on the job review
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 On the Job Review
1/2
Introduction
I have always sneered at the sight of bold-colored posters plastered around the
cinemas during Christmas breaks. The Metro Manila Film Festival is donned with titles
likeKimmy Dora: Ang Kiyemeng Prequel, Sosy Problems, Sisterakas, My Little Bossings or
romance films entitled after cheesy lyrics taken from songs headings that never really strike
my fancy. This distaste goes beyond mere titles of course. I find movies at the Pinoy box
office predictable, static and with little or no artistic element. The movies are often riddled
with flat characters that embody stereotypes like the suplado rich boy and the loud barrio
girl. Their attitudes are tweaked on cue that moment after they fall in love. Humor laden
with gay lingo and recurring themes on crossing social hierarchies probably never really
clicked with me.
In contrast, I was willing to wait in a long line under the rain when Cinemalaya Films
were showing at the UP Film Center. I have always preferred independent films because of
the way each scene is crafted, the way actors look like real people and most of all, the
recurring social themes that may be too sensitive for most people to digest existentialism,
sexuality, social ills and politics. There is often less focus on selling for wide acceptance
but more on being full and intricate enough for people who would. These are the types of
movies that leaves an aftertaste that can keep you buried in thoughts for days on end.
The very first and last Pinoy film I have seen in the big screen isAng Babae sa Septic
Tank (contrary to its title, it was a product of pure artistic genius) but it was also
independently produced. On the Job is the very first Pinoy studio film production I have
watched in the movies and Im more than glad I did. Its easy to say that its probably a
pioneer that has brought action thrillers and perhaps all other popular movie production into a
whole new level. It felt like watching an indie film except it was much longer and there was
clearly a lot more money put into it. Beyond those shallow observations of course, the most
exceptional element was the subject area it tackled corruption, crime and politics that does
not seem to be entirely fictional. The eerie realization through this film though is the fact that
even grave moral misconduct such as killing for a living seems to be justified in another
mans lenses. The use of such a medium to effect influence in its viewers consciousness is
precisely why besides the calculated angles and perfect cuts of scenes, the intricate story line
and the plot twists towards the end, the movies prime success were in its characters. In
-
7/27/2019 On the Job Review
2/2
particular, I was impressed that they were able to craft multi-dimensional characters. Each
one was styled to elicit mixed emotions like the way one could look at Tatang both as the
antagonist and the protagonist in the story. Besides the obvious range seen in Tatangs
actions, his characters seem to possess entirely contradicting personalities. The same can be
said of Joaquin Acosta.
Joey Marquez as Joaquin Acosta
Sergeant Acosta seems like the epitome of a hero a clean, honest, principled and
hardworking cop running after the bad guys. He is however a victim entrenched in a
system that runs a different game completely opposite what he was mandated to do.
Consequently, he is portrayed as a loser unable to step up the ranks. Much to his disdain, he
is stuck in the position he is in because he was wrongfully included in an intra-agency
corruption controversy in the past. If he was ever guilty of any form of corruption, it is of
being a policeman and a father unable to criminalize his own child. Their relationship briefly
alludes to an irony which is perhaps the most descriptive of his characters fate. In a lot of
instances, it seems that he would fulfil the role primarily attached to his type of character
the underdog that would develop into the celebrated hero. But he always falls short. This is
illustrated in the scene where he finally got a hold of his boy and once in the position to
capture him, he was overcome by his emotions and consequently, the rascal slipped from his
grasp. Contrary to the usual story line where an underdog develops into a victor, it seems
that he is perpetually stuck in repetitive cycles of failure.
It is ironic that his strength in character seems to be his weakness in performance.
Besides being consumed in his desire to solve the case and perhaps improve his status, he
feels too strongly against the wrongdoers he so desperately wants to indict that at the last few
scenes, he bravely but unwittingly drove chasing the antagonists screaming and attacking
them. This eventually led to him being fired and placed in a position where he is now
completely incapacitated from ever attaining what hes fighting for. Perhaps it can be said
that he was too swept by emotion that he was unable to assess the situation because had he
looked closely at the crime scene, there was no way he could have missed the evidence in
Piolo Pascuals phone.