on the thermal structure of oceanic transform faults9 structure beneath oceanic transform faults. we...
TRANSCRIPT
-
*Corresponding Author, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 360 Woods Hole Road MS #22, Woods Hole, MA 02543, email: [email protected], phone: 508-289-3637, fax: 508-457-2187.
On the thermal structure of oceanic transform faults 1 Mark D. Behn1,*, Margaret S. Boettcher1,2, and Greg Hirth1 2 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA 3 2U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA 4 5 6 Abstract: 7 We use 3-D finite element simulations to investigate the upper mantle temperature 8
structure beneath oceanic transform faults. We show that using a rheology that 9
incorporates brittle weakening of the lithosphere generates a region of enhanced mantle 10
upwelling and elevated temperatures along the transform, with the warmest temperatures 11
and thinnest lithosphere predicted near the center of the transform. In contrast, previous 12
studies that examined 3-D advective and conductive heat transport found that oceanic 13
transform faults are characterized by anomalously cold upper mantle relative to adjacent 14
intra-plate regions, with the thickest lithosphere at the center of the transform. These 15
earlier studies used simplified rheologic laws to simulate the behavior of the lithosphere 16
and underlying asthenosphere. Here, we show that the warmer thermal structure 17
predicted by our calculations is directly attributed to the inclusion of a more realistic 18
brittle rheology. This warmer upper mantle temperature structure is consistent with a 19
wide range of geophysical and geochemical observations from ridge-transform 20
environments, including the depth of transform fault seismicity, geochemical anomalies 21
along adjacent ridge segments, and the tendency for long transforms to break into a series 22
of small intra-transform spreading centers during changes in plate motion. 23
Key Words: Oceanic transform faults, mid-ocean ridges, fault rheology, intra-transform 24 spreading centers 25
26
-
-2-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
1. Introduction 26
Oceanic transform faults are an ideal environment for studying the mechanical 27
behavior of strike-slip faults because of the relatively simple thermal, kinematic, and 28
compositional structure of the oceanic lithosphere. In continental regions fault zone 29
rheology is influenced by a combination of mantle thermal structure, variations in crustal 30
thickness, and heterogeneous crustal and mantle composition. By contrast, the rheology 31
of the oceanic upper mantle is primarily controlled by temperature. In the ocean basins 32
effective elastic plate thickness (e.g., Watts, 1978) and the maximum depth of intra-plate 33
earthquakes (Chen and Molnar, 1983; McKenzie et al., 2005; Wiens and Stein, 1983) 34
correlate closely with the location of the 600ºC isotherm as calculated from a half-space 35
cooling model. Similarly, recent studies show that the maximum depth of transform fault 36
earthquakes corresponds to the location of the 600ºC isotherm derived by averaging the 37
half-space thermal structures on either side of the fault (Abercrombie and Ekström, 2001; 38
Boettcher, 2005). These observations are consistent with extrapolations from laboratory 39
studies on olivine that indicate the transition from stable to unstable frictional sliding 40
occurs around 600ºC at geologic strain-rates (Boettcher et al., 2006). Furthermore, 41
microstructures observed in peridotite mylonites from oceanic transforms show that 42
localized viscous deformation occurs at temperatures around 600–800ºC (e.g., Jaroslow 43
et al., 1996; Warren and Hirth, 2006). 44
While a half-space cooling model does a good job of predicting the maximum depth 45
of transform earthquakes, it neglects many important physical processes that occur in the 46
Earth’s crust and upper mantle (e.g., advective heat transport resulting from temperature-47
dependent viscous flow, hydrothermal circulation, and viscous dissipation). Numerical 48
models that incorporate 3-D advective and conductive heat transport indicate that the 49
upper mantle beneath oceanic transform faults is anomalously cold relative to a half-50
space model (Forsyth and Wilson, 1984; Furlong et al., 2001; Phipps Morgan and 51
Forsyth, 1988; Shen and Forsyth, 1992). This reduction in mantle temperature results 52
