online laboratory: innovative or infuriating?

49
David Greene [email protected] U Online Laboratory: Innovative or Infuriating?

Upload: samuel-mejia

Post on 01-Jan-2016

18 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Online Laboratory: Innovative or Infuriating?. David Greene [email protected]. Dewey. “all genuine education comes through experience”(1938, p. 25). . . and Dewey advised using “those cases in which we find there is a real development of desirable [experiences] . . .”. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

David [email protected]

Online Laboratory: Innovative or Infuriating?

Page 2: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Dewey . . .

• “all genuine education comes through experience”(1938, p. 25). . . and Dewey advised using “those cases in which we find there is a real development of desirable [experiences] . . .”

Dewey, J. (1938). "Experience and education." New York: Macmillan

Page 3: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Dewey . . .

• Dewey characterized the educational process - "continual reorganization, reconstruction and transformation of experience" (1916, p. 50)

Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education. An introduction to the philosophy of education (1966 edn.), New York: Free Press.

Read more: John Dewey (1859–1952) - Experience and Reflective Thinking, Learning, School and Life, Democracy and Education - Experiences, Philosophy, Society, and Educational http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1914/Dewey-John-1859-1952.html#ixzz1TnYipEiT

Page 4: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Anatomy and biomechanics are all about experience (I know this is a stretch in the use of the term!); can this real experience be created online?

Links to content:https://ramct.colostate.edu/webct/urw/lc5116011.tp0/cobaltMainFrame.dowebct

http://www.mycahs.colostate.edu/david.greene/Functional_Mechanical_Antomy/OT450_BioHumanOccupation_index.htm

Page 5: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 6: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 7: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 8: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 9: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 10: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 11: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 12: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 13: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 14: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 15: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 16: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 17: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 18: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Sample Completed Assignment:

Page 19: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Another:

Page 20: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Picture Postings Spring 2011(13 Students & Not Required)

Page 21: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Picture Postings SM 2011 (46 students & required)

Page 22: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Pictures of their work . . .

Page 23: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 24: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Course Evals – SP2010 (1st Run – Constructions!)

Page 25: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

But when they arrived in the fall and we talked . . . .

• Stressed with too much construction and too little time (regardless of 16-week or 8-week course)

• Too difficult to take and upload digital pictures of work or didn’t own a digital camera

• Had to pack camera, computer; re establish internet connection to finish after move

• Didn’t keep skeleton because didn’t thing would be needing it

Page 26: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 27: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Course Eval Spring 2011(substantially less construction & more BMA)

30. I felt I could navigate the websites for lectures and online construction atlas – I could find where I needed to be.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

2 1 2 2 0 1 3

Mean: 3.43 (1-5 scale)

31. Reading about and completing biomechanical analyses helped me understand the process and material.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

3 2 2 0 0 0 3

Mean: 4.14 (1-5 scale)

Website navigation 3.43 out of 5!

Page 28: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

32. I completed all the required constructions, putting specific muscles onto the skeleton.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

4 0 3 0 0 0 3

Mean: 4.14 (1-5 scale)

33. I felt putting the muscles onto the skeleton helped me understand the content in the lecture pages.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

4 0 2 1 0 0 3

Mean: 4.00 (1-5 scale)

Construction helped 4 out of 5

Page 29: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

34. I feel it is worthwhile and effective to learn through these lab-type activities in an online class format.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

1 1 2 2 1 0 3

Mean: 2.86 (1-5 scale)

35. The instructions in the Atlas were clear enough to feel like I knew how to build the muscular system.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

2 2 2 1 0 0 3

Mean: 3.71 (1-5 scale)

Lab-type activities

effective online 2.86 out

of 5!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Page 30: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

36. I felt the You Tube videos helped me in the constructions.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

3 2 2 0 0 0 3

Mean: 4.14 (1-5 scale)

37. I felt the animations showing motion helped me understand the different movements.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

4 2 1 0 0 0 3

Mean: 4.43 (1-5 scale)

Page 31: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

38. I felt the Interactive Exercises helped me understand the concepts (boutonniere, etc).

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

5 2 0 0 0 0 3

Mean: 4.71 (1-5 scale)

39. I found I could communicate as I needed to (problems, concerns, comments, questions) using either the discussion boards or course email.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

3 3 1 0 0 0 3

Mean: 4.29 (1-5 scale)

Page 32: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

40. I felt this course should have had more opportunity for live Chat Sessions.

5 4 3 2 1 Not Applicable No Response

1 0 3 1 1 0 4

Mean: 2.83 (1-5 scale)

Take-home: Students valued the attributes specific to online

offering – but did not feel it was effective mode of offering!

