditions

57.7Depression

64.7Hypertension

68.0Coronary artery disease

68.5Low back pain

Percentage of Recommended Care Received Condition

McGlynn et al, NEJM 2003; 348(26):2635-2645

Slide 5

RAND Study Confirms Continued Quality GapRAND Study Confirms Continued Quality Gap

Page 6: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

How Can This Happen?How Can This Happen?

Need to view the delivery of healthcare as a science

Page 7: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

How Can We Improve?How Can We Improve?Understand the Science of SafetyUnderstand the Science of Safety

• Every system is perfectly designed to achieve the results it gets

• Understand principles of safe design – standardize, create checklists, learn when things go wrong

• Recognize these principles apply to technical and team work

• Teams make wise decision when there is diverse and independent input

Caregivers are not to blameCaregivers are not to blame

Slide 7

Page 8: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

SystemSystem FailureFailure LeadingLeading toto ThisThis

ErrorError

Catheter pulled withPatient sitting

Communication betweenresident and nurse

Lack of protocol For catheter removal

Inadequate trainingand supervision

Pronovost Annals IM 2004; Reason

Patient suffers

Venous air embolism

Slide 8

Page 9: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

System Factors Impact SafetySystem Factors Impact Safety

HospitalHospital

Departmental FactorsDepartmental Factors

Work EnvironmentWork Environment

Team FactorsTeam Factors

Individual ProviderIndividual Provider

Task FactorsTask Factors

Patient CharacteristicsPatient Characteristics

InstitutionalInstitutional

Adopted from VincentAdopted from Vincent

Slide 9

Page 10: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Slide 10

Page 11: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Evidence Regarding the Impact of ICU Evidence Regarding the Impact of ICU Organization on PerformanceOrganization on Performance

• Physicians

• Nurses

• Pharmacists

Pronovost JAMA 1999, 2002; Pronovost ECP 2001

Slide 11

Page 12: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Aviation Accidents Aviation Accidents per Million Departuresper Million Departures

Slide 12

Page 13: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Systems Systems

• Every system is designed to achieve the results it gets

• To improve performance we need to change systems

• Start with pilot test one patient, one day, one physician, one room

Slide 13

Page 14: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Principles of Safe DesignPrinciples of Safe Design

• Standardize – Eliminate steps if possible

• Create independent checks

• Learn when things go wrong– What happened– Why– What did you do to reduce risk– How do you know it worked

Slide 14

Page 15: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

StandardizeStandardize

Slide 15

Page 16: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Line Cart Contents – 4 DrawersLine Cart Contents – 4 Drawers

Slide 16

Page 17: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Eliminate StepsEliminate Steps

Slide 17

Page 18: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Create Independent ChecksCreate Independent Checks

Slide 18

Page 19: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

2 Year Results from 103 2 Year Results from 103 ICUsICUs

Time period Median CRBSI rate Incidence rate ratio

Baseline 2.7 1

Peri intervention 1.6 0.76

0-3 months 0 0.62

4-6 months 0 0.56

7-9 months 0 0.47

10-12 months 0 0.42

13-15 months 0 0.37

16-18 months 0 0.34

Pronovost NEJM 2006

Slide 19

Page 20: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Principles of Safe Design Apply to Principles of Safe Design Apply to Technical and TeamworkTechnical and Teamwork

Page 21: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Basic Components and Process of Basic Components and Process of CommunicationCommunication

Elizabeth Dayton, Joint Commission Journal, Jan. 2007

Slide 21

Page 22: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety
Page 23: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

 

% o

f res

pond

ents

repo

rting

abo

ve a

dequ

ate

team

work

ICUSRS Data

ICU Physicians and ICU RN ICU Physicians and ICU RN CollaborationCollaboration

Slide 23

Page 24: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Teamwork ToolsTeamwork Tools

• Daily goals

• AM briefing

• Shadowing

Slide 24

Page 25: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Teams Make Wise Decisions When There Teams Make Wise Decisions When There is Diverse and Independent Inputis Diverse and Independent Input

• Wisdom of Crowds

• Alternate between convergent and divergent thinking– Get from OR to balcony

Slide 25

Page 26: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Slide 26

Page 27: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Don’t Play Man DownDon’t Play Man Down

When you feel something say When you feel something say somethingsomething

Slide 27

Page 28: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

Action ItemsAction Items

• Pick one area and reflect on the systems that predict performance– Walk and observe the process

• Work to standardize one process such as central line cart

• Pilot test it

• Ensure all staff know the science for improving patient safety

Slide 28

Page 29: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety
Page 30: On the CUSP: STOP BSI The Science of Improving  Patient Safety

ReferencesReferences

• Berwick DM. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ 1996;132:619-22.

• Langley G, Nolan K. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass Publishers 1996.

• Needham DM, Thompson DM, et al. A system factors analysis of airway events from the Intensive Care Unit Safety Reporting System (ICUSRS). Crit Care Med 2004;32:2227-33.

• Pronovost PJ, Wu Aw, et al. Acute decompensation after removing a central line: practical approaches to increasing safety in the intensive care unit. Ann Int Med 2004;140(12):1025-1033.

• Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, et al. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;288(17):2151-2162.

• Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2000.

Slide 30