from a combination of two effects: 1) conductive cooling from the adjacent old, cold 53
lithosphere across the transform fault, and 2) decreased mantle upwelling beneath the 54
transform. Together these effects can result in up to a ~75% increase in lithospheric 55
thickness beneath the center of a transform fault relative to a half-space cooling model, as 56
-
-3-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
well as significant cooling of the upper mantle beneath the ends of the adjacent spreading 57
centers. This characteristic ridge-transform thermal structure has been invoked to explain 58
the focusing of crustal production toward the centers of ridge segments (Magde and 59
Sparks, 1997; Phipps Morgan and Forsyth, 1988; Sparks et al., 1993), geochemical 60
evidence for colder upper mantle temperatures near segment ends (Ghose et al., 1996; 61
Niu and Batiza, 1994; Reynolds and Langmuir, 1997), increased fault throw and wider 62
fault spacing near segment ends (Shaw, 1992; Shaw and Lin, 1993), and the blockage of 63
along-axis flow of plume material (Georgen and Lin, 2003). 64
However, correlating the maximum depth of earthquakes on transform faults with this 65
colder thermal structure implies that the transition from stable to unstable frictional 66
sliding occurs at temperatures closer to ~350ºC, which is inconsistent with both 67
laboratory studies and the depth of intra-plate earthquakes. Moreover, if oceanic 68
lithosphere is anomalously cold and thick beneath oceanic transform faults, it is difficult 69
to explain the tendency for long transform faults to break into a series of en echelon 70
transform zones separated by small intra-transform spreading centers during changes in 71
plate motion (Fox and Gallo, 1984; Lonsdale, 1989; Menard and Atwater, 1969; Searle, 72
1983). 73
To address these discrepancies between the geophysical observations and the 74
predictions of previous numerical modeling studies, we investigate the importance of 75
fault rheology on the thermo-mechanical behavior of oceanic transform faults. Earlier 76
studies that incorporated 3-D conductive and advective heat transport used simplified 77
rheologic laws to simulate the behavior of the lithosphere and underlying asthenosphere. 78
Using a series of 3-D finite element models, we show that brittle weakening of the 79
lithosphere strongly reduces the effective viscosity beneath the transform, resulting in 80
enhanced upwelling and thinning of the lithosphere. Our calculations suggest that the 81
thermal structure of oceanic transform faults is more similar to that predicted from half-82
space cooling, but with the warmest temperatures located near the center of the 83
transform. These results have important implications for the mechanical behavior of 84
oceanic transforms, melt generation and migration at mid-ocean ridges, and the long-term 85
response of transform faults to changes in plate motion. 86
-
-4-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
2. Model Setup 87
To solve for coupled 3-D incompressible mantle flow and thermal structure 88
surrounding an oceanic transform fault we use the COMSOL 3.2 finite element software 89
package (Figure 1). In all simulations, flow is driven by imposing horizontal velocities 90
parallel to a 150-km transform fault along the top boundaries of the model space 91
assuming a full spreading rate of 6 cm/yr. The base of the model is open to convective 92
flux without resistance from the underlying mantle. Symmetric boundary conditions are 93
imposed on the sides of the model space parallel to the spreading direction, and the 94
boundaries perpendicular to spreading are open to convective flux. The temperature 95
across the top and bottom of the model space is set to Ts = 0ºC and Tm = 1300ºC, 96
respectively. Flow associated with temperature and compositional buoyancy is ignored. 97
To investigate the importance of rheology on the pattern of flow and thermal structure 98
at oceanic transform faults we examined four scenarios with increasingly realistic 99
descriptions of mantle rheology: 1) constant viscosity, 2) temperature-dependent 100
viscosity, 3) temperature-dependent viscosity with an pre-defined weak zone around the 101
transform, and 4) temperature-dependent viscosity with a visco-plastic approximation for 102
brittle weakening. In all models we assume a Newtonian mantle rheology. In Models 2–103
4 the effect of temperature on viscosity is calculated by: 104
!