Page 33: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Course eval comments – Spring 2011 (n=13)Types of activities/assignments contributing most to your experience and learning . . .

•Reading through the website material was very helpful to me (2 mentions): “lectures interesting and stimulating as they encouraged you to participate in interactive activities and gave you an idea of what you were looking at.”

•BMAs (6 mentions): “It allowed me to think about more practical/real-life experiences that OTs may face on the job.”

Page 34: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Course eval comments – Spring 2011 (n=13)Types of activities/assignments contributing most to your experience and learning . . .•Textbook (1 response) (“. . .examples portrayed real examples that I could ponder.”)•Practice test questions (1 response) •Muscle constructions and hand model (2 response) “[These] were key to understanding muscle attachments and movements.” “I wish I had pasted muscles on the skeleton when I took Anatomy.”•Movies (2 response): “The movies and instructions in the atlas were very helpful in orientation and organization. After the movie it was easy to go to area we were focusing on and do the work.

Page 35: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Course eval comments – Spring 2011 (n=13)Types of activities/assignments contributing most to your experience and learning . . .

•Feedback from instructor on BMAs (1 response): “. . . was very important in really thinking about what was going on with muscles and most importantly movements of the different areas of the body..”

•Animations and interactive exercises (1 response)

Page 36: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Which types of activities or assignments contributed least to your experience and learning in this course?

The skeleton/muscle attachments. Although I wish I would have taken this class before I took BMS 301 (Anatomy), these constructions were looooong and quite time consuming. When I found out that they were not required after all . . .I felt that I put considerable time into cutting, glueing, etc. and in the end, I felt the time spent doing the constructions was busy work. “

Page 37: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Which types of activities or assignments contributed least to your experience and learning in this course?

“It would be very helpful to have more movies with a person showing extension, flexion, abduction of hip . . .?! There was a movie explaining supination/pronation with a ruler that was very helpful. I wonder if you could show this with other areas of the body. Liked thumb animations. Should have a direct link on main index page for Index of all animations. If I wanted to look at an animation I had to hunt around for a way to get to the main animation index page.”

Page 38: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

In general, what did you enjoy most about this course?

“I really felt the whole course was great. I think the skeleton model with the youtube videos is a very creative and helpful way of teaching a online course.”

“I enjoyed the interactive web lessons . . .”

“I enjoyed constructing the muscles on my skeleton. The movies and animations were interesting and helpful . . .”

“Liked the work with the skeleton . . .”

Page 39: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Overall comments“I thought this was a very hard class to only offer online. I think the instructor did an awesome job considering it was online, but i really wish CSU would offer it in a classroom setting as well.” “. . . Live chats were good, but it would have been nice if others would have participated in them. I didn't have any opportunity to bounce anything off of others in the class or hear their questions or what they were working on. It is helpful at times to be in class and just be able to listen and watch the teacher. He would have been able to show us the movements he was talking about.”

Page 40: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Overall comments

“The skeleton and BMAs were most the most helpful to me.” “I found it very confusing trying to navigate exactly what he wanted from us in this course.” “Great course, especially helpful to have had hands on anatomy experience . . .”“Wish I would have found out earlier the constructions were not part of the grade . . . so as to avoid the wasted time/money on buying and constructing muscles onto the skeleton.”

Page 41: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?
Page 42: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Overall comments“Fun class that I learned from. However, the class would be much more beneficial if it was taught in real-life.”

Page 43: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Cou

rse

Eva

ls M

ost R

ecen

t

(3.6, n=20)

(4.5, n=20)

(4.5, n=20)

Page 44: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

(4.25, n=20)

(4.55, n=20)

(4.42, n=20)

Page 45: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

(4.68, n=20)

(4.75, n=20)

(4.35, n=20)

Page 46: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

(4.40, n=20)

Page 47: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

4.03

Page 48: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

3.51

Page 49: Online Laboratory:  Innovative or Infuriating?

Overall comments:“Fun class that I learned from. However, the class would be much more beneficial if it was taught in real-life.”