" ="oexp Qo /RT( )exp Qo /RTm( )
#
$ %
&
' ( (1) 105
where ηo is the reference viscosity of 1019 Pa⋅s, Qo is the activation energy, and R is the 106
gas constant. In all simulations we assume an activation energy of 250 kJ/mol. This 107
value represents a reduction of a factor of two relative to the laboratory value as a linear 108
approximation for non-linear rheology (Christensen, 1983). The maximum viscosity is 109
not allowed to exceed 1023 Pa⋅s. 110
3. Influence of 3-D Mantle Flow on Transform Thermal Structure 111
Figure 2 illustrates the thermal structure calculated at the center of the transform fault 112
from Models 1–4, as well as the thermal structure determined by averaging half-spacing 113
cooling models on either side of the transform. Because the thermal structure calculated 114
from half-space cooling is equal on the adjacent plates, the averaging approach predicts 115
-
-5-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
the same temperature at the center of the transform fault as for the adjacent intra-plate 116
regions. This model, therefore, provides a good reference for evaluating whether our 3-D 117
numerical calculations predict excess cooling or excess heating below the transform. The 118
temperature solution for a constant viscosity mantle (Model 1) was determined 119
previously by Phipps Morgan and Forsyth (1988); our results agree with theirs to within 120
5% throughout the model space. The coupled temperature, mantle flow solution predicts 121
a significantly colder thermal structure at the center of the transform than does half-space 122
cooling, with the depth of the 600ºC isotherm increasing from ~7 km for the half-space 123
model to ~12 km for the constant viscosity flow solution (Figure 2A). As noted by 124
Phipps Morgan and Forsyth (1988) this reduction in temperature is primarily the result of 125
decreased mantle upwelling beneath the transform fault relative to enhanced upwelling 126
under the ridge axis. Shen and Forsyth (1992) showed that incorporating temperature-127
dependent viscosity (e.g., Model 2) produces enhanced upwelling and warmer 128
temperatures beneath the ridge axis relative to a constant viscosity mantle (Figure 3). 129
However, away from the ridge axis the two solutions are quite similar and result in 130
almost identical temperature-depth profiles at the center of the transform (Figures 2A & 131
3). 132
4. Influence of Fault Zone Rheology on Transform Thermal Structure 133
Several lines of evidence indicate that oceanic transform faults are significantly 134
weaker than the surrounding lithosphere. Comparisons of abyssal hill fabric observed 135
near transforms to predictions of fault patterns from numerical modeling suggest that the 136
mechanical coupling across the fault is very weak on geologic time scales (Behn et al., 137
2002; Phipps Morgan and Parmentier, 1984). Furthermore, dredging in transform valleys 138
and valley walls frequently returns serpentinized peridotites (Cannat et al., 1991; Dick et 139
al., 1991), which may promote considerable frictional weakening along the transform 140
(Escartín et al., 2001; Moore et al., 1996; Rutter and Brodie, 1987). Finally, in 141
comparison to continental strike-slip faults, seismic moment studies show that oceanic 142
transforms have high seismic deficits (Boettcher and Jordan, 2004; Okal and 143
Langenhorst, 2000), suggesting that oceanic transforms may be characterized by large 144
amounts of aseismic slip. 145
-
-6-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
In Model 3 we simulate the effect of a weak fault zone, by setting the viscosity to 1019 146
Pa⋅s in a 5-km wide region surrounding the transform that extends downward to a depth 147
of 20 km. This results in a narrow fault zone that is 3–4 orders of magnitude lower 148
viscosity than the surrounding regions. Our approach is similar to that used by Furlong et 149
al. (2001) and van Wijk and Blackman (2004), though these earlier studies modeled 150
deformation in a visco-elastic system in which the transform fault was simulated as a 151
shear-stress-free plane using the slippery node technique of Melosh and Williams (1989). 152
Our models show that the incorporation of a weak fault zone produces slightly warmer 153
conditions along the transform than for either a constant viscosity mantle (Model 1) or 154
temperature-dependent viscosity without an imposed fault zone (Model 2). However, the 155
predicted temperatures from the fault zone model remain colder than those calculated by 156
the half-space cooling model (Figures 2A & 3). Varying the maximum depth of the 157
weak zone does not significantly influence the predicted thermal structure. 158
Representing the transform as a pre-defined zone of uniform weakness clearly over-159
simplifies the brittle processes occurring within the lithosphere. In Model 4, we 160
incorporate a more realistic formulation for fault zone behavior by using a visco-plastic 161
rheology to simulate brittle weakening (Chen and Morgan, 1990). In this formulation, 162
brittle strength is approximated by defining a frictional resistance law (e.g., Byerlee, 163
1978): 164
!
"max
= Co
+ µ#gz (2) 165
in which Co is cohesion (10 MPa), µ is the friction coefficient (0.6), ρ is density (3300 166
kg/m3), g is the gravitational acceleration, and z is depth. Following Chen and Morgan 167
(1990), the maximum effective viscosity is then limited by: 168
!
" =#
max
2˙ $ II
(3) 169
where
!
˙ " II is the second-invariant of the strain-rate tensor. The effect of adding this brittle 170
failure law is to limit viscosity near the surface where the temperature dependence of 171
Equation 1 produces unrealistically high mantle viscosities and stresses (Figure 2B). 172
The inclusion of the visco-plastic rheology results in significantly warmer thermal 173
conditions beneath the transform than predicted by Models 1–3 or half-space cooling 174
(Figures 2A & 3). The higher temperatures result from the brittle weakening of the 175
-
-7-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
lithosphere, which reduces the effective viscosity by up to 2 orders of magnitude in a 10-176
km wide region surrounding the fault zone. Unlike Model 3 the width of this region is 177
not predefined and develops as a function of the rheology and applied boundary 178
conditions. The zone of decreased viscosity enhances passive upwelling beneath the 179
transform, which in turn increases upward heat transport, warming the fault zone and 180
further reducing viscosity (Figure 4). The result is a characteristic thermal structure in 181
which the transform fault is warmest at its center and cools towards the adjacent ridge 182
segments (Figures 2C). Moreover, rather than the transform being a region of 183
anomalously cold lithosphere relative to a half-space cooling model and the surrounding 184
intra-plate mantle, the center of the transform is warmer than adjacent lithosphere of the 185
same age. 186
Although we have not explicitly modeled the effects of non-linear rheology, several 187
previous studies have examined the importance of a non-linear viscosity law on mantle 188
flow and thermal structure in a segmented ridge-transform system (Furlong et al., 2001; 189
Shen and Forsyth, 1992; van Wijk and Blackman, 2004). Without the effects of brittle 190
weakening, these earlier studies predicted temperatures below the transform that were 191
significantly colder than a half-space cooling model. Thus, we conclude that the 192
inclusion of a visco-plastic rheology is the key factor for producing the warmer transform 193
fault thermal structure illustrated in Model 4. 194
5. Implications for the Behavior of Oceanic Transform Faults 195
Our numerical simulations indicate that brittle weakening plays an important role in 196
controlling the thermal structure beneath oceanic transform faults. Specifically, 197
incorporating a more realistic treatment of brittle rheology (as shown in Model 4), results 198
in an upper mantle temperature structure that is consistent with a wide range of 199
geophysical and geochemical observations from ridge-transform environments. The 200
temperatures below the transform fault predicted in Model 4 are similar to the half-space 201
cooling model, indicating that the maximum depth of transform fault seismicity is indeed 202
limited by the ~600ºC isotherm as shown by Abercrombie and Ekström (2001). This 203
temperature is consistent with the transition from velocity-weakening to velocity-204
strengthening frictional behavior extrapolated from laboratory experiments (Boettcher et 205
-
-8-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
al., 2006) and the depth of oceanic intra-plate earthquakes (McKenzie et al., 2005). In 206
addition, a combination of microstructural and petrological observations indicate that the 207
transition from brittle to ductile processes occurs at a temperature of ~600ºC in oceanic 208
transform faults. Microstructural analyses of peridotite mylonites recovered from 209
oceanic fracture zones indicate that strain localization results from the combined effects 210
of grain size reduction, grain boundary sliding and second phase pinning (Warren and 211
Hirth, 2006). Jaroslow et al. (1996) estimated a minimum temperature for mylonite 212
deformation of ~600ºC, based on olivine-spinel geothermometry. Furthermore, the 213
randomization of pre-existing lattice preferred orientation (LPO) in the finest grained 214
areas of these mylonites indicates the grain size reduction promotes a transition from 215
dislocation creep processes to diffusion creep, consistent with extrapolation of 216
experimental olivine flow laws to temperatures of 600–800ºC. 217
While the inclusion of a visco-plastic rheology results in significant warming beneath 218
the transform fault, the temperature structure at the ends of the adjacent ridge segments 219
changes only slightly relative to the solution for a constant viscosity mantle. In 220
particular, both models predict a region of cooling along the adjacent ridge segments that 221
extends 15–20 km from the transform fault (Figure 2C). This transform “edge effect” 222
has been invoked to explain segment scale variations in basalt chemistry (Ghose et al., 223
1996; Niu and Batiza, 1994; Reynolds and Langmuir, 1997) and increased fault throw 224
and fault spacing toward the ends of slow-spreading ridge segments (Shaw, 1992; Shaw 225
and Lin, 1993). In addition, this along-axis temperature gradient provides an efficient 226
mechanism for focusing crustal production toward the centers of ridge segments (Magde 227
and Sparks, 1997; Phipps Morgan and Forsyth, 1988; Sparks et al., 1993). 228
The elevated temperatures near the center of the transform in Model 4 may also 229
account for the tendency of long transform faults to break into a series of intra-transform 230
spreading centers during changes in plate motion (Fox and Gallo, 1984; Lonsdale, 1989; 231
Menard and Atwater, 1969). This “leaky transform” phenomenon has been attributed to 232
the weakness of oceanic transform faults relative to the surrounding lithosphere (Fox and 233
Gallo, 1984; Lowrie et al., 1986; Searle, 1983). However, the leaky transform hypothesis 234
is in direct conflict with the thermal structure predicted from Models 1–3, which show 235
the transform to be a region of anomalously cold, thick lithosphere. In contrast, the 236
-
-9-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
thermal structure predicted by Model 4 indicates that transforms are hottest and weakest 237
near their centers (Figure 2C). Thus, perturbations in plate motion, which generate 238
extension across the transform, should result in rifting and enhanced melting in these 239
regions. 240
The incorporation of the brittle rheology also promotes strain localization on the plate 241
scale. In particular, if transforms were regions of thick, cold lithosphere (as predicted by 242
Models 1–3) then over time deformation would tend to migrate outward from the 243
transform zone into the adjacent regions of thinner lithosphere. However, the warmer 244
thermal structure that results from the incorporation of a visco-plastic rheology will tend 245
to keep deformation localized within the transform zone on time-scales corresponding to 246
the age of ocean basins. 247
In summary, brittle weakening of the lithosphere along oceanic transform faults 248
generates a region of enhanced mantle upwelling and elevated temperatures relative to 249
adjacent intra-plate regions. The thermal structure is similar to that predicted by a half-250
space cooling model, but with the warmest temperatures located at the center of the 251
transform. This characteristic upper mantle temperature structure is consistent with a 252
wide range of geophysical and geochemical observations, and provides important 253
constraints on the future interpretation of microseismicity data, heat flow, and basalt and 254
peridotite geochemistry in ridge-transform environments. 255
Acknowledgements 256
We thank Jeff McGuire, Laurent Montési, Trish Gregg, Jian Lin, Henry Dick, and Don 257
Forsyth for fruitful discussions that helped motivate this work. Funding was provided by 258
NSF grants EAR-0405709 and OCE-0443246. 259
260
-
-10-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
Figure Captions 260
Figure 1: Model setup for numerical simulations of mantle flow and thermal structure at 261
oceanic transform faults. All calculations are performed for a 150-km long transform and 262
a full spreading rate of 6 cm/yr. Locations of cross-sections used in Figures 2–4 are 263
shown in grey. 264
Figure 2: (A) Thermal structure and (B) stress calculated versus depth calculated at the 265
center of a 150-km long transform fault assuming a full spreading rate of 6 cm/yr. (C) 266
Location of the 600ºC and 1200ºC isotherms along the plate boundary for the half-space 267
model (grey), Model 1 (black), and Model 4 (red). 268
Figure 3: Cross-sections of mantle temperature at a depth of 20 km for (A) Model 1: 269
constant viscosity of 1019 Pa⋅s, (B) Model 2: temperature-dependent viscosity, (C) Model 270
3: temperature-dependent viscosity with a weak fault zone, and (D) Model 4: 271
temperature-dependent viscosity with a frictional failure law. Black arrows indicate 272
horizontal flow velocities. Grey lines show position of plate boundary. Location of 273
horizontal cross-section is indicated in Figure 1. Note that Model 4 incorporating 274
frictional resistance predicts significantly warmer temperatures along the transform than 275
Models 1–3. 276
Figure 4: Vertical cross-sections through the center of the transform fault showing (left) 277
strain-rate, and (right) temperature and mantle flow for Models 1–4. The location of the 278
cross-sections is indicated in Figure 1. Note the enhanced upwelling below the transform 279
results in warmer thermal structure for Model 4 compared to Models 1–3. 280
281
-
-11-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
References 281
Abercrombie, R.E., and Ekström, G., 2001, Earthquake slip on oceanic transform faults: 282 Nature, v. 410, p. 74-77. 283
Behn, M.D., Lin, J., and Zuber, M.T., 2002, Evidence for weak oceanic transform faults: 284 Geophys. Res. Lett., v. 29, doi:10.1029/2002GL015612. 285
Boettcher, M.S., 2005, Slip on Ridge Transform Faults: Insights from Earthquakes and 286 Laboratory Experiments [Ph.D. thesis], MIT/WHOI Joint Program. 287
Boettcher, M.S., Hirth, G., and Evans, B., 2006, Olivine friction at the base of oceanic 288 seismogenic zones: J. Geophys. Res., submitted. 289
Boettcher, M.S., and Jordan, T.H., 2004, Earthquake scaling relations for mid-ocean 290 ridge transform faults: J. Geophys. Res., v. 109, doi:10.1029/2004JB003110. 291
Byerlee, J., 1978, Friction of rocks: Pure Appl. Geophys., v. 116, p. 615-626. 292 Cannat, M., Mamaloukas-Frangoulis, V., Auzende, J.-M., Bideau, D., Bonatti, E., 293
Honnorez, J., Lagabrielle, Y., Malavielle, J., and Mevel, C., 1991, A geological 294 cross-section of the Vema fracture zone transverse ridge, Atlantic Ocean: J. 295 Geodyn., v. 13, p. 97-118. 296
Chen, W.-P., and Molnar, P., 1983, Focal depths of intracontinental and intraplate 297 earthquakes and their implications for the thermal and mechanical properties of 298 the lithosphere: J. Geophys. Res., v. 88, p. 4183-4214. 299
Chen, Y., and Morgan, W.J., 1990, A nonlinear rheology model for mid-ocean ridge axis 300 topography: J. Geophys. Res., v. 95, p. 17583-17604. 301
Christensen, U., 1983, Convection in a variable-viscosity fluid: Newtonian versus power-302 law rheology: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 64, p. 153-162. 303
Dick, H.J.B., Schouten, H., Meyer, P.S., Gallo, D.G., Bergh, H., Tyce, R., Patriat, P., 304 Johnson, K.T.M., Snow, J., and Fisher, A., 1991, Tectonic evolution of the 305 Atlantis II Fracture Zone, in Von Herzen, R.P., and Robinson, P.T., eds., Proc. 306 ODP, Sci. Results, Volume 118: College Station, Ocean Drilling Program, p. 359-307 398. 308
Escartín, J., Hirth, G., and Evans, B., 2001, Strength of slightly serpentinized peridotites: 309 Implications for the tectonics of oceanic lithosphere: Geology, v. 29, p. 1023-310 1026. 311
Forsyth, D.W., and Wilson, B., 1984, Three-dimensional temperature structure of a ridge-312 transform-ridge system: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 70, p. 355-362. 313
Fox, P.J., and Gallo, D.G., 1984, A tectonic model for ridge-transform-ridge plate 314 boundaries: Implications for the structure of oceanic lithosphere: Tectonophys., v. 315 104, p. 205-242. 316
Furlong, K.P., Sheaffer, S.D., and Malservisi, R., 2001, Thermal-rheological controls on 317 deformation within oceanic transforms, in Holdsworth, R.E., Strachan, R.A., 318 Magloughlin, J.F., and Knipe, R.J., eds., The Nature and Tectonic Significance of 319 Fault Zone Weakening, Volume 186: London, Geology Society, p. 65-84. 320
Georgen, J.E., and Lin, J., 2003, Plume-transform interactions at ultra-slow spreading 321 ridges: Implications for the Southwest Indian Ridge: Geochem., Geophys., 322 Geosys., v. 4, 9106, doi:10.1029/2003GC000542. 323
-
-12-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
Ghose, I., Cannat, M., and Seyler, M., 1996, Transform fault effect on mantle melting in 324 the MARK area (Mid-Atlantic Ridge south of the Kane transform): Geology, v. 325 24, p. 1139-1142. 326
Jaroslow, G.E., Hirth, G., and Dick, H.J.B., 1996, Abyssal peridotite mylonites: 327 Implications for grain-size sensitive flow and strain localization in the oceanic 328 lithosphere: Tectonophys., v. 256, p. 17-37. 329
Lonsdale, P., 1989, Segmentation of the Pacific-Nazca spreading center, 1ºN-20ºS: J. 330 Geophys. Res., v. 94, p. 12,197-12,225. 331
Lowrie, A., Smoot, C., and Batiza, R., 1986, Are oceanic fracture zones locked and 332 strong or weak? New evidence for volcanic activity and weakness: Geology, v. 333 14, p. 242-245. 334
Magde, L.S., and Sparks, D.W., 1997, Three-dimensional mantle upwelling, melt 335 generation, and melt migration beneath segment slow spreading ridges: J. 336 Geophys. Res., v. 102, p. 20571-20583. 337
McKenzie, D., Jackson, J., and Priestley, K., 2005, Thermal structure of oceanic and 338 continental lithosphere: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 233, p. 337-349. 339
Melosh, H.J., and Williams, C.A., Jr., 1989, Mechanics of graben formation in crustal 340 rocks: A finite element analysis: J. Geophys. Res., v. 94, p. 13,961-13,973. 341
Menard, H.W., and Atwater, T., 1969, Origin of fracture zone topography: Nature, v. 342 222, p. 1037-1040. 343
Moore, D.E., Lockner, L.D.A., Summers, R., Shengli, M., and Byerlee, J.D., 1996, 344 Strength of chrysotile-serpentinite gouge under hydrothermal conditions: Can it 345 explain a weak San Andreas fault? Geology, v. 24, p. 1041-1044. 346
Niu, Y., and Batiza, R., 1994, Magmatic processes at a slow spreading ridge segment: 347 26ºS Mid-Atlantic Ridge: J. Geophys. Res., v. 99, p. 19,719-19,740. 348
Okal, E.A., and Langenhorst, A.R., 2000, Seismic properties of the Eltanin Transform 349 System, South Pacific: Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 119, p. 185-208. 350
Phipps Morgan, J., and Forsyth, D.W., 1988, Three-dimensional flow and temperature 351 perturbations due to a transform offset: Effects on oceanic crust and upper mantle 352 structure: J. Geophys. Res., v. 93, p. 2955-2966. 353
Phipps Morgan, J., and Parmentier, E.M., 1984, Lithospheric stress near a ridge-354 transform intersection: Geophys. Res. Lett., v. 11, p. 113-116. 355
Reynolds, J.R., and Langmuir, C.H., 1997, Petrological systematics of the Mid-Atlantic 356 Ridge south of Kane: Implications for ocean crust formation: J. Geophys. Res., v. 357 102, p. 14,915-14,946. 358
Rutter, E.H., and Brodie, K.H., 1987, On the mechanical properties of oceanic transform 359 faults: Ann. Tecton., v. 1, p. 87-96. 360
Searle, R.C., 1983, Multiple, closely spaced transform faults in fast-slipping fracture 361 zones: Geology, v. 11, p. 607-611. 362
Shaw, P.R., 1992, Ridge segmentation, faulting and crustal thickness in the Atlantic 363 Ocean: Nature, v. 358, p. 490-493. 364
Shaw, P.R., and Lin, J., 1993, Causes and consequences of variations in faulting style at 365 the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: J. Geophys. Res., v. 98, p. 21,839-21,851. 366
Shen, Y., and Forsyth, D.W., 1992, The effects of temperature- and pressure-dependent 367 viscosity on three-dimensional passive flow of the mantle beneath a ridge-368 transform system: J. Geophys. Res., v. 97, p. 19,717-19,728. 369
-
-13-
Behn et al: Thermal Structure of Oceanic Transform Faults, Submitted to Geology March 2006
Sparks, D.W., Parmentier, E.M., and Phipps Morgan, J., 1993, Three-dimensional mantle 370 convection beneath a segmented spreading center: Implications for along-axis 371 variations in crustal thickness and gravity: J. Geophys. Res., v. 98, p. 21,977-372 21,995. 373
van Wijk, J.W., and Blackman, D.K., 2004, Deformation of oceanic lithosphere near 374 slow-spreading ridge discontinuities: Tectonophys., v. 407, p. 211-225. 375
Warren, J.M., and Hirth, G., 2006, Grain size sensitive deformation mechanisms in 376 naturally deformed peridotites: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. in revision. 377
Watts, A.B., 1978, An analysis of isostasy in the World's Oceans 1. Hawaiian-Emperor 378 Seamount Chain: J. Geophys. Res., v. 83, p. 5989-6004. 379
Wiens, D.A., and Stein, S., 1983, Age dependence of oceanic intraplate seismicity and 380 implications for lithospheric evolution: J. Geophys. Res., v. 88, p. 6455-6468. 381
382 383
-
250 km
150 km
50 km
100 km
100 km
3 cm/yr
3 cm/yr Ts = 0ºC
Tm = 1300ºC
Fig. 4
Fig. 3
Figure 1
-
0 100 200 300Stress (MPa)
B)Center ofTransform
Temperature (oC)
Dep
th (k
m)
Half−Space ModelModel 1: Constant ηModel 2: η(T)Model 3: η(T) + FaultModel 4: η(T, friction)
A)Center ofTransform
0 500 1000−35
−30
−25
−20
−15
−10
−5
0
Distance Along Plate Boundary (km)
Dep
th (k
m)
Transform FaultRidge RidgeAxis Axis
600oC Isotherm ~ B/D Transition
1200oC Isotherm ~ Solidus
C)
Figure 2
−100 −75 −50 −25 0 25 50 75 100
−30
−20
−10
0
-
Alon
g−R
idge
Dis
tanc
e (k
m)
A. Model 1: Constant η
−40
−20
0
20
40 B. Model 2: η(T)
Along−Transform Distance (km)
C. Model 3: η(T) + Fault
−100 −50 0 50 100−40
−20
0
20
40
Along−Transform Distance (km)
D. Model 4: η(T, friction)
Figure 3
−100 −50 0 50 100
Temperature (oC)1000 1100 1200 1300
-
Dep
th (k
m)
A. Model 1: Constant η
−80
−60
−40
−20
0
Dep
th (k
m)
B. Model 2: η(T)
−80
−60
−40
−20
0
Dep
th (k
m)
C. Model 3: η(T) + Fault
−80
−60
−40
−20
0
Dep
th (k
m)
D. Model 4: η(T, friction)
log10 srII (1/s)
−40 −20 0 20 40−80
−60
−40
−20
0
−15 −14 −13 −12
Across−Transform Distance (km)
Temperature (oC)
Figure 4
−40 −20 0 20 40
0 400 800 